#OnlineDiscourse

[mirandatrannzz]

[Week 10]

🌐  The Double-Edged Sword of Social Media: Pressure, Politics, and the Need for Collective Responsibility

Politics vs. Platforms: When Social Media and Governments Clash

The intersection of social media and government regulation exposes a fragile balance between free expression and political influence (Briggs, S. , 2018).

Platforms like Meta have faced criticism for silencing pro-Palestinian voices, with over 1,050 instances of content takedowns and suppression documented by Human Rights Watch during the Israel-Palestine conflict (2023).

📌 This is not mere content moderation - it is a calculated response to geopolitical pressures, raising concerns about platforms shaping political narratives rather than merely hosting discussions (McLaughlin & Velez, 2017).

On the other hand, corporate ambition often clashes with national governance.

In Vietnam, strict data-sharing regulations challenge Meta’s data-driven business model, highlighting how regulatory policies shape user privacy and digital freedoms (Huynh, 2025).

⚠️ These cases prove that social media is far from neutral - it is an arena where corporate and political interests dictate the boundaries of online discourse.

The Dark Side of Online Discourse: Harassment & Hate Speech

Beyond political suppression, social media’s engagement-driven algorithms fuel online toxicity, prioritizing outrage over ethical discourse (KhosraviNik & Esposito, 2018).

The case of Vietnamese pop star Sơn Tùng M-TP is a perfect example of how social media can turn public discourse into a toxic battleground (TUOI TRE ONLINE, 2022).

⚠️ Trigger Warning: This content includes discussions of suicide. Please proceed with caution.

This is the music video that sparked controversy

This is the official music video released after the scandal

🎵 His 2022 music video, There's No One At All, raised valid concerns about its portrayal of mental health. However, the conversation quickly spiraled into mass outrage.

(TUOI TRE ONLINE, 2022)

Algorithms, designed to maximize engagement, amplified negativity (Pohjonen & Udupa, 2017), turning: ➡️ Constructive criticism into harassment ➡️ Discussion into cancel culture ➡️ Concern into hate speech 

This incident highlights the challenges of regulating online content in a decentralized digital environment (Pohjonen & Udupa, 2017).

Once the backlash gained momentum, the sheer volume of hate speech and personal attacks made it nearly impossible to control.

The Sơn Tùng M-TP case proves how social media platforms can quickly become tools for targeted harassment, where: ✔️ Algorithmic amplification fuels negativity ✔️ The rapid spread of outrage overwhelms regulatory systems

⚖️ It serves as a stark reminder that the pursuit of engagement often trumps ethical considerations, leading to a digital world where outrage thrives while nuanced debate is silenced (Pohjonen & Udupa, 2017).

Beyond the Law: Collective Responsibility in Digital Spaces

Given the systemic nature of algorithmic amplification and online toxicity, legal solutions alone are insufficient. The viral spread of harmful content demonstrates the need for a multifaceted approach:

📚 Strengthening Digital Literacy Educating users on algorithmic manipulation can empower them to critically assess content and resist misinformation (Sari & Suryadi, 2022). By understanding how platforms prioritize outrage, users can make more informed engagement decisions, reducing the spread of harmful narratives.

🏛  Holding Platforms Accountable Through CSR Social media companies must take responsibility for the consequences of their algorithms. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives should enforce stricter content moderation policies to prevent the prioritization of harmful engagement over user well-being (Tamvada, 2020). Advocacy groups and public pressure are key to driving ethical platform policies.

🌱 Shifting Online Culture Addressing systemic issues requires a cultural shift in how digital spaces operate (Badel & Baeza, 2021). Beyond regulatory measures, fostering a safer online environment demands ethical platform design, stronger digital literacy programs, and corporate accountability. Without proactive efforts, social media will continue to prioritize profit over ethical responsibility.

Final Thoughts: The Need for Collective Action

⚡ Combating online toxicity and political influence is not the responsibility of a single entity - it is a shared duty. Governments, platforms, and users must work together to create a more ethical digital space.

