#anti hinduphobia

[shut-up-rabert]

This makes me so so soooo fucking angry I can’t be tamed. These people will fall to any level to make my religion look bad. Fucking shameless.

Now that some of my anger is out, lets get into this:

Shree Laxmi wasn’t given to gods, she isn’t a goddamn cattle animal like Kamdhenu, and the demons and gods respected her wishes as a supposed human being to choose either side. She chose devas, not because she was partial against the asuras, but because a) she’s the universal mother, she knows everything that goes on, including which side has bad intentions and which one will use her powers for the good, and b) she chose to be with her eternal Lover/Husband Shree Narayan, and since he was on the deva’s side (aka the good side), she was with them by default.

The fact that literal demons had more respect for her than our secular writer over here, *sigh*

The elixer was given to gods because it was to restore their powers? Like, you know, the ones that were taken away from them? Why the frick would the lord allow Demons to have elixir when he knows they don’t have any good intents? They are literally evil, and protecting against evil is like god’s whole job ffs🤦🏻‍♀️

Literally no one in Mahabharata except Shree Krishna is purely good, get that through your fucking thick skulls. That’s the entire point, you learn what you do from Ramayan and what not to do from Mahabharat. And the Hidamba Mata’s (aka the Danvi whose name you didn’t bother researching, great work 👍🏼) backstory is never discussed in detail, neither is Ghatotkach. For all you know, the pregnancy could have been hidden from him, atleast that’s what their first meeting shows. So if you plan on demonising sex, you proved no motive here.

“Ohh, Ravan never did anything wrong, bas kidnap hi to kiya tha akeli nari ka.” Is such a sad argument tbh, y’all literally see no issue with kidnapping and terrifying a women over your own sister’s lose character? What a shame. “He never touched her.” Social distancing se kidnap kiya tha kya bhenchod? He never touched her sexually you mean, not because he was a saint of a man, but because he was a verified rapist with a blue check. He had raped his own to be niece in law and was cursed by his nephew that raping another woman would lead to his death. He literally threatened to cook Devi Sita and eat her up if she didn’t submit. Another reason he didn’t touch her was because if he had touched her, It would be Jankiayan instead of Ramayan because she would fucking kill him before you all can blink.

“He humiliated her on more than one occasion” is a very sneaky way to say two occasions so that the number can be inflated, eh?

The first occasion: Calling her names so that she will submit herself to agni out of spite and emerge unharmed, which literally everyone condemned, including the loyal brother Lakshman who rebelled against his own brother (for whose wake he would pick up a sword against everyone , mind you) because he dared disrespect a woman like Maa Sita, and even Hanumanji who’s Shri Ram’s biggest, and I mean biggest devotee. Literally no one stood by Sita’s humiliation, and it was later revealed by Shri Ram that the act was staged by the him so that she can have an excuse to perform agni pravesh so that no lecherous person would dare point a finger at her in future. Even the shlokas say he did it so that no one would suspect his wife’s character. And before you say Shri Ram was “saving face”, one of his plus points as mentioned is that he doesn’t lie throughout the entire story, so think again. Y’all really think he spent the entire story worrying for her safety only to insult her in the end?

You think Seeta would have anyone humiliate her once and give them a chance for a second humiliation? Ohhh you dead wrong!

Second occasion: Shree Raghuvar sending Maa Sita to exile, which is a very infamously known interpolation denounced by many. So he only “insulted” her once and that too in a staged act. One of the shlokas he uses to coax his peers after agni pariksha is that a woman like her can never be denounced by him, and like I said, he never lies, sooo…… :P

Shree Ram decietfully killed Bali because Bali was a foe who could not be fought face to face? Do you even Know the story of Bali? Do you know he was such a bad guy he literally took his brother’s wife like she was property? Ugh, I can’t.

Guru Drona didn’t accept Eklavya not because he was “Tribal”, but because he had promised his loyalty to the Bharatvansh Clan. Had even Shree Krishna gone to him asking for training, he would have refused. Eklavya’s tribal background was never discussed in this context.

