#but like earthspark tfa tfp beast wars etc etc…. are for kids | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

thewadapan · 2 months ago

Text

From @arceespinkgun in the replies:

[...] I think the majority of Earthspark's episodes are very tightly written and the show is great, lacks the stupidity all other Transformers media features [...]

Someone in the group chat observed last night that Transformers: EarthSpark also has a "evil green version of kid-appeal main character impersonates them" stock plot, which also sucked, and that was over 15 years later. I kind of want to think that narrative tech evolves and improves over time, even in the slop mines, but EarthSpark has very much disabused me of that notion. Its peaks are definitely much higher than the peaks of Animated, though.

so IDK if we'll have the same opinion on this, but I'm curious about what you thought of how Sari's character changed so drastically post-upgrade. I know that the reason it happened was so she'd appeal more to the kids who wanted an aspirational teen character... but I felt as if her personality and role were severely diminished, and I wonder what the cause of this was when other shows this one clearly takes inspiration from didn't feature these problems.

I completely forgot to talk about this, but yes, Sari's character swerve is insane! For those who don't know: Sari spends Seasons 1 and 2 as a bratty kid with a big personality, then shows like Star Wars: The Clone Wars and Ben 10: Alien Force hit it bigtime, which prompts a big tonal shift in Season 3; minor recurring character Blurr gets killed off in a gnarly way. Sari uses her magic key to "upgrade" herself, effectively turning herself into an adolescent, and in the process seemingly obliterating her personality.

If you ask me to psychoanalyze this from a Doylist perspective—well, this happens a lot with fathers, doesn't it? "Bratty daughter" is an archetype they are equipped to understand. "Angsty teenager" is not. I think they knew what they were getting away from, the sort of kid-appeal stock plots involving Sari from earlier seasons, but didn't have a clear idea of where they were going with her character. Animated is a show that relies heavily on cartoonish archetypes, and they moved Sari towards an archetype that was less well-defined than most of the others.

I'm also curious about what your thoughts on that finale were. Transformers shows like Beast Wars, TFA, TFP, etc. have this tendency to completely crumble as they get closer to their ends, because it becomes transparent that the creative teams had zero (good) plan. In TFA, I think that final season and finale felt especially rushed.

Yes, this is a fair characterisation. If we imagine the writers knowing at the end of Season 2 that Season 3 would be the last one, then the resulting episodes look quite different, don't they? Instead, there's a sense that they're keeping stuff in their back pocket, to have something to justify the existence of a Season 4. The resulting finale reminds me of Homestuck Act 7, where everything in the presentation is screaming "this is the ending! We've come full circle! Everything is resolved now!" But in actuality very few of the long-term plot threads have reached a meaningful resolution, and in fact, it's hard to imagine what the plan for those plot threads ever really was, once you get sufficiently removed from the story's start. I can extend this comparison between The Homestuck Epilogues and "Trial & Error"; both of these are heavily post-facto post-canon works ghostwritten by teams of "ascended fans" working off insider knowledge from the original author, which aim to provide closure following a transition to print media.

What I'm saying is that it doesn't feel to me like the Animated creative team ever seriously sat down to nail down the specifics of the show's ultimate direction. They obviously knew that it would end with Optimus Prime proving himself a hero by capturing Megatron, they obviously had worked out some vague theories for Sari's origin, but otherwise it just wasn't a question they had to grapple with, and unfortunately it really shows. Stuff just happens. The Wasp/Shockwave stuff is an interesting setup that's clearly going nowhere in particular. I recommend reading this essay by LOST writer Javier Grillo-Marxuach, which approaches this topic from an insider perspective.

And fans for some reason put an incredibly shocking amount of stake in what these people say for reasons I cannot fathom.

