#cert 3 child care government funded

[skillaustraliame]

Boost your career with the best Certificate III in Early Childhood Education & Care course in skills Australia.

There is no better course to study at Skills Australia than the Certificate III in Early Childhood Education & Care. During this course, you will learn the skills and knowledge necessary to work effectively as a team member in early childhood services. There will be a variety of subjects covered in the course such as providing care for babies, toddlers and children, children's health and safety at work, helping children develop their behaviour, connections to the world and much more. Visit Skills Australia Institute for more information about this course.

[suzanjohnstonau]

Widely-Recognised Academies are inviting for Child Care Course – Book Your Seat Now!

Many nationally renowned schools are offering nanny training and child care course for interested candidates. However, you should get adequate knowledge of the course as well as the scope before making a decision. Still, according to the experts, this is one of the fastest growing industries in Australian cities and suburbs. One can make her career in various roles within the industry.

The early education course of cert 3 in child care is the most recommended by many knowledgeable persons. One can make her career as an educator or assistant educator, professional nanny, day care worker, and various other positions. Reliable training schools provide physical as well as online classrooms for their trainees. Moreover, they also help eligible students by offering government-funded courses.

Why Should You Join a Nationally Recognised school for Childcare Courses?

Courses at premium training centres are endorsed by the industry’s leading childcare and nanny employment agencies.

Due to the collaboration, students get the benefits when finding a job as a fresher.

The higher placement rate of reputed institutes gives better career-building possibilities to candidates.

Students don't have to be worried about unemployment and they can pay full attention to their studies and training.

Trainees get deep theoretical as well as practical knowledge and become professionals when the course is completed.

When trainees get placement in a renowned organisation from the school they would surely get a respectable pay scale.

Thus, you should find a reputable institute if you’re thinking to make your future in childcare and nanny industry. Get in touch with Australia’s leading and established training academies to get admission in various certification courses.

Source

[newyorkprelawland-blog]

Children Remain In Foster Care As Qualified Same-Sex Parents Are Discriminated Against

By Spencer Brooke Hayes, University at Albany, SUNY Class of 2021

June 25, 2020

In November 2019, President Trump began the legislative processes of placing limitations on the LGBTQ community. Trump’s efforts were aimed at removing the LGBTQ community as a protected class which was established by Obama in the previous term[1]. Obama had passed an Executive Order which amended the Civil Rights Act of 1964[2]. Specifically, this Executive Order amended Richard Nixon’s Executive Order 11478 and Lyndon B. Johnson’s Executive Order 112462. Obama’s Executive Order 13672did the following,

“prohibit discrimination on the basis of ‘sexual orientation’ and ‘gender identity’ by federal contractors, and to prohibit discrimination against federal employees based on ‘gender identity’”2

It is this Executive Order that Trump has desire to change, specifically in adoption agencies. The Department of Health and Human Services aligned with the Trump administration on rescinding Obama’s rule to allow for religious adoption and fostering agencies to deny services to those who are not heterosexual1. Agencies would have the opportunity to use faith-based grounds to refuse working with individuals and/or couples who did not adhere to the general norms of gender1.

In June 2020, President Trump submitted the following, “a brief to the Supreme Court on Wednesday arguing that taxpayer funded organization should be able to refuse to work with same-sex couples and other whom the group considers to be in violation of its religious beliefs”[3]. There are over 400,000 children in the foster care system and with this revision to the law, agencies’ religious beliefs will hinder the number of children who are adopted1. It has been recorded that 21.4% of same-sex couples adopted a child in the United States while only 3% of different-sex couples adopted a child out of the foster system1. In 2016, 114,000 same-sex couples were raising children1. Many opponents to the Trump administration’s efforts argue that by allowing faith based excuses for denying adoption services, the best interest of the children in the system are being ignored1. The religious based systems are limiting their pool of parental candidates, allowing the population of children who are in need of families.

