#Subramanian Swamy

[bhaskarlive]

Delhi HC to hear Subramanian Swamy’s plea seeking cancellation of Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship

The Delhi High Court is set to hear on Wednesday a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) moved by senior BJP leader Subramanian Swamy seeking direction to the Union Home Ministry to cancel the Indian citizenship of Rahul Gandhi when the Congress leader has “declared himself a British citizen”.

Source: bhaskarlive.in

[rightnewshindi]

सुब्रमण्यम स्वामी ने पीएम मोदी और अमित शाह को दी FIR दर्ज करने की धमकी, जानें क्या है राहुल गांधी से जुड़ा मामला

Subramanian Swamy Question on Rahul Gandhi Citizenship: भारतीय जनता पार्टी (BJP) के सीनियर नेता और पूर्व सांसद डॉ.सुब्रमण्यम स्वामी ने एक बार फिर पीएम नरेंद्र मोदी और केंद्रीय गृह मंत्री अमित शाह के खिलाफ मोर्चा खोल दिया है. सुब्रमण्यम स्वामी ने इन दोनों से राहुल गांधी की नागरिकता को लेकर सवाल भी पूछा है. सोशल मीडिया प्लेटफॉर्म एक्स (पहले ट्विटर) पर सुब्रमण्यम स्वामी ने लिखा, “नरेंद्र मोदी और…

[bharatlivenewsmedia]

Subramanian Swamy | आता भाजपाचे नेते स्वामींनीच केली मोदींची रावणाशी तुलना; म्हणाले “मी लवकरच…”

Subramanian Swamy | आता भाजपाचे नेते स्वामींनीच केली मोदींची रावणाशी तुलना; म्हणाले “मी लवकरच…”

Subramanian Swamy | आता भाजपाचे नेते स्वामींनीच केली मोदींची रावणाशी तुलना; म्हणाले “मी लवकरच…” नवी दिल्ली – गुजरात विधानसभा निवडणुकीच्या एका प्रचारसभेत कॉंग्रेसचे अध्यक्ष मल्लिकार्जुन खर्गे यांनी पंतप्रधान नरेंद्र मोदी यांची रावणाशी तुलना केली होती. आता निवडणूक झाल्यानंतर (Subramanian Swamy on PM Modi)भारतीय जनता पार्टीचेच नेते डॉ. सुब्रमण्यम स्वामी यांनी मोदी यांची रावणाशी तुलना केली आहे.…

[denimbex1986]

In the midst of the controversy surrounding a scene in Oppenheimer, where the titular character is depicted engaging in sexual activity while reciting verses from an ancient Sanskrit scripture, purportedly the Bhagavad Gita, Bollywood actor Kangana Ranaut has stepped forward to praise Christopher Nolan’s biographical thriller film.

Taking to social media on Monday, Kangana lauded the movie as “Christopher Nolan’s best work so far” and expressed her admiration for the part in the film referencing Bhagavad Gita and Lord Vishnu. “Most important film of our time… I am so excited I just didn’t want it to end… It has everything I deeply love, I am passionate about physics and politics… For me, this was like a cinematic orgasm… beyond wonderful,” she noted while sharing a selfie video.

“The theme of the film is that when your nationalism rises, it precedes your religion; but when your humanity rises, it precedes your nationalism and you become a problem for the system. And the system that built you, starts disintegrating you. My favourite part is the reference to Srimad Bhagavad Gita and Lord Vishnu when he channelises his inner Vishnu. Go watch it… it’s a lovely film,” the Queen actor said in the video.

J Robert Oppenheimer, regarded as ‘the father of the atom bomb’, had learnt Sanskrit and was said to be influenced by the Bhagavad Gita. In the film, Oppenheimer, played by Cillian Murphy, is shown having sex with psychologist Jean Tatler (Florence Pugh) as she asks him to read a verse from what appears to be a Sanskrit book, whose title or cover is not visible.

The scene involving Gita in Oppenheimer had irked a section of social media users, who demanded the removal of the sequence from Christopher Nolan’s latest film.

Uday Mahurkar, information commissioner, Government of India, wrote an open letter to Nolan, terming the scene a “disturbing attack on Hinduism” and appealed to the director to remove the scene worldwide.

