#Telepsychiatry Services Baltimore
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
accesshealthservices · 1 year ago
Text
Psychiatry Services | Psychiatric Diagnosis And Different.
Tumblr media
A psychiatric diagnosis is different – there are often no physical symptoms, nor are there any biological tests conclusive for mental distress. Although tests can be important to rule out underlying physical causes, a health professional making a psychiatric diagnosis has to rely on a person’s own description of their thoughts and feelings, alongside observations of their behavior.
In this sense, it is often said that those best placed to make a diagnosis are the people themselves, supported by information and empowered discussion with health care professionals.
Access Health Services Psychiatric Diagnosis
0 notes
skaddy111 · 6 months ago
Text
Welcome to Maryland Telepsychiatry: Your Trusted Partner for Mental Health Care
At Maryland Telepsychiatry, we are dedicated to providing high-quality, accessible, and comprehensive mental health care. Our team of experienced psychiatrists and mental health professionals is committed to helping you achieve and maintain optimal mental well-being. We understand that seeking psychiatric care can be a daunting experience, which is why we strive to make the process as comfortable and convenient as possible. Through our innovative telepsychiatry services, we bring top-notch mental health care directly to you, no matter where you are.
Our Services
Online Psychiatrist: Maryland Telepsychiatry offers the convenience of online consultations with experienced psychiatrists. Our online psychiatrist services are designed to provide you with the same level of care and attention that you would receive in a traditional office setting, but from the comfort of your own home. Whether you need a diagnosis, medication management, or therapy, our online psychiatrists are here to help. We use secure, HIPAA-compliant platforms to ensure your privacy and confidentiality.
Baltimore Psychiatrist: For residents of Baltimore and surrounding areas, Maryland Telepsychiatry is your local solution for mental health care. Our Baltimore psychiatrists are familiar with the unique challenges and needs of the community. By choosing a Baltimore psychiatrist through our telepsychiatry services, you gain access to local experts who understand the regional context and can provide culturally sensitive care. We offer flexible scheduling to accommodate your busy lifestyle, making it easier than ever to get the help you need.
Online Psychiatrist That Takes Insurance: We believe that mental health care should be accessible to everyone, which is why Maryland Telepsychiatry works with a variety of insurance providers. Finding an online psychiatrist that takes insurance can be challenging, but we are committed to simplifying the process for you. Our team will help verify your insurance coverage and assist with any necessary paperwork, so you can focus on your treatment without worrying about financial barriers. We accept most major insurance plans, ensuring that high-quality mental health care is within reach.
Why Choose Maryland Telepsychiatry?
Expert Care: Our team of board-certified psychiatrists and licensed mental health professionals brings a wealth of experience and expertise to every consultation. We stay updated with the latest advancements in psychiatry to provide evidence-based treatments that are tailored to your individual needs. Whether you’re dealing with depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, or any other mental health condition, you can trust our experts to deliver compassionate and effective care.
Convenience: Telepsychiatry offers unparalleled convenience for our patients. No more commuting to appointments or sitting in waiting rooms. With Maryland Telepsychiatry, you can schedule and attend your sessions from any location with internet access. Our user-friendly platform makes it easy to connect with your psychiatrist, and our flexible scheduling options mean you can find a time that fits your busy life.
Confidentiality: We understand the importance of privacy in mental health care. Maryland Telepsychiatry uses secure, encrypted communication channels to ensure that your personal information and medical records are protected. Our commitment to confidentiality means you can speak freely with your psychiatrist, knowing that your privacy is always respected.
Accessibility: Mental health care should be available to everyone, regardless of their location or circumstances. Our telepsychiatry services break down barriers to care by providing access to high-quality psychiatric services anywhere in Maryland. Whether you live in a remote area or have mobility issues, you can receive the care you need without the added stress of travel.
0 notes
chocolategifts · 2 years ago
Text
The Most Influential Psychiatric Thinker of All Time: Brain Cooke
Dramatic alterations in theoretical conceptualization are only one aspect of psychiatry's rich and intriguing history; another is the wide range of people who have contributed to the field's growth. In this way, a complete study of psychiatric history necessitates not just a grasp of theory but also of the unique individuals who shaped the concepts that have come to define our perception of mental disease.
