#Office partition in london

[glazingworkslondon]

Guide on Glass Partitions - Glazing Works London

Glass partitions are divider walls or doors made of glass. They are non load bearing and can be made entirely or partially of glass. Due to…

Read more: https://topicterritory.com/guide-on-glass-partitions-glazing-works-london/

[crispsuspended]

Types of office partitions

Choosing the right office partitions can completely transform your workspace. The partitions not only enhance the appearance but also improve the functionality of your office. Here are five modern office partition options that can increase privacy, reduce noise, and foster a more collaborative or focused work environment depending on your needs.

[swiftsureceilings]

Office Partitions London: Optimise Your Workspace And Foster Collaboration

In today's fast-paced business environment, London offices need to be adaptable and cater to diverse work styles. Gone are the days of rigid, closed-off workspaces. Office partitions in London offer a perfect solution, allowing businesses to create a balance between open collaboration areas and dedicated work zones.

The Benefits of Office Partitions

Office partitions offer a multitude of benefits for London businesses, including:

Improved Space Optimisation: Partitions allow you to maximise existing space by dividing large areas into smaller, functional zones. They can create dedicated meeting rooms, private offices, breakout areas, and quiet focus zones without the need for costly structural changes.

Enhanced Collaboration and Communication: Modern office partitions, particularly glass partitions, allow for visual connection between colleagues, fostering collaboration and communication. Employees can stay aware of what's happening around them while maintaining a sense of privacy.

Increased Focus and Productivity: Partitions can help to create dedicated work zones where employees can focus on individual tasks without distractions. This is particularly beneficial for open-plan offices, where noise and activity can be disruptive.

Flexibility and Adaptability: Many partition systems are modular, allowing for easy reconfiguration as your business needs evolve. This flexibility is crucial in today's dynamic work environment, where teams and functions can change over time.

Improved Aesthetics: Modern office partitions come in a variety of styles and finishes, allowing you to create a sleek and professional look for your workspace. They can also be used to incorporate your brand elements and create a cohesive design.

Choosing the Right Office Partitions in London

With a vast selection of office partitions available in London, choosing the right solution for your needs can be overwhelming. Here are some key factors to consider:

Type of Partition: There are several types of office partitions to choose from, each with its own advantages:

Glass Partitions: These offer a modern and visually appealing solution, promoting collaboration while providing some privacy.

Solid Partitions: Ideal for creating completely private spaces like meeting rooms or private offices. They come in various materials like wood or plasterboard.

Demountable Partitions: A cost-effective option for creating flexible work areas that can be easily reconfigured.

Operable Walls: These movable walls offer the ultimate in flexibility, allowing you to create large meeting rooms or private offices and then easily fold them away when not in use.

Functionality: Consider the specific needs of your workspace and the activities that will take place in each partitioned area. Do you need soundproofing features? Will you require whiteboards or pinboards integrated into the partitions?

Aesthetics: Choose partitions that complement your existing office design and reflect your brand identity. Consider the materials, colours, and finishes available.

Budget: Office partitions can range in price depending on the type, material, and features chosen. Set a realistic budget and explore options that fit your needs.

Maximising Collaboration with Office Partitions

While office partitions London offer some level of privacy, it's important to strike a balance to foster collaboration. Here are some tips:

Utilise Glass Partitions: Opt for clear or partially frosted glass partitions whenever possible to maintain visual connection between colleagues.

Open Floor Plan with Partitioned Zones: Maintain an open-plan layout for common areas like breakout spaces, while using partitions to create dedicated work zones.

Collaborative Technology: Integrate technology into your partitions, such as whiteboards or writable surfaces, to encourage collaboration within teams.

Investing in Your London Workspace

Office partitions in London are a cost-effective and versatile solution for optimising your workspace and fostering collaboration. They allow you to create a functional and inspiring environment that caters to the diverse needs of your team.

By carefully considering your requirements and choosing the right type of partition, you can transform your London office into a space that promotes productivity, communication, and employee well-being. This can have a significant positive impact on your company's overall success.

Taking the Next Step

If you're considering implementing office partitions in your London workspace, consult with an experienced office design professional. They can help you assess your needs, explore different partition options, and develop a layout that optimises your space and fosters a collaborative work environment.

About Us:

SwiftSure Ceilings is a leading provider of office fit-out solutions specialising in suspended ceilings, office partitions, office refurbishment, and more. With a commitment to quality, innovation, and customer satisfaction, they help London businesses create inspiring and productive workspaces that meet the demands of the modern workplace. Full details can be found on their informative website at https://www.swiftsureceilings.co.uk/.

[mdglasspartitions]

What You Need To Know About Office Partitions and Their Benefits?

Want to redecorate your home or want to make an additional space in your office? Use office partitions that are best for creating an extra room. Read to know more about glass office partitions.

[fdelopera]

America owes its independence to Haym Salomon, a Sephardic Jewish Patriot

A Jewish American Hero

by Yosef Kaufmann

October 17, 1781. An eerie silence takes hold over the battlefield outside Yorktown, Virginia. After weeks of non-stop artillery shells and rifle fire, the rhythmic pounding of a drum is all that is heard. Through the wispy smoke that floats above the battlefield, a British officer can be seen waving a white flag. General Cornwallis has surrendered Yorktown, ending the last major battle of the American Revolution. The surrender of Yorktown and the nearly 8,000 British troops convinced the British Parliament to start negotiating an end to the war. On September 3, 1783, the treaty of Paris was signed. The war was over.

If not for Haym Salomon, however, the decisive victory at Yorktown never would have happened.

Haym Salomon was born in Leszno, Poland, in 1740. In 1770, he was forced to leave Poland for London as a result of the Partition of Poland. Five years later, he left London for New York City, where he quickly established himself as a broker for international merchants.

Sympathetic to the Patriot cause, Haym joined the New York branch of the Sons of Liberty, a secret society that did what it could to undermine British interests in the colonies. In 1776, he was arrested by the British and charged with being a spy. He was pardoned on condition that he spend 18 months on a British ship serving as a translator for the Hessian mercenaries, as he was fluent in Polish, French, German, Russian, Spanish and Italian. During those 18 months, Haym used his position to help countless American prisoners escape. He also convinced many Hessian soldiers to abandon the British and join the American forces.

In 1778, he was arrested again and sentenced to death for his involvement in a plot to burn the British Royal fleet in the New York Harbour. He was sent to Provost to await execution, but he managed to bribe a guard and escape under the cover of darkness.

He fled New York, which was under the control of the British army, and moved to Philadelphia, the capital of the Revolution.

He borrowed money and started a business as a dealer of bills of exchange. His office was located near a coffee house frequented by the command of the American forces. He also became the agent to the French consul and the paymaster for the French forces in North America. Here he became friendly with Robert Morris, the newly appointed Superintendent of Finance for the 13 colonies. Records show that between 1781 and 1784, through both fundraising and personal loans, he was responsible for financing George Washington over $650,000, today worth approximately over $13 million.

By 1781, the American congress was practically broke. The huge cost of financing the war effort had taken its toll. In September of that year, George Washington decided to march on Yorktown to engage General Cornwallis. A huge French fleet was on its way from the West Indies under the command of Comte De Grasse. The fleet would only be able to stay until late October, so Washington was facing immense pressure to lead an attack on Yorktown before then.

After marching through Pennsylvania, with little in the way of food and supplies, Washington’s troops were on the verge of mutiny. They demanded a full month's pay in coins, not congressional paper money which was virtually worthless, or they would not continue their march. Washington wrote to Robert Morris saying he would need $20,000 to finance the campaign. Morris responded that there was simply no money or even credit left. Washington simply wrote, “Send for Haym Salomon.” Within days, Haym Salomon had raised the $20,000 needed for what proved to be the decisive victory of the Revolution.

