#Top Advocate in India

[advocateashishvenaikseo]

top Advocate in India

Advocate Ashish Venaik is the top Advocate in India. He solves any case individually. You can hire the best lawyer Ashish. Advocate Ashish provides services in various fields of civil law, family dispute, criminal law, matrimonial cases, property cases, IT and cyber law etc. He has been practicing and handling cases independently with a result obtained approach, both professionally and ethically and has now acquired many years of professional experience in providing legal consultancy and advisory services.

Visit: https://advocateashishvenaik.com/

Phone no.: +91 96469 91339

Email: info@advocateashishvenaik.com

[sattvalegal]

One of the best corporate law firms in Kolkata is Sattva Legal, which provides knowledgeable legal advice on business and intellectual property issues. Our team, which consists of seasoned criminal divorce advocates in the Kolkata High Court and top IPR lawyers in Calcutta, offers expert representation for challenging matters. Sattva Legal is a reputable law practice that provides customized solutions to satisfy clients' needs in the areas of divorce, intellectual property, and corporate law. Select Sattva Legal for trustworthy legal assistance in Kolkata; they are committed to obtaining positive results in a variety of legal matters.

[advocate-paresh-m-modi]

Debit freeze Bank Account by Gujarat Cyber Crime Gandhinagar | 9925002031 | Cyber Crime Lawyer in Gujarat

Debit freeze Bank Account by Gujarat Cyber Crime Gandhinagar | 9925002031 | Cyber Crime Lawyer in Gujarat

[shilpi2024sharma]

Who is Delhi's best criminal lawyer?

Selecting the appropriate legal representation is crucial in the maze of legal proceedings. For those in Delhi who need legal assistance in criminal situations, finding the finest criminal lawyer might be a difficult task. When there are so many possibilities, it becomes critical to discern between what is excellent and what is only adequate. We present the pinnacle of legal knowledge in Delhi in this extensive guide, helping you find the best criminal lawyer for your requirements. Locating the Best criminal lawyer in Delhi can be a daunting task. With numerous law firms and legal practitioners claiming to offer unparalleled expertise, it's crucial to delve deeper and uncover the best criminal lawyer who can safeguard your rights and champion your case with unwavering dedication.

The Essence of Excellence: Defining Delhi's Best Criminal Lawyer

Experience and Expertise: Pillars of Legal Proficiency

Delhi's best criminal lawyer is not merely defined by qualifications but by a rich tapestry of experience and expertise. With years of practice in navigating the complexities of criminal law, they possess a nuanced understanding of legal intricacies. Their track record is characterized by a history of successful case resolutions and client satisfaction.

Unwavering Dedication: A Commitment to Client Advocacy

The best criminal lawyer in Delhi is fundamentally committed to advocating on behalf of his or her clients. They prioritize their clients' well-being and build lasting interactions with them beyond just providing legal assistance. Using a client-centered approach, they provide customized tactics based on the particulars of each case, guaranteeing a thorough and sympathetic legal journey.

The Path to Justice: Services Offered by Delhi's Best Criminal Lawyer

Legal Consultation: Enlightening Pathways Forward

Embarking on a legal journey can be overwhelming, laden with uncertainty and confusion. Delhi's best criminal lawyer provides a beacon of clarity through comprehensive legal consultations. They elucidate the intricacies of criminal law, empowering clients with knowledge and understanding to make informed decisions about their legal matters.

Case Representation: A Shield in the Courtroom

Being able to navigate the courtroom takes more than just legal knowledge; it also takes strategic dexterity and unrelenting advocacy. The best criminal attorney in Delhi is a resolute advocate for their clients, painstakingly developing defense plans and fiercely fighting for them. They skillfully and gracefully negotiate the intricacies of criminal proceedings thanks to their keen attention to detail and unwavering determination.

Legal Counseling: Guiding Through Legal Turbulence

Legal challenges extend beyond the courtroom, permeating various aspects of clients' lives. Delhi's best criminal lawyer offers comprehensive legal counseling, guiding clients through every facet of their legal journey. From pre-trial preparations to post-conviction remedies, they provide unwavering support and guidance, ensuring clients are equipped to face any legal obstacle with confidence.

Testimonials: Voices of Trust and Confidence

Client Success Stories: Testimonials of Triumph

The true measure of a lawyer's prowess lies in the testimonials of satisfied clients. Delhi's best criminal lawyer boasts a repertoire of success stories, each testament to their unparalleled legal acumen and unwavering dedication. From acquittals to mitigated sentences, clients share tales of triumph made possible by their lawyer's expertise and advocacy.

