#Quaker Oats Guy

[are-they-a-faggot]

THE NEW QUAKER OATS GUY - QUAKER OATS

reasoning: devious little twinkish impish grin. yankee doodle dandy for real.

[jamieaiken919]

“He’s not making a craft, he’s just covering the label because he thinks the Quaker Oats man is reading his thoughts.”

[kellerybird]

I found Harrow and Gideon charms!!! I'm losing my mind!

[noodledood]

I think they underestimate the Hamburger Helper

[chaotic-history]

adjfkskcbd told my friend about Rog rowing himself 30 miles in a canoe in a day while he was in his seventies to go debate the Quakers. I aspire to this level of dedication in disliking people </3

[energyprison]

are quakers really that wild about oats or is it just the one guy

[this-is-my-mindspace]

Dark sides hear me outs

Virgil:

for him I feel like at the start he would do some basic ones potentially such as Ryan from Barbie (the cartoon version),Rodrick heffley or Hiccup from HTTYD but as he gets over the initial embarrassment he has the most obscure ones that genuinely make people requestion him.Some examples would be king boo but specifically Luigi’s mansion version, a letter from the alphabet (idk why) and Aragog from Harry Potter

Janus:

He could go either way really in my opinion-One thing he possibly would do is just name snake types, another he might do for fun is Wines. Finally he could be just as equally chaotic as Remus and go for something like the Quaker Oats guy or like a corn on the cob.

Remus:

Aha.. we all know where this is going.. yep absolute carnage. ChatGPT logo this,cucumber from vegetales that,he definitely would bring up monsters or really gruesome creatures from shows or films,Probably some uncanny valley things too like when they are heavily distorted so they look so weird. He could also pull a bluff and just do really normal ones at the start just to throw people off and make them scared for what he potentially has to come (as the little trashy rat he is)

On another note I feel like Virgil and Roman would heavily agree on the puss in boots one and share some similarities.

[butterfrogsayshi]

my photos app glitched and wouldnt let me exit this screen until i restarted my phone

and yes that is the quaker oats guy

[your-fave-is-christian]

That guy from the Quaker Oats 1877 logo

(He's part of the quaker christoan denomination/j)

The guy from Quaker Oats is Christian!

[internet-sentences]

Me: I wanna become a Quaker

Husband: what the hell is thats. Like the oats?

Me: Yeah exactly. They sound like nice guys. They advocated against American slavery and stuff. The problem is that I’m reading about them and they want you to humble and shit. You can’t wear nice things

Husband: You’ll become depressed after a week and quit. Maybe you could become a Puritan instead. I don’t know anything about this stuff. When I was a kid they used Jesus metaphors in school and I wouldn’t understand because they don’t talk about Jesus where I came from

[abyssalzones]

related to the last post I reblogged. crichton and aeryn sun from farscape could've been m/f for insane bisexuals but unfortunately he keeps imposing heterosexuality on her in a way that makes me want to throw rocks at him because he'll take the most beautiful butch (in my mind. if they were braver.) woman in the world and put her in a sundress that exclusively the quaker oats guy would call scandalous and she'll look like she's about to throw up and it's so wrong. But I think pilot and aeryn could fulfill this niche instead. in an "m"/"f" way where they circle back around to being weird alien nonbinaries. this is a post for like maybe 3 people by the way

[spurgie-cousin]

An SDA founded Kellogg cereals in the US and the church has also owned/produced multiple vegetarian food brands. They aren’t as popular as Kelloggs but I grew up in an area with a large number of SDAs and you could find their products in some normal grocery stores in addition to the SDA owned stores. They were originally called sanitarium food company here and also owned by the Kellogg company at one time, but now known as La Loma or Loma Linda foods.

I always get the Kelloggs and Quaker Oats guys mixed up tbh. I remembered that corn flakes were invented to suppress libidos lol but I always think of John Harvey Kellogg as a quaker. But then Quaker Oats wasn't even founded by Quakers, they just used the imagery to try and establish trust with customers 😭

That is so interesting, though. This ask sent me down a few rabbit holes, and I guess SDA also owns the brand that produces Little Debbie snack cakes, which is a huuuuge brand here in the US (the company is McKee foods and they bought out the Hostess-affiliated producer of Little Debbie on the 2010s). And then, in addition to Sanitarium, they own a soy milk/vegetarian food company in South Korea.

