#SHE HAS OVER 15BILLION

[himbo-thor]

haha so i had an opportunity to meet a BILLIONAIRE today and uh let me put it this way

eat the rich

[gyrlversion]

Supervision of freed criminals who pose a threat is sub-standard

Prison reforms ‘putting the public at risk’: Supervision of freed criminals who pose a threat is ‘sub-standard’, says watchdog

Dame Glenys Stacey, chief inspector of probation, said there were too few staff

She also identified an over-reliance on unqualified staff and flawed IT systems��

Chris Grayling created a National Probation Service to deal with offenders 

By Ian Drury Home Affairs Editor For The Daily Mail

Published: 20:01 EDT, 27 March 2019 | Updated: 05:31 EDT, 28 March 2019

The public are at risk because of major flaws in a flagship scheme to tackle re-offending, a watchdog warned yesterday.

Supervision of freed criminals who pose a threat is ‘sub-standard, and much of it poor’, according to the damning report. It said 80 per cent of the part-private community rehabilitation companies that monitor 200,000 medium and low-risk offenders were inadequate.

Dame Glenys Stacey, the chief inspector of probation, said there were too few officers, over-reliance on unqualified staff, flawed IT systems and judges had lost confidence in community sentences.

Dame Glenys Stacey also said there were too few officers, over-reliance on unqualified staff, flawed IT systems and judges had lost confidence in community sentences

The report also found that 80 per cent of companies that monitor the 200,000 medium- and low-risk offenders were inadequate

The withering annual report from Dame Glenys is her last before stepping down in May. She said: ‘If probation services are delivered well, there would be less reoffending, fewer people living on the streets, and fewer confused and lonely children, with a smaller number taken into care.

‘Men, women and children currently afraid of assault could lead happier, safer lives.’

The scathing criticisms will make embarrassing reading for the Ministry of Justice, which shook up the regime for managing criminals in the community in 2014.

Under the flagship £3.7billion ‘Transforming Rehabilitation’ programme, then justice secretary Chris Grayling created a National Probation Service to deal with high-risk offenders, while the remaining work went to 21 CRCs.

Under a payment-by-results scheme, the companies check whether criminals are meeting court requirements as well as helping rehabilitate them.

Chris Grayling created a National Probation Service in a £3.7billion ‘Transformation Rehabilitation’ programme to deal with high-risk offenders

Dame Glenys said while probation is a professional, complex service, contracts ‘treat it largely as a transactional business’

But the firms claim they were given fewer offenders to supervise than they were promised, making the deals unviable. The cost of reoffending to society is £15billion a year.

Dame Glenys said: ‘Probation is a complex social service, with professional judgement at its heart, but probation contracts treat it largely as a transactional business.

‘Consequently, there has been a deplorable diminution of the probation profession and a widespread move away from good practice.’

Prisons and probation minister Rory Stewart said: ‘I am grateful for this incisive report, which redoubles my determination to continue working towards a probation service that puts public protection first, commands the confidence of the courts and breaks the cycle of reoffending.’

But Liberal Democrat justice spokesman Wera Hobhouse said last night: ‘We’ve seen many damning reports about Chris Grayling’s probation reforms, but none as excoriating as this.

‘The chief inspector is absolutely right to say that we need a whole new approach to rehabilitation.’

Advertisement

Share or comment on this article:

The post Supervision of freed criminals who pose a threat is sub-standard appeared first on Gyrlversion.

from WordPress https://www.gyrlversion.net/supervision-of-freed-criminals-who-pose-a-threat-is-sub-standard/