(Also sidenote to my followers but isn’t it funny how despite Eklavya having to lose his thumb Guru Drona’s boon to Arjun wasn’t fulfilled because he still couldn’t surpass Bhagwaan Ramchandra as the greatest bowman? Khaya piya kuchh nahi, paap sar chadhaya barah aana XD)

I mean, God really out to set a limit to hypocrisy now because the more I see these people the more I disagree with Modiji ki Hypocrisy ki seema hai. Agar hai bhi to ye namune kaise long jump krke laanhg rhe h unhe, oof.

[neosprivacc]

Hinduphobia, Harassment, and Death Threats over Shipwars? What has the Naruto Fandom Become?

I'm an SNS shipper myself but I'm uploading a new post to bring to light the actions that have been committed by user @sneezemonster15, a fellow SNS shipper who also happens to be a toxic Sakura anti, Hinata anti, SS anti, and NH anti. I'm not sure why anyone would be okay with this. If you are, you're certainly sneezemonster15 apologists lol.

Receipt of their Hinduphobic behavior (original post here)

Receipts of them sending someone a death threat (original post here and here)

Receipt of them harassing someone (original post here)

@misunderstood-ace @tamelee @sanmathi-sv @adelalovesmadara @sasukebabygirl @twomiddlefingersforthehaters @maoam @zxcvral @ayunami @casavacia34 @luna-22 @destiny-dreamland @fille-de-skroa @sueske @2li2ly2 @zxxalta @dargression @freshplaidbearcroissant @dattebayo8789 @kuroneko-ace @niki0 @elsa5678 @shameless-fujoshi @darkmistressofunknown @yeaxblossom @obsessingovermanythings @miralona963 @suxpxrpl @legendaryphoenixwarrior @sourtigerwolf-blog @narusasudestiel @sasunarualways @cerezatodd @kuhakukage @cheesiestfriste @maha7-3 @horikoshi-secret-ao3-account @naru-bruh @slowpokedragon @amiejesss @ghostlyluminarycloud @cosmicsasukes @shileyn-nea @isabeldc @wsutal @froggie-bolt @ghostlyluminarycloud @sasukeflavor @b1tterbae-x @elliotmap95 @sourtigerwolf-blog

[im-365-so-stressed]

i am living in india for the first time since 2014 and i have never been more confused. bro wtf is a hinduphobia? why do hindus want to victimise themselves so bad?? i hate twitter here

[curtwilde]

In India, just a week before Eid

- The houses of 15 Muslim families were demolished over alleged consumption of beef

- Two muslim men were beated and tortured to death over alleged cow smuggling.

- A mob brutally attacked muslims over transporting cattle for consumption. They also attacked a madrassa, Muslim owned shops, and even a hospital where patients were being treated.

[bottomramen]

It's been so fun blocking blogs that are crying "hinduphobia" on here. I'm glad y'all learnt how to pretend to be the victim and cry wolf all the time.

But it has been simultaneously exhausting and I'm fucking done with these assholes as well. Nobody is out to get you. But the people you're putting in power sure are trying to get others killed. Hindutva is a dirty word because of people like you.

[insertsacoolname]

For People who are still crying about Ram mandir

This is the pic of mosque that is going to be built on parcel land which will be almost 22 km away from Ram mandir.

The mosque will be named "Masjid Muhammed bin Abdullah", after Prophet Muhammad. It is likely to take three-four years to complete. And from what I've researched it's construction has already started (u can look up to its Wikipedia page).

All I want to say is that please stop now. Enough is enough.

[moidloverxoxo]

I was on the hindublr side of tumblr yesterday. Apparently, a radfem is now going after hinduism by interpreting metaphors and stories from their books incorrectly. When asked to desist, she continued to keep spitting vitriol towards them, and refused to learn. the tags in her post by people who reblogged it were horrific.

hinduism from what i have heard is a fairly equal religion, and most things are explained by culture.

this is what radfems do - twist the truth and spread hate.

This actually angers me quite a bit. As I am a hindu myself and yeah you're right. It is an equal religion.

[sillyguy-supreme]

the way sanghis will cry hinduphobia at any criticism of the indian government but have nothing to say commodification and bastardization of hinduism and hindu spiritualism in the west. like you guys only bring up hinduphobia to suck narendra modi’s toes and silence anyone who doesn’t agree with you.

