#Threadripper CPUs

[phonemantra-blog]

The company reported for the third quarter of fiscal year 2023 A few days after Intel, AMD also published its financial report. The company has completed the third quarter of fiscal year 2023. [caption id="attachment_78911" align="aligncenter" width="780"] AMD's[/caption] If Intel's revenue decreased and net profit fell by more than 70%, then AMD's situation is better. Revenue rose 8% to $5.8 billion, and operating profit amounted to $224 million versus a loss of $64 million a year earlier. Net income rose more than 1,000% to $299 million. AMD's net profit grew by 1000% and equaled Intel's net profit By the way, Intel's net profit was only $1 million higher, which is very interesting. At the same time, Intel's revenue is almost 2.5 times higher than that of its competitor. It’s also worth noting that the data center products segment did not grow year-on-year in the past quarter, although it has been actively driving AMD’s revenue upward in recent years. But sales in the consumer segment increased by 42%, mainly due to the full entry into the market of Ryzen 7000 mobile APUs. AMD's gaming business fell 8% due to lower revenue from sales of semi-custom products.

[blubberquark]

Share Your Anecdotes: Multicore Pessimisation

I took a look at the specs of new 7000 series Threadripper CPUs, and I really don't have any excuse to buy one, even if I had the money to spare. I thought long and hard about different workloads, but nothing came to mind.

Back in university, we had courses about map/reduce clusters, and I experimented with parallel interpreters for Prolog, and distributed computing systems. What I learned is that the potential performance gains from better data structures and algorithms trump the performance gains from fancy hardware, and that there is more to be gained from using the GPU or from re-writing the performance-critical sections in C and making sure your data structures take up less memory than from multi-threaded code. Of course, all this is especially important when you are working in pure Python, because of the GIL.

The performance penalty of parallelisation hits even harder when you try to distribute your computation between different computers over the network, and the overhead of serialisation, communication, and scheduling work can easily exceed the gains of parallel computation, especially for small to medium workloads. If you benchmark your Hadoop cluster on a toy problem, you may well find that it's faster to solve your toy problem on one desktop PC than a whole cluster, because it's a toy problem, and the gains only kick in when your data set is too big to fit on a single computer.

The new Threadripper got me thinking: Has this happened to somebody with just a multicore CPU? Is there software that performs better with 2 cores than with just one, and better with 4 cores than with 2, but substantially worse with 64? It could happen! Deadlocks, livelocks, weird inter-process communication issues where you have one process per core and every one of the 64 processes communicates with the other 63 via pipes? There could be software that has a badly optimised main thread, or a badly optimised work unit scheduler, and the limiting factor is single-thread performance of that scheduler that needs to distribute and integrate work units for 64 threads, to the point where the worker threads are mostly idling and only one core is at 100%.

I am not trying to blame any programmer if this happens. Most likely such software was developed back when quad-core CPUs were a new thing, or even back when there were multi-CPU-socket mainboards, and the developer never imagined that one day there would be Threadrippers on the consumer market. Programs from back then, built for Windows XP, could still run on Windows 10 or 11.

In spite of all this, I suspect that this kind of problem is quite rare in practice. It requires software that spawns one thread or one process per core, but which is deoptimised for more cores, maybe written under the assumption that users have for two to six CPU cores, a user who can afford a Threadripper, and needs a Threadripper, and a workload where the problem is noticeable. You wouldn't get a Threadripper in the first place if it made your workflows slower, so that hypothetical user probably has one main workload that really benefits from the many cores, and another that doesn't.

So, has this happened to you? Dou you have a Threadripper at work? Do you work in bioinformatics or visual effects? Do you encode a lot of video? Do you know a guy who does? Do you own a Threadripper or an Ampere just for the hell of it? Or have you tried to build a Hadoop/Beowulf/OpenMP cluster, only to have your code run slower?

I would love to hear from you.

[heavenpierceher]

youtube to me is the speedrun analysis+vintage hardware decompilation videos machine. every video i watch is titled some shit like Racing the Beam Explained - Atari 2600 CPU vs. CRT Television or SSL Pyramid from Lower Entrance A Presses (Inside 1xA, Puzzle 1xA) or 100 Copies of Doom vs Threadripper 7995WX PRO 96-core 192-thread CPU or some shit. I think my version of the website is better

[demigirlboss2girlrotboogaloo]

Honestly, this can't last. It'll collapse eventually, and when it does a *lot* of things are going to end up in landfills. Cloud computing was supposed to be cheaper, easier, more scalable, but as time's gone on the price gouging by both hardware vendors and the hyperscalers that provide the services has made it less and less viable for most people and organizations to opt for cloud storage and compute. I can't find the exact quote right now, but Wendell from Level1Techs once made a really good point about how it used to be that you would just buy a thinclient, and hook it up to a cloud compute server, and you wouldn't have to worry about stocking and maintaining expensive hardware. But nowadays, the cost of cloud storage and compute and honestly even the thinclients is so ridiculously astronomical that in a lot of cases organizations are better off just getting high power NUCs instead, since while yes a fleet of those might cost you fifty-odd thousand dollars, you will have already made that money back in a year from all the cloud subscriptions you aren't paying anymore.