“We urge, on behalf of billion Hindus and the timeless tradition of lives being transformed by revered Geeta, to do all that is needed to uphold the dignity of their revered book and remove this scene from your film across the world. Should you choose to ignore this appeal it would be deemed as a deliberate assault on Indian civilisation. Eagerly await needful action (sic)” Mahurkar, founder of Save Culture Save India Foundation, wrote.

Union Information and Broadcasting Minister Anurag Thakur has sought an explanation from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) on why it cleared the movie in its present form. According to sources, Thakur has demanded accountability from the CBFC, which functions under the aegis of the I&B Ministry, regarding clearing the movie with the controversial scene, which has hurt the sentiments of a section of the Hindu community.

The Dhaakad actor’s comments come a day after she locked horns with former Rajya Sabha MP Subramanian Swamy after the latter questioned her Y-plus security status. He tweeted, “The SPG knows, and has kept a register of her movements. I wonder why since it is no business of SPG to track Bollywood stars. In her case, on a special dispensation, she has a high level of security provided.”

Kangana replied, “I am not just a Bollywood star sir, I am also a very vocal and concerned citizen, I was the target of political malice in Maharashtra, at my expense nationalists could make a government here. I also spoke about tukde gang and strongly condemned Khalistani groups. I am also a filmmaker, writer and producer and my next production Emergency involves operation Bluestar… there is evident treat to my life hence I requested for extended security… Is there something wrong in this Sir?”'

[secretearthquakecheesecake]

Gandhi Family was and is never a HINDU Virodhi.

Hear this Truth from BJP leader Dr. Subramanian Swamy.

‼️Now In NEWS: National, International, & Social media 📺‼️

[hindustanmorning]

Supreme Court: India's secularism and socialism differ in Western eyes

On Friday, the Supreme Court considered the case regarding the legitimacy of the 42nd amendment to the Constitution. This hearing was conducted regarding the requests made by senior lawyers Subramanian Swamy, Vishnu Shankar Jain, and others. In the hearing, the court mentioned that a judicial review has already been conducted on this matter. The court has postponed the decision regarding this…

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 8th November. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has initiated an inquiry into Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship status, intensifying a politically charged debate with significant implications for Bharatiya politics. This investigation follows a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a BJP supporter in the Allahabad High Court, raising questions about Gandhi’s citizenship. The Delhi High Court is also involved, currently hearing a separate but related petition led by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy. As these legal proceedings unfold, they could impact Gandhi’s political future and the broader landscape of Bharatiya politics. The Basis of the Investigation: Dual Petitions At the center of the case are two concurrent petitions filed by BJP members, each questioning Gandhi’s citizenship. The Allahabad High Court petition, filed by BJP worker S. Vignesh Shishir, calls for a criminal investigation, while Subramanian Swamy’s petition in the Delhi High Court urges the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) to review Gandhi’s citizenship status. Swamy alleges that Gandhi is not an Bharatiya citizen but a “citizen of Britain.” This distinction in petition goals underscores the complexity of the case and raises concerns about the legitimacy of Gandhi’s political role if he holds dual citizenship. Legal Perspectives: The Delhi High Court and Allahabad High Court Cases The Delhi High Court, led by a bench of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, has opted for a cautious approach, aiming to avoid duplicative legal orders. To that end, the court instructed Shishir to provide an affidavit detailing progress in the Allahabad High Court, where proceedings have reportedly advanced, with Shishir submitting confidential evidence to the CBI. Meanwhile, Swamy has argued that his petition focuses solely on the revocation of Gandhi’s citizenship, while Shishir’s petition seeks criminal prosecution. The overlapping yet distinct objectives of these cases have led to procedural delays, with the Delhi High Court rescheduling the next hearing for December 6 to allow for additional documentation. Subramanian Swamy’s Claims and the Ministry of Home Affairs Subramanian Swamy has long alleged that Rahul Gandhi is a British citizen, a claim that he has pursued legally since 2015. He argues that Gandhi’s citizenship disqualifies him from holding public office in Bharat. Swamy’s petition requests that the MHA respond to his concerns, but the ministry has yet to issue a conclusive statement. Given the sensitive nature of the case, the MHA’s involvement is crucial, as any decision they make on citizenship could have serious political consequences. This case thus brings to light legal questions about nationality, political eligibility, and the legal boundaries governing Bharatiya citizenship. Political Ramifications of the Investigation The investigation into Gandhi’s citizenship has sparked widespread debate in Bharat, with significant political implications. Gandhi, a prominent leader of the Congress Party and currently the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, holds a critical role in opposing the ruling BJP. Allegations questioning his nationality could undermine his legitimacy and fuel political narratives against the Congress Party. The BJP has seized upon the investigation, using it to bolster claims of alleged corruption and dishonesty within the Congress Party. However, Congress supporters argue that the inquiry is politically motivated and intended to undermine Gandhi’s influence in national politics. Public Opinion and Media Coverage Bharatiya media has heavily covered the case, sparking intense discussions on news channels, social media, and public forums. The public’s reaction is split, reflecting the country’s polarizing political climate. For some, the inquiry is a legitimate investigation that seeks to ensure adherence to constitutional standards. For others, it represents a diversionary tactic by the BJP to damage the opposition’s reputation.