Ghoulish, isn't it? Unfortunately I think those fans who really liked Animated are vulnerable to the fact that the show itself was never going to provide that complete sense of closure, satisfaction, completeness. It was always going to end the same way. So there's a sentiment that Season 4 is just sitting in a drawer somewhere, complete, perfect. And when Marty Isenberg stresses that this isn't so, that they never worked out much of anything past the "Trial of Megatron" premiere treatment, the question becomes- "OK OK but what would you have done?" And there's no real answer to that. The only way to escape this paradigm is, unfortunately, to not be that compelled by it in the first place.

thoughts on Transformers Animated

I would've been the perfect age to get absolutely oneshotted by Animated when it started airing on Cartoon Network, but my parents didn't pay for satellite TV, so after Transformers: Cybertron finished airing on CITV I was pretty much shit out of luck for Transformers cartoons for a while. I remember watching clips from the show on Monkey Bar TV, a section on Hasbro's website. The art style didn't really appeal to me. I do wonder about that alternate reality where I did get to see Animated as a nine year old. Would that have fucked me up?

This isn't a proper essay, I'm not here to tell you Transformers Animated Sucks And Here's Why, it's just some off-the-cuff thoughts I had, having now sat down to watch the cartoon in full for the second time in my life. I am going to have to break out the roman numerals, but only because I cannot shut up. So that's the epistemological status on this one.

I. Be a Hero

The thing with Transformers Animated is that it's a great Animated cartoon and kind of a terrible Transformers cartoon. My friend Jo recently put out an essay taxonimising the two different approaches to writing Transformers stories into Budianskian ("human-meets-robot") and Furmanist ("robots-fighting"), pointing to Animated as an example where the first season is grounded in human affairs and culture clash, only for the show to become progressively more preoccupied with conflicts between Autobots and Decepticons until, by the third season, Earth is basically just a backdrop used to create the illusion of stakes, a damsel-in-distress just offscreen. Well, having now revisited it, I honestly think it was Furmanist from the start?

I think the best way to approach Animated through a critical lens is to think of what it means to be an American boy/tween. What do you find cool? What do you want to be when you grow up? My equivalent to Animated was probably Ben 10, which I thought was the coolest shit; it was probably the best of the overtly-boy-aimed cartoons available to us Freeview plebs at the time. Ben 10 is a very empowering fantasy because Ben 10 can have pretty much any abiliity he wants at a particular moment. As a kid growing up you kind of do wish you could turn your flesh to solid crystal, or buzz around as a mutant bug, or just bowl over your enemies like a human bowling ball. These are normal emotions.

That's how Transformers Animated is written. A big part of Sari's character, as the obligatory audience-surrogate-human-child, is that she has an insane amount of freedom for a kid. She has a palatial penthouse, she's homeschooled, except she mostly ignores her Tutor-Bot, so in practise she can do whatever she wants. She gets given a magic key that lets her make any machine do whatever she wants it to, hilarity ensues, etc, etc. Some of my favourite parts of the show are when it teases out some of the pathos of Sari's character; her disconnection from other kids her age, the way the Autobots sometimes treat her more as a pet than a peer, her distant father with his Tom Kenny racist accent, the overly-mechanised and consumerist world she's adapted to thrive in.

The idea of Transformers Animated as a Budianskian story rings false to me because future-Detroit is about as alien from society as Cybertron itself; which is to say, not super alien, but still pretty unmistakably unreal. It's not trying to feel real. In fact, it's clear that the setting was chosen precisely for the sake of injecting Transformers sensibilities into the "human world" of the story, so that the show can be, on balance, more Transformers. This deliberate homogenisation strikes me as intrinsically Furmanist, which shies away from two-worlds-collide storytelling. Animated definitely has its moments of culture-clash, but they're not The Point, they're set-dressing.

Fundamentally, we're invited into the world of Transformers Animated through the eyes of the (all-male) Autobot cast. Between them they account for most of the episodic "learns an important lesson" character arcs, and as the show goes on, more and more of the screentime is devoted to their affairs. It's similar to how BIONICLE has two audience surrogates: the Matoran, who are weak and stupid like human children, and the Toa, who are cool and aspirational like teenagers or adults; the foundational text Mask of Light is preoccupied with the onscreen transmutation of the former into the latter, as if to say, this isn't just who you want to be, it's who you can be. The Autobots in Transformers Animated reflect the five key aspirational archetypes for young lads, as identified through extensive focus-group testing, these being: combination cop/firefighter, ninja, street racer, Engineer from Team Fortress 2, and angry old man.