Haym’s chessed continued after the war. Whenever he met someone who he felt had sacrificed during the war and needed financial assistance, he didn’t hesitate to do whatever he could to help.

He was also heavily involved in the Jewish community. He was a member of Congregation Mikveh Yisroel in Philadelphia, the fourth oldest synagogue in America, and he was responsible for the majority of the funds used to build the shul’s main building.

He also served as the treasurer to the Society for the Relief of Destitute Strangers, the first Jewish charitable organization in Philadelphia.

On January 8, 1785, Haym died suddenly at the age of 44. Due to the fact the government owed him hundreds of thousands of dollars, his family was left penniless.

His obituary in the Independent Gazetteer read:

Thursday, last, expired, after a lingering illness, Mr. Haym Salomon, an eminent broker of this city, was a native of Poland, and of the Hebrew nation. He was remarkable for his skill and integrity in his profession, and for his generous and humane deportment. His remains were yesterday deposited in the burial ground of the synagogue of this city.

Although there is little proof, many believe that when designing the American Great Seal, George Washington asked Salomon what he wanted as compensation for his generosity during the war. Salomon responded “I want nothing for myself, rather something for my people.” It is for this reason that the 13 stars are arranged in the shape of the Star of David.

[udo0stories]

Sana Shayin, a third-year student studying international relations at King's College London, has been exposed to a lively and thought-provoking atmosphere on a regular basis. Her passions for human rights advocacy and diplomacy have grown throughout this degree. Given the current and rapidly changing political landscape of the region, she is thrilled to be a part of International Relations Today as the Editor for South and Central Asia and contribute to the academic discourse in the field. India is home to about 200 million Muslims, making it one of the world's largest Muslim populations, despite being a minority in the nation that is predominantly Hindi. Despite constitutional protections, Indian Muslims frequently experience violence, intolerance and discrimination since the country’s independence in 1947. Experts claim that anti-Muslim sentiment has surged since Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) came to power in 2014 and began promoting a Hindu nationalist agenda. The government has enacted divisive policies that opponents claim will disenfranchise millions of Muslims and blatantly disregard their rights since Modi was reelected in 2019. Since Modi assumed office, there has been a rise in violence against Muslims. The acts have sparked protests in India and drawn criticism from all around the world. According to several analysts covering India, Modi’s reelection in 2024 would probably increase religious conflict in the nation. The Demographics India is a diverse nation in terms of religion, ethnicity, and language. The majority of its Muslims, who identify as Sunnis, make up roughly 15% of the population, making them by far the largest minority group. Hindus make up about 80% of the population. Similar to the Hindu population, the Muslim population in the country is diverse, with differences in caste, ethnicity, language, and access to political and economic power. Partition's Impact on Hindu-Muslim Relations Scholars claim that the animosity between Muslims and Hindus in India stems in part from the 1947 partition of British India and the schisms that happened during the British colonial era. The British decided to abandon the subcontinent after World War II because their economy was destroyed and they could no longer maintain their empire. Before the country was divided, Jawaharlal Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi led the Indian National Congress in organizing massive protests and acts of civil disobedience against the British government in an effort to gain independence. Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s political organisation, the All India Muslims League, demanded a separate state for Muslims. In 1947, a British judge arbitrarily drew the boundaries between a Hindu-majority India and a Muslim-majority Pakistan, which included what is now Bangladesh. The Partition resulted in widespread migrations of Muslims to Pakistan and Hindus and Sikhs to India, as well as deadly riots and horrifying intercommunal violence. Survivors remember villages burning to the rubble, dead tossed in the streets, and blood-soaked trains transporting refugees from one nation to another. Historians estimate that between 200,000 and 500,000 people died. It is unclear why groups of people who had lived together for hundreds of years fought one another. The British "divide-and-rule" policy, which gave the Muslim minority—roughly 25% of the population—some electoral advantages, has drawn criticism from some analysts. Others highlight disputes between political movements that organized followers of the Muslim and Hindu faiths. Nearly 35 million Muslims still lived in India after Partition. The Religion Factor  The nation’s 75-year-old constitution upholds egalitarian values such as nondiscrimination and socioeconomic equality. The Constitution does not specifically require the separation of church and state, despite the word "secular" being added to the preamble in 1976. Congress party leaders who fought for

India’s independence promoted a country that treated all its people equally, regardless of their religious beliefs. Gandhi, who championed a unified India free from discrimination, was assassinated by Nathuram Godse, a Hindi nationalist, in 1948. The first prime minister of India, Nehru, considered the greatest threat to the country as those seeking to split the country along religious lines, particularly among Hindu factions. He felt that secularism was necessary to create a harmonious society and prevent another tragedy similar to what happened after Partition. Hindu nationalists contend that since Hindus’ sacred territories are inside India, whereas Christian and Muslim holy territories are outside, Hindus are the “true sons of the soil.” Generally speaking, they support laws meant to convert India into a Hindu state. Even though the majority of Indian Muslims are sprung from Hindus who converted to Islam, many regard them as foreigners. Founded in 1980, the BJP traces its origins to the political wing of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a Hindu nationalist paramilitary volunteer group. The BJP secured a single-party majority in the Lok Sabha—India’s lower house of parliament and most powerful political body—for the first time in 2014, electing party leader Narendra Modi as Prime Minister. In 2019, the party won a majority once more following a contentious campaign packed with anti-Muslim rhetoric. What type of discrimination do Indian Muslims face?  Muslims have faced prejudice in the workplace, in the classroom, and in housing. Many face obstacles in their pursuit of riches, political influence, and limited access to essential services, including healthcare. Furthermore, even with constitutional protections, people frequently have difficulty obtaining justice after being the target of prejudice. Muslims’ presence in parliament has stagnated over the past 20 years; following the 2019 elections, they controlled only 5% of the seats. This is partially because of the BJP’s ascent; by the middle of 2022, the party had zero Muslim Members of Parliament. In the meantime, a 2019 report by the NGO Common Cause, situated in India, discovered that half of the police polled exhibited anti-Muslim prejudice, which decreased their likelihood of stepping in to prevent crimes against Muslims. Analysts have also noted widespread impunity for those who attack Muslims. Recently, state and national courts and government bodies have often reversed convictions or dropped prosecutions against Hindus accused of participating in violence against Muslims. States are passing more and more legislation that limits the religious freedoms of Muslims, such as laws that forbid wearing headscarves in public places and prohibit conversion. Additionally, in a move critics refer to as “bulldozer justice,” authorities have punished Muslims extrajudicially. Authorities in multiple states demolished people’s homes in 2022, claiming the buildings didn’t have the necessary permits. Critics countered that they mainly targeted Muslims, some of whom had recently taken part in demonstrations. Although the practice has persisted, India’s Supreme Court responded by ruling that demolitions “cannot be retaliatory.” What controversial policies has the Modi government imposed on Muslims? The Citizenship Amendment Act was passed by the parliament in December 2019 and signed by Modi. It permits Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, and Christian migrants from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan to obtain citizenship more quickly. Critics claim that because the law excludes Muslims and applies a religious standard to citizenship for the first time, it is discriminatory. The Modi government claims that the law was made to protect these three countries' mostly Muslim vulnerable religious minorities from persecution. Simultaneously, the BJP pledged to finish the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in its 2019 election manifesto. The NRC was created in the 1950s

