#discrimination lawyer thousand oaks

[harriskaufma]

How Employment Lawyers in Westlake Village Can Help You

Employment lawyers in Westlake Village play a crucial role in safeguarding the rights of employees and guiding employers through complex labor laws. They offer valuable legal advice, helping individuals understand their rights under employment law and employers comprehend their obligations. These professionals can also represent clients in legal disputes, including wage and hour disputes, workplace discrimination, and harassment cases. They bring their expertise in negotiation and advocacy to protect their client's interests. Whether you're an employee seeking justice for unfair treatment or an employer needing guidance on legal compliance, an employment lawyer in Westlake Village can provide the necessary legal assistance.

What is Employment Law

Employment law is a broad area that governs the relationship between employers and employees. It covers several topics such as employee rights, employer responsibilities, workplace safety, discrimination, and more.

Understanding Employment Law

Employment law is a comprehensive legal field that governs the relationships between employers and employees. It covers a wide range of topics, including but not limited to, employee rights, employer responsibilities, workplace safety, discrimination, and employment contracts. The fundamental purpose of employment law is to set a fair and safe environment in the workplace. It establishes minimum standards for working conditions, wages, hours, and protects employees from unfair treatment such as harassment or discrimination. Understanding employment law is crucial for both employees, to know their rights and protections, and employers, to ensure they are fulfilling their legal obligations and maintaining a lawful working environment.

The Basics of Employment Law

Employment law provides a framework for fair treatment in the workplace. It sets minimum standards for pay, hours, and prevents discrimination and harassment.

Importance of Employment Law

Without these laws, employees could be subject to exploitation or mistreatment. It also helps businesses understand their legal obligations towards their employees.

Role of Employment Lawyers in Westlake Village

Employment lawyers play a crucial role in interpreting and applying employment laws. They can provide legal advice, represent clients in disputes, and ensure compliance with various labor laws.

Legal Advice and Guidance

Employee Rights and Employer Obligations

Employment lawyers can explain employees' rights under employment law or help them understand the terms of an employment contract. For employers, they can advise on legal obligations when hiring or firing employees or ensuring compliance with workplace safety regulations.

Legal Representation

Employment lawyers can represent clients in legal disputes, from negotiating settlements in discrimination cases to representing clients in court during litigation.

Notable Employment Lawyers and Law Firms in Westlake Village

Westlake Village boasts several highly-rated employment lawyers and law firms.

The Kaufman Law Firm

The Kaufman Law Firm provides legal representation for various types of employment law cases in Los Angeles and Westlake Village.

How to Choose the Right Employment Lawyer

Choosing the right employment lawyer in Westlake Village is crucial. Factors to consider include experience, expertise, client reviews, and lawyer ratings.

Experience and Expertise

Look for lawyers who specialize in employment law and have a track record of successfully handling cases similar to yours.

Client Reviews and Lawyer Ratings

Check client reviews and lawyer ratings to get an idea of the lawyer's reputation and performance.

Final Thoughts

Employment lawyers play a vital role in ensuring fair treatment in the workplace. Whether you're an employee seeking to understand your rights or an employer needing guidance on legal obligations, an experienced employment lawyer in Westlake Village can provide the assistance you need.

[nancyedimick]

Short Circuit: A roundup of recent federal court decisions

(Here is the latest edition of the Institute for Justice’s weekly Short Circuit newsletter, written by John Ross.)

The growing bipartisan movement to rein in occupational licensing has claimed some important victories in recent weeks, writes IJ Communications Associate Nick Sibilla at Forbes.com, with the repeal of restrictions on hair braiders in New Hampshire and shampooers in Tennessee. Read more here.

Feds: Honest folks don’t accumulate stockpiles of cash or have family members schlep stockpiles on trains. Thus, a couple (charged with no crime) from whom we seek to forfeit $17.9k must have obtained it illicitly — or at least they haven’t shown they obtained it licitly. D.C. Circuit: It’s for a jury of laypeople to decide whether the couple’s story is really so suspicious.