Industry Recognition: Accolades of Excellence

Beyond client testimonials, industry recognition further solidifies Delhi's best criminal lawyer's a standing for excellence. In addition to being showered with awards and recognition, peers and legal authorities hold them in high regard for their contributions to the legal profession. Their acknowledgment, which ranges from invitations to legal symposiums to accolades for legal brilliance, is proof of their lasting influence on Delhi's legal scene.

Frequently Asked Questions:

What qualities should I look for in a criminal lawyer?

Look for expertise, experience, track record, and a client-centric approach.

How do I assess a lawyer's track record?

Review their past cases, success rate, and client testimonials.

Is it essential to hire a local lawyer?

While local familiarity can be beneficial, prioritize expertise and experience over geographical proximity.

What questions should I ask during the initial consultation?

Inquire about their experience, approach to your case, fees, and communication protocols.

Can I afford a top criminal lawyer in Delhi?

Many lawyers offer flexible payment plans or pro bono services based on financial need. It's essential to discuss fee structures during the initial consultation.

How can I verify a lawyer's credentials?

Check their bar association membership, credentials, and any disciplinary actions against them.

In the pursuit of justice, the importance of exceptional legal representation cannot be overstated. Delhi's best criminal lawyer shines as a beacon of excellence, providing clients with steadfast dedication and unmatched knowledge as they navigate the complexity of criminal law. They represent the best legal advocacy in Delhi, with a proven track record of accomplishment and a legacy of satisfied clients, making sure that justice is served to all. Selecting the best criminal lawyer in Delhi is not merely a matter of legal representation, but a choice that has the power to influence how your life turns out. With our unrelenting dedication to excellence, unmatched knowledge, and proven track record of accomplishment, [Firm Name] stands out as the legal landscape's top contender in Delhi.

Go to the website for further information: www.bestcybercrimelawyer.in

[adrohitdhanawat]

Advocacy Excellence: Best Civil Lawyers in the Capital

Welcome to a league of legal excellence with the Best Civil Lawyers in Delhi. Our distinguished team of legal professionals stands as a paragon of expertise and commitment in navigating the complexities of civil law. Renowned for their strategic acumen and unwavering dedication, our lawyers have earned a stellar reputation for delivering unparalleled results.

With a deep understanding of the nuances of civil litigation, our attorneys bring forth a wealth of experience to every case they handle. Whether it's dispute resolution, property matters, contractual disputes, or any other civil legal issue, our team is equipped to provide meticulous guidance and representation.

[raizadalawassociates]

Law firm in delhi

In a dynamic and diverse city like Delhi, legal matters often arise, necessitating the expertise of a reliable law firm. Whether you're facing personal or business-related legal challenges, finding the right legal partner is crucial for a favorable outcome. With numerous options to choose from, selecting the perfect Law Firm in Delhi can be a daunting task. This article aims to guide you through the process, helping you make an informed decision.

Assess Your Needs:

Before embarking on your search for a Law Firm in Delhi, it's essential to determine the specific legal assistance you require. Whether it's related to family law, real estate, corporate matters, or criminal defense, understanding your needs will narrow down the list of suitable firms.

Research and Referrals:

Word of mouth can be a powerful tool in your quest for the right law firm. Seek recommendations from friends, family, or colleagues who have had positive experiences with Delhi law firms. Additionally, extensive online research can provide valuable insights into the reputation and track record of various firms.

Expertise and Experience:

One of the primary factors to consider is the expertise and experience of the law firm's attorneys. Look for firms with a history of handling cases similar to yours. Seasoned lawyers often possess the knowledge and skills needed to navigate complex legal situations effectively.

Reputation Matters:

The reputation of a law firm can be a strong indicator of its reliability. Read client reviews and testimonials to gauge the firm's reputation in the legal community. A reputable law firm in Delhi is more likely to provide high-quality legal services.

Legal Fees and Costs:

Understanding the fee structure of a law firm is essential. It's important to have a clear understanding of how the firm charges for its services, whether it's hourly rates, contingency fees, or a fixed fee. Make sure the fee arrangement aligns with your budget and expectations.

Communication and Accessibility:

Effective communication is key to a successful attorney-client relationship. Choose a law firm that is responsive, listens to your concerns, and keeps you informed about the progress of your case. Accessibility to your attorney when you need assistance is crucial.

Location and Convenience:

Consider the location of the Law Firm in Delhi. Choosing one that is easily accessible and situated in a convenient location can save you time and hassle when attending meetings, hearings, or consultations.

