#VAERS data

[dosesofcommonsense]

[reality-detective]

The VAERS data on all vaccine deaths from 1988 to 2021 reveals that Covid vaccine deaths in 1 year are equivalent to deaths of all other vaccines in 33 years. 🤔

[darkmaga-returns]

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The McCullough Foundation study, authored by epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, and Dr. Peter McCullough, titled, Review of Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify: Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits, was just published in the journal Science, Public Health Policy and the Law:

Abstract: COVID-19 vaccination campaigns around the globe have failed to meet fundamental standards of safety and efficacy, leading to mounting evidence of significant harm. More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, researchers, and concerned citizens, 240 elected government officials, 17 professional public health and physician organizations, 2 State Republican Parties, 17 Republican Party County Committees, and 6 scientific studies from across the world have called for the market withdrawal of COVID-19 vaccines. As of September 6, 2024, the CDC has documented 19,028 deaths in the United States reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) by healthcare professionals or pharmaceutical companies who believe the product is related to the death. The total number of COVID-19 vaccine deaths reported to VAERS (37,544 among all participating countries) have far exceeded the recall limits of past vaccine withdrawals by up to 375,340%. The criteria for an FDA Class I recall, which applies to products with a reasonable probability of causing serious adverse health consequences or death, have been far exceeded. Excess mortality, negative efficacy, widespread DNA contamination, and a lack of demonstrated reduction in transmission, hospitalization, or mortality have undermined the rationale for continued administration. These unified requests for regulatory action underscore substantial shortcomings in data safety monitoring and risk mitigation. Immediate removal of COVID-19 vaccines from the market is essential to prevent further loss of life and ensure next steps are taken for accountability of the harm incurred.

[didanawisgi]

https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/review-of-calls-for-market-removal-of-covid-19-vaccines-intensify-risks-far-outweigh-theoretical-benefits/

Review of Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify: Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits

Abstract

COVID-19 vaccination campaigns around the globe have failed to meet fundamental standards of safety and efficacy, leading to mounting evidence of significant harm. More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, researchers, and concerned citizens, 240 elected government officials, 17 professional public health and physician organizations, 2 State Republican Parties, 17 Republican Party County Committees, and 6 scientific studies from across the world have called for the market withdrawal of COVID-19 vaccines. As of September 6, 2024, the CDC has documented 19,028 deaths in the United States reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) by healthcare professionals or pharmaceutical companies who believe the product is related to the death. The total number of COVID-19 vaccine deaths reported to VAERS (37,544 among all participating countries) have far exceeded the recall limits of past vaccine withdrawals by up to 375,340%. The criteria for an FDA Class I recall, which applies to products with a reasonable probability of causing serious adverse health consequences or death, have been far exceeded. Excess mortality, negative efficacy, widespread DNA contamination, and a lack of demonstrated reduction in transmission, hospitalization, or mortality have undermined the rationale for continued administration. These unified requests for regulatory action underscore substantial shortcomings in data safety monitoring and risk mitigation. Immediate removal of COVID-19 vaccines from the market is essential to prevent further loss of life and ensure next steps are taken for accountability of the harm incurred.

[starseedpatriot]

“The most shocking finding of the investigation was that 100% of Covid-19 vaccine deaths reported to VAERS with identified lot numbers had been caused by just 5% of the batches produced. But the deeply troubling findings don’t end there, because we decided to conduct further analysis of the VAERS data on the Covid-19 vaccines, and we’ve discovered that the majority of the deadliest batches were clearly sent to Republican-controlled red states across the USA.”

[darkeagleruins]

VAERS data on all vaccine deaths from 1988 to 2021. 💉

COVID vaccine deaths for one year are equivalent to all other vaccine deaths for 33 years ☠️☠️

[vomitdodger]

Great article on the statistical summary of VAERS and the lies to say “nothing to see here. Graph from the article:

[hybridmindthoughtsreloaded]

VAERS data on all vaccine deaths from 1988 to 2021.

Covid vaccine deaths in 1 year are equivalent to deaths of all other vaccines in 33 years.

[gusty-wind]

Sen. Ron Johnson (R) says a review of VAERS data shows CoViD-2019 “vaccines” 55x deadlier than flu shots 💉

Review Shows COVID-19 Vaccines ‘Significantly’ More Deadly Than Flu Shots: Sen. Ron Johnson

A study conducted by his staff estimates COVID-19 shots to be roughly 55 times deadlier than the flu vaccine.

[sighphi]

VAERS data made transparent

[reality-detective]

VAERS data on all vaccine deaths from 1988 to 2021 and Covid vaccine deaths in 1 year are equivalent to the deaths of all other vaccines in 33 years. 🤔

[darkmaga-returns]

There will be much more to this story as it unfolds but the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) has finally obtained the VAERS safety information produced by the FDA themselves.

During the pandemic, FDA conducted analyses of COVID-19 vaccine adverse events and tried to hide the results from the public. After two years of FOIA requests and lawsuits, FDA finally produced a portion of its “Empirical Bayesian (EB) data mining” reports. This type of analysis was designed to detect COVID-19 vaccine safety signals using VAERS reports. The data should be very revealing as far as what issues FDA was seeing during the vaccine rollout—especially given the agency has kept this data secret for years. This is the first time this critical data has been released to the public. An initial review of the records produced has revealed a long list of adverse events that far surpassed FDA’s “standard alert threshold”—meaning, there is (or should have been) great concern on the part of federal health authorities who were privy to this data. As just one example, ICAN discovered that “heavy menstrual bleeding” and “menstruation irregular” began showing up on the reports as early as April 2021!

I have only done a cursory review of the reported signals but what immediately caught my attention is that by 4th March, 2022, by their own metrics, all three US “vaccines” appear to be signalling serious adverse events, including

death (Janssen)

exposure via breast milk (Moderna, Pfizer)

suspected COVID-19 (Janssen); and

ineffectiveness (Pfizer).

If a product is ineffective, surely everything else is moot?! If that “ineffective” product is fatal in some cases, well…

No wonder they tried so shared to stop it being “shared more broadly”?

[trawpius]

I love when anti-vaxxers use VAERS data to justify their claims. That’s like taking advice from iwaspoisoned.com