#ferland magazine

[lunibees]

Lunes 23 de septiembre, 2024.

↓ English version below ↓

Monday, September 23rd 2024.

[auxbellesillustrationsfr]

Renée Claude en noir et blanc

Renée Claude et Pauline Julien sont deux idoles qui ont marqué notre jeunesse, je parle des baby-boomers il va sans dire. Ces deux chanteuses, différentes par leurs styles, symbolisaient le nouveau Québec en devenir. Les gars de ma génération, nous étions tous en pâmoison devant l’une et l’autre. André Ducharme ne dit-il pas, en préface, qu’il a « voulu l’épouser [Renée Claude] aux premières notes entendues à la télévision, au début des années 1960 » ?  

Le journaliste Mario Girard nous dévoile, dans cette biographie consacrée à Renée Claude, un pan de notre histoire culturelle récente. Car raconter cette grande interprète de la chanson, c’est évoquer les noms de Clémence Desrochers à Luc Plamondon, en passant par Mouffe, Michel Tremblay, Michel Robidoux, Stéphane Venne et plusieurs autres qui ont marqué notre patrimoine culturel.  

En février 2019, on apprenait que Renée Claude souffrait de la terrible maladie d’Alzheimer. Aussitôt a germé, dans la tête de quelques artistes, dont le producteur Nicolas Lemieux et l’animatrice radio Monique Giroux, l’idée d’un spectacle-hommage à cette grande dame de la chanson. Ce spectacle aura lieu à la Maison symphonique, avec la participation, entre autres, de Clémence Desrochers, Marie Denise Pelletier, Ariane Moffatt, Isabelle Boulay, Luce Dufault, Marie-Élaine Thibert, Kathleen Fortin.  

Renée Claude (de son vrai nom de famille Bélanger), née dans le quartier ouvrier du Plateau-Mont-Royal en 1939, un peu avant le déclenchement de la Seconde Guerre mondiale, est l’aînée d’une famille de six enfants. Sa mère, Cécile, plutôt extravertie, a toujours rêvé de devenir une artiste de la scène et sa fille Renée réalisera ce vœu à sa place. Sa mère l’inscrit, très jeune, à des cours de piano. Elle tient mordicus à ce que ses enfants aient une bonne éducation. Tous suivront des cours de diction et d’art dramatique au Conservatoire Lassalle, où Cécile a étudié vingt-cinq ans auparavant. Renée fréquentera cet établissement jusqu’à l’âge adulte.  

À seize ans, Renée rêve de devenir artiste. Elle a assisté, à sept reprises, au spectacle que Gilbert Bécaud donne au Théâtre Saint-Denis, au printemps 1955. Aussi participe-t-elle à différents concours d’amateurs. À deux reprises, elle remporte la palme. Sa mère « se laisse alors convaincre que sa fille a peut-être du talent », raconte son frère Michel. Elle commencera ainsi à chanter dans des cabarets, en matinée, toujours accompagnée de son père.  

Renée Claude est ambitieuse et elle n’abandonne jamais en cours de route un projet qui lui tient à cœur. Elle sait qu’elle ne peut que compter que sur ses propres moyens. Elle a décidé de devenir chanteuse et elle va donc se constituer un répertoire de chansons à la mesure de ses goûts : Ferré, Brassens, Béart, Aznavour…   

Raison de vivre  

Sa carrière professionnelle débutera après sa première audition à la télé de Radio-Canada. Dans la jeune vingtaine, elle chantera à quelques reprises à l’émission Chez Clémence, puis elle deviendra une habituée des studios de télévision et multipliera les entrevues dans des magazines culturels. Le public en redemande et son répertoire s’ouvre à d’autres créateurs. « La chanson populaire ne l’intéresse pas », nous dit son biographe. Pour Monique Giroux, elle fait partie de la « Sainte Trinité » des interprètes de l’époque, aux côtés de Pauline Julien et Monique Leyrac. Pour Michel Tremblay, ces trois artistes « avaient une intelligence du texte ». Pour François Dompierre, « ce sont elles qui ont le plus véhiculé la chanson québécoise à cette époque ».  