Initial Consultation:

Most law firms offer an initial consultation where you can discuss your case and evaluate whether the firm is the right fit for your legal needs. Use this opportunity to ask questions and get a feel for the firm's approach to your case.

In conclusion, choosing the right law firm in Delhi requires thorough research, careful consideration of your needs, and a clear understanding of the firm's expertise and reputation. With the right legal partner by your side, you can navigate the complex legal landscape with confidence and increase your chances of a successful outcome in your legal matters.

[lawandlegal]

Our top criminal lawyers in India have years of training and have solved a lot of cases and brought many people to justice. All your problems will come to an end when you hire a top criminal lawyers in India. This way you can be assured about your safe about your future.

[zvaigzdelasas]

With a history of short-term governments in Nepal’s 15 years of democratic progression, the current reconfiguration is no surprise, and it will be no surprise if the Maoists get back again with the Nepali Congress in months and years to come.

Power sharing, political discontent, ideological differences, underperformance, and pressure to restore Nepal to a Hindu state – a long list of reasons reportedly forced the Maoists to sever ties with the Nepali Congress. While the Nepali Congress expected the Maoist leader and current prime minister, Pushpa Kamal Dahal (also known by his nom de guerre, Prachanda) to leave the alliance, it did not expect an overnight turnaround. [...]

Dahal reportedly conveyed to the Nepali Congress chair, former Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba, that external pressure forced him to join hands with CPN-UML and form a new government.

If this assertion is true, China emerges as a plausible factor, given its historical inclination toward forging alliances with leftist parties in Nepal. This notion gains credence in light of China’s past efforts, such as its unsuccessful attempt in 2020 to mediate the conflict between Oli and Dahal.

On the other hand, India has enjoyed a comfortable working relationship with the Nepali Congress and the Maoists. Although Maoists were a challenging party for New Delhi to get along with when Dahal first gained the prime minister’s seat in 2008, the two have come a long way in working together. However, the CPN-UML has advocated closer ties with the northern neighbor China; Beijing suits both their ideological requirements and their ultra-nationalistic outlook – which is primarily anti-India. [...]

India faces challenges in aligning with the Left Alliance for two key reasons. First, the energy trade between Nepal and India has grown crucial over the past couple of years. However, India strictly purchases power generated through its own investments in Nepal, refusing any power produced with Chinese involvement. With the CPN-UML now in government, Nepal may seek alterations in this arrangement despite the benefits of power trade in reducing its trade deficit with India.

Second, India stands to lose the smooth cooperation it enjoyed with the recently dissolved Maoist-Congress coalition. During the dissolved government, the Nepali Congress held the Foreign Ministry, fostering a favorable equation for India. Just last month, Foreign Minister N.P. Saud visited India for the 9th Raisina Dialogue, engaging with top Indian officials, including his counterpart, S. Jaishankar.

As concerns arise for India regarding the Left Alliance, there is also potential for shifts in the partnership between Nepal and the United States, a significant development ally. Particularly, there may be a slowdown in the implementation of the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) projects. Despite facing domestic and Chinese opposition, the Nepali Parliament finally approved a $500 million MCC grant from the United States in 2022, following a five-year delay.

China perceives the MCC as a component of the U.S.-led Indo-Pacific strategy, countering its BRI. Hence Beijing aims to increase Chinese loans and subsidies to Nepal to enhance its influence.

To conclude, the re-emergence of Nepal’s Left Alliance signals a shift in power dynamics, impacting domestic politics and regional geopolitics. With China’s influence growing, Nepal’s foreign policy may tilt further toward Beijing, challenging India’s interests. This shift poses challenges for India, particularly in trade and diplomatic relations, while also affecting Nepal’s partnerships with other key players like the United States.

[[The Author,] Dr. Rishi Gupta is the assistant director of the Asia Society Policy Institute, Delhi]

6 Mar 24

[city-of-ladies]

Edith Garrud - The suffragette that knew martial arts

The first British female teacher of jujutsu, Edith Garrud (1872-1971) taught the suffragettes to protect themselves.

A passion for martial arts 

Edith Margaret Williams was born in Bath in 1872 and started her career as a physical instructor for girls. She shared this passion for physical culture with her husband, William Garrud, a wrestling and boxing instructor.

They came in contact with Edward Barton-Wright who had spent three years in Japan, and studied judo and jujutsu. He elaborated his self-defense techniques known as “bartitsu” and opened his club in London in 1899.

The Bartitsu Club was notably opened to women. Edith was thus able to train alongside her husband. By 1908, Edith and William became jujutsu instructors themselves with William in charge of the men’s class and Edith teaching the women and children. 