Everything in the pitch slate for Transformers Animated is geared towards this being a superhero show that Hasbro doesn't need to pay license fees to Marvel for. It was literally called Transformers Hero at the start of its development. So like, taken as a superhero story in a toyetic kid sense (that is to say, there are no "secret identities", Superman is Superman full-time because kids find Superman sitting in an office boring), it's fine for what it is! This isn't like my Transformers One review where I'm going to try to convince you that the creative team weren't fucking trying, no, they were definitely trying for the most part, and they did a good job. It's purely a matter of taste.

Anyway! So!

Probably what had me be like, "man, fuck this"—and I've never heard anyone else mention this—was actually the Constructicons.

I know, right? Weird! If you're a veteran of the Transformers Animated discourse mines, you probably think of stuff like all the sexism, or the Tom Kenny Funny Accents, or maybe even something more abstract like the undercooked politics of the war. I dunno, maybe I'll talk about some of that stuff while I'm here. For me, though, there was more or less this hat trick of episodes at the start of Season 3, nearly three in a row, where for entirely different reasons I was like "man, fuck off".

II. Beneath the enemy scrotum

When the Constructicons are first introduced in Season 2, there's a genuinely tragic bent to their story. They're born into this alien world as fully-formed New Yoik Construction workers, they form this friendship with Bulkhead, the other Autobots are disproportionally suspicious of them, they get seduced by Megatron, they wind up getting their memories wiped. It's giving "Transmutate". And the arc that this introduction sets up for the Constructicons is like, hey, maybe when it counts, they'll remember who their friend really is, and they'll come back around to the side of angels. The thing with the Constructicons, right, is that they're stupid, and they're lazy, and they're selfish, and they think they're owed something when they're not. They operate on pure id, catcalling at cars, tossing back barrel after barrel of engine oil, and never really doing any actual work. And there's definitely an inherent humour to this image of an alcoholic digger sexually harassing random sportscars. So long as the show seems ultimately sympathetic towards the Constructicons, as if they might have a heart of gold under it all that separates them from the Decepticons, maybe it feels okay to laugh at them, because they're good people who just haven't worked it out yet. It's just a farce, a comedy of errors.

But every time the Constructicons come back, the show just... does an encore. They do more and more overtly evil things, and the show leans more and more on how crude these guys are. In "Sari, No-One's Home", they're cast in the roles of the robbers from Home Alone; if Transformers Animated can be said to have sinned, then it's an old sin, one drawn from a rich tradition of scorn for the working class, the ne'er-do-well, the wrong'un, the layabout. The Constructicons clearly have some valuable skill, when they can be motivated to work; the problem is that they're stupid and directionless. They're often banging on about their workers' rights, and making excuses not to work. While I don't think it's intentional on the part of the writers, the contrivance whereby they are "animated" (lmao) by shards of the AllSpark from regular human machinery does sort of separate them from the rest of the Transformers on an ontological, biological level. Wreck-Gar is similar, portrayed as basically just crazy, not quite a "full person".

Through a lens of writing as observation, the Constructicons are great; they're a distillation, a caricature, a cartoon of lots of specific things you've ever heard a workman say. But through a lens of writing as empathy, they're just kind of cringe, sorry. The show does not afford them the same internality as the Autobots, or even most of the other villains. It's hard to read them as anything other than a mean-spirited stereotype of labourers. On a narrative level, the purpose they serve is related to the Bush-era political morality play of the show; in fact, within the show itself, they provide perhaps the clearest view of who exactly Megatron is, what he believes, how he operates.

