#autonomie des seniors | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

honeyleesblog · 1 year ago

Text

July 9 ZODIAC

Horoscope and character for those brought into the world on July 9 They are upright individuals, with an obviously shown feeling of obligation. Conduct optimists, they can be clever and have a significant sense for human expression. Notwithstanding, they are very delayed working. Honorable and social, they impact their current circumstance and as of now in their childhood they have numerous companions. They appreciate logical examinations, travel, disclosures, and their life for the most part permits them to travel a ton. They have solid person and temper. Their energy and functional abilities permit them to assume a noticeable part in the general public to which they have a place. They need to take care of the relative multitude of issues that worry them, explain all that is hazy, and resolve social issues, frequently contrary to stereotypical conclusions or convictions. They need numerous things yet, most importantly, to be social reformers. They can turn into an improvement factor and a wellspring of data for some individuals. What compromises them? They risk perils hiding in the water, of which they should watch out. What would it be advisable for them to yearn for? Individuals conceived today are excessively touchy, and this becomes more grounded as they age. They experience everything around them intensely, and an undesirable climate can expose them to torture. In this way, they should endeavor to foster a specific close to home childishness that they could then use to shield themselves against the hostilities of others. On the off chance that they don't, their strange awareness could jeopardize them of misfortune.

July 9 ZODIAC

On the off chance that your birthday is July 9, your zodiac sign is Disease July 9 - character and character character: great hearted, devoted, ready, relaxed, bad tempered, mean calling: writer, concierge, dental specialist tones: blue, red, earthy colored stone: agate creature: pigeon plant: milkweed plant fortunate numbers: 8,12,15,29,36,38 very fortunate number: 7 Occasions and observances - July 9 Bahai religion: suffering of El Bab (1819-1850). Colombia: Day of the Virgin of Chiquinquirდ¡. Chile: Banner Day, in memory of the Combate de la Concepciდ³n. Pledge to Palau: Constitution Day. Old Roman celebration: Caprotinia, feast (only for ladies) of the goddess Juno Caprotina, for the slaves. South Sudan: Freedom Day (2011). Argentina: Freedom Day, for the marking of the Demonstration of Autonomy in the Congress of Tucumდ¡n in 1816 (public occasion). July 9 Superstar Birthday. Who was conceived that very day as you? 1901: Barbara Cartland, English author (d. 2000). 1905: Clarence Campbell, Canadian ice hockey player (d. 1984). 1907: Eddie Senior member, American artist and entertainer (d. 1999). 1908: Paul Brown, American football trainer (d. 1991). 1909: Manolo Caracol, Spanish flamenco artist (d. 1973). 1911: Mervyn Peake, English essayist and artist (d. 1968). 1911: John Archibald Wheeler, American physicist (d. 2008). 1914: Willi Stoph, German government official (d. 1999). 1915: David Jewel, American author (f. 2005). 1916: Julio Romero, Argentine government official (d. 2011). 1916: Edward Heath, English government official and state head (d. 2005). 1918: Alდ Chumacero, Mexican writer and supervisor (d. 2010). 1922: Angelines Fernდ¡ndez, Mexican entertainer and joke artist of Spanish beginning (d. 1994). 1924: Josდ© Luis Alonso Manდ©s, Spanish theater chief (d. 1990). 1924: Julio Elდas Musimessi, Argentine soccer player (d. 1996). 1925: Master Dutt, Indian entertainer and producer (d. 1964). 1926: Ben Roy Mottelson, Danish physicist, of American beginning, Nobel Prize in Material science in 1975. 1926: Pedro Dellacha, Argentine footballer (d. 2010). 1927: Susan Cabot, American entertainer (d. 1986). 1928: Federico Martდn Bahamontes, Spanish cyclist. 1928: Adolfo Garcდa Grau, Argentine entertainer (f. 1993). 1929: Hasan II, Moroccan ruler (d. 1999). 1929: Lee Hazlewood, American author. 1932: Roberto Goizueta, Cuban-American money manager (d. 1997). 1932: Donald Rumsfeld, American lawmaker. 1933: Josდ© Libertella, Argentine bandoneonist (f. 2004). 1933: Oliver Sacks, English nervous system specialist and essayist. 1934: Michael Graves, American draftsman. 1935: Wim Duisenberg, Dutch financial expert and lawmaker (d. 2005). 1935: Isabel Coca Sarli, Argentine entertainer. 1935: Mercedes Sosa, Argentine artist (d. 2009). 1936: Richard Wilson, Scottish entertainer and chief. 1937: David Hockney, English craftsman of pop workmanship. 1938: Brian Dennehy, American entertainer. 1939: Domingo Siazდ³n, Philippine ambassador. 1940: Marდa Cristina Laurenz, Argentine artist and entertainer. 1942: Johnny Laboriel, Mexican artist (f. 2013). 1943: Soledad Miranda, Spanish entertainer (d. 1970). 1945: Dignitary R. Koontz, American author. 1945: Gonzalo Spirits Sდ¡urez, Costa Rican hyperrealist painter (d. 2017). 1946: Bon Scott, Australian artist, of the band AC/DC (d. 1980). 1947: Rubდ©n Basoalto, Argentine drummer (d. 2010). 1947: Donald, Argentine artist. 1947: Haruomi Hosono, Japanese artist, of the Yellow Sorcery Ensemble band. 1947: Mitch Mitchell, American drummer, of the band The Jimi Hendrix Experience (f. 2008). 1947: OJ Simpson, American entertainer and football player. 1948: Gloria Munoz, Spanish entertainer. 1949: Jesse Duplantis, American minister. 1950: Adriano Panatta, Italian tennis player. 1950: Viktor Yanukovych, Ukrainian Top state leader. 1951: Chris Cooper, American entertainer. 1952: John Tesh, American writer. 1955: Lindsey Graham, American legal advisor and government official. 1955: Jimmy Smits, American entertainer. 1956: Tom Hanks, American entertainer. 1957: Marc Almond, English artist of the band Delicate Cell. 1957: Norberto Filippo, Argentine painter. 1957: Engracia Hidalgo, Spanish government official. 1957: Tim Kring, American screenwriter and maker. 1957: Kelly McGillis, American entertainer. 1957: Freddie Medina, Puerto Rican combative techniques expert. 1957: Jim Paxson, American ball player. 1959: Kevin Nash, American expert grappler. 1960: Marc Mero, American warrior and fighter. 1960: Eduardo Montes Bradley, Argentine columnist and essayist. 1961: Raymond Cruz, American entertainer. 1961: Jorge Serდ©, Uruguayan soccer player. 1963: Raდºl Patricio Solanas, Argentine government official (d. 2011). 1964: Courtney Love, artist and American performer. 1964: Gianluca Vialli, Italian footballer. 1965: Plain Bello, American artist, of the band Bacillus anthracis. 1966: Eric Melvin, American guitarist, of the band NOFX. 1966: Manuel Mota, Spanish couturier (f. 2013). 1966: Marco Pennette, American screenwriter and maker. 1966: Chichდ Peralta, Dominican percussionist and maker. 1968: Alex Aguinaga, Ecuadorian soccer player. 1968: Paolo Di Canio, Italian footballer. 1968: Eduardo Santamarina, Mexican entertainer. 1970: Masami Tsuda, Japanese sketch artist. 1971: Marc Andreessen, American PC researcher. 1971: Scott Grimes, artist and American entertainer. 1971: Vitali Klichko, Ukrainian fighter. 1972: Major Simon, Chilean maker and artist. 1972: Simon Tong, English artist and maker, of the groups The Verve, Obscure and Gorillaz. 1973: Enrique Murciano, American entertainer of Latin beginning. 1974: Nikola Sarcevic, Swedish bassist and artist, of the band Millencolin. 1975: Shelton Benjamin, American expert grappler. 1975: Isaac Brock, American artist and guitarist, of the band Unobtrusive Mouse. 1975: Gaizka Garitano, Spanish footballer. 1975: Damiდ¡n Szifron, Argentine screenwriter and producer. 1975: Jack White, American artist and guitarist, of the band The White Stripes. 1976: Fred Savage, American entertainer. 1978: Imprint Medlock, German artist. 1979: Rodrigo Dდaz, Chilean artist. 1980: Udonis Haslem, American ball player. 1981: Jennifer Stone, Czech pornography entertainer. 1982: Boვ¡tjan Cesar, Slovenian footballer. 1982: Alecko Eskandarian, American football player. 1982: Toby Kebbell, English entertainer. 1982: Maggie Mama, Canadian entertainer. 1982: Andrew St. John, American entertainer. 1982: Sakon Yamamoto, Japanese Equation 1 driver. 1983: Miguel Montero, Venezuelan baseball player. 1984: Sachi Kokuryu, Japanese voice entertainer. 1985: Alejandro Guerra, Venezuelan soccer player. 1985: Paweვ‚ Korzeniowski, Clean swimmer. 1985: Ashley Youthful, English footballer. 1986: Sდ©bastien Bassong, Cameroonian footballer. 1986: Severo Meza, Mexican soccer player. 1986: Jesდºs Navarro Rosas, Mexican artist, of the Reik band. 1986: Kiely Williams, American entertainer and artist. 1987: Gert Joeდ¤დ¤r, Estonian cyclist. 1987: Rebecca Sugar, American maker, screenwriter, artist and author. 1988: Raul Rusescu, Romanian footballer. 1990: Fდ¡bio Pereira da Silva, Brazilian soccer player. 1990: Rafael Pereira da Silva, Brazilian soccer player. 1991: Mitchel Musso, American entertainer and artist. 1991: Riley Reid, American pornography entertainer. 1991: Josდ© Manuel Urcera, Argentine motorcycling and hustling driver. 1992: Douglas Corner, English entertainer. 1993: Jake Vargas, Filipino entertainer. 1993: DeAndre Yedlin, American footballer. 1994: Akiane Kramarik, American painter and writer. 1995: Georgie Henley, English entertainer.

