#The thing that historically put me off this headcanon (and why I still tread lightly) was running into fans who used it in a gatekeepy way
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
threewaysdivided · 3 years ago
Note
How do you feel about the trans Danny headcanon? Not in terms of Deathly Weapons, just in general.
As a headcanon itself? I don’t personally go for it but I can see where it comes from, and I’m glad it brings people joy.
Like I mentioned in my DP & Asexuality meta-post, Danny’s half-ghost status can read as broad allegory for a bunch of potential experiences including various flavours of LGBT+ and neurodiversity. Add to that DP/FOP’s somewhat iffy tendency to use male femininity and emasculation as both punchline and source of character embarrassment for “comedy” such as it is and it’s not really surprising that both shows sometimes go tripping tail-over-teakettle right across the line into accidental-queer-coding.
That’s about as much as I can say on this one, since it isn’t a headcanon I tend to actively seek out. Baby 3WD had the misfortune to stumble into the Phandom at a time when some of the most popular circulating posts on the topic were people insisting that the interpretation “is canon” (with a very loud subtext that anyone who disagreed even slightly was an evil terrible transphobe), heavily cherry-picking the show to “prove” it, and seemingly taking glee in the idea that the headcanon would “ruin cis people’s childhoods” or make them uncomfortable, which just… seemed like a vaguely gatekeep-y, kind of mean, sort of disingenuous attitude towards fandom that I didn’t and still don’t particularly vibe with.
But, as it turns out, that's not representative of the headcanon at all! I’ve since met some really lovely users, seen some great meta-analysis about trans/queer readings of canon, and there some fantastic stories exploring the trans experience and the way being trans would alter Danny’s character and relationships. It’s kind of a universal law of the internet that even the most chill and non-toxic fandoms must be at least 5% tyre-fire by volume... and it’s just unfortunate that I happened to land right in the middle of a tyre-fire whose first impression has left me leery of wading too deep into that particular pool.
As for my own writing… I’m an asexual cis-woman whose interests lean more towards character psychology, self-esteem/self-love, platonic relationships and dealing with loss. I almost never have strong feelings or headcanons about the sexuality or gender identity (or even shipping) of characters - I kind of prefer to just take them at their word based on what they say/ show us in the story. (The only time it gets my back up is when I feel like a paid official creator is being exploitative/ dishonest/ disrespectful with their representation.)
In canon Danny identifies as male and is identified by the rest of the cast as male (even if sometimes he seems to struggle with feeling like he doesn’t live up to the “ideal of manliness” which honestly is a load of toxic bunk anyway) so I write him as a cis-guy.
Would I personally write a trans-headcanon story? Probably not. Like I said, I’m cis and - while I can listen to and sympathise with the experiences of trans people - I don’t feel like that would be my story to tell and (while I would do my best to research and be respectful if handed a canonically trans character) I wouldn’t feel confident enough in my ability to respectfully handle it to voluntarily take on that task. Especially since - when it comes to these kinds of transformative headcanons - I would personally want a story to explore how that change changes the character(s).
If someone else wants to write fic/ meta or otherwise make the case that a particular relationship or a specific queer/ cultural/ religious interpretation or reading of the text would be narratively compelling or offer interesting insights then I’m happy to hear them out. But honestly it’s just not something that I actively go looking for.
Basically, so long as people are being kind and respectful to others and doing what makes them happy then go forth and prosper with my blessing.
#Danny Phantom#Headcanons#3WD Answers#sorry if that's not a satisfying answer#But yeah#So long as you're being kind and constructive with it any headcanon is fine#Do not let me or any other fan be the arbiter of whether your thoughts/ feelings on something are valid#this is basically just a remix of the PinkAstronaut question I suppose#I'm really unhelpful when it comes to these kind of shipping and identity headcanons#here's my take as a white cis-person:#It's NOT about me#whatever my feelings are they are a Me Problem that I am responsible for dealing with#whether that's checking myself/ remembering to shut up and Listen/ working to unpack my uncomfortable sh*t IRL#Or responsibly using the back/ block/ filter buttons to curate my personal experiences in fandom#I am allowed to have personal opinions on the handling of these topics in media#but mine should not be the loudest voice in those conversations#and - frankly - no-one really has a right to gatekeep fandom for other people#least of all me#The thing that historically put me off this headcanon (and why I still tread lightly) was running into fans who used it in a gatekeepy way#Gatekeeping and trying to enforce a 'one true reading' are fandom behaviours I Categorically Dislike even when attached to progressive ideas#That's not to say that communities shouldn't self-moderate actual bad behaviour (bigotry/ harassment / plagiarism/ general toxicity)#But gainsaying another person's intentions to exclude/ shame them over a different interpretation of a fictional text is... unproductive#I tend to call that behaviour 'spite-canon-ing': where people seem to enjoy a thing more because it angers/offends/upsets someone else#than they do spending time talking about why that thing is something they like/ find valuable/ find resonant/ find important#And again: that's not on the headcanon itself - it's on the small minority of fans who chose to engage with fandom that way#So yeah#Headcanon? Fine. Canonicty? Deeply unlikely. Valid reading anyway? 100% if it brings you joy. Personal feelings on it? *Eh*#queer#anonymous
20 notes · View notes