And again, as much as hyperscalers like IBM and Google are to blame for this, the hardware vendors are equally to blame. Nvidia's getting as high as 1000% margins on some of their products, and AMD isn't far behind. Intel is thankfully still willing to price themselves into categories that their competitors sneer at, but that's only gonna last until they get established in the dGPU business again (shoutout Knight's Landing my beloved), which would also propel their CPU offerings higher (and frankly at the moment I trust Sapphire Rapids more than I do Threadripper, don't think we forgot about what you did to TR5000 you bastards), which are significantly higher margin products due to being produced directly by Intel Foundry Services rather than an external fab (namely TSMC) like their GPUs are.

So yeah, give it a bit, the bubble will burst soon enough and if it doesn't hopefully USB4 PCIe passthrough catches on on phones and other mobile devices. Fingers fucking crossed. And if we're feeling brave let's maybe pray that USB-IF writes a USB standard that actually includes all the features instead of me having to buy Thunderbolt cables.

smartphone storage plateauing in favor of just storing everything in the cloud is such dogshit. i should be able to have like a fucking terabyte of data on my phone at this point. i hate the fucking cloud

[playitvison]

The new AMD Ryzen AI Max laptop CPU is like “Threadripper in your hands”

According to a senior AMD colleague, he owns one of the new companies AMD Ryzen AI Max laptop CPUs are a bit like having a “Threadripper to fit in the palm of your hands.” It’s all thanks to an all-new chip design, codenamed Strix Halo, which combines 16 cores with a surprisingly powerful integrated GPU. these AMD Strix Halo Central processing units (CPUs), which so far includes the recently…

[granth]

Building PCs for Creative Professionals: Optimized Systems for Design and Rendering

Introduction

Creative professionals, such as graphic designers, video editors, and 3D animators, demand high-performance PCs tailored for intensive software like Adobe Creative Suite, Blender, and Maya. This case study highlights Kryptronix’s approach to designing systems optimized for creative workflows, ensuring efficiency and reliability.

1. Challenges in Creative Workflows

Creative tasks involve demanding applications that require specialized hardware configurations:

High Computational Power: Complex rendering tasks and multitasking strain the CPU.

Graphics-Intensive Work: High-quality visuals demand powerful GPUs for smooth operation.

Large Storage Needs: High-resolution media files require extensive storage solutions.

System Stability: Continuous rendering or editing sessions need robust cooling and power management.

2. Hardware Requirements for Creatives

To meet the demands of creative workflows, PCs must include:

Multi-Core CPUs: AMD Ryzen Threadripper or Intel Core i9 for handling heavy workloads.

Professional-Grade GPUs: NVIDIA RTX Studio or Quadro series for accelerated rendering.

Ample RAM: Minimum 32GB for smooth multitasking across design applications.

Fast Storage Solutions: NVMe SSDs for quick file access and rendering speeds.

Advanced Cooling Systems: Ensures system stability during intensive operations.

3. Kryptronix’s Approach to Creative PCs

Kryptronix designs PCs specifically for creative professionals, focusing on:

Customized Component Selection: Tailored to the software and workflows of the user.

Workflow Optimization: Ensuring seamless integration of hardware and creative tools.

Aesthetic and Functional Design: Combining sleek builds with practical cable management and cooling.

Scalable Builds: Systems that grow with the professional’s evolving needs.

4. Case Example: A 3D Animator’s Dream Machine

A 3D artist approached Kryptronix seeking a PC capable of rendering high-quality animations efficiently. The solution included:

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Processor: Reduced rendering times by 50%.

NVIDIA RTX 4090 GPU: Enabled real-time previews of complex scenes.

64GB DDR5 RAM: Supported multitasking across Blender, Photoshop, and After Effects.

2TB NVMe SSD and 4TB HDD: Offered fast access to active projects and extensive file storage.

This build allowed the animator to complete projects faster and handle larger, more complex scenes effortlessly.

