#and instead having it based soley on risk to society
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Tagging @fierceawakening because it's thoughts regarding mostly the prison abolition argument I've been reading on your page, but not about any specific thread that feels reasonable to reply to.
So personally, I don't really think about this too much because in practice I'd much rather focus on specific achievable harm reductions I can currently fight for, however, I have another complication with prison abolition.
I agree that involuntary confinement is problematic, but I've also seen it work? Like my grandfather went to prison, and he says it saved his life and I believe him. I don't think he should've gone to prison in a just system, what he was convicted on was absurd and not reasonable evidence, and it was a non-violent drug crime, which pretty much everyone in the reform to abolition spectrum agree is bad.
At the same time, my grandfather is likely an undiagnosed autistic man, who struggled intensely with adulthood and prison gave him a structured space to learn how to manage himself.
He was lucky enough to be imprisoned in a place where he was given access to education and life skills, similar to what my dad got when his parents paid for a private rehab facility, which was also a form of involuntary confinement. Both of these men in my life returned from these experiences far better able to handle themselves in the world, they both learned important life skills for caring for themselves, and improved their ability to function in employment.
I don't think prisons currently look like this, I know they don't, and I'm pro-reform because of this. I also think that if a fair system were in place it's likely my grandfather should not have been involuntarily commited. (My father had proved a danger to me so he would be comitted in systems advocated by people more on the reform end of the spectrum.) However, it's hard for me to reconcile the idea that all involuntary confinement is inherently bad and that it's only going to make the individuals life worse no matter what. Because the two people in my life who were involuntarily commited (though both very lucky in what services were offered to them in these institutions) both improved their lives significantly because of it.
#I see a lot of people saying non-abolitionists don't have personal experience with the justice system#so I guess part of this is to say#some of us do#Some of us do have family members who were convicted of non-violent drug offences on a wire tap that has a phrase#that is something he regularly says to this day because it's a normal part of his dialect#but as an immigrant it was misconstrued to be proof of involvement#I mean personally I'm very pro making the justice system fully focused on harm reduction#and completely dissolving the connection between the crime comited and the legnth of confinement#and instead having it based soley on risk to society#But in the short term what I'm focusing on is ensuring felons retain the right to vote#that they have access to education and life skills and medical care especially mental health care while in prison#That crimes that do not pose risk to others like drug use or consenual prostitution are no longer crimes#that methods that do have proof of being only bad like solitary confinement or nutriloaf be stopped#I think it should be a last resort to involuntarily commit someone#but there's a difference between that and it being never helpful if that makes sense#This might not be the best phrased thoughts#they've been sitting in my head a while and I don't think I can say them better even if this way isn't fully what I'm intending
1 note
·
View note