Nazis loot Hungarian baron’s fine art collection. Do U.S. courts have jurisdiction to consider his heirs’ suit seeking recovery of or compensation for the trove, some of which is now displayed in several Hungarian museums? D.C. Circuit: Yes, for some of the pieces. For the rest — maybe. (Your editorial staff found the district court’s opinion interesting as well.)

Veteran coal miner believes biometric hand scanning, a newly introduced measure to track miners’ work hours, puts him in league with the Antichrist. He retires rather than submit to such scans. EEOC: The company failed to accommodate his sincere religious beliefs. Fourth Circuit: Pay him back wages but no need for punitive damages.

That (among other things) a Langley Park, Md. brothel made use of condoms manufactured out of state means the robbery of said brothel implicates interstate commerce, says the Fourth Circuit, so the robbery is a federal case.

Texas dentists who specialize in implant dentistry, dental anesthesiology, oral medicine, and orofacial pain would like to advertise that fact, but Texas law prohibits using the word “specialist” to refer to anything other than one of nine specialties recognized by the ADA. Fifth Circuit: Which is an unconstitutional restriction on commercial speech.

Plaintiff: The Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause automatically waives the gov’t’s sovereign immunity, which means I get to bring my takings suit wherever I want. Fifth Circuit: You might think so, but binding precedent says the opposite, which means you belong in the Court of Federal Claims, not here.

Former inmates: Marion County, Ind., jail officials regularly delayed our release for up to three days — in part because officials used a computer system that didn’t work with the court and police systems; certify our class action. (Fun fact: That computer system was a gift from the jail’s phone company, which charged high rates for calls that generated beaucoup profits for the phone company and the sheriff.) District court: We’ll certify some of the subclasses, but not all. Seventh Circuit: We’ll certify all.

Putnam County, Ind., officer (6’3”, 270lbs) is convicted of excessive force for beating up restrained, compliant arrestees in two separate instances. Seventh Circuit (2016): The district court needs to reconsider or better explain its far-below-guidelines sentence of 14 months. Seventh Circuit (2017): Again, 14 months seems lenient given the officer’s prior conviction for beating up a three-year-old.

Allegation: Oak Lawn, Ill., strip mall owner displeases politically connected tenant; village officials force the owner to remedy nonexistent code violations to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars — ultimately forcing him into foreclosure. Seventh Circuit: His deadline to sue the village accrued when the foreclosure process began, not when it concluded.

Peoria, Ill., police officer interviewing for specialty assignment (pursuing asset forfeitures) declines to answer any questions until she has read aloud a “nine-page manifesto.” She does not get the gig. Seventh Circuit: She may not press her sex-discrimination or other claims.

Rancher tells officer looking for missing cattle that “if you can step foot on [my] property, mister, you’re not going to be walking away.” North Dakota jury: Which was not a true threat but protected free speech. Eighth Circuit: The officer’s subsequent tasing of the rancher did not constitute excessive force.

Plaintiff lends her car to her brother-in-law. Yikes! His license is suspended; cops impound the car. She tenders valid license and proof of ownership. LAPD: Sorry, we’re impounding this baby for 30 days, in accordance with policy meant to punish unlicensed drivers. Ninth Circuit: That’s a seizure. Maybe also a taking. Her suit should not have been dismissed.

Allegation: An IRS investigator used threats of criminal prosecution to dragoon innocent tax preparers into using their own money as bait in a sting operation to catch scammers fraudulently seeking tax refunds. The sting works, but meanwhile the preparers are out $2 million dollars and have been forced into bankruptcy. Is the IRS immune from suit? Not nearly as immune as it thinks it is, says this Ninth Circuit panel.