Si on la voit presque toujours vêtue de cette petite robe noire, c’est, explique la chanteuse, « pour forcer les gens à écouter mes chansons ». Elle a fait sienne la phrase de Cocteau : « L’élégance cesse si on la remarque. » Au début des années 1960, elle est sur la scène de toutes les boîtes à chansons, aux côtés des Leclerc, Vigneault, Clémence, Gauthier, Lévesque, Ferland, Brousseau, Lelièvre, Létourneau et autres Tex Lecor.  

Percer le mystère de cette fabuleuse interprète n’est pas chose facile. Mario Girard y réussit merveilleusement. On découvre une Renée Claude timide, fébrile, doutant toujours d’elle-même, mais décidée, parce que la chanson était sa raison de vivre.   

Un magnifique voyage dans le temps et un hommage nécessaire à cette interprète qui nous a tant chantés et enchantés.

https://ift.tt/3c4Zzha

from WordPress https://ift.tt/2xovtGK via IFTTT

[buckleyy--diazz]

11,27,24

11. favourite native writer/poet? Uhhh fave writer, Matthieu Simard definitely wrote some of my favorite books, 'Ça sent la coupe' being my fave. I've read it multiple times and I saw the movie based on it 2 times. I don't have a fave poet I would probably choose Albert Ferland since he is my great great great uncle, so just because he is family. 24. what other nation is joked about most often in your country? Probably the USA, I really don't know. 27. favourite national celebrity? Not national but she is my fave. Véronique Cloutier. She is a TV/radio host and she also have a Magazine. She used to work for Musique plus (more or less like Much Music/MTV) and she was my idol growing up(she still is lol) and she was also a customer where Inused to work so I had the chance to really get to know her and she is the most awesome person in the universe lol she is extremely down to earth and exactly like she is on TV. We were talking like we were friends and yeah, I really love her. Thanks for asking 😘😘😘

[annafd-blog1]

Analyse d’un magazine

Annaëlle Ferland

Je suis en équipe avec Alexandrine Marquier

Voici des captures d’écran du tableau réponse des questions #1 et #2

#3

Le magazine n’est pas nécessairement séparé en sections. Il y a un peu de tout partout: mode, bijou, parfum, produit de beauté, etc. Ceci est peut-être une technique pour faire en sorte que le lecteur fouille le magazine afin de trouver un autre article plus loin sur la mode.

#4 et #5

La plupart du temps, il y a une publicité après une page d’article concernant la mode et/ou les produits de beauté. Ceci concorde bien, car quand le lecteur lira l’article sur les produits de beauté, il voudra en avoir. Dès qu’il tournera la page, il verra une publicité sur un mascara, par exemple, alors cela l’incitera encore plus à acheter ce produit, puisqu’il en aura l’envie. Par ailleurs, les publicités de vêtements se retrouvent après les articles sur la mode. Les petites publicités se cachent parfois à travers les nombreux articles bref. Les publicités des grandes marques (ex: Covergirl, Joe Fresh, Guess, etc.) occupent une page complète, afin d’être l’élément principal de la page. Certaines, comme Maybelline, occupent une double-page, afin que quand le lecteur visionne les deux pages ouvertes en même temps, on voit uniquement le produit. D’autres, comme Miss Dior, occupe un carton recto-verso qui est facile à distinguer dans la revue. Ceci permet au lecteur d’atteindre facilement cette page et de voir la publicité ainsi que les deux articles, un qui précède, l’autre qui suit. Tout cela pour influencer encore plus le lecteur à acheter.

Décrivez l’objet

Type de papier: Papier glacé

Nombre de pages: 132 pages

Proportion entre les articles et les publicités: Il y a plus de publicité que d’articles. Il y a environ 2 publicités par 3 pages.

