#but its mostly been just fun sketchy nonsense
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Switching out my pinned!
If you would like to see more of my art go here
I believe we are able to share these now, so here's my piece for the horrornatural zine! ^.^
#idk#it's been yeehaw geralt for a long long time but i dont really draw witcher stuff anymore#not that i've posted much of anything for the last couple months#but i'm gonna get back into it#i've actually drawn quite a bit in the last few weeks#but its mostly been just fun sketchy nonsense#so i havent posted any of it#anyways#self rb#spn#sammy#azazel
525 notes
·
View notes
Text
notions of conduct
‘…It was Burton, I think,’ he said some minutes later, ‘who observed that there were men who sucked nothing but poison from books. And who has not met youths and even maidens with ludicrous ideas of what is the thing for persons of spirit, and with permanently distorted notions of conduct that is acceptable and conduct that is not? Yet may not authors be even more poisonous?’
Some three years after I started, I am finally reaching the end of Patrick O'Brian's best-known series of historical novels. Even now, far from the beginning, I feel confident in claiming that The Yellow Admiral is the weakest in the series so far. I had mixed feelings about Clarissa Oakes for related reasons — principally the lack of direction — but it gives me no joy to say that this book is where the series really starts to show its age. With the best of his work there’s a sense of settling into a sort of comfortable groove, like listening to a favourite piece of music performed well, or sinking into an old armchair on a rainy evening. But nothing here sits easily.
The story is sketchy to the point of being barely extant. The war against Napoleon seems to be coming to an end, and for much of the book Jack Aubrey is plagued by a couple of great anxieties. He's afraid he will be made bankrupt, due to unexpected penalties associated with illegally capturing slave ships in the previous book. He is also worried that for political reasons at the end of his career he will be made a 'yellow' admiral, which is a covert form of disgrace – a promotion to a leadership role ‘without distinction of squadron’. There's a lot of other stuff going on — most notably, the promise of another privateer mission to South America — but for the most part this is a strange sort of in-betweener novel.
Some of it is very out of character. A great many words in the first half are expended on enclosure (or 'inclosure', as O'Brian insists on spelling it). The widespread adoption of enclosure was perhaps the most significant change ever made to the landscape of Britain. It refers to the process of fencing off areas of common land, and turning it into strips of smallholdings assigned to individuals. The old commons were open to all and could be used for grazing, hunting and gathering; a tenant forced to trade access to commons in exchange for a few small pieces of private land might see an increase in the assets on his theoretical balance sheet, but they might also see a great nearing of the horizon of the opportunities afforded to them.
The economics and history of enclosure are complex, and my understanding is limited to what I remember from school. But the author’s dedication to pursuing it so doggedly here seems out of character, especially considering that for the most part these books have given a great deal of leeway to the political issues of the day. Politics is only usually brought up as a matter for idle philosophical speculation — usually by Stephen, in the comfortable confines of the cabin or the gun-room.
Enclosure has serious, active consequences for Jack and his tenants, but for me the question still remains: why are we only picking up on this now? Were a reader to encounter it for the first time in this book they might think it an invention of the nineteenth century. In fact, enclosure had been going on in fits and starts for hundreds of years in England; it’s scarcely conceivable that Stephen Maturin would need to have it explained to him, as he does here. It seems a strange topic to choose as representative of the age.
As it stands, enclosure becomes a useful hobby-horse in this book. It’s hard to feel that O’Brian actually cares very much for the consequences to the individual smallholder here. Rather, the question of whether Aubrey's local common should be enclosed makes for a diverting exercise in the novel’s own libertarian philosophies. There is something unashamedly pastoral in this vision of a free and open corner of England, largely unaffected by government interference. At first it seems ironic that the only way this can be defended is by Aubrey effectively invoking his rights as Lord of the Manor; but I would suggest this is an indication that the novel's sympathies lie with a much older model of government. It is feudal, or as good as. Perhaps this oughtn't to be surprising – by this time we should know well that democracy doesn't come out of these novels looking well:
‘Everyone knows that on a large scale democracy is pernicious nonsense – a country or even a county cannot be run by a self-seeking parcel of tub-thumping politicians working on popular emotion, rousing the mob. Even at Brooks’s, which is a hotbed of democracy, the place is in fact run by the managers and those that don’t like it may either do the other thing or join Boodle’s; while as for a man-of-war, it is either an autocracy or it is nothing, nothing at all – mere nonsense.’