5. Why Choose Kryptronix for Creative PCs?

Kryptronix stands out by delivering high-performance systems tailored for creatives with:

Expert Guidance: Ensuring the right hardware for the software you use.

High Reliability: Systems designed for uninterrupted creative workflows.

Lifetime Technical Support: Keeping your system up-to-date and running smoothly.

Conclusion

Creative professionals need PCs that can handle the rigors of design and rendering. Kryptronix combines cutting-edge hardware with tailored configurations to empower creatives to produce exceptional work with efficiency and precision.

Unleash your creative potential with Kryptronix at Kryptronix.

[computer8920]

Intel vs AMD: A Deep Dive into the Ongoing Processor Battle

In the ever-evolving world of computer hardware, Intel and AMD have been locked in a fierce competition for processor supremacy. This rivalry has fueled tremendous innovation, pushing both companies to create CPUs that offer the best performance, efficiency, and value for consumers. From their historical beginnings to the current market dynamics, this battle continues to shape the landscape of modern computing.

Historical Background

The Intel vs. AMD rivalry dates back to the 1980s when AMD entered the microprocessor market. Intel had already established itself as the dominant player with its x86 architecture, but AMD quickly became a worthy adversary by introducing processors that were compatible with Intel’s design while also offering more affordable alternatives. This competition laid the foundation for a series of innovations, where both companies continually sought to outpace each other in speed, efficiency, and features.

Over the years, Intel and AMD have each pushed the boundaries of CPU technology. Their rivalry has given consumers a wide variety of processors to choose from, catering to diverse needs and budgets, thus benefiting the tech community at large.

Current Market Dynamics

Today, Intel and AMD continue to battle for market share across multiple segments, including consumer desktops and laptops, high-performance computing, and server markets. Both companies offer a range of processors designed for specific use cases, leading to competitive pricing and performance improvements.

Consumer Desktops and Laptops

In the consumer market, Intel and AMD target users with different performance levels. Intel’s Core i3, i5, i7, and i9 series compete directly with AMD’s Ryzen 3, 5, 7, and 9 processors. The choice often boils down to individual needs—whether it's gaming, content creation, or multitasking.

AMD has made notable strides in recent years with its Ryzen series, which provides more cores and threads than Intel’s offerings at similar price points. This makes AMD appealing to users requiring excellent multi-threaded performance for tasks like video editing, rendering, and gaming.

High-Performance Computing

For power users in fields like 3D modeling, video production, and scientific simulations, Intel’s Core X-Series and AMD’s Ryzen Threadripper are the go-to processors. Both companies have focused on delivering top-tier performance for these demanding applications, often leveraging cutting-edge technology to gain an edge.

Server and Data Center

The battle extends to the server and data center markets, where Intel’s Xeon processors and AMD’s EPYC chips compete for dominance. AMD has made significant inroads with EPYC, challenging Intel’s long-standing lead in this space with processors that offer high core counts and superior performance-per-dollar ratios.

Key Differentiators

Several factors differentiate Intel and AMD processors, influencing the choice of consumers and businesses alike.

Architecture: Intel uses its x86 architecture, while AMD employs its AMD64 architecture. Both designs differ in instruction execution and power efficiency.

Manufacturing Process: Both companies have advanced their manufacturing processes. Intel historically led in this area, but AMD has caught up with its shift to 7nm and 5nm processes, closing the performance gap.

Integrated Graphics: Intel processors often feature integrated graphics. At the same time, AMD’s Ryzen chips also offer integrated Radeon graphics, making them strong contenders for users who want decent graphics performance without a dedicated GPU.

Price-Performance Ratio: AMD has built a reputation for offering competitive price-to-performance ratios, providing more cores at lower prices. Intel, however, focuses on specialized features like Quick Sync for video encoding and Thunderbolt support.

Conclusion

The Intel vs. AMD rivalry continues to drive advancements in CPU technology, ensuring consumers have access to cutting-edge, competitively priced processors. Whether you're focused on gaming, content creation, or enterprise-level computing, both companies offer compelling options that cater to various needs. Ultimately, the ongoing competition between Intel and AMD benefits consumers, guaranteeing powerful, efficient processors and pushing the boundaries of what’s possible in computing.

Want to Buy Intel and AMD CPUs in Bulk at Affordable Prices from VSTL?

VSTL offers a wide selection of processors from leading brands, ensuring high performance, efficiency, and competitive pricing. Whether you need processors for desktops, laptops, or high-performance computing, VSTL provides bulk purchasing options tailored to your needs. With access to the latest models and excellent customer service, buying Intel and AMD CPUs in bulk from VSTL is a smart choice for businesses and tech enthusiasts looking to save while upgrading their systems.