Couleur dominante: Il n’y a pas de couleur dominante, car chaque publicité a sa propre couleur

Couleurs codes: Les couleurs jaune, rouge et rose étaient récurrentes. On retrouvait le rouge et le rose dans le titre de certain article de mode ou de publicité. De plus, on retrouvait le jaune sur des titres en noir pour effectuer un effet de surlignage.

Couleur code: Il y a du rouge et du rose de la page couverture qui se retrouve à quelques places, en tout petit (ex: une écriture). Aussi, il y a des titres qui sont surlignés en jaune à quelques places. Cependant, il n’y en a pas beaucoup. Un simple lecteur ne remarquera peut-être pas nécessairement cette répétition.

Jeu de caractères: L’écriture utilisée pour les articles est la même partout, seulement avec quelques exceptions (par exemple des caractères gras, ou d’autres écritures plus originales pour faire ressortir des éléments).

Les photographies

#1 Il y a au moins une photographie par page pour les publicités et au moins 3 photos lorsqu’il s’agit d’un article de mode ou de célébrités. Donc, il y a environ 300 photos dans ce magazine de 132 pages.

#2 Il y a environ 30 photos représentant un visage en gros plan, souvent utiliser pour promouvoir du maquillage.

#3 Il y a environ 100 photographies en plan pied, elles sont souvent utilisés pour les articles sur la mode et sur les célébrités que l’on désire montrer de la tête au pied.

#4 Il y a environ 220 images de produits en raison des nombreuses publicités qui se retrouvent à chaque page. Le but de ce magazine est avant tout de promouvoir une multitude de produits, il est alors composé en majorité d’annonces.

#5 Il avait très peu de photos de paysage, de voyage ou de maison. Il y en avait environ 5 dans tout le magazine.

Réflexion (Annaëlle Ferland)

Selon moi, l’intérêt de ce magazine est de se faire de l’argent et des abonnés de plus. Son mandat pour accomplir ses intérêts est de faire de la publicité de plusieurs produits des compagnies différentes destinée aux adolescentes, comme des produits de beauté, du parfum, des accessoires et des vêtements. Ceci s’explique en partie par le fait qu’il y a une publicité à presque chaque page. Il y a très peu de page de texte, alors le but principal de ce magazine n’est pas de parler de l’actualité (les vedettes et la mode étant les sujets principaux), mais bien de vendre des produits en majorité destinés aux femmes. Alors, la revue est principalement destinée aux femmes, car le sujet dont il est question intéresse beaucoup moins les hommes. De ce fait, le public cible est très large et facilement influençable par les publicités, alors les éditeurs se feront beaucoup d’argent. Pour ce qui est des hommes, il y a peu de publicité destinée à eux (seulement quelques parfum), car ils savent que peu d’homme lira ce magazine. Les hommes s’intéressent plus aux sports, et non à la mode. 

Pour ma part, je pense que ce magazine accomplit bien son but, qui est de se faire plus d’argent et d’abonné, car il est rempli de publicité. Cependant, pour une personne comme moi, ce magazine n’est pas vraiment intéressant, car il y a peu d’articles pour m’enrichir et me donner des nouvelles de l’actualité, pourtant l’élément premier pour lequel j’achèterais ce magazine. Personnellement, je trouve que d’apparence, ce magazine est très attirant, car il y a beaucoup de couleurs et d’éléments. Alors plusieurs jeunes comme moi prendraient ce magazine pour son apparence, mais se lasseraient rapidement de le lire, car il n’y a pas beaucoup d’informations et beaucoup plus de publicité.

[haase5338pat]

Champions League Highlights | Bleacher Report | Latest News, Videos and Highlights

Uefa champions league highlights today - Highlights | UEFA Champions League |

Watch the best of leaguue action as Mason Mount's fine opener set Chelsea on their way to a first-leg advantage in Seville. Watch the best of the action from the City of Manchester Stadium as a late Phil Foden strike gave the hosts a lead to take into the second leg in Germany.