It reminds me of the FLDS and other fundamentalist mormon groups, and how they have their hands and money in a lot of business sectors that most Americans don't know about. I'm not sure if SDA is like this, but they also make members (adults and minors) do a lot of unpaid labor for these businesses, sometimes illegally transporting them across the country for extended periods of time. Which is considered trafficking (the FLDS at one time were considered the single biggest domestic traffickers in North America) so they're always under investigation, but for cults that is such a common thing, I wouldn't be surprised to learn SDA does it too.

[earhartsease]

this ds9 post reminded us how as an autistic kid in our mind the default way to play hopscotch was in a kilt because "scotch" and we'd imagine the kilts flapping gracefully as the hopping ensued - and this interpretation was not discouraged by seeing mainly girls in pleated school skirts playing it but we were very much picturing the hunky quaker oats guy doing it

(turns out scotch meant a gash or cut or line back in late middle english, and so it refers to the chalk boxes you hop through)

[p1ckl3d-k1dn3ys]

Is it just me, or does the Quaker Oats guy look quite handsome recently? Like they made him look less old than I remember.

[show-us-kaidenshenandoah]

i think we need to switch up "hear me out" cakes to be multiple cakes

and your friends' reaction decides where your pick goes. like. they do "the council has decided to hear you out" type shit, y'know?? like. not on degrees of "we agree/disagree" but on the "this is a Hear Me Out/that is a Chronically Online take/that is a You Are Not Alone pick", you feel me?? i can say more

(also heads up: all my examples here are male. bc im building off what ive seen on people's cakes and most of "the spectrum" is men; bc a LOT of people's female hear-me-outs are just "a woman who is mid 30s or older" (who may be a lil kooky, like Eda Clawthorne from "Owl House") or be a female monster-fuckery example (like the female xenomorph from "Alien"). i've never seen an in-between in one of these cakes. the only one iiiii could think of was when 10 year-old me thought itd be cute to hold hands with (in a sapphic puppy-love way) or kiss the cheek of Eliza Thornberry from "The Wild Thornberries", but even then, i dont think Eliza is that weird for me to have crushed on as a kid??? anyway. if a wlw or "im not a girl but i like girls in a sapphic way" type or even a "im horny for women in a way that is not a cishetero white man's headspace" wants to help me by thinking of female equivalences for these following categories??? ill proverbially kiss your forehead. my brain is too dead rn, im also a two-spirited person who is kinda aroace (demi-romantic and very asexual) anyway, and im too focused on "Hollywood, do better" about the lack of spectrum for women to Actually Think Of The Rare Female Characters Who Do Fit This Overall Spectrum Of Items rn)

1️⃣: the main biggie is still the "hear me out" cake

in my opinion, these are ones where the creators themselves would be shocked you liked them (eg. me when i was 11 and going all 👉👈 about the headless cockroach from "Growing Up Creepie" or, y'know what, fuck it, the number 5. not Numbuh 5 from "KND", but the literal number 5 in mathematics. give me absurdism). and i say "creators" bc there shouldnt be irl humans here; bc thats either mean bc its based on looks (stop putting Steve Carrell in there) or its "buddy?? this just killed the mood" (like irl serial killers and shit, like, "no, no, save that for your therapist, no"). so we are predominantly looking at fictional, animated (2D, CGI, comics, illustrated, etc), puppets, masked, heavy make-up, that kinda thing okay?? not just a literal irl person and their face. that just feels mean (why! have i seen!! Steve Carrell! four different times!! guys!!! he's a real person who other real people can look like, that could hurt his or someone's feelings in a big way, wtf!) plus also some absurdism (again, the number 5, but maybe also planets? like Planet X would be on par with the number 5 to me of baffling but "...y'know what? i'll hear you out. sell me on this" lmao)

but again, that's irl humans. so it can be fictional Regular Humans (they just, i guess, gotta be very heinous to be a Regular Human yet qualify for this) (eg. Chris McLean from "Total Drama Island". bc my friends heard me out during a ppt of Weird Childhood (+ Some Lifelong) Crushes i did where one slide was the "Growing Up Creepie" cockroach with snorts and snickers, but still. and then i changed slides to Chris and they screamed and did a (joking) impromptu intervention for me bc of that, even tho *i* think Chris McLean should be one of the two other cakes im about to mention. but i have been out-voted), it can be costumed actors (eg. a live-action "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle" of your choice, the Ferryman from "Annabelle Comes Home", the logo of the Quaker Oats guy, or MAYBE Moe from "The Doodlebops") where there's a spectrum of "that's a guy and his face" and enough make-up where you're like "okay, this hear me out has nothing to do with the facial features here being considered 'ugly' or unconventional"

but just: overall the Appearance Fuckery is either "has no intention of making this person/creature/thing remotely attractive" (eg. i seriously doubt the number 5 was designed to "be hot" lol) OR "they are actively trying to make this person not-hot and not-cool on purpose" (eg. the giant headless cockroach from "Growing Up Creepie", he's not supposed to be hot or cool, he's just kinda there lol but i guess you could also argue like.. idk, im thinking of how Robert Pattison did a very unattractive voice while acting as the Grey Heron of "The Boy & The Heron". like, youre not supposed to find the Heron attractive or cool or anything, i think lmao). that's the point here. at least to me