Student: School officials failed to investigate a rape committed by basketball player (and son of a former NFL player) of another student, after which he raped me, too. Tenth Circuit: No Title IX violation. The school wasn’t required to investigate the earlier [alleged] rape, because only campus security officers knew about it.

In light of his mental-health issues and general immaturity, a sentence of 70 days (plus five years supervised release) is not unreasonable for a 24-year-old who kidnapped his ex-girlfriend at BB-gunpoint, handcuffed her, and drove her to another state blindfolded in an effort to win her hand in marriage, says two-thirds of a Tenth Circuit panel.

Environmentalists: Mismanagement of the Okeechobee Waterway, which runs from Florida’s Atlantic coast to the Gulf of Mexico, results in algal blooms that kill off wildlife in surrounding waterways and taint drinking water. District court: The Army Corps of Engineers, which manages the waterway, enjoys sovereign immunity. Eleventh Circuit: These issues can’t be litigated without the South Florida Water Management District (a state agency) as a party, and, as it’s immune from suit in federal courts, the case can’t go at all.

Plaintiff: Defendant, a lawyer, maintains email accounts that serve no purpose but to receive spam, over which he files meritless suits if his demands for compensation are not met. He filed such a suit against us; we seek recompense. Defendant: The plaintiff — an entity doing business under a fictitious name traceable to a dissolved company that purports to have transferred all its assets to a third entity — doesn’t have standing. California court: Plaintiff’s suit should not have been dismissed.

In March, the Eleventh Circuit ruled that IJ client Mary Lou Wesselhoeft could truthfully label her skim milk as “skim milk,” even though it did not meet the gov’t’s definition. Florida regulators had previously insisted that Mary Lou either add additives, which would contradict her all-natural philosophy, or call her skim milk “imitation milk product,” which would be ridiculous. As of last week, her skim milk is back on the market. Hear, hear for commercial speech! Learn more about the case.

Originally Found On: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/06/26/short-circuit-a-roundup-of-recent-federal-court-decisions-61/

[wolfandpravato]

Short Circuit: A roundup of recent federal court decisions

(Here is the latest edition of the Institute for Justice’s weekly Short Circuit newsletter, written by John Ross.)

The growing bipartisan movement to rein in occupational licensing has claimed some important victories in recent weeks, writes IJ Communications Associate Nick Sibilla at Forbes.com, with the repeal of restrictions on hair braiders in New Hampshire and shampooers in Tennessee. Read more here.

Feds: Honest folks don’t accumulate stockpiles of cash or have family members schlep stockpiles on trains. Thus, a couple (charged with no crime) from whom we seek to forfeit $17.9k must have obtained it illicitly — or at least they haven’t shown they obtained it licitly. D.C. Circuit: It’s for a jury of laypeople to decide whether the couple’s story is really so suspicious.

Nazis loot Hungarian baron’s fine art collection. Do U.S. courts have jurisdiction to consider his heirs’ suit seeking recovery of or compensation for the trove, some of which is now displayed in several Hungarian museums? D.C. Circuit: Yes, for some of the pieces. For the rest — maybe. (Your editorial staff found the district court’s opinion interesting as well.)

Veteran coal miner believes biometric hand scanning, a newly introduced measure to track miners’ work hours, puts him in league with the Antichrist. He retires rather than submit to such scans. EEOC: The company failed to accommodate his sincere religious beliefs. Fourth Circuit: Pay him back wages but no need for punitive damages.

That (among other things) a Langley Park, Md. brothel made use of condoms manufactured out of state means the robbery of said brothel implicates interstate commerce, says the Fourth Circuit, so the robbery is a federal case.

Texas dentists who specialize in implant dentistry, dental anesthesiology, oral medicine, and orofacial pain would like to advertise that fact, but Texas law prohibits using the word “specialist” to refer to anything other than one of nine specialties recognized by the ADA. Fifth Circuit: Which is an unconstitutional restriction on commercial speech.