Again, I would've been eight when this show was airing. I had some consciousness of who the Prime Minister was, and I was cognizant of the election of President Obama, but it's fair to say that I had literally no perception of Bush-era American politics. Sue me. Most of what I know about it now, as an adult, comes from the spectre of the War on Terror on American culture. What I find striking about Megatron is just how abstract of a threat he is for almost the entire show. He almost never actually gets into fights with anyone. He's always lurking in some hole somewhere, making schemes to compel patsies to carry out acts of terrorism on his behalf. There are some occasions where he talks about Decepticons as a revolutionary movement, but only ever with a sneering self-consciousness that makes it clear that this is all talk, an obligatory performance he puts on in case anyone is dumb enough to believe him. Dude is in it for the power. He wants to be the boot. His complete immorality is what makes him dangerous more than anything—he doesn't care how many innocents get killed in the course of him getting what he wants—because even though he is a powerhouse, he's still just one guy, and he achieves most of his goals by being a liar, a schemer, a coward. And yeah, in the show, we see him take advantage of the Constructicons' stupidity/naivete (take your pick), playing on their sense of entitlement and resentment towards authority, directing their frustrations towards an invented scapegoat, the Autobots, who they've never met and don't know anything about. To me, that's political.

"Three's A Crowd" was what did it for me. Megatron's not even in that one; instead, there's this new guy, Dirt Boss, who forces the Constructicons and Bulkhead to fall in line. For their part, the Constructicons are basically onboard with the whole thing, and the language used in dialogue frames the situation as a workers' revolution (as the Constructicons see it) ruining everything. Scrapper gets something of a redemption later in the season, in "Human Error", but this is kind of unrelated to anything else involving the Constructicons; Mixmaster was always the brains of the operation, and he just exits the narrative after his attempted strike Goes Wrong. To me, the way it reads is something along the lines of like... look, the workers are stupid, and they're looking out for themselves, and wannabe-tyrants are always going to prey on that, so we shouldn't really blame the workers exactly... but also the workers should just stop fucking complaining, they should stop being lazy and contribute to society like the rest of us, and let the actually smart people tell them what's right and what's wrong. Maybe it's not exactly that. But it reads as something basically like that, to me, and sorry, but it just does nothing for me except make me feel bummed.

I realise this is probably more ink than has ever been spilled on the Animated Constructicons. Look, I don't want to get some sort of reputation as the Animated Constructicons crank. It's not that I feel particularly strongly about this, and more that it's difficult to articulate. We'll be going back to more familiar discourse territory for the rest of this blogpost.

III. Green with envy

Moving along, we come to "Where Is Thy Sting?", which is the climax of the Wasp subplot introduced in the Season 2 episode "Autoboot Camp". I think this subplot is typically very well-regarded in the fandom zeitgeist; people like the reinterpretation of loyalist Shockwave as a deep-cover Decepticon double agent in the Autobot Elite Guard ranks (his sick design certainly helps), and people enjoy the reinterpretation of Beast Wars Waspinator as a foil to Bumblebee, and people especially like the twist where you're led to believe Wasp is the double agent, right up until the episode's closing stinger.

Did anyone actually believe that, though? I'm genuinely asking. I can't remember if I got fooled the first time I watched "Autoboot Camp", or if I had already been spoiled on the twist through fandom osmosis, or if I just worked out that Wasp was innocent while watching the episode. On rewatch, it felt to me like the episode was really struggling to sell the ruse; Longarm is overtly suspicious from pretty much the moment he first speaks. This paragraph has gone on too long already, this is a cartoon for nine-year-olds, this probably literally was Baby's First Plot Twist for some number of children.

Anyway, the idea of a Decepticon double agent has a lot of narrative potential, so it's a shame that its largest footprint on the narrative of Transformers Animated is the stock-plot-iest mistaken-identity-slash-doppelganger plot to ever stock. If you ask me to point at one part of Animated and accuse it of Not Even Trying, "Where Is Thy Sting?" is that part. The auteur theorist in me notes that the writer of this one was Todd Casey, whose other credits are the aforementioned "Sari, No One's Home", which is another mid stock plot, and "Nature Calls", which is so forgettable that thirty seconds ago I reacquainted myself with TFWiki's synopsis of it and now all I can tell you is… it's about space barnacles?