While there are those who believe that this is discrimination against the LGBTQ community, others argue that the government is discriminating against foster agencies’ religious beliefs. In June 2018, the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU, filed a lawsuit on behalf of the Support Center for Child Advocates and Philadelphia Family Pride in reaction to the Catholic Social Services, CSS, and the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty suing the City of Philadelphia[4]. The CSS had been reported to the City of Philadelphia for refusing to license same-sex couples as foster parents and as a result, the city stopped “referring” children to their agencies4. In response, the CSS sued the city and argued, “that its right to free exercise of religion and free speech entitled it to reject qualified same-sex couples because they were same-sex couples, rather than for any reason related to their qualifications to care for children”4. This case’s motion has been denied in the federal district courts, the Third Circuit, and the Supreme Court though on February 24, 2020 the Supreme Court announced the case had been granted cert4. The Trump Administration is utilizing this case as evidence to the government’s discrimination against religious agencies for denying them the right to refuse services to same-sex couples3. In the filed brief, “the government argued that ‘Philadelphia has impermissibly discriminated against religious exercise’ and that the city’s actions ‘reflected unconstitutional hostility toward Catholic Social Services’ religious beliefs’”3. We continue to await the decision of the Supreme Court on this matter.

Last year, “The American Bar Association adopted a resolution last week decrying the ‘state-sanctioned discrimination’ faced by some lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer parents in the United States…The 16 page ABA document outlines legal decisions that should, it argues, guarantee LGBTQ individuals across the US the right to parent, while also describing the patchwork of state laws that has restricted some LGBTQ individuals’ ability to parent, especially through adoption and foster care”[5]. There were a number of cases which went to trial in the Supreme Court that supported the ABA’s resolution document. The first of the two cases being Obergefell versus Hodges, where a same-sex couple were not recognized as married and therefore did not receive the same treatment as different-sex couples[6]. The couple in question, were married in New York State where same-sex marriage is legal and then moved to Tennessee where the state did not recognize their marriage and therefore, stripped them of their marital rights6. The couple went to trial after they were discriminated against over their child’s medical records and school information6. On their child’s records, the couple was only permitted to grant legal rights to one parent while, if they were a different-sex couple, both parents would be granted it6. The lawsuit argued that the couple’s Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated by this action6. This amendment states that courts should act with reasonable judgement in the interest of that individual, therefore, the right of marry is protected by it6. In the end, the Supreme Court concluded the following,

“all parties agree, many same-sex couples provide loving and nurturing homes to their children, whether biological or adopted. And hundreds of thousands of children are presently being raised by such couples…Most states have allowed gays and lesbians to adopt, either as individuals or as couples, and many adopted and foster children have same-sex parents…This provides powerful confirmation from the law itself that gays and lesbians can create loving, supported families”6

The second case used in the ABA legal document is that of Pavan et al versus Smith from 20175. This case stemmed from two same-sex couples in Arkansas being denied the right for both of their names being on their child’s birth certificates5. Both couples had anonymous sperm donors to conceive their children, therefore one of the partners was their biological mother[7]. When the couples filed for the birth certificates, only the birth mother’s name was reported7. According to Arkansas state law, a child’s birth certificate is required to have the mother’s male spouse whether or not they are legally married7. Because the same-sex couple was not granted the right to report the mother’s spouse because it was a woman, goes against the commitment established by the Obergefell case which ensures that same-sex couples are treated the same as different-sex and their marriage license is acknowledged7. Arkansas argued that birth certificates are only for recording biological parental status though this is not true because a mother can grant legal recognition to their husband even if they are not the biological father7. In the Arkansas State Supreme Court, their motion was to deny the charges though this decision was over turned on June 26, 2017 by the United States Supreme Court7. Same-sex couples are now able to record both parents on their children’s birth certificates granting legal rights even if they are not biologically related.

As of February 2020, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and the district court have ruled in favor of promoting “Fulton vs City of Philadelphia” requirement8. The agencies that are tax payer funded cannot discriminate against qualified parents whether or not they are different-sex partners8. In regard to President Trump’s Executive Order, we are still awaiting to hear from the Supreme Court’s decision from trial which is planned to begin in October8.

________________________________________________________________

Spencer Brooke Hayes is a graduate student at the Rockefeller College, University at Albany studying International Affairs. Graduated from the University of Connecticut, Storrs in 2019 with a Bachelors of Arts in Political Science and Philosophy with a concentration in International Relations

________________________________________________________________

[1]Taylor, Derrick Bryson. 2019. “Adoption Groups Could Turn Away LGBT Families Under Proposed Rule”. The New York Times. November 2. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/02/us/trump-hhs-lgbtq-rule.html

[2]Sprigg, Peter and Travis Weber. “Obama Executive Order on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity”. Family Research Council. https://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=IS14I01

[3] Moreau, Julie. 2020. “Adoption agency should be able to reject gay couples, Trump administration argues” NBC News. June 4. https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/adoption-agency-should-be-able-reject-gay-couples-trump-administration-n1224911

