#although id also love to base parts of it from vancouver since id love to go back and visit Explore tagged Tumblr posts

[puppyeared]

is this your card? ♦️♣️♥️♠️ it isnt but you dont wanna hurt his feelings

[frontproofmedia]

DOLO FLICKS: Ranking The Friday The 13th Franchise From Worst to Best (#12-9)

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

By Hector Franco

Follow @MrHector_Franco !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs'); Follow @Frontproofmedia!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');

The views and opinions expressed on this web site are solely those of the original authors and other contributors. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of Frontproof Media, the Frontproofmedia.com staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

Published: October 31, 2020

Freddy Kruger. Michael Myers. Pennywise. Leatherface. 

Jason Voorhees. 

It has been over ten years since the last time fans were able to go to a movie theater to watch a new Friday the 13th film.

 In the 1980s, the Friday the 13th franchise and its star Jason Voorhees were embedded in the pop culture zeitgeist releasing eight films in the decade. 

In this series, we look back at the franchise and rank all 12 films from worst to best based purely on this writer’s opinion. Friday The 13th wasn’t a franchise that I grew up watching, so the level of nostalgia for the films is minimal. 

In this ranking, we will not be including Womp Stomp Films fantastic Friday The 13th fan films, Never Hike Alone and Never Hike In The Snow. If they were included, they would be ranked near the top as their quality is top-notch. 

Let’s get started!

12. JASON GOES TO HELL: THE FINAL FRIDAY

RELEASED: AUGUST 13, 1993

DIRECTOR: ADAM MARCUS

APPROXIMATELY 24 KILLS

New Line Cinema’s first foray with the Friday The 13th franchise turned out to be a bit of a mess. New Line Cinema was able to acquire the distribution rights to the series; however, Paramount was able to keep the score used throughout the films and the usage of the name “Friday The 13th”. 

Jason Goes To Hell used first time director Adam Marcus to lead the franchise into a new direction utilizing the bloodline of Jason Voorhees. 

This film has the least amount of Jason than any other movie in the franchise as he is killed within the first half-hour. His essence or spirit is then transferred from one person to another. 

The score and the way the film is shot are it’s lowest points.  The film resembles one made strictly for late-night television on channels like HBO or Cinemax. 

The Unrated version of the film is the preferred version of the movie allowing for some of the most gruesome kills in the franchise, including impalement via a signpost. 

 Also, the character of Creighton Duke, played by Steven Williams, is one of the most memorable characters in the entire franchise with his over-the-top dialogue. 

The gore and some of the characters don’t make up for most of the film having subpar acting and a convoluted and confusing plot. 

Jason Goes To Hell is likely to remain the movie best known for having a Freddy Kruger cameo in its ending. The film is hard to love even for the franchise’s most dedicated fan base. 

11. FRIDAY THE 13TH PART VIII: JASON TAKES MANHATTAN

RELEASED: JULY 28, 1989

DIRECTOR: ROB HEDDEN

APPROXIMATELY 20 KILLS

The eighth installment in the Friday The 13th franchise suffered from a severe amount of series fatigue. The film incorporated a plethora of new elements to the Jason Voorhees character with varying results. 

Many fans know the movie as the “Jason on a boat” film as most of the film takes place on a cruise ship with numerous recently graduated High School students for Jason to take out. 

Jason Takes Manhattan is the most extended entry in the franchise at a one hour and 40-minute runtime. The film’s pacing drags throughout the film, making the audience feel every minute. 

While many slasher films give the impression of the main antagonist teleporting as they always seem to be right behind, their victim, Jason Takes Manhattan has Jason teleporting in numerous scenes. Also, one of the main characters has visions of Jason as a child. 

Friday The 13th isn’t known for its continuity, and the child version of Jason is shown to be a relatively normal child without any physical deformities. 

The film has two things going for it. The first being an iconic shot of Jason Voorhees in the middle of Times Square in New York, although most of the film’s New York scenes were filmed in Vancouver, Canada. 