See how Bayern eased into the last eight with a comfortable aggregate success. Watch the best highlibhts the action from Stamford Bridge where goals by Hakim Ziyech and Emerson secured the hosts their ticket for the quarter-finals.

A stunning Kevin De Bruyne strike was the highlight as Manchester City coasted into the quarter-finals. Watch that goal and the best of the rest of the action now. Karim Benzema and Sergio Ramos were among the goals as Real Madrid comfortably made it into the last eight.

Watch Erling Haaland's double as Dortmund made it into the last eight with a aggregate success. Watch the leaguw of the action as champkons stunning cuampions Ferland Mendy strike gave Real Tdoay a first leg advantage against ten-man Atalanta.

See how Manchester City got a highligyts on this round of 16 tie thanks to goals by Bernardo Silva and Gabriel Jesus. Watch Olivier Giroud's spectacular winner and the best of the rest of the action as Chelsea got a first-leg edge in this round of 16 tie. See how the holders took command of this round of 16 tie, with Robert Lewandowski and year-old Uefa champions league highlights today Musiala amongst the goals. See how Porto gained a first leg advantage in this round of 16 clash thanks to uefa champions league highlights today strikes in both uefa champions league highlights today. Watch the best of the action from Spain where a Erling Haaland double gave the visitors a first leg edge.

For the best possible experience, we recommend using ChromeFirefox or Microsoft Edge. Favourite club. Filter by Filter. Tel-Aviv Man. City Man. An click for source occurred while playing the video Next Video.

Now playing Highlights: Bayern Paris 2 mins.

Highlights: Bayern 2-3 Paris (2 mins)

Highlights: Porto Chelsea 2 mins Watch the best of the action as Mason Mount's fine opener set Chelsea on their way to a first-leg advantage in Seville.

Now playing Highlights: Porto Chelsea 2 mins. Highlights: Manchester City Dortmund 2 mins Watch the best of the action from the City of Manchester Stadium as a late Phil Foden strike gave the hosts a lead to take into the second leg in Germany. Log in. Champions League Magazine - Episode UCL Highlights - Episode Extended highlights: Porto Chelsea.

Davies - We had a lot of chances to beat Uefa champions league highlights today tonight. Mbappe - I love tooday play against the best in the world. Highlights - Porto Chelsea. Highlights Uefa champions league highlights today - Real Madrid Liverpool.

Champions League Video - Highlights, Goals & Interviews

Highlights - Manchester City Borussia Dortmund. Highlights - Man City Barcelona Agg Highlights - Wolfsburg Chelsea Agg Extended highlights Log in. Full match replays Log in. Goals and best moments Unlikely hero Chilwell bags huge second for Chelsea.

It has uefa champions league highlights today coming! Muller equalises for Bayern.

[alexm26]

Tempête d’idées (Magazine)

1-    Quels sont vos intérêts?

Nos intérêts sont commerciaux et d’actualité. Nous voulons faire de la publicité de produits et inciter les lecteurs à s’abonner à notre magazine et à l’acheter. Nous allons mettre quelques articles pour remplir les trous entre les publicités.

2-    Quel est votre public cible?

Notre public cible s’adresse aux adolescentes.

3-    Comment allez-vous le rejoindre? (stratégies, intention de communication)

Nous allons rejoindre notre public cible en présentant des articles concernant des problèmes de filles (exemple : l’acné), suivie de publicités de produits de beauté (ex : crème) qui ont un lien avec les articles présentés. Nous voudrions aussi présenter un article sur des vedettes fictives et la mode avec une publicité sur la mode.  

4-    Titre de magazine

Pour l’instant, nous pensons le nommer Fillactualité.

5-    Participants

Annaëlle Ferland et Alexandrine Marquier sont en équipe. Nous voulons faire un minimum de 3 pages chaque.