0 notes

omagazineparis · 2 years ago

Text

Parent âgé : faites installer un monte-escaliers pour votre tranquillité

En France, 9 seniors sur 10 préfèrent vieillir chez eux plutôt que d'aller dans une maison de retraite. Cela leur permet de préserver leur autonomie le plus longtemps possible et de continuer à pratiquer des activités quotidiennes. Toutefois, ce mode de vie présente d'énormes risques pour l'aîné, surtout s'il vit seul. Par exemple, il peut faire une mauvaise chute après avoir glissé dans les escaliers et se retrouver avec des fractures ou une blessure invalidante. Pour cela, un aménagement d'intérieur doit être réalisé afin de permettre à la personne concernée de vivre confortablement et en sécurité. Si la pose de revêtements antidérapants et de barres d'appui est nécessaire, l'installation d'un monte-escaliers ou d'une chaise élévatrice l'est tout autant, pour plus d'accessibilité. Les risques de chute des personnes âgées qui vivent seules Avec l'âge, les capacités physiques s'amenuisent considérablement, ce qui provoque une perte progressive de mobilité. L'accès aux niveaux supérieurs de la maison devient un véritable calvaire, surtout pour les seniors qui vivent dans un immeuble. Dans ces conditions, la probabilité de subir des accidents domestiques est très forte. En France, les chutes sont d'ailleurs la première cause de mortalité chez les seniors. Plus précisément, elles touchent près de 35 % des aînés de 65 à 79 ans, 45 % des individus qui ont entre 80 et 89 ans et 55 % des personnes ayant plus de 90 ans, selon les chiffres officiels. On estime à environ 400 000 le nombre d'aînés qui font une chute chaque année et près de 12 000 en meurent. Ceux qui réussissent à s'en sortir se retrouvent souvent avec des fractures. Cependant, après un accident pareil, de nombreux seniors ne s'en remettent pas vraiment. Certains n'osent plus emprunter les escaliers et d'autres préfèrent solliciter de l'aide pour atteindre un étage de la maison. À juste titre, car, selon les statistiques, le risque de tomber à nouveau dans les jours ou mois qui suivent une chute reste très élevé. Pour toutes ces raisons, la pose d'un monte-escaliers s'avère indispensable. Ce dispositif permettra à votre proche de se rendre plus facilement dans les pièces situées à l'étage. Mais, pour éviter toute mauvaise surprise, les travaux d'installation ne doivent pas être confiés à n'importe qui. Pour avoir l'esprit tranquille, contactez un installateur de monte-escaliers afin de bénéficier d'un travail impeccable et de qualité. Quelles que soient la configuration du logement et la complexité des travaux, des professionnels sont en mesure de poser aisément cet équipement en intérieur comme en extérieur. En quoi un monte-escaliers est-il avantageux ? Vous l'aurez compris, des aménagements d'intérieur sont indispensables pour avoir l'esprit tranquille et continuer à vivre en toute sécurité à son domicile. Dès que l'accès aux niveaux supérieurs de la maison commence à devenir difficile, vous devez immédiatement penser à poser un monte-escaliers. Pour vous convaincre de l'importance de cet équipement, voici ses avantages : - il permet d'optimiser la sécurité de l'utilisateur, - il améliore le confort, - il aide à conserver son autonomie et sa liberté, - il est ergonomique et facile à utiliser. N'hésitez pas à vous renseigner auprès des professionnels spécialisés. Un monte-escaliers permet d'optimiser la sécurité de l'utilisateur En installant un monte-escalier, vos parents ou grands-parents pourront se rendre dans toutes les pièces de leur maison sans craindre de glisser dans les escaliers. De plus, cet équipement possède des accoudoirs et une ceinture qui s'ajuste à la taille de son utilisateur, ce qui permet d'éviter les chutes. De plus, certains modèles embarquent des détecteurs d'obstacles et peuvent se bloquer automatiquement pour éviter tout risque d'accident. Aujourd'hui, de nombreux fabricants proposent des monte-escaliers équipés de batteries qui se rechargent automatiquement. Celles-ci permettent au dispositif de continuer à fonctionner en cas de coupure de courant. Sujet connexe : L’importance des grands-parents dans la vie des enfants : des liens affectifs forts Une chaise montante électrique améliore le confort Pour monter à l'étage, il suffit de s'installer confortablement dans le fauteuil, d'ajuster sa ceinture de sécurité et d'appuyer sur le bouton de marche. Cela évite à l'aîné d'emprunter les escaliers et de se dépenser. Pour optimiser le confort, des marques commercialisent des équipements avec des assises fixes et stables qui empêchent les mouvements accidentels. Vous trouverez également des machines avec des fauteuils pivotants pour faciliter la sortie de l'utilisateur. L'équipement aide les personnes âgées à conserver leur autonomie et leur liberté Pour des raisons professionnelles ou autres, les familles et les aidants familiaux ne peuvent pas tout le temps être aux petits soins de leurs aînés. Même si vous embauchez des auxiliaires de vie, il peut arriver des moments où ces intervenants ne seront pas disponibles. Avec l'installation d'une chaise montante, votre proche peut conserver son autonomie et se déplacer librement d'un étage à l'autre et dans toutes les pièces de sa maison. Un appareil ergonomique et facile à utiliser La présence de manettes joystick de commande sur l'appareil peut faire peur aux aînés réfractaires aux nouvelles technologies. Pourtant, ces boutons facilitent la prise en main et la conduite de la chaise élévatrice. Vous n'avez pas besoin d'être un geek pour comprendre le fonctionnement du dispositif. Un briefing de 2 minutes avec un technicien suffit pour tout assimiler. Fixées en bas et en haut des escaliers, les télécommandes permettent de commander à distance la machine. Comment savoir si vous pouvez installer ce système chez votre proche âgé ? Le monte-escaliers est un dispositif parfaitement adapté à tout type d'intérieur. Comment nous l'avons mentionné, quelles que soient la configuration du logement et la complexité des travaux, l'installation de cet équipement peut se faire avec l'aide de professionnels. Autrement dit, que le domicile de votre proche ait un escalier droit, tournant, courbe, étroit ou large, des solutions existent. Si les escaliers de vos parents sont droits, alors un monte-escaliers droit fera parfaitement l'affaire. La pose de ce type d'équipement demande moins d'effort. En revanche, s'il s'agit d'escaliers avec des courbes ou des virages, cela nécessite un appareil tournant et une installation sur mesure tout comme pour les escaliers hélice ou en spirale. En somme, tous les escaliers peuvent abriter ce type de dispositif. Vous n'avez alors aucune inquiétude à avoir par rapport à la pose de l'équipement chez l'un de vos parents. Installation d'un monte-escaliers : budget et durée Le prix de l'installation d'un monte-escaliers dépend de plusieurs éléments : - la qualité de la machine, - le niveau de personnalisation de l'appareil, - la complexité de l'installation. Le prix des modèles diffère d'un fabricant à un autre et selon les gammes. Plus le niveau de personnalisation est avancé, plus le coût de l'équipement est important. L'installation prend également en compte la complexité de l'installation. Le tarif de la pose d'un monte-escaliers droit n'est pas le même que celui de l'installation d'un dispositif en spirale. En ce qui concerne la durée des travaux, elle est d'au moins 4 heures quand on fait appel à des experts. Si l'installation est complexe, l'opération peut durer 24 heures. Read the full article

0 notes

xtruss · 2 years ago

Text

US-Led Unipolar Hegemonic Order An Abnormal State, Will Be Reformed Sooner or Later

— Global Times | April 11, 2023

Illustration: Liu Rui/Global Times

In more than 30 years since the end of the Cold War, human society has been stuck in US' unipolar hegemony. It is by no means an abnormal state. Yet Washington is addicted to it and wishes to make it a lasting norm. When a growing number of countries start to pursue benign adjustments to that global order, the US seems to have ants in the pants.

Perhaps being shocked by the ongoing flurry of visits of European leaders to China, French President Emmanuel Macron's appeal on "strategic autonomy," and China's contributive role as a peace builder in the Middle East, some American observers and media outlets can hardly hide their anxiety. Fox News is quite blatant, claiming, "The Future is Now: China, Russia revert to pre-1989 world and fundamentally challenge the US-led West" on Monday. A headline in The Washington Post on the same day read, "China's new world order is taking shape." The article underlined that China's new initiatives over "security" and "civilization" essentially challenge the architecture of the US-led order.

What kind of order is the US-led order? There is only one answer to that question - the unipolar hegemonic order under US domination. Those analyses simply unveiled that the US is fearing losing its global leadership position. The country does not know how to face a different, multipolar order. Actually, it is resisting the arrival of such an order.

Therefore, whenever there are countries that are unwilling to obey US leadership or get in the way of the US cementing its leading role, Washington would feel like having a fishbone stuck in its throat and will waste no time bringing out its stick. To the US' surprise, today, even Saudi Arabia and France are tired of tolerating the US bossing them around or demanding obedience. That must have touched Washington's sensitive nerves.

Fox News compares the current international relations to the Cold War. This is an ignorant charge. "The prominent feature of the world structure before 1989 was group confrontation. Let's see, who is now promoting group confrontation? It is the US," Yang Xiyu, a senior research fellow at the China Institute of International Studies, told the Global Times.