And the second being, the rooftop boxing kill where Jason punches the head off of Julius, played by V.C. Dupree, who attempted to fight Jason one on one with no weapons. 

While Jason Takes Manhattan has its fair share of memorable moments, its overlong runtime and often time’s ridiculous plot make it one of the worst entries in the franchise. It’s one of the few Friday The 13th films that can be described as boring. 

10. FRIDAY THE 13TH PART VII: THE NEW BLOOD

RELEASED: MAY 13, 1988

DIRECTOR: JOHN CARL BUECHLER

APPROXIMATELY 16 KILLS

The seventh installment in the franchise is one that could go up in my rankings as the years pass. This is the first Friday The 13th that features fan-favorite Kane Hodder playing the role of Jason. 

Hodder would be the only actor to play Jason more than once throughout the franchise. He was also Jason in Jason Takes Manhattan, Jason Goes to Hell, and Jason X. 

The film is known for being a pseudo-Jason vs. Carrie film as the final girl Tina played by Lar Park-Lincoln, has telekinetic powers. Some of the film’s best highlights feature Tina and Jason battle utilizing Hodder’s background as a stuntman to its full advantage. 

The Motion Picture of Association (MPAA) almost completely ruins the film as many of the kill’s feature cut-away shots taking out a majority of the gore. However, this installment does feature the infamous sleeping bag kill, which has become a fan favorite duplicated in later films in the franchise. 

The film’s low ranking is primarily due to the movie having the worst ending in the entire franchise. Tina conjures the body of her dead father out of Crystal Lake to take Jason down below in the film's climax. 

With a mostly forgettable set of characters, a majority of the kills being compromised, and a wretched ending, The New Blood is one of the most inconsistent entries in the series. 

9. JASON X

RELEASED: APRIL 26, 2002

DIRECTOR: JAMES ISAAC

APPROXIMATELY 25 KILLS

Most of the time, when a horror franchise ventures outside of the planet Earth, it tends to be one of the worst entries. 

Jason-X has the look and feel of a film produced by Syfy, similar to movies like Sharknado filled with soap opera style lighting and cringe-worthy dialogue. 

Set in the future in the year 2455, Jason X takes place in a space ship traveling to Earth 2 after an excavation mission from a group of students on the original Earth who find Jason frozen in a facility. 

While most of the dialogue is cringe-inducing, the characters in the film play up the comedic tone of the film making for a fun viewing experience. 

The highlight of Jason X comes when he is first awakened on the space ship and delivers one of if not the best kill in the entire franchise. He puts his would-be victim’s head into a sink full of liquid nitrogen, freezing the victim’s head, which he then proceeds to smash to pieces. 

Jason X is the lowest-grossing film of the series, coming out at a time when Jason’s standing as a horror icon was diminished. 

The film is a fun viewing experience if you are looking to kill a few hours, but even with there being an uber-version of Jason, Jason X feels like a film with no real identity and doesn’t know what it wants to be. 

(Featured Photo: New Line Cinema/Platinum Dunes)

[rebeccahpedersen]

How Do You Evaluate A Multi-Plex For Investment?

TorontoRealtyBlog

Well first of all, if you’re looking at buying a multiplex for investment – good on you, you’ve clearly done something right!

But believe it or not, there’s serious competition for multiplexes – those properties with 3-or-more dwellings.

Cap rates are down, demand is high, and investors are accepting lower returns in order to get into the market.

Let me outline nine criteria that a would-be investor must consider, at the bare minimum, for any multiplex purchase…

Should I outline these in order?

Sure, I could try.

And by try, I mean that every investor has a different set of criteria, and my #4 might be somebody else’s #7.

Of course, you might have a #10, #11, and #12 to add to the list.

And all the while, many of these points go hand-and-hand.

So let me start from the top, where I find most of my clients see it…

–

1) Yield

This should be at the top of the list, no?

Some people would put #2 on the list, but I don’t think that’s smart in this market.