🔍 Understanding the interplay between corporate interests, regulations, and user behavior is the first step toward moving beyond reactive solutions and toward real change.

Let's build a better, more responsible online world together. 

💬 If this resonates with you, share your thoughts below! 

🔄 Reblog to spread awareness!

References

Badel, F., & Baeza, J. L. (2021). DIGITAL PUBLIC SPACE FOR A DIGITAL SOCIETY: A REVIEW OF PUBLIC SPACES IN THE DIGITAL AGE. ArtGRID - Journal of Architecture Engineering and Fine Arts, 3(2), 127–137. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/artgrid/issue/67840/1002117

Briggs, S. (2018, March 8). About | HeinOnline. HeinOnline. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/collsp52&div=5&id=&page=

Human Rights Watch. (2023). Meta’s Broken Promises: Systemic Censorship of Palestine Content on Instagram and Facebook. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/report/2023/12/21/metas-broken-promises/systemic-censorship-palestine-content-instagram-and

Huynh, T. T. (2025). Everyone Is Safe Now: Constructing the Meaning of Data Privacy Regulation in Vietnam. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2024.36

KhosraviNik, M., & Esposito, E. (2018). Online hate, digital discourse and critique: Exploring digitally-mediated discursive practices of gender-based hostility. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 14(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2018-0003

McLaughlin, B., & Velez, J. A. (2017). Imagined Politics: How Different Media Platforms Transport Citizens Into Political Narratives. Social Science Computer Review, 37(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317746327

Pohjonen, M., & Udupa, S. (2017). Extreme Speech Online: An Anthropological Critique of Hate Speech Debates. International Journal of Communication, 11(0), 19. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5843

Sari, A. D. I., & Suryadi, K. (2022). Strengthening Digital Literacy to Develop Technology Wise Attitude Through Civic Education. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220108.006

Tamvada, M. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility and accountability: a New Theoretical Foundation for Regulating CSR. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 5(1), 1–14. Springeropen. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40991-019-0045-8

TUOI TRE ONLINE. (2022, April 29). Dư luận phẫn nộ vì MV There’s no one at all của Sơn Tùng M-TP có cách giải quyết độc hại. TUOI TRE ONLINE. https://tuoitre.vn/du-luan-phan-no-vi-mv-theres-no-one-at-all-cua-son-tung-m-tp-co-cach-giai-quyet-doc-hai-20220429155227083.htm

[firstoccupier]

Meta’s Bold Dance with Chaos: Embracing Free Speech or Free Fall?

In a groundbreaking move that has left many scratching their heads, Meta, the tech giant formerly known as Facebook, has decided to take a daring leap into what can only be considered the Wild West of the digital age. In a stroke of genius—or perhaps pure madness—Meta has taken a giant step back in time by unraveling its detailed content moderation policies, especially those pesky paragraphs that…

[radarro1]

Understanding the Functionality and Impact of 4chan Platform

4chan is an anonymous online forum facilitating discussions on a wide range of topics. It serves as a platform for users to share images and engage in conversations, often characterized by a diverse and sometimes controversial user base. The forum's structure encourages freedom of expression while also presenting challenges related to moderation and content control.

[rydervaughn]

Twitter’s Trump Ban: Navigating the Fine Line Between Free Speech and Moderation

#MDA20009 #Week5

Twitter's censure of Donald Trump while he was still a President a violation of "free speech" principles and democracy?

Twitter has become a major platform for political databases in recent years. its unique features make it well-suited for this purpose. The suspension of Donald Trump from Twitter in early 2021 ignited a fiery debate about free speech and social media moderation. Some argue that it was an essential move to curb incitement, while others view it as an infringement on free speech rights and a threat to democracy. In this blog, we'll explore the complexities of this issue, balancing the principles of free speech with the necessity of content moderation on social media platforms Twitter has been used to facilitate political debate on a wide range of issues, including elections, public policy, and social movements. Twitter has also been used by political candidates and campaigns to connect with voters and share their messages

Social Media as Public Platforms

Twitter is a platform well-known for its real-time, meaning users can share their thoughts on current issues and events. The reason why this platform is widely used for political parties is because of the short form (280 words) limit on tweets. According to (Vliet, Tomberg & Uitermark 2020), Twitter, like other social media platforms, has become a global stage where political leaders communicate directly with the public. Trump's prolific use of Twitter blurred the lines between his personal expression and official statements. This raises questions about whether social media should be considered a public utility and how this impacts the notion of free speech.