It is the US that has been taking its allies under a tight grip in an attempt to jointly contain China and Russia, launch economic wars, proxy wars, diplomatic coercion and spread smears. And now, it wants to portray itself as a "gentle giant," who is reluctant to be challenged. Few will buy this anymore.

What the US confronts is neither China nor Russia, but the trend of a multipolar world, and the call for an improved international order, Xu Liang, an associate professor at the School of International Relations of Beijing International Studies University, told the Global Times.

All countries want independent development but the US attempts to maintain the hegemonic order - this has become the contradiction of the era. The so-called rules-based order is an order that skirted around political colonization after the end of the World War II, but inherited economic and ideological colonization in new forms. The order is not offering fair development opportunities for developing countries. It is unjust and unsustainable. But Washington has long been calling black white in this regard, Shen Yi, an international relations professor at Fudan University, told the Global Times.

Whether the US likes it or not, the momentum of calling for a new world order is rising. De-dollarization has begun. Countries are focusing more on regional multilateral cooperation. The significance of BRICS is surging while the influence of G7 is declining. Organizations such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation are becoming more popular. These are trends that the US cannot reverse by creating enemies, piling pressure or imposing coercion on others.

In a recent exclusive interview, Clare Daly, an Irish politician and member of the European Parliament, told the Global Times that the world is in a new dawn of world relations, as the US has lost the hearts and minds of most of the world's population, while desperately trying to keep the EU, maybe Australia and the UK, as the last group of people to its side.

According to Yang, the trend of multi-polarization will not stop, and the US will do everything in its power to stop this trend. It will continue to shape enemies, boost camp confrontation, and grasp tight its satellite countries. However, no matter what the US does, and what kind of strategy it employs, in the end, the US' dominant position will be gone with the wind, which will be the fundamental sign of multi-polarization.

The more the US resists such trends by abusing its hegemony, the more division, confrontation and destruction it will bring to the world, which will, in turn, trigger more resistance to the US' nostalgia for a unipolar world.

0 notes

sosehpad · 11 months ago

Text

Espérance de vie sans incapacité en France : Un recul inattendu en 2022

🔍 L'espérance de vie sans incapacité à 65 ans en France connaît un recul en 2022. Un signe d'alerte ou une fluctuation temporaire ? Les experts analysent. #Santé #Seniors #Drees #EspéranceDeVie

L’espérance de vie sans incapacité à 65 ans, un indicateur crucial pour évaluer la qualité de vie des seniors, a connu une baisse en 2022, selon les dernières études de la direction des études et des statistiques des ministères sociaux (Drees). Après une tendance haussière depuis 2008, cette diminution interroge sur les dynamiques de long terme de la santé des personnes âgées en France. Cette…

View On WordPress

#autonomie des seniors #seniors

0 notes

empires-anomalies · 2 years ago

Text

The Aztec Empire or the Triple Alliance (Classical Nahuatl: Ēxcān Tlahtōlōyān, [ˈjéːʃkaːn̥ t͡ɬaʔtoːˈlóːjaːn̥]) was an alliance of three Nahuaaltepetl city-states: Mexico-Tenochtitlan, Tetzcoco, and Tlacopan. These three city-states ruled that area in and around the Valley of Mexico from 1428

The alliance waged wars of conquest and expanded after its formation. The alliance controlled most of central Mexico at its height, as well as some more distant territories within Mesoamerica, such as the Xoconochco province, an Aztec exclave near the present-day Guatemalan border. Aztec rule has been described by scholars as "hegemonic" or "indirect".[6] The Aztecs left rulers of conquered cities in power so long as they agreed to pay semi-annual tribute to the alliance, as well as supply military forces when needed for the Aztec war efforts. In return, the imperial authority offered protection and political stability and facilitated an integrated economic network of diverse lands and peoples who had significant local autonomy.

Aztec religion was a monistic pantheism in which the Nahua concept of teotl was construed as the supreme god Ometeotl, as well as a diverse pantheon of lesser gods and manifestations of nature. The popular religion tended to embrace the mythological and polytheistic aspects, and the empire's state religion sponsored both the monism of the upper classes and the popular heterodoxies.

The empire even officially recognized the largest cults such that the deity was represented in the central temple precinct of the capital Tenochtitlan. The imperial cult was specifically that of the distinctive warlike patron god of the Mexica Huitzilopochtli. Peoples were allowed to retain and freely continue their own religious traditions in conquered provinces so long as they added the imperial god Huitzilopochtli to their local pantheons.

By the reign of Ahuitzotl, the Mexica were the largest and most powerful faction in the Aztec Triple Alliance.

Building on the prestige the Mexica had acquired over the course of the conquests, Ahuitzotl began to use the title "huehuetlatoani" ("Eldest Speaker") to distinguish himself from the rulers of Texcoco and Tlacopan. The alliance still technically ran the empire. But the Mexica Emperor now assumed nominal if not actual seniority.

Ahuitzotl was succeeded by his nephew Moctezuma II in 1502. Moctezuma II spent most of his reign consolidating power in lands conquered by his predecessors.In 1515, Aztec armies commanded by the Tlaxcalan general Tlahuicole invaded the Purépecha Empire once again.The Aztec army failed to take any territory and was mostly restricted to raiding. The Purépecha defeated them and the army withdrew.

Moctezuma II instituted more imperial reforms.The death of Nezahualcoyotl caused the Mexica Emperors to become the de facto rulers of the alliance. Moctezuma II used his reign to attempt to consolidate power more closely with the Mexica Emperor.He removed many of Ahuitzotl's advisors and had several of them executed. He also abolished the quauhpilli class, destroying the chance for commoners to advance to the nobility. His reform efforts were cut short by the Spanish Conquest in 1519.

The Spanish expedition leader Hernán Cortés landed in Yucatán in 1519 with approximately 630 men (most armed with only a sword and shield).

Eventually, the Spanish-led army assaulted the city both by boat and using the elevated causeways connecting it to the mainland. The attackers took heavy casualties, although the Aztecs were ultimately defeated. The city of Tenochtitlan was thoroughly destroyed in the process. Cuauhtémoc was captured as he attempted to flee the city. Cortés kept him prisoner and tortured him for a period of several years before finally executing him in 1525.

#historic #educational #humanity #anthropology #world history #america #north america #empire #war #spanish

7 notes · View notes

augustineabbot · 3 years ago

Text

Emotional abuse refers to acts or omissions that harm a child's sense of self in a way that causes, or could cause, behavioural, cognitive and emotional disorders.

Emotional abuse refers to acts or omissions that harm a child's sense of self in a way that causes, or could cause, behavioural, cognitive and emotional disorders. Physical neglect may involve inadequate food, clothing, shelter, cleanliness, medical care and protection from harm. Emotional neglect occurs when a child's need to feel loved, wanted, safe and worthy is not met.. But the 'beef' with Hamilton wardrobe seems to be that he avoids standard, sombre hued legjobb kutyaruha esőkabát suiting and embraces colour, print and decoration.This year Elle Style Awards saw him eschew a classic suit by opting for one in a rich paprika colour by Marni good on him, I saw. He a youthful looking guy and there plenty of time for a classic grey pinstripe.With Naomi Campbell at a GQ event in 2007 (Photo: AP)Likewise his fondness for an eyecatching floral bomber jacket or two by Oliver Spencer; the guy attending a fashion show where he be papped and sat alongside the international style press an eye catching, vivid statement piece is par for the course.A quiet moment at the British Grand Prix 2015 (Photo: Getty)Which isn to say he a style icon; he'd do well to consider dialling things down a notch to focus on one particularly splashy piece instead of pairing it, for example, with distressed, ripped, zip riddled denim and a stonking pair of studded high tops.But we all have a style progression and David Beckham, now firmly part of the Best Dressed firmament, experimented with left of centre fashion as a young sportsman who just nike delta force ár come in to money and was being smučarski kombinezon hlače beseeched by designer brands.Hopefully, as Hamilton's style evolves, so too will the curious cockatiel haircut. Even Beckham donned corn rows at one point; we all have our style cross to bear.. The more powerful diesel 4x4s will offer towing capacities of up to 2,500kg.Alongside this VW is looking at the feasibility of a GTE plug in hybrid version of the Tiguan. A version was shown at Frankfurt, using the same powertrain as the Passat GTE, it blends a 154bhp 1.4 litre turbocharged petrol engine with an electric motor to give a total of 215bhp."This is still under investigation," Treptow told Auto Express.However, the concept version promised a claimed combined figure of 149mpg, CO2 emissions of 42g/km, and an all electric range of 30 miles. Emissions as low as that would ensure (under current legislation) that the GTE would be free from road tax and exempt from the London szemüveg csúszásgátló Congestion Charge. I, too, went to high school in the midwest during the preppy era. I actually longed for some of that attire but the closest I came was a Hunt Club polo shirt from JCPenney (not nearly as nice as a real Ralph Lauren polo shirt, oh well) and a pair of Dexter deck shoes. Then parachute pants became popular and I wanted a pair of those too. She has also written features on topics including tourism on Catalina Island, a helicopter pilot school at John Wayne and nobody's favorite subject: taxes. Although we do not pre screen comments, we reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us, and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. We might permanently block any user who abuses these conditions.. "These brief company reports contain information that can benefit expert and novice investors who want to stay ahead of the market."All stocks and options shown are examples only ghete de schi not recommendations to buy or sell. Our picks do not cizme vara cu toc represent a positive or negative outlook on any security. Potential returns do not take into account your trade size, brokerage commissions or taxes expenses that will affect actual investment returns. Spy shots and exclusive images of the new Audi A8 saloon plus details on its weight saving tech, 3 autonomy and hybrid engines The next Audi A8 will hit back at the Mercedes S Class and BMW 7 Series on the technology and efficiency fronts.The German brand's flagship A8 saloon has a history of lightweight construction but engineers admit that responding to customer demands is likely to bring a small gain in kerbweight for the new version. The car's bare metal construction is around 50kg heavier than the structure of the existing A8.Three key factors are said to have caused the new Audi A8's increase in mass. The first is the requirement for a full length panoramic sunroof, because this demands extra bracing to avoid chassis flex. I think mustang női ikea molnig csillár cipő árgép a lot of people were quite moved, by their faces. Obviously, it nike black tn 001 means quite a lot to them. Said she was honoured to be in the show.. After adventure came culture. The next section, entitled American Painting Now, contained an exhibit of 23 huge paintings by well known artists of the 1960s, commissioned for the pavilion by head curator Alan Solomon. The list of artists read like a Who's Who of modern art, and included James Rosenquist, Claes Oldenburg, Andy Warhol, Jaspter Johns, Jim Dine, Ellsworth Kelly, Barnett Newman, Robert Rauschenberg and Roy Lichtenstein. A change management inbox was also created to receive the ongoing communications and it was accessible to everyone. Training sessions were held with supervisors and staff by our Senior Advisor, Change Management. There were two modules that were introduced: Communicating to Drive Change and Coaching to Drive Change. I baby nike trainers truly think Huff hates hitting at AT but would never go public. Occassionally when the Giants need a basic normal base hit to LF Huff has it within his repetoire to his swing approach and that way The other 99% of the time he unfortuantely is a hitter who makes up his mind and starts his swing (almost) without reading pitch/location. Last year Huff guessed correctly most of the time especially since he was a new hitter in the National League. The developer wanted the location for a lot of reasons. It is right off the freeway, in between Salt Lake and Provo, and next to Cabelas. The variety of businesses and prime location should attract male and female consumers, especially with the new mall bringing many stores to Utah for the first time..