When you buy a stock, what are you looking for?

Well, I suppose that’s a terrible example, since everybody wants to watch the stock go up, up, and up, and they’re looking at the appreciation potential, with the “buy low, sell high” mentality.

But in the good ole days, investors were looking for dividends!

How much is the stock paying you to own it?  You’re a shareholder; you own a portion of the company, so how much of the company’s profit are you receiving?

Times have changed, both in terms of the stock market, and the real estate market.

Ask the man on the street, and he’s looking to buy a stock for $10, and sell it for $15.  But ask the pension funds, and they’re looking for a steady, consistent, predictable, safe return.  They’re the savviest of investors, and they’re looking for a 6% return in perpetuity.

When it comes to investing in real estate, my personal belief is that if you forecast a zero percent appreciation, and the investment makes sense to you based on yield, then the investment will pay out and exceed your expectations.

There’s that old adage in real estate: “When is the best time to sell a piece of real estate?”

The answer: “Never.”

Life happens, situations change, and more often than not, even a long-term investor will need or want to sell.

But on a long-enough time horizon, the appreciation is the icing on the cake, and where the investor makes, by far, the most money.

But at the onset, the short and immediate-term numbers have to make sense.

What does that mean?  What kind of numbers are we looking at in this market?

I see multi-unit dwellings selling at 3% cap rates, and I can’t make sense of it.

When I got into real estate 5.5-6% cap rates on multi-unit properties were the norm.  Over time, those figures have dropped, and it’s up to the investor to decide what works.

2) Appreciation Potential

I suppose the “yield” section was just the preamble for some people.

Every time I talk about yield, and give the example of the dividend-paying-stock, people tell me, “This isn’t 1880; you’re not buying paper-shares of the Great Pacific.”

Fair point.  Times change.

But I’m conservative by nature, and when it comes to buying multi-unit dwellings for long-term investing, I would argue until I’m blue in the face that you have to consider appreciation potential after yield.

Over the last few years, it’s been easy to refute my argument.

I’ve told this story before, so you long-time readers might remember it…

Back in 2010, I had an investor-client in from Los Angeles, who was looking at purchasing a couple of 4-5 unit dwellings.

He was primarily concerned with yield, and the financing ability of the properties (which we’ll explore below), and truly believed, despite his desire to buy, that prices in Toronto were likely headed for a dip.

We found a property in Queen West that was perfect, and hit on several of the other points listed below as well.

It was around a 5.25% cap rate at the list price, and although it would be slightly cash-flow negative each month based on his downpayment, he was willing to consider it.

The property didn’t have an “offer night” as is the custom today, but it still received four offers, and sold for $100,000 over the list price.

My client told me, “This makes no sense.  This is simply the greater fool theory; whoever is buying this property, is expecting to sell it to somebody else down the line for more.”

He wasn’t wrong, logically.

But in practice, he was proven tragically incorrect.

That property, listed at $1.2M, that sold for $1.3M, recently sold for over $2M.

Now tell me again – what’s more important: yield or appreciation potential?

And am I naive to say “appreciation is just icing on the cake?”

3) Location

How can you have any list about real estate evaluation criteria without location?

Location is all part and parcel of the overall evaluation.

Some investors would choose a superior location over a better return, and I wouldn’t disagree.

Earlier this year, I sent a client the listing for a turnkey 4-plex in Mimico, with a rare 4.8% cap rate, what I perceived to be below-market rents, and a copy of the inspection – which looked fantastic.

My client responded with a 3-word email: “It’s in Mimico.”

Enough said.

I liked the income, I liked potential for more income, and I loved the condition of the property.  But he would have rather had a property with a 3.5% cap rate, steps to Trinity-Bellwoods, and at the risk of sounding cliche, “To each, their own.”

Toronto is a rapidly-growing city, both in terms of the population and the urban sprawl, but also in the eyes of the world.

