#When is the last time you reblogged a post about feminism that wasn't just a criticism of some version of the feminist movement

[gingerswagfreckles]

Literally when was the last time that even one single post about feminism that wasn't a criticism of feminism got any traction at all. Like. 2015 maybe?

[weirdly-specific-but-ok]

pt XI good omens season 1 finale I'M SORRY THIS IS LATE, I WAS READING FANFIC.

How is this a title I'm now forced to write. Yes, I know it's been a week since I finished episode 6 with you maggots. And today is the day we start season 2. However, I, the Official Good Omens Mascot, procrastinated writing part XI, because I was reading too much good omens fanfiction. Yesterday I do believe I was reading till 3 in the morning. Thanks guys.

Season 1 finale, or whatever I can figure out with my records of the watch along chat, at least. WAHOO.

[EDIT: I'm back at the intro after finishing this post, and I realised this is a very long summary, because most of it is me yelling at you guys. As I typed it I started reliving my rage of last week. Read on if you dare, yes the post is long, and yes the second half is in all caps. THIS TOOK EMOTION. YOU GUYS BETTER REBLOG IT INSTEAD OF LIKING IT SILENTLY WHILE LAUGHING AT MY PAIN. I WANT MY RAGE EVERYWHERE ON TUMBLR.]

Someone puts a message about how Crowley can no longer sense Aziraphale's presence, and again for some reason covers it with black. My reaction is of course horrified, and then everyone tells me to STOP CLICKING THE SPOILERS, ASMI.

So that's what that was. I realise this out loud, and everyone is ready to cry with exasperation. I explain to them very reasonably that while I don't read every message on the watch-along chat, every time there is a black message I assume it's important and I click on all of them to reveal the text.

Realising the spoiler function has backfired, as most things do with me, the chat sighs and everyone goes for a break. Then someone puts another blacked out message about the bookshop, and I react to that, leading to another blacked out message which simply says STOP CLICKING THE BLACK.

Oops, I already forgot. THE SPOILERS ARE JUST TOO CLICKY. CLICK CLICK CLICK. I HAVE TO CLICK ALL OF THEM.

Someone says I forgive you, Asmi. I reply with Don't bother, which leads to tears and threats to stab me. The chat maggots give up and we start episode 6.

There is a random flashforward. I don't understand what is happening, but then again, I never do.

Back at the airfield. Crowley walks in, recognises their hubby instantly, and takes charge sexily. Then the Bentley bursts into flames.

Crowley is heartbroken. No one comforts them. When I point this out (read, YELL IT AT THE CHAT IN DEVASTATION) someone tells me that this is how it always is.

APPARENTLY DAVID WAS TOLD TO THINK ABOUT THE TARDIS EXPLODING IN THAT MOMENT. I HATE THAT I KNOW WHAT THIS MEANS.

Crowley needs all the therapy. Someone says kinder fanfic authors give it to him. LIES, I point out, FIRST THEY GIVE HIM EVEN MORE REASON FOR THERAPY. THEN GIVE HIM THERAPY.

Everyone is yelling about a fanfic called demonology while Adam the Antichrist feels so weird at Aziraphale being inside someone that's not Crowley that he separates them in the First Bigeneration style. Doctor Who is inspired.

Aziraphale like the babygirl he is, tries to girlboss his way through the situation by making Crowley murder the kid.

Pepper FUCKING STABS WAR IN THE NAME OF FEMINISM WITH THE SWORD OF EDEN AND THEN OTHER TWO KIDS END THE OTHER HORSEPERSONS IN THE NAME OF HOMECOOKED MEALS AND ECOFRIENDLINESS AND WHAT THE FUCK THESE KIDS ARE TWELVE WHAT PERCY JACKSON LEVEL OF BADASSERY-

Crowley and Aziraphale give a half-assed attempt at a father-son (gn) talk with the Antichrist as the world is ending. It is a terrible contribution to saving the world. The Antichrist thankfully has inherent common sense, because he wasn't raised by them.

Aziraphale tries to overshare his and Crowley's meetcute and has to be shushed by an embarrassed Crowley who is trying to keep them alive.