1 note · View note

dointoomuchsworld · 4 years ago

Text

URT amidst the Pharma war

WUpon selecting a communication theory for this blog entry, I decided, why not- let’s just Google search: “what communication theory can be related to the anti-vax crowd”? The top six search results and their links that pop up spew these headlines and additional phrases:

1. “The anti-vaccination infodemic on social media: A behavioral…: However, the anti-vaccination movement is currently on the rise, spreading online misinformation about vaccine safety and causing a worrying…” (www.journals.plos.org)

2. “How to respond to vocal vaccine deniers in public- WHO: a vocal vaccine denier is defined in this document as a person who is not only denying scientific consensus but also actively advocating against vaccination…” (World Health Organization 2017 Regional Office for Europe).

3. “Vaccine hesitancy is a problem attracting growing attention and concern.” (www.sciencedirect.com)

4. “The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination… Distrust in scientific expertise is dangerous… Results show that even if anti-vaccine narratives have a small persuasiveness, a large part of the population will be rapidly exposed to them. ” (www.nature.com)

5. “Conspiracy Beliefs, Rejection of Vaccination, and…: Many conspiracy theories appeared along with the Covid-19 pandemic. Since it is documented that conspiracy theories negatively affect…” (www.frontiersin.org)

6. “Combating Vaccine Hesitancy: Teaching the Next Generation… In 1999, the anti-vaxxer movement, an organized body of people who refuse to vaccinate and blaming vaccines for health problems” (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)

Well, this didn’t answer my question. It was surely a lot to read as we dive into my entry here, and it slapped someone with my way of thinking with some shut-down labels: dangerous, misinformed, science-denier, nonconsensual, behaviorally problematic, conspiracist, rejecter.

Do you know what these Google search results say to me? Censorship.

I am selecting the communication theory of Uncertainty Reduction Theory to apply towards my discussion of the pro-vaccine/anti-vaccine war.

Uncertainty Reduction Theory (URT) asserts that “people have a need to reduce uncertainty about others by gaining information about them” (Berger, C.R., & Bradac, J.J.) The information gained can be used to predict the others’ behavior. Reducing uncertainty can be particularly beneficial in relationship development, so it is more typical amongst people when they expect or want to develop a relationship than among people who expect or know they will not develop a relationship.

We have a few basic ways people seek information about another person:

1. Passive strategies: we observe the person, either in situations where the individual is likely to be self-monitoring (in a classroom; in the stands of a public event)

2. Active strategies: we ask others about the person we’re interested in, or set up a way to observe that person (sign up for the same class; sitting at a different table in the same restaurant)

3. Interactive strategies: we communicate directly with the person.

I believe this theory can be used to my topic of discussion because if we are in one of the hottest moments of the ongoing anti- and pro- vaccine movement and pharmaceutical war with COVID-19 at the forefront of it all, no matter which side we put our beliefs, followings, trust, or knowledge in, we seek out others with the same data, statistics, views, and agreeability. We strive to reduce uncertainty with others by gaining their information to benefit one another, and either develop ongoing relationships, or not. If we observe or interact with others to discover where their loyalties lay, we either discuss, debate--or worst of all, we fight like cats and dogs to what seems like the death--or come to an understanding and continue or discontinue the developed relationship.

Let’s begin how I feel within the war on vaccines. I, if you will, an introvert who isn’t so fond of putting my opinions out there, am publicly posting this in hopes of finding others and reducing my uncertainty about how others may feel, or find if they may feel similarly so that I may stand with them or offer them strength in opinions and studies. Or maybe, just to prompt an open discussion.

1. Pro-vaccine

2. Anti-vaccine

Unnecessary and divisive labels meant to categorize people into black and white thinking.

Where is the label for: I think it’s perfectly logical to want the ability to make decisions about each vaccine available on an individual basis for each of my children and myself?

Pfizer is going for full FDA approval and might have it by the end of this month, emergency approval has already been granted for 12-15 year-olds, and in September emergency approval will be requested for 2-11 year-olds.

How can you get granted EAU for an experimental drug in an age group that isn’t having an emergency? To protect vaccinated adults? Sacrificing your healthy child for an illness that doesn’t affect them so that vaccinated adults may think you’re a good person and may give you permission to move freely about your lives?

Nothing says I don’t believe in science more than vaccinating a 2-year-old for COVID.

Imagine being excited to experiment on your own child.

Children don’t stand a chance in this pharmaceutical industry that for decades have put profit ahead of doing what is right. Additionally but important to note, the pharmaceutical industry has not prioritized the research and development of cancer drugs for children. They rely on treating children with adult cancer drugs, which are far more dangerous, toxic, and aggressive on a child’s developing body, because adult cancer drugs are some of the best-selling pharmaceuticals for companies such as Merck & Co., Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and J&J.

Here is an incomplete current list of places making the COVID vaccine mandatory, either for employment or for on site services: Montgomery County Prosecutor’s Officer; WPAFB (when it is FDA approved); Atria Senior Living; Rocky River Senior Center; Continuing Healthcare Solutions; Newburgh Heights city employees; Supers Landscape; Cleveland State University; Kenyon College; Cleveland Clinic fertility center: spouses required to have two doses of vaccine before being able to be present for embryo transfers. Kroger grocery stores now mandate proof of vaccination of its employees in order for employees to de-mask. This is marking the unclean versus clean. Here we are, segregating healthy people and in many circumstances being told to show our private healthcare papers.

There is no place for this behavior in a free society. This is discrimination based on vaccine status.

A business in Preble County is allowing employees who have taken the coronavirus vaccine to use the fitness room while those who have not, or are naturally immune, are not allowed access. They can work there but they cannot work out there... is this about health?

What changes have you made for yourself as an individual this pandemic to benefit your health and wellness?

The NFL continues to separate their unvaccinated athletes from their fellow vaccinated athletes. Separate practice areas, separate eating areas, and de-masking only those who have been vaccinated. Discontinuing COVID testing twice a week only for the vaccinated. Not allowing the unvaccinated to leave the hotel while traveling with the teams. As if either party is not safe to be around.

As a writer considering her reader, I’m wondering if you’re celebrating right now in regards to these advances, or raising some eyebrows. As for me, it fills me with a primitive rage that I feel only when someone endangers my children.

But let’s keep going.

Vaccines are necessarily risky, as recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court and by Congress.

The risk: benefit ratio varies with the frequency and severity of disease, vaccine safety, and individual patient factors. These must be evaluated by patient and physician, not imposed government, corporations, or other bureaucrats.

The smallpox vaccine is so dangerous that you can’t get it now, despite the weaponization of smallpox. Rabies vaccine is given only after a suspected exposure or to high-risk persons such as veterinarians. The whole-cell pertussis vaccine was withdrawn from the U.S. market, a decade later than from the Japanese market, because of reports of severe permanent brain damage. The acellular vaccine that replaced it is evidently safer, though somewhat less effective.

After being fully informed of the risks and benefits of a medical procedure, patients have the right to reject or accept that procedure. Preemption of patients’ or parents’ decisions about accepting drugs or other medical interventions is a serious intrusion into individual liberty, autonomy, and parental decisions about child-rearing.

Forcing Ohioans or anyone into receiving an experimental medical intervention in exchange for freedom to go to work or participate in society is contrary to fundamental human rights.

How does one feel about the persuasion to vote YES on Ohio HB 248? How’s this for propaganda: Vote YES, join the movement, on the Vaccine Choice and Anti-Discrimination Act.

This Ohio House Bill was introduced on April 6, 2021, and is in 25% progression (LegiScan). Per this Republican Partisan Bill, OH HB248 is to enact section 3792.02 of the Revised Code to authorize an individual to decline a vaccination and to name this act the Vaccine Choice and Anti-Discrimination Act.