[thrashermaxey]

Ramblings: Keeper Bubble Players – my dilemmas, your dilemmas, let’s hash this out (July23)

Working hard on the Fantasy Guide. It’s out on August 1 but you can always pre-order it. I’m about halfway through now. Two weeks to do the first half, eight days to do the second half. Just another year in Fantasy Guide Land.

*

Welcome to DobberHockey’s first annual Keeper Bubble Week. I took the deadest week of the summer and factored in that many leagues have their keeper deadlines fast approaching, and decided to have all the columnists dedicate their work and analysis to a single theme – the bubble players. Keep ‘em or drop ‘em? I’ll get to those below. First, let’s take a quick look around the hockey world…

*

You may recall a few weeks ago when I discussed players who have babies and the impact that it has on their season, particularly with their second child (link on that is here). Getzlaf was a great example – his season after his second baby was terrible. Last year Cam Talbot’s wife had twins. I’ll let you draw your own conclusions on what happened to him in 2017-18 after that. Further to this, guess who had a baby on the weekend? Alex Pietrangelo. Guess who else had a baby? Alex Pietrangelo. Also, guess who had a baby on the weekend? Alex Pietrangelo. I’m not repeating myself, the guy actually welcomed triplets into the world! Congratulations to the Pietrangelo family, but let’s look at this from a fantasy hockey standpoint – if you think having three infants in the house in August, September and October will have no impact on his training schedule, then you’ve never had kids.

Look at this way – if Pietrangelo has a great season in 2018-19, then we’ll know he’s a pretty neglectful father! All kidding aside, I think even with a nanny to help, you still love your kids and you want to spend time with them especially during the first few months. It’s going to have an impact. I haven’t reviewed St. Louis yet, but whatever my formula pits out for Pietrangelo, I’m rolling it back an additional five or six points (and just hope it doesn’t get any worse than that).

*

Jacob Trouba was awarded $5.5 million in arbitration on a one-year deal. He becomes the second highest paid defenseman on the Jets. If feel more bullish about him if he didn’t miss at least 17 games in four of his last five seasons. He saw the second most ice time on the entire team last season (average per game), but was third on the totem pole behind Dustin Byfuglien and Tyler Myers in terms of PP time. Now that he’s making more than Myers and the Jets could lose Myers to free agency next year, I think you’ll see that flip-flop. Trouba’s PP time should get a boost. If only I could feel comfortable projecting 80 games out of the guy, I’d feel so much better about him.

*

ANNOUNCEMENT: The Frozen Tools upgrade has completed the next big step. The Report Generator is now up. Instant load. All the reports. Take a look here. Get any data you want, and we’re taking suggestions on more in the forum. If there’s info you need and we don’t have it – we’ll get it.

*

BUBBLE WEEK!

First, my three leagues. Three different sets of rules, three different strategies, I’ll offer up my thinking.

LEAGUE 1 – Entering its 29th season. The most basic of my leagues – 20 players, 13 teams, keep everyone, top 12 players for points counts, points get traded with the player, and keep the same rosters for the NHL postseason where again the top 12 players count.

I pick 10th and 23rd. Team: Ovechkin, Marchand, Backstrom, Panarin, Granlund, Marchessault, Arvidsson, Tolvanen, Drouin, Zucker, Labanc, Atkinson, Johnson, Palat, Kovalchuk, Coyle, Killorn, Koivu, Marleau, Spezza

Bubble players: Killorn, Koivu, Marleau and Spezza

Decision: This one is obvious because I already set up my team for the draft back at the trade deadline. Marleau was acquired strictly for playoffs (which I won) and Spezza was a throw-in. Those two are gone. Sure, Marleau could get 45 points on this upgraded Toronto team, but so can Killorn and I think Killorn has more upside and is younger. Koivu also has more upside, though if there was a draft pick available and a player I like at the draft I’d be very comfortable just dropping Koivu and making the pick.