[4]ACLU Pennsylvania. 2018. “Fulton V. City of Philadelphia”. ACLU Pennsylvania. https://www.aclupa.org/en/cases/fulton-v-city-philadelphia

[5] Moreau, Julie. 2019. “LGBTQ parents face ‘state-sanctioned discrimination’, American Bar Association says”. NBC News. February 6. https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/lgbtq-parents-face-state-sanctioned-discrimination-american-bar-association-says-n968456

[6]Supreme Court of the United States. 2014. “Obergefell et Al v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health et Al”. Supreme Court of the United States. October Term. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf

[7]Supreme Court of the United States. 2017. “Pavan et al vs Smith”. Supreme Court of the United States. June 26. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/16-992_868c.pdf

Photo Credit: Ingfbruno

[suzanne24936871-blog]

Elevation Need For A Youngster Using In The Front Seat

Trying to find the best suitable homeschool systems for your kid? The metropolitan Exeter Region Cooperative College Area performs utilize neighborhood funds for most from its per-pupil investing of $10,149, but because of a median revenue from virtually $58,000, its attempt amount is 9.40, creating this normal in this state. Large primary universities have the tendency to have all the extra-curricular activities that a social school might possess, and at times a lot more, however smaller private schools could possess a restricted number of options. This indicates that the film rated consists of absolutely nothing very most moms and dads will certainly think about annoying for even their youngest little ones to hear or view. Hi, after the Singapore Citizenship ceremonial in Oct 2012, I was actually waiting coming from MLY High Compensation to update me to pick up K Type as well as returned my authentic childbirth cert. Millions of little ones will certainly have come through their 1,000 times by then. If the rash lasts greater than a few days, carry your child to the doctor to find out the cause. The kids that were actually placed at Cayuga Centers invest their days at the location, which functions like a school, as well as the children receive access to instructional shows, health care procedure and also curative support. In April 2007, the United States Education and learning Team customized its own guidelines governing the testing from compensatory education kids. Colleges could deliver supporting systems giving remedial aid to little ones along with either Dyslexia or even Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). However few - if any type of - of those reforms would affect the privately-funded pupils at the Leaders Institution who participate in at costs up to $44,000 a year, given that they're not under state care or monitoring. A lot of moms and dads usually depletion their kids to obtain grip from other blameless individual assistance or else also adolescent help remittances coming from their on poor lexicon other to some extent. Trainees can easily lose off one to 3 months from finding out throughout the summer season, so program to keep your little one interacted click through the following page motivating reading, phrase games, mathematics as well as attributes activities. The Research Study from Early Day Care and also Young People Growth," or SECCYD, disclosed vital places of little one advancement determined by day care companies and experiences. This post is actually to answer a question coming from a sibling that would like to know how you can instruct 3-4 year-old little ones to read. Furthermore, Virginia institutions teachers are going to have the ability to utilize the exam scores to target concern regions for each of these youngsters.

Yes - very most agencies would certainly still anticipate our company to spend all of them the total charges regardless of whether the housemaid fails the health care exam in Singapore. Personally, I tend to cut other moms and dads much more relaxed when I am actually looking at challenging incantations.Activities such as the Vancouver Private School Expo permit moms and dads to fulfill in person along with educators as well as various other representatives from a selection of colleges. Just what to seek in a great homeschool system Moms and dads must be a good idea in selecting the very best homeschool course for their youngster.

[nhlabornews]

Workers on Janus: A Political Effort to Further Rig the Rules Against Working People

In a rigged economy, workers say the freedom to come together in strong unions is more important than ever

WASHINGTON — The following statement was issued by members and leaders of AFSCME, AFT, NEA, and SEIU – the nation’s four largest public sector unions – in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to grant Certiorari in Janus v. AFSCME Council 31:

The Janus case is a blatantly political and well-funded plot to use the highest court in the land to further rig the economic rules against everyday working people. The billionaire CEOs and corporate interests behind this case, and the politicians who do their bidding, have teamed up to deliver yet another attack on working people by striking at the freedom to come together in strong unions. The forces behind this case know that by joining together in strong unions, working people are able to win the power and voice they need to level the economic and political playing field. However, the people behind this case simply do not believe that working people deserve the same freedoms they have: to negotiate a fair return on their work.