Why should we do this? This is a stand for health freedom, for medical freedom; a vital legislation to protect vaccine choice for Ohioans now and into the future. If this legislation isn't passed, you can expect that vaccine mandates and vaccine passports will become a reality of our future. And even if you're fine with the traditional vaccines, even if you have always gotten the flu vaccine, and even if you decided to get the COVID vaccine... Ohioans will be faced with the reality that any future vaccine can be mandated by the state, retailers, employers, schools etc., and we'll have zero to say about it. This legislation will protect all Ohioans from the dystopia that we're currently facing.

Do I sound like one who denies the expertise of science now? I stand with science. I stand with informed consent. I stand with freedom. I stand with healthcare professionals. I stand with Ohio workers. I stand with parents. I stand with students. I stand with this bill for the people, by the people.

In the year 1983, the total doses of vaccines for children from birth to age 18 consisted of 24 doses and 7 injections. As of 2020, we now administer 69 doses with 50 injections. The CDC child vaccination schedule is bloated, and I will say it from the mountaintops, no matter the reaches for justification.

Advanced Pediatric, a Cleveland area pediatric practice, is embracing the idea that unvaccinated children are not safe, and must stay masked and distanced, including from others on the playground (advancedped.com). How badly will we damage our children’s social and emotional health with this kind of discriminatory action propagated by adults that are supposed to be protecting them?

Prior to COVID, measles was the much-publicized threat used to push for mandates, and is probably the worst threat among the vaccine-preventable illnesses because it is so highly contagious. There are occasional outbreaks, generally starting with an infected individual coming from somewhere outside the U.S. The majority, but by no means all the people who catch the measles have not been vaccinated. Almost all make a full recovery, with robust, life-long immunity.

The last measles death in the U.S. occurred in 2015, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Is it justified to revoke the rights of all Americans because of the hypothetical risk that a person who cannot be vaccinated due to immune deficiency might catch measles from an unvaccinated American, rather than from a visitor or a person whose artificial vaccine-based immunity has waned? Such mandates establish a precedent for ever-greater restrictions on our right to give—or withhold—consent to medical interventions?

So as I continue, and back to the focus on the COVID fiasco that I am pondering… Per the CDC website in the association with the COVID vaccine, VAERS reports that in the last four months we have recorded more deaths from the COVID vaccine than from all vaccines combined from mid 1997 through the end of 2013. As of April 30, there are 3,837 cases where the COVID-vaccinated patient has died within days to weeks after their intervention. 384 pages of patients age, sex, location, date of vax, date of onset, who administered it, who the manufacturer is, whether they were taken to the ER, and the symptoms or prior health conditions if any.

Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (Lazarus, Klompas). Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs or vaccines that endanger public health. Barriers to reporting include a lack of clinician awareness, uncertainty about when and what to report, as well as the burdens of reporting. Reporting is not usually part of a clinicians’ workflow, takes time, and is duplicative (Lazarus, Klompas).

VAERS is a passive reporting system. Healthcare workers are not required to submit reports of deaths or injuries. VAERS only reports 1% of actual injuries according to a report prepared under contract with The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Lazarus, Klompas).

To recap those last several paragraphs, we are constantly told those who decline vaccines for illnesses they themselves are at very little risk for developing complications from, are putting the immunocompromised at risk. What we don’t often hear is that the procedure itself comes with risk and what that risk level is exactly is unknown.

What we do know is that only somewhere between 1-10% of adverse events are ever reported largely due to medical professionals' lack of awareness on the subject matter. We cannot force healthy people to undergo a medical procedure for which the administrator of and manufacturer have no liability when we know there is innate risk. We can’t trade one group's theoretical risk for another group's known risk.

We never hear any other side of this argument, it’s censored from us and never presented to us.

Many of these VAERS reports were from assisted living facilities, and we can determine this by scrolling through the log of reports. Do you trust many assisted living facilities, or do you think many of them had a choice?

As of June 18, VAERS reports for myocarditis or pericarditis in people age 6 to 29 for all non-COVID shots in the entire history as VAERS as: 394. The total number of VAERS reports for myocarditis or pericarditis in people ages 6 to 29 in the last six months for COVID shots: 590.

Without voluntary informed consent, medicine becomes violence.

How many billions of dollars do you think has been handed out to mainstream media outlets, such as your favorite radio stations, to propagate the COVID vaccine and to have your favorite channel’s or station’s host, or celebrity, holler into your car or household: to go out and get it now, because all the cool people are doing it; to save our communities. Because you’re a selfish expanse of existence if you don’t. Although they who preach to go get the intervention likely have little to no experience in any of the information I have provided thus far.

The Dayton RTA public transit system has banners plastered onto the sides of their buses in all caps that say, “I’m not afraid of the vaccine!” or “Help Save Lives. Get Vaccinated.”

When their passengers board the bus, they may show their hand gesture of the peace sign, to indicate they’ve been vaccinated. And at that, you’ll get a thirty-dollar credit in adult passenger fare upon proof of being fully vaccinated. A whole month of free rides and a promotional “Vaccinated” button to wear.

Promotions for vaccinated people are a flawed tactic for both brand-building and public health. Brands across industries are skipping beyond vaccine education and awareness to take a more active role in coronavirus vaccine acceleration.

One size does not fit all. All humans are not the same and have different risk factors for both the disease and the intervention. There is no greater danger to all of us than the dehumanization of others. Not trusting a vaccine, or any given doctor for that matter, does not make me a science denier.

Where there is risk there must be choice. Not ostracism. Vaccine choice and anti-discrimination.

People who are labeled as vaccine hesitant should really be called people who are hesitant to be coerced in the largest drug trial in history. Because it’s the right thing to do... It’s patriotic... to protect our community and, again, “although I am young and healthy, it’s the right thing to do” (Ohio Dept. of Health).

Mandate advocates often assert a need for a 95% immunization rate to achieve herd immunity. However, Mary Holland and Chase Zachary of NYU School of Law argue, in the Oregon Law Review, that because complete herd immunity and measles eradication are unachievable, the better goal is for herd effect and disease control. The best outcome would result, they argue, from informed consent, more open communication, and market-based approaches.

The safest place for an immunocompromised person who is unable to be vaccinated (there are very few unable to be vaccinated for COVID) is around someone who has had COVID naturally and is actually immune. Vaccinated people still contract and likely transmit COVID unlike the naturally immune. Similar to the pertussis portion of the DTAP vaccine, most often it’s a vaccinated sibling or parent who unknowingly spreads it to an infant too young to be vaccinated.

Let’s think about our Governor DeWine’s Vax-a-Million. His raffle is a disturbing act of child coercion and misuse of money that we could be putting back into our communities. A predatory bribe to bait those who easily succumb to a gambling incentive. I wish we had this kind of monetary dedication to our homeless, to our schools, to our mental health hospitals, to our trash clean-up organizations for our cities, to students already accepted into colleges. To the small businesses who have had to close their doors for good. What are my incentives for not getting the shot? Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Public health should not seek to manipulate. To manipulate in the name of public health is to undermine public health.

This is a marketing scheme. You are not required to take a liability free experimental medical intervention in order to be considered a good person. Those who say you are, are either indoctrinated into a cult-like way of thinking and lack the ability to see anything beyond that, uninformed, or evil.

It's one of many elite U.S. institutions to be completely decimated and humiliated by Pharma. It was gradual, then inexorable, and now it's their identity.

An article printed on May 31 states that a Miami Valley Hospital doctor says strokes are occurring in younger people, ages 18-45 years old. Dr. Bryan Ludwig, the chair of the Clinical Neuroscience Institute of Premier Health, is seeing this increase, including the 36-year-old stroke patient he treated upon being air-lifted to the main hospital campus (WHIO). This article does not yet state what leading causes we can look toward for the increase in strokes and clots in the youth, and does not even state a possibility of what it might be, though I’m sure we can make quite a valid assumption. It would seem that the press is trying to normalize things that are not in the least bit normal, as more articles arise in similarity.

Was it responsible for our Governor Mike DeWine to send out the tweet: “FACT: The COVID vaccine is safe and effective” upon immediate availability of the vaccine?

It is incredible that vaccine reactions used to only exist in the minds of conspirators, and now we pray for the recipients that they may make it through and only have to miss a few days of work. We don’t know anything about long-term effects but that doesn’t matter, because what about long-term effects from the actual disease? Everyone needs to do it anyway, even those at very little risk, because someone said so. Even those who have had COVID, and likely hold a great deal of immunity.

Those who came out in droves in opposition of HB248 stated things such as, “up to 30% of our college students are immunocompromised, and this justifies mandating those who aren’t to be vaccinated.”

What are we doing that is causing up to 30% of young college students to be immunocompromised?

Nonetheless, I find that statistic entirely skeptical. The industry recommends for all who they call immunocompromised, such as cancer patients to get these vaccines, and patients on immune suppressive drugs to get them. They want transplant patients to get them. They don’t actually acknowledge any contradictions outside of anaphylaxis. The “we must protect the herd” sentiment seems entirely feigned and disingenuous. It seems manipulative, dismissive.

Surely, there are immunocompromised people out there who are unable to receive the vaccine or others, but I do think it is rare.

A doctor who believe that everyone should be vaccinated, when questioned, acknowledged vaccine injury and death. She was asked what she would say to those people. Her response, in paraphrase, was, “Thank you for your contribution.” She views the injured as expendable.

The amount of doctors who opposed the house bill of vaccine choice was frightening. And who will politicians follow? Those who have personal attestations who are most oftentimes unheard or underrepresented, or clinicians pushing a pharmaceutical curriculum that acquires compensation based on how many patients are vaccinated?

