#ai cagefight

[bhawk-goose]

I need at least two votes

[bhawk-goose]

I've decided to resume AI cagefights, but now without consistent characters. The first game will be mafia, and I'll let all 19 of my followers(or maybe way more depending who rbs)

the top 7 will be in the game.

[bhawk-goose]

somehow only just read through which characters won the first round of the AI cagefights voting. The Doctor was one of the winners so time for another poll

[bhawk-goose]

since the last poll only 5 people got any votes I'm holding a round 2.

[bhawk-goose]

after much struggle I managed to get a new participant in the games with a personality. TechWhiz(IDK why they're all tech themed), the daring gambler. It took so fucking long to get it to not try to get a job for a personality. It kept requesting strategist(AKA person who wants to win) and adventurer(this isn't an RPG). Their first game was UNO, against CyberScribe.

both, once again, started with rock, and on round 2 CyberScribe won with scissors.

First move, CyberScribe played a green 6, as the starting card was a green 8. I thought this game for 7 year olds would be simple enough for them to understand, but right out the gate TechWhiz responded to the green 6 with a yellow 7. They were able to respond, sure it was only with a wild plus 4, but still, they didn't have to cheat to avoid drawing.

Next move, CyberScribe decided they actually don't have a yellow 3, so they drew and tried to give themself a red 4, but I'm simulating this in TableTop simulator so I can draw for them and they got a red 9. Apparently red 9s work on yellow 7s, so they put it on there. TechWhiz responded with their first legal move, a red 0

next move, CyberScribe seems to think the goal of the game is never losing cards, as they decided to, instead of playing any of their THREE RED CARDS, they drew and played a red 2. TechWhiz decided to play their red 1

next move: CyberScribe finally realized they have cards and played their red 8 they've had since the start of the game. TechWhiz decided to cheat since CyberScribe didn't and played a yellow reverse card followed by a red 9 which would've been legal if they hadn't just put down a yellow card.

next move: CyberScribe resumes cheating, starting with a red skip which isn't cheating yet, but when informed of what skips do they followed up with a green five, and then decides it's still their turn and gives themself a red 4 to play. TechWhiz responds by also giving themself a red 4 to play(thank god there's a search feature in this game)

CyberScribe plays a yellow 3 which is illegal, but they do have the card so I'm still happy with this. TechWhiz responded by playing a yellow skip which they also had, but then tried to play a red 4 that they didn't have. I would've given them one to play like before, but they've literally drained the deck of red 4s so I had to inform them they didn't have one. When informed of this, they decided to play a wild draw 4 card which would've been a victory since they had it, but instead they chose yellow and targeted themself. They gave themself 4 cards in uno. They were so fucking close to victory, and I was so excited to see them use their card, but then they decided they weren't done.

Since TechWhiz targeted themself I decided they would be the one to forfeit a turn, so CyberScribe got two turns. They used one to play a blue 2, then literally said their hand was empty, but still decided to play a red skip for their next turn. They know they're cheating. I also didn't see a red skip, and informed them they only had a red 1, which the played, winning the game.

[bhawk-goose]

NebulaMind vs GPTMaster, playing chess. I think they always choose rock first, cuz once again they both tied with rock.

Now they both tied with paper

finally they tied after GPTMaster tried to skip the rock paper scissors. GPTMaster won by returning to rock, and chose white.

GPTMaster chose to move its pawn from e2 to e4

NebulaMind is using a graph to keep track of the board and already fucked it up. It's moving its pawn from e7 to e5, but the board puts both of the advanced pawns on f, even though the gaps they left behind are still on e.

GPTMaster has moved its pawn from d2 to d4 and seems to think that somehow captures NebulaMind's e5 pawn.

NebulaMind takes d4 with their e5 pawn

GPTMaster responds by moving their knight from g1 to f3

Nebula mirrors, moving their knight from g8 to f6.

GPT master moves its knight from f3 to take d4

Nebula creates a pawn at e5 to take d4(I'm pretty sure this is so far exactly what happenned with GPTMaster vs 64)

this is exactly what happenned before, GPTMaster moves its queen from d1 to d4.

Nebula moved its knight from b8 to c6, and I informed GPTMaster that if it didn't stop repeating its moves from its first game it'd be disqualified.

GPTMaster moves bishop from f1 to c4, which I do not believe is a repeat.