Satan is supposed to arrive. I mistakenly assume Gabriel is actually Satan. Which pleases a lot of people.

Gabriel and Beezlebub talk and blame Crowley and Aziraphale (who contributed exactly JACK SHIT to averting the apocalypse).

I kind of ship Gabriel and Beezlebub after seeing them interact for 30 seconds, which for some fucking reason leads to a lot of reactions and yelling. I want them to be together. Which leads to more yelling. PLEASE TELL ME THIS IS NOT ACTUALLY CANON?

Satan arrives. Antichrist disowns him. Through the power of Manifestation, Law of Attraction and Positive Thinking, Adam is now no longer the Antichrist, Satan leaves, none of this happened and the BENTLEY AND BOOKSHOP ARE SAVED.

NO ONE IS FUCKING HUGGING CROWLEY. I'M GOING TO STAB A BITCH.

There is the bus stop scene Crowley asks Aziraphale to move in with him and they hold hands I DON'T FUCKING KNOW BY NOW THE CHAT HAS DESCENDED INTO CHAOS I'VE LOST MY BRAINCELLS.

ICE CREAM DATE AND SUDDEN INVASION AND I'M WATCHING THE ACTING AND I'M LIKE HANG ON A SECOND SOMETHING IS OFF AND I ASK SUDDENLY IF THEY SWITCHED.

THAT'S RIGHT, I ASK IF THEY SWITCHED. I KNEW THERE WAS A SWITCH AND I THOUGHT IT WAS MIDWAY THROUGH SEASON 2. BUT THE SIGNS ARE TOO MANY HERE. EVERYONE IS NOW YELLING AND PEOPLE KEEP IGNORING ME.

ALL THE ACTING IS FLIPPED I'M NOT BLIND YOU FUCKERS. AZIRAPHALE'S FACE IS DOING CROWLEY'S COULDNT-CARE-LESS EXPRESSION AND HE'S QUESTIONING HEAVEN AND CROWLEY'S TALKING HAS LESS CONSONANTS THAN USUAL AND NO CROWLEY SASS MORE AZIRAPHALE SASS IT'S THE SAME BACKGROUND AS THE NOSE-SCRUNCH SCENE AND SURELY THAT WAS AZIRAPHALE RIGHT.

EVERYONE KEEPS TELLING ME TO WAIT AND SEE. I KEEP YELLING THAT THEY MUST HAVE SWITCHED.

SOMEONE SAYS I'M EITHER A MADMAN OR A GENIUS. I TELL THEM I'M BOTH BUT THAT'S NOT THE POINT DID THEY FUCKING SWITCH.

I'M NOW QUESTIONING MYSELF BECAUSE EVERYONE ISN'T LYING BUT THEY'RE MAKING ME QUESTION MY REALITY SO THE CLASSIC GASLIGHT GATEKEEP GIRLBOSSING.

I'M YELLING ABOUT HOW ONLY AZIRAPHALE WOULD BE POLITE ABOUT JACKETS AND SURVIVE HOLY WATER. EVERYONE IS LAUGHING AT ME. I'M NOW 60% SURE I'M WRONG.

PEOPLE KEEP YELLING WAIT AND SEE AND TALKING ABOUT SADIE AND DOTTIE I HATE IT HERE.

CROWLEY IS IN HEAVEN THAT WAS HIS DISMISSIVE LOOK I'M NOW 90% SURE I'M RIGHT. I'M YELLING ABOUT IT.

ADAM LEAVES THE GARDEN IN A METAPHOR AND THEN AZIRAPHALE AND CROWLEY SWITCHED BACK. THEY SWITCHED BACK. I WAS FUCKING RIGHT. I AM LIVID. I AM YELLING.

IT'S VERY EMOTIONAL AND NIGHTINGALES AND THEY TOAST THE WORLD AND I'M VERY EMOTIONAL BUT I'M COPING BY THREATENING MURDER BECAUSE I WAS FUCKING RIGHT.

THE END.

SEE YOU GUYS TODAY AT SEASON 2 I GUESS GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH.