The investigation has revived debates over nationalism, integrity in public office, and transparency in political leadership, highlighting issues that resonate strongly with voters. Legal and Constitutional Concerns Surrounding Citizenship in Bharat At the heart of the case lies Bharat’s strict stance on citizenship and the legal framework that bars individuals with dual citizenship from holding public office. The Constitution prohibits non-citizens from serving in Parliament, a rule intended to safeguard national interests and ensure the loyalty of public officials. Should evidence surface supporting the claims of Gandhi’s dual citizenship, it could lead to severe legal consequences, including disqualification from office. The legal standards set by the Constitution aim to prevent conflicts of interest, especially concerning foreign allegiances or influences. Congress Party’s Defense Strategy In response to the allegations, Congress leaders have accused the BJP of launching a politically motivated campaign. Congress has consistently asserted Gandhi’s Bharatiya citizenship and his right to participate in Bharatiya politics. Legal experts for the Congress Party argue that there is no substantial evidence supporting the claims, describing the investigation as an attempt to shift public attention from issues like inflation, unemployment, and economic reform. In the coming months, the Congress Party is likely to escalate its defense, possibly mobilizing legal and political resources to counteract the allegations. The Broader Implications for Bharatiya Politics This case carries significant implications beyond Gandhi’s political career, touching on fundamental questions about Bharat’s democratic values, political transparency, and the role of citizenship in defining national identity. The investigation’s outcome could set a legal precedent for the eligibility of political candidates, particularly those with international ties. If the courts rule in favor of revoking Gandhi’s citizenship, it could lead to increased scrutiny of political leaders and their affiliations. Conversely, if Gandhi’s citizenship is upheld, the ruling could be seen as a vindication for the Congress Party and a potential setback for the BJP’s strategy. Conclusion: A Case That Will Shape Bharat’s Political Future The investigation into Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship status is more than a legal matter; it is a critical juncture that could reshape Bharatiya politics. With the CBI’s involvement and the dual proceedings in the Delhi and Allahabad High Courts, the case underscores the highly polarized nature of Bharatiya politics. The outcome could either bolster the Congress Party’s position or serve as a decisive blow to one of its key figures. The focus on citizenship reflects broader societal questions regarding national loyalty, the integrity of political leadership, and the standards to which public officials are held. From an objective viewpoint, the investigation into Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship appears to be as much a political maneuver as it is a legal inquiry. While allegations of dual citizenship are serious and deserve careful scrutiny, the timing and nature of the petitions suggest that political motivations are likely at play. In a democracy, the principles of accountability and transparency should apply to all leaders, regardless of political affiliation. However, cases such as this one often raise concerns about whether such inquiries are used strategically to weaken political opponents. For Bharat’s democratic values to remain robust, it is essential that any legal action taken is grounded in factual evidence and not used as a political weapon. Ultimately, the decision of the courts will determine not only Gandhi’s political future but will also signal the degree to which Bharatiya politics can rise above partisanship to prioritize the rule of law. As this case unfolds, it will serve as a litmus test for the resilience of Bharat’s democratic institutions and their ability to balance political interests with legal integrity.

