#also maintagging this one since I think this is important to explain

[the-final-sif]

Hello, sorry to bother if you've already gone over this but I'm not the most tech savvy person, what exactly could metadata from snapchat tell us in this situation?

Ah! No this is actually a totally fair question and something that I should've explained before. I forgot that is not a common term and it can mean a lot of things.

So!! To start off with defining what Metadata is, it's "data about data". This is usually easiest to understand with emails. If I have the following email:

Subject: hello From: hello@arealemail.com To: hello@totallyrealemail.com Body: this is a message, see my attached photo Sent 5/6/1954 Attachment: photo.png

Then the "body" would usually be considered the "data" along with the photo itself, and everything else would be metadata. Who sent the message, who it was sent to, what kind of information it is, links to the attachment, etc. All of that is metadata.

So, in the case we have here, Snapchat is the place where Amanda has alleged sexting occurred and Dream sent her sexual photos/videos. She has not provided and has stated she does not have any evidence of these photos/videos. However, she's narrowed down a very slim window of time (under a month) in which Dream would've needed to send at the very least, photos and video files, to her in order for her claims to be true.

Snapchat does not save the actual data (text, video file, photo file) once the file is deleted by the user, however, Snapchat does still save the relevant metadata for a period after that. Metadata can't tell you what was sent, but it can tell if something was sent.

According to Snapchat, they usually delete metadata after 30 days. However, I've seen a variety of reports on how true that is, so it's possible that metadata from before that period may be accessible. Maybe. I think that accessible snapchat records from January may not be possible, but some stuff might still be there.

If snapchat metadata records could be accessed, it could provided information on stuff like how many messages were sent between the accounts, what kind of messages, etc. If Dream is able to access those earlier records and prove that messages between him and Amanda were sparse (or do not line up with the messages alleged by her), then that would be significant evidence that her allegations are fake.

In order for Amanda to prove her claims, she would need the metadata from January to still be accessible and contain at bare minimum, metadata showing that Dream sent at least one video file and I think a few image files although I can't recall the exact number she claimed. It wouldn't be enough for a criminal trial, since there would be nothing to prove that those files have what she claims they have, but it might provided reasonable doubt in a civil trial. That's assuming it exists in the first place, which we don't know.

In the case of Instagram, they do keep records of unsent messages and can produce them, so in the case of the messages that Amanda removed, Instagram should be able to produce both the data and metadata for those messages. For a civil case, Dream could use that in two ways. First, he would be able to know exactly what messages Amanda deleted (since we know there are at least 3) and add those back in for context. Second, if she deleted those messages right before she made/uploaded her video, then that would show a level of intentional alteration which would hurt her a lot in court.

Anyways, that's basically what we'd see from the metadata in question. What can be accessed/still exists is up in the air, so we'll find out about that eventually with any luck.

[mariaiscrafting]

i saw you talk about “blocking etiquette” in one of your posts and i was wondering if you could briefly explain that? my blog is a baby (i joined in march) so i really don’t know any of the unspoken social rules haha. i feel i should know this before i say anything ever thats dream critical lmao

also saw you have a ton of asks so feel free to answer or not there’s no obligation ! take care of urself it seems like a lot to handle rn

I'd like to preface this by disclaiming that I've been on Tumblr since 2014, so I think I have a good sense of blocking etiquette as it's evolved with Tumblr culture, but I might still be presumptuous/wrong about some things.

Anyways. So, on Tumblr, there's generally always been a "block first, ask questions later" mentality. No matter the fandom, people kinda just unfollow or block people at will because Tumblr's algorithm is so shit at recommending things for people that unfollowing/blocking are really the primary ways to tailor what you don't want to see. So, if you frequent a search term/tag search, like "dream smp," you'd likely block someone who posts things frequently to that tag, but whose content you dislike. Blocking is, obviously, still used as a means to stop interacting with just plain assholes, as it is on every social media site. But more times than not, Tumblr users block blogs for neutral reasons related to how they want to tailor their social media experience, rather than a personal vendetta against someone.