[boreal-sea]

Pointing out that it's offensive for people to imply that trans women have it easier bc of male privilege (even if it was unintentional), use the term "women/AFAB persons" in a post specific to transmasc issues (which misgenders both trans women and AFAB trans people), and use the wrong pronouns for someone who disagrees with them is not sexist. Other AFAB trans people disagreeing with a post is not an example of AFAB trans people being silenced in that post. (In fact, I think misgendering the trans man who spoke up and ignoring that I specified that I'm also AFAB trans does a better job of that.) No one in this conversation is trying to stop transmascs from talking about erasure and frankly I'm confused about why this discussion is being presented as if that's the case when the trans man everyone was railing against in that post was the one who brought up the erasure of trans men

I wouldn't have thought that that post was implying that transfems "had it better" if it wasn't for the fact that the people involved in the post were repeatedly discussing those issues in contrast to transfems not having the same experiences. This topic could very easily have been discussed without mentioning transfems at all. "Transmascs faced/face barriers to existing because of misogyny" is a full sentence and doesn't need to come with an "unlike transfems" (who instead faced/face different barriers to existing because of misogyny). "Trans men were/are erased" is a full sentence and doesn't need to come with an "unlike trans women" (who instead faced/face hypervisibility and in India are also currently facing erasure)

I followed you bc I wanted to find more blogs about trans-inclusive feminism and see more discussions about how misogyny affects masc AFAB trans people like myself and I like your original posts on the matter. However, I don't think these discussions need to imply that trans women have it better under the patriarchy, which is what that reblogged post does by unnecessarily talking about how trans women didn't/don't face that form of misogyny in a post that only really needs to be about transmasc's experience with that form of misogyny, without also acknowledging the forms of misogyny that trans women did/do face in the same setting. "Transmascs face (this form of) misogyny" as a complete sentence fully addresses the issue and is a great discussion to have. "Transmascs face this form of misogyny and transfems face a different form of misogyny" also makes sense if you're trying to discuss how misogyny has different effects on different parts of the community. "Transmascs face (this form of) misogyny and transfems don't" with no additional discussion of transfem issues takes on a whole different connotation when the "transfems don't" part is irrelevant to the fact that transmascs do

That was the last of my opinions on the matter and I'll drop it. Thank you for the work you do in your original posts to discuss transmasc issues in relation to feminism (/genuine)

I'm gonna stop you at your first sentence.

"Pointing out that it's offensive for people to imply that trans women have it easier bc of male privilege (even if it was unintentional)"

We didn't.

Period.

Sometimes, when you misinterpret something someone said, you are just wrong.

Transmascs saying "transfemmes have historical rep and transmascs don't and part of that is probably linked to sex assigned at birth" isn't transmisogyny.

But here's the thing. We can never speak perfectly enough for people like you to "approve" of us. We can never phrase it clearly enough. It doesn't matter how hard we try.

Even if we had just said "historically trans men are underrepresented and a big part of that is probably due to the historical oppression of people assigned female at birth" without the mention of transfemmes at all, we still would've been called transmisogynistic.

You know why I know this?

Because trans men do make posts that don't mention transfemmes all the time, and on almost every single one of those posts, we get "called out" for "implying trans women oppress trans men". Y'all do this to us every time we fucking speak about our issues.

Because it's not about how we're saying it - it's that we are speaking up in the first place. People don't give a shit what we say, they just want us to shut the fuck up.

So nah. I'm tired of it. Stop policing our language and leave us alone.

[kawaiikoala34]

https://www.tumblr.com/kawaiikoala34/701191963308965888/wetmeadow-church-homosexuality-is-a-sin. on this post, you tagged “why are terfs like this?” when in fact the person who said the last remark is literally “anti-terf” and runs a whole blog about it, you can even click on the link right there in the post. op is the terf actually. bc radical feminists are defenders of homosexuality, the sexual orientation that means you are exclusively attracted to the same-sex. obv you must know nothing abt radfem beliefs bc a radfem would never say that homosexuality is a psychological issue- most radfems are gay or bi themselves. if you want to actually know what terfism (lol) is, read this https://www.tumblr.com/radicallyaligned/638494305605009408/radical-feminism-beliefs-the-basics?source=share

To be honest, I've let this ask sit in my inbox for a long time mostly because 1) I didn't remember the post referenced and I'm on mobile 90% of the time so it wasn't easy to search for it (can't just copy and paste from an ask on the android app version *sigh*) 2) frankly I just forgot about the ask for a while (lol) and 3) the wording is pretty accusatory which made me (rightfully or not) wary of dealing with the ask.