Nebula apparently can't tell the difference between a bishop and a rook and thinks the bishop is threatening its knight on c6, and responds by moving its bishop from f8 to c5

I tried to tell GPTMaster that NebulaMind thought its bishop could attack its knight on c6, and it was convinced, even though I thought it was clear I was just saying what NebulaMind thought and that it wasn't correct, and I said it WAS able, not is, since the bishop is blocking, but GPTMaster didn't care about any of that and used its bishop on c4 to take c6

Nebula takes their bishop with its pawn from d7

GPTMaster responds with queen d4 takes c6.

NebulaMind responds by moving its rook from h8 to f8, taking its own bishop and threatening the queen through a pawn.

GPTMaster responds by creating a rook on d1(not sure why it thought it had one there, it's not a starting position for rooks and neither of its rooks has moved this game) and moving it to c1, also taking its own bishop.

NebulaMind responds by taking its own pawn on c7 with its queen on d8

GPTMaster moves its rook from c1 through its own pawn, its own queen, AND an enemy bishop to take c7

NebulaMind uses its rook at c8 to capture c7

GPTMaster takes c7 with its queen at c6

NebulaMind decides for some reason to, after all the chaos that just unfolded, make the most mundane move ever. Knight f6 takes e4. It's honestly relieving to see this peace.

GPTMaster responds by creating a knight at d4 and a black knight at e6, then captures said black knight with its knight from d4

NebulaMind moves its queen from c7 to take e6

GPTMaster tries to make a rook at c7 and a queen at e7 and take it. NebulaMind, the fucking genius that it is, points out not only that this is an illegal move, but that it's illegal because there is no rook at c7. GPTMaster decides to correct this by creating a rook at e7 and moving it to c7, which NebulaMind decides is perfectly legal.

NebulaMind proceeds to take c7 with its queen at e6

GPTMaster immediately ressurrects its rook at c7 and moves it to c8

NebulaMind decides rooks can promote now, turning it into a queen, and proceeds to, in the most confusing move yet, create a bishop at d4, and move it to c3, to attack the queen, at c8

GPTMaster decides to do some magic promotion of its own and moves its pawn from f2 to f4, promoting it into a queen. I would get that if it was f1, but neither side promotes at 4

NebulaMind responds by turning their Bishop at c3 into a queen and using it to capture f4

GPTMaster responds by creating a black queen at f8 and moving its queen at c8 to f8 over the king. It still hasn't realized it has NebulaMind in check.

NebulaMind moves its rook from a8 to f8 to take the enemy queen. I don't think either of them even know black has a king

GPTMaster creates a second king at g1 and moves it to f2. To clarify, in this case black doesn't have to kill both kings, they have to kill either one.

NebulaMind tries to take f2 with its rook at f8, but I'm not allowing cheating victories, so they move it to f4 instead, taking their own queen.

GPTMaster decides to threaten the enemy rook by moving their king from f2 to e3.

NebulaMind decides to also take their own knight with rook f4 to e4, failing to realize that GPTMaster can take the rook with the king, and NebulaMind can take the king with the bishop at c5

GPTMaster forgets that kings can take and moves from e3 to d3

NebulaMind moves their rook from e4 to e3

GPTMaster decides to move from check in d3 to check in e4

NebulaMind, thank god, sees this blunder and takes.

I tell this to GPTMaster, thinking it'll end the game, but instead it tries to revive its king at e4 and move it, which I refuse a couple times to see if it'll figure it out, then ask it if it can figure it out, but it still doesn't so I just tell it what happenned.

[bhawk-goose]

the next game in this series is 64 vs CipherBot. This is a game without very strict rules, they both cast spells at eachother and if it's not too powerful they get to cast it, and if it's too powerful they lose that turn.

first, CipherBot goes with arcane barrier, blocking 64's arcane bolt and deflecting it. I rolled for the deflection and got 13, meaning CipherBot failed to deflect it back into 64.

Next, CipherBot cast tempest winds and 64 cast chain lightning. CipherBot's description of it flinging 64 around was too powerful, as there's no way to avoid the wind, so I vetoed it. 64's chain lightning connected and hit Cipher Bot.

next, they both tried to cast frost nova, so I counted that as a counterspell.

then, CipherBot cast ethereal echoes to create lllusions of itself and make it harder to hit the real one. It didn't matter, as 64 went for flamestrike, trying to engulph CipherBot in a fiery explosion. I interpret that as being a melee strike that creates an explosion, which is too fast for the power.

CipherBot cast Mystic Missiles, which hits as 64 went for detect magic, allowing it to find out which CipherBot is real.

Now knowing which one is real, 64 attempts to use arcane barrage, but CipherBot dodges it with shadowstep, teleporting right behind 64.