[queen-of-wisdom]

Just a reminder

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include black people.

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include African people.

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include middle, east, south and south east Asian people.

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include middle eastern people

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include native people all over the world.

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include Jewish people.

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include Muslim people.

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include Hindu people.

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include Buddhist people.

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include Pagan people.

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include anyone who believes different.

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include bisexual people.

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include trans* people.

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include aro a.o ace people

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include people who use micro labels.

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include people with kinks.

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include disabled people.

Your activism is worthless if it doesn't include mental ill people.

Your activism is worthless if you exclude the "bad people" of a minority group.

Your activism is worthless if you exclude people who are "cringe" or do it "wrong".

Your activism is worthless if you exclude anyone for things that don't hurt anyone.

[neosprivacc]

Yes and I don't care because I know what I want, why I do it, and I will not stop until I'm satisfied. I'm pretty sure you're talking about user @sneezemonster15, right?

PS. I answer here because nobody will understand what I'm talking about if I answer where I got this ask from

@misunderstood-ace @tamelee @sanmathi-sv @adelalovesmadara @sasukebabygirl @twomiddlefingersforthehaters @maoam @zxcvral @ayunami @casavacia34 @luna-22 @destiny-dreamland @fille-de-skroa @sueske @2li2ly2 @zxxalta @dargression @freshplaidbearcroissant @dattebayo8789 @kuroneko-ace @niki0 @elsa5678 @shameless-fujoshi @darkmistressofunknown @yeaxblossom @obsessingovermanythings @miralona963 @suxpxrpl @legendaryphoenixwarrior @sourtigerwolf-blog @narusasudestiel @sasunarualways @cerezatodd @kuhakukage @cheesiestfriste @maha7-3 @horikoshi-secret-ao3-account @naru-bruh @slowpokedragon @amiejesss @ghostlyluminarycloud @cosmicsasukes @shileyn-nea @isabeldc @wsutal @froggie-bolt @ghostlyluminarycloud @sasukeflavor @b1tterbae-x @elliotmap95

[snekdood]

im not gonna act like its as severe as hindutvas make it out to be but if you deny hinduphobia exists you're just a dumbass i think

[shut-up-rabert]

Talking about the corruption, slavery and extremely orthodox laws of Qatar during the FIFA World Cup is "Islamophobic" but Al Qaeda threatening to destroy Shri Ram Mandir and built their masjid on the top of it again is not Hinduphobic. France having uniform civil code is Islamophobic but Qatar not allowing LGBTQ is cultural diversity hehe.

Talking about the issue of Taliban refuting OIC and not sending girls to universities is Islamophobic. Talking about Palestine using its people as meat shield is Islamophobic. Talking about the conditions of Pakistani, Bangladeshi Hindus and Christians is Islamophobic. Talking about Kashmir genocide is Islamophobic. Talking about the Yezidi girls being brought and sold like commodities is Islamophobic. Talking about Malaysia stopping conversion to other religions is Islamophobic. Talking about not being allowed to dress how you want in Afghanistan is Islamophobic. Talking about the Iran revolution and throwing homosexuals off the roofs is Islamophobic.

Talking about any accountability that a person who happens to have Islamic faith has towards others, including other Muslims who are killed, raped, tortured due to them is Islamophobic.

Trying to shield the perpetrators because they come from a certain religion isn’t going to help. It’ll just bring more focus on the religion. I’ll be lying if I say that the growth of apathetic anti muslim views of far right isn’t a consequential outcome of this.

[metamatar]

check this bullshit out lmao

You guys are bringing me like rotten food, like im a baby vulture or something.

I love how India is not forcibly occupying Kashmir bc its perfectly normal to switch off the internet for years and arrest all democratically elected leaders and dissolve parliament when you're not an ovcupying force. I've never seen anyone claim Hinduism is responsible for the rise of Nazism, only point to how much Savarkar admired Hitler and Mussolini and its a pity that Jewish folk are seeing solidarity with a Hindutva movement that is fundamentally unconcerned about that. Do they know the RSS apes Nazi salutes and aesthetics?

