#dave brailsford

[unitedbydevils]

Tot ziens, Erik

Sigh. Another manager bites the dust. Manchester United and Erik Ten Hag have parted ways, following United's 2-1 defeat away to West Ham United in the Premier League.

There's not much to say. The team wasn't performing, the league position is pants, no win in Europe for a year now... it's hard to defend the man.

I will say that I liked Erik, and I really wanted him - like Ole - to succeed. I think the Premier League shocked him a little, because it's a proper knife fight, but I also think that in a team of egos... tactical stubbornness isn't viable.

That's not to say he should concede to player demands, but there's a little leeway in things. The same goes for training intensity - you don't get as many injuries as the team has without overdoing it behind the scenes.

Despite this being our Banter Era and yet another failed managerial appointment, Erik did win both the Carabao Cup and the FA Cup in successive seasons. Credit where credit's due in delivering some good memories amidst the chaos.

Ruud Van Nistelrooy will take over in the interim for the Leicester City game in the Carabao Cup and potentially longer, while United decide on the next manager.

[rashfordxbruno]

Sir Jim and the INEOS delegation are in the house!

[luxe-pauvre]

Clearly, those with responsibility for making policy in any large organisation should thoroughly examine evidence of this sort. Personally, though, I hesitate to use the phrase 'evidence-based policy’, preferring instead to talk about ‘evidence-informed policy’. This leads to accusations of hair-splitting on my part, but the case is substantive. First, evidence-based policy implies that, if you look hard enough, the evidence will tell you what to do. It rarely, if ever, does. Partly this because, especially in the social sciences, the evidence is often contested and never complete. Also, while the evidence offers valuable insights, it does not indicate the values upon which decisions need to be based. For example, if you could show, on the basis of evidence, that a given tax cut would harm the poor, you would still have a decision to make: should you protect the poor, or is that imperative overridden in this case by macroeconomic considerations? If so, are you willing to pay the price in the short term? I'm not arguing one way or the other, just pointing out that there is a value judgement to be made. The evidence can and should inform the decision, but even when it is compelling, it won't tell you what to do. Dave Brailsford, when referring to tactical and strategic decisions about bike races, makes the point succinctly: The data informs, it doesn't decide.' Hence my preference for the phrase 'evidence-informed’. And the evidence can and should inform, whether it's a purely personal goal or a major strategic intervention at company or government level.

Michael Barber, Accomplishment: How to Achieve Ambitious and Challenging Things

[yashansiwrites]

Atomic Habits

Started reading this book ; recommended by a YouTube channel. Loved the book, things are clear with a crisp explanation. It starts with the narrator's real life story , about his injury and his recovery , how he felt depressed and overwhelmed for months and how everything came about to end with his dwelling self doubt within, how he was thrown from his baseball team and being a player since age four, how humiliated it felt. All that helped him were his beliefs and his thoughts, he knew if things were going to improve, he was the one responsible for making it happen. He could have led his injury and shattered his life professionally and personally but he focused on building a positive outlook and building himself from scratch once again. He focused on getting his life in order while his peers stayed up late and played games , he built good sleep habits and went to bed early each night , In a world full of distractions and party culture, he made a point to build himself and kept him tidy and neat while hostellers are just messy in general. These improvements were minor but it led to a drastic change in future and it gave him a sense of control over his life . Changes were small and gradual but results were remarkable, and with better habits , anything is possible. He started small and made everything big , be it his website or his baseball career or his academics. Small changes in his habits and consistency made a big difference.

Then he started with a story of British cyclists where Dave Brailsford gave it a completely new trajectory; turned everything associated with cycling 1% better. We often convince ourselves that massive success requires massive action, and put pressure on ourselves to make some earth-shattering improvement that everyone will talk about. Getting 1% better each day will end up 37 times better by the end of the year. What starts as a small win or minor setback accumulates into much more. A little difference on any given day, delivered over months and years, can yield tremendous results. You should be far more concerned with your current trajectory than your current results as it is a system that builds you. Time will multiply whatever you feed it, bad habits can cut you down as easily as good habits can build you up.  People make a few small changes, fail to see a tangible result, and decide to stop; it is often because they have not yet crossed the plateau of latent potential. Your work is not wasted, it is just being stored. All the action happens when it crosses the plateau of latent potential. Then the narrator also said, when nothing seemed to help, he got and looked at a stonecutter hammering away at his rock, perhaps a hundred times without as much as a crack showing in it. Yet at the hundred and first blow, it will split into two and that is not the last blow that did it but all that had gone before. The seed of every habit is a single, tiny decision but as the decision is repeated, the habit sprouts and grows stronger. A system of continuous small improvements will yield a different outcome.  Don't associate your happiness with the results, just trust the process and you will start loving the process.