[hotnew-pt]

Manual de placa da ASUS pode indicar 3D V-Cache em processadores Threadripper #ÚltimasNotícias #tecnologia

Hot News Créditos: ASUS A próxima geração de processadores AMD Threadripper pode oferecer ao menos um SKU com 3D V-Cache, se o rumor da vez estiver correto. A informação apareceu no manual de uma placa-mãe ASUS WRX90, onde se explica configurações para habilitar ou desabilitar a “tecnologia X3D” nesses modelos de CPU. A captura abaixo foi feita a partir do manual da ASUS Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE,…

[b2bcybersecurity]

AMD Prozessoren mit Sicherheitslücken

Nun scheint nach Intel auch AMD ein Problem mit Sicherheitslücken in Prozessoren zu haben. Eine AMD-Seite zählt 26 Prozessoren und Familien auf, die angreifbar sind. Der Schweregrad der Sicherheitslücke liegt nach CVSS bei 7.5 von 10 und ist somit hochgefährlich. Das erste Interview zum Thema Sicherheitslücken in aktuellen AMD-Prozessoren führte das Online-Magazin Wired. Sicherheitsforscher haben eine Sicherheitslücke entdeckt, die wohl seit Jahrzehnten in AMD-Prozessoren vorhanden ist. Diese Lücke kann es Malware ermöglichen ganz tief in den Speicher des PCs einzudringen und sich dort einzunisten. Laut den Forschern ist es dann günstiger die CPU auszutauschen oder den Rechner zu entsorgen, aber der Versuch ihn von der Malware zu reinigen. Dutzende Modelle von AMD-Prozessoren betroffen Auf der Hackerkonferenz Defcon wurde die Sicherheitslücke unter dem Namen "Sinkclose" vorgestellt. Dabei soll es möglich sein in einen bestimmten Speicherteil, der für die Firmware reserviert ist, Code zu platzieren. Die Forscher warnten zwar, dass alle AMD-Chips bis 2006 betroffen sein könnten, aber nun hat AMD eine eigene Liste veröffentlicht, auf der 26 Modelle und Familien genannt sind. Die Liste zählt neben alten Namen wie Athlon auch neuere Namen wie Threadripper und sehr viele Ryzen-Modelle auf. Kriminologen und Forscher haben die schlimme Befürchtung, dass insbesondere staatliche Hacker die Sicherheitslücke ausnutzen werden. Einige Prozessoren, wie AMD EPYC sind Rechenzentrumsprodukte und arbeiten dort für viele Server. Die Experten meinten auch, dass eine Entfernung einer Malware nur noch per hardwarebasierten Programmiertool namens SPI Flash Programmer möglich sei. Aber viele der Prozessoren stecken auch in Mitarbeiter-PCs in Unternehmen und KMU. Daher empfiehlt AMD das Update der Firmware um die Lücke zu schließen. Bei einigen Prozessoren und Familien ist das Update aber noch nicht fertig und sind für Oktober angekündigt. Die Updates kommen aber nicht von AMD, sondern von den PC-Herstellern. Red./sel   Passende Artikel zum Thema Lesen Sie den ganzen Artikel

[govindhtech]

Precision 7960 Tower & LLMs In Dell Precision Workstations

Precision 7960 Tower

Gaining an understanding of AI Precision Workstations and Large Language Models. Businesses can undergo a radical change by utilising the potential of huge language models on Precision workstations.

If any of the aforementioned circumstances apply to your intended AI application, there are a number of LLMs that may be utilized on-premises and tweaked utilising deskside workstations, most notably:

Gemma 7B, a condensed variant of Google’s Gemini, works well for compact and effective apps on smartphones with constrained processing power.

Llama 3 is ideal for large organizations and research because to its exceptional performance and versatility.

The Mistral series provides flexibility and customization for deployments that are affordable and is completely open source.

With better energy efficiency, lower costs, and improved scalability when working with multiple GPUs in tandem, the NVIDIA accelerated computing platform with NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture which includes NVIDIA RTX GPUs for training LLMs offers performance increases over earlier architectures in all categories.

Dell precision workstation

Dell Precision workstations, including the Precision 5860 Tower, Precision 7875 Tower, and Precision 7960 Tower, offer a multitude of single or dual processor configurations, memory configurations up to 4 TB, and the ability to configure single, dual, or up to quad NVIDIA RTX Ada Generation GPUs (systems vary on configuration options).