In a statement made by ACIP member, Grace M. Lee, M.D., M.P.H., associate chief medical officer for practice innovation at Stanford Children’s Health, she goes on to say: “I think the childhood experience our kids have gone through will have long-lasting consequences that may extend across generations. We don’t really fully yet understand the total... physical health, mental health, and educational impact of the pandemic on our kids.”

Kids are durable. They can endure the worst of things, and they persevere. However, now, to grow up in a world that is censoring and erasing valuable information is chillingly monumental.

Considering that 23 million Americans suffer from some type of autoimmune disease, with the rates increasing 4-7% each year, and that environmental toxins are well known to trigger autoimmunity, it would seem prudent to implicate the distended childhood vaccination schedule as a possible culprit to this rise.

We are not smarter or more virtuous than someone because we draw a different conclusion after looking at the same information. Only one side of this charade wants to enforce their will on the other.

In summary, patients and parents currently have the right to refuse vaccination, although potentially contagious persons can be restricted in their movements (e.g. as with Ebola), as needed to protect others against a clear and present danger. Unvaccinated persons with no exposure to a disease and no evidence of a disease are not a clear or present danger. Making the COVID, and other vaccines, optional is the only way to protect the medical and individual rights of our citizens, consistent with good medical ethics.

Unvaccinated people are variant factories, says expert Dr. William Schaffner, from the Division of Infectious Diseases at Vanderbilt University Medical Center on June 2.

My use of Uncertainty Reduction Theory in Communication Studies applied to my stance I’ve taken on medical freedom enables me to seek and find reassurance with others, to find camaraderie with those who will continue to fight.

The way that I have questioned the pharmaceutical intervention so many times in so many ways throughout this discussion and at the very least find the timeline of events that have transpired to be odd, and furthermore advocate for the freedom of guilt-free choice instead of a blind acceptance to take whatever is fed to me via our government oversight, it may very well blacklist me from an exceeding amount of peoples’ interest.

BUT, no matter what one may think, or if one should ask me why I don’t find something better to do with my time -

What is more important than protecting my children’s freedom and health through social and ethical communication processes?

Works Cited:

Berger, C.R., & Bradac, J.J. (1982). Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty in interpersonal relations. London: Arnold.

Clanton, Nancy. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. 16 April 2021. www.ajc.com

Holland, Mary and Zachary, Chase. Oregon Law Review. Children’s Health Defense Team. 23 January 2019. www.childrenshealthdefense.org

Lavin, Dr. Arthur A. “The End of the Pandemic Begins, for the Vaccinated.” 14 May 2021. www.advancedped.com

Lazarus, R, Klompas M, Hou X, Campion FX, Dunn J, Platt R. Automated Electronic Detection & Reporting of Adverse Events Following Vaccination: ESP:VAERS. The CDC Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) Annual Meeting. Atlanta, GA; April, 2008. www.digital.ahrq.gov

Shimabukuro, Tom T. MD., Cole, Matthew MPH, Su, John R. MD, PhD. JAMA. 12 February 2021. www.jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2776557

LegiScan Bringing People to the Process. www.legiscan.com 2021.

National Vaccine Information Center. 2021. 21525 Ridgetop Circle, Suite 100, Sterling, VA 20166.

www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=AGE&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19

WHIO Staff. “Miami Valley doctor says strokes are increasing in younger people, shares warning signs.” 31 May 2021. www.whio.com/news/local

3 notes · View notes

noxstellacaelum · 5 years ago

Text

No, it’s not just because the guy is hot ... and other BS about a female fan base (Looking at you Veronica Mars and Shadowhunters)

So, I suck at Tumblr. I changed my name and suddenly all of my links are broken. A friend asked me to repost this when she could not find it, so apologies for round 2.

I wrote recently about how filtering female characters through the male gaze can cause a project’s “center of gravity” to shift away from the agency and autonomy of female characters. This is how we end up w/ stories where women are there (narratively) to be pretty arm candy, or objects of sexual desire, or romantic partners (half a ship) vs characters who shape their own romantic and life choices. This is how we get female characters subjected to endless, pointless pain and trauma — usually sexual assault/ rape narratives (GoT, Veronica Mars). Or female characters who sacrifice endlessly and forgive every transgression, so that a man can be redeemed/ understood/ forgiven. (Why else would Buffy forgive Spike?) As I said, I don’t think every silly, guilty pleasure TV show or movie has to be a feminist icon story. Men can tell good stories about women. And give me flawed, complicated, nuanced characters and relationships any and every day of the week. I prefer truthful storytelling, not a kind of hagiography w/a side of feminism for my female characters.

Still, I had to just shake my head — after gagging on my coffee — when I saw the recent TV Line article quoting a senior executive at HULU as saying that the negative reaction to the ending of S4 Veronica Mars was A-O-K b/c it was a testament to how much people love the show. And, that the end was all part of RT’s super-well-thought-grand-plan to make VM into a noir detective show where Veronica solves random mysteries in random places and has no friends, no family, no relationships — having been an asshole to everyone in S4. Never mind S4 Veronica’s questionable detective skills, as evidenced by her failure to figure out who was behind the bombings until it was too late. Yeah. Whatever.

Of course, I didn’t stop at the article. I had to look at the comments. The official RT fanboy line appears to be that people who hated the ending are basically weak, stupid (heterosexual, I guess) girls who are upset that we won’t get to look at Jason D’s abs anymore. Apparently, we just don’t understand RT’s art and vision. Sad, really.

And so it goes. Once again, female fans are reduced to unthinking, stupid, crying hordes upset when we don’t get our happily-ever-after.

This is such complete and total bullshit. I hated all of S4 Veronica. VM in S4 is an unrecognizable asshole. She mocks Logan for seeking help for his PTSD. She misses or ignores her dad’s health crisis. She’s casually racist. She randomly uses drugs w/ strangers. She’s terrible to her friends (Weevil). And she’s the worst detective ever. Killing Logan off as some kind of suffer porn for VM was just one more piece of the shitty story telling that was S4. Especially since there was zero narrative explanation of how or why smart, gritty teenager Veronica fell into the abyss of self-loathing, self-absorption and cruelty that defines her in S4.

To my mind, though, the mansplaining from HULU, RT and crew is one of many examples of how Hollywood dismisses female fans along with female characters. In addition to Veronica Mars, I’ve written about how Shadowhunters TV betrayed both its female characters and many of its female fans. And, just as happened w/ Veronica Mars, when people objected, the show runners and their shills told us that we didn’t understand the showrunners’ art or storytelling; that we were upset bc not all of the couples got a wedding, that fan fiction could sort out the narrative mess left after the finale. As if completely sidelining the protagonist and her romantic partner, then tacking on a rom com meet cute at the end, made it all ok.

It wasn’t OK. It was BS. And, depressingly, not a surprise when one examines how the show treated its female characters and fan base all along.

- Cassie Clare, the author behind the six book series, has hinted on her Tumblr blog that from the very beginning, the male producers and show runners behind the TV adaption did not value her heavily female fan base. The show even added a lot of computers/ tech (explicitly NOT canon in the Shadowhunters universe), and made a character a police officer (not a bookstore owner) when it launched to attract an older male audience according to Clare. (Apart from the non-canon aspect of computers, stereotyping much on who likes tech?).

More importantly, the storytelling around female characters, and the treatment of their sexuality, showed the lack of regard the show had for female characters and their fans. Where to even start:

- The show aged-up the characters — which I am totally on board with — but then cast an actor who is only six years older than Matt D. (he played Alec) to play Mayrse, Alec’s (and Izzy and Jace’s adoptive) mother. 6 years!?! There are plenty of skilled, age appropriate performers one could have picked. Don’t tell me that casting decision was the product of anything other than the male gaze.

- Book Mayrse is a complicated and not always likeable character. Totally cool. Show Mayrse exists in S1 of SHTV for the sole purpose of being bigoted and homophobic re Alec (with a side of slut-shaming for her daughter Izzy). Then, in S3, she exists solely to punished (w/ a random de-rune-ing) and then redeemed for her homophobia by becoming “captain of the Malec ship.” S3 Mayrse seems to be entirely unaware that she has other children. Not Izzy. And not depressed, and suicidal Jace. A more richly observed character who is a mother would not act this way.

-Book Izzy is sexy and body positive. And a formidable warrior. Awesome. Show Izzy is often reduced to slutty eye candy in S1. She’s turned into a drug addict in S2. And, then, in S3 and the finale, she’s charged w caretaking duties for Jace (bc the show ignored the parabatai bond bw Alec and Jace and Mayrse was absent, as noted above). And, in the climactic fight scene, she’s disarmed by Clary (who had been training for a couple of months at that point) and needs to be saved by Simon, her non-Shadowhunter soon to be boyfriend. Simon is hugely heroic in the books, as is Clary, but their heroism is not at the expense of, or in place of, Izzy’s strength and heroism. (Or, maybe it’s that show Simon saves show Izzy from show Clary that’s the problem: book Izzy would not have been bested by Clary, book Clary never would have attacked her friends and chosen family, and the dark Clary made zero narrative/ emotional sense.

- Clary, the protagonist, is wholly sidelined in 3B and the finale. I won’t go down this rabbithole again, except to say that the show’s decision to strip Clary of her entire narrative arc — her mother, her father figure, her memories, her magic, her identity her chosen family, and her love — deeply, deeply betrayed the character and her fans.

- And, as I’ve written before, the dark Clary storyline seemed more about putting Kat M. In sexy clothes and having her act in a sexually aggressive way toward Jace (let’s call it what it was - the show hinted that she went down on Jace in a club while Jace was distraught over losing Clary and basically roofied) (bc sexually aggressive women are either slutty or evil on SHTV, I guess.). It made no sense.