The Power of Private Platforms

On the other hand, Twitter is a private company with its own terms of service. Critics argue that it has the right to moderate content that violates those terms. However, the sheer influence and reach of these platforms grant them immense power over public discourse (Davies, Donald & Grsy 2022). This power becomes especially significant when political leaders are involved. Twitter has been used to facilitate political debate on a wide range of issues, including elections, public policy, and social movements. For example, the #ArabSpring hashtag played a key role in organizing and mobilizing protesters during the Arab Spring uprisings. Twitter has also been used by political candidates and campaigns to connect with voters and share their messages (Chen, Deb & Ferrara 2021).

incitement vs. Free Speech

Twitter cited concerns about Trump's posts inciting violence as the reason for his suspension. This brings forth the debate over where the line between free speech and incitement should be drawn. Exploring the legal precedents and ethical considerations is crucial in understanding the rationale behind Twitter's decision (Gorenc 2022).

The Slippery Slope Argument

The "Slippery slope" argument concerning Twitter's suspension of Donald Trump revolved around the fear that such a move could establish a precedent with far-reaching consequences for free speech and democracy (Chiaro 2020).

First, Precedent for Censorship, critics argue that when a high-profile figure like Donald Trump is banned from a social media platform, it establishes a precedent. They worry that this precedent may embolden platform operators to engage in more extensive censorship, potentially targeting individuals or groups whose views are considered controversial or unpopular by the platform's management (All Things Considered 2017).

Second, Chilling Effect on Speech, This potential for expanding censorship can have a "a chilling effect" on free speech. It means that people may become hesitant to express their opinions freely on those platforms, fearing they might be subject to similar bans or restrictions. In such a climate, diverse viewpoints might be suppressed, leading to a stifling of public discourse (Kakutani 2017).

Third, Threat to Democracy, The concept is that when diverse voices are suppressed, it undermines the core principles of democracy, which rely on open and robust debate. Democracy thrives on the exchange of ideas, and if social media platforms limit this exchange, it could lead to an erosion of democratic values and the emergence of a more homogenized, polarized information environment (Brownstein 2023).

Fourth, Arbitrary Moderation, critics argue that these decisions about who to ban or restrict are often perceived as arbitrary. Without clear and consistent guidelines for moderation, there's a risk that decisions could be influenced by the biases or preferences of platform executives, which would further erode trust in these platforms as neutral and fair spaces (Alizadeh et.al 2022).

Finally, Unintended Consequences, the slippery slope argument highlights that well-intentioned actions like banning Trump can have unintended consequences. It might drive users with extreme or controversial views to alternative platforms that are less regulated, potentially fostering more extreme echo chambers (Roberts 2020).

Alternate Platforms and Echo Chambers

The Trump ban also led to the emergence of alternative platforms that cater to specific ideological groups. This can exacerbate the problem of echo chambers and polarized discourses, as people flock to platforms that align with their views. Discussing the consequences of such fragmentation is essential.

In conclusion, Twitter's suspension of Donald Trump exemplifies the ongoing struggle between free speech principles and content moderation in the digital age. While it raises valid concerns about the power of private platforms and the slippery slope of censorship, it also highlights the need for transparent and consistent guidelines to navigate this complex landscape without compromising demographic values.

List of References

Alizadeh, M, Gilardi, F, Hoes, E, Kluser, KJ, Kubli, M & Marchal, N 2023, 'Content moderation as a political Issue: The Twitter discourse around Trump's ban', Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 23 September, viewed 4 October 2023, <https://www.fabriziogilardi.org/resources/papers/Content-Moderation-Political-Issue.pdf>.