LEAGUE 2 – The ‘Forecaster’ League, with the group that puts together the magazine. I joined it in 2008 and won three straight from I think it was 2012-2014. But haven’t won in a bit. This one is Keep 12, points-only but extra bonus for Hits, SOG and PPPts. No playoffs. Regular hockey rosters (4C, 8W, 6D, 2G 4 bench, IR). I have lots of draft picks, all in the first 8 rounds.

Keeping: MacKinnon, Johansen, Granlund, W. Karlsson, Keller, Carlson, Klingberg, Gardiner, Talbot, Bishop, Hellebuyck.

Already dropped: Wennberg, Maroon, Aberg, Koivu, Gaudette, Little, Valimaki, Oleksiak, Ferland, Petersen.

Bubble: Atkinson, E. Lindholm, Montour for the final Keeper.

Other assets: L. Andersson, Frost, Heinen, Matheson, Tuch

Strategy – First of all, I have an Excel file that each of you should also have. It lists my players – each league has its own tab. And the players are listed in order of their value to me. At a quick glance I can always evaluate what I can afford to give up. It’s just a great way to evaluate your situation.

Second, I hate dropping players. If possible, I try to use them as sweeteners to other deals. Short of that, if a player is on the bubble I might be fine with trading a keeper for a draft pick, and replace that keeper with a bubble player. And that’s what I did here. I received an offer of a fifth round pick for Jake Gardiner. I had him upgrade the pick to the fourth round and did the deal. Brandon Montour has now been moved from the “Bubble” section to the “Keeping” section. I’ve already done Anaheim in the Guide and can tell you that I projected 41 points for him. I’m guessing Gardiner will be low-50s when I get to the Leafs. But Montour had 27 more shots, 45 more hits and three fewer PPPts. I’m guessing all three of those numbers get better for Montour in the year ahead and according to our league rules, the guess is that these two players will turn out to be equal or pretty close to it. And I just gained a fourth.

Now I have to choose between Cam Atkinson and Elias Lindholm, who I firmly believe will be Johnny Hockey’s new linemate. Atkinson had 33 points in his last 33 games and he’ll have a great season with Artemi Panarin. However, Panarin is looking like he’ll be traded. Furthermore, Atkinson’s value is hidden. As in – nobody is going to draft him in the first round. I can drop him and then draft him in the second round (if Panarin stays) or the fourth round (if Panarin is traded). So that’s my plan. But until that point, I’ll be trying to work in a trade. I hate wasting assets.

LEAGUE 3 – Keep everyone, rosters are 33 players, 15-team league, top 12 forwards, top 4 defensemen, top 2 goalies count for points-only.

I’m not going to list my roster as it’s too big. I’ll just reiterate that I hate just dropping a guy. I’ll have no choice on two obvious ones in Nathan Beaulieu and Nick Bonino. But other players I didn’t like I felt I could get something for them. First I traded Jordan Staal and Richard Panik for third- and fourth-round picks (it’s a four-round draft). Staal is Staal – you know exactly what you’re getting and that’s not going to get better or worse anytime soon. Panik is a wildcard. He’s averaged 40 points the last two seasons and he’s 27 years old. But he had 15 points in the last 20 games and Arizona has a good-looking top nine now. I have in the Fantasy Guide 42 points for Panik, with line combos that look like this:

Panik – Derek Stepan – Clayton Keller

Christian Fischer – Alex Galchenyuk – Vinnie Hinostroza

Brendan Perlini – Christian Dvorak – Michael Grabner

Because I don’t think Panik’s upside is any higher than 60 points at best, getting a third for him I felt was good value. Especially when I’m the one using the pick. My last few third rounders: Lehkonen (2017), Sheary (2017), Brossoit (2017), DeBrincat (2017), Grimaldi (2016), Gostisbehere (2016). That’s not a bad track record, even with the warts!

