#artem Anufriev

[anyapro228]

Academian maniacs 🤢

[sugarytearss]

Bday boy!

[abusedwh0re]

Artyoms prison description——————

—ANUFRIEV

Artem Alexandrovich

Born on 04.10.1992

—Convicted: by the Irkutsk Regional Court under Art. 282.1 part 1, 105 part 2 c. A.V.D.J 30 part 3, 105 part 2 p.A.V.J.D. 158 part 4.A UKRF.

Start of term: 02.04.2013

End of term: PLS (basically life imprisonment)

—As part of an organized group, he committed 6 murders, including a minor, and 8 attempted murders.

Prone to:

TO ESCAPE

ATTACK

SUICIDE

HOSTAGE-TAKING

MUTILATION

[liver-f4ilure]

Academy Maniacs Article Translated

NOTE: I may have missed a part but this is the whole article.

———

ISSUES: KONKURENTl calendar dated January 28, 2013

"Good-natured boy."

The defendant in the case of "hammer throwers" asked for freedom

Author: ANGELINA SALOMATOVA

The Irkutsk Regional Court received the criminal case against Artyom Anufriev and Nikita Lytkin, who, according to the investigators' version, were operating in Irkutsk Akademgorodok from the fall of 2010 to the spring of 2011, killing six people and attempting to kill eight others, on August 13 last year. According to the Code of Criminal Procedure, the term of detention of the defendants, who have been in Irkutsk SIZO-1 since their arrest on April 5 last year, expires six months after the case is filed with the court, on February 13.

However, according to the court, by that time the case cannot be considered on its merits: it took the prosecution six months just to announce the evidence collected in 49 volumes. At the hearing on Wednesday, January 23, the lawyers started presenting evidence, having summoned the first witnesses and experts to the court. Also ahead is the debate of the parties and the final decision. In this regard, the judge put the issue of extending the period of detention on the table. The defendants, who have already been behind bars for almost two years, as it turned out, are not averse to being free. After a short break in the session, which took Artyom Anufriev to communicate with his lawyers, he asked the court to change the measure of restraint to a custodial release.

"All the fears of the investigation about my being on the outside are groundless. I will not be able to influence the course of the investigation in any way, I will not be able to put pressure on witnesses, I will not be able to destroy evidence either. I have places of study, work, residence, at least I had them. I ask to appoint a measure of restraint not involving imprisonment," said Anufriev. The lawyer supported the position of the defendant: "He is socially adapted, as he has a mother, with whom he lived and can continue to live, he does not intend to hide. In addition, he really can not influence the course of the investigation, as all the evidence is already in court, the judicial investigation is coming to an end".

The mother of Nikita Lytkin did not insist on changing the measure of restraint, leaving the decision "at the discretion of the court", but said that her son had long and deeply repented of the crimes committed and, in her opinion, "is not dangerous to society". Despite the defense's arguments, the court decided to extend the detention for three months, until May 13.

"The defendants are accused of particularly serious crimes against the person, committed over a long period of time. Each of the incriminated acts is punishable by imprisonment for a long period of time, including up to life imprisonment. In selecting a measure of restraint, the court took into account that, being at liberty, they could continue criminal activity and escape from the investigation. These circumstances have not fallen away and have not changed," the judge read out the ruling.

A new stage of the judicial investigation, during which evidence will be presented by the defense side, began at the hearing on Wednesday. Among the first lawyers invited an expert on information systems to the court, with the help of whom they found out the subtleties of data exchange in social networks, in particular "VKontakte", in which, according to the investigation, the defendant Anufriev kept extremist correspondence with acquaintances. According to the expert, the correspondence history stored on the server of the social network could theoretically be changed, which Artem Anufriev himself did not know anything about, and therefore, the information seized from the storage can not be evidence in the case.

—

Artyom Anufriev also denies that he was involved in a vicious correspondence, claiming that he gave the password to his social network page to one of his acquaintances, who left compromising messages on his behalf. The court has yet to sort out the evidence; the unique network IP address from which the defendant accessed the Internet may be used to identify the user of the social network. In addition, Anufriev, who chose the policy of denial of guilt, in his defense stated that in the protocol of on-site testimony, held on April 11, 2011, there is a signature made on his behalf by another person. At the request of the state prosecutor, a handwriting examination was appointed, which was entrusted to the Irkutsk Laboratory of Forensic Expertise.

Recall that at the first stages of the investigation, Artyom Anufriev and Nikita Lytkin fully admitted guilt in committing a series of crimes. However, during the judicial investigation, the first refused to testify and said that he had incriminated himself under torture and threats of investigators "with trouble in the detention center". Since then, the defense lines of Anufriev and Lytkin have been divided. The side of the senior defendant, Anufriev, who is charged with, among other things, involving the minor Lytkin in particularly serious crimes, insists that the defendant could not have been the organizer and ideological inspirer of the extremist community, as the prosecution believes.

In order to prove this, the lawyers called to court a woman who knows Artyom Anufriev "from diapers". The witness, who spoke first on the defense side, said that Artyom Anufriev's mother was a close friend of her own mother and the long family friendship allows her to characterize the defendant. "Artyom is a good-natured boy, polite, I have never heard a bad word from him," the witness said. - He is enthusiastic and capable. In character, soft, kind, driven. They had a boy who was always organizing something - basketball, tennis. Unless you called Artyom and invited him, he wouldn't go. They had a music group; when the organizer left town, the group broke up. Artyom's mother offered to create a new group, but he couldn't because he doesn't have organizational skills.