2️⃣: the other is "normal: but chronically online take" cake, it is the middle one of this trio i am pitching

in my mind, this is the category where "someone put effort to make this character seem attractive or cool or likable beyond their actions"... but they're also unconventional as a pick, it's "not a 'normie' choice" to make (no derogatory intent to "normies" btw)

so this is where we get into shit like the Green Goblin from the Toby McGuire "Spider-man" movies, specifically his robo-suit. sure, the suit may not be rom-com-attractive to look at, and, sure, he may be written sympathetically so audiences have affection for them (moreso Osborn with how they made him scared of himself and clueless to the harm he has caused, but close enough); but that robo-suit WAS made to look COOL. it was made to be liked and gotten toys and posters of, and a person having a crush on the Green Goblin in the robo-suit is a "normal: but chronically online take" in my mind. does that make sense?? bc im adding John Silver from "Treasure Planet" up there too, bc it's Disney and he was meant to be likeable (to betray Jim, yeah, but still), he was not meant to be a romantic lead, but he was drawn and characterized to be likable. that's just a fat man that's a cyborg and a little bit alien; and he's hot. he's a normal person to like, in my mind

but this category as a whole would be me vaguely Getting why some "normies" would scream "nO, YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS" at the pitch, yet also knowing all of my fellow chronic online buddies would approve of the same pitch. like, the chronically online just heard "goblin robot suit" and "anti-hero dad-figure fat cyborg pirate" be upheld as a "hear me out" and would respond like "ah, good choice, mmhm, yes" like we were discussing wine. but like. then my friends wouldve paused and gone like "....not weird enough to be a 'hear me out' tho". like?? as if it's objectively true or a Basic Bitch take? (my chronically online brethern: it's not. lmao it just is a Basic Bitch take to our niche, it's Fucking Weird outside of us)

so it's that in-between of "would be Freak Behavior to any hypothetical 'normie', but would not be to anyone chronically online". so the 1️⃣ category would be where both "normie" and the chronically online are going "pARDON??? HUH?" to the same extreme degree. but this one, 2️⃣, is where it's a more lower-level mix. like maybe some chronically online are going "hUH??" while some are going "oh, yeah, obviously"; but for the most part, this is "normies" go "HUH?" and chronically online go "this is an objectively agreed upon take, not a 'hear me out' pitch". idk, i hope that makes sense. like. maybe some more examples would help, we already discussed two, but we can do more. the two i just did were examples of "not THE most 'obviously yeah' takes for the chronically online" because i wanted to start us in on the logic of why they would count here (at least, to me) so then these next ones can be a "ooooh, yeah, i can see what you mean now", you feel me?

bc, yeah, obligatory "yes but that's obviously objective and not a 'hear me out' pitch" to Kovu from "Lion King II", yes, Nick Wilde from "Zootopia", yes, Robin Hood fox from Disney's "Robin Hood", yes, Gil from "Finding Nemo", yes, Garrus from "Mass Effect", etc, etc, again, they were made to be a romantic lead and/or made to be cool. so, to me, liking them is very normal. and, again, i get that it only is a "yes OBVIOUSLY tho" in ✨️a chronically online✨️ way. but i think most other chronically online people would agree like "yes, weird to 'normies'; but not us" and i think both the "normies" and the More Newly Chronically Online could follow the logic since we just broke down how Green Goblin's robo-suit and alien-cyborg John Silver might be More Unusual Picks but same logic of "made to be liked in some way, ergo Liking Them Like That is not actually that weird". you feel me??

like the creators of these fictional guys would go "oh!! oh, that makes sense, yeah, okay, didnt intend that but nice!" you feel me?? like the spectrum goes from "wHAT?!! ...actually, y'know what, i see it" to "odd choice, but also?? of course". am i making sense?