specifically for the state of Assam in order to determine whether the residents of that state were immigrants from what is now Bangladesh's neighbor or Indian citizens. The Assam government revised its registry in 2019, leaving out about two million Bengali Hindus and Muslims. Assume that this process is implemented across the nation. Critics contend that in that scenario, a sizable Muslim population might become stateless because they lack the necessary documentation and are not qualified for the Citizenship Amendment Act's expedited citizenship process. Meanwhile, Jammu and Kashmir, the only Muslim-majority state in India, has seen its political stature eroded under Modi. The state, located in the mountainous border region under dispute with Pakistan, was divided into two parts and its special constitutional authority was taken away by the government in August 2019. Since then, Indian authorities have repressed the people’s rights in the area, frequently in the name of preserving security. In 2021, they detained well-known political figures and activists, harassed and arrested journalists, and shut down the internet 85 times. The government maintains that security has improved, yet since the division, armed groups have killed dozens of civilians.  In December 2023, the Supreme Court, upholding the government’s decision,  ruled that the territory should regain statehood in time for local elections the following year. "Muslims' status will change more the longer Hindu nationalists are in power, and it will be harder to reverse such changes," says Ashutosh Varshney, a Brown University expert on Indian intercommunal conflict. Maintaining India's Secularism Although there is an increase in anti-Muslim sentiment among Hindus, experts say it is wrong to assume that all Hindus and BJP supporters are against Muslims. Muslims and Hindus have resisted the BJP's attempts to weaken secularism in India in the form of activists, law scholars, and students. For instance, following the passage of the Citizenship Amendment Act, some state chief ministers declared they would not carry out the law, and about 2,000 academics and professionals signed a declaration condemning it for violating the spirit of the Constitution. Global Reactions Numerous foreign governments and international organizations have denounced the BJP's discriminatory policies towards Muslims, highlighting specific concerns with the Citizenship Amendment Act, the BJP's actions in Kashmir, and anti-Muslim rhetoric. The UN human rights office described the Citizenship Amendment Act as “fundamentally discriminatory.” Iran, Kuwait, and Qatar were among the Muslim-majority countries to file formal complaints against India in 2022 over public officials’ Islamophobic remarks. The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), comprising fifty-seven member states, has demanded that India cease the “systematic practices against Indian Muslims” and the “growing spate of hatred and defamation of Islam.” Nevertheless, Modi has succeeded in deepening India’s relations with the Gulf countries dominated by Muslims, including the United Arab Emirates, where he presided over an event for Indian expats and dedicated a brand-new Hindu temple in Abu Dhabi. Since they have strengthened ties with India, successive U.S. administrations have been hesitant to denounce the country’s atrocities openly. For instance, in February 2020, President Donald Trump visited India and complimented Prime Minister Narendra Modi on his support for religious liberty while remaining silent on the violence that had broken out in Delhi. Instead of openly criticizing the BJP government or Modi, the Joe Biden administration has opted to strengthen the strategic partnership between India and the United States. It is believed that Biden has privately voiced concerns about human rights. India, however, received its lowest ranking of “country of particular concern” in the 2020 report from the independent U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom—a designation it has held since 2004.

The most recent reports have upheld that classification and pushed for the US government to impose sanctions on Indian officials who are accountable for mistreatment. Some members of Congress have also expressed concerns.

[mariacallous]

Rishi Sunak knows what he must do in Northern Ireland. He cannot cringe any longer before that region’s backwoodsmen and their cheerleaders in his own party. Unlike his predecessors, he has nothing to lose, with probably just two years in office. He clearly has a deal on a revised Irish trade protocol with the EU on the table, and he has the parliamentary votes to push it through. His reputation has no time for error.

The partition of Ireland was born a century ago to appease northern Protestant sentiment. That sentiment has ever since abused self-rule – under licence from London – with blatantly sectarian government. This was sustainable as long as trade and citizenship were left fluid across Ireland, with both sides of the border still partners in the European single market.

Brexit crashed that sustainability. Boris Johnson’s (largely personal) fixation that Brexit meant leaving the single market required a trade protocol to keep Irish economic unity intact. Though temporary and a mess, this rescued the Brexit deal. Now Johnson is plotting to undermine Sunak’s clearing of that mess. Red and green lanes will separate internal and “external” Irish commerce, aided by digital technology. Regulatory disputes will be handled by a two-tier process under the European court of justice. This is perfectly sensible, given the nature of Ireland’s geography. All trade is a compromise of sovereignty.

The Protestant DUP was born of objection. It was formed to oppose the cooperative unionism of the 1980s and the Good Friday peace agreement. Its members were political primitives who divided their cities with walls and called for creationism to be taught in schools. Dusted with the covenant of unionism, they have held the Tory right – and Johnson – in thrall, a toxin on the party’s Westminster backbenches. They represent just a quarter of the region’s population.

Northern Ireland is desperate for a settlement, especially its young people, and for the return of self-government, which the DUP denies in opposing the protocol. The region voted against Brexit and barely half its voters are still firmly committed to the union with Britain. A poll a year ago showed a majority expects Irish reunification within a decade. Perhaps most significant is that declared Catholics now outnumber Protestants. Things are clearly changing.

Yet one concession for resolving the DUP impasse this week is said to be a strengthening of the minority veto in the Stormont assembly. This entrenchment of sectarian “power-sharing” is precisely what has frozen the region’s government for most of a quarter of a century. It should be unthinkable that one party should be free to veto not just facets of Britain’s overseas trade policy but, in effect, any improvement in the UK’s absurdly ill-judged dealings with the EU over Brexit. If the DUP continues to oppose power-sharing, that sharing should be revised, not the protocol.

The dire history of British rule over Ireland merits the “reparation” of some London sympathy for eventual reunion. One day this will come. Protocol revision offers the glue of restored economic unity. Letting the DUP block such a joining would be outrageous. Sunak must know this – and know what he should now do.

[createdworldchori]

Veer Savarkar - Biography

Introduction

Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, popularly known as Veer Savarkar, was a revolutionary freedom fighter, nationalist, social reformer, writer, and the pioneer of Hindutva ideology. He played a crucial role in India's independence movement and is remembered for his immense courage, strong nationalist vision, and contribution to social reforms. lets discuss about veer savarkar jeevan prichay

Early Life and Education

Born: May 28, 1883

Place: Bhagur, Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Father: Damodar Pant Savarkar

Mother: Radhabai Savarkar

Brothers: Ganesh Savarkar & Narayan Savarkar

Education:

Completed his studies at Fergusson College, Pune.

Went to Gray’s Inn Law College, London, to study law.

Even during his student days, Savarkar was deeply involved in nationalist movements. In 1904, he founded the Abhinav Bharat Society, a secret revolutionary group dedicated to overthrowing British rule.

Revolutionary Activities

Swadeshi Movement (1905): Led protests and organized the burning of British-made goods in opposition to Bengal’s partition.

1857 Revolt Research: He wrote "The First War of Indian Independence - 1857", highlighting the 1857 revolt as a national movement against British rule. The British banned this book.

Revolutionary Work in London: While in London, he mobilized Indian students and promoted armed struggle for India's independence.

Involvement in Jackson's Assassination (1909): His close associate Madan Lal Dhingra assassinated British officer Curzon Wyllie in London.

Imprisonment and 'Kala Pani' Punishment

In 1909, Savarkar was arrested by the British for his revolutionary activities.

In 1910, he was sentenced to life imprisonment and was sent to the notorious Cellular Jail (Kala Pani) in Andaman & Nicobar Islands.

He endured severe torture and solitary confinement for 10 years.

During his imprisonment, he formulated his ideology of Hindutva and wrote many poems and essays.

Release and Social Reforms

In 1924, he was released from jail under strict conditions and was placed under house arrest in Ratnagiri, Maharashtra.