For investors thinking long-term, the best appreciation will undoubtedly be found with those properties that are closest to the city centre, as is the case with every world-class city.  But those properties will have substantially lower yields.

It’s up to the buyer to decide where the best value, for he or she, ultimately lays.

4) Condition

Have you ever looked at the “financials” for an income-property listed on MLS?

It’s hilarious.

You’re lucky if you get property taxes, water, and gas.  Sellers and listing agents love to pretend like electricity and insurance don’t exist.  They’ll be really quick to tell you about the $25 per month the property generates in basement coin-laundry, but they’ll n-e-v-e-r detail the overall cost of ongoing maintenance, upkeep, and repairs.

Part of the reason why many Toronto real estate investors have turned toward condos in the past few years (aside from the lower cost) is because of the maintenance of an 80-year-old 4-plex.  You can do the most thorough of home inspections, and find the property is in A++ shape, but you’ll still be opening your wallet for something, every few months.

As with everything else above, the condition of the property has to be taken into consideration with the other criteria.  You might be willing to pay more, and accept a lower yield, for a true “turnkey” income property.  Or you might decide to pay less, do the work yourself, and hope to add value.

Of course, you can always combine this with #5…

5) Market Rents

Just a brief point to make here, but an important one.

Many properties are being sold with tenants attached, who are leasing at rents well below fair market value.

If properties are sold based on capitalization rates, those rates are taking current rents into consideration, and those rents are below FMV, then it goes without saying that the property is under-valued.

Yes, it can be difficult to get a tenant out so you can raise the rent, and it’s going to become tougher thanks to the Ontario Fair Housing Plan.  But tenants don’t stay forever.

And if you have a property that needs work and has below market rents, when the tenants vacate, you can put work into the property to increase the rents, and add value at the same time.

6) Size & Scope

What do you for a living?

What’s your personal life like?

Tell me about your family…

Now tell me if you would be able to manage a 5-unit property that’s a 45-minute drive in traffic, with whatever knowledge, skill, and capability you currently possess.

Buying a 5-plex is one thing, but managing it is another.

There’s the ongoing maintenance and upkeep, the supervising of tenants, the collection (and chasing…) of rents, and the search for new tenants.

Savvy investors know how to make the property, and the tenants, work for them.  Many landlords will offer a tenant a nominal sum (start with the basement tenant and $30…) to take out the garbage every week.  Many landlords will “allow” the tenants to paint, provided it’s in a neutral colour, and done well.  I put “allow” in quotes, of course, because it’s value-add for the landlord to have a fresh coat of paint, and yet many tenants believe it’s a privilege.

Some investors do this full time – they buy, manage, and maintain multi-unit dwellings.  They have the time, and the experience, to do so.

Other investors have no clue what they’re doing, and they either know that in advance, or find out very quickly!

The fee to manage a property varies drastically, but you’re looking at 5% of gross rents as a starter.  If you can’t handle the size and scope of the property, then factor that cost into your initial financial analysis.

7) Ability To Finance

There’s no hard-and-fast rule on this, but most mortgage brokers will tell you:

4-Units – residential financing

5-Units – there might be a lender out there that will provide residential financing

6-Units – this is commercial, without a doubt

I’ve had clients in the past purchase 5-unit properties and obtain residential financing, but lending criteria changes like the direction of the wind.  More often than not, it depends on which lender you’re talking to, and which underwriter is handling the file.  I’ve seen the 5-unit properties fall into a serious grey area over the years, as some underwriters will lend with residential criteria, and some won’t.

And keep in mind – we’re talking about downpayment and rate!

To buy a 3-plex, you simply need to meet the minimum downpayment criteria (used to be 5%, now it’s 20% for a “second property” subject to some exceptions), and you can obtain a current residential rate, ie. a 5-year, fixed-rate of 2.49%.

When you get into 6-plex and above, you may be required to put down 35%, and the rates could be into the 4-6% range.  Yes, that’s a wide range, but as I said – it depends on your mortgage broker, and which lenders and underwriters they’re talking to.