  The post Dual Citizenship Allegations Against Rahul Gandhi: Inside the CBI Investigation appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[news365times]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 8th November. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has initiated an inquiry into Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship status, intensifying a politically charged debate with significant implications for Bharatiya politics. This investigation follows a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a BJP supporter in the Allahabad High Court, raising questions about Gandhi’s citizenship. The Delhi High Court is also involved, currently hearing a separate but related petition led by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy. As these legal proceedings unfold, they could impact Gandhi’s political future and the broader landscape of Bharatiya politics. The Basis of the Investigation: Dual Petitions At the center of the case are two concurrent petitions filed by BJP members, each questioning Gandhi’s citizenship. The Allahabad High Court petition, filed by BJP worker S. Vignesh Shishir, calls for a criminal investigation, while Subramanian Swamy’s petition in the Delhi High Court urges the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) to review Gandhi’s citizenship status. Swamy alleges that Gandhi is not an Bharatiya citizen but a “citizen of Britain.” This distinction in petition goals underscores the complexity of the case and raises concerns about the legitimacy of Gandhi’s political role if he holds dual citizenship. Legal Perspectives: The Delhi High Court and Allahabad High Court Cases The Delhi High Court, led by a bench of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, has opted for a cautious approach, aiming to avoid duplicative legal orders. To that end, the court instructed Shishir to provide an affidavit detailing progress in the Allahabad High Court, where proceedings have reportedly advanced, with Shishir submitting confidential evidence to the CBI. Meanwhile, Swamy has argued that his petition focuses solely on the revocation of Gandhi’s citizenship, while Shishir’s petition seeks criminal prosecution. The overlapping yet distinct objectives of these cases have led to procedural delays, with the Delhi High Court rescheduling the next hearing for December 6 to allow for additional documentation. Subramanian Swamy’s Claims and the Ministry of Home Affairs Subramanian Swamy has long alleged that Rahul Gandhi is a British citizen, a claim that he has pursued legally since 2015. He argues that Gandhi’s citizenship disqualifies him from holding public office in Bharat. Swamy’s petition requests that the MHA respond to his concerns, but the ministry has yet to issue a conclusive statement. Given the sensitive nature of the case, the MHA’s involvement is crucial, as any decision they make on citizenship could have serious political consequences. This case thus brings to light legal questions about nationality, political eligibility, and the legal boundaries governing Bharatiya citizenship. Political Ramifications of the Investigation The investigation into Gandhi’s citizenship has sparked widespread debate in Bharat, with significant political implications. Gandhi, a prominent leader of the Congress Party and currently the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, holds a critical role in opposing the ruling BJP. Allegations questioning his nationality could undermine his legitimacy and fuel political narratives against the Congress Party. The BJP has seized upon the investigation, using it to bolster claims of alleged corruption and dishonesty within the Congress Party. However, Congress supporters argue that the inquiry is politically motivated and intended to undermine Gandhi’s influence in national politics. Public Opinion and Media Coverage Bharatiya media has heavily covered the case, sparking intense discussions on news channels, social media, and public forums. The public’s reaction is split, reflecting the country’s polarizing political climate. For some, the inquiry is a legitimate investigation that seeks to ensure adherence to constitutional standards. For others, it represents a diversionary tactic by the BJP to damage the opposition’s reputation.

The investigation has revived debates over nationalism, integrity in public office, and transparency in political leadership, highlighting issues that resonate strongly with voters. Legal and Constitutional Concerns Surrounding Citizenship in Bharat At the heart of the case lies Bharat’s strict stance on citizenship and the legal framework that bars individuals with dual citizenship from holding public office. The Constitution prohibits non-citizens from serving in Parliament, a rule intended to safeguard national interests and ensure the loyalty of public officials. Should evidence surface supporting the claims of Gandhi’s dual citizenship, it could lead to severe legal consequences, including disqualification from office. The legal standards set by the Constitution aim to prevent conflicts of interest, especially concerning foreign allegiances or influences. Congress Party’s Defense Strategy In response to the allegations, Congress leaders have accused the BJP of launching a politically motivated campaign. Congress has consistently asserted Gandhi’s Bharatiya citizenship and his right to participate in Bharatiya politics. Legal experts for the Congress Party argue that there is no substantial evidence supporting the claims, describing the investigation as an attempt to shift public attention from issues like inflation, unemployment, and economic reform. In the coming months, the Congress Party is likely to escalate its defense, possibly mobilizing legal and political resources to counteract the allegations. The Broader Implications for Bharatiya Politics This case carries significant implications beyond Gandhi’s political career, touching on fundamental questions about Bharat’s democratic values, political transparency, and the role of citizenship in defining national identity. The investigation’s outcome could set a legal precedent for the eligibility of political candidates, particularly those with international ties. If the courts rule in favor of revoking Gandhi’s citizenship, it could lead to increased scrutiny of political leaders and their affiliations. Conversely, if Gandhi’s citizenship is upheld, the ruling could be seen as a vindication for the Congress Party and a potential setback for the BJP’s strategy. Conclusion: A Case That Will Shape Bharat’s Political Future The investigation into Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship status is more than a legal matter; it is a critical juncture that could reshape Bharatiya politics. With the CBI’s involvement and the dual proceedings in the Delhi and Allahabad High Courts, the case underscores the highly polarized nature of Bharatiya politics. The outcome could either bolster the Congress Party’s position or serve as a decisive blow to one of its key figures. The focus on citizenship reflects broader societal questions regarding national loyalty, the integrity of political leadership, and the standards to which public officials are held. From an objective viewpoint, the investigation into Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship appears to be as much a political maneuver as it is a legal inquiry. While allegations of dual citizenship are serious and deserve careful scrutiny, the timing and nature of the petitions suggest that political motivations are likely at play. In a democracy, the principles of accountability and transparency should apply to all leaders, regardless of political affiliation. However, cases such as this one often raise concerns about whether such inquiries are used strategically to weaken political opponents. For Bharat’s democratic values to remain robust, it is essential that any legal action taken is grounded in factual evidence and not used as a political weapon. Ultimately, the decision of the courts will determine not only Gandhi’s political future but will also signal the degree to which Bharatiya politics can rise above partisanship to prioritize the rule of law. As this case unfolds, it will serve as a litmus test for the resilience of Bharat’s democratic institutions and their ability to balance political interests with legal integrity.