All Things Considered 2017, 'Does Trump's slippery slope argument about confederate status have merit?', Politics, 16 August, viewed 4 October 2023, <https://www.npr.org/2017/08/16/543973293/does-trumps-slippery-slope-argument-about-confederate-statues-have-merit>.

Brownstein, R 2023, 'Trump's threat to democracy is now systemic', Ideas, 2 August, viewed 4 October 2023, <https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/08/donald-trump-indictment-gop-jan-6/674895/>.

Chen, E, Deb, A & Ferrara, E 2021, ‘#Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election’ Journal of Computational Social Science, 2 April, viewed 3 October 2023, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42001-021-00117-9>.

Chiaro, AC 2020, 'The logical fallacies of Donald Trump (With video)', Logical Fallacies, 14 October, viewed 4 October 2023, <https://philosophymt.com/a-trumpian-overture-of-logical-fallacies/>.

Davies, A, Donald, B & Gray, M 2023, 'The power of platforms - precarity and place', Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 16, no. 2, viewed 4 October 2023, <https://academic.oup.com/cjres/article/16/2/245/7176240>.

Gorenc, N 2022, 'Hate speech or free speech: an ethical dilemma?', International Review of Sociology, vol. 32, no. 3, vieewed 4 October 2023. <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03906701.2022.2133406>.

Kakutani, M 2017, 'Donald Trump's chilling language, and the fearsome power of words', Inauguration 2017, 21 January, viewed 4 October 2023, <https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/01/donald-trumps-chilling-language-and-the-power-of-words>.

Roberts, T 2020, 'Trump's legacy may be unintended consequences', President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally at Cecil Airport in Jacksonville, Florida, 24 September, viewed 4 October 2023, <https://www.ncronline.org/opinion/guest-voices/trumps-legacy-may-be-unintended-consequences>.

Vliet, L, Tomberg, P & Uitermark, J 2020, ‘The Twitter parliamentarian database: Analyzing Twitter politics across 26 countries’, Research Article, 16 September, viewed 3 October 2023, <https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237073>.

[dmggamingpodcast]

Episode 91: Is Asmongold a NAZI???? We break it down! | DMG Gaming Podcast Episode 91: Is Asmongold a NAZI???? We break it down! #asmongold #gamingpodcast #gamingnews In this video, we debunk all the wild claims people have been just throwing out there such as calling Asmongold a Nazi. We bring up things people have said and just straight up tell you the truth. 🔔𝐃𝐨𝐧'𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐮𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬. https://www.youtube.com/@DMGGamingPodcast/?sub_confirmation=1 ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ Audio Podcast is currently on your favorite platforms: ApplePodcast:https://ift.tt/FvU2xwP Spotify:https://ift.tt/LhMOpXu ✅ Important Links to Follow 🔗 Superlink https://ift.tt/rmdhOjG 🔗 Link Space https://ift.tt/6KB5wqW 🔗 Stay Connected With Us. Instagram: https://ift.tt/s5rW2pJ Tiktok: https://ift.tt/Tc1pQ2s Twitter (X): https://ift.tt/pM05VTe Rumble: https://ift.tt/UAR8DSN Twitch: https://ift.tt/p4FlYtJ Discord: https://ift.tt/9P0Jako 📩 For business inquiries: dmggamingpodcast@gmail.com ============================= 🎬Suggested videos for you: ▶️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEX-oQCEFZI&t=507s ▶️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fJ5ZszbQZY ▶️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmOgNmKHUo4&t=342s ▶️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJg1htr_cwE&t=2s ▶️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfYXbFzKaDs&t=48s ▶️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3kAMwDLC6E ▶️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKSlblSbqNA&t=502s ================================= #asmongold #streamernews #twitchdrama #youtubecommentary #internetculture #gamingcommunity #dramaalert #falseaccusations #internetrumors #onlinediscourse #cancelculture #contentcreators #socialcommentary #medialiteracy #criticalthinking #onlinecontroversy via DMG Gaming Podcast https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg-0IF3L2-ZkdZknea90jlw April 02, 2025 at 03:11AM