Frankly, from my perspective, this was the main use of block lists back in the day. They weren't so much ways to truly hate on anyone's blog since anyone deemed a true asshole would likely spur a reporting campaign against them, rather than an addition to a blocklist. No, Tumblr blocklists were almost always so people who frequented certain tags simply... didn't have to put up with some people. If there was a wave of problematic shippers inundating a fandom/character tag, of TERFs inundating trans/feminism tags, or something similar, they would likely be put on a blocklist simply because Tumblr users wanted a comprehensive list of people they might come across, but didn't want to have to see posts from. Along a similar vein, a lot of mcytblr blogs advocate simply blocking people who post imagines in the main mcyt/dream smp tags, rather than harrassing each and every one of them into fixing their tag habits. Like, they're just annoying, really, and this social media site is so big that just blocking the ones who frequent the tag is so much easier than anything else.

One notable difference about Tumblr blocking as compared to Twitter blocking is the malintent behind Twitter blocking. Twitter fandom subtwts will advocate for blocking someone particularly if they're being cancelled/a Twitter user simply dislikes them enough. In addition, I've seen more than one Twitter user unironically say that they block people who unfollow them, as if following/unfollowing them were a personal affront, and blocking people were some component of this social game that reeks of cliqueness and high school levels of maturity.

That isn't to say that Tumblr blocking etiquette doesn't have pitfalls, because it has many. The main one I've noticed is that, especially in smaller fandom spaces, someone who's considered problematic might be enmassed blocked by lots of users in that fandom, and effectively be shut out of that fandom. If they're put onto a blocklist, a problematic post is circulated enough, or they're blocked by enough "big blogs" in the fandom, these users can be kept from reblogging, liking, or sending asks to a large part of the fandom they participate in. Vague posting doesn't really get you anywhere on Tumblr because of how insular each blog is, as opposed to Twitter, where screenshotting someone's profile who's blocked you and/or complaining very obviously about someone blocking you without naming them is commonplace and can be easily spread throughout a subtwt. This means Tumblr blogs who were mass blocked end up reaching much less members of their fandom, cannot really stand up for themselves in the face of mass blocking unless they're infamous enough for people to recognize their name, or participate in the discourse that promoted their blocking in the first place. While I haven't really experienced this, all of this is taken from what I've observed mutuals and recognizable blogs going through over the years.

Another note is that this website is kinda fucked, coding-wise. We all know this. This means that there are a million holes in the blocking system that make it even more annoying to navigate when people have blocked you, and that ends up getting more people blocked than maybe should be.

First of all, those imagine blogs aren't just posting in the main tags for shits and giggles, or to be cumbersome and clutter the main tags. They're doing it because Tumblr is dying, and even in a fandom as big as mcytblr, it's almost impossible to boost/promote your original content. The Tumblr algorithm sucks at spreading awareness about popular posts, more and more Twitter refugees means less and less people who fucking reblog > liking posts, and basically the only way posts can blow up anymore is by being found through a tag that is trending or frequently browsed through the "most recent" setting. This includes dream smp and many smp character names, so obviously imagine blogs are going to take advantage of this and maintag. It's the reason mcytblr constantly tags "m*necraft" despite being told off, time and time again, for doing so by mineblr. And it's the reason I've likely been blocked by many people- because I had to make the decision between spreading awareness of a post that took a lot of effort and that I thought was important enough to main tag despite being critical/negative, or keeping mcytblr happy by not cluttering their bias's tag with a crit post. Sure, some of mcytblr likely blocked me because they thought I was annoying/disagree with me, and that's fine. But I'm sure many blocked me for the same reason I block imagine blogs and mineblr blocks dream smp stans- because they wanted to peruse their fave's tags, and they simply blocked a random blog that posted something they didn't like, without really thinking much of it.

Second of all, side blogs kinda fuck up how blocking works. It's annoying as hell to see a post you really like in the main tag/search, only to find that the person blocked you upon trying to reblog. Because of sideblogs, people will oftentimes block a sideblog because it's that user's fandom blog, without blocking their main, so the user is left kinda seeing their stuff time and time again, without being able to interact with it.

Speaking of how fucky the code is because of the blogging system, reblogs make it even worse. Most social media sites simply make it so a blocked user cannot see another user's profile, posts and all. But Tumblr not only allows this, it kinda fucks up the search function by sometimes allowing people you've blocked/who've blocked you to show up in main tag searches, it didn't take into account the fact that you can still see an OP's post when someone else reblogs it, and Tumblr didn't think to just fucking fix all these holes and just wholly omit someone's posts if they've blocked you, or you've blocked them. So, despite blocking people, you can still be logged in and see all their shit, and they can see yours. It's kind of annoying as fuck.