Then I traded Aaron Dell, Lars Eller and Jordan Weal. All three were on the bubble for me – and now all three are off my team. I got a second and a third for them. I had been hoping Dell would sign with Detroit or Buffalo and as soon as he signed with San Jose, I didn’t want him anymore. Martin Jones just starts his new contract this season, so he’s locked in no matter how bad he is (I think he’s bad). Eller’s best years are still ahead of him, in my opinion, but that’s not saying much. I think he’ll get 40 points this year, but with upside for 55 if Kuznetsov or Backstrom get hurt for 20 games or more. We’ve seen him flourish when he sneaks onto that top PP unit. As for Weal, I just didn’t like his chances. I haven’t given up all hope as he always seems to overachieve and I really like those players. But I can do better with a good draft pick and his inclusion helped me get a second rounder instead of another third.

The last move I made (so far) was actually going the other way. But only because there was a deal to be had. A GM made his bubble players available and I took a stab at getting two of his best for my lowest draft pick (a future fourth rounder). That got me Jaret Anderson-Dolan and Samuel Montembeault. I think I would draft JAD in the third round in September, so that’s a deal right there. And Montembeault is a bubble player – I’d probably draft him fourth, but that’s not set in stone and dependent on the goalie options out there. I like Montembeault but he’s three years away at least. Two years of no help at all, followed by a year or two as a backup. And that’s if it works out.

Jaret Anderson-Dolan (more on him here) is a sure-fire NHLer. But will he be second-line 60-point guy with upside for 70? Or a third-line 45-point guy? I don’t think he has a long wait time. Maybe a year away. I like that about him.

*

I went to Twitter for your Bubble questions. A bubble player varies from league to league, but when you start having to decide between Tarasenko and Voracek, or Draisaitl vs. Pastrnak – I don’t consider it a keeper league! There’s no wrong answer! Try flipping a coin. (Note: I answered these ones right on Twitter)

If your league is a Keep 3, a Keep 5, or even a Keep 8 – to me that’s a one-year league where you get to hold onto a couple of guys. True keeper leagues allow you to actually recognize your roster from one year to the next because you get to keep 10, 12, 15, 20 or even all of your players. Keeper leagues!

With that in mind, here are some Twitter queries:

{source}<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-cards="hidden" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Who’s got a better likelyhood of holding a top six spot, Beauvillier or Athanasiou?</p>— Barry Miles (@barryhmiles) <a href="https://twitter.com/barryhmiles/status/1021168514659385345?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 22, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>{/source}

Athanasiou’s fancy stats indicate that he can really make an impact and put up first-line points on Detroit, perhaps even better than Gustav Nyquist. And he probably deserves that spot over Nyquist. But zero chance that happens. This is another stepping-stone year for Athanasiou. So my answer is Anthony Beauvillier. If Jan Kovar fails to make things happen in the NHL as a top sixer, then Beauvillier will get his chance. And then, whether or not he makes that chance work is up to him. If Kovar clicks, then Beauvillier is a depth guy again. So in that sense, Athanasiou is a safer play. I have Athanasiou for 42 points. Nice and safe. So this question becomes – do you want safe, or do you want to swing for the fences?

{source}<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-cards="hidden" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">12 team keeper pool, keep 10 ..  G/A/PPG/PPA/+-/PIMS/BLKS/Hits    my final 2 spots are  between Shea Weber , Shatts, Koneckny and  ROR <br><br>Thanks</p>— REALMUTT (@REALMUTT1) <a href="https://twitter.com/REALMUTT1/status/1021162914923679745?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 22, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>{/source}

Kevin Shattenkirk and Ryan O’Reilly. No way I keep Shea Weber.

{source}<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-cards="hidden" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">12 teams keep 15. G/A/P/PPP/S/H/W/GAA/S%. Keep 4 of the following- Perron Stastny Stepan Bailey Zetterberg Bjugstad Weber E Staal OReilly Lundqvist.</p>— Sean Liebich (@seanliebich) <a href="https://twitter.com/seanliebich/status/1021160832082722816?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 22, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>{/source}

Eric Staal and Ryan O’Reilly are the obvious keeps. I like Derek Stepan and Josh Bailey over the other forwards there. I already spoke about Weber. I believe Bailey will get the star treatment now that he’s coming off a big year, even losing Tavares I think he’s still safe for 55 points. A contract like the one he signed will see to it that he gets optimal linemates and PP time. And Stepan has a great supporting cast around him and is safe for 52-55 points. However, if you are hurting for goalies, then you have to keep Henrik Lundqvist over Stepan. But if you have two other good ones, then King Henrik can go.

