#Theres actually a big pattern of leftist principles that are expressed entirely in what we dont want instead of what we want | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

vanilla-voyeur · 1 year ago

Text

I don't agree with defund the police or ACAB

Or at least I don't agree with the terms. The underlying message is good. The problem with these terms is that they obscure what we really mean in a way that makes us look more unreasonable than we really are.

Take "defund the police". What we really mean is "fund social services". @theabigailthorn made a video on policing in the UK that shows that regardless of whether the police budgets are cut under Austerity or whether police budgets balloon out of proportion like in the US, the outcome is a shitty system so long as funding for social services is low. Without funding to social services, the police wear too many hats. There is no possible way that one single group can handle all the different problems we place on the heads of the police. And that's completely ignoring that they're a white supremacist agent of state violence. Tbh when I first heard about "defund the police" I mistakenly thought that it was supposed to be some sort of punishment for the police being racist. On its surface, that sounds like the wrong approach. I'm pretty confident that that reading is what many conservatives take away when they hear "defund the police".

And then there's "ACAB". What we really mean is that "all cops are complicit" or "good cops don't last". I can't stand when people smugly say that of course ACAB is obviously not literal. If you expect the group that thinks we're all batshit insane and wholly divorced from reality for the most common sense takes to parse the nuance behind the blanket statement then you're batshit insane and wholly divorced from reality.

This is not even a bad optics argument. This is why in the heck are we spreading misinformation about our own dang beliefs that make us sound completely unreasonable.

#Acab #defund the police #Every time I bring this up some Very Good Reader accuses me of bootlicking #Theres actually a big pattern of leftist principles that are expressed entirely in what we dont want instead of what we want #Even things that are actually true things we want to abolish end up sounding bad because we never explain what we want to replace it with #Abolish prisons. And replace it with what?#Abolish the nuclear family. And replace it with what?#Expecting people to read theory to understand what youre proposing to add when #theyve already dismissed your position as unhinged is preposterous #Anarchism is another example but I think its too entrenched a name to go back on #Lets define everything bad that we hate about government into this seperate term called the State and then say we want to abolish the State #Look at these dumb idiots who dont realize that anarchy does not mean chaos. Read theory dumb dumb #And then theres the claim of abolishing unjust hierarchies #Unjust is a weasel word #Its trying to square the ideal of abolishing all hierarchies with the reality that thats impossible #Unjust according to whom?#Conservatives think every hierarchy we have today is just #In fact we're missing a few just hierarchies that we need to throw in #Tbh I have some anarchist sympathies #I keep trying to join the local anarchist group but havent been able to go to many meetings due to bad brains #But at this point Im more willing to adopt an anarchist political position than I would be to adopt the anarchist label #Maybe lets try to be a little less 3edgy5you about perfectly reasonable political positions

3 notes · View notes