The witness testimony, according to the defense, should refute the prosecution's thesis that Artyom was the brains and inspiration, while Nikita was the executor. The woman also said that Anufriev's mother did not approve of his friendship with Lytykin. "She believed that this young man does not do anything, badly influences Artyom, interferes with his studies. Always tried to stop their friendship," the witness stated. The court has yet to assess the arguments of the defense. The hearing will continue next week. After reviewing the evidence of both sides, the court will consider possible motions to supplement the judicial investigation, after which the debate of the parties will begin and the judge will make a final decision.

[fufa1945]

Artem Anufriev❤️

[tilekeo388betvip]

Tin club 388: Nhận định soi kèo FK Slutsk vs Slavia Mozyr, 18h00 – 22/03/2020 – Giải VĐQG Belarus

Nhận định – Soi kèo nhà cái giữa FK Slutsk vs Slavia Mozyr, vào lúc 18h00 ngày 22/03/2020, VĐQG Belarus, thông tin Tỷ lệ kèo và Link xem bóng đá trực tiếp bởi SMS Bóng Đá.

Xem thêm: https://388bet.top/Asia/vn/soi-keo.html

Soi kèo châu Á FK Slutsk vs Slavia Mozyr: Chọn FK Slutsk

Dù không có được phong độ tốt, nhưng FK Slutsk lại đang có ưu thế rất lớn khi được thi đấu trên sân nhà, hơn nữa lịch sử đối đầu cũng đang ủng hộ thầy trò HLV Vitali Pavlov.Dẫu vậy, Soi kèo nhà cái hôm nay của SMS Bóng Đá cho rằng Slavia Mozyr cũng không phải là đối thủ dễ chơi đối với đội chủ sân Gorodskoy.

Ở 2 lần gặp nhau trư��c đó giữa 2 đội trận đấu đều kết thúc với 1 kết quả hòa và kịch bản tương tự ở trận đấu tới cũng hoàn toàn có thể sảy ra.

Soi kèo tài xỉu FK Slutsk vs Slavia Mozyr: Chọn xỉu

Do là trận đấu mở màn mùa giải mới của 2 đội nên rất dễ hiểu nếu cả 2 đều thi đấu thận trọng nhằm hướng tới 1 kết quả tốt.

Thực tế cho thấy, trong 8 lần gặp nhau gần nhất của họ thì cũng chỉ mới có duy nhất 1 trận là kết thúc với nhiều hơn 2 bàn thắng được ghi. Bởi vậy khả năng trận đấu có thể nổ tài không nhận được đánh giá cao.

Nhận định bóng đá Giải VĐQG Belarus FK Slutsk vs Slavia Mozyr | 22/03/2020 18:00

Nhận định phong độ FK Slutsk

Vốn là đội bóng có chất lượng chuyên môn khá thấp của giải VĐQG Belarus nên không bất ngờ khi FK Slutsk chỉ có thể hài lòng với 1 vị trí an toàn trên bảng xếp hạng ở mùa giải vừa qua.

Cũng vì vậy thầy trò HLV Vitali Pavlov bước vào mùa giải mới mà cũng không được đặt kỳ vọng quá nhiều, nhưng FK Slutsk sẽ không muốn khởi đầu với 1 thất bại.

Điều này cũng hoàn toàn có cơ sở khi đội bóng của HLV Vitali Pavlov sẽ được trở về thi đấu trên sân nhà và tiếp đón Slavia Mozyr.

Có thể thấy, mùa giải vừa qua các vị khách có được phong độ ổn định hơn và do đó họ cũng được đánh giá cao hơn so với FK Slutsk.

Nhưng rõ ràng việc không thắng sau cả 2 lượt trận, thậm chí FK Slutsk còn thua kém chủ nhà ở thành tích đối đầu 10 lần gần nhất khiến họ khó có hy vọng ca khúc khải hoàn.

Nhận định phong độ Slavia Mozyr

Tuy nhiên, sự tự tin là điều đoàn quân của HLV Mikhail Martinovich đang có được khi họ đã khá dễ dàng có được chiến thắng trước Dnepr Mogilev trong trận đấu vừa qua tại cúp Quốc gia.

Đây được xem là bước chạy đà không thể hoàn hảo hơn cho các cầu thủ Slavia Mozyr trước khi mùa giải mới khởi tranh, bởi vậy họ cũng sẽ không dễ dàng để mất điểm trong trận đấu này.

Lịch sử chạm trán FK Slutsk vs Slavia Mozyr

Dự đoán bóng đá Giải VĐQG Belarus FK Slutsk vs Slavia Mozyr | 22/03/2020 18:00

Nhận định bóng đá từ chuyên gia: 1-1

Đội hình dự kiến FK Slutsk vs Slavia Mozyr

FK Slutsk: Ilya Branovets, Aleksandr Anyukevich, Roman Krivulkin, Pavel Nazarenko, Denis Obrazov, Soslan Takulov, Vitali Trubilo, Marat Buraev, Aleksey Pustozerov, Egor Semenov, Artem Serdyuk.

Slavia Mozyr: Evgeni Ivanenko, Denis Kovalevski, Aleksandr Raevskiy, Yurii Pantia, Gleb Shevchenko, James Kotei, Igor Costrov, Aleksandr Anufriev, Francis Narh, Nikita Melnikov, Dennis Tetteh.