He worked for the abolition of untouchability and social reforms in Hindu society.

He promoted Hindutva, defining it as a cultural and national identity rather than a religious concept.

Hindutva and Nationalism

In his book "Hindutva: Who is a Hindu?", he laid the foundation of Hindu nationalism.

He advocated for Akhand Bharat (United India) and emphasized self-reliance and national unity.

He strongly opposed the partition of India and the appeasement policies of the British and Congress leaders.

Death

On February 1, 1966, he voluntarily undertook "Atmarpan" (self-sacrifice through fasting).

He passed away on February 26, 1966.

Legacy

Veer Savarkar remains a symbol of patriotism, courage, and selfless service to the nation.

His contributions to India’s freedom struggle, social reforms, and nationalism are still widely debated and admired.

He played a key role in shaping modern Hindutva ideology and inspired many nationalists.

Conclusion

Veer Savarkar was not just a freedom fighter but also a thinker, reformer, and nationalist leader. His life was a saga of sacrifice, struggle, and unwavering devotion to India. His ideas continue to influence Indian politics and nationalism even today.

hope this blog about वीर सावरकर की जीवनी will be very helpful for you.

[famous-interior-designer]

Welcome to Custom Design Interiors Pvt. Ltd., your top choice for exquisite interior design in Kolkata! In this video, we’re excited to present innovative bathroom design ideas that blend elegance with practicality. Whether you're envisioning a sleek powder room, a modern washroom, or a complete luxurious bathroom, we bring you the latest trends and stylish concepts that will elevate your space. From stunning tiles to high-end sanitary fittings, we’ve got you covered!

📞 Contact Us Today: 084203 69659 🌐 Visit Our Website: customdesigninteriors-pvtltd.com 📍 Find Us Here: Location on Google

✨ Transform Your Bathroom with Luxurious Design Ideas

At Custom Design Interiors Pvt. Ltd., we specialize in custom bathroom designs that reflect your personal style while offering top-tier functionality. We focus on premium materials like Italian tiles and marble, creating spaces that exude sophistication. Our goal is to combine beauty with comfort, ensuring your bathroom becomes an oasis of relaxation.

💎 Bathroom Designs That Make a Statement

In this video, we’ll showcase:

Elegant sanitary fittings 🚿 that elevate the aesthetic of your bathroom.

Stylish vanity units 💡 that are as functional as they are beautiful.

Innovative ideas for wet and dry area partitions 🛁, ensuring a clean, organized, and luxurious space.

Unique partition solutions to optimize small and large bathrooms 💫.

🚿 Creating Wet and Dry Zones for Optimal Functionality

Effective space planning is key. We’ll guide you on how to:

Separate your bathroom into distinct wet and dry zones for an organized, efficient layout.

The wet zone includes the shower and bathing area 🛁, while the dry zone accommodates the vanity and WC 🚽.

💸 Affordable Luxury for Every Budget

Whether you have a 2 BHK or 3 BHK flat, our designs offer an upscale, luxurious feel without breaking the bank. We deliver beautiful, functional bathrooms that reflect your personal taste while respecting your budget.

🖤 Bold Black Bathroom Design Inspiration

Inspired by the bold, refined interiors of Dubai, New York, London, and Paris, black bathroom designs are a perfect fusion of style and sophistication:

Sleek matte black tiles 🖤 for a timeless, refined look.

Chic black vanity units 🖤 for an elegant touch.

Luxurious finishes 🏅 that make a bold statement.

🏅 Top-Quality Materials for Lasting Luxury

We use only the best materials, ensuring your bathroom looks beautiful and stands the test of time:

Premium sanitary fittings 🔩

Luxury tiles 🏷️ Our designs promise both opulence and practicality!

🌟 Why Choose Custom Design Interiors Pvt. Ltd.?

As the leading interior designers in Kolkata, we offer:

Creative precision 🖌️ in every bathroom design.

Expertise in designing bathrooms for 2 BHK and 3 BHK flats 🏢.

Tailored solutions for both residential and commercial spaces 🏢.

💰 Luxury Within Your Budget

We offer a range of budget-friendly bathroom designs that don’t compromise on luxury or style. Perfect for 2 BHK and 3 BHK flats, our affordable designs make your bathroom dreams come true.

✨ Let’s Design Your Dream Bathroom Together

Ready to transform your bathroom into a luxurious retreat? Whether you need help with space planning, luxurious designs, or interior décor, Custom Design Interiors Pvt. Ltd. is here to bring your vision to life. We create spaces that enhance your lifestyle and add value to your home.

📞 Get a Free Consultation Today Contact: 084203 69659 Visit Our Website: customdesigninteriors-pvtltd.com Follow Us on Instagram: Instagram Like Us on Facebook: Facebook Pinterest Inspiration: Pinterest

Our Services:

Bathroom Design in Kolkata ��

Affordable 2 BHK Flat Interior Design 🏠

Custom Interior Design 🎨

Best Interior Designers in Kolkata 🏆

Office and Commercial Interior Design 🏢

Interior Design for Flats 🏙️

✨ Let’s Begin Your Bathroom Transformation Today! Contact us now to get started on creating the luxurious, functional bathroom you deserve.

[glazingworkslondon]

Glass Partitions London, UK - Office Glass Wall Partition

We offer commercial office glass wall partitions in London, UK at cost effective prices. Call our Glaziers for glass wall and door partition installation today!

[crispsuspended]

5 Types of office partitions

Transforming office environments with innovative partitions and designs positively influences the well-being and efficiency of employees, fostering heightened engagement in their tasks. These partitions not only provide essential privacy and optimal space utilization but also contribute to the overall aesthetic appeal of the workplace. Dive into the following sections to explore the diverse types of office partitions and the myriad benefits they offer.

[swiftsureceilings]

Professional Office Partitions in London - Swiftsure Ceilings

Swiftsure Ceilings provides and installs several types of office partitions systems in South East London, Kent, and London. They also provide partition with soundproofing and fire certifications as needed. To discover more, call 020 8663 6683 immediately!

[mdglasspartitions]

Office partitions are built to ensure privacy within the workplace. However, there may be a time when you need to remove the office partitions london once and for all.

[dickens-daily]

CHAPTER XXV—A VISIT TO NEWGATE

‘The force of habit’ is a trite phrase in everybody’s mouth; and it is not a little remarkable that those who use it most as applied to others, unconsciously afford in their own persons singular examples of the power which habit and custom exercise over the minds of men, and of the little reflection they are apt to bestow on subjects with which every day’s experience has rendered them familiar. If Bedlam could be suddenly removed like another Aladdin’s palace, and set down on the space now occupied by Newgate, scarcely one man out of a hundred, whose road to business every morning lies through Newgate-street, or the Old Bailey, would pass the building without bestowing a hasty glance on its small, grated windows, and a transient thought upon the condition of the unhappy beings immured in its dismal cells; and yet these same men, day by day, and hour by hour, pass and repass this gloomy depository of the guilt and misery of London, in one perpetual stream of life and bustle, utterly unmindful of the throng of wretched creatures pent up within it—nay, not even knowing, or if they do, not heeding, the fact, that as they pass one particular angle of the massive wall with a light laugh or a merry whistle, they stand within one yard of a fellow-creature, bound and helpless, whose hours are numbered, from whom the last feeble ray of hope has fled for ever, and whose miserable career will shortly terminate in a violent and shameful death. Contact with death even in its least terrible shape, is solemn and appalling. How much more awful is it to reflect on this near vicinity to the dying—to men in full health and vigour, in the flower of youth or the prime of life, with all their faculties and perceptions as acute and perfect as your own; but dying, nevertheless—dying as surely—with the hand of death imprinted upon them as indelibly—as if mortal disease had wasted their frames to shadows, and corruption had already begun!