And you can totally see how it happened, because on the surface, on the logline level, it seems very fun and clever. Wasp is depicted in the show as a green repaint of Bumblebee… so what if he used paint to literally swap identities with Bumblebee? This is the kind of thing that would make a brilliant Ask Vector Prime entry, but it makes for a rubbish 22-minute cartoon. The problem is it just doesn't work. If you stop and think about how to contrive the situation for more than a second, it becomes immediately obvious that it doesn't work at all.

Wasp swaps helmets with Bumblebee and keeps his faceplate up to hide his face. Their voices swap, but their speech patterns don't; one of the episode's big running jokes is that Wasp-as-Bumblebee keeps making obvious slips like referring to himself in the third-person. He hopes to get rid of Bumblebee-as-Wasp as soon as possible to minimize the risk he's exposed, but he also wants revenge, for Bumblebee to suffer as he did. As for Wasp's plan as Bumblebee… well he mostly just wants to enjoy freedom, kick back and play video games, he hasn't really thought past that.

What makes an identity-theft plotline good (I mean, when they are good), is not what it says about the character being impersonated, but rather how it tests the limits of their relationships with the other characters. What makes "Where Is Thy Sting?" bad is that it doesn't tell us anything about anyone—expect perhaps, "all the Autobots are really fucking stupid?" Is that anything?

Like, sure, if we're imagining a character thinking realistically, it's a bit of a leap for them to start entertaining the possibility of bodyswapping. But one of the first things Bumblebee-as-Wasp says to his friends is "I'm not Wasp, I'm Bumblebee! Wasp swapped our paint jobs and is trying to steal my identity!" And the other Autobots are like, "Pssh, that's crazy," despite the fact that Wasp-as-Bumblebee is in fact behaving extraordinarily odd. It's proper "hollering at the telly like Dad three cans deep watching the Green Rectangle" territory. I think this episode needed like three more drafts.

From an Animated liker's perspective, hey, maybe this is one dud amongst what's otherwise a consistently great series.

For me, this episode is sort of a flashpoint for a wider problem with contrivance in the series. That problem has a name.

IV. Sentinel Prime

As the series goes along, it builds up this kind of hilarious impression of Sentinel Prime as being singlehandedly responsible for everything that goes wrong in the show: from his mishandling of the boot camp that let Shockwave slip into the Autobot ranks, to his Archa Seven field-trip that led to the creation of Blackarachnia, to his decisions as acting Magnus nearly allowing Megatron to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. Anything Optimus Prime's crew manage to achieve, they do so in spite of Sentinel Prime's actions. In "Where Is Thy Sting?", Sentinel is the last holdout, who'd sooner believe that literally every other Autobot is "in on it" than admit he was wrong about Bumblebee-as-Wasp. The show relies extremely heavily on Sentinel Prime's too-dumb-to-live personality for humour, but also relies on it to contrive conflict.

So yeah, I just don't "get" Sentinel Prime. I am actually doubtful that most Animated fans "get" Sentinel Prime, from the opposite direction, because I know y'all are for the most part, like me, too young to actually remember the Bush administration. Did you know that the title of Season 2 Episode 3, "Mission Accomplished", in which the Elite Guard prematurely declare the Decepticon threat on Earth to be nonexistent, is a direct reference to a famous speech by George W. Bush given at the start of the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, a bloody war that was still ongoing by the time of the cancellation of Transformers Animated in 2009? I didn't know about that speech until just now. Man, I would love to read a long-form, well-researched essay analysing Transformers Animated through the lens of the Bush presidency.

I can't help but observe history repeating itself with the release of Transformers One, where Sentinel Prime is used as an analogue for another idiotic Republican president.

If you squint, maybe there's something to it, in the Animated worldview, where this absolute brain idiot somehow blunders his way into ruling the whole planet by the show's finale, through no particular competency beyond craven opportunism and a delusionally-inflated sense of his own worthiness. Maybe Animated is a show that saw guys like this in positions of power and just wanted to laugh at them, bitterly, because if your president is bombing the shit out of people on the other side of the world, then if nothing else you can depict him as The Tick.