Going from a 4-unit property, with a 20% down payment, and 2.49% interest rates, to 6-unit property, and a 35% down payment, with a 4.49% interest rate, can be tough to swallow.

But keep in mind, not all “investors” are taking on debt.  Some are buying in cash, some take on debt because it’s cheap (ie. 4.49% is less than their rate of expected return in other investment vehicles), and thus it’s not really a “problem” per se for those looking to buy 6-plexes and up.

You might also argue the yield is better as you climb in the number of units.  Clearly a duplex offers a lower rate of return than a 6-plex, not only because there’s more demand, but because it’s cheaper, easier to afford for the average investor, and thus the price gets bid up.

Ultimately the ability to finance will come into play for an overwhelming majority of investors, and so you might actually start with this.

8) Tenants

Wow, we’re really starting to see how all of these points are intertwined.

The size and scope of the property, combined with the location, combined with the market rents, will ultimately dictate what type of tenants you’ve got.

An investor-client of mine once told me, “Basement apartments aren’t worth the hassle.”

I asked what he meant, and he said, “They’re not worth the $600 they bring in each month.”

Now, this was a long time ago, hence the $600 figure.  Maybe the hassle has been lessened over the years as rents have increased.

But he elaborated in saying, “Ask yourself – what kind of person rents a sh!tty basement apartment for $600 per month?  The lowest common denominator of society, that THAT is now one of my partners in my financial endeavor.”

Sensitivities aside, he might not be wrong.

I’m sure some of the most wonderful people in the world have rented basement apartments, but on the whole, the person looking for the absolutely lowest-priced rental in the city does so not out of desire, but out of necessity.

This client went on to tell me that most of the tenants he’s had renting basements have been troublesome, sometimes in terms of their character and how they treat the unit, but primarily in terms of their ability to service the rent.

Personally, I think if you’re an investor running multi-unit dwellings, there’s a learning curve, and you’ll figure out how to deal with tenants – at every rent level.  And with basement apartments going for $800, $900, or $1,000 in the city, who can turn that kind of money down?

Ultimately, the type of property you have, plus the location, will determine what kind of tenants you get.

And if you’re looking at a property that is tenanted, you want to know everything you can about the tenants in place.

I’ve seen some really sharp listing agents put together info packages on the tenants themselves – their income, occupation, FICO scores, duration of tenancy, and frequency of payments.  That goes a long way toward marketing the property to investors.

9) Proximity To Transit

Perhaps this falls into the “location” category, but having already flushed that out, I think this deserves its own point.

Transit in Toronto is just God-awful, as we all know.

And without generalizing too much here, dare I say that many people who rent, also take transit.

The market rent will be affected by the proximity to transit, the yield will be affected by the market rent, and once again, we see how these points are intertwined.

You could suggest that proximity to parks, schools, retail, etc. bear consideration, but I don’t put them anywhere near the level of importance as transit.  This is my generalization – about renters taking transit, and you can disagree if you want to.  But I’m speaking from experience, with what my clients see out there.

–

You’re probably looking for a point #10, but this list isn’t meant to be well-rounded; it’s meant to point out the most important criteria when evaluating a multiplex for investment.

Somewhere within these points lays a happy medium for the investor.

And as we know, every investor is different.

The post How Do You Evaluate A Multi-Plex For Investment? appeared first on Toronto Real Estate Property Sales & Investments | Toronto Realty Blog by David Fleming.

Originated from http://ift.tt/2slZ4bE

[rebeccahpedersen]

How Do You Evaluate A Multi-Plex For Investment?

TorontoRealtyBlog

Well first of all, if you’re looking at buying a multiplex for investment – good on you, you’ve clearly done something right!

But believe it or not, there’s serious competition for multiplexes – those properties with 3-or-more dwellings.

Cap rates are down, demand is high, and investors are accepting lower returns in order to get into the market.