Jujutsu specializes in speed, precision and the use of soft, flowing movements to deal with aggression rather than using just brute strength. The couple showcased their skills through demonstrations. In one of them, Edith defeated a male aggressor played by her husband. The sight of this 4ft-11inch (150cm) woman effortlessly throwing a much taller man greatly impressed the audience. 

In 1907, Edith starred in a short film Jujutsu down the footpads in which an innocent lady overpowers two ruffians. 

Vote for women

Edith took an interest in the cause of women’s suffrage. In 1909, she was invited by the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU) to give a demonstration in the presence of Emeline Pankhurst and other leading figures of the movement. As William was ill, Edith demonstrated alone and invited members of the audience to test her skills. This included subjecting a skeptical police officer to a powerful shoulder throw. 

In 1910, Edith also wrote a series of essays, advocating for the growing community of female martial artists and how self-defense could free women by giving them the means to protect themselves:

“You constantly read in the papers reports of dastardly attacks on helpless women by thieves and ruffians. A woman who knows jujutsu, even though she may not be physically strong, even though she may not have even an umbrella or parasol, is not helpless. I know many women personally who have tried the tricks I shall explain to you and come out on top. They have brought great burly cowards nearly twice their size to their feet and made them howl for mercy.”

The bodyguards

The suffragettes faced dangerous and violent situations. This was especially the case on Friday 18th November 1910. 300 WSPU members marched on the House of Parliament and faced police officers armed with batons. Women were subjected to six hours of beatings and arrests and there were widespread reports of sexual abuses.

Emeline Pankhurst thus asked Edith to train a group of women that would be known within the WSPU as the Bodyguard. Led by Gertrude Harding, they acted as agitators, disruptors and decoys. 

Edith trained them in hand-to-hand combat and the use of homemade concealed weapons such as wooden India clubs and the fashioning of cardboard body armor. The suffragettes took advantage of their opponent's surprise and exploited their weaknesses.

They for instance struck directly at a police officer’s helmet to knock it from his head. Policemen were held accountable for the loss of uniform items and had to pay for their replacement. They cut the suspenders so that the policeman had to hold back his pants, blinded the police with a charge of umbrellas etc.

When told by a policeman that she was making an “obstruction” during a demonstration near the House of Commons, Edith pretended to drop her handkerchief, threw the policeman over her shoulder and disappeared into the crowd. 

In prison, suffragettes went on hunger strikes and were subjected to force-feeding. The “Cat and Mouse Act” of 1913 allowed hunger-striking prisoners to be released and then re-incarcerated as soon as they had recovered their health. The Bodyguard thus protected and hid those women.

Edith for instance hid militant suffragettes in her dojo, telling the police not to disturb her lessons and leave her property. 

A quiet retirement

Edith’s contributions to the suffragist movement ended with the beginning of the First World War. Little is known of her life afterward. 

She and her husband would run the Golden Square dojo until their retirement in 1925 and retired to a quieter life. William passed away in 1960. In an interview in 1965, Edith said that her recipe for a long, happy and healthy life was: 

“Self-discipline. Of course, I had to be extremely disciplined to succeed at jujutsu and hold my own with men […] but it is the mind which really has control, not only of your muscles and your limbs and how you use them, but also your thoughts, your whole attitude to life and other people.”

She died in 1971. A plaque on the building that had been her home can be seen today: “Edith Garrud 1872–1971. The suffragette who knew jiu-jitsu lived here”.

Further reading

Dorlin Elsa, Se défendre : une philosophie de la violence  

Godfrey Emelyne, Femininity, Crime and Self-Defence in Victorian Literature and Society: From Dagger-Fans to Suffragettes

Kelly Simon, "Edith Garrud: The jujutsuffragette". In McMurray, Robert; Pullen, Allison (eds.), Power, Politics and Exclusion in Organization and Management

Ruz Camila, Parkinson Justin, ““'Suffrajitsu': How the suffragettes fought back using martial arts”

[therealdesitalk]

hi!!! since we're questioning stuff, i wanted to say this, it's been on my mind for a while now.....

what is bollywood trying to do making AND promoting films like 'animal' and 'kabir singh'?????

they are clearly promoting toxic masculinity and violence which is affecting the public sooooo much......and they got the nerve to defend it as well????!!!!!

there are sooooo many films now which promote violence......ranbir kapoor is an excellent actor, yet it's sad to see his most successful film was 'animal' and not 'barfi' which is actually touching.....you know why?? because this is exactly what people want to see, violence, uncontrolled rage and madness......

the uneducated section of the society is very influenced by this and this is pretty well known, then why make films like this???

why not make more films on moving topics THAT ACTUALLY FUCKING MATTER and cause people to change their mentality????

people are much more affected by movies than by books, especially in our country, where sadly, a large population still does not have access to books and education.....what's worse is that learned and educated people also don't actually fucking care and promote this kind of bullshit......

please share your opinion and also reblog.....i wanna hear more about this from different people as well......