I dunno, it just doesn't do anything for me, never did. It's not particularly cathartic or entertaining for me when Sentinel Prime gets his head cut off—I would just rather be looking at any other character. My gut just tells me that I'm not looking at a character, I'm looking at some kind of narrative voodoo doll, who's getting humiliated to prove some point about something that exists in some other reality altogether. Put plainly, maybe it's precisely the fact that depicting Trump as the blue-and-orange man… didn't stop his election, and certainly didn't stop his re-election. If there can be said to be a culture war, then shit like this was on the losing side, y'know? It's as if we're conceding that all good people can do is console themselves, and pride themselves on their righteousness, while all bad people can do is whatever the fuck they want.

IV. Animated is cancelled

To be fair, Sentinel does get some actual depth at times, shades of nuance that gesture towarads the illusion that he could be a guy who really exists in a three-dimensional world. One of the best examples of this is in "Predacons Rising". Sidenote, weird that they reused that title for the Prime movie, isn't it?

These exchanges between Sentinel Prime and Blackarachnia are some of the best in the whole series:

"I just never knew, never imagined that something this… unspeakable could have happened to you. How can you even live like that?! It's horrible! It's disgusting!" "Okay, okay, I get it! It's bad, but it's not that bad, all right?!" "No. It's worse. You should have gone offline." […] "So that's it?! You just slag your old friend Elita-1?" "Don't say that name! You don't deserve to say that name! You're not Elita-1, you mutant freak. Elita-1 went offline a long time ago."

Sentinel Prime's xenophobia towards organics is played for laughs in most of the show, and he doesn't get many opportunities to actually act on it. This episode is different! In this scene, a healthy reaction from Sentinel would be relief that his old friend Elita-1 is alive after all. But he's so revolted by her mutant appearance—and, unspoken, by his own hand in disfiguring her—that he actually can't suffer her to live! As I've said, Sentinel Prime is often depicted as a delusional liar, an Autobot equivalent to Starscream, and this episode is special because we see him rewrite the narrative in his own mind in real time. At first he feels that Elita-1 should have died. Then he convinces himself that Elita-1 is already dead, so he doesn't have to feel bad about killing Blackarachnia.

I think this dialogue is very raw, and it's extremely distinctive—Blackarachnia's "Hang on, it's not THAT bad!" is hilarious—and it was only after watching the episode that I remembered it had been written by Larry DiTillio and Bob Forward, which certainly explains why. Beast Wars always walked a knife-edge between great comedy and messy feelings.

Ultimately, though, "Predacons Rising" has kind of a nasty aftertaste. It establishes this deliciously fucked-up dynamic… and then kind of doesn't interrogate it at all?

Some of the earliest criticisms I ever saw directed at Transformers Animated concerned its handling of female characters. In terms of recurring ones that matter, it basically boils down to Blackarachnia and Sari, with Arcee and Slipstream to a lesser extent, and the shared thread I would draw between them is that they all have something fucked-up going on with their bodies. Specifically, they exist in this state because of various men in the show. Blackarachnia's hideous mutation was caused by Sentinel and Optimus, frequently framed as "look what you did!" Sari's technoorganic body and abnormal development are effectively thanks to her father, and her relationship with him in Season 3 is coloured heavily by this. Arcee's memory wipe and millennia-long coma were done at Ratchet's hands. Slipstream is implied to be Starscream's "feminine side", defined explicitly in relation to him. There is a sense that female characters are just treated differently by the narrative, and I personally think it's reasonable to term this a misogynist streak, though it's complicated by the fact that both Sari and Blackarachnia have some of the richest characterisations in the show (contrast Elita-1 and Airachnid in Transformers One, who have literally nothing going on).

A curious thing about Blackarachnia is that the show typically presents her deal as being "I'm hideous!", but many of the male characters in the show are depicted as infatuated with her. Cinemasins ding? Derrick J. Wyatt's design for her may not be as horny as the Beast Wars original, but it's still horny. The "mutation" aspect of her design is a little hard to parse out, because despite her supposedly radically altered biology… well, she looks like a cartoon character, same as any other Transformer in the show. Because Blackarachnia is the only female Transformer for most of the series, it's unclear whether the male bots react to her this way because they've never seen a woman before, or if it's a specific factor of her horrible spider swag. I mean I guess it's the latter? And I dunno, it just bums me out. Everyone is into her, but only in a way where it's taboo, she's Othered. Blackarachnia thinks she won't be accepted back into Cybertronian society because she looks like a monster.