Psychiatrist: Who Are They?
An expert in the identification and management of mental diseases is a psychiatrist. Depression, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, eating disorders, and substance addiction issues are a few examples of them, but they are not the only ones. Chronic physical conditions with mental symptoms are another condition that psychiatrists can treat. (like diabetes or heart disease). Researchers who specialize in mental diseases include some psychiatrists.
Dr. Cooke is a board-certified psychiatrist with particular expertise in the identification and management of mental health issues like anxiety, depression, and other mood disorders. He focuses on telemedicine visits, which he discovers people value for the ease and adaptability that let them get care wherever they are. Additionally board-certified in forensic psychology, he offers assessments for a variety of legal reasons.
His favorite aspect of practicing psychiatry is listening to his patients since it enables him to collaborate with them and develop a treatment strategy. He has witnessed firsthand how untreated mental illness symptoms can negatively impact a person's overall health. Helping patients get well and resume regular functioning amazes him.
Dr. Brian Cooke sees the connection between a doctor and patient as a team effort. According to him, this is the cornerstone of clinical treatment and can significantly affect a patient's ability to heal and find respite from pain. He can inform patients about their treatment alternatives thanks to his excellent academic background and help with them to change for the better.
He acknowledges that not all patients may react to medicine alone or may have negative effects despite his concentration on telepsychiatry and therapies including pharmaceuticals. For the suitable individuals, he believes that TMS (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) and esketamine nasal spray are two viable treatments for depression.
 Membership
The American Psychiatric Association and the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law both recognize him as a member.
Individual Interests
Dr. Cooke, his wife, and their two boys reside in Atlanta, Georgia. He likes tennis, hiking, and jogging. The family enjoys visiting different locations and learning about diverse cultures. He also wants to learn how to play chess.
Knowledge & Experience
In Davidson, North Carolina, at Davidson College, Dr. Cooke earned his Bachelor of Science degree. He graduated from Saint Louis University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri, with a medical degree. At the University of Maryland/Sheppard Pratt in Baltimore, Maryland, he finished his psychiatric residency. In addition to other locations, the programme offered training at the University of Maryland Medical Center, which saw a wide variety of patients from all around the state. He saw patients at the geriatric psychiatry unit, the general adult inpatient unit, and the unit for children and adolescents. In addition, he offered outpatient care in neighborhood clinics. In addition, he received training at Sheppard Pratt Hospital, which had four general adult inpatient units, a trauma disorders unit, an eating disorders unit, a child and adolescent inpatient service, adult and child neuropsychiatric units, a psychotic disorders unit, a co-occurring unit, outpatient clinics, services for geriatric psychiatry and chemical dependency, a general adult day hospital, and several specialty day hospitals. Mercy Medical Center, the State Mental Hygiene Administration System, and the Baltimore VA Hospital were among the other clinical care rotations. He had a leadership and managerial position as chief resident in his fourth year. Awards given out were the Dr. George U. Bali's Award for Excellence in Medical Student Education and the Irving J. Taylor Award for Outstanding Resident Research.
The Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut is where he finished his Fellowship in Forensic Psychiatry, where he gained knowledge of the intricate interplay of psychiatry, law, ethics, and public policy. It provided him with a well-rounded training experience, with specific strengths in the fields of criminal law, forensic psychiatry in the public sector, and research.
He went to Gainesville, Florida, where for more than 10 years he served as a professor at the University of Florida College of Medicine. He attended to patients with a range of mental illnesses throughout that period in the hospital and psychiatry clinic. In addition, he instructed advanced forensic fellows, law students, nursing students, and students studying medicine and law. He received several Exemplary Teacher Awards, the William "Buck" Ruffin Best Teach Award, and other honors.
He was most recently an Associate Professor in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences on the faculty of the Emory University School of Medicine. Serving as the Medical Director of the Emory/Fulton County Jail Competency Restoration Program and Associate Training Director of the Forensic Psychiatry Fellowship were two other leadership positions. At the Emory Health Clinic, he also offered psychiatric services.
