#because ok AND ANOTHER THING. thomas was literally going to be made redundant anyway and carson was still going to give him a good referenc
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
I have very similar thoughts about his plotline with Jimmy. it's out of character and just very stupid writing. what was Thomas hoping to achieve by kissing him in his sleep? even if Jimmy did like him back, there's nothing romantic about that
it's like Julian Fellowes just wanted to punish him for being gay without even giving him a chance at a happy relationship
I think that sexually assaulting Jimmy is one of the only genuinely bad things that Thomas does and yet it's the only thing framed sympathetically. it's conflated with being gay generally and we're meant to pity him
you know what would have been a sympathetic narrative? if they were actually in a relationship and punished for an innocent love. if you still want all the angst, then you could have Thomas take the blame for it to protect Jimmy. then he would go to prison and Jimmy would have to live with that guilt while being separated from him, which also would have been way more interesting than the bullshit Anna and Bates prison plot that dragged on way too long
sorry let me rant about downton abbey 10 years later
Thomas's conversion therapy plot pisses me off so much. firstly, it's incredibly out of character. he never wanted to change to conform to society, he wanted the world to change to accomodate him. the man who said "it's not against the law to hope is it" and "I'm not foul, Mr Carson, I'm not like you, but I'm not foul" would NEVER
secondly, from a storytelling perspective, the only 'problem' is that he used infected needles. did we forget that Thomas was a sergeant in the RAMC? he knows how to sterilise needles and how to recognise and treat infection. this also shifts the blame to Thomas himself for getting sick and implies that the conversion therapy itself is harmless (Dr Clarkson says it's just saline solution)
thirdly, it's not historically accurate. I'm not an expert but conversion therapy was not at all common in the 1920s, even Sigmund Freud was against it. hormone therapy and chemical castration were barely developing let alone available to the public (I can't imagine what else the 'treatment' was supposed to be). the only practices that I can find evidence of were psychoanalysis and electric shock therapy
Thomas also mentions that he did electric shock treatment - if you really want to make a point about homophobia in the 1920s (and make Thomas suffer as much as possible), show that instead. watching him be literally tortured for his sexuality would have been far more impactful than him just... looking sweaty for a few episodes
#i had this in the tags before but i need to speak my truth#i actually have no issue with queer suffering in media especially in period dramas. so long as it's well written and realistic. this is not#because ok AND ANOTHER THING. thomas was literally going to be made redundant anyway and carson was still going to give him a good referenc#so he didn't face any actual consequences from homphobia. it was all due to o'brien's meddling. so again it's not even saying anything#about the persecution of gay men in the 1920s. when there is so much that you could do with that#of course above all else I think thomas should just be allowed to be happy. at least he's living life with his hollywood sugar daddy now xx#< actually don't get me started on how that undermined literally all of his character growth (please do get me started)#downton abbey#thomas barrow
85 notes
·
View notes