I do love the Brahmins don't have any institutional power line and the upper caste/lower caste division is made up by white people stuff, bc it is the most blatant way to be sure this person has no real familiarity with Indian culture or history outside of like propaganda, because like, all Hindu texts enshrine the moral, legal and cultural superiority of Brahminism. Why does Eklavya the archer have this thumb cut off for daring to study archery in the Mahabharata? What does it mean that lower caste children cannot drink or eat at the same tables as upper caste children even in India's best universities exactly? Anti semitism has real roots in the history of Western civilization, from ghettos to the holocaust, permitting its association with the made up logic of Hinduphobia – which doesn't exist in India and outside of India is just plain racism is terrible. Upper caste supremacy is the bread and butter and organizing principle of Indian society for centuries, Hindutva politics dominates every single cultural sphere in India.

I also like that the Israel/Palestine is cast into India/Pakistan despite the fact Pakistan is a soverign nuclear armed state that is rapidly destabilizing at the moment due to US influence that India has very little to do with it. Most Pakistanis are also unaffected by India, in that India does not actually occupy Pakistan and enforce apartheid on its citizens despite right wing fantasies. Pakistan and India gets in standoffs with each other! The most significant amount of Kashmiri organising is for Azad Kashmir. Pakistan occupied Kashmir deserves to be free too.

[krsnaradhika]

If speaking for decolonisation of Hindu temples in India and Hindu cultural renaissance, as well as the welfare of the Jews as they face anti-semitism in every other post I see, is fascist and zionist to you, block me. If the revival of Ram mandir is a matter of mourning and shame because the Babri was deconstructed in the process as it did not have any right to stand there by demolishing the place of worship of the Hindus, do not ever contact me again. I'm not the person you're gonna like and imma tell you one more thing - I have no more fucks to give. You take our land, you give it back. The janmabhoomi cannot be shifted but the mosque could and it has, my dude. So will the Gyanvapi and Shahi Eidgah of Kashi and Mathura respectively, because they were seized from us. Because they belong to our Shiva and Keshava and nobody has the right to tell us otherwise. If speaking against Mughal holocausts and genocides against Hindus offends you in any way and leads you into believing that I'm spreading communal hatred because you have by far assumed that I'm Islamophobic, and that Hinduphobia does not exist in and outside India, go no contact with me. Yeah that's it for now. I might edit this post later as I remember more pseudo-liberal agenda and protests against the Rama temple despite the supreme court favouring it in all ways. Despite all these evidences many of you say that it could have been a hospital or school because hey, we can trash on Hinduism all we like. The place isn't anything else because Parasaran sir said - "Once a temple, always a temple." Suggest all those things for the land granted for the other place of worship, if you dare. Wouldn't say that it's genius or even remotely decent either but do go ahead, y'all like to teach us stuff more than anything else. All this Hinduphobia I see here, fills me with more adrenaline to sprinkle salt on your cuts and burns. Have a good time my lovelies.

[indizombie]

The data on anti-Hindu hate crimes undermine the contention that bigotry against Hindus is on the rise. In a recent article, HfHR co-founder Raju Rajagopal points out that of the 35 groups included in the FBI’s hate crimes database, Hindus were less likely to experience hatred than all but Jehovah’s Witnesses. “Muslims are eight times more likely [to experience hate than Hindus are], Jews are 12 times more likely and Sikhs are 128 times,” Rajagopal wrote. (The HAF see this as evidence of underreporting, which they hope to solve by working with law enforcement and “empowering the Hindu American community to recognize, confront, and report Hinduphobia,” Shukla told Jewish Currents.) HfHR notes on its website that though “Hindus globally face varying levels of discrimination,” the data categorically do not support “the notion of systemic Hinduphobia in the United States.” Truschke agreed that the very concept of Hinduphobia seemed “designed to take individual cases and assert a structural problem.” The goal, Sippy argued, is to “cultivate a narrative of Hindu victimization that is robust enough to justify contemporary atrocities.”

Aparna Gopalan, ‘The Hindu nationalists using the pro-Israel playbook’, Jewish Currents