like you could put your unconventionally attractive people here if they dont quite fit (or fit at all, potentially) with the next cake. like, i wouldnt be mad if the the Purple Wiggle from the original "The Wiggles" group went here, y'know?? like, yes, the Purple Wiggle breaks my "please have it be animated or a puppet or a mask or have heavy make-up, so we arent just potentially arguing about facial features of an irl human (bc that's mean)" rule technically. but thats enough of a "hUH?? i mean yeah buT HUH????" that i, for one, would forgive it and let the Purple Wiggle be on this cake. because it's not about his face or appearance: it's a "hUH??" because he is a fucking Wiggle, so that's what makes him unconventional. does that make sense?? like the "....fucking way way out of left-field, but Yeah Okay" type "unconventials" rather than "well yEAH" like Milo Thatch from "Atlantis" or Roger Dearly from "101 Dalmations" who would be on the next cake (instead of this one), for me, personally)

3️⃣: and the last one (as far as i can think of it, and this one would really be a cupcake or a one-person-serving of cake bc your goal is the other two. this one shouldn't have too many people on it, so you skimp out on this cake for sure) is like the council deciding "normal: not as weird as you think, you're not alone at all" cake. not a "you're basic" tho, but that this pick is more popular with society than the person realizes it is

first of all: this is not a "punishment cake" of "nope, doesnt count". i just vote it be the smallest cake bc it will, ideally, have the least amount of people in it compared to maybe the other two. but yeah, it should be a "no, thats such a valid take, i think it should go on the 'youre not alone' cake", y'know?? like, this cake's purpose isnt to knock someone down, its to be like "omg dude i have so many tiktok thirst edits of this character to show you after this" or "there should be so many more of this guy, this has to be objectively True That This Person Is Attractive, i think we as a society just agree via osmosis, we dont need to hear you out, we need to let you into the discussions about them, let's set up a text-channel on discord about them" type of 🌈realization🌟 okay?? bc the moment anyone is mean about someone trying to be vulnerable and silly online, im rescinding my pitch for this cake. cool? cool

this is for the people who put on Stiles Stilinski from "Teen Wolf" and just... buddy, idk if you actually read the assignment. Dylan O'Brien who plays Stiles Stilinski is an attractive man, like who needs to "hear you out" on this?? im confused? let me show you how MANY MANY MANY edits and fan-art that man has, even with his head shaved. like. im not mad you picked him, he's an attractive guy, sure, why not. i just am surprised if someone maybe teased you to the point of bullying to have thought this was a "hear me out" and not a "oh, yeah, well, of course, that much is obvious". like. that's fucked up if someone made fun of you for Dylan O'Brien (or Steve Carrell since i mentioned him before. and, really, all irl people go on this cake. hell, i wouldn't be surprised if the Purple Wiggle ended up on this cake after some council deliberation and after the surprise of "The Wiggles" name-drop had calmed down). but also, like, someone bond with the two tiktokers i saw pick Dylan O'Brien and show them fanfic of Stiles and thirst edits of his role in "Teen Wolf", preferably while the said tiktokers gets to giggle with ice-cream and a cozy blanket, bc they deserve to have known about the outpour of love their pitch has had, they do not deserve mocking or hatred for their pitches, bc they didnt know what they didnt know

but also i think kind of most fictional characters who are Main Characters + Have A Romantic Interest go here, even if theyre slightly unconventionally attractive, like i said with Milo Thatch of "Atlantis" and Roger Dearly of "101 Dalmations". maybe a different group of friends would decide otherwise, but if i was in your tiktok?? "not as weird as you think" cake for sure for Milo and Roger. like. id also put some "odd choice but yeah" that are not SUPER out of left-field here, like i saw someone put on a couple of people who are Fright Actors that have gone viral. and im like "..out of left-field for sure, but part of why they went viral is bc they are conventionally attractive 9 times out of 10", you get me?? does that make sense? like i saw someone say "the grandpa from the 'Johnny Tsunami' movies" and that's out of left-field and there's no thirst edits of him (as far as im aware), but also i would say "not as weird as you think, actually"

like. the boundaries are nebulous and group-dependent, but i just think itd be fun and itd be a cool spin that also will get some comments to shut up about what is/isnt a "hear me out" cake. bc i agree some of these "hear me out" cakes dont have enough of group 1️�� (for me), and are instead all 2️⃣ and 3️⃣ (for! me!!); but also sometimes people just are unaware and haven't been "let into the room" to know how popular and/or objectively acceptable their pick is, and i dont wanna shame people for that lack of awareness, that's mean. instead, get excited for them like "omg i have so much to show you!" or "we NEED to talk after this video bc hard-same but nobody else is talking about it, i feel like!!" y'know??

but, yeah, that's my compromise/pitch lmao

[energyprison]

Just learned the quaker oats guy got shot to death in a police shootout