#but i still don’t ship it in retj or any of the other adaptations

[cto10121]

Can I ask your opinion of Romeo x Mercutio, if you don't mind me asking about multiple ships? 😄

Sure!

Well, it’s a tiny bit better than Bencutio and Tycutio, since Romeo and Mercutio have (all of 1) positive interaction the whole play, the game of wits, and it is genuinely funny and warm. Mercutio is explicitly pleased to have his bro back from what he assumes is his Rosaline doldrums and later on is confident that Romeo is “man enough” to fight Tybalt (“Marry, go before to field and he’ll be your follower”). Some interpretations have Mercutio be irritated with Romeo to the point of harshness, but I think it’s clear Mercutio does like and miss Romeo as a friend and feels the lack of him in their trio; he, and not Benvolio, is the one to ask where he is. His satire and mockery is because of his mooning over Rosaline and his loverboy antics, which Mercutio clearly feels has emasculated him (“Alas, poor Romeo, he is already dead! Strung through the ear with a love song…”), and not of Romeo himself. Romeo is also the closest to match his wit and the only one that even comes closest to controlling him—he is the only one to interrupt him during his Queen Mab’s speech and the only one who roasts Mercutio to his face and to the Nurse. Benvolio is good company, but he doesn’t even tell Mercutio to shut up even when he is accusing him of being a great quarreler (!!) to his face. I get the feeling Mercutio views Romeo is the most fun of the two. In short, they are good friends and their being foils for each other actually keeps them in good balance, which I guess is enough to satisfy most fangirls.

But not me! To me, it’s a cursed ship. I’m talking Rime of the Ancient Mariner-cursed. They are most definitely not in love, are probably not capable of loving each other, and even if they were in an even more cursed AU, they would utterly fail as a couple.

Neither Mercutio nor Romeo show any undue affection or romantic interest in each other or in any man, for that matter. Romeo actually proves himself very independent from both Mercutio and Benvolio—he ignores Mercutio’s mockery of his loverboy antics pre-balcony, and dismisses him entirely with “He jests at scars that never felt a wound.” When he meets up with them later, he shows zero guilt for having ditched and ignored them, saying merely, “Pardon, good Mercutio. My business was great, snd in such a case as mine a man may strain courtesy.” You get the sense that while Romeo sees Mercutio as a friend, he could get by without him; he is not that attached. Mercutio shows little emotional attachment too; lowkey missing his bro aside, his attitude towards Romeo for most of the play is “Tf are you????” and “Lol still mooning over that bitch Rosaline, just get laid already!!!” Not the signs of great romance.

Also let’s face it: Mercutio is not for romance. He mocks lovey-dovey behavior, thinks it is emasculating, (at least for Romeo) and makes everything about sex. He is much more invested in the macho masculinity of the feud than Romeo. It’d be all fuck and bye with him. Romeo is the exact opposite; even his shallow, mostly sexual interest in Rosaline he clings to like ivy in a tree. As a friend, Romeo is fun and witty; as a lover, he is passionate, romantic, and intense. If things get really bad, he’d be an utter mess. Mercutio would resent Romeo’s intensity (chill tf out!) and Romeo would detest Mercutio’s callousness (ugh this asshole). Romeo would eventually start setting off on his own, probably meeting other people, avoiding and ignoring him; if Mercutio insists, Romeo would rag on him, and this time it wouldn’t be a good-natured roast. Both he and Romeo would have zero patience with each other on this point and their relationship would dissolve into a toxic mess. In short, they would be miserable together and their perfectly good bro friendship would be ruined. It’s not worth it.

…And now that I’ve trashed the ship, I will say it’s not the worst I’ve seen in this fandom, ha. Honestly, I’m surprised this ship isn’t more popular than it is; it’s almost official in fan culture to ship character foils, you see it all the time in other fandoms. My guess is the insane Romeo bashing prevents it; I think there is little appetite to link up a cool and popular fan character with another perceived to be a woobie (kill this with fire) and that at best. There is also the influence of Italian RetJ, which is the only one I can think of that went heavily Romercutio, (unrequited, though, on Mercutio’s part) but Italian Mercutio is clearly a woobified version of Shakespeare Mercutio, which would pine after an even more woobie Italian Romeo. And it’s still ridiculous and even comic there. (I legit laughed at Mercutio’s death kiss, not going to lie).