For all that it has very little to do with the rest of the series, the stuff about enclosure here at least has the benefit of being memorable. Much of the rest of the book is sadly ridiculous. The absurdity peaks early on with a scene in which Bonden must win a bare-knuckle boxing match, which ends up being so violent I thought he might not survive. We like Bonden – of course we like Bonden! – but it is one authorial self-indulgence too far to turn his character into a nineteenth century brawler. It feels like fanfiction.
The remaining passages on land in this book are long and dry and largely without character. The one thing to be said for them is that we do at least get some scenes with Diana, but otherwise it feels as though O'Brian had no clue of how to continue the series from here. There is the period of Napoleon's escape from Elba to be covered, but we can't get to that just yet, so our heroes must be dispatched to the most boring region of the war which has formed the butt of many a joke throughout the series so far – the blockade of the port of Brest. It is largely uneventful. There isn’t even a decent battle at sea to liven things up.
I think O'Brian would have been about 81 when this was published. Interestingly, it's at this point in his career that I think he was beginning to get some very serious literary recognition. He was being invited on speaking tours and having his work championed by a weird mix of writers and politicians from across the political spectrum — everyone from Charlton Heston to Christopher Hitchens proclaimed themselves fans. If I was inclined to be cynical I might argue that this book is mostly O’Brian playing to the gallery, without any clear sense of how these novels ought to be concluded.
The parts where the author seems to be having the most fun are the novel’s idle moments; I don’t believe these books have ever seen so many comfortable dinners with shipmates or cushy evenings at Blacks club as there are described here. And how interesting that these are not comfortable dinners spent at home with family, but semi-formal occasions with colleagues. This, perhaps, is where the author really feels at ease. Even though we spend many pages in England in this book, there’s a haunting sense throughout of being perpetually at a slight discomfort at home. To some extent that was always the case — O’Brian always did stress the escapist quality of the naval career as paramount to the happiness of his heroes — but now this is tinged with a strange melancholy as it becomes clear that we can never spend a lifetime fleeing from life as part of a family.
4 notes
·
View notes
Note
I know its petty but im honestly irriated that Jack after less than a handful of episodes gets to do more domestic things with sam and dean that Cas only gets rarely or once every few years. Going on hunts with them, eating and drinking, probably lives with them full time which Cas like never did 😑
I get where you’re coming from but it’s not bothering me because I think it’s more than just fun domestic times.
(Also Cas has lived with them for brief stretches since season 10 (he sort of came home with nowhere else to be in 10x18 for all the good that did in the long run of how the rest of the end of season 10 stuck together) but we never see it on screen and he keeps on leaving by his own volition and it sucks for different reasons but he did spend 11x03-11x07/8 and a lil bit of season 12 between 12x09 & 12x13 living with them (and there were some lengthy time jumps involved for the sake of keeping the season in real time)… I think there’s an enormous void of showing the domestic stuff but it’s not like he hasn’t had the bunker as home base for years. Shit just keeps happening to him :P I mean I get it I know I know, but I weathered season 10 in the fandom while caring about Cas… At this point anything is better than that and they’ve been so much kinder about mentioning and including him compared to season 10 than I no longer see it as a problem or something to continue being bitter about because I see the show is trying its best to meet these demands while clearly feeling it’s tied in other ways… I’m genuinely not wanky about this in the grand scheme, only in small moments which come across as bad storytelling by disappearing Cas or explaining his absence badly. And I can take them on a one on one basis :P)
Anyway, Jack doing this sort of thing is totally different from Cas doing it. The reason being Cas would only want to help, learn, and generally get masses of positive character development they have been holding off on by not letting him get too far in his arc where he wants to become a hunter, which has been going glacially slowly and has now had setbacks in season 12 after such a strong start :
With Jack, whether he seems cooperative or not, it’s still almost a hostage situation, and he’s not the hostage. He’s so powerful they can’t *not* either kill him, try and remove his power with the grace syringe thingy, or teach him all the morality lessons about playing fair and not breaking his toys that he missed by going from womb to mid-20s dude, and hope the part of him that’s human is receptive to wanting to be a good guy. Because if they fuck up tutoring him, people will get hurt. Even if Sam’s faith that it’s nature over nurture and all that is rewarded, in the time before they can be confident that Jack is going to be good and not use his *vast cosmic powers* for evil or ever be tempted to do so, they’re going to be stuck in a rather more nuanced version of Crowley trying to keep teenaged Amara around. They’re probably not going to try and use his power for anything sketchy, but even so, he’s vastly more powerful than them and it’s only on their suggestion and treatment of him that he won’t become a huge problem for the entire world. And we know Dean starts the season wanting to kill him, so it’s already complicated and at least a somewhat delicate situation.