It was with some such thoughts as these that we determined, not many weeks since, to visit the interior of Newgate—in an amateur capacity, of course; and, having carried our intention into effect, we proceed to lay its results before our readers, in the hope—founded more upon the nature of the subject, than on any presumptuous confidence in our own descriptive powers—that this paper may not be found wholly devoid of interest. We have only to premise, that we do not intend to fatigue the reader with any statistical accounts of the prison; they will be found at length in numerous reports of numerous committees, and a variety of authorities of equal weight. We took no notes, made no memoranda, measured none of the yards, ascertained the exact number of inches in no particular room: are unable even to report of how many apartments the gaol is composed.

We saw the prison, and saw the prisoners; and what we did see, and what we thought, we will tell at once in our own way.

Having delivered our credentials to the servant who answered our knock at the door of the governor’s house, we were ushered into the ‘office;’ a little room, on the right-hand side as you enter, with two windows looking into the Old Bailey: fitted up like an ordinary attorney’s office, or merchant’s counting-house, with the usual fixtures—a wainscoted partition, a shelf or two, a desk, a couple of stools, a pair of clerks, an almanack, a clock, and a few maps. After a little delay, occasioned by sending into the interior of the prison for the officer whose duty it was to conduct us, that functionary arrived; a respectable-looking man of about two or three and fifty, in a broad-brimmed hat, and full suit of black, who, but for his keys, would have looked quite as much like a clergyman as a turnkey. We were disappointed; he had not even top-boots on. Following our conductor by a door opposite to that at which we had entered, we arrived at a small room, without any other furniture than a little desk, with a book for visitors’ autographs, and a shelf, on which were a few boxes for papers, and casts of the heads and faces of the two notorious murderers, Bishop and Williams; the former, in particular, exhibiting a style of head and set of features, which might have afforded sufficient moral grounds for his instant execution at any time, even had there been no other evidence against him. Leaving this room also, by an opposite door, we found ourself in the lodge which opens on the Old Bailey; one side of which is plentifully garnished with a choice collection of heavy sets of irons, including those worn by the redoubtable Jack Sheppard—genuine; and those said to have been graced by the sturdy limbs of the no less celebrated Dick Turpin—doubtful. From this lodge, a heavy oaken gate, bound with iron, studded with nails of the same material, and guarded by another turnkey, opens on a few steps, if we remember right, which terminate in a narrow and dismal stone passage, running parallel with the Old Bailey, and leading to the different yards, through a number of tortuous and intricate windings, guarded in their turn by huge gates and gratings, whose appearance is sufficient to dispel at once the slightest hope of escape that any new-comer may have entertained; and the very recollection of which, on eventually traversing the place again, involves one in a maze of confusion.

It is necessary to explain here, that the buildings in the prison, or in other words the different wards—form a square, of which the four sides abut respectively on the Old Bailey, the old College of Physicians (now forming a part of Newgate-market), the Sessions-house, and Newgate-street. The intermediate space is divided into several paved yards, in which the prisoners take such air and exercise as can be had in such a place. These yards, with the exception of that in which prisoners under sentence of death are confined (of which we shall presently give a more detailed description), run parallel with Newgate-street, and consequently from the Old Bailey, as it were, to Newgate-market. The women’s side is in the right wing of the prison nearest the Sessions-house. As we were introduced into this part of the building first, we will adopt the same order, and introduce our readers to it also.

Turning to the right, then, down the passage to which we just now adverted, omitting any mention of intervening gates—for if we noticed every gate that was unlocked for us to pass through, and locked again as soon as we had passed, we should require a gate at every comma—we came to a door composed of thick bars of wood, through which were discernible, passing to and fro in a narrow yard, some twenty women: the majority of whom, however, as soon as they were aware of the presence of strangers, retreated to their wards. One side of this yard is railed off at a considerable distance, and formed into a kind of iron cage, about five feet ten inches in height, roofed at the top, and defended in front by iron bars, from which the friends of the female prisoners communicate with them. In one corner of this singular-looking den, was a yellow, haggard, decrepit old woman, in a tattered gown that had once been black, and the remains of an old straw bonnet, with faded ribbon of the same hue, in earnest conversation with a young girl—a prisoner, of course—of about two-and-twenty. It is impossible to imagine a more poverty-stricken object, or a creature so borne down in soul and body, by excess of misery and destitution, as the old woman. The girl was a good-looking, robust female, with a profusion of hair streaming about in the wind—for she had no bonnet on—and a man’s silk pocket-handkerchief loosely thrown over a most ample pair of shoulders. The old woman was talking in that low, stifled tone of voice which tells so forcibly of mental anguish; and every now and then burst into an irrepressible sharp, abrupt cry of grief, the most distressing sound that ears can hear. The girl was perfectly unmoved. Hardened beyond all hope of redemption, she listened doggedly to her mother’s entreaties, whatever they were: and, beyond inquiring after ‘Jem,’ and eagerly catching at the few halfpence her miserable parent had brought her, took no more apparent interest in the conversation than the most unconcerned spectators. Heaven knows there were enough of them, in the persons of the other prisoners in the yard, who were no more concerned by what was passing before their eyes, and within their hearing, than if they were blind and deaf. Why should they be? Inside the prison, and out, such scenes were too familiar to them, to excite even a passing thought, unless of ridicule or contempt for feelings which they had long since forgotten.

A little farther on, a squalid-looking woman in a slovenly, thick-bordered cap, with her arms muffled in a large red shawl, the fringed ends of which straggled nearly to the bottom of a dirty white apron, was communicating some instructions to her visitor—her daughter evidently. The girl was thinly clad, and shaking with the cold. Some ordinary word of recognition passed between her and her mother when she appeared at the grating, but neither hope, condolence, regret, nor affection was expressed on either side. The mother whispered her instructions, and the girl received them with her pinched-up, half-starved features twisted into an expression of careful cunning. It was some scheme for the woman’s defence that she was disclosing, perhaps; and a sullen smile came over the girl’s face for an instant, as if she were pleased: not so much at the probability of her mother’s liberation, as at the chance of her ‘getting off’ in spite of her prosecutors. The dialogue was soon concluded; and with the same careless indifference with which they had approached each other, the mother turned towards the inner end of the yard, and the girl to the gate at which she had entered.

The girl belonged to a class—unhappily but too extensive—the very existence of which, should make men’s hearts bleed. Barely past her childhood, it required but a glance to discover that she was one of those children, born and bred in neglect and vice, who have never known what childhood is: who have never been taught to love and court a parent’s smile, or to dread a parent’s frown. The thousand nameless endearments of childhood, its gaiety and its innocence, are alike unknown to them. They have entered at once upon the stern realities and miseries of life, and to their better nature it is almost hopeless to appeal in after-times, by any of the references which will awaken, if it be only for a moment, some good feeling in ordinary bosoms, however corrupt they may have become. Talk to them of parental solicitude, the happy days of childhood, and the merry games of infancy! Tell them of hunger and the streets, beggary and stripes, the gin-shop, the station-house, and the pawnbroker’s, and they will understand you.

Two or three women were standing at different parts of the grating, conversing with their friends, but a very large proportion of the prisoners appeared to have no friends at all, beyond such of their old companions as might happen to be within the walls. So, passing hastily down the yard, and pausing only for an instant to notice the little incidents we have just recorded, we were conducted up a clean and well-lighted flight of stone stairs to one of the wards. There are several in this part of the building, but a description of one is a description of the whole.