This case started with an overt political attempt by the billionaire governor of Illinois, Bruce Rauner, to attack public service workers through the courts. And, in a letter to supporters detailed in The Guardian, the CEO of the corporate-backed State Policy Network (SPN) reveals the true intent of a nationwide campaign of which Janus is a part: to strike a ‘mortal blow’ and ‘defund and defang’ America’s unions. The merits of the case are clear. Since 1977, Abood has effectively governed labor relations between public sector employees and employers, allowing employers and employees the freedom to determine labor policies that best serve the public. When reviewing the legal merits of this case, it is clear that this attempt to manipulate the court against working people should be rejected.

“This case is yet another example of corporate interests using their power and influence to launch a political attack on working people and rig the rules of the economy in their own favor. When working people are able to join strong unions, they have the strength in numbers they need to fight for the freedoms they deserve, like access to quality health care, retirement security and time off work to care for a loved one. The merits of the case, and 40 years of Supreme Court precedent and sound law, are on our side. We look forward to the Supreme Court honoring its earlier rulings.” – Lee Saunders, President, AFSCME

“My work as a Child Protection Investigator for the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services is vital to the safety of our state’s most vulnerable children and families. This court case is yet another political attack on the freedom of my colleagues and I to speak up to ensure that we can safely and adequately manage our caseloads, which reflects our commitment to safety and public service to our communities.” – Stephen Mittons, AFSCME Council 31 member, Child Protection Investigator for the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services

“Unions are all about fighting for and caring about people—and in the public sector that includes those we represent and those we protect and teach in communities across America. Yet corporations, wealthy interests and politicians have manufactured Janus as part of their long and coordinated war against unions. Their goal is to further weaken workers’ freedom to join together in a union, to further diminish workers’ clout.

“These powerful interests want to gut one of the last remaining checks on their control—a strong and united labor movement that fights for equity and opportunity for all, not just the privileged few. And under the guise of the First Amendment, they want to overturn a 40-year precedent that’s been reaffirmed numerous times. In other words, this would be a radical departure from well-established law. We believe that after resolving a similar case last year, the Supreme Court erred in granting cert in Janus, and that the trumped-up underpinnings of the plaintiff’s argument will rapidly become clear before the full bench.” – Randi Weingarten, President, AFT

“My union just went through a lengthy contract fight in Philadelphia. We had to fight hard to protect our students’ basic needs, such as having at least one nurse and counselor in each school and ensuring that kids had necessary textbooks and materials. And we had to fight back against the district’s desire to eliminate class sizes and get lead testing for the school’s water fountains. Most people assume that the union only fights for teachers’ rights, when in reality, most of our contract is there to protect the basic rights and needs of our students. Those rights are at grave risk in Janus.” – Jeff Price, AFT Local 3 member, Teacher at Central High School, School District of Philadelphia.

“For decades corporate CEO’s and the wealthy have fought to enrich themselves at the expense of the rights and pocket books of working people, and that harms families in communities across the country. As the nation’s largest union, we know this fight will not only impact the lives of educators, but it also impacts the families of the children we educate. We won’t back down from this fight and we will always stand up to support working people, our students and the communities we serve.” – Lily Eskelsen García, President, NEA

“More and more, the economy is working against working people, including the families whose children I teach. My union gives me a voice and a seat at the table to advocate for my students, my colleagues, and my community.” – Sonya Shpilyuk, NEA member, High School English teacher, Montgomery County, MD

The anti-worker extremists behind this case want to divide working people, make it harder to pool our resources, and limit our collective power. But SEIU members won’t let any court case stand in our way of sticking together for good jobs and strong communities.” – Mary Kay Henry, President, SEIU

“By sticking together in our union, we’ve lifted the wage floor to a $15 minimum wage, protected and expanded health care benefits for our families, and won more funding for our schools. Together, we’ll continue to fight to ensure all students have the support and services they need to succeed in school. That’s why the extremists are attacking us, to stop our progress. But we plan to stick together no matter what and keep standing up for quality public services.” – Edna Logan, SEIU Local 99 member, Custodian at Esteban Torres School, Los Angeles Unified School District.

Workers on Janus: A Political Effort to Further Rig the Rules Against Working People was originally published on NH LABOR NEWS

[skillaustraliame]

All students can enroll in the certificate 3 in childcare course offered by Skill Australia Institute (RTO Number 52010 | CRICOS Code 03548F). This course will teach you how to care for babies, toddlers, and children. Furthermore, you will ensure the health and safety of the children and the workplace. Additionally, you will learn how to provide support for children's behavior and connect with them in their early stages of learning. 

Upon completion of this course, you will gain relevant skills and knowledge about child care. Therefore, register yourself at Skills Australia Institute, the best college in Australia, without a second thought.