Having him around with them is like having a bomb they have no idea the mechanism of, fuse length, or what exactly will set it off. Maybe the bomb’s a dud. Maybe they can use it in a fight. Maybe it’s going to blow them up. They just can’t know and even if everything seems to be going swimmingly, fun for all the family trip to get hotdogs, that’s going to be a heavily loaded scene where Jack is constantly providing at least some sort of conflict just by *existing* around them.
Jack’s going to be allowed to hang out with the Winchesters as much as he likes because he’s 1000 steps behind Cas - they can’t even trust that Jack is good to start with, and even if he does some stuff to prove himself in the first episode or so, I doubt Dean at least will be comfortable about having him around as just their new cute intern who gets them drinks. I mean there’s literally no point in this story happening if Dean DOESN’T feel like this is a bad idea, and there’s no point in there being this story if Jack isn’t ambiguous because then Sam wouldn’t have anything to feel he has to prove or learn about Jack if he does want to have faith that he can be good… Having him around on cases is a good way to get the measure of Jack, and they will probably be nervous about leaving him at home anyway… But I mean, there’s no story if there’s the exact same level of trust and fun as they’d have if Cas was there, and if the only thing Jack is getting out of it is the same thing Cas would, which would be mostly positive development.
I mean the whole reason the show always says Cas can’t come on the MotW is because he’s too powerful so he’d make the hunt too easy. The way he messes up is by failing the social stuff (door shut in his face in 12x03) or having a lack of faith in himself (12x09) (although he had the best success in 12x07 in the searchy asky questions part of the hunt and that was a small victory he could have built on if they’d not had all the disasters after :P) - when it comes to the actual fights he’s a massive advantage… If he was hunting with Sam and Dean, they’re competent enough to tie together all the parts of the hunt which are not Cas’s strength, and he’d be the advantage they never normally have of just being able to smite everything and not taking nearly as much punishment as they would in a fight…
Taking *Jack* on a hunt, again, the guy with the massive cosmic powers, he SHOULD be even better at resolving it all than Cas if he was truly good and only wanted to help and learn and all the plot stuff was cutesy integrating him into the family and building on personal relationships stuff, but obviously the circumstances of him being a nephilim with alarmingly unknown but enormous powers, is going to cause trouble and be the tension in having him around, even if Jack seems amiable for starters, even if it’s just, for example, Dean’s lack of trust undermining him and nothing Jack is doing, or anything like that… It’s still going to be the point of tension that it’s uncomfortable about him being there and the real problem is never going to be the monster they’re hunting but whatever nonsense Jack brings to the table. I mean at the very least he might feel like they’re smothering him by their conflicting fears about what he might be… I don’t know. Point is, in a normal MotW with Cas, he’s not the problem. In a MotW with Jack, I’m certain that he will be. And even if they are saying he’s not the big bad this season, he’s a secondary concern and early on in the season his very existence is going to be problematic and difficult for Sam and Dean - even for Sam who sounds like he’ll be the supportive one.
Cas’s presence when he’s just normal every day Cas is *not* the problem and they want him there and he wants to be there, and only outside factors would ever cause a problem if Cas said he wanted to come on a hunt with them. In 8x08 everything was great except that Naomi interrupted at the end and didn’t let Cas *continue* the amazing positive development and relationship building he was getting out of it. Cas’s presence and powers never once were a *bad* thing or a point of tension that worked against the episode, unless you count that they had to go back to the motel to play him a bunch of Loony Toons so he’d be on the same page as them with the physics of what they were fighting :P
#Asks#season 13 spoilers#season 13 speculation#I still don't have a tag for our giant naked baby#mostly because I just wanna make a tag referring to the fact he's a giant naked baby#we ain't got jack on Jack
63 notes
·
View notes
Text
Hot Buns Bakery
Hello, all! As some of you know, Ria runs and manages her own small business, a bakery. It’s been in operation for some time now, but I’ve been wanting to see it grow for a while. Mostly I’ve RPed things involving the bakery on request, or simply sit in there when I’m not busy, and I don’t know if too many people actually know of its existence.