Plaintiff: The Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause automatically waives the gov’t’s sovereign immunity, which means I get to bring my takings suit wherever I want. Fifth Circuit: You might think so, but binding precedent says the opposite, which means you belong in the Court of Federal Claims, not here.

Former inmates: Marion County, Ind., jail officials regularly delayed our release for up to three days — in part because officials used a computer system that didn’t work with the court and police systems; certify our class action. (Fun fact: That computer system was a gift from the jail’s phone company, which charged high rates for calls that generated beaucoup profits for the phone company and the sheriff.) District court: We’ll certify some of the subclasses, but not all. Seventh Circuit: We’ll certify all.

Putnam County, Ind., officer (6’3”, 270lbs) is convicted of excessive force for beating up restrained, compliant arrestees in two separate instances. Seventh Circuit (2016): The district court needs to reconsider or better explain its far-below-guidelines sentence of 14 months. Seventh Circuit (2017): Again, 14 months seems lenient given the officer’s prior conviction for beating up a three-year-old.

Allegation: Oak Lawn, Ill., strip mall owner displeases politically connected tenant; village officials force the owner to remedy nonexistent code violations to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars — ultimately forcing him into foreclosure. Seventh Circuit: His deadline to sue the village accrued when the foreclosure process began, not when it concluded.

Peoria, Ill., police officer interviewing for specialty assignment (pursuing asset forfeitures) declines to answer any questions until she has read aloud a “nine-page manifesto.” She does not get the gig. Seventh Circuit: She may not press her sex-discrimination or other claims.

Rancher tells officer looking for missing cattle that “if you can step foot on [my] property, mister, you’re not going to be walking away.” North Dakota jury: Which was not a true threat but protected free speech. Eighth Circuit: The officer’s subsequent tasing of the rancher did not constitute excessive force.

Plaintiff lends her car to her brother-in-law. Yikes! His license is suspended; cops impound the car. She tenders valid license and proof of ownership. LAPD: Sorry, we’re impounding this baby for 30 days, in accordance with policy meant to punish unlicensed drivers. Ninth Circuit: That’s a seizure. Maybe also a taking. Her suit should not have been dismissed.

Allegation: An IRS investigator used threats of criminal prosecution to dragoon innocent tax preparers into using their own money as bait in a sting operation to catch scammers fraudulently seeking tax refunds. The sting works, but meanwhile the preparers are out $2 million dollars and have been forced into bankruptcy. Is the IRS immune from suit? Not nearly as immune as it thinks it is, says this Ninth Circuit panel.

Student: School officials failed to investigate a rape committed by basketball player (and son of a former NFL player) of another student, after which he raped me, too. Tenth Circuit: No Title IX violation. The school wasn’t required to investigate the earlier [alleged] rape, because only campus security officers knew about it.

In light of his mental-health issues and general immaturity, a sentence of 70 days (plus five years supervised release) is not unreasonable for a 24-year-old who kidnapped his ex-girlfriend at BB-gunpoint, handcuffed her, and drove her to another state blindfolded in an effort to win her hand in marriage, says two-thirds of a Tenth Circuit panel.

Environmentalists: Mismanagement of the Okeechobee Waterway, which runs from Florida’s Atlantic coast to the Gulf of Mexico, results in algal blooms that kill off wildlife in surrounding waterways and taint drinking water. District court: The Army Corps of Engineers, which manages the waterway, enjoys sovereign immunity. Eleventh Circuit: These issues can’t be litigated without the South Florida Water Management District (a state agency) as a party, and, as it’s immune from suit in federal courts, the case can’t go at all.

Plaintiff: Defendant, a lawyer, maintains email accounts that serve no purpose but to receive spam, over which he files meritless suits if his demands for compensation are not met. He filed such a suit against us; we seek recompense. Defendant: The plaintiff — an entity doing business under a fictitious name traceable to a dissolved company that purports to have transferred all its assets to a third entity — doesn’t have standing. California court: Plaintiff’s suit should not have been dismissed.