It was a spacious, bare, whitewashed apartment, lighted, of course, by windows looking into the interior of the prison, but far more light and airy than one could reasonably expect to find in such a situation. There was a large fire with a deal table before it, round which ten or a dozen women were seated on wooden forms at dinner. Along both sides of the room ran a shelf; below it, at regular intervals, a row of large hooks were fixed in the wall, on each of which was hung the sleeping mat of a prisoner: her rug and blanket being folded up, and placed on the shelf above. At night, these mats are placed on the floor, each beneath the hook on which it hangs during the day; and the ward is thus made to answer the purposes both of a day-room and sleeping apartment. Over the fireplace, was a large sheet of pasteboard, on which were displayed a variety of texts from Scripture, which were also scattered about the room in scraps about the size and shape of the copy-slips which are used in schools. On the table was a sufficient provision of a kind of stewed beef and brown bread, in pewter dishes, which are kept perfectly bright, and displayed on shelves in great order and regularity when they are not in use.

The women rose hastily, on our entrance, and retired in a hurried manner to either side of the fireplace. They were all cleanly—many of them decently—attired, and there was nothing peculiar, either in their appearance or demeanour. One or two resumed the needlework which they had probably laid aside at the commencement of their meal; others gazed at the visitors with listless curiosity; and a few retired behind their companions to the very end of the room, as if desirous to avoid even the casual observation of the strangers. Some old Irish women, both in this and other wards, to whom the thing was no novelty, appeared perfectly indifferent to our presence, and remained standing close to the seats from which they had just risen; but the general feeling among the females seemed to be one of uneasiness during the period of our stay among them: which was very brief. Not a word was uttered during the time of our remaining, unless, indeed, by the wardswoman in reply to some question which we put to the turnkey who accompanied us. In every ward on the female side, a wardswoman is appointed to preserve order, and a similar regulation is adopted among the males. The wardsmen and wardswomen are all prisoners, selected for good conduct. They alone are allowed the privilege of sleeping on bedsteads; a small stump bedstead being placed in every ward for that purpose. On both sides of the gaol, is a small receiving-room, to which prisoners are conducted on their first reception, and whence they cannot be removed until they have been examined by the surgeon of the prison. [2]

Retracing our steps to the dismal passage in which we found ourselves at first (and which, by-the-bye, contains three or four dark cells for the accommodation of refractory prisoners), we were led through a narrow yard to the ‘school’—a portion of the prison set apart for boys under fourteen years of age. In a tolerable-sized room, in which were writing-materials and some copy-books, was the schoolmaster, with a couple of his pupils; the remainder having been fetched from an adjoining apartment, the whole were drawn up in line for our inspection. There were fourteen of them in all, some with shoes, some without; some in pinafores without jackets, others in jackets without pinafores, and one in scarce anything at all. The whole number, without an exception we believe, had been committed for trial on charges of pocket-picking; and fourteen such terrible little faces we never beheld.—There was not one redeeming feature among them—not a glance of honesty—not a wink expressive of anything but the gallows and the hulks, in the whole collection. As to anything like shame or contrition, that was entirely out of the question. They were evidently quite gratified at being thought worth the trouble of looking at; their idea appeared to be, that we had come to see Newgate as a grand affair, and that they were an indispensable part of the show; and every boy as he ‘fell in’ to the line, actually seemed as pleased and important as if he had done something excessively meritorious in getting there at all. We never looked upon a more disagreeable sight, because we never saw fourteen such hopeless creatures of neglect, before.

On either side of the school-yard is a yard for men, in one of which—that towards Newgate-street—prisoners of the more respectable class are confined. Of the other, we have little description to offer, as the different wards necessarily partake of the same character. They are provided, like the wards on the women’s side, with mats and rugs, which are disposed of in the same manner during the day; the only very striking difference between their appearance and that of the wards inhabited by the females, is the utter absence of any employment. Huddled together on two opposite forms, by the fireside, sit twenty men perhaps; here, a boy in livery; there, a man in a rough great-coat and top-boots; farther on, a desperate-looking fellow in his shirt-sleeves, with an old Scotch cap upon his shaggy head; near him again, a tall ruffian, in a smock-frock; next to him, a miserable being of distressed appearance, with his head resting on his hand;—all alike in one respect, all idle and listless. When they do leave the fire, sauntering moodily about, lounging in the window, or leaning against the wall, vacantly swinging their bodies to and fro. With the exception of a man reading an old newspaper, in two or three instances, this was the case in every ward we entered.

The only communication these men have with their friends, is through two close iron gratings, with an intermediate space of about a yard in width between the two, so that nothing can be handed across, nor can the prisoner have any communication by touch with the person who visits him. The married men have a separate grating, at which to see their wives, but its construction is the same.

The prison chapel is situated at the back of the governor’s house: the latter having no windows looking into the interior of the prison. Whether the associations connected with the place—the knowledge that here a portion of the burial service is, on some dreadful occasions, performed over the quick and not upon the dead—cast over it a still more gloomy and sombre air than art has imparted to it, we know not, but its appearance is very striking. There is something in a silent and deserted place of worship, solemn and impressive at any time; and the very dissimilarity of this one from any we have been accustomed to, only enhances the impression. The meanness of its appointments—the bare and scanty pulpit, with the paltry painted pillars on either side—the women’s gallery with its great heavy curtain—the men’s with its unpainted benches and dingy front—the tottering little table at the altar, with the commandments on the wall above it, scarcely legible through lack of paint, and dust and damp—so unlike the velvet and gilding, the marble and wood, of a modern church—are strange and striking. There is one object, too, which rivets the attention and fascinates the gaze, and from which we may turn horror-stricken in vain, for the recollection of it will haunt us, waking and sleeping, for a long time afterwards. Immediately below the reading-desk, on the floor of the chapel, and forming the most conspicuous object in its little area, is the condemned pew; a huge black pen, in which the wretched people, who are singled out for death, are placed on the Sunday preceding their execution, in sight of all their fellow-prisoners, from many of whom they may have been separated but a week before, to hear prayers for their own souls, to join in the responses of their own burial service, and to listen to an address, warning their recent companions to take example by their fate, and urging themselves, while there is yet time—nearly four-and-twenty hours—to ‘turn, and flee from the wrath to come!’ Imagine what have been the feelings of the men whom that fearful pew has enclosed, and of whom, between the gallows and the knife, no mortal remnant may now remain! Think of the hopeless clinging to life to the last, and the wild despair, far exceeding in anguish the felon’s death itself, by which they have heard the certainty of their speedy transmission to another world, with all their crimes upon their heads, rung into their ears by the officiating clergyman!

At one time—and at no distant period either—the coffins of the men about to be executed, were placed in that pew, upon the seat by their side, during the whole service. It may seem incredible, but it is true. Let us hope that the increased spirit of civilisation and humanity which abolished this frightful and degrading custom, may extend itself to other usages equally barbarous; usages which have not even the plea of utility in their defence, as every year’s experience has shown them to be more and more inefficacious.

Leaving the chapel, descending to the passage so frequently alluded to, and crossing the yard before noticed as being allotted to prisoners of a more respectable description than the generality of men confined here, the visitor arrives at a thick iron gate of great size and strength. Having been admitted through it by the turnkey on duty, he turns sharp round to the left, and pauses before another gate; and, having passed this last barrier, he stands in the most terrible part of this gloomy building—the condemned ward.

