#Thales took possession of Arundel only after the Insurrection
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Note
Hi, i have seen you and some other posters talking about how Edelgard father was a puppet or working for the Agarthans and i was wondering do you have links or pictures that shows thos as i dont really have access to my game to check and im not sure where to het that kind of information from.
Sorry for any inconvenience or of i got the worng person.
No pbs anon !
Hubert explains it here :
So per Hubert, Ionius was used as a puppet by Thales'n'pals and Thales'n'pals were the ones who experimented on her siblings!
I believe Her Majesty may have told you some of this herself.
Interestingly, while she told some stuff to Billy, she told them that it wasn't Uncle'n'pals who did the experiments... but Aegir who is canonically (per Ferdie's paralogue) Thales' prefered scapegoat.
Who also blames Aegir for what happened to her? Ionius himself!
When you were stolen away to the Kingdom... When the prime minister did those horrible things... I could only watch in horror.
So, on the one hand, we have Ionius and Supreme Leader blaming Aegir for the experiments and eluding the Agarthans -
On the other hand, we have Hubert blaming the Agarthans for the experiments as he reveals Ionius was their puppet, something Supreme Leader already knows (and apparently should have told Billy!)...
Between those two sources and facts, which one is the most trustworthy?
I'd say Hubert in a heartbeat - given how he has no reason to lie here, Aegir was already put under house arrest, so why "not blaming" him and instead pinning everything on the Agarthans ?
Unless... Aegir had no part in the experiments, only in the Insurrection, and when Arundel was slithere'd upon returning from Faerghus - after Solon got "acceptable results" in Ordelia - and started the experiments on the Hresvelg kids.
What was Ionius doing meanwhile? We don't know.
FE Fodlan refuses to give us more details about the Insurrection and the experiments on the Hresvelg children, we can only suppose things.
Ionius being a puppet of Arun-Thales and foddering children to get a "peerless emperor" is nothing but headcanon, and yet, it somehow fits with Vestra Sr, Hubert's own dad, rebelling against Ionius to protect - it's heavily implied - kid!Hubert himself. Volkhard (the real one!) hid his niece in Faerghus... for reasons? Why hiding her there - if she wasn't at risk in Enbarr? And who would have been targeting her ? The experiments didn't start, and given how the members of the Insurrection were happy to let Ionius alive (albeit as a figurehead), they would have had no interest in killing the Imperial children.
Again, it's all hc created from Hubert's support with Hanneman and this very own line, coming from Hubert himself : the games gives us two different narratives and leave it at that.
Per the Hresvelgs : Aegir led the experiments.
Per Hubert - backed up by Lysithea's background : Agarthans did it, and manipulated Ionius.
Who's right ? Canon says "dunno".
#anon#replies#FE16#Adrestia stuff#is it the ionius hour?#we don't a thing about johnny#was he only there to salt or did he have power and decided to do some very stupid and disturbing things?#he was in power when Ordelia was Agarthan'd#he was the one in charge when House Martritz disappeared and House Nuvelle was reduced to nothing#we knew he tried to centralise policies on himself#but otherwise? He's just there#was he always manipulated by agarthans?#Thales took possession of Arundel only after the Insurrection#given how nopes wrote Fodlan it's always agarthan influence#but between Hubert and Supreme Leader I'd say the one who is the most honest with Billy#is surprisingly Hubert in Tru Piss
20 notes
·
View notes