0 notes
stephenmccull · 3 years ago
Text
Telehealth’s Limits: Battle Over State Lines and Licensing Threatens Patients’ Options
If you live in one state, does it matter that the doctor treating you online is in another? Surprisingly, the answer is yes, and the ability to conduct certain virtual appointments may be nearing an end.
Televisits for medical care took off during the worst days of the pandemic, quickly becoming commonplace. Most states and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services temporarily waived rules requiring licensed clinicians to hold a valid license in the state where their patient is located. Those restrictions don’t keep patients from visiting doctors’ offices in other states, but problems could arise if those same patients used telemedicine.
Now states are rolling back many of those pandemic workarounds.
Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore, for example, recently scrambled to notify more than 1,000 Virginia patients that their telehealth appointments were “no longer feasible,” said Dr. Brian Hasselfeld, medical director of digital health and telemedicine at Johns Hopkins. Virginia is among the states where the emergency orders are expiring or being rolled back.
At least 17 states still have waivers in effect, according to a tracker maintained by the Alliance for Connected Care, a lobbying group representing insurers, tech companies and pharmacies.
As those rules end, “it risks increasing barriers” to care, said Hasselfeld. Johns Hopkins, he added, hosted more than 1 million televisits, serving more than 330,000 unique patients, since the pandemic began. About 10% of those visits were from states where Johns Hopkins does not operate facilities.
The rollbacks come amid a longer and larger debate over states’ authority around medical licensing that the pandemic — with its widespread adoption of telehealth services — has put front and center.
“Consumers don’t know about these regulations, but if you all of a sudden pull the rug out from these services, you will definitely see a consumer backlash,” said Dr. Harry Greenspun, chief medical officer for the consultancy Guidehouse.
Still, finding a way forward pits high-powered stakeholders against one another, and consumers’ input is likely to be muted.
State medical boards don’t want to cede authority, saying their power to license and discipline medical professionals boosts patient safety. Licensing is also a source of state revenue.
Providers have long been split on whether to change cross-state licensing rules. Different state requirements — along with fees — make it cumbersome and expensive for doctors, nurses and other clinicians to get licenses in multiple states, leading to calls for more flexibility. Even so, those efforts have faced pushback from within the profession, with opposition from other clinicians who fear the added competition that could come from telehealth could lead to losing patients or jobs.
“As with most things in medicine, it’s a bottom-line issue. The reason telehealth has been blocked across state lines for many years related fundamentally to physicians wanting to protect their own practices,” said Greenspun.
But the pandemic changed the equation.
Even though the initial spike in telehealth visits has eased, utilization remains 38 times higher than before the pandemic, attracting not only patients, but also venture capitalists seeking to join the hot business opportunity, according to a report from consulting firm McKinsey and Co.
Patients’ experience with televisits coupled with the growing interest by investors is focusing attention on this formerly inside-baseball issue of cross-state licensing.
Greenspun predicts consumers will ultimately drive the solution by “voting with their wallets,” aided by giant, consumer-focused retailers like Amazon and Walmart, both of which in recent months made forays into telemedicine.
In the short term, however, the focus is on both the protections and the barriers state regulations create.
“The whole challenge is to ensure maximum access to health while assuring quality,” said Barak Richman, a Duke University law professor, who said laws and policies haven’t been updated to reflect new technological realities partly because state boards want to hang onto their authority.
Patients and their doctors are getting creative, with some consumers simply driving across state lines, then making a Zoom call from their vehicle.
“It’s not ideal, but some patients say they are willing to drive a mile or two and sit in a parking lot in a private space and continue to get my care,” said Dr. Shabana Khan, director of telepsychiatry at NYU Langone Health’s department of child and adolescent psychiatry and a member of the American Psychiatric Association’s Telepsychiatry Committee. She and other practitioners ask their patients about their locations, mainly for safety reasons, but also to check that they are in-state.
Still, for some patients, driving to another state for an in-person or even a virtual appointment is not an option.
Khan worries about people whose care is interrupted by the changes, especially those reluctant to seek out new therapists or who cannot find any clinicians taking new patients.