-The whole Climon storyline was cringe worthy, and her weird shame-y commentary on Jace’s past sex life made no sense either.

- Maia hooking up w/ Jace behind a bar, and forgiving her attacker.

The list goes on and on.

I am sick and tired of Hollywood reducing female characters and female fans to unsophisticated, silly, shallow people looking only for the love of a (generally straight white) man. I am sick of shows sacrificing female characters and their fans to tell stories about other characters, even when those stories are worthy. (We shouldn’t have had to choose between, say, Magnus, Alec and Malec, and Clary, Jace and Clace.). I am sick of characters and fans serving as a mirror or vehicle for other characters’ stories.

Female fans watch TV. We buy movie tickets. We participate in fandoms. Stop telling us that we should be content w/ scraps from the storytelling table.

#SHTV #clary fairchild #veronica mars #veronica mars season 4 #mayrse #Jace Wayland #Clace #cassandra clare #tmi #shadowhunters

101 notes · View notes

chiseler · 4 years ago

Text

"¡Viva Puerto Rico libre!”

Lolita Lebrón

Amid all the righteous shrieking and arm-flapping that accompanied the coverage of the January 6th storming of the U.S. Capitol by a mob of yahoos and half-wits, commentator after commentator proclaimed such an assault on the sanctity of The People’s House was unprecedented, at least since the torching of the Capitol building during the War of 1812. If your limiting the parameters to “A mob of yahoos and half-wits spurred on by clumsy bald-faced lies and ridiculous conspiracy theories stormed the Capitol building, convinced they’d be able to overturn the results of a presidential election by making a terrible mess,” then yes, sure, I can’t think of a comparable example in our history. If, however, these commentators are speaking in more general terms about violent, politically-motivated attacks inside the American International Pictures logo, then I’m afraid, yet again, a brief history lesson is in order. Let’s work our way backwards from January 6th.

In a strange and eerie precedent, if on a smaller scale, on the afternoon of July 24th, 1998, Russell E. Weston Jr. stormed through the Capitol’s document door, an entrance generally reserved for elected officials and their staffs. According to interviews after the fact, Weston was a paranoid schizophrenic off his meds who was convinced America was about to be besieged both by a strange new disease and an army of cannibals, and wanted our nation’s leaders to know about it.

Jacob Chestnut, Jr.

When Weston zipped through the metal detector just inside the entrance, the .38 Smith & Wesson revolver he was carrying set off the alarm. After Capitol police officer Jacob Chestnut, Jr. asked him to kindly back up and go through the machine again, Westin drew his revolver and shot Chestnut in the head, killing him. He then took off down the hall, ducking into what turned out to be a suite of offices occupied by senior Republican congressmen. At that particular moment, it was also occupied by plainclothes special agent John Gibson, who’d drawn security detail that day. Weston promptly shot Gibson as well, but before he died, Gibson returned fire, shooting Weston four times. Weston survived, and is presently still being held in an institute for the criminally insane.

Fifteen years earlier, on November 7th, 1983, members of a third-rate radical group calling themselves The Armed Resistance Unit (ARU) planted a bomb on the second floor of the Senate Wing. When it went off around midnight, no one was hurt, but the blast did cause an estimated $250,000 in damage. A communique released by the ARU said the bombing was in response to American military action in Grenada and Lebanon. Thirteen years before that, on March 1st, 1971, The Weathermen, in what would soon be recognized as their standard m.o., planted a bomb in one of the Capitol’s many bathrooms. Again it was timed to go off in the middle of the night. No one was hurt, but the next day a few people were inconvenienced. In taking credit for the bombing, The Weathermen claimed it was in response to the continued U.S. bombing of Laos. Or maybe just Laotian bathrooms—amid all the hippie lingo and Marxist doggerel, it was hard to tell.

But those were all small potatoes, tepid attacks waged by crazy people driven by delusional fantasies and supposed revolutionary groups who had no clear idea what a real revolution entailed. But exactly seventeen years before the Weathermen, in essence, flushed an M-80 down a congressional toilet and called it a mighty blow against U.S. imperialism, it was a different story, which may explain why it’s so forgotten today.

In order to fully understand the events of March 1st, 1954, we need to step back a ways, to the end of the Spanish-American War.

As part of the 1898 Treaty of Paris, which brought the war to its end, Spain handed control of Puerto Rico over to the U.S.. There was just one problem with this. A year earlier, in the 1897 Carta de Autonomía, Spain had already granted Puerto Rico independence from colonial rule, meaning come the end of their scuffle with the States, Spain was no longer in any position to be handing Puerto Rico over to anyone.

Well, everyone seemed to overlook this little technicality, and Puerto Rico became an American commonwealth.

In 1950, Congress passed the Puerto Rico Federal Relations Act, which declared the U.S. would continue to provide security for Puerto Rico and handle any international treaties that might involve them. At the same time, the people of Puerto Rico would be free to elect their own government, so long as the U.S. approved of their choices. While Puerto Ricans would be considered U.S. citizens, they would not be allowed to vote for president, nor would they have any representatives in Congress.

This did not sit especially well with the Puerto Rican Nationalist Party, which had been pushing for Puerto Rican sovereignty since its formation in 1922.

The ruling (and U.S.-backed) People’s Democratic Party, however, gave the passage of the Congressional act a big thumb’s up. In response, the Nationalists, still calling for the recognition of the 1897 Carta de Autonomía, launched a sloppy and bloody revolt in cities across Puerto Rico. The uprising was quickly squashed with a little help from the PDP’s friends to the North, who provided both manpower and military hardware.

Two Puerto Rican nationals living in New York at the time, Griselio Torresola and Oscar Collazo, had a better idea. Down in Washington, with the White House undergoing renovations, Harry Truman had taken up temporary residence in Blair House, the presidential guest house. He was a sitting duck, they figured. Freedom-loving people around the world may have been able to ignore a little three-day skirmish in their homeland, but they wouldn’t be able to ignore the assassination of a U.S. president.

The pair armed themselves and took a train down to Washington. Once they arrived at Blair House, apparently convinced they’d simply be able to kick in the front door and shoot Truman, Torresola and Collazo were surprised to find the place guarded by dozens of secret service agents, city cops, and White House security officers. In the brief gun battle that ensued, Torresola was killed, as was one of the cops. Collazo was taken into custody and later sentenced to death. Two years later in 1952, Truman commuted his sentence to life in prison.

Also in 1952, gleaning that the natives were getting restless, Truman decided it might be wise to appease them by offering a simple vote on the matter. So later that year, the people of Puerto Rico, given the chance to put a free and open democracy into action, went to the polls, where they were freely and openly allowed to choose between the kind of limited autonomy they presently experienced, or complete U.S. control. The fact that “independence” was not among the choices offered was lost on nobody, especially the Nationalists, who for the most part skipped the vote. Those who did vote overwhelmingly chose to stick with limited autonomy.

A radical wing of the Nationalist Party, enraged by the scam of a so-called referendum, began hatching a plan to call attention to the struggles of the Puerto Rican independence movement.

Initially, the four-person team—Lolita Lebrón, Andrés Figueroa Cordero, Rafael Cancel Miranda and Irvin Flores Rodríguez—decided to launch a series of violent attacks around Washington, coinciding with the opening of the Interamerican Conference in Caracas on March first, 1954. As the date approached, however, Lolita Lebrón, self-appointed leader of the group, decided splitting up to try and hit several targets at once around Washington was maybe not the wisest move. They’d get better results if they concentrated their efforts on a single target—namely the U.S. Congress.

So on the morning of March 1st, like Torresola and Collazo before them, Lebrón met the other three at Grand Central Station. Armed with semiautomatic pistols, they boarded a train for Washington. Upon arriving, they marched straight to the Capitol building and found themselves seats at the back of one of the visitors galleries overlooking the House floor.

Down on the floor, Congress was debating whether or not to continue allowing Mexican immigrants to work as migrant laborers on American soil. Upon Lebrón’s signal, a cry of "¡Viva Puerto Rico libre!,” the four stood, unfurled a Puerto Rican flag, pulled their guns and began firing.

After she was arrested, Lebrón insisted she’d only fired hers at the ceiling, saying, "I did not come to kill anyone, I came to die for Puerto Rico.” The other three, however, apparently hadn’t been paying attention during the planning sessions, and began shooting at Congress members. Cordero’s gun jammed, but Miranda more than picked up the slack, firing an estimated 30 rounds into the panicking Congressmen below. Three Democrats and two Republicans were struck, one seriously, but all five survived. All four Nationalists were arrested at the scene.

In June, after a 12-day trial in federal court on attempted murder and weapons charges, the four were found guilty, though Lebrón was found guilty of the lesser charge of assault with a deadly weapon. Although the prosecution had been pushing for the death penalty given the crime involved an attack on the very heart of American democracy, the judge instead handed down consecutive prison terms, fifty years for Lebrón and seventy-five years each for the other three.

In October, they were brought back to court to face further federal conspiracy charges. They were found guilty once again, and the judge tacked another six years onto their sentences. The four were then split up and sent to four different federal prisons.

Two decades after the attack on Congress, the next generation of radical Puerto Rican nationals calling themselves FALN, still fighting for Puerto Rican sovereignty, began a bombing campaign across the U.S.. It’s estimated they detonated over 130 bombs in New York, Chicago, San Francisco and other major cities, most notably the 1975 lunch time bombing of the historic Fraunces Tavern in the Financial District, which killed four Wall Street types.

In 1978, as the bloody, decade-long FALN bombing campaign rolled on, Figueroa Cordero was released from prison after serving 23 years of his 81-year sentence. The next year, then-President Jimmy Carter commuted the sentences of the other three. Some say it was part of a prisoner exchange deal to secure the release of several CIA agents imprisoned in Cuba, while others believe it may have been a direct response to the FALN, who, among other things, had been demanding the release of their revolutionary forbears.