In March, the Eleventh Circuit ruled that IJ client Mary Lou Wesselhoeft could truthfully label her skim milk as “skim milk,” even though it did not meet the gov’t’s definition. Florida regulators had previously insisted that Mary Lou either add additives, which would contradict her all-natural philosophy, or call her skim milk “imitation milk product,” which would be ridiculous. As of last week, her skim milk is back on the market. Hear, hear for commercial speech! Learn more about the case.

Originally Found On: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/06/26/short-circuit-a-roundup-of-recent-federal-court-decisions-61/

[jessicaklump-blog]

Rose Law Files Federal Lawsuit Against Aero Automatic Sprinkler Company

SAN JOSE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--In a federal class action lawsuit filed last month, six professional fire sprinkler fitters who worked for Aero Automatic Sprinkler Company, a subsidiary of Kiewit Corporation, allege they were denied payment under the California Labor Code of minimum prevailing wages, overtime wages, travel, daily subsistence, health and welfare payments for work on at least five large commercial construction projects. Rose Law also alleges the workers were denied mandatory rest periods, and Aero failed to employ apprentice fire sprinkler fitters on the public works projects, as required by California law. According to Rose Law, Aero Automatic Sprinkler Company has its principal place of business in Phoenix, Arizona, maintains a branch office California, and performs sprinkler work all over the United States. Aero is wholly owned by Kiewit Corporation, an international construction, engineering and mining company with North American headquarters in Omaha, Nebraska. Kiewit is one of the largest construction companies in the world. Aero has filed a Corporate Disclosure Statement and Certificate of Interest in the federal lawsuit on behalf of its parent Kiewit Corporation. Rose Law alleges the https://garden.org/plants/ workers installed fire sprinklers on private jobs, including Los Robles Hospital & Medical Center in Thousand Oaks, California and San Jose Regional Medical Center in San Jose, California, and on public works projects including California Department of Veterans Affairs (CalVet) Home in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzdF7T-Gf6A Fresno, CA and California Polytechnic University (CalPoly) Center for Science in San Luis Obispo, California. Any current or former employee of Aero may contact Rose Law for more information.

The lawsuit, brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, the California Labor Code, and California's Unfair Business Practices Act, seeks unspecified damages for the six named workers plus all other fire sprinkler fitters employed by Aero during the last four years. About Rose Law -- Working Hard for Working People(TM) The workers are represented by trial lawyers Joe Rose and Lisa Bradner of Rose Law, APC in Gold River, California. Rose and Bradner help employees and unions in labor law matters involving unpaid wages and overtime, illegal discrimination, retaliation and catastrophic injury. Joe Rose, a former firefighter, was named a Northern California Super Lawyers Rising Star again in 2014 and teaches employment law at Lincoln Law https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzdF7T-Gf6A School of Sacramento. http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20140721006377/en/Rose-Law-Files-Federal-Lawsuit-Aero-Automatic

[harriskaufma]

Employment attorney in Thousand Oaks

Welcome to The Kaufman Law Firm Employment Lawyers Westlake Village, California. We are a leading Westlake Village employment attorneys firm. Discrimination in the workplace is completely unacceptable. Yet, countless employees are either wrongfully terminated or forced to accept demotions due to unethical and unlawful business practices. My name is Matthew A. Kaufman and I am a Westlake Village employment law attorney. The loss of a job can be financially devastating. It can affect a person’s ability to pay their bills, rent, mortgage and live a good quality of life. Unfortunately, far too many people struggle in silence and never take action. Our practice areas are Employment Law, Elder Abuse, Wrongful Discharge, Nursing Home Abuse, Discrimination, Employment Class Actions, Employment Attorney, FMLA And CFRA Claims, Retaliation, Sexual Harassment, Wage And Hour Issues, Whistleblower, and Wrongful Termination.