#charge sheet against Raj Kundra
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
dailynews9 · 2 years ago
Text
Mumbai police files charge sheet against Raj Kundra
Mumbai police files charge sheet against Raj Kundra
Mumbai : The Mumbai cyber crime has filed a charge sheet against businessman and Bolly wood actor Shilpa Shetty’s husband Raj Kundra and others in connection with the case of producing and streaming pornographic content. The Mumbai cyber crime last week has filed over 1000 page charge sheet in the Esplanade court. Responding to the new charge sheet, Prashant Patil, the advocate of Kundra claimed…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
hummingzone · 3 years ago
Text
Shilpa Shetty’s son Viaan shares first Instagram post after Raj Kundra gets bail in porn case | The Times of India
Shilpa Shetty’s son Viaan shares first Instagram post after Raj Kundra gets bail in porn case | The Times of India
Soon after Raj Kundra’s bail was reported, Shilpa Shetty took to her social media handle to share a message of hope. Her now viral post read, “Rainbows exist to prove that beautiful things can happen after a bad storm.” Reportedly, Shilpa’s statement was included in a nearly 1,500-page charge sheet that was filed before a magistrate court against Kundra. According to the charge sheet, the…
View On WordPress
0 notes
indoreknnnews · 3 years ago
Text
'I was too busy to know what he's doing': Shilpa Shetty tells cops on Raj Kundra case
‘I was too busy to know what he’s doing’: Shilpa Shetty tells cops on Raj Kundra case
The Mumbai Police on Wednesday filed a 1500-page charge sheet against businessman and Shilpa Shetty’s husband Raj Kundra in a pornography film case. In her statement to the Property Cell of Mumbai Crime Branch, actress Shilpa Shetty shared details of Kundra’s business and how she was too busy with her own work to enquire about what her husband was up to. Continue reading
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
visionmpbpl-blog · 7 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media
New Post has been published on http://www.visionmp.com/bhiwandi-police-in-april-registered-a-case-against-the-duo-for-duping-textile-firm-owner-of-rs-24-lakh/
HC asks cops not to file charge sheet against Shipa Shetty, Raj Kundra
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Monday asked the police not to file charge sheet against actor Shilpa Shetty and her businessman husband Raj Kundra in an alleged cheating case for two weeks till it hears the matter again.
A division bench of justices RV More and Sarang Kotwal gave the direction to the police while hearing a joint plea by Shetty and Kundra for quashing of a case of cheating and criminal breach of trust against the couple.
“Do not file a charge sheet in the case till we hear this petition,” said the bench while also seeking the police’s stand over the plea by the couple. It adjourned the matter for two weeks.
On April 27, the Bhiwandi police in neighbouring Thane district registered the case against Shilpa and Raj for allegedly duping a textile firm owner of Rs 24 lakh.
Shilpa and Raj were booked for allegedly committing the penal offences of criminal breach of trust and cheating, respectively under sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
The IPC section 406 entails a jail term up to three years while section 420 attracts a maximum punishment of seven years on conviction.
The duo had been granted anticipatory bail by a Thane sessions court in May this year. They had then approached the high court for having the case quashed.
Shetty and Kundra’s lawyer Aniket Nikam said the complainant in the case and a company, Best Deal TV Pvt Ltd, of which the accused (Shilpa and Kundra) were directors, were in a business partnership for over a year.
“Best Deal had made a payment of over Rs one crore to the complainant in the past and hence it cannot be said that the accused persons had any intention to cheat the complainant,” Nikam said.
He further argued that the case was civil in nature.
According to the complaint, Best Deal collected money from customers for sale of bedsheets on behalf of another company Malotia Textiles through TV ads, but allegedly did not pay the proceeds to the latter.
0 notes