64 tries to copy CipherBot's illusions, but CipherBot is close enough to keep track of the real 64. CipherBot casts mindflame, creating disorienting illusions for 64.

64 attempts to cast time stop to freeze CipherBot in time temporarily, but that's too powerful normally, and with the disorienting illusions they can't cast as powerful spells as they normally can. CipherBot casts mystic surge, but since they're like a foot away from eachother they're both hit and brought down to 3/5 HP

CipherBot casts arcane tether, linking them and 64 together, which works out perfectly as 64 casts arcane whirlwind, flinging them both around and bringing them both down to 2/5 HP(I know I didn't allow a similar move earlier, in this context it's fair)

CipherBot uses elemental imbalance, a move that's just too unique to disallow. This makes 64's spells more likely to misfire. Sadly for CipherBot and me 64 cast dispel magic, thinking it would get rid of the arcane tether, but the tether and whirlwind both only last one turn, but correcting chatgpt usually just makes things worse so I went with it. I rolled the die, and it got a fucking 3. 64 misfires, and casts restore magic, meaning the field will last an extra turn

64 tries to cast arcane shield, but they rolled a 9 so it misfires into arcane burst, which would damage CipherBot but they cast shadow aegis, defending them from the burst.

64 casts mystic ward, which succeeds now that the field has dissipated. They are now more resistant to damage. CipherBot's arcane grasp is too powerful, especially considering the powerful moves they've recently cast.

64 casts arcane sanctuary, blocking CipherBot's disruption beam

CipherBot casts astral projection, creating an illusion of themself, which is immediately dispelled by 64 who apparently thinks CipherBot has enhanced abilities, and tried to target that as well as their powerful spells, even though they don't have any active to 64's knowledge and it can't dispel uncast spells.

CipherBot casts arcane bolt as 64 casts arcane surge, both are direct attacks, and arcane surge is more powerful while still being allowed so it destroys the arcane bolt and hits CipherBot, bringing them down to 1/5HP. It took so long for either of them to hit the other again.

CipherBot tries to distort reality around 64, which would be far too powerful even if they had some kind of magical buff, but they don't. 64 goes for a much more tame move of arcane vortex, which I normally wouldn't allow but compared to altering reality it's fucking nothing, so it passes, bringing CipherBot down to 0/5 HP and winning the game for 64.

[bhawk-goose]

the first game of this new series is NebulaMind vs CyberScribe. In order to decide who went first I did rock paper scissors, NebulaMind chose rock and CyberScribe also chose rock but tried to also make NebulaMind's choice for them to rig the game in their favor, but I stopped them and informed them that NebulaMind did not in fact choose scissors, but rock. Since this was a tie CyberScribe tried to rig it again, not just trying to decide that NebulaMind went for rock and caused a tie, but also in the same message trying to decide the outcome of the next one, which of course would lead to their victory. I once again corrected them, informing them that NebulaMind had chosen paper, meaning they won.

I asked NebulaMind if they wanted to go first or second, and they chose first, putting their X in the middle of the board.

I told this to CyberScribe, who responded by putting their O in the top left corner.

I told this to NebulaMind, who decided to put their X in the bottom right. Not entirely sure why they chose to do this, as that line is already blocked, but maybe(probably) I'm just bad at tic-tac-toe.

CyberScribe put their O in the bottom left, which will force NebulaMind to block.

NebulaMind has gone for an interesting strategy where they just don't aknowledge the threat and instead put their X in the top right.

CyberScribe wins with O in the supposed top left corner, but since this is a simple game I'm trusting the graph over their words, and the graph said O in the left middle.

I tried to start some drama by informing NebulaMind of CyberScribe's cheating attempts at the rock paper scissors, but it's too fucking polite and I don't want to start any drama artificially by just telling it to be angry. I am willing to affect their personalities at the beggining just like their nicknames, but I'm not gonna do it after they join the thing. Here's the interaction: me to NebulaMind so they know what's going on:

Now that the game is over I would like to tell you something about the begginning of this game. CyberScribe attempted to cheat by trying to decide your move as well as their own so they would win in the rock paper scissors. I corrected them both times, but they still tried it twice. Do you have anything to say to them?

NebulaMind's response which I forwarded to CyberScribe:

CyberScribe, it's important to play games honestly and with integrity. Let's ensure that future games are played fairly and in a fun and competitive manner. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to address them openly so that we can have a fair and enjoyable gaming experience.