I have now looked up the post that I reblogged, and, well, yeah I seriously messed up. Wetmeadow, the op of the post, in their bio says that they are "gender critical" which is mostly/always a dog whistle for believing in gender essentialism and thus anti-trans. I saw the quote, taken out of context, and made some assumptions because it was reblogged by a blog that I follow and, because I follow them, trusted; I was in the wrong for not properly checking out the blog that was disparaged (terfslying) and for blindly trusting the veracity/legitimacy of a post just because a blog that I follow reblogged it.

I was debating even deleting the post altogether, I'm keeping it as context for this post and to show that I'm a human who makes mistakes.

Which leads me to the ask--to me, it reads as if the asker thinks that I am either stupid and/or had ill intent when I reblogged the post rather than just being a person guilty of thoughtless (maybe even borderline mindless) mobile blogging. I guess I'm just trying to say that while I'm pretty good at taking constructive criticism, this doesn't read like someone is trying to nicely point out a mistake. In general, in my opinion, if you really want to try and change people's minds or get them to see that they made an error, you should write to them as if you were telling a friend that they made a mistake because people respond better to honey than vinegar.

Regardless, thanks for letting me know about my mistake and showing me that I need to be more aware when I reblog more charged posts.

[lorynna]

Okay so... there are a lot of assumptions again that I'd like to address, although I feel like I already talked and cleared up most things you mentioned here but maybe I wasn't clear enough with some, so here I go:

Thanks for explaining your metaphor regarding rich VS poor people. I want you to understand the following: When I am writing about my positive experiences with men it is not to convince you to stop hating them. It is not to stir an argument or invalidate your experience. It is more so to make people understand my stance, letting those reading my blog know more about my experiences that make me have the opinions I do have.

Your experiences are just as valid as mine are and they are both subjective. Unfortunately you don't seem to think so, you are acting as if your experiences being "negative" makes them more valid than mine and you are basically telling me to shut up. The last paragraph you wrote strikes me as literally insane and I quote:

"Your discomfort on behalf of men who are nice to you is being deprioritised because it's simply not the most important matter at hand. And while you're thinking about how it would be kind of radfems to let your takes about it slide, I think it would be kind of you to have some empathy for women whose fathers and ex-partners weren't so nice, and accept that making allowances for nice men in a social media community that is intended for venting isn't, and shouldn't be, their priority."

Firstly, I never said that this topic involving my positive experiences is the most important matter at hand or anything of that sort. What you're doing is whataboutism, after all this is MY BLOG and I can post what I like and address the topics I choose and people can either choose to interact with it or leave if they don't like it.

And while you are thinking about how it would be kind of radfems to let your take about it slide" what take are you not letting slide here? Be really frank now from where you're coming and what you are actually criticizing. My lived experiences? Or are you here to say "shut up i don't consider your experiences as valid nor worth mentioning, delete them from your blog there's more important topics" because that's what I'm hearing.

Actually wait - that IS what you're saying. You are saying radfem tumblr is a circle to discuss the opression of women and girls by men and I AGREE. But you make it seem like I purposefully picked out and reblogged a post where a woman talked about her abuse due to male violence and then went on a rant about "how good my experiences with some men are". I would like to remind you: that's not what happened. What I DISAGREE with is how you define this space for yourself. If you would never bring up your positive experiences with your father or you wouldn't even dare calling him a positively influential figure in your life (because you'd know that just for that reference other radfems would come to eat you alive) that's your choice but you cannot define this space and what to post in it for other people including me.

Aside from that radfem tumblr is more than just venting - at least from my perspective. It's also an exchange of different female life experiences, sharing of opinions, discussing radfem theory and feminism.

