#Martino Tattara
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
LA INFLUENCIA DE LAS PLATAFORMAS
sábado, 23 de septiembre de 2023
Las lecturas "Plataforms and Plateaus" escrita por Jørn Utzon, y Platforms: Architecture and the Use of the Ground redactada por Pier Vittorio Aureli and Martino Tattara, nos presenta la idea de la plataforma como un elemento arquitectónico grandioso que puede tener un impacto importante en la forma en que experimentamos y percibimos el entorno construido.
La introducción de plataformas en el entorno puede transformar radicalmente nuestra percepción del espacio inmediato. El autor, Utzon, da el ejemplo de esto con los antiguos templos mayas en Yucatán, México, que se encuentran construidos sobre plataformas elevadas.
Las plataformas, gracias a su altura, tienen el poder de despertar fuertes respuestas emocionales al provocar sensaciones lejanía, calma o apertura en medio de entornos urbanos caóticos. Este impacto emocional es positiva e interesante para las personas.
Ambas proposiciones se relacionan mucho, ya que, ambas destacan cómo las plataformas, al estar elevadas sobre su entorno inmediato, tienen la capacidad de generar respuestas emocionales importantes. Los antiguos templos mayas en Yucatán, mencionados en la Proposición #1, dan el ejemplo de cómo una plataforma elevada puede cambiar por completo la forma en que podemos experimentar un entorno natural, lo que está relacionado con la idea en la Proposición #2 de que las plataformas pueden provocar sensaciones de lejanía y calma. El poder que tiene las plataformas para despertar respuestas emocionales positivas, como se menciona en la Proposición #2, se demuestra con la transformación de la selva en una vista abierta desde las altas plataformas de los templos mayas. Por lo tanto, estas dos proposiciones resaltan cómo la arquitectura de las plataformas puede influir en nuestras emociones y percepciones del entorno.
La transformación radical de nuestra percepción del espacio por medio de la plataforma, no solo extiende variedad de posibilidades visuales, sino que también cambia la experiencia y la relación de las personas con el entorno natural.
Este concepto de transformación de la percepción a través de la plataforma se puede aplicar en los espacios urbanos donde el uso de las plataformas, terrazas elevadas o incluso parques elevados puede cambiar la forma en que la gente interactúa con la ciudad. Al elevarse por encima del nivel de la calle, estos espacios ofrecen nuevas perspectivas, vistas panorámicas y una sensación de escape del bullicio urbano.
La capacidad de las plataformas para generar respuestas emocionales al crear una sensación de lejanía, calma o apertura en medio de entornos urbanos caóticos las convierte en elementos arquitectónicos poderosos y de mucho enriquecimiento para las personas. Este impacto emocional positivo y su capacidad para ofrecer una perspectiva diferente e interesante en el paisaje urbano hacen que las plataformas sean elementos valiosos en el diseño urbano contemporáneo.
En conclusión, las lecturas "Plataforms and Plateaus", y Platforms: Architecture and the Use of the Ground, me parecieron bastantes interesantes y esto me lleva a reflexionar sobre como podemos usar el diseño arquitectonico como un medio para transformar nuestra percepción del entorno. Las plataformas no solo son elementos arquitectónicos, sino también espacios que tienen la posibilidad de cambiar la forma en que vivimos y experimentamos el mundo que nos rodea.
Referencias:
Conditions - Pier Vittorio Aureli et al. - Platforms: architecture and the use of the ground. (s. f.). https://www.e-flux.com/architecture/conditions/287876/platforms-architecture-and-the-use-of-the-ground/
«Platforms and Plateaus. Ideas of a Danish architect». (2017, 14 marzo). Transfer. https://www.transfer-arch.com/monograph/platforms-and-plateaus/
0 notes
Photo
Momentum III. Limited Framework
#drian Phiffer#AFAB Architecture#Alejandro Carrasco Hidalgo#Ángela Molina#Atxu