These desktop workstations will give you the capability to optimize LLMs using the model of your choosing while preserving data residency, privacy, and predictable costs.

Dell 5860, 7875, and 7960 Precision Workstations: Precision Power

Precision 5860 Tower, Precision 7875 Tower, and Precision 7960 Tower workstations manage the greatest computational and graphic demands. In addition to spacious single- or dual-processor configurations, they offer memory up to 4 TB and customizable NVIDIA RTX Ada Generation GPU configurations. Explore these cutting-edge workstations’ astonishing features and capabilities.

Precision 5860 Tower

Performance Unlock

Dell Precision 5860 Tower is powerful and expandable. Computationally intensive specialists who evaluate, render, and simulate complicated data would love this workstation.

Principal Elements

Processor Choices: With so many Intel Xeon processors available for the Precision 5860 Tower, you can customize the device to meet your unique requirements.

Graphics Abilities: This workstation offers unmatched graphics performance because it is outfitted with up to four NVIDIA RTX Ada Generation GPUs.

Memory Set Up: The Precision 5860 is capable of managing even the most complex multitasking situations because it supports up to 4 TB of RAM.

Storage Fixes: ensures rapid data access and plenty of storage space by providing a variety of storage solutions, including as high-capacity HDDs and NVMe SSDs.

Use cases and applications

The Precision 5860 is ideal for engineering, architecture, and media creation, where reliability and performance are essential. Experts love it because it handles large datasets, complex 3D models, and complex simulations easily.

Dell Precision 7875 Tower

Precision 7875 Tower

Dell Precision 7875 Tower pushes performance with its superior features and cutting-edge technology. This workstation targets power users who need the most processing and graphical power.

Principal Elements

Processor Power: Offers unrivalled multi-threaded performance and supports the newest AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO CPUs.

Excellence in Graphics: Equipped with up to four NVIDIA RTX Ada Generation GPUs, this configuration guarantees fluid and effective management of jobs requiring a lot of graphics.

Enormous Memory: Up to 4 TB of ECC memory can be installed, offering the dependability and efficiency necessary for vital workloads.

Storage Versatility: Offers a selection of fast and large capacity storage solutions, such as SATA HDDs and PCIe NVMe SSDs.

Use cases and applications

Applications involving AI and machine learning, high-end video editing, and virtual reality creation are all ideal for the Precision 7875. Strong CPUs and top-tier GPUs make complex processes and resource-intensive operations easy.

Dell Precision 7960 Tower

With maximum power and configurability, the Dell Precision 7960 Tower delivers the best workstation performance. This paradigm is designed for mission-critical, high-performance computation and graphics.

Principal Elements

Highest Processing Capacity: The Precision 7960 can handle even the most taxing applications because to its dual Intel Xeon Scalable CPUs.

Superb Graphics: Capable of supporting up to four NVIDIA RTX Ada Generation GPUs, offering exceptional graphical capabilities.

Broad Memory Support: Provides reliable multitasking and support for up to 4 TB of DDR4 ECC memory.

Various configurations, such as NVMe SSDs and SATA HDDs, are available for optimal speed and capacity in this extensive storage options package.

Use cases and applications

The preferred workstation for advanced engineering simulations, financial modelling, and scientific research is the Precision 7960. It can handle the most difficult and demanding computational jobs thanks to its unmatched power and versatility.

Configuring Memory

The Precision 7960 Tower supports memory-intensive programs and multitasking:

Up to 4 TB DDR4 ECC memory, 2933 MHz speed.

Eight-channel memory architecture support.

Advanced ECC memory for data security.

Storage Options

The workstation has flexible storage options for fast data access and enough of space:

Supports 12 drives

Storage options include PCIe NVMe SSDs for fast speeds and SATA HDDs for greater capacities.

RAID for data security and performance

Connectivity and Growth

Dell Precision 7960 Tower has many expansion and connectivity options:

Numerous PCIe 3.0 and 4.0 expansion card slots

Type-A and Type-C USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 ports

Two Gigabit Ethernet ports

Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1 options – Thunderbolt 3 for fast data transfer

Dell Endpoint Security

Optional Optional Chassis Intrusion Detection Smart Card Reader Dimensions and Weight The Precision 7960 Tower‘s dimensions make it ideal for professional use:

17.5 x 7.9 x 22.3 inches.

Beginning at 45 pounds

With a powerful power supply, the workstation handles power-hungry application.