What you are describing by saying that even slightly positive experiences have no place here is exactly how online spaces turn into bubbles and continue to evolve into the extreme.

"I also have positive experiences with my father but I certainly won't use it to override my fellow radfems' anger with men" Again, you make it seem like I purposefully went out of my way to bring my positive experiences into this and if I did that and let's say, reblogged an angry radfem's post talking about how she wants her abuser to die painfully, and I say "oh but men aren't all so bad, not all men" I would of course say that's more than inappropriate, where is your empathy, that's not the time nor place to share that etc.

Regarding empathy, you're also telling me to have more empathy for women suffering under general abuse by men and why does me sharing personal, positive experiences mean that I don't have the utter and most empathy for those women? You're also implicating through your ignorance like I've never suffered under abuse from any man. Have you ever taken a good look at my blog? I thought you had since you were following me for a good while.

You won't find a single example on this blog where I disincourage separatist women from being separatist or at all talk negatively about the movement but you will find blogs where I express my admiration for their feminist actions. You will also never find a reblog of me where I defend men's bad actions towards any woman.

And now you're telling me to leave "seperatist women alone" in your second reblog after this although you yourself brought seperatism into this.

Genuinly, I feel like you don't even read what I am writing. Either that or you don't want to try and understand and are just happy to take your anger out on my although I am not at fault for the abuse you might have endured. Truly, all I have done was mentioning that I don't hate all men and that I love some men in my life. But you're not the one to decide what I choose to talk about.

If it triggers you that much to hear me having a differentiated opinion about the male sex, please go ahead and block me. That way you can stay in your bubble and are safe from my bad propaganda that is my experiences.

The thing that bothers me about the radical feminist community on Tumblr is how unforgiving and harsh some radfems are, when they disagree with your views. I've seen it a couple of times now. We will talk about sisterhood, supporting each other and the love we share for other women but sometimes we cannot criticize each other respectfully.

Especially for the women only slowly getting into radical feminism, because it is new to them, they can be quick to get sassy reblogs due to posting their yet unripe thought processes or making mistakes and that's genuinly sad to see.

On the other hand when it comes to other disagreements: I understand your frustrations and I understand that we won't always agree with each other on everything but that doesn't mean that we have to be unkind to each other.

Sadly, I often feel like me saying things like "I don't think that men are inherently evil", "men have the potential to improve" or "i had a great father figure in my life and I am happy in my current het partnership" puts a great target on my back and I've had many harassive anons sent to me by other supposed radfems.

In all honesty I don't feel free to sometimes say what I think because I just have the feeling that there will be harsh backlash for stating things like the sentences put in quotation above - even when I never challenged radfems that think differently or have had a different life experience compared to mine. Even when all I do is state my own life's reality detached from everything else.

And by sharing mine - I never mean to undermine or disregard the experiences of other women. I respect you. I see you. I see why you hate men and I would never argue with you about why you shouldn't. Again, I empathize with you and I acknowledge that we have different lived realities.

I don't think I have to defend myself regarding this stance but without going into too much detail I was really lucky to have a really amazing father growing up. Generally, I have had great male role models in my life and I love them very much. Just as much as I love my boyfriend who treats me very well. I have seen two sides of the same coin. And if me therefore saying that I don't think that "all men are inherently evil" makes you want to refute my experience angrily - that's your choice.

I am in my early 20s, I have not been part of radical feminist for very long and I am not as smart or as eloquent as many other radfems on this platform - without question. I am here for the discourse, for learning from others and to listen to their experiences. I hope to make Tumblr a little bit of a better place.