Let me outline nine criteria that a would-be investor must consider, at the bare minimum, for any multiplex purchase…

Should I outline these in order?

Sure, I could try.

And by try, I mean that every investor has a different set of criteria, and my #4 might be somebody else’s #7.

Of course, you might have a #10, #11, and #12 to add to the list.

And all the while, many of these points go hand-and-hand.

So let me start from the top, where I find most of my clients see it…

–

1) Yield

This should be at the top of the list, no?

Some people would put #2 on the list, but I don’t think that’s smart in this market.

When you buy a stock, what are you looking for?

Well, I suppose that’s a terrible example, since everybody wants to watch the stock go up, up, and up, and they’re looking at the appreciation potential, with the “buy low, sell high” mentality.

But in the good ole days, investors were looking for dividends!

How much is the stock paying you to own it?  You’re a shareholder; you own a portion of the company, so how much of the company’s profit are you receiving?

Times have changed, both in terms of the stock market, and the real estate market.

Ask the man on the street, and he’s looking to buy a stock for $10, and sell it for $15.  But ask the pension funds, and they’re looking for a steady, consistent, predictable, safe return.  They’re the savviest of investors, and they’re looking for a 6% return in perpetuity.

When it comes to investing in real estate, my personal belief is that if you forecast a zero percent appreciation, and the investment makes sense to you based on yield, then the investment will pay out and exceed your expectations.

There’s that old adage in real estate: “When is the best time to sell a piece of real estate?”

The answer: “Never.”

Life happens, situations change, and more often than not, even a long-term investor will need or want to sell.

But on a long-enough time horizon, the appreciation is the icing on the cake, and where the investor makes, by far, the most money.

But at the onset, the short and immediate-term numbers have to make sense.

What does that mean?  What kind of numbers are we looking at in this market?

I see multi-unit dwellings selling at 3% cap rates, and I can’t make sense of it.

When I got into real estate 5.5-6% cap rates on multi-unit properties were the norm.  Over time, those figures have dropped, and it’s up to the investor to decide what works.

2) Appreciation Potential

I suppose the “yield” section was just the preamble for some people.

Every time I talk about yield, and give the example of the dividend-paying-stock, people tell me, “This isn’t 1880; you’re not buying paper-shares of the Great Pacific.”

Fair point.  Times change.

But I’m conservative by nature, and when it comes to buying multi-unit dwellings for long-term investing, I would argue until I’m blue in the face that you have to consider appreciation potential after yield.

Over the last few years, it’s been easy to refute my argument.

I’ve told this story before, so you long-time readers might remember it…

Back in 2010, I had an investor-client in from Los Angeles, who was looking at purchasing a couple of 4-5 unit dwellings.

He was primarily concerned with yield, and the financing ability of the properties (which we’ll explore below), and truly believed, despite his desire to buy, that prices in Toronto were likely headed for a dip.

We found a property in Queen West that was perfect, and hit on several of the other points listed below as well.

It was around a 5.25% cap rate at the list price, and although it would be slightly cash-flow negative each month based on his downpayment, he was willing to consider it.

The property didn’t have an “offer night” as is the custom today, but it still received four offers, and sold for $100,000 over the list price.

My client told me, “This makes no sense.  This is simply the greater fool theory; whoever is buying this property, is expecting to sell it to somebody else down the line for more.”

He wasn’t wrong, logically.

But in practice, he was proven tragically incorrect.

That property, listed at $1.2M, that sold for $1.3M, recently sold for over $2M.

Now tell me again – what’s more important: yield or appreciation potential?

And am I naive to say “appreciation is just icing on the cake?”

3) Location

How can you have any list about real estate evaluation criteria without location?

Location is all part and parcel of the overall evaluation.

Some investors would choose a superior location over a better return, and I wouldn’t disagree.

Earlier this year, I sent a client the listing for a turnkey 4-plex in Mimico, with a rare 4.8% cap rate, what I perceived to be below-market rents, and a copy of the inspection – which looked fantastic.