The press-yard, well known by name to newspaper readers, from its frequent mention in accounts of executions, is at the corner of the building, and next to the ordinary’s house, in Newgate-street: running from Newgate-street, towards the centre of the prison, parallel with Newgate-market. It is a long, narrow court, of which a portion of the wall in Newgate-street forms one end, and the gate the other. At the upper end, on the left hand—that is, adjoining the wall in Newgate-street—is a cistern of water, and at the bottom a double grating (of which the gate itself forms a part) similar to that before described. Through these grates the prisoners are allowed to see their friends; a turnkey always remaining in the vacant space between, during the whole interview. Immediately on the right as you enter, is a building containing the press-room, day-room, and cells; the yard is on every side surrounded by lofty walls guarded by chevaux de frise; and the whole is under the constant inspection of vigilant and experienced turnkeys.

In the first apartment into which we were conducted—which was at the top of a staircase, and immediately over the press-room—were five-and-twenty or thirty prisoners, all under sentence of death, awaiting the result of the recorder’s report—men of all ages and appearances, from a hardened old offender with swarthy face and grizzly beard of three days’ growth, to a handsome boy, not fourteen years old, and of singularly youthful appearance even for that age, who had been condemned for burglary. There was nothing remarkable in the appearance of these prisoners. One or two decently-dressed men were brooding with a dejected air over the fire; several little groups of two or three had been engaged in conversation at the upper end of the room, or in the windows; and the remainder were crowded round a young man seated at a table, who appeared to be engaged in teaching the younger ones to write. The room was large, airy, and clean. There was very little anxiety or mental suffering depicted in the countenance of any of the men;—they had all been sentenced to death, it is true, and the recorder’s report had not yet been made; but, we question whether there was a man among them, notwithstanding, who did not know that although he had undergone the ceremony, it never was intended that his life should be sacrificed. On the table lay a Testament, but there were no tokens of its having been in recent use.

In the press-room below, were three men, the nature of whose offence rendered it necessary to separate them, even from their companions in guilt. It is a long, sombre room, with two windows sunk into the stone wall, and here the wretched men are pinioned on the morning of their execution, before moving towards the scaffold. The fate of one of these prisoners was uncertain; some mitigatory circumstances having come to light since his trial, which had been humanely represented in the proper quarter. The other two had nothing to expect from the mercy of the crown; their doom was sealed; no plea could be urged in extenuation of their crime, and they well knew that for them there was no hope in this world. ‘The two short ones,’ the turnkey whispered, ‘were dead men.’

The man to whom we have alluded as entertaining some hopes of escape, was lounging, at the greatest distance he could place between himself and his companions, in the window nearest to the door. He was probably aware of our approach, and had assumed an air of courageous indifference; his face was purposely averted towards the window, and he stirred not an inch while we were present. The other two men were at the upper end of the room. One of them, who was imperfectly seen in the dim light, had his back towards us, and was stooping over the fire, with his right arm on the mantel-piece, and his head sunk upon it. The other was leaning on the sill of the farthest window. The light fell full upon him, and communicated to his pale, haggard face, and disordered hair, an appearance which, at that distance, was ghastly. His cheek rested upon his hand; and, with his face a little raised, and his eyes wildly staring before him, he seemed to be unconsciously intent on counting the chinks in the opposite wall. We passed this room again afterwards. The first man was pacing up and down the court with a firm military step—he had been a soldier in the foot-guards—and a cloth cap jauntily thrown on one side of his head. He bowed respectfully to our conductor, and the salute was returned. The other two still remained in the positions we have described, and were as motionless as statues. [3]

A few paces up the yard, and forming a continuation of the building, in which are the two rooms we have just quitted, lie the condemned cells. The entrance is by a narrow and obscure stair-case leading to a dark passage, in which a charcoal stove casts a lurid tint over the objects in its immediate vicinity, and diffuses something like warmth around. From the left-hand side of this passage, the massive door of every cell on the story opens; and from it alone can they be approached. There are three of these passages, and three of these ranges of cells, one above the other; but in size, furniture and appearance, they are all precisely alike. Prior to the recorder’s report being made, all the prisoners under sentence of death are removed from the day-room at five o’clock in the afternoon, and locked up in these cells, where they are allowed a candle until ten o’clock; and here they remain until seven next morning. When the warrant for a prisoner’s execution arrives, he is removed to the cells and confined in one of them until he leaves it for the scaffold. He is at liberty to walk in the yard; but, both in his walks and in his cell, he is constantly attended by a turnkey who never leaves him on any pretence.

We entered the first cell. It was a stone dungeon, eight feet long by six wide, with a bench at the upper end, under which were a common rug, a bible, and prayer-book. An iron candlestick was fixed into the wall at the side; and a small high window in the back admitted as much air and light as could struggle in between a double row of heavy, crossed iron bars. It contained no other furniture of any description.

Conceive the situation of a man, spending his last night on earth in this cell. Buoyed up with some vague and undefined hope of reprieve, he knew not why—indulging in some wild and visionary idea of escaping, he knew not how—hour after hour of the three preceding days allowed him for preparation, has fled with a speed which no man living would deem possible, for none but this dying man can know. He has wearied his friends with entreaties, exhausted the attendants with importunities, neglected in his feverish restlessness the timely warnings of his spiritual consoler; and, now that the illusion is at last dispelled, now that eternity is before him and guilt behind, now that his fears of death amount almost to madness, and an overwhelming sense of his helpless, hopeless state rushes upon him, he is lost and stupefied, and has neither thoughts to turn to, nor power to call upon, the Almighty Being, from whom alone he can seek mercy and forgiveness, and before whom his repentance can alone avail.

Hours have glided by, and still he sits upon the same stone bench with folded arms, heedless alike of the fast decreasing time before him, and the urgent entreaties of the good man at his side. The feeble light is wasting gradually, and the deathlike stillness of the street without, broken only by the rumbling of some passing vehicle which echoes mournfully through the empty yards, warns him that the night is waning fast away. The deep bell of St. Paul’s strikes—one! He heard it; it has roused him. Seven hours left! He paces the narrow limits of his cell with rapid strides, cold drops of terror starting on his forehead, and every muscle of his frame quivering with agony. Seven hours! He suffers himself to be led to his seat, mechanically takes the bible which is placed in his hand, and tries to read and listen. No: his thoughts will wander. The book is torn and soiled by use—and like the book he read his lessons in, at school, just forty years ago! He has never bestowed a thought upon it, perhaps, since he left it as a child: and yet the place, the time, the room—nay, the very boys he played with, crowd as vividly before him as if they were scenes of yesterday; and some forgotten phrase, some childish word, rings in his ears like the echo of one uttered but a minute since. The voice of the clergyman recalls him to himself. He is reading from the sacred book its solemn promises of pardon for repentance, and its awful denunciation of obdurate men. He falls upon his knees and clasps his hands to pray. Hush! what sound was that? He starts upon his feet. It cannot be two yet. Hark! Two quarters have struck;—the third—the fourth. It is! Six hours left. Tell him not of repentance! Six hours’ repentance for eight times six years of guilt and sin! He buries his face in his hands, and throws himself on the bench.

Worn with watching and excitement, he sleeps, and the same unsettled state of mind pursues him in his dreams. An insupportable load is taken from his breast; he is walking with his wife in a pleasant field, with the bright sky above them, and a fresh and boundless prospect on every side—how different from the stone walls of Newgate! She is looking—not as she did when he saw her for the last time in that dreadful place, but as she used when he loved her—long, long ago, before misery and ill-treatment had altered her looks, and vice had changed his nature, and she is leaning upon his arm, and looking up into his face with tenderness and affection—and he does not strike her now, nor rudely shake her from him. And oh! how glad he is to tell her all he had forgotten in that last hurried interview, and to fall on his knees before her and fervently beseech her pardon for all the unkindness and cruelty that wasted her form and broke her heart! The scene suddenly changes. He is on his trial again: there are the judge and jury, and prosecutors, and witnesses, just as they were before. How full the court is—what a sea of heads—with a gallows, too, and a scaffold—and how all those people stare at him! Verdict, ‘Guilty.’ No matter; he will escape.