Thanks for reaching out i appreciate you taking the time to ask a question, And i am happy that every girl is asking such questions to support each other

So namaste everyone

In my view many directors in India focus on making movies that make a lot of money. These movies often include things like sex, violence, and negative portrayals of women which have been popular for a long time. Unfortunately people have gotten used to these kinds of movies and directors care more about making money than about the impact their movies have on society however not all directors are like this. Some directors want to make movies that show women in a positive way It's important to support these directors and their movies so that we can have more respectful and inclusive films. But people don't give much attention to good movies if we create good marketing of good movies and make their good scenes go viral on the internet maybe it's possible that more people will watch good movies This way directors will also realize that people's preferences are changing

The Impact of Such Movies : Movies that glorify toxic masculinity and perpetuate misogyny can have a detrimental impact on society. They reinforce harmful gender norms, normalize abusive behavior and contribute to the marginalization of women. Additionally they can influence audience perceptions and attitudes shaping societal beliefs and behaviors. It's crucial to critically examine these movies and engage in discussions about their implications while also advocating for more socially responsible and inclusive storytelling in the film industry.

👉🏻 So Let's Jump On Some Questions 👈🏻

Why Male Directors Make Such Kind Of Movies?

Male dominated industry : The Indian film industry is largely controlled by men. This means that the stories being told are often filtered through a male lens and women are frequently portrayed in one dimensional or stereotypical ways.

Audience demand: There's a perception that a large section of the audience prefers these kinds of films. Masala movies with over the top action romance and violence have long been a staple of Bollywood and filmmakers may be reluctant to deviate from this formula for fear of losing box office revenue.

Societal factors: Sexism and misogyny are deeply ingrained in Indian society nd this is reflected in the films that are produced. Films often mirror and reinforce existing social prejudices making it difficult to break the cycle

👉🏻 So, What Can Be Done To Reduce Sexism In Indian Films?👈🏻

Encourage more women in filmmaking: Increasing the number of women in key decision making roles, such as directors, producers, and writers, can help bring about a more balanced perspective in films.

Because guys! if movies are made from a female perspective there will be significant changes seen in the movie industry so encourage your friends and cousins to talk about these things

Make Everyone Aware! Aware! Aware! :

If someone in your house talks about movies like "Animal" and "Kabir Singh" and says it's just a movie sit down and explain to them that what you watch is not normal. Even if you receive negative feedback you know what your job is - make everyone around you aware of this issue. Don't let these movies be normalized which people have modernized.

Take Advantage Of The Internet : Promote Media Literacy educate the public through internet especially young people about media literacy and critical thinking skills teach them to analyze and question the messages portrayed in movies on Instagram, Twitter (X) Reddit , Facebook , Blogs including recognizing and challenging harmful stereotypes and representations

����🏻👇🏻

Last note : And we should keep hyping movies like women empowerment on the internet. We have the internet in our hands so let's make good use of it. Otherwise what's the point of sitting and thinking about what's happening in society? Don't just think do something even if it's a small step like what I'm doing with my blog. I know that not many girls will reach it but those who do are a big number for me. So, spread women empowerment movies and their scenes everywhere on the internet whether they are old or not just make them viral and spread awareness through social media and blogs

Thanks everyone. Please Reblog this. 🪷🦢🐚

[zingaplanet]

hi new tennis fan here, do you mind explaining the 2011 fedal fallout? I tried looking around but couldn't find much. Thanks in advance!

Oh ho ho mutual, thanks for the question altho I fear this might get too complicated too political too quickly hahaha I'll try to keep my answer neutral. Tennis politics is an underworld of nasty nasty business and as much as it is fascinating, it is unfortunately very different from the clean, elegant, prestigious look the sport is presented as at front, as is expected when big prize money is on the line. This is going to be quite long, as usual, so be prepared hahaha

There's a good NYT article about this whole Nadal-Federer-Djokovic council debacle which I highly reccommend (around their 2019 return to the council), but let me provide a bit of a back story to that as well.

Now this all started back in the early 2010s, Federer and Nadal were still world number 1 and 2 (oh the good old days), and they were also the leaders at the players' council (Nadal was Federer's VP). So the gist of it by end of 2011, there was a bit of a dispute, esentially about prize money, but quickly turned into a bit of everything.