So! I’ve set up a little description here, and hopefully this can get around to enough people so more can enjoy.
Who?
A: ICly run and owned by Riael Haskell (Riael in game)
What?
A: A small bakery shop that serves a variety of goods as well as additional services. (Additional services that may or may not be totally legal.)
When?
A: Sketchy answer here. With school and busy days lately, there’s no set time as of right now. Mostly it will be available in the evenings and over the weekend. Feel free to come by and see if I’m there, or seek me out if you want to plan something or just do some chill rp stuff. Hopefully I will be able to set specific times soon.
Where?
A: ICly in Old Town in Stormwind City, OOCly located at the Five Deadly Venoms building in Old Town, in the alley across from the Pig. (She totally doesn’t poison the cookies, I swear.)
Why?
A: Because it’s fun! Shop RP can actually be pretty neat. I’ve done it on and off for a while, and those that have stopped by have always enjoyed it too. It’s been small and very casual in the past, but I want to create a light and fun space where -anyone- can stop by for RP. There’s been a wide variety of people who have shown up before, and I’d love to invite more in. With all the nonsense that’s happened between people on this server, I’d be happy to offer a place for anyone who wants to come by and relax. And while this might at first seem like just a simple bakery where you buy your cookies and leave, there’s many more opportunities. I aim to foster RP for others as well as myself. From everyday orders, catering services, home deliveries, health inspections, to even the more dark aspects such as smuggling, break ins, not so legal dealings, and more, there’s a number of possibilities for a simple place like a bakery. And if you’re so inclined, even business relationships can be built. Maybe your toon is looking for a job, or they can supply ingredients for the bakery to use. Anything goes! If Ria can get robbed by a man who steals all of her rather inappropriate Love is in the Air pastries, anything is possible.
So if this sounds like something you’d enjoy, come stop by sometime. I’d be happy to have you around.
40 notes
·
View notes
Text
WARNING: MINOR SPOILERS AHEAD
“JENNIFER WALTERS has survived the Civil War…barely…and having risen from the rubble, she re-enters the world a different kind of hero. Fueled by a quiet rage, she is determined to move forward, to go on with her life, but the pain of the past and all she’s lost is always there – an undercurrent, a pulse, waiting to quicken and trigger Jen’s transformation into the one thing she doesn’t have control over…”
–From the Marvel Comics website
Ah, Hulk. I’ve been waiting for this one. Strange to say since my general attitude toward Marvel and DC comics is mostly derision. Can you blame me? One company protects a serial sexual harasser while firing women who dare speak out. The other is run by a Trump lover, making Hydra something of an all too poignant allegory for the company. I don’t care for the majority of their comics, especially their world events that operate as a way to temporarily spike sales, ultimately crashing and burning while receiving the hissing, clawing displeasure of both fans and critics. With Marvel, the recent blunder is Civil War II, a gimmicky cash grab for an enjoyable movie based on terrible source material that got delayed so many times that the books taking place after the event came out before it even concluded.
Just like the original Civil War, the sequel is guilty of character assassination, unnecessary conflict, unnecessary death, and ruining a whole bunch of comics people were enjoying. NEVER FORGIVE THEM FOR WHAT THEY DID TO CAROL DANVER! I mean, I don’t care about her, but turning her into a fascist ruined her relationship with Ms. Marvel, by far the best, most relatable Marvel character to come out since the Runaways. She was my generation’s Peter Parker, and now she’s lost both her idol and her friends as a result. Marvel ruined her. RUINED HER, I SAY!
Also, why was Tony Stark against Danver’s Minority Report shtick? I mean, this was a man who in the original series OK’d a metahuman registration program that probably made Trump cream his pants. Tony is practically a fascist himself. God, even Captain America is a Nazi now! I mean, so many of the heroes have turned into villains themselves and…
Aw, forget it. I could go all day long about everything wrong with Civil War II, but naw. I avoided that garbage and I don’t want to waste time talking about it either.
So, why in the world would I be reviewing Hulk, a comic that happened as a direct result of this nonsense? I should be angry given Bruce Banner, one of my favorite Marvel characters, died. I should be with the Marvel Zombies grabbing their axes and lead pipes smashing windows and burning cars over it. However, after reading about the series from Mariko Tamaki and Nico Leon, I had to check it out.