[ajkdlhkj5613]

Now, Rashford has

The media explained, "The leaders of Manchester United,다파벳우회주소 including co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe, sports director Dave Brailsford, CEO Omar Verada, and technical director Jason Wilcox, have reportedly left the decision of Amorim's starting lineup and refuse to touch the situation."

"In theory, it is meaningless to해외배팅사이트가입 have a player on the bench who receives 315,000 pounds (about 570 million won) a week.

Especially if Manchester United wants to send Rashford out at the highest price in the January transfer market. recorded메이저사이트 a market value of 100 million pounds (about 182 billion won) for a season when he scored 30 goals, but it seems to have halved now," he said.

[jayessentialsblog]

Ten Hag's status has not been explicitly stated by Man United

Erik ten Hag's future remains unclear following Manchester United's executive meeting, which was attended by Sir Jim Ratcliffe, Sir Dave Brailsford, Omar Berrada, Dan Ashworth, Jean-Claude Blanc, and Jason Wilcox. Ratcliffe says he does not have the ultimate say in Ten Hag's situation, thus the decision of his future is still up in the air. With the club's backing, Ten Hag's contract was extended to June 2026. Read the full article

[ulkaralakbarova]

When Queen Elizabeth’s reign is threatened by ruthless familial betrayal and Spain’s invading army, she and her shrewd adviser must act to safeguard the lives of her people. Credits: TheMovieDb. Film Cast: Elizabeth I, Queen of England: Cate Blanchett Sir Walter Raleigh: Clive Owen Sir Francis Walsingham: Geoffrey Rush Sir Christopher Hatton: Laurence Fox Amyas Paulet: Tom Hollander Elizabeth Throckmorton: Abbie Cornish Robert Reston: Rhys Ifans King Philip II of Spain: Jordi Mollà Mary, Queen of Scots: Samantha Morton Anthony Babington: Eddie Redmayne Calley: Adrian Scarborough William Walsingham: Adam Godley Archduke Charles: Christian Brassington Count Georg von Helfenstein: Robert Cambrinus Dr. John Dee: David Threlfall Spanish Minister: Vidal Sancho Ursula Walsingham: Kelly Hunter Lord Howard: John Shrapnel Torturer: Sam Spruell Cellarman: David Sterne Admiral Sir William Winter: David Robb Courtier: Jonathan Bailey Walsingham’s Servant: Steve Lately Woman with Baby: Kate Fleetwood Infanta Isabel of Spain: Aimee King Annette: Susan Lynch Mary Walsingham: Kristin Coulter Smith Queen Elizabeth’s Waiting Lady #1: Hayley Burroughs Queen Elizabeth’s Waiting Lady #2: Kirsty McKay Queen Elizabeth’s Waiting Lady #3: Lucia Ruck Keene Queen Elizabeth’s Waiting Lady #4: Lucienne Venisse-Back Laundry Woman: Elise McCave Margaret: Penelope McGhie First Court Lady: Coral Beed Second Court Lady: Rosalind Halstead Manteo: Steven Loton Wanchese: Martin Baron Walsingham’s Agent: David Armand Sir Francis Throckmorton: Steven Robertson Ramsey: Jeremy Barker Burton: George Innes Mary Walsingham: Kirstin Smith Old Throckmorton: Tim Preece Dance Master: Benjamin May Royal Servant: Glenn Doherty Dean of Peterborough: Chris Brailsford Executioner: Dave Legeno Spanish Archbishop: Antony Carrick Marriage Priest: John Atterbury First Spanish Officer: Alex Giannini Second Spanish Officer: Joe Ferrara Courtier: Alexander Barnes Courtier: Charles Bruce Courtier: Jeremy Cracknell Courtier: Benedict Green Courtier: Adam Smith Courtier: Simon Stratton Courtier: Crispin Swayne Mary Stuart’s Lady in Waiting: Kitty Fox Mary Stuart’s Lady in Waiting: Kate Lindesay Mary Stuart’s Lady in Waiting: Katherine Templar Courtier (uncredited): Morne Botes Young Boy (uncredited): Finn Morrell Tyger Salior (uncredited): Shane Nolan Film Crew: Screenplay: William Nicholson Director of Photography: Remi Adefarasin Editor: Jill Bilcock Original Music Composer: A.R. Rahman Original Music Composer: Craig Armstrong Set Decoration: Richard Roberts Stunts: Peter Pedrero Stunt Coordinator: Greg Powell Casting: Fiona Weir Stunts: Rob Inch Stunts: Andy Smart Additional Camera: David Worley Costume Design: Alexandra Byrne Supervising Sound Editor: Mark Auguste Production Design: Guy Hendrix Dyas Supervising Art Director: Frank Walsh Director: Shekhar Kapur Screenplay: Michael Hirst Editor: Andrew Haddock Art Direction: David Allday Set Costumer: Martin Chitty Sound Re-Recording Mixer: Steve Single Scenic Artist: Rohan Harris Stunts: Ray Nicholas Art Direction: Andy Thomson Art Direction: Jason Knox-Johnston Production Manager: Mark Mostyn Stunts: George Cottle Stunts: David Anders Stunts: Peter Miles Visual Effects Supervisor: John Lockwood Stunts: John Kearney Stunts: Paul Kennington Stunts: Nick Chopping Costume Supervisor: Suzi Turnbull Hairstylist: Morag Ross Art Direction: Phil Sims Music Editor: Tony Lewis ADR Recordist: Robert Edwards Stunt Double: Abbi Collins Script Supervisor: Angela Wharton ADR Editor: Tim Hands Art Direction: Christian Huband Visual Effects Supervisor: Richard Stammers Stunts: Rowley Irlam Assistant Art Director: Helen Xenopoulos Foley Artist: Mario Vaccaro Visual Effects Supervisor: Steve Street Property Master: David Balfour Greensman: Ian Whiteford Foley Editor: Andrew Neil Stunts: Gordon Seed Sound Re-Recording Mixer: Tim Cavagin Dialogue Editor: Sam Auguste Scenic Artist: James Gemmill Unit Publicist: Stacy Mann Camera Operator: Ben Wilson Visual Effects Editor: Aled Robinson Stunts: Paul Herbert Hairstylist: Do...