Austin Smith hopes that doesn’t happen to him.
After initial treatment for what he calls a “weird flavor of cancer” didn’t help reduce his gastrointestinal stromal tumors, he searched out other experts, landing in a clinical trial. But it was in San Diego and the 28-year-old salesman lives in Phoenix.
Although he drives more than five hours each way every couple of months for treatment and to see his doctors, he does much of his other follow-up online. The only difference is “if I was in person, and I said I was hurting here, the doctor could poke me,” he said.
And if the rules change? He’ll make the drive. “I’ll do anything to beat this,” he said of his cancer.
But will doctors, whose patients have spent the past year or more growing comfortable with virtual visits, also be willing to take steps that could likely involve extra costs and red tape?
To get additional licenses, for instance, practitioners must submit applications in every state where their patients reside, each of which can take weeks or months to process. They must pay application fees and keep up with a range of requirements such as continuing education, which vary by state.
States say their traditional role as overseer ensures that all applicants meet educational requirements and pass background checks. They also investigate complaints and argue there’s an advantage to keeping local officials in charge.
“It’s closer to home,” said Lisa Robin, chief advocacy officer with the Federation of State Medical Boards. “There’s a remedy for residents of the state with their own state officials.”
Doctor groups such as the American Medical Association agree.
Allowing a change that doesn’t put centralized authority in a patient’s home state would raise “serious enforcement issues as states do not have interstate policing authority and cannot investigate incidents that happen in another state,” said then-AMA President-elect Jack Resneck during a congressional hearing in March.
But others want more flexibility and say it can be done safely.
Hasselfeld, at Johns Hopkins, said there is precedent for easing multistate licensing requirements. The Department of Veterans Affairs, for example, allows medical staffers who are properly licensed in at least one state to treat patients in any VA facility.
The Alliance for Connected Care and other advocates are pushing states to extend their pandemic rules. A few have done so. Arizona, for example, made permanent the rules allowing out-of-state medical providers to practice telemedicine for Arizona residents, as long as they register with the state and their home-state license is in good standing. Connecticut’s similar rules have now been stretched until June 2023.
The alliance and others also back legislation stalled in Congress that would temporarily allow medical professionals licensed in one state to treat — either in person or via televisits — patients in any other state.
Because such fixes are controversial, voluntary interstate pacts have gained attention. Several already exist: one each for nurses, doctors, physical therapists and psychologists. Proponents say they are a simple way to ensure state boards retain authority and high standards, while making it easier for licensed medical professionals to expand their geographic range.
The nurses’ compact, enacted by 37 states and Guam, allows registered nurses with a valid license in one state to have it recognized by all the others in the pact.
A different kind of model is the Interstate Physician Licensure Compact, which has been enacted by 33 states, plus the District of Columbia and Guam, and has issued more than 21,000 licenses since it began in 2017, said Robin, of the Federation of State Medical Boards.
While it speeds the paperwork process, it does not eliminate the cost of applying for licenses in each state.
The compact simplifies the process by having the applicant physician’s home state confirm his or her eligibility and perform a criminal background check. If the applicant is eligible, the home state sends a letter of qualification to the new state, which then issues a license, Robin said. Physicians must meet all rules and laws in each state, such as requirements for continuing medical education. Additionally, they cannot have a history of disciplinary actions or currently be under investigation.
“It’s a fairly high bar,” said Robin.
Such compacts — especially if they are bolstered by new legislation at the federal level — could help the advances in telehealth made during the pandemic stick around for good, expanding access to care for both mental health services and medical care across the U.S. “What’s at stake if we get this right,” said Richman at Duke, “is making sure we have an innovative marketplace that fully uses virtual technology and a regulatory system that encourages competition and quality.”
KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. Together with Policy Analysis and Polling, KHN is one of the three major operating programs at KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). KFF is an endowed nonprofit organization providing information on health issues to the nation.
USE OUR CONTENT
This story can be republished for free (details).
Telehealth’s Limits: Battle Over State Lines and Licensing Threatens Patients’ Options published first on https://smartdrinkingweb.weebly.com/
0 notes