Oh, I know. There are those that don’t want Jennifer Walters to be angry, traumatized Hulk. They love her as She-Hulk! Big green lawyer lady that breaks the fourth wall, cracks jokes, and goes on crazed hijinks with Patsy Walker. Now, I haven’t been a lifelong fan of She-Hulk. The first thing I read starring her was the short-lived series by Charles Soule and Javier Pulido. That comic was fun! Like watching your favorite Saturday morning cartoon show while listening to your favorite indie rock band. I can see why people are so attached to happy Jen. She’s a blast.
However, I must defend this new, darker approach to her. As much as I love ladies having fun, I prefer when they’re angry monsters. In fact, it seems recently that a new breed of female lead comics that center on women being some kind of monstrosity has risen: Monstress, Insexts, She Wolf, Cry Havoc, and even the mass murderer Gertrude from I Hate Fairyland. These women are angry, broken by whatever is afflicting them, and they’re ready to let it out in a wave of unprecedented carnage. The best part about this trend is how subversive these monstrous women are. Their monstrosities might at first seem like afflictions, but they slowly develop into a form of empowerment.
Happy is good, but monstrous is better.
So, how does this route go for Jennifer Walters? Well, I’m happy to say that Hulk is a bold new take on the character that will draw readers in not with endless action, but atmospheric art, character-focused drama, and a unique horror tone tackling trauma head on.
The covers of Jeff Dekal take a unique approach in conveying monstrous rage. Instead of showing actual destruction, as was Banner Hulk’s trademark, Cover #1 shows Jen grasping the logo tightly, seemingly on the cusp of crumbling it to pieces. Yes, it’s a violent image, but not in the sense of catastrophic physical violence, but poignant emotional violence. Jen is trying to hold back her rage, resisting the urge to destroy. After all, that’s what Bruce did, a man who couldn’t control the beast within. Jen is supposed to be different, supposed to be healthy and balanced. However, given the trauma she suffered in Civil War II, Jen’s on the breaking point. This is what Dekal masterfully conveys. Also, have to give huge props for coloring Jen gray. I suspect it’s a callback to Gray Hulk, a version of the character that I sometimes prefer over the Emerald Giant.
Cover #2 also takes a unique approach to violence in showing its aftermath. The punch-cracked window, Jen’s hands clawing upward, indicates how she momentarily lost control and there was a negative consequence. She’s trying to hold it back again. Slip-ups happen, right? However, when you’re a gamma-radiant monster, slip-ups tend to end up sucking for everyone around you. The coloring of Jen is quite interesting. I don’t understand why her skin is pink (call back to the Red Hulks, maybe?), but I love how there is a creeping network of gray veins slowly covering her body. To me, this symbolizes the Hulk inside of Jen, the one she’s trying to hold back. It’s also symbolic of the negative emotions she feels: anger, depression, and helplessness.
I think it is important to note how green has more prominence than Cover #1. The glow is notably on the walls. It seems to mean Jen’s control is slipping. Again, so much about the conflict of the comic, the overriding theme of struggling with anger and trauma is masterfully conveyed on the covers. I’ve recently talked about the importance of covers conveying a story’s theme and hooking a reader at the same time. For the covers of Hulk, Jeff Dekal hits a bullseye twice.
So, how does the interior art hold up in comparison? Nico Leon’s style creates a deceptively quiet atmosphere that aches with tension. Matt Milla’s coloring adds to this with a soft color palette. In issue #1’s opening scene, Jen’s apartment has a gray tone to it. It’s a huge space, some objects built to accommodate She-Hulk’s size. However, now that Jen is in human mode, the objects are hilariously oversized. In this empty apartment, with its many objects, Jen seems tiny and isolated. It’s strange because it is both calm and tense at the same time. It has to do with how Jen’s inner monologue, full of polarizing emotion, turns the plainness of the apartment into a mask. Leon’s depiction of Jen’s mute expression further pushes this idea of plainness as a mask for turmoil. Reading the comic is the same as visiting the hospital for an urgent report. You’re sitting in the waiting room, made as nice and homely as possible, but you’re still tapping your foot because once the doctor enters, it could be life or death. This is the atmosphere of the comic. Sometimes, it’s suffocating, but always poignant.