And she's right! In "Predacons Rising", Sentinel Prime's view of Blackarachnia is tacitly acknowledged as being basically correct on a narrative level; in fact, at the end of the episode, Optimus Prime surprisingly describes Sentinel Prime as a "good bot"... when the most unusual thing that Sentinel Prime has done this episode is just be very xenophobic. As the show presents it, Blackarachnia is a monster who no longer values the lives of others, and her trauma response has turned her into an evil influence on the universe. At the end of the episode, the problem is "solved" only because Blackarachnia is accidentally shunted into another fucking universe; to Sentinel and Optimus, it literally seems like she's died, and they seem relieved about it, glad they can finally have closure on the whole affair, which was entirely their fault. This was the "original sin" which got Optimus Prime kicked off onto the space bridge repair crew, the entire driving impetus for his arc to prove himself as a hero; but this arc isn't resolved by him "saving" Blackarachnia in any way, rather by him washing his hands of her, this little blemish on his record expelled from the universe. I'm pretty sure Blackarachnia isn't mentioned again.

(You actually see something very similar with Omega Supreme. Animated is pretty clear about the Autobots being fucked up in their own ways, and a big example is Omega Supreme being programmed to heroically self-sacrifice himself if needed. In the Season 2 finale, Ratchet only brings Omega Supreme back online as a last-ditch effort to stop Megatron, and is conflicted over the fact that he's reviving Omega only to have him sacrifice himself again. The resolution to this conflict... is for Omega to sacrifice himself to stop Megatron, because there's no other option, and then Omega pretty much exits the narrative in any way that matters.)

If you're an Animated liker, the obvious argument to make is that the writers did in fact have plans for Blackarachnia… they just didn't get the chance to put them into place. We know that early pitches for Season 4 were very beast-focused, that the show staff were kind of bored of Megatron and wanted to do more with Blackarachnia. It's true! But I dunno, actually watching the show, I just don't see it. I look at the Constructicons, where it seemed like the can was being kicked down the road until they just got bored of it. We have a lot of behind-the-scenes insight into Animated, and it just does not strike me as a meticulously planned show. When Blackarachnia was introduced, I can't imagine there was a strong idea of how her arc might resolve itself, because the tension of leaving it unresolved is in fact the whole point. To me, Animated is a show constructed entirely out of these tableaus, these dynamics, which build towards a season finale but never a series finale. While people generally agree that it was a shame Animated was cancelled, if you probe deeper, you'll find a bit more of a split on whether or not is was cancelled prematurely; more accurately, it simply wasn't renewed. I think part of what confuses people about Animated is that it was never being written towards a definitive conclusion—but rather, with the intent that it it could go on indefinitely.

There's a lot to mourn about the show; it was really the last time—in fact, if you discount the Beast era for the Beast-ness of it all, the only time—that a Transformers cartoon was permitted to radically reinterpret pretty much whatever aspect of the franchise it wanted, to make up new characters, to rewrite the mythos. The "mythos", such as it were, did not exist yet; the Binder of Revelation had yet to be codified. In anything made after Animated, "Prowl" could never, ever, have been a motorcycle ninja. The ossifying brand-alignment that began with Prime and continues with the so-called "evergreen" production bible has stifled innovation in the brand; unless there is a radical change in brand management internal to Hasbro itself, there will never be another take on Transformers as radical as this.

But I guess the necessary flipside of this is that I don't think Animated is really the purest expression of Transformers that many people treat it as. Its writing and visuals achieve a basic level of consistent quality that is otherwise absent from most stories in the brand, sure, but this doesn't make it the "best" Transformers cartoon ever. Perhaps there's no such thing. "Transformers", whatever that is, it's something else. It exists in your mind as much as it exists in mine. True "Transformers" has never been tried.

Just kidding there is a best Transformers cartoon and it's Beast Machines, obviously.

40 notes · View notes