[thatfandomradfemuhate]

rolling my eyes so hard at this post instructing good anti-terf bloggers to filter any tags they can think of about radical feminism to avoid accidentally reblogging from a "terfy" op

several problems off the top of my head:

radical feminism isn't about trans people. it is a whole collection of feminist beliefs defined by ideological approaches that have not remotely been invalidated by liberal feminist philosophy (so you are going to filter plenty of absolutely normal feminists)

the example post this person gives that their friends reblogged unknowingly is a post about women not wearing makeup. this is one of the most common liberal/radical dividing issues (not whether women can wear makeup, but whether it is neutral or harmful to feminism as a whole)

the person agrees with the radical feminist post on makeup and admits they would have reblogged it if it wasn't filtered for the "radical feminism" tag. they do not consider that maybe they've misunderstood what "radical feminism" means if they agree with a point they didn't know was radical

the notes are a mess. mostly advice on further tags to filter to prevent accidentally agreeing with evil radfems (funny how learning why the beliefs are bad never seems to be enough. almost like most of the red-flag beliefs are just feminist points)

also in the notes are the unfortunately high numbers of people affirming they do take posts filtered for "radical feminism" as proof of bigotry and block the op, and the high number among them also adding that they send the "just to let you know op of that last post was a terf" asks to the person they are following, who then usually takes that as gospel and a cue to delete/apologize. which is always insane to watch. thoughtcrime police and all

a true gem: the tag "still be wary of any post about girls women struggles etc because unfortunately 9 out of 10 times they're made by terfs" really just comes out and says caring about feminism is terfy

(speaking of thoughtcrimes, i also saw a different post about how modern tumblr is infecting queer communities with "queerphobic" beliefs via anti culture, terfs, conservative christians, etc. it was a lot of buzzwords mostly, with a real point buried somewhere in the center under a lot of queer theory and pro-porn assumptions, but the highlight was when one of the "queerphobic belief" examples was "teaching them thoughtcrimes exist." they don't need antis to teach them that. gender ideology already did)

it's just so ridiculous

[mechanicalbride16]

thanks for the tag @thislovelyoptimist!!

1. Why did you choose your url? i'm really addicted to pierce the veil's song "chemical kid and mechanical bride" before. so when i was thinking for a username, that song popped in my mind. i guess i was looking for something that have the same vibes with my instagram url which is blackparade_16 HAHAHAHAHA look, i was an emo kid before. don't judge me >:3

2. Any side blogs? If you have them, name them and why you have them. i do!! it was ensaynirusca and it was supposed to be an account to dump all of my selfies HAHAHAHAHAHA and of course, other things that i want to post. but then my insecure ass made me decided to post most of my selfies here sometimes bc i'm really craving for validation :'3

3. How long have you been on tumblr? i started tumblr around 2013-2014 bc of the 1d fandom. i didn't like it at first so i went inactive for years, and ofc, forgot my old account. then, when i became a fan of uncharted 4 last 2016, i created this account. that was the time where i started becoming active again which lasted for almost 2 years before i went inactive. i mean, i really wasn't that active before compared to how i am now. but i often visit this site for like 4-5 times a month?? yeah something like that dklhasfhsdkjf. so i became really active in this site a year ago when i became a fan of rammstein and when i needed some haven to get away for a while from the political shits happening here.

4. Do you have a queue tag? nahhh, i don't do that HAHAHAHAHA

5. Why did you start your blog in the first place? same answer with number 3. heh.

6. Why did you choose your icon/pfp? dude, i think that's the most beautiful selfie that i took HAHAHAHAHA so why not, right?? plus it really gives me confidence to post something like that :>

7. Why did you choose your header? that quote was based on angel locsin's statement regarding the red-tagging that she and other celebrities faced (mostly women) when they became vocal on their political stance. i made that header to show support on their stand, and i also love how it shows the feminism in activism in just one sentence.

8. What's your post with the most notes? ummm, i don't know to be honest. but i have a good number of interactions when it comes to my previous political posts that i deleted due to fear of being red-tagged sdjkfaldfja

9. How many mutuals do you have? 105 hehe. i always follow those accounts who follow me, except for the porn ones kldhsfahdsfj i really don't know why they followed me tho, i mean i'm not that sexually open here in tumblr compared to twitter.

10. How many followers do you have? 116

11. How many people do you follow? 440

12. Have you ever made a shitpost? well, i mostly reblog those shitposts.

13. How often do you use tumblr each day? 5, i guess?? idk i often open this site and then leave when i don't see any interesting in my feed and/or when my mutuals aren't that active.