[ghanashowbizonline]

Sports Today - INEOS chief responds to calls for Man Utd to sign Kylian Mbappe

Ghana Sports Today; bringing you all trending sports news as it happens. Get daily comprehensive summary of the recent sports – football news that have rocked the online scene. Check out the news below. INEOS director of sport Sir Dave Brailsford responds to a question on signing Kylian Mbappe for Man Utd. Credit to all our reliable corresponding sources – all rights reserved. 🚨 Editor’s Pick –…

[sridharm-1980]

📸 Sir Jim Ratcliffe and Sir Dave Brailsford with Erik ten Hag! #MUFC

[sportbericht]

Das Blatt wenden: Manchester Uniteds Comeback-Triumph über Aston Villa

Rasmus Højlund durchbrach in einem entscheidenden Moment eine 14-Spiele-Tordürre in der Premier League und sicherte Erik ten Hags Manchester United einen spannenden 3:2-Sieg über Unai Emerys formstarkes Aston Villa. Højlunds Volleyschuss mit dem linken Fuß traf in der 82. Minute das Netz, prallte vom rechten Pfosten von Emiliano Martínez ab und markierte das erste Premier-League-Tor des jungen Stürmers seit seinem Wechsel von Atalanta im Sommer. Trotz der frühen Kontrolle von Aston Villa durch Tore von John McGinn und Leander Dendoncker in der ersten Halbzeit sah sich United einer herausfordernden Situation gegenüber, da man in Rückstand war und zur Halbzeit Buhrufe von den Fans erhielt. Es folgte jedoch eine spektakuläre Wende, angeführt vom Doppelpack des 19-jährigen Alejandro Garnacho und dem entscheidenden Tor von Højlund, was United den ersten Sieg seit fünf Spielen bescherte. Die Freude über Højlunds Tor hallte auf der Tribüne wider, wo die Fans stolz ihre Manchester United trikot trugen, um das aufregende Comeback der Mannschaft zu feiern. Der Zeitpunkt für Højlunds Durchbruch war bedeutsam, da er mit der kürzlichen Übernahme eines 25-prozentigen Anteils an United durch Sir Jim Ratcliffe zusammenfiel und seinem Unternehmen INEOS die Kontrolle über den Fußballbetrieb verschaffte. Sir Dave Brailsford, der Sport-Guru von INEOS, war bei dem Spiel dabei und erlebte die Widerstandsfähigkeit der Spieler und ihr Engagement für Ten Hag, was eine potenzielle Garantie für die Arbeitsplatzsicherheit des Managers darstellen könnte. Während Sir Jim Ratcliffes INEOS die Kontrolle über den Fußballbetrieb übernimmt, schwingt die Bedeutung von Højlunds Tor über das Spielfeld hinaus mit und beeinflusst die Narrative auf und neben den günstige fußballtrikots. Als Sportdirektor von INEOS und neues Vorstandsmitglied wird Brailsford eine Rolle bei der laufenden Veränderung der Geschicke von United spielen. Der bahnbrechende Sieg brachte Manchester United auf den sechsten Platz in der Premier-League-Tabelle, während Aston Villa trotz des Rückschlags seinen dritten Platz behauptet und damit die Chance verpasst, mit Tabellenführer Liverpool gleichzuziehen. Der ausgelassene Jubel beim Schlusspfiff verdeutlichte die Bedeutung dieses Comebacks und die neue Hoffnung in Ten Hags Amtszeit als Manager.

[hardynwa]

Man United come from 2 goals down to beat Aston Villa