Basically, after the ATP finals of that year, there was talk of changing ATP into a 2 year ranking system. This is a bit unconventional but it's actually related to how points are accumulated throughout the whole tour and the accessibility of the sports to newcomers.

Everyone kinda knows that tennis is one of the most difficult sports to break into, not only because tournament seedings are based on rankings (unlike in football for instance where it's random), meaning top players will always have preference to go all the way to the final, but also because prize money has also been reported as highly unequal. Players at the top level like Serena, Federer, Sharapova, Nadal etc earned a gazillion times more than even the top 20 players, this is because of sponsorship, but also because of the gap in prize money. More reports have been coming out on this recently, where the top 5 players in India and other countries can't even sustain themselves with prize money alone and has to take up side jobs.

The idea is that with a 2 year ranking, points will be distributed more evenly, rankings will be much more accessible and players in the top 50 will have access to better prize money. It's a bit complicated to explain technically but that's the gist of it as far as I understand.

Now the problem starts when in November that year, the players meeting saw all players (including Nadal) except Federer, the president, support the 2 year system. They were also planning to boycott the Australian Open, that they deemed were far too unfair in terms of prize money distribution as all other Grand Slams.

The dispute between the two of them also has another layer into it however. Unsurprisignly, the ranking debate is related to discussions about scheduling, in which Nadal has been strongly advocating for change since the beginning of his career.

I managed to dig up some quotes on this, it's pretty nasty (hmu if you want sources):

“"For him, it's good to say nothing, (His attitude is) "Everything is positive. It's all well and good for me, I look like a gentleman,' and the rest can burn themselves. He likes the circuit. I like the circuit. It's better than many other sports, but that doesn't mean that it couldn't be better.”

Rafa and some other players are protesting about the number of mandatory events a pro player is required to compete in during the year, arguing this is not actually sustainable for an athlete's physical condition which he himself has felt the brunt too many times.

"I love the game and there are a lot of things I'm grateful for,” Nadal said. “The game has allowed me to lead a fantastic lifestyle. But to finish your career with pain all over your body, is that a positive? No. Maybe (Federer) has got a super body and he'll finish his career like a rose. Neither myself, nor (Andy) Murray, nor (Novak) Djokovic are going to finish our careers like a rose. Tennis is an important part of my life, but it's a tough sport. We're not like him, where it's effortless to play. For all of us, it's a battle."

I believe this is the period Federer was referring to when he said "He used to follow me around with everything but then he grew to be his own person," etc.

Federer and Nadal before this period were strangely civil towards each other, even after those French Open and Wimbledon finals back to back - but this seemed to be the beginning of their souring relations. Federer handled it very discretely and only said he had “no hard feelings” toward Nadal for the comments, and Nadal also later admitted that his comments “must stay in the locker room.”

I'm not saying one player is right and the other is wrong, there is always 2 sides of the coin. A 2 year ranking system will mess a lot of things up in terms of the sport's competitiveness and spectatorship, but there is also a real pay gap problem in tennis, especially in Grand Slams, it's a very top heavy sport. It's very evident that Nadal and Federer's frustrations with each other relate a lot to their different career trajectories and playing style. Nadal said many times from the beginning that his style of play is too physicaly disruptive and I remember him saying he'd be very surprised if he's still playing in his 30s and it's obvious that Federer's injury-free career bothered him a bit, while Federer, I think is always the perfect middle-man between the players and the tournament organisers (he has very good relationship with all of them), and he understood nuances of the sports' politics and that it's never that simple to change everything, something a lot of young players don't really get I think (Nadal is a bit more politically diplomatic nowadays).

The story of the 2019 council dispute is a bit more complicated, and it actually shows how much they've built bridges over their differences as this time it was more the case of Novak vs the two of them, quite literally haha. Nadal and Federer were no longer part of the council then. I think it started with the firing of the ATP chief executive, Chris Kermode (Djokovic was the president at that time I think). Nadal and Federer were very unhappy about this and that they weren't consulted on the decision.

Federer said: “I tried to meet Novak on the deadline; unfortunately, he had no time, That’s hard to understand for me.” Nadal, who met with Federer at that tournament to discuss tour business, also echoed his displeasure.

Very spicy, huh? This actually ended up bringing both Nadal and Federer back together into the council. Federer agreed to rejoin, and he talked about it with Nadal: "I would only do it if you were going too. And he said: I also only participate if you are there too."