Leon and Milla also shine in their portrayal of New York City. Instead of trying to recreate it as the grim concrete jungle it no longer is, they showcase the city in its present decorum of bright colors, modernized architecture, and streets full of yuppies in designer clothing. These are also the scenes where letterer Cory Petit gets creative. A scene in a subway has big letters crowded with the sea of bodies, demonstrating the overpopulated, noisy experience of living in New York. Just like with the apartment, Jen’s isolation is noticeable and just as emotionally complex, simultaneously calm and tumultuous.
Although the art team certainly excels in environmental atmosphere, they fall a little short with character design. They’re not bad, but not memorable either. It might have to do with the lack of detail. Leon’s faces are simplistic, most of them eerily similar. I noticed this when contrasted with the art of Dalibor Talajic in issue #2, pages 4-6. Talajic adds more details that make faces distinguishable. Also, ages are recognizable. I couldn’t nail Jen’s age with Leon, but Talajic easily places her from late 20s to 30s. Another thing that I don’t like about Leon’s characters are the eyes. When closed, they look like a cutesy style anime character. Leon might be influenced by anime and manga to a certain extent, but this element of the art clashes with the tone of the comic.
However, there are exceptions, most notably the amazing designs of metahumans. They are creative, unique, and diverse. Already, one of these metahumans, Miss Brewn, has become an important side character. In fact, just like Soule and Pulido’s run, I hope Jen ends up representing a number of crazy characters and exploring their back-stories.
The hallmark of Hulk is Mariko Tamaki’s writing. I was interested to see how a writer well known for her indie drama work like This One Summer and Skim would do with a mainstream cape comic. Can she bring the same complex, emotional drama? The answer is almost. There is still the limitation of a 20-21 page-count that prevents extensive development, not to mention some campy elements, such as a sketchy landlord character that acts like a Sopranos extra.
The rest of Tamaki’s writing pulls off an astonishing feat of taking the concept of Hulk and bringing it down to reality. Now, this isn’t impossible and has been done before as evidence by Bruce Jones’ amazing run. Here, however, it is even more so because instead of starting off with a tale of espionage, it’s one of recovery. I will admit to having been trepidatious about trauma as a central theme, not because I doubted in Tamaki’s writing abilities, but worried that funneling it through a cape comic would make depictions over the top or offensive. Thankfully, that’s not the case. There are no gross scenes of Jen crying in a shower naked while chugging bottles of whiskey, and moaning about how she can’t go on without Bruce! Oh Woe is a world so cruel and unfair! HAWTHRONE HEIGHTS RULEZ!!!
That nonsense is absent. Instead, trauma is depicted accurately. Jen gets up each day and tries to live a normal life. She goes to work, eat bagels at a café, and have a coffee while watching children ice-skating in the park. She doesn’t interact much with people. Currently, Jen feels the need to be alone. This will probably be disappointing to folks that love Jen as a snappy joker with lots of friends, but it’s relatable to some people that have experienced trauma. It is important to reach out and let people aid you, but it’s also helps to be alone sometimes. Being alone is a time to be at peace, to clear your mind and experience life instead of over-thinking it.
The few interactions Jen has with people are still supportive. There is Patsy who sends positive text messages, and Bradley, Jen’s gay secretary, who keeps her busy and provides her a packet of nuts after a bad spell of rage. There is also Miss Brewn, Jen’s client, who brings out the best part of the character: her heroism. Even if Jen’s no longer fighting along with super folks, she still dedicates herself as a lawyer, protecting clients from harm and making sure their justice. This is important again in approaching trauma from a mature, complex angle. Tamaki shows that there is room for positivity, to be able to function and be happy, even while in the midst of coping. There is even humor, both laughs and heroism balance out the darker parts of the comic.
As for trauma, the core of the story, Tamaki & Co. explores it in a unique way. Jen’s trauma is triggered when mentions of Bruce and the Hulk are made. It reminds her of the pain she has been through, of the fact her own Hulk form is now uncontrollable, something welling up and ready to burst. In these scenes, green becomes a dominant color. At their worst, Jen’s eyes turn green, the veins around them glow, and she glares and grits her teeth. The Hulk is trying to claw out, but unlike Bruce who always lost control automatically, Jen is able to force it back down. Unfortunately, this resistance clearly causes her pain. This pain symbolizes the agony of trauma itself, how it takes it toll on both the mind and body. Also, how long can Jen’s efforts last? It seems to be only a matter of time before her control slips completely.