Rasmus Hojlund scored his first Premier League goal as Manchester United fought back from two goals down to record a sensational victory in a thrilling Boxing Day encounter with Aston Villa at Old Trafford. In United's first game since Sir Jim Ratcliffe's 25% purchase of the club, and with future director and current Ineos head of sport Sir Dave Brailsford in the directors' box, Erik ten Hag's side produced one of those 'back-from-the-dead' endings for which they are so famed. After John McGinn and Leander Dendoncker had given Villa a deserved half-time advantage, United rallied after the interval and refused to let their heads drop even after Alejandro Garnacho had a goal disallowed by VAR for a marginal offside decision. It was the 19-year-old Argentine who led the fightback, scoring twice in a game for the first time in his career to turn the game on its head. Villa did their best to stem the wave of home attacks. But, just as Midlands rivals Nottingham Forest discovered here in August, United retain some of the old doggedness from the Sir Alex Ferguson days. And, for the home fans at least, there could be no more fitting scorer than Hojlund, who reacted quickest and rammed the ball home after Bruno Fernandes' corner had struck McGinn and bounced free inside a packed penalty area. The relief for Hojlund and his team-mates was clear to see, with goalkeeper Andre Onana racing the full length of the pitch to join in the celebrations as Ten Hag bounced in delight, his fists clenched in evident celebration. Read the full article

[elmaestrostan]

Hahaha Dave Brailsford sat there hoping for some brown Jiffy bags to turn up

[luxe-pauvre]

Of all the sports, cycling seems to involve more suffering than most, so it illustrates this point well. Dave Brailsford masterminded the rebirth of British Cycling. He talks about the suffering this way: you ask the cyclists whether they want to win the Tour de France or even just ride for the team in the event and yes, of course, they do. Then you tell them what it'll mean in terms of diet, time away from home and a training regime which will involve cycling up the equivalent of Everest every week for twelve weeks. So the real question is not so much 'Do you sign up for the Tour? it's Do you sign up for the suffering?' If you're not willing to suffer, don't sign up.

Michael Barber, Accomplishment: How to Achieve Ambitious and Challenging Things

[olko71]

New Post has been published on All about business online

New Post has been published on https://yaroreviews.info/2023/12/manchester-united-sir-jim-ratcliffe-agrees-deal-to-buy-25-stake

Manchester United: Sir Jim Ratcliffe agrees deal to buy 25% stake

Last updated on 5 hours ago5 hours ago.From the section Man Utd

British billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe has agreed to buy a 25% stake in Manchester United for about $1.3bn (£1.03bn).

Ratcliffe’s Ineos Group will take control of football operations.

The 71-year-old will also provide $300m (£236m) for future investment into the club’s Old Trafford stadium.

The announcement comes 13 months after the club’s owners, the Glazer family, stated they were considering selling to “explore strategic alternatives”.

The American family bought the club for £790m in 2005.