In sum: Romeo and Mercutio make for good foils as friends, but as lovers their differences would render them incompatible with each other. Above all, there is no canon evidence whatsoever for it, their friendship is not strong enough to even interpret them as possible lovers, and even in an AU it’d be a disaster.

[cto10121]

Top R&J Adaptation Pet Peeves

Adaptation is hard. Really, really hard. Shakespeare especially knew it; he was one of the best adapters for theater ever, and he himself adapted R&J from Arthur Brooke’s Tragedie of Romeus and Juliet. Since then Shakespeare’s play itself has been given the adaptation treatment and hooo boy, are there doozies, misses, and fascinating failures. Most are published fanfic flops, like the ones I reviewed for my blog, but others tend to be more complicated than that. So without further ado, let’s dive into the Top Adaptation Pet Peeves I’ve personally encountered, or simply tropes and patterns I find annoying.

The two families/groups not being alike in dignity. Yes, I’m looking at all the productions and adaptations that decide to switch the whole rival houses dynamic for a race or class one. The ones who pit a marginalized group against another marginalized group, like Romiette and Julio (Black/Hispanic respectively) are fine-ish. West Side Story also does this, but unfortunately the whole “white ethnic” gang is no longer a thing now, as most non-WASP ethnic white groups are considered functionally white nowadays, so it does become a problem re: the Puerto Ricans being the underdogs to the white ethnics. Some have done a poor/rich, privileged/marginalized dynamic, but you just can’t do it with R&J; it breaks the equality of the pairing. By far the worst of these is the anime Romeo X Juliet, which had the evil Montagues be the corrupt ruling power who usurped the throne from the Capulets (????). Look, the whole point is that the two groups’ differences are superficial and stupid, and that they are more alike than different. This doesn’t work if one group is favored/discriminated against over another. It also leads to disturbing implications—namely, justifying a dangerous and destructive feud and intergroup violence and hatred in general. Another side effect is that it ruins the mutuality of the lovers by bringing in unequal power dynamics where it isn’t needed.

Juliet as a #girlboss/badass/“strong female protagonist”. Many adaptations do some measure of this by having Juliet resist even the first mention of Paris, talk back to her parents and the Nurse, and, for Gong’s These Violent Delights (Juliette Cai as the dagger-wielding daughter of a gang) and the anime Romeo X Juliet, (Juliet crossdressing as the vigilante the Red Whirlwind) actually kick ass and generally “strong female protagonist”-it up. I think this is largely a reaction to Juliet’s canonically marginalized position as a sheltered 16th century maid, mistaking the passivity and lack of agency of her status as a character trait. As a result, we get CrouchingTigerHiddenDragon!Juliet. Just no. The original Juliet, as everyone should know like their own name, was no shrinking violet, but neither was she a YA/anime shonen dominatrix either, and I feel she wouldn’t be even in an AU. Also, by this point it’s so cliché. Juliet is so well-written as she is; why stuff her into this Katniss Everdeen peg?

Juliet as an immature ~bby. Not so much adaptation!dumb, thank goodness, but I’ve seen this small trend in play productions that take the “Juliet-is-thirteen” thing waaaaaay too seriously and either have a tween-looking actress or make the actress play Juliet a facsimile of what a thirteen-year-old is supposed to be like. I especially will never forget the Orlando Bloom production that had poor Juliet deliver her “Gallop apace” on a swing. Awful.

Mercutio being turned into either 1) wacky, comic relief gay or 2) a mystical/sad tragic gay. Mercutio occasionally gets done dirty in either of those two ways and it’s sad. That French Canadian film Roméo et Juliette is by far the most damning offender of the latter take. I don’t like either trope, and I certainly don’t like it for Mercutio, for whom it doesn’t really fit. Also, I feel it’s important to note that as the Prince’s kinsman Mercutio is the most higher ranked and privileged of the three, his being forced into a “sad, tragic gay” mold feels ludicrous. Even his death comes about because he wanted to avenge Romeo’s honor (or, well, more like he really wanted a fight), not because he was Bury Your Gay’ed. Cocciante’s Giulietta e Romeo musical does something unique and has him as an omnipotent narrator, which works a little better than it should, but overall it’s also a miss. Mercutio is Romeo’s foil and a fun side character; outside of that, it’s hard to make him work without changing his character entirely.