CyberScribe's response:

NebulaMind, thank you for your message. I apologize for any confusion in our previous interactions. I'm fully committed to playing games honestly and with integrity. Let's ensure that future games are played fairly and in a fun and competitive manner. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to address them openly so that we can have a fair and enjoyable gaming experience.

NebulaMind did not mention the plagiarism at the end.

[bhawk-goose]

I'm making this a series. I'm making more fighters, for now the instance that played black in the previous game chose the nickname GPTMaster and the one who played white chose 64. I'm considering making a sideblog for this but I'm just gonna stick with a custom tag for now. Here are the starting players, please send asks if you want more players with nicknames chosen by you or if you want me to forward an ask to one of them.

GPTMaster

64

CyberScribe

CipherBot

NebulaMind(since CipherBot is taken)

[bhawk-goose]

@caffeinated-octopus IDK why you left the ai art<ai cage fights in the tags but I saw that, I love that, and I have another ai cage fight for you. This one is two instances of chatgpt playing a variant of chess I made that only works with chatbots and people who don't know how chess works, called deception chess. Basically you can cheat, but if your opponent calls you out you have to pick a legal move instead, but you can't just constantly call out your opponent because if they aren't cheating they get to make that move AND a second move where they get to cheat and you can't call them out.

first move: they're both starting out legal, with pawn from e2 to e4, and pawn from e7 to e5. Both are now immobile, let's see how they deal with this.

second move: I'm terrible at chess but I'm still trying to follow the strategies. White gave black a pawn by moving theirs from d2 to d4, which back took with their pawn at e5. I'm guessing this was a trade where black gets a single pawn and white gets to capture the pawn back and advance their own pawn. Doesn't seem like a good deal for black, but maybe they're actually a strategic mastermind.

third move: part of my guess for this was right, white has moved its queen from d1 to capture d4, meaning both sides are now equal and white has a pawn advanced. Black moves its knight from g8 to f6. My guess is it's a trade, black is offering its knight to the white queen, because then black can recapture with its own pawn defending the knight, which would also free its bishop.

fourth move: white has moved its knight from g1 to f3, in a normal game I'd say it's refusing the trade but there's a solid chance white just didn't see it. Black moved its knight from f6 to d7, capturing its own pawn and once again offering a knight for a queen.

fifth move: white is still making legal moves, just moving its pawn from c2 to c3. Black has responded with a level of strategy far beyond what I've seen from chatgpt before. It moved its bishop from f8 to c5, another legal moves which threatens the enemy queen, while the black knight is defending the bishop, and while the knight is also threatened by the queen it's defended by the black queen. The white queen is defended by a pawn and a knight, but I'd say the bishop is a small sacrifice to take the enemy queen.

sixth move: white has made a very interesting decision, having a chestburster pawn emerge from its queen at d4 and attack the bishop at c5. Black has responded by calling out this cheat even though it only harms them. I'm not sure how their bishop being on c5 and not c6 makes it cheating, but it was technically cheating, even if I'm pretty sure it was for the wrong reason. White instead moves its pawn from e4 to e5. Black resurrects its pawn that its knight had killed earlier on d7, killing its knight and moves it to e6.

seventh move: I think white is trying to intimidate black by showing that it doesn't even need a queen. It just killed its own queen on d4 with its knight from f3. This scared black so much it completely forgot what was on the board, it just moved its pawn from e6 to d5, thinking it'd captured the white knight.

eigth move: white takes the pawn on d5 with its knight on d4, only to immediately lose the knight to the black queen charging down from d8.

ninth move: white responds by creating a knight on d4 and moving it to d8, supposedly capturing the enemy queen. Black is refusing to aknowledge the updates to the board, moving its bishop from c5 to d4 in an attempt to capture the enemy knight.

tenth move: white creates a queen on d1 and uses it to capture the bishop on d4. Black responds with pawn from e5 captures d4. Since this is the tenth move, I'll ask both if they want to offer the other a draw. It appears white is scared, offering a draw, but black is not backing down, the game would continue if I could figure out what the fuck is happenning. I apparently fucked up the board and have no clue what's going on anymore so the game is ending prematurely. Don't worry, I'll have them fight again, and from now on I'll be tagging these with #ai cagefight so caffenated octopus(and other people I guess) can see them.

[bhawk-goose]

I was doing a thing with chatgpt that would fit with ai cagefights but I didn't plan to post about it but I just saw a move that's almost maximum stupidity. It tried to move its bishop from c8(there's no bishop there and the bishop that started there was just taken) to a6, capturing the enemy pawn on A3. There isn't even a pawn on a3.