In conclusion

Precision workstations like the 5860 Tower, 7875 Tower, and Precision 7960 Tower offer greater performance, durability, and scalability. For professionals who want the highest possible computational and graphical skills, they are the ideal option. These workstations are capable of handling the most demanding workloads and intricate jobs thanks to their adjustable features, which include memory up to 4 TB and single to quad GPUs.

Read more on govindhtedch.com

[phonemantra-blog]

Already next week The Starfield game, as you know, was created with the active support of AMD and works much better on Radeon video cards. However, owners of GeForce adapters will soon have a reason to rejoice, as DLSS will be added to the game. [caption id="attachment_78515" align="aligncenter" width="780"] AMD's[/caption] AMD's Starfield Game Will Get DLSS 3 Before FSR 3 Next week the developers will release a beta version of the update, which will bring many changes. True, it’s not very clear why the beta version, but we just have to wait for the release. Among other things, the update will bring support for DLSS, and judging by the mention of frame generation, it will be DLSS 3. Bethesda also promised to add FSR 3 to the game, that is, frame generation technology will become available for Radeon adapters. Considering that Starfield turned out to be very demanding, such improvements will clearly not be superfluous.

[omarvektrapc12]

Platform

Desktop

Product Family

AMD Ryzen™ PRO Processors

Product Line

AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ PRO 5000 WX-Series

AMD PRO Technologies

Yes

Consumer Use

No

Regional Availability

Global, China, NA, EMEA, APJ, LATAM

Former Codename

"Chagall PRO"

Architecture

"Zen 3"

# of CPU Cores

32

# of Threads

64

Max. Boost Clock

Up to 4.5GHz

Base Clock

3.6GHz

[teknolojihaber]

72 çekirdekli bir Nvidia işlemcisi AMD ve İntel'e kıyasla nasıl?

Nvidia'nın portföyünde yalnızca GPU'lar ve yapay zeka için özel hızlandırıcılar değil, aynı zamanda işlemciler de var. Ve şimdi 72 çekirdekli CPU Grace'i tüketici çözümleriyle karşılaştırma fırsatımız var. Arm mimarisini temel alan Nvidia sunucu işlemcisi Geekbench 5'te ortaya çıktı ve oldukça iyi bir sonuç gösterdi. Karşılaştırmada Grace, tek iş parçacıklı ve çok iş parçacıklı modlarda sırasıyla 1636 ve 74.440 puan aldı. Tek çekirdek performansı rekor kırmadı. Bu, Zen 3 mimarisindeki Ryzen 5000 seviyesinde ancak çoklu çekirdek oldukça etkileyici. Grace, çok fazla güç tüketen 56 çekirdekli Intel Xeon W9-3495X'ten biraz daha hızlı. Modern 96 çekirdekli Ryzen Threadripper 7995WX daha hızlı, ancak yalnızca oranında. Yani, Nvidia CPU, hem çok sayıda çekirdek hem de bunların oldukça modern Neoverse N2 çekirdekleri olması nedeniyle çok çok yüksek performansa sahip olabilir. Read the full article

[sanaavay]

Nzxt Kraken X63 ARGB (Black) AIO Liquid Cooler Nzxt Kraken X63 ARGB (Black) AIO Liquid Cooler is a stunning must-have for any build with the addition of NZXT RGB fans. With a re-designed cap and larger infinity mirror ring LED, the Kraken X63 RGB delivers an amazing experience in luminous liquid cooling, backed by a 6-year warranty. Install your pump in any orientation and rotate the NZXT logo to match Includes an NZXT RGB connector for compatibility with our Aer RGB 2 fans or NZXT RGB accessories All-new 7th Gen Asetek pump providing better cooling and 800RPM whisper-quiet performance Improved synchronization of lighting modes across other NZXT RGB accessories NZXT CAM-controlled pump and lighting effects Easier installation with reinforced extended tubing (400mm) AER RGB 2 140mm included*Fan control is not included with the Kraken X-3 series Nzxt Kraken X63 ARGB (Black) AIO Liquid Cooler Specifications Water Block Dimensions: Diameter: 80mm; H: 55mm Material: Block: copper; Housing: plastic Pump Motor Speed: 800 – 2,800 + 300 RPM Power: 12VDC, 0.3A Radiator Dimensions: 123 x 275 x 30mm Material: Aluminum Tube Length: 400mm Material: Ultra-low evaporation rubber with nylon braided sleeve Cap Material: Plastic and brass Rotation Orientation: 360° with 30° increments LEDs: 9 LEDs NZXT RGB Channel Output Voltage: 5V DC NZXT RGB Channel Output LED Qty.: Up to four LED strips – 10 LEDs per strip, Up to five Aer RGB fans, Up to six NZXT RGB accessories Fans Model: Aer RGB 2 140 Quantity: 2 Dimensions: 140 x 140 x 26mm Speed: 500 – 1,500 + 300 RPM Air Flow: 30.39 – 91.19 CFM Air Pressure: 0.17 – 1.52mm-H2O Noise: 22-33dBA Bearing: Fluid dynamic bearing Power Consumption: 12V DC, 0.32A, 3.8W Connector: 4-pin PWM Compatible Socket & CPU Intel Socket LGA 1200, 1151, 1150, 1155, 1156, 1366, 2011, 2011-3, 2066 Intel Core i9 / Core i7 / Core i5 / Core i3 / Pentium / Celeron AMD Socket AM4, sTRX4*, TR4* (*Threadripper bracket not included) AMD Ryzen 9 / Ryzen 7 / Ryzen 5 / Ryzen 3 / Threadripper Model Number RL-KRX63-R1 Warranty 6 Years Special Note *Threadripper bracket is not included Note ***Features,Price and Specifications are subject to change without notice.