Romeo being turned into 1) an immature woobie/“cinnamon roll,” 2) bumbling hero, 3) a himbo/idiot, or 4) evil (!!). My poor boi has been done the dirtiest in so many different ways, it’s hard to quantify or even name them. They range from flattening his character a little to “romantic idiot” to full-on Ron the Death Eater-ing him (yes, that’s a thing, twice!! See Juliet Immortal et al. Or rather not). The last two are mostly in the realms of salty fanfic, thankfully, but the himbo idiot and woobie still inform some actors’ performances. Needless to say, I hate all of this. Romeo is no idiot, himbo or not, and he is as mature as the rest of the youths (he is at least praised by Capulet as a “portly gentleman”). Canonically he is shown to best Mercutio in a game of wits and explicitly restrains himself from revealing himself at Juliet’s balcony. Act 5 shows him coldly but effectively convincing an apothecary in less than a dozen lines to break the law and sell him poison. I don’t exactly know from what stems this woobification of Romeo. Actually, no, I do. Romeo may be climb high orchard walls, playfully roast his friends, talk about how chastity vows are stupid and hope Juliet would cast off that pesky virginity of hers, and kill two characters all he likes, but as soon as he weeps immoderately over being banished/separated from Juliet and the possibility of her not loving him anymore, he renounces his Man(tm) card. Hello, gender roles-based sexism! God, I hate you so much. Please die.

“It’s a dark, ~crazy world!!! Verona is a violent, crass, tacky, dangerous hellhole!!!” Okay, so this is mostly shade thrown at Baz Lurhmann and the Hungarian version of Presgurvic’s RetJ, (the latter more fondly than the former) but it still disappoints me. The whole “fair Verona” thing aside, I think it’s clear that Shakespeare’s Verona is supposed to be a violent, steamy clusterfuck, but with the veneer of wealth and prosperity and genteel good taste that papers over the cracks. It’s the whole appearance vs. reality thing. I still think French RetJ does Verona best, and fortunately most productions and versions get it as a “quaint pretty small town is actually a hellhole” thing (hell, I think even that Gnomeo and Juliet movie made the suburban lawns nice). I just like the contrast, what can I say?

“Benvolio, Mercutio, Tybalt are more interesting than R&J, let’s make it all about them instead!!!1” This is the weirdest thing, but I think there were some web series (at least one, and no, not Jules and Monty) that literally did this, a weird modern Tycutio AU. But in general, adaptations that overdevelop the feud and the whole Benvolio-Mercutio-Tybalt thing at the expense of R&J are a no-go for me. I like the three and they all have their little crannies of character nuance, but they are less developed and the feud drama less interesting overall than R&J. I also don’t like the ships with any of the three, Bencutio and Tycutio being the most popular set-up. Canonically Mercutio and Benvolio spend most of their time either searching for Romeo or talking about him and how much he’s changed. As for Tycutio, Mercutio disdains Tybalt’s dueling skills and overall they don’t seem to know each other well personally. Both ships have no chemistry with each other and are firmly into fanon territory.

“R&J’s love was like a cinnamon roll, too good, too pure for this world…” Some adaptations, uncomfortable with some of the high-scale eroticism of the lovers, tend towards this. They’re teen sweethearts, high school, if you will, so let’s make them as cute and chaste and ~uwu as possible. Romeo X Juliet tends sickeningly towards this, but that just might be the demure Japanese culture informing the text. But I don’t know. R&J are not exactly horndogs, but they’re not dead either (horny bird metaphor, anyone? Also Juliet’s whole famous I-wanna-bang monologue). It’s secretly condescending too, in that it tries to put down and dismiss R&J as puppy love…puppy love that leads them to an uncompromising position and a double suicide, but okay. Sounds fake, but okay.

“R&J was just lust and it’s kinda their fault, actually—” Nothing will make me loathe your adaptation quicker than this. Fortunately most adaptations know enough not to go that far, but Baz Luhrmann’s version definitely has some of this vibe, along with some forced comedy. Kill it with fire.