See his cute full interview here:

The sweetest cherry on top is actually Andy Murray, bless his little heart (he is unsurprisingly quite uninvolved with the drama hahaha). He also left the council recently and actually was really happy Federer and Nadal the duo managed to get back together into the fray. “Despite the sport’s current success we live in chaotic times,” Murray wrote on Twitter. “My biggest achievement on the council may well prove to be being part of the group of resignations that presented the opportunity for this to happen. Good luck!!!”

Anyhow, there you go, a few thousand? words on tennis politics that you clearly did not ask for but hey! nothing better to start saturday morning than some spicy drama between the world's top athletes, eh?

[sattvalegal]

Finding the Best Advocates for RERA Matters: Top Real Estate Law Firms in India

Navigating the complexities of real estate law in India has become increasingly streamlined with the introduction of RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority), established to bring transparency, accountability, and efficiency to the real estate sector. As the demand for legal support in RERA matters grows, the need to identify the best advocates and law firms specializing in these areas has never been more critical. Here’s a guide to finding the top RERA lawyers and real estate law firms in India.

Why You Need the Best Advocates for RERA Matters

RERA regulations can be intricate, involving numerous rules and compliance standards that protect buyers from fraudulent practices and delays by developers. Having the best advocates for RERA matters ensures that clients receive the highest level of legal support, whether it's regarding property disputes, delayed possession, or compensation claims. Experienced RERA lawyers are equipped to interpret these regulations, advocate for their clients' rights, and navigate the legal pathways effectively, making them indispensable to any real estate transaction or dispute.

What to Look for in the Best RERA Lawyers

When searching for the best RERA lawyers, it’s essential to consider their experience, especially in dealing with cases specific to RERA compliance and real estate law. The best lawyers for RERA in Delhi, for instance, often have a proven track record with cases handled in the RERA authority courts and real estate tribunals. They possess in-depth knowledge of the RERA Act and are skilled in offering guidance to both buyers and developers.

Top Real Estate Law Firms in India for RERA Cases

India is home to some of the top real estate law firms specializing in RERA matters. These firms offer expert legal counsel in areas like property registration, developer-buyer disputes, and RERA compliance audits. With a team of proficient advocates, these law firms support clients in ensuring their rights are protected, guiding them through property transactions and handling litigation if necessary.

Whether you’re an individual or a corporate client, choosing from the top real estate law firms in India with experienced RERA advocates will provide you with the guidance needed to handle RERA matters confidently and successfully.

[scotianostra]

The Scottish physician and inventor Neil Arnott was born on May 15th 1788.

Arnott, was born in the town of Arbroath, he  would become a very highly-regarded physician and show an inventiveness unusual for his era.

Misfortunes compelled the father, Alexander, to give up his farm and settle first at Blair and afterwards in Aberdeen. Neil was taught by his mother Ann, and at the parish school of Lunan, and in November 1798 entered Aberdeen grammar school. In 1801 he was entered as a student in the Marischal College, with a small bursary, where he remained during four sessions, and was especially interested by the lectures of Patrick Copland on natural philosophy. He graduated M.A. in 1805, and at once commenced the study of medicine in Aberdeen. He supported himself partly by acting as shop-assistant to a chemist.

By the age of 19 young Neil was a fully fledged surgeon and made two visits to China as surgeon for the British East India Company and then settled in London where his reputation would grow and grow.

He gave lectures at the Philomathic Institution and published these as Elements of physics. Arnott was one of the founders of the University of London, 1836. Within a few years he was made physician to the French and Spanish embassies, and in 1837 he became physician extraordinary to the Queen. He was elected to the Fellow of the Royal Society in 1838. He was a strong advocate of scientific, as opposed to purely classical, education.

Doctor Arnott gifted 2,000 pounds to each of the four universities of Scotland and to the University of London, to promote its study in the experimental and practical form.Of his inventions they included, a  Smokeless Fire-place, Chimney-valves, and “Other Means, Old and New of obtaining Healthful warmth and ventilation”  But is the final invention I find most interesting, he gave us the first form of waterbed. Dr Arnott’s Hydrostatic Bed, as it was known, had been created to help invalids avoid bedsores. A bath of water covered with rubber-impregnated canvas, and a lighter bedding on top, it worked a treat. The modest Arnott, however, didn’t choose to patent the idea, amazingly the waterbed was not actually patented until 1968 by an American furniture designer Charles Prior Hall, but oor Dr Arnott definitely came up with the idea first.

The water bed was first used in aid of medicine. In 1873, when Sir James Paget at St Bartholomew’s Hospital presented a waterbed designed by Arnott as a treatment and prevention of pressure ulcers (bed sores); a condition that was quite common in this era. Paget found that waterbeds allowed mattress pressure to be evenly distributed over the body. Unfortunately, this invention lacked the ability to regulate the temperature of the water.