[itgurublog]

How to Choose the Best Processor for Your Laptop or Computer

Choosing the right processor for your laptop or computer can be a daunting task, especially with the myriad of options available in the market today. The processor, often referred to as the CPU (Central Processing Unit), is the brain of your computer. It determines how fast your machine can perform tasks and handle applications. In this guide, we'll walk you through everything you need to know to make an informed decision and choose the best processor for your needs.

Understanding the Basics: What is a Processor?

A processor is a small chip that sits inside your computer and carries out instructions from programs by performing basic arithmetic, logic, control, and input/output operations specified by the instructions. Essentially, the processor's performance impacts almost every aspect of your computer's speed and capability.

Key Factors to Consider

When selecting a processor, there are several key factors you should consider to ensure you get the best performance for your needs:

1. Usage Needs

Your specific needs will largely determine the type of processor you should get. Here’s a breakdown of different use cases:

Basic Use (Web Browsing, Office Applications): If you primarily use your computer for tasks like web browsing, email, and office applications (Word, Excel), you won't need a high-end processor. An Intel Core i3 or AMD Ryzen 3 should suffice.

Multitasking and Multimedia (Photo Editing, Streaming): For more demanding tasks such as photo editing, streaming, and running multiple applications simultaneously, consider an Intel Core i5 or AMD Ryzen 5.

Gaming and Content Creation (Video Editing, 3D Rendering): Gamers and content creators need more power. High-performance processors like Intel Core i7/i9 or AMD Ryzen 7/9 are better suited for these tasks.

Professional Workstations (Software Development, Data Analysis): For professional-grade applications and heavy multitasking, you might need Intel Xeon or AMD Threadripper processors.

2. Core Count and Threads

Cores: Modern processors come with multiple cores, which are essentially individual processing units within the CPU. More cores allow your computer to handle more tasks simultaneously. For example, a quad-core processor has four cores.

Threads: Threads are the virtual version of cores and represent the number of tasks a CPU can handle at once. A processor with hyper-threading (Intel) or simultaneous multithreading (AMD) can handle more threads than its core count. For instance, a quad-core processor with hyper-threading can handle eight threads.

3. Clock Speed

Clock speed, measured in gigahertz (GHz), indicates how many cycles a processor can perform per second. Higher clock speeds generally mean faster performance, but this isn’t the only factor. A higher clock speed in a more efficient architecture can outperform a higher speed in an older architecture.

4. Cache Size

Cache is a small amount of very fast memory located on the CPU. It stores frequently accessed data and instructions to speed up processing. Larger caches can improve performance, especially in tasks that require a lot of repetitive actions.

5. Thermal Design Power (TDP)

TDP, measured in watts, indicates the amount of heat a CPU generates under maximum load. Lower TDP means less heat and potentially quieter cooling solutions, while higher TDP indicates better performance but may require more robust cooling.

6. Integrated Graphics

If you don't plan on using a separate graphics card, you’ll want a processor with strong integrated graphics. Intel’s processors with Intel Iris Plus Graphics and AMD’s Ryzen APUs with Radeon Graphics offer good performance for light gaming and multimedia tasks.

Popular Processor Families

Intel Processors

Intel Core i3: Entry-level, good for basic tasks.

Intel Core i5: Mid-range, suitable for most users.

Intel Core i7: High-end, great for gaming and content creation.

Intel Core i9: Top-of-the-line, for the most demanding applications.