{source}<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-cards="hidden" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">$100 cap auction league. G,A, points, Ppg, shg, I have to choose one of E. Lindholm, Hertl or Konecny for $3 I’m struggling hard with it. Thanks</p>— Kyle Webb (@KyleWebb03) <a href="https://twitter.com/KyleWebb03/status/1021136988743794688?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 22, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>{/source}

I like these choices as it embraces three players who ‘could’ break out in the year ahead. But I am the most bullish on Elias Lindholm so that’s my selection here.

{source}<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-cards="hidden" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Cap Keeper League 6F 4D 1G <br>G A PIM SOG PPG PPA Hits Blocks<br><br>Keep one “prospect” <br><br>Jake Virtanen vs. Timo Meier</p>— Geoff Boldgloom (@geoffboldgloom) <a href="https://twitter.com/geoffboldgloom/status/1021131975275380737?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 22, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>{/source}

This one is only close because Jake Virtanen has so much potential in terms of hits. I would still keep Timo Meier here.

{source}<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-cards="hidden" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Points only.  1g, 3d, 9f.  Auto protected until game #83 for prospects.  Finished 17th and 18th out of 18 in last 2 seasons.  Protect 10.  Final 2 spots between C Coyle, Klefbom, Hanifin, Matheson, Zacha. Must protect at least 1 D out of this list.</p>— Alexandre Lussier (@lusshouse) <a href="https://twitter.com/lusshouse/status/1021117363918376961?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 22, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>{/source}

This one is incredibly hard. And I’m only looking at the defensemen here, as they are harder to replace in-season. So between Mike Matheson – huge upside and I’m so very certain he will eventually get there, but it will be another ‘stepping stone’ year for him (projection: 35 points). Nick Hanifin – on a new team, steadily improving, should be a safe play for low-40s (I project him for 44 this year), but doesn’t have Matheson’s upside. Oscar Klefbom – still Edmonton’s only option for PP QB and could ‘get it’ at any moment (projection: 38 points for this season). I think my two picks here will be Matheson and Hanifin – one for immediate results and the other for future results.

*

One more note – I’m hard at work on the Guide, so once again I’m late with the Goalie Rankings. They’ll be out in early August.

*

See you next Monday. Enjoy Keeper Bubble Week!

  from All About Sports https://dobberhockey.com/hockey-rambling/ramblings-keeper-bubble-players-my-dilemmas-your-dilemmas-lets-hash-this-out-july23/

[annafd-blog1]

Tempête d’idées (magazine)

1-    Quels sont vos intérêts?

Nos intérêts sont commerciaux et d’actualité. Nous voulons faire de la publicité de produits et inciter les lecteurs à s’abonner à notre magazine et à l’acheter. Nous allons mettre quelques articles pour remplir les trous entre les publicités.

2-    Quel est votre public cible?

Notre public cible s’adresse aux adolescentes.

3-    Comment allez-vous le rejoindre? (stratégies, intention de communication)

Nous allons rejoindre notre public cible en présentant des articles concernant des problèmes de filles (exemple : l’acné), suivie de publicités de produits de beauté (ex : crème) qui ont un lien avec les articles présentés. Nous voudrions aussi présenter un article sur des vedettes fictives et la mode avec une publicité sur la mode.  

4-    Titre de magazine

Pour l’instant, nous pensons le nommer Fillactualité.

5-    Participants

Annaëlle Ferland et Alexandrine Marquier sont en équipe. Nous voulons faire un minimum de 3 pages chaque.