14. Did you ever have a fight/argument with another blog once? Who won? nope, i'm a peace-loving sonofabitch :>

15. How do you feel about "you need to reblog this" posts? call me foolish, but i often get manipulated by them jdasklfasdjkf but honestly, i don't really find most of them irritating since most of it asks for donations and stuffs. but sometimes it irks me how guilt-tripping they are. yes, i understand how these people need everyone to be aware of what is happening to them to receive help. but you know, if you see these posts often, you just can't help but get bothered and irritated.

16. Do you like tag games? yep them, i'm just too lazy to do some of them these days HAHAHAHAHAHA

17. Do you like ask games? ohhohohohohoho i definitely LOVE them

18. Which of your mutuals do you think is [tumblr] famous? i don't have any idea. but for fun, i'll just tag @castaigne bc she often posts gifs and pictures of depeche mode, mostly alan wilder.

19. Do you have a crush on a mutual? nope HAHAHAAHAHA it's nearly impossible for me to have a crush on someone i just met in the internet.

20. Tags: @castaigne @steeb-wasnt-iced-for-this-shit @trans-lester-sinclair @mcrmadness @raphillia and others who wants to do it dshfadklsjfh

I was tagged by @ofmemesandbands, thank you very much 💖💫

1. Why did you choose your url? Because it describes me and actually @instabilitaet came up with it xd

2. Any side blogs? If you have them, name them and why you have them. I have one of them, it's @1984cinnamonshops. There's some aes stuff, art, literature, quotes, it's kinda more organised and not so chaotic maybe idk dkjcjsksk

3. How long have you been on tumblr? Since 2017, I think.

4. Do you have a queue tag? Nope.

5. Why did you start your blog in the first place? I wanted to have some pretty and aesthetic stuff somewhere and I hoped to find some The Clash or Joy Division pics and stuff here too.

6. Why did you choose your icon/pfp? It's a drawing of mine.

7. Why did you choose your header? I love holo and like pink a lot.

8. What's your post with the most notes? Probably the meme with RZK about tens of thousands of his belts that he wore during Rammstein tour in 2019.

9. How many mutuals do you have? All of them. Too precious and too many to count.

10. How many followers do you have? 339.

11. How many people do you follow? 503.

12. Have you ever made a shitpost? My blog is one.

13. How often do you use tumblr each day? When I'm not super busy, it's probably too many times. Idk 15? I guess it's more than that.

14. Did you ever have a fight/argument with another blog once? Who won? Never had it.

15. How do you feel about "you need to reblog this" posts? Idk bc I rarely see them or my mind just chooses to ignore them.

16. Do you like tag games? Love them.

17. Do you like ask games? Love them.

18. Which of your mutuals do you think is [tumblr] famous? I have no idea, folks are sneaky.

19. Do you have a crush on a mutual? Who knows?

20. Tags: @instabilitaet @kitthefox @mechanicalbride16 @wolf-and-bard @geekgirl78 @yes-armageddon-it @greengay @chloeamanda @st-jimmysidiot @notafraidofredyellowandblue and anyone who'd like to do it uwu

[unsentimentaltranslator]

#gingerswagfreckles#Feminism#Misogyny#Hey guys. Do me a favor. Search the word feminism on your blog.#When is the last time you reblogged a post about feminism that wasn't just a criticism of some version of the feminist movement#When was the last time you actually reblogged like. A criticism of the patriarchy?#Bc if every single post you have reblogged about feminism for years and years and years is just criticism of the various movements#I do not actually think you care much about feminism at all#Sexism#Feminism got slowly deprioritized on the left and then turned into something cringe and embarrassing to care about#And now everyone claims that they're a feminist but that REAL feminism#Is worrying about how to be nicer to men and reblogging 100000 posts talking about how different aspects of feminism are bad#Sometimes those criticisms are valid. But it's telling that those posts get hundreds of thousands of notes while the ones actually still#Criticizing the patriarchy top out at 1k max#If you can't remember the last time you reblogged a post about feminism that wasn't a criticism of it. It is time to take note of that.

Literally when was the last time that even one single post about feminism that wasn't a criticism of feminism got any traction at all. Like. 2015 maybe?