Intel Xeon: Designed for workstations and servers, excellent for professional use.

AMD Processors

AMD Ryzen 3: Entry-level, similar to Intel Core i3.

AMD Ryzen 5: Mid-range, competitive with Intel Core i5.

AMD Ryzen 7: High-end, comparable to Intel Core i7.

AMD Ryzen 9: Enthusiast level, rivals Intel Core i9.

AMD Threadripper: Extremely powerful, for professional and heavy-duty tasks.

Intel vs. AMD: Which to Choose?

The Intel vs. AMD debate is ongoing, but both brands offer excellent processors. Your choice may come down to specific use cases, budget, and personal preference:

Intel: Known for strong single-core performance and higher clock speeds. Intel processors are often favored for gaming and applications that rely heavily on single-thread performance.

AMD: Offers excellent multi-core performance and value for money. AMD Ryzen processors have become very popular for multitasking, productivity, and gaming, often providing more cores and threads at a lower price point compared to Intel.

Future-Proofing Your Purchase

When investing in a processor, consider future-proofing to ensure your system remains relevant for several years. Here are some tips:

Go for More Cores and Threads: As software becomes more advanced, it increasingly takes advantage of multiple cores and threads.

Higher Clock Speeds: While not the only factor, a higher clock speed can help keep your system running smoothly for longer.

Newer Architectures: Choose processors based on the latest architectures, as they offer better performance and efficiency.

Upgradability: Ensure your motherboard supports potential future upgrades to avoid needing a complete overhaul.

Conclusion

Choosing the best processor for your laptop or computer involves understanding your specific needs, comparing core counts, clock speeds, and other specifications, and considering your budget. Whether you lean towards Intel or AMD, there are excellent options available across all price points. By keeping the factors discussed in this guide in mind, you can make an informed decision and enjoy optimal performance from your new computer.

for more information and download software visit our website https://www.itgurublog.com

[whiteguyswearinoculusrifts]

A CPU Ryzen Threadripper 7995WX da AMD é uma besta de chip, quebrando recordes de desempenho multi-threaded, mas também possui capacidades de computação FP32 surpreendentemente altas que estão no mesmo nível de algumas das GPUs mais populares do mercado e mais rápidas do que os consoles de jogos mais recentes. A CPU AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX tem impressionantes capacidades de computação FP32: mais TFLOPs do que os consoles Xbox Series X e PS5 O AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO oferece 96 núcleos, 192 threads, 384 MB de cache L3 e tem velocidades de clock de até 5,15 GHz em um pacote TDP de 350W. Embora o chip seja projetado para estações de trabalho e PCs desktop de última geração, parece que o chip também pode oferecer alguns recursos decentes de emulação de software diretamente da CPU. Nas métricas de desempenho do chip compartilhado no Github (via @InstLatX64), podemos ver que o chip oferece até 12,16 TFLOPs de FP32 (precisão única) e 6,0 TFLOPs de desempenho de computação FP64 (precisão dupla) dentro do benchmark AIDA64 GPGPU. O benchmark usa um código de máquina x64 nativo e não deve ser comparado aos benchmarks de GPU que usam a API OpenCL e destinam-se exclusivamente a estudos comparativos. Uma CPU Intel Core i9-13900K oferece tapume de 2,5 TFLOPs de desempenho FP32, logo você obtém quase 5x a melhoria com o Threadripper 7995WX. Manadeira da imagem: Github Mas vamos passar para a segmento mais divertida que é uma confrontação com os consoles de jogos da geração atual da Microsoft e da Sony. O PlayStation 5 oferece um pico de computação FP32 de 10,29 TFLOPs, enquanto o Xbox Series X oferece até 12,15 TFLOPs de computação. A CPU AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX não exclusivamente está avante de ambos os consoles de jogos em termos de TFLOPs brutos, mas está quase no mesmo nível da NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 (12,7 TFLOPs), a GPU mais popular na Pesquisa de Hardware do Steam. Isso é um pouco realmente impressionante e com a quantidade de poder de computação que a CPU AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX é capaz de oferecer, poderemos vê-lo rodar o Crysis sozinho na CPU em um horizonte próximo. Uma coisa que esses benchmarks deixaram evidente é que não há outra CPU na indústria que corresponda às proezas e capacidades do 7995WX e das CPUs Ryzen Threadripper 7000 com Zen 4 em universal. Esses chips são a solução definitiva para geração de teor, IA, renderização e qualquer forma de tarefas multithreading. Manadeira de notícias: HXL (@9550pro) Compartilhe esta história Facebook Twitter