And so we have another first from a Scot, the waterbed!

Neil Arnott died in London in 1874 but is buried with his mother in Dean Cemetery in Edinburgh.

[harryandmeghansussex]

Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex is a feminist, champion of human rights and gender equity, and global role model. Her lifelong advocacy for women and girls remains a constant thread she weaves through both humanitarian and business ventures. She is noted as one of the most powerful and influential women in the world, topping lists such as TIME Magazine’s Most Influential People, The Financial Times’ 25 Most Influential Women, Variety Power of Women, and British Vogue’s Vogue 25. She and her husband, Prince Harry have also been the recipients of the NAACP President’s Award as well as the Robert F. Kennedy Ripple of Hope Award. Meghan’s global impact, and strong stance on resilience, equality, and compassion through action, have made her one of the most iconic public figures of this generation.

Born and raised in Southern California, Meghan attended Los Angeles based all-girls Catholic School, Immaculate Heart, which she continues to support as an alumna, before moving to Chicago to attend the prestigious Northwestern University. While there, she double majored in Theater and International Relations, and went on to intern at the US Embassy in Buenos Aires, Argentina, as well as to study abroad in Madrid, Spain. After graduation, Meghan turned her focus to the entertainment industry, landing her big break as a lead actor on the hit series, ‘Suits’ which she starred in for seven seasons. During her time off between filming, Meghan travelled to Rwanda, India, and across the globe working on humanitarian missions, and serving in key roles such as: UN Women’s Advocate for Women’s Political Participation and Leadership, a World Vision Global Ambassador, and a leading Counsellor to One Young World, where she inspired youth and women around the world through her passionate advocacy and hands-on approach to being of service. She also travelled to support the military community on a USO Tour, visiting six military bases in seven days including Bagram, Afghanistan. In 2018, Meghan married Prince Harry, becoming The Duchess of Sussex.

An accomplished writer, she has contributed pieces to publications in the UK, US, and Ireland, and parlayed that skill into the creation of the successful lifestyle website, ‘The Tig’, where her thoughtful and inspiring op-eds cultivated a global fanbase. The Duchess of Sussex was the first guest editor in the history of British Vogue for their July Issue in 2019, which was the fastest selling copy in the history of the publication. She and Prince Harry founded The Archewell Foundation in 2020 to support communities in need at a micro and macro level, in both moments of crisis as well as for long term aid. At The Archewell Foundation, they hold the value that charitable work should not simply be ‘a handout, but rather a hand held’, a phrase which Meghan first coined when supporting UK charity Smart Works, of which she is patron, that uplifts and prepares underserved women to enter the workforce. Meghan and her husband also founded and oversee production company, Archewell Productions and podcasting arm, Archewell Audio. In 2022, Meghan launched ‘Archetypes’, a record-breaking podcast exploring the labels that try to hold women back; ‘Archetypes’ debuted at Number 1 in The US, UK, Australia, Ireland, and New Zealand, and topped the charts as the Number 1 podcast in 47 countries, demonstrating her unparalleled global reach. After its first season, Archetypes was awarded was awarded The People’s Choice Award in the podcast category.

She is a NY Times Best Selling author, publishing her highly celebrated children’s book, ‘The Bench’, and “Together: Our Community Kitchen” a publication she spearheaded with the women of the Hubb Community Kitchen in the UK, who were displaced after the tragic Grenfell Fire. True to her character, The Duchess of Sussex mobilized to turn pain into purpose, working alongside this dynamic group of women to help them heal, grow, and develop their own business enterprises in the face of adversity. In addition to topping the NY Times Bestsellers list, “Together,” also debuted as number one on the UK’s Sunday Booklist, with proceeds going to the Kitchen. Meghan’s influence in fashion has been coined “The Meghan Effect” with items selling out within hours of her wearing them. Her ‘effect’ has transcended fashion, shifting cultural conversations as seen with her op-ed for the NY Times “The Losses We Share.” The piece detailed a heartbreaking personal loss which spiked the conversation surrounding miscarriage to the highest it had been spoken of in over two decades at the time of publishing.

Meghan is a passionate advocate for mental health and family care, the holistic support of women and children’s rights, and the immeasurable value of one’s self worth. Her core belief that representation matters, and her connection to community through the lens of learning, healing, and inspiring have helped define her as a cultural catalyst for positive change. Meghan resides in California with her husband and their children Prince Archie Harrison and Princess Lilibet Diana, and their three dogs.