  The post Dual Citizenship Allegations Against Rahul Gandhi: Inside the CBI Investigation appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[tfgadgets]

Delhi HC grants time to Subramanian Swamy to place documents in Rahul Gandhi's citizenship matter

Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi. File | Photo Credit: PTI The Delhi High Court on Wednesday (October 9, 2024) granted BJP leader Subramanian Swamy time to file a copy of petition pending before the Allahabad High Court on the issue of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship. The Court was informed by Mr. Swamy that he had obtained the copy of the petition and the prayers in…

[dhaliwalmanjit]

Subramanian Swamy Tells Dark side of Atal Bihari Vajpayee. | Shubhankar ...

[zingoor]

Subramanian Swamy Tells Dark side of Atal Bihari Vajpayee. | Shubhankar ...

[legalwires]

Rahul Gandhi's Citizenship Challenged: Subramanian Swamy's Petition in Delhi HC

In a fresh legal challenge, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Subramanian Swamy has intensified his allegations against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi by filing a petition in the Delhi High Court. The crux of Swamy’s petition revolves around the contentious issue of Gandhi’s citizenship, which, if substantiated, could have profound legal implications. Swamy’s complaint, previously lodged with the…

[seetharamaiah1]

Rahul Gandhi Citizenship: Subramanian Swamy Moves Delhi High Court | Raj...

[mithilatoday]

Subramanian Swamy Accuses PM Modi and Amit Shah of Shielding Rahul Gandhi, Questions His Citizenship Status

New Delhi, August 10, 2024 – Subramanian Swamy, the President of Virat Hindustan Sangam, former Cabinet Minister, and a six-term Member of Parliament, has raised serious allegations against Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah. Swamy has accused the top BJP leaders of protecting Congress leader Rahul Gandhi despite questions surrounding his citizenship status. Swamy alleged…

[amonerdj]

Es falso que Vladimir Putin recibió personalmente a Xi Jinping en su última visita a Rusia

El 8 de julio pasado, el Primer Ministro de la India, Narendra Modi, aterrizó en Rusia para reunirse con Vladimir Putin. En Moscú, fue recibido por Denis Manturov, Primer Viceprimer Ministro de la Federación Rusa. Al respecto, usuarios criticaron la ausencia del mandatario ruso en el aeropuerto. Entre los críticos se encuentra el exmiembro del Parlamento en el Rajya Sabha, Subramanian Swamy,…

[xlevelpr]

Es falso que Vladimir Putin recibió personalmente a Xi Jinping en su última visita a Rusia

El 8 de julio pasado, el Primer Ministro de la India, Narendra Modi, aterrizó en Rusia para reunirse con Vladimir Putin. En Moscú, fue recibido por Denis Manturov, Primer Viceprimer Ministro de la Federación Rusa. Al respecto, usuarios criticaron la ausencia del mandatario ruso en el aeropuerto. Entre los críticos se encuentra el exmiembro del Parlamento en el Rajya Sabha, Subramanian Swamy,…