My client responded with a 3-word email: “It’s in Mimico.”

Enough said.

I liked the income, I liked potential for more income, and I loved the condition of the property.  But he would have rather had a property with a 3.5% cap rate, steps to Trinity-Bellwoods, and at the risk of sounding cliche, “To each, their own.”

Toronto is a rapidly-growing city, both in terms of the population and the urban sprawl, but also in the eyes of the world.

For investors thinking long-term, the best appreciation will undoubtedly be found with those properties that are closest to the city centre, as is the case with every world-class city.  But those properties will have substantially lower yields.

It’s up to the buyer to decide where the best value, for he or she, ultimately lays.

4) Condition

Have you ever looked at the “financials” for an income-property listed on MLS?

It’s hilarious.

You’re lucky if you get property taxes, water, and gas.  Sellers and listing agents love to pretend like electricity and insurance don’t exist.  They’ll be really quick to tell you about the $25 per month the property generates in basement coin-laundry, but they’ll n-e-v-e-r detail the overall cost of ongoing maintenance, upkeep, and repairs.

Part of the reason why many Toronto real estate investors have turned toward condos in the past few years (aside from the lower cost) is because of the maintenance of an 80-year-old 4-plex.  You can do the most thorough of home inspections, and find the property is in A++ shape, but you’ll still be opening your wallet for something, every few months.

As with everything else above, the condition of the property has to be taken into consideration with the other criteria.  You might be willing to pay more, and accept a lower yield, for a true “turnkey” income property.  Or you might decide to pay less, do the work yourself, and hope to add value.

Of course, you can always combine this with #5…

5) Market Rents

Just a brief point to make here, but an important one.

Many properties are being sold with tenants attached, who are leasing at rents well below fair market value.

If properties are sold based on capitalization rates, those rates are taking current rents into consideration, and those rents are below FMV, then it goes without saying that the property is under-valued.

Yes, it can be difficult to get a tenant out so you can raise the rent, and it’s going to become tougher thanks to the Ontario Fair Housing Plan.  But tenants don’t stay forever.

And if you have a property that needs work and has below market rents, when the tenants vacate, you can put work into the property to increase the rents, and add value at the same time.

6) Size & Scope

What do you for a living?

What’s your personal life like?

Tell me about your family…

Now tell me if you would be able to manage a 5-unit property that’s a 45-minute drive in traffic, with whatever knowledge, skill, and capability you currently possess.

Buying a 5-plex is one thing, but managing it is another.

There’s the ongoing maintenance and upkeep, the supervising of tenants, the collection (and chasing…) of rents, and the search for new tenants.

Savvy investors know how to make the property, and the tenants, work for them.  Many landlords will offer a tenant a nominal sum (start with the basement tenant and $30…) to take out the garbage every week.  Many landlords will “allow” the tenants to paint, provided it’s in a neutral colour, and done well.  I put “allow” in quotes, of course, because it’s value-add for the landlord to have a fresh coat of paint, and yet many tenants believe it’s a privilege.

Some investors do this full time – they buy, manage, and maintain multi-unit dwellings.  They have the time, and the experience, to do so.

Other investors have no clue what they’re doing, and they either know that in advance, or find out very quickly!

The fee to manage a property varies drastically, but you’re looking at 5% of gross rents as a starter.  If you can’t handle the size and scope of the property, then factor that cost into your initial financial analysis.

7) Ability To Finance

There’s no hard-and-fast rule on this, but most mortgage brokers will tell you:

4-Units – residential financing

5-Units – there might be a lender out there that will provide residential financing

6-Units – this is commercial, without a doubt

I’ve had clients in the past purchase 5-unit properties and obtain residential financing, but lending criteria changes like the direction of the wind.  More often than not, it depends on which lender you’re talking to, and which underwriter is handling the file.  I’ve seen the 5-unit properties fall into a serious grey area over the years, as some underwriters will lend with residential criteria, and some won’t.