The way these scenes are depicted is best described as atmospheric horror. The darkness, the intensity of glowing green, Jen’s contorting face of anger, are images that make the reader feel uneasy, ready to jump out of their seat as they prepare for the worst. This is how the best horror scares its audience, not through jump scares or extreme violence, but the dread of anticipation. It’s the feeling of walking alone in a street at night and there are either footsteps or strange noises trailing behind. You keep walking. You don’t dare turn around out of fear that it will be the moment the stalker strikes, yet at the same time its agonizing not knowing who or what it is. The creative team nails this type of horror down, with the added emotional resonance of knowing these scenes symbolize Jen’s trauma. It agonizes the reader into caring for Jen, if that makes sense. They know how much pain she is, and now want to see her persevere and survive. It’s similar to the final girl trope from slasher films.
The comic manages to balance out both the light and dark parts of Jen’s story. Seeing her both in pain and triumphant when the time comes is a satisfying emotional wheel for those that like protagonists to go through a personal trial before getting a happy ending. Sometimes, it can feel a little over the top, but never exploitative. Best of all, the story is told without the overuse of action that’s prevalent in modern superhero comics. Each issue unfolds like the chapter of a book, focusing on character development and dialogue. This approach reminds me of the masterful Vision series by Tom King and Gabriel Hernandez Walta. Both series read more like literary horror than superhero adventure. This style is not for everyone, and there will still be people that don’t enjoy this type of story, especially those who don’t want it happening to Jen. However, I have to take a stand and say it is executed expertly. Tamaki, Leon, and everyone else involved obviously understand people’s concerns for the character, and from what I have seen so far are giving her the respect she deserves.
One last thing I want to comment on is both the title of the series and that of the current story arc. It’s called “Deconstruction.” Why? My theory based on the content is that this arc, and the series as a whole, is attempting to deconstruct the character. Hulk, in relation to Bruce Banner, has always been associated with pain, destruction, and mental illness. His death can be seen as the finality of those negative attributes. It is something seen in stories time and time again. The monster, symbolic of the things that bother humanity, must die. Jen was different. Yes, she started off just as savage, but eventually attained control of her other self, even going so far as live daily as She-Hulk. That gift was taken away from her with the death of Bruce, and now her Hulk form afflicts her just as much as it did him.
Perhaps this is necessary. Now that Hulk is dead, and Jen claims the name, it’s almost saying that she has to be stuck with the original meaning of the name, not empowerment but destruction. It should be noted how the events that caused the scenario were mandated by a mostly male creative team. So, while it is easy to give praise for titling the series Hulk instead of She-Hulk to erase gender labels, it could also be said that the old male meaning behind Hulk is now inflicted upon a woman. As I mentioned before, monsters are often symbolic of everything that is wrong with the world, and anyone or anything labeled as such tends to be set up for elimination. After all, society can’t have an ugly manifestation of its dark side stalking about.
However, there is an opportunity for the monstrosity to become a form of empowerment. In the female monster titles I mentioned, monstrous women are immediately put in the box of wrong and afflicted by (mostly male) society’s perceptions of monsters. Jen is similarly afflicted, dealing with her cousin’s legacy, one of contempt from the world at large. But she’s not letting this legacy hold her down. Jen is still being Jen. Furthermore, the series would be smart in showing a transition of Jen reclaiming control of her hulk form and, on a larger scale, breaking down the old concept of Hulk and reconstructing it as something positive. Being a monster can become empowering rather than afflicting.
Only two issues in, Hulk is full of potential. If it lasts long enough and the creative team grows Jen in the right path, it may become an engaging tale of trauma, monstrosity, and reclaiming one’s identity. With atmospheric art, an emotionally complex story, and unique horror tone, I would recommend this title to anyone that loves the character. She might not be the She-Hulk of old, but she is no less fun to read.
Story: Mariko Tamaki Art: Nico Leon, Matt Milla, Cory Petit, Dalibor Talajic Story: 9.5 Art: 8.5 Overall: 9 Recommendation: Buy
Make Me Angry: Hulk #1-2 Review #comics #marvel #hulk WARNING: MINOR SPOILERS AHEAD “JENNIFER WALTERS has survived the Civil War…barely…and having risen from the rubble, she re-enters the world a different kind of hero.
9 notes
·
View notes