The night is dark and cold, the gates have been left open, and in an instant he is in the street, flying from the scene of his imprisonment like the wind. The streets are cleared, the open fields are gained and the broad, wide country lies before him. Onward he dashes in the midst of darkness, over hedge and ditch, through mud and pool, bounding from spot to spot with a speed and lightness, astonishing even to himself. At length he pauses; he must be safe from pursuit now; he will stretch himself on that bank and sleep till sunrise.

A period of unconsciousness succeeds. He wakes, cold and wretched. The dull, gray light of morning is stealing into the cell, and falls upon the form of the attendant turnkey. Confused by his dreams, he starts from his uneasy bed in momentary uncertainty. It is but momentary. Every object in the narrow cell is too frightfully real to admit of doubt or mistake. He is the condemned felon again, guilty and despairing; and in two hours more will be dead.

[2] The regulations of the prison relative to the confinement of prisoners during the day, their sleeping at night, their taking their meals, and other matters of gaol economy, have been all altered-greatly for the better—since this sketch was first published. Even the construction of the prison itself has been changed.

[3] These two men were executed shortly afterwards. The other was respited during his Majesty’s pleasure.

_____

Title | Previous Chapter | Next Chapter |

[archupnet]

In the ever-tightening urban environments of today, micro-units are emerging as a proposed solution for the housing crisis, particularly for the younger generation. These incredibly small apartments often ranging from 20 to 40 square meters promise affordability and accessibility, but are they truly a solution, or are they simply forcing young people to inherit a diminished version of space and comfort compared to previous generations? The Shrinking Living Space: A Generational Comparison If we take a historical perspective, we see a notable trend living spaces are shrinking for each successive generation. Consider the 1950s, when the average apartment for a family in America might have been around 1,200 square feet (111 square meters). Fast forward to the late 20th century, and the apartments young professionals moved into were approximately 800-900 square feet (74-83 square meters). Today, micro-units targeted at Gen Z and young millennials are as small as 300-400 square feet (28-37 square meters), reflecting the dramatic reduction in space. This trend is not confined to the U.S.; similar patterns can be observed across major urban centers globally from London to Tokyo, to Cairo. For young people, this means inheriting a lifestyle defined by compact living, with fewer opportunities for personalization, privacy, and comfort than their parents or grandparents experienced. The decline in space over time symbolizes, for many, a reduction in the quality of life. Beyond that, the rising housing costs make affordability a bigger concern than ever, leading to compromises that earlier generations didn't have to make. It's not just the space that has diminished, but also the freedom that comes with it. Efficiency vs. Quality of Life Micro-units are designed to optimize every square inch through multifunctional furniture, built-in storage solutions, and spatial creativity. Features like fold-down beds, retractable desks, and movable partitions transform a single room into different zones as needed a living area during the day, a sleeping area at night, and perhaps even an office space in between. But is the concept of maximizing every inch of space a sufficient trade-off for space itself? While the idea of multifunctional spaces and compact living might seem innovative, for many it raises questions about what is being sacrificed. For instance, is working from a bedroom that doubles as a kitchen, a sustainable arrangement for mental and emotional well-being? The pandemic has shown that adequate separation between different functions within a living space is essential for balance. Unfair Inheritance: Comparing Generational Space Realities Looking at space usage over generations, it is evident that today's young people face a different reality. Their grandparents likely lived in homes with yards, spare rooms, and attics. Their parents perhaps lived in apartments with clearly defined bedrooms, separate kitchens, and plenty of storage space. But Gen Z finds themselves in a very different scenario shrinking space, shrinking budgets, and increased pressures. The reasons behind this shift are manifold urban migration, high real estate prices, scarcity of land, and the economic changes over the decades. According to a report by The National Low Income Housing Coalition, more than 11 million renter households in the United States spend over half their income on rent. For many young people today, the dream of a large, sprawling home is increasingly becoming a distant fantasy, replaced by the reality of compact living. However, the environmental side of this equation should also be considered. Smaller homes are typically more energy-efficient, require fewer resources, and can help minimize urban sprawl all crucial factors in the fight for sustainable living. The question, however, is whether sustainability must come at the expense of space, or whether we can find a balance. Is Micro-Living a Solution or a Compromise? There is no denying that micro-units offer solutions for affordability and urban density. In cities like Hong Kong, Tokyo, and even New York, these units serve as a lifeline for young professionals who otherwise wouldn't be able to afford living independently in the city. In 2019, Hong Kong saw more than 280,000 people living in subdivided flats of less than 140 square feet (13 square meters). These realities raise a question is micro-living about providing a solution, or is it simply normalizing a new level of compromise? The architecture and construction industries must strive for innovative solutions that don't simply shrink living space but instead reimagine how living can be affordable without sacrificing quality of life. The micro-unit trend suggests a systemic inequality between generations. It highlights the increasing economic burden faced by young people today, alongside the societal shift towards densely packed cities and unsustainable real estate markets. The Architectural Role: Designing for the Future What role does architecture play in this landscape? Architects and urban planners must find ways to balance the demands for affordable, sustainable housing while also addressing the quality of life issues that come with micro-units. Co-housing and shared amenities might be part of the answer designing buildings that feature shared common spaces, larger kitchens, communal work areas, and other amenities to offset the lack of personal space. This is a model that has gained traction in countries like Denmark and the Netherlands, where community and social interaction are integrated into residential architecture to enrich life beyond individual unit walls. The rise of micro-units forces us to ask difficult questions about the future of housing. Is it fair for the next generation to inherit a lifestyle that requires them to sacrifice space and comfort? Are we designing cities that prioritize profit over people? To create an equitable and sustainable future, architecture must not only address environmental needs but also social and emotional needs providing not just a place to live, but a place to thrive. The Solution Lies in Architectural Ingenuity To overcome these challenges, architects must lead the way in reimagining urban housing. Mixed-use buildings, adaptable spaces, and an emphasis on community living could create environments where young people do not feel confined or forced into compromises. The next generation deserves more than a small unit they deserve a home that feels like a sanctuary and not just a temporary stopgap. By embracing innovative design, integrating nature into urban spaces, and thinking about new ways to use shared amenities, we can find a balance that is both sustainable and humane. Micro units may solve immediate housing challenges, but they should be seen as a stepping stone, not the end goal. The future of housing lies in giving people especially the younger generations not just a place to live, but a space where they can truly belong. Read the full article

[cocotanglikescars]

Blog 2 : Week 7

Balfour, A. J. (1917, November 2). The Balfour Declaration. British National Archives. - A letter from British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild, expressing the British government's support for the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine.

2. Palestine Royal Commission. (1937, July). The Peel Commission Report. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office. - A report by a British commission led by Lord Peel, recommending the partition of Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states.

3. Morris, B. (1988). The birth of the Palestinian refugee problem, 1947–1949. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. -A comprehensive historical analysis examining the causes and circumstances that led to the displacement of Palestinian Arabs during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War.

4. Pappé, I. (2006). The ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Oxford: Oneworld Publications. - Pappé's work argues that the expulsion of Palestinians in 1948 was a deliberate and systematic process.

i think these documents provides crucial insights into the historical events that have shaped the current Israeli-Palestinian conflict. the mian thing i noticed was they underscore the importance of historical context in analyzing current events, and the challenges in reconciling divergent historical interpretations.