And keep in mind – we’re talking about downpayment and rate!

To buy a 3-plex, you simply need to meet the minimum downpayment criteria (used to be 5%, now it’s 20% for a “second property” subject to some exceptions), and you can obtain a current residential rate, ie. a 5-year, fixed-rate of 2.49%.

When you get into 6-plex and above, you may be required to put down 35%, and the rates could be into the 4-6% range.  Yes, that’s a wide range, but as I said – it depends on your mortgage broker, and which lenders and underwriters they’re talking to.

Going from a 4-unit property, with a 20% down payment, and 2.49% interest rates, to 6-unit property, and a 35% down payment, with a 4.49% interest rate, can be tough to swallow.

But keep in mind, not all “investors” are taking on debt.  Some are buying in cash, some take on debt because it’s cheap (ie. 4.49% is less than their rate of expected return in other investment vehicles), and thus it’s not really a “problem” per se for those looking to buy 6-plexes and up.

You might also argue the yield is better as you climb in the number of units.  Clearly a duplex offers a lower rate of return than a 6-plex, not only because there’s more demand, but because it’s cheaper, easier to afford for the average investor, and thus the price gets bid up.

Ultimately the ability to finance will come into play for an overwhelming majority of investors, and so you might actually start with this.

8) Tenants

Wow, we’re really starting to see how all of these points are intertwined.

The size and scope of the property, combined with the location, combined with the market rents, will ultimately dictate what type of tenants you’ve got.

An investor-client of mine once told me, “Basement apartments aren’t worth the hassle.”

I asked what he meant, and he said, “They’re not worth the $600 they bring in each month.”

Now, this was a long time ago, hence the $600 figure.  Maybe the hassle has been lessened over the years as rents have increased.

But he elaborated in saying, “Ask yourself – what kind of person rents a sh!tty basement apartment for $600 per month?  The lowest common denominator of society, that THAT is now one of my partners in my financial endeavor.”

Sensitivities aside, he might not be wrong.

I’m sure some of the most wonderful people in the world have rented basement apartments, but on the whole, the person looking for the absolutely lowest-priced rental in the city does so not out of desire, but out of necessity.

This client went on to tell me that most of the tenants he’s had renting basements have been troublesome, sometimes in terms of their character and how they treat the unit, but primarily in terms of their ability to service the rent.

Personally, I think if you’re an investor running multi-unit dwellings, there’s a learning curve, and you’ll figure out how to deal with tenants – at every rent level.  And with basement apartments going for $800, $900, or $1,000 in the city, who can turn that kind of money down?

Ultimately, the type of property you have, plus the location, will determine what kind of tenants you get.

And if you’re looking at a property that is tenanted, you want to know everything you can about the tenants in place.

I’ve seen some really sharp listing agents put together info packages on the tenants themselves – their income, occupation, FICO scores, duration of tenancy, and frequency of payments.  That goes a long way toward marketing the property to investors.

9) Proximity To Transit

Perhaps this falls into the “location” category, but having already flushed that out, I think this deserves its own point.

Transit in Toronto is just God-awful, as we all know.

And without generalizing too much here, dare I say that many people who rent, also take transit.

The market rent will be affected by the proximity to transit, the yield will be affected by the market rent, and once again, we see how these points are intertwined.

You could suggest that proximity to parks, schools, retail, etc. bear consideration, but I don’t put them anywhere near the level of importance as transit.  This is my generalization – about renters taking transit, and you can disagree if you want to.  But I’m speaking from experience, with what my clients see out there.

–

You’re probably looking for a point #10, but this list isn’t meant to be well-rounded; it’s meant to point out the most important criteria when evaluating a multiplex for investment.

Somewhere within these points lays a happy medium for the investor.

And as we know, every investor is different.

The post How Do You Evaluate A Multi-Plex For Investment? appeared first on Toronto Real Estate Property Sales & Investments | Toronto Realty Blog by David Fleming.

Originated from http://ift.tt/2slZ4bE