#all this shit from the ''get over being clenched abt pansexuality'' to ''aromantics i 'love' you XD'' is Good For Everyone

[unproduciblesmackdown]

polyamory requiring whatever's considered "romance" to not be defined by exclusivity; relationship anarchy (as, like any political sense of anarchy, anti hierarchy rather than "no rules") requiring relationships of any kind to not be defined by hierarchy just like the parenthetical says, e.g. a "romantic" relationship couldn't be defined by "[nonromantic relationship/s] is lesser / beneath this one" & "[romantic relationship] is More Than / above others';" lovequeer perspex challenging any Emotional definition of what supposedly determines "romance" such that any of those feelings are not prescriptively associated with that definition; loveless perspex challenging any Emotional definition of any kind of relationships, being "human," of emotions themselves, where people can't prescriptively ascribe any emotions as "love" of any "kind" and this all inherently asks how social support and existing and navigating the world is supposed to be determined by how individuals personally Feel about other individuals rather than people recognized as people and an approach based on that in & of itself as enough to know they aren't intrinsically less deserving than the people You may know & love........Hell Yes