The only other publicly declared bidder, Qatari banker Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad Al Thani, withdrew his offer to buy 100% of the club in October.

United have struggled on the pitch this season and have not won the Premier League since 2013, while there have been regular protests against the Glazer ownership.

Manchester-born Ratcliffe is chairman of petrochemicals company Ineos and says he is a “lifelong supporter of the club”. He tried and failed to buy Chelsea last year..

In a statement, he said: “Whilst the commercial success of the club has ensured there have always been available funds to win trophies at the highest level, this potential has not been fully unlocked in recent times.

“We will bring the global knowledge, expertise and talent from the wider Ineos Sport group to help drive further improvement at the club, while also providing funds intended to enable future investment into Old Trafford.

“We are here for the long term and recognise that a lot of challenges and hard work lie ahead, which we will approach with rigour, professionalism and passion. We are committed to working with everyone at the club – the board, staff, players and fans – to help drive the club forward.

“Our shared ambition is clear: we all want to see Manchester United back where we belong, at the very top of English, European and world football.”

The club say the deal is “subject to customary regulatory approvals” but are “hopeful it will be completed as soon as possible”.

There is initially going to be a six-to-eight week process for the deal to be ratified, which includes being signed off by the Premier League.

How will the deal work?

Ratcliffe has agreed to buy 25% of the club’s class B shares, largely held by the Glazer family, who own 69% of the club, and contain almost all the voting rights, and up to 25% of its class A shares, which are listed on the New York Stock Market. The shares are worth $33 per share.

It means the Glazer family will retain a majority stake in the club.

Taking on sporting control at the club means Ineos will oversee the men’s and women’s football operations and academies.

They will also get two seats on the Manchester United PLC and Manchester United Football Club boards.

Subject to necessary approvals, Ratcliffe will delegate his seats on the PLC board to John Reece, a shareholder of Ineos, and Rob Nevin, chairman of Ineos Sport.

On the UK club board he will delegate his seats to former British Cycling chief Sir Dave Brailsford and former Juventus and Paris St-Germain executive Jean-Claude Blanc.

United’s executive co-chairmen and directors, Avram Glazer and Joel Glazer, said: “Sir Jim and Ineos bring a wealth of commercial experience as well as significant financial commitment into the club.

“Through Ineos Sport, Manchester United will have access to seasoned high-performance professionals, experienced in creating and leading elite teams from both inside and outside the game.

“Manchester United has talented people right across the club and our desire is to always improve at every level to help bring our great fans more success in the future.”

Ineos already owns French Ligue 1 club Nice, who are currently second in the table and well placed to qualify for next season’s Champions League, and Swiss club Lausanne.

Its sporting portfolio also includes high-profile sailing team Ineos Britannia – led by Sir Ben Ainslie – which is aiming to win the 2024 America’s Cup for Great Britain.

Ineos also has a five-year partnership with Formula 1 team Mercedes, owning a third of the team – and took over the British-based Team Sky in cycling in 2019.

‘Trawlers Limited’ – the company owned by Ratcliffe which is making the acquisition – was inspired by the famous quote by former United striker Eric Cantona.

10 years of struggles

Fans opposed to the Glazers’ continued involvement at United have held a series of protests inside and outside Old Trafford over the last 12 months of a process which people close to it confidently predicted would be concluded by the end of last season.

The past decade, since legendary manager Sir Alex Ferguson retired in 2013, has seen inconsistency on the pitch despite a high transfer spend, and several big name managers hired and sacked.

United are again inconsistent this season under Dutch manager Erik Ten Hag, having lost 13 of their 26 games in all competitions, sitting eighth in the Premier League and having finished bottom of their Champions League group and been knocked out of the EFL Cup.

Manchester United Supporters’ Trust (Must) said “fans have very mixed feelings today” and that the Glazers’ ongoing role was “a cause for serious concern”.

The trust added that it wished Ratcliffe’s stake was more than 25% and that it is a “puzzle how any organisation can put its very core business in the hands of a minority shareholder, and how that meaningfully works in practice”.

“It is now incumbent on the club’s owners and management to properly explain how this new structure will work, where the new investment will be directed and how it will benefit the team on the field.

“Today might – just might – be a step forward for Manchester United after some very difficult years. But with the Glazers still in charge, people should understand that United fans will remain sceptical and wait for the proof in the pudding.”