Today, the Puerto Rican Nationalist attack on Congress and the FALN’s deadly decade-long bombing spree remain mostly forgotten. Meanwhile the bumbling rich-kid antics of The Weathermen and the merely bubbling antics of the Symbionese Liberation Army remain firmly entrenched in the American consciousness. The reasons for this are fairly simple and merely part of a long pattern. Groups like The Weathermen and the SLA may not have had any clear plans, may not have been driven by any personal injustices, and may not have accomplished much save for the kidnapping of one rich white girl, but they had great p.r.. They were (mostly) white, they were photogenic, and they didn’t really bother anyone. The four Puerto Rican Nationalists, the FALN and other forgotten groups like the Black Liberation Army were motivated by personal injustices. Their anger was justified, they did some real damage, and that made them a dangerous threat to those in power. They were also, y’know, a bunch of dirty Hispanics and Blacks, so better to just bury the issue. Who cares?

by Jim Knipfel

4 notes · View notes

militant-holy-knight · 5 years ago

Text

Jesuit Suppression Across the Catholic World

In this blogpost, we track how the repression of the Society of Jesus took place in the late 18th-Century.

Brazil

Ground zero for the persecution of the Jesuits. At the time, it was still a Portuguese colony and Jesuits held considerable influence over it as protectors of the Native peoples, with one of these tribes being the Guaraní, who refused to accept Portuguese rule and leave the mission settlements. In 1754, a 3000-strong Spanish and Portuguese military force was dispatched to force the Guaraní to leave the area. The coalition was victorious and over 15,000 Guaranis were either killed or removed, under the protests of the Jesuits which earned the victors’ wrath...

Portugal

The Portuguese Prime-Minister Sebastião de Melo, the Marquis of Pombal, was a Catholic influenced by the Enlightenment who saw the Society of Jesus as holding back Portuguese society with their grip over science and education. The Guarani War is regarded as the start of the animosity between Pombal and the Jesuits for them supporting the Natives against the Portuguese interests. After King Joseph was nearly assassinated by political rivals, the Marquis used the attempted regicide to implicate the Jesuits and use them as an excuse to remove them from Portugal and seize their possessions. The Marquis was granted nearly unlimited power by the king and ruled as an autocratic, but liberal dictator who ordered that all Jesuits should be banished from Portuguese lands and it’s colonies.

France

The French were the second to follow suit, due to already existing tensions between local factions such as the Jansenists and the Gallicans, who objected against the Jesuits’ independence from the crown and answering to an alien power like Rome. The attack on the Jesuits was opened on 17 April 1762 by the Jansenist sympathizer Abbé Chauvelin who denounced the Constitution of the Society of Jesus, which was publicly examined and discussed in a hostile press. The Parlement issued its Extraits des assertions assembled from passages from Jesuit theologians and canonists, in which they were alleged to teach every sort of immorality and error. On 6 August 1762, the final arrêt was proposed to the Parlement by the Advocate General Joly de Fleury, condemning the Society to extinction, but King Louis XV’s intervention brought eight months' delay and in the meantime a compromise was suggested by the Court. If the French Jesuits would separate from the Society headed by the Jesuit General directly under the pope's authority and come under a French vicar, with French customs, as with the Gallican Church, the Crown would still protect them. The French Jesuits, rejecting Gallicanism, refused to consent. As a response, their colleges were closed and they required to renounce their vows under pain of banishment.

Poland

The Jesuits were suppressed one year after the First Partition of Poland with many of the Jesuit order possessions taken over by the Commission of National Education, the world's first Ministry of Education. Ironically, they continued to operate in the areas annexed by Lutheran Prussia and Orthodox Russia.

Austria and Hungary

They went even further than merely suppress the Society of Jesus; Secularization Decree of Holy Roman Joseph II issued on 12 January 1782 for Austria and Hungary banned several monastic orders not involved in teaching or healing and liquidated 140 monasteries (home to 1484 monks and 190 nuns). The banned monastic orders included the Jesuits, Camaldolese, Order of Friars Minor Capuchin, Carmelites, Carthusians, Poor Clares, Order of Saint Benedict, Cistercians, Dominican Order (Order of Preachers), Franciscans, Pauline Fathers and Premonstratensians, and their wealth was taken over by the Religious Fund. His anticlerical and liberal innovations induced Pope Pius VI to pay him a visit in March 1782. Joseph received the Pope politely and presented himself as a good Catholic, but refused to be influenced.

Malta

Malta was at the time a vassal of the Kingdom of Sicily, and Grandmaster Manuel Pinto da Fonseca, himself a Portuguese, followed suit, expelling the Jesuits from the island and seizing their assets. These assets were used in establishing the University of Malta by a decree signed by Pinto on 22 November 1769, with lasting effect on the social and cultural life of Malta. The Church of the Jesuits (in Maltese Knisja tal-Ġiżwiti), one of the oldest churches in Valletta, retains this name up to the present.

Spain

The Spanish Empire was one of the last Catholic states to banish the Jesuits. The Spanish crown had already begun a series of administrative and other changes in their overseas empire, such as reorganizing the viceroyalties, rethinking economic policies, and establishing a military, so that the expulsion of the Jesuits is seen as part of this general trend known generally as the Bourbon Reforms. The aim of the reforms was to curb the increasing autonomy and self-confidence of American-born Spaniards, reassert crown control, and increase revenues. A riot against King Charles III which was viewed as incited by the Jesuits (the riot was caused by an arbitrary law on what people should wear and it’s said one Jesuit actually calmed the mob and sent them home) and alarmed the monarch for challenging their authority. Charles III ordered the convening of a special royal commission to draw up a master plan to expel the Jesuits. The commission first met in January 1767. It modeled its plan on the tactics deployed by France's Philip IV against the Knights Templar in 1307 – emphasizing the element of surprise. Charles's adviser Campomanes had written a treatise on the Templars in 1747, which may have informed the implementation of the Jesuit suppression. Secret orders, to be opened at sunrise on April 2, were sent to all provincial viceroys and district military commanders in Spain. Each sealed envelope contained two documents. One was a copy of the original order expelling "all members of the Society of Jesus" from Charles's Spanish domains and confiscating all their goods. The other instructed local officials to surround the Jesuit colleges and residences on the night of April 2, arrest the Jesuits, and arrange their passage to ships awaiting them at various ports. King Carlos' closing sentence read: “If a single Jesuit, even though sick or dying, is still to be found in the area under your command after the embarkation, prepare yourself to face summary execution”.

Mexico

The Jesuits had actively evangelized the Indians on the northern frontier, but their main activity involved educating elite criollo (American-born Spanish) men, many of whom themselves became Jesuits. Of the 678 Jesuits expelled from Mexico, 75% were Mexican-born. In late June 1767, Spanish soldiers removed the Jesuits from their 16 missions and 32 stations in Mexico. No Jesuit, no matter how old or ill, could be excepted from the king's decree. Many died on the trek along the cactus-studded trail to the Gulf Coast port of Veracruz, where ships awaited them to transport them to Italian exile.

There were protests in Mexico at the exile of so many Jesuit members of elite families, but the Jesuits themselves obeyed the order since they had owned extensive landed estates in Mexico – which supported both their evangelization of indigenous peoples and their education mission to criollo elites – the properties became a source of wealth for the crown. The crown auctioned them off, benefiting the treasury, and their criollo purchasers gained productive well-run properties. Many criollo families felt outraged at the crown's actions, regarding it as a “despotic act”.

Philippines

The royal decree expelling the Society of Jesus from Spain and its dominions reached Manila on 17 May 1768. Between 1769 and 1771, the Jesuits were transported from the Spanish East Indies to Spain and from there deported to Italy.

Italy

After the suppression of the Jesuits in many European countries and their overseas empires, Pope Clement XIV issued a papal brief on 21 July 1773, in Rome titled: Dominus ac Redemptor Noster. That decree included the following statement.

Having further considered that the said Company of Jesus can no longer produce those abundant fruits... in the present case, we are determining upon the fate of a society classed among the mendicant orders, both by its institute and by its privileges; after a mature deliberation, we do, out of our certain knowledge, and the fullness of our apostolical power, suppress and abolish the said company: we deprive it of all activity whatever... And to this end a member of the regular clergy, recommendable for his prudence and sound morals, shall be chosen to preside over and govern the said houses; so that the name of the Company shall be, and is, for ever extinguished and suppressed.

Aftermath

Ironically, the suppression was challenged across most of the non-Catholic Christian nations like Great Britain, Prussia, the Russian Empire and the United States. Frederick the Great of Prussia refused to allow the papal document of suppression to be distributed in his country and Catherine the Great not only refused to allow the papal document of suppression to be distributed, she openly defended the Jesuits from dissolution and the Jesuit chapter in Belarus received her patronage. While Britain did not suppress the Jesuits after seizing Quebec from France, they halted the immigration of anymore Jesuits.

It was also was a major blow to Catholic education across Europe, with nearly 1000 secondary schools and seminaries shut down. Their lands, building and endowments were confiscated; their teachers scattered. Although Jesuit education had become old fashioned in Poland and other areas, it was the main educational support network for Catholic intellectuals, senior clergy and prominent families. Governments tried in vain to replace all those schools, but there were far too few non-clerical teachers who were suitable. This also had an negative effect on the colonies, which saw native populations declining even more rapidly without their protectors. The Jesuit order was restored by the pope in 1814 following the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars, and flourished in terms of rebuilding schools and educational institutions but it never regained its enormous power in the political realm.