#for example stella

[arcadekitten]

sry if this weird but ur characters have feet right? just saw that hand post and was like “huh. i never see noiserev feet.”

yes LOL! I just typically try to avoid drawing them because I think feet are really ugly, personally. I usually cover them with socks if shoes aren't an option! But sometimes, it is unavoidable...so you will see them in rare instances! (such as the below)

[rhiandoesfandom]

Might be a Controversial take but I don't have a character I "hate" in Helluva Boss. Of course I have ones I dislike as people, (Paimon, Stella, Striker, Crimson, the ush). But none of them I hate as concepts of characters.

One, because they play important parts in shaping other characters and driving plot, which otherwise, we'd never see Blorbos happy if they don't go through shit.

Two, because they're more realistic than we think. Sometimes, there are people like Stella that act the way they do because of the way they grew up and how they take it out on others. There are people that are as evil, abusive and uncaring as Paimon. There are people that are as determined, prideful, and spiteful as Striker. There are people as controlling and domineering in their families as Crimson.

Sure they might be exaggerated, any cartoon is gonna be. But they're realistic to what people go through at the hands of people that are similar in real life.

[linniegator]

If Stella Helluvaboss was a gay male character we would get her side of the story, positive relationship with her daughter and a narrative that would make her more sympathetic but since she is a boring woman character (yucky) in a vivziepop story we will get none of that ❤️‍🔥

[iceaura39]

The holy trinity of "they're definitely hate sinks within the context of their stories, but the fact that they were written that way in the first place is problematic".

[just-a-little-anxious]

My favourite thing about Helluva Boss is how i've seen the 'it's hell' argument used by both helluva boss fans, and people critical of the show.

When people who are critical complain about characters and talk about how some characters are evil for no reason, fans will say 'it's hell, what do you expect? the characters are supposed to be evil'

But then fans will be angry at evil characters themselves and hate them, and you can say 'well, she's from hell, right? What do you expect?'

It's just that i've never seen two groups of people fighting each others' opinions with the same argument. it's so fascinating and i love it.

[sailingfireshipz]

The fact that Stella may never know what Mouch did on her behalf is so poetic 🥹

Remember when Stella rallied the troops to save Pelhams job!? Stella is a great LEADER & it's a shame Damon didn't take the time to actually be coachable. He would have learned just as much from Stella about being a great FF & leader as he would from Kelly.

[batfamfucker]

Appreciation post for 'girly girl' characters and/or shows that celebrate traditionally feminine things that girls and women are shamed for.

Characters on this list that love makeup, fashion, hair, etc. Characters that are still written as strong, intelligent, brave, etc. That told young girls that these interests are valid, they are not lesser interests. Being feminine and liking traditionally feminine things does not make them weak.

[psychotrenny]

Devising a unified theory of oppression, a single model that neatly explains the common roots and structure of all social inequality, is probably intellectually satisfying but I don't think it has much utility. Like they rarely reflect reality in a consistently accurate way, or if they do it's only because they views things in the most broad and abstract way possible. Which means that even when they aren't "wrong" they still aren't useful. Like maybe you can fit a lot of concrete phenomena into this model, but it's not a good framework by which to analyse and better understand anything specific. And frankly performing actual analysis with these models doesn't even seem to be the intention; rarely do these sorts of "unified models" have much apparent interest in actual revolutionary action. These theories interpret the world in various ways; the point is not to change it

[coldpintglass]

Flatmate is in kitchen disscussing her latest doctors appointment with her mum and I’m sat here in my bedroom waiting for her to be done so I can make my own dinner

[enixamyram]

I hope we get some canon confirmation in the next Octavia episode, but for now:

(Feel free to reply/reblog with other ideas.)

[supernovaa-remnant]

Dream reads the journal and has a little crisis- maybe it's a handwritten poem collection Wil got somewhere? Maybe it means something totally different because of the different cultures??

While everyone else is absolutely failing at learning polish yes 😭 I can imagine the possibility of mistaking a different slavic language for polish or thinking that Wil is writing in a code xDDDD

everyone is going to tommy like "quick you and wilbur are brothers, right?? where did you grow up what language is that????" and tommy awkwardly has to reveal that he and wilbur aren't actually blood siblings and have actually only known each other for ~a year lmao

dream, like, takes a couple of the journal pages somehow ahdkjshdjsds and at some point sapnap finds him with it and becomes 100% convinced that wilbur and dream are plotting together which makes the entire server even more frantic in their attempts to figure out the language

meanwhile wilbur is, like, making collages and writing poetry (and freaking out when he realizes some pages are missing), techno is burdened with knowledge™ but finds the rest of the server's fumbling to be amusing, and dream is, like, reading the poetry every night trying to figure out what it means.

(at some point tommy & tubbo are sneaking into the community house to try and spy on dream to figure out whatever's going on, and they hear dream giggling and think it's, like, a maniacal laugh, but really dream is just flustered by wilbur's prose lmao)

[f1wags-opinions]

Prev anon fucks sake gotta realise that it's a sponsorship from a company who happens to make makeup. We gonna start gate keeping racing teams and drivers from companies who want to give them money? Like what difference does it make if the decals on the cars are makeup or technology or fucking tobacco? Truly wild take lmao???

I might be reaching but isn't that opinion trying to keep apart something that's feminine leaning like makeup and something that's perceived to be masculine leaning, like racing? Yknow, doing the very thing that is trying to be overcome, the whole separation of women from racing? Who the fuck cares if it's a makeup brand? What rules are there that stops let's say, a super rich hand bag company or a fashion company from sponsoring teams in racing? Fucks sake

I agree, but good lordt-

[bumpinbonnie]

Peak Bloom is such a lil nerd i love her

[britneyshakespeare]

if i were penelope rich née devereux and everybody in the gentry was talkin about me because of my stupid ex's sonnet sequence and word got back to me specifically of sonnet 37, where mother of god he had the audacity to write that i "had no misfortune but that rich [i was]" oh my lord the knives i would wanna stick in philip sidney's body. the gangrene couldn't come early enough for me

[psychotrenny]

While "Leftism" is a useful enough shorthand to describe a general tendency within a specific political context, it means absolutely nothing on it's own. Like you can use it when you want to quickly and broadly place something as "progressive", advocating more rapid and radical social changes in order to progress society away from its current set of contradictions. This has meaning when you can contrast it with "rightists", who could (depending on the specific context) seek more incremental change, preservation of the status quo or a retreat to a more entrenched version of it.

There are a number of ways in which one could employ these terms too. Like you could use it to describe those who exhibit these tendencies within a broader group or organisation, such as calling Bernie Sanders part of the "left wing" of the contemporary US DP while Leon Trotsky was a "leftist" within the CPSU of the mid 1920s. It could also describe individuals or organisations within a broader milieu (such as a nation's political scene); Noam Chomsky and Michael Parenti are both broadly "leftist" thinkers of the 21st century USA while the GPUS and PSL are both "leftist" parties within the same context.

As you can see from these wildly varying examples, terms like "leftists" are inherently vague and not always useful. A lot of examples of what people call "leftist infighting" are groups with inherently irreconcilable ideologies that just happen to fall, under current conditions, within the same broad political tendency; it makes no sense to talk as though that sort of "left unity" is inherently desirable or even possible. And "Leftism" certainly isn't an ideology in of itself, but merely a way of classifying them. Your ideology can make you a "Leftist", but "Leftism" cannot be your ideology.

[endlessreruns]

Stella: 👍👎 Heather

Like: collecting soft-body porcelain clown dolls

Dislike: being cold