Analysis

BBC Sport has been told by people inside and close to the club that a fresh pair of eyes was needed to assess its running.

The launch of the search for strategic alternatives effectively blocked former chief executive Richard Arnold from presiding over change. Now he has gone, Brailsford and Blanc will be doing the assessment. It will be intriguing to see what role interim chief executive Patrick Stewart will play.

On current evidence, they have a lot to go at.

While manager Erik ten Hag is convinced his team are on the right path, results indicate a truth behind something else BBC Sport has been told, that United like to congratulate themselves on doing easy transfer deals and shy away from difficult ones.

In other words, last summer, they signed players like Casemiro – who Real Madrid were happy to let go – for £70m, having failed to get Ten Hag’s first choice, Frenkie De Jong. This summer they went for Rasmus Hojlund from Atalanta rather than Harry Kane, who United concluded was too expensive and too difficult to sign. Kane is the leading scorer in Europe’s big-five leagues, Hojlund is yet to get a Premier League goal.

Declan Rice has been outstanding for Arsenal this season, a potential game-changer in the title race. United signed Mason Mount, who was out of form before he got injured, and Sofyan Amrabat on loan from Fiorentina, who has not been able to secure a regular place in an unsuccessful team.

It is that kind of perceived wastefulness in the transfer market that has to be addressed.

Manchester United have fallen a significant distance, on and off the pitch, since Sir Alex Ferguson was in his pomp. Their fans can only hope, after false dawns under Louis van Gaal, Jose Mourinho, Ole Gunnar Solskjaer and, now, Ten Hag, this really is the start of the long climb back.

Timeline: How did Manchester United get here?

In January, Ratcliffe’s firm Ineos officially stated an interest and said the company had “formally put ourselves into the process”.

Ineos and Sheikh Jassim submitted their first bids for United in February, with the Qatari consortium saying their offer “plans to return the club to its former glories”.

By March, both parties had entered second, revised bids after a deadline was extended at their request, amid confusion.

Elliott Investment Management and leading private equity group Carlyle, both based in the US, also entered the race but were only willing to purchase a minority stake.

The potential sale reached a third round of bidding in April, with Thomas Zilliacus saying he had also submitted a bid to buy the club.

However, the Finnish entrepreneur declined to enter a another offer, saying he would not participate “in a farce” and instead decided to keep his earlier second bid on the table.

Although the Glazer family did not respond following the deadline on 28 April, there had been increasing confidence in the Ineos camp that their efforts to take over at Old Trafford would be successful after it emerged its bid put a higher overall value on the club than Sheikh Jassim, because he was paying more for a smaller stake.

In May, Sheikh Jassim made an improved fourth bid of nearer to £5bn for 100% of United, in an offer that would clear the almost £1bn debt of the club and included a separate fund for the club and local community.

Sheikh Jassim withdrew from the process to buy United in October after further talks broke down.

Ratcliffe had already amended his initial plan to buy the Glazers’ 69% shareholding and reduced it to a ‘majority’ stake.

However, it was only when he reduced it again, to 25%, that the potential for an agreement increased.

CORRECTION: 24 December 2023 – This story originally reported that the 25% stake was purchased for about £1.25bn, when the correct figure was in fact £1.03bn

[ajkdlhkj5613]

182 billion won) for a season

The media explained, "The leaders of Manchester United,다파벳우회주소 including co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe, sports director Dave Brailsford, CEO Omar Verada, and technical director Jason Wilcox, have reportedly left the decision of Amorim's starting lineup and refuse to touch the situation."

"In theory, it is meaningless to해외배팅사이트가입 have a player on the bench who receives 315,000 pounds (about 570 million won) a week.

Especially if Manchester United wants to send Rashford out at the highest price in the January transfer market. Now, Rashford has recorded메이저사이트 a market value of 100 million pounds (about when he scored 30 goals, but it seems to have halved now," he said.

[jayessentialsblog]

Ten Hag's status has not been explicitly stated by Man United

Erik ten Hag’s future remains unclear following Manchester United’s executive meeting, which was attended by Sir Jim Ratcliffe, Sir Dave Brailsford, Omar Berrada, Dan Ashworth, Jean-Claude Blanc, and Jason Wilcox. Ratcliffe says he does not have the ultimate say in Ten Hag’s situation, thus the decision of his future is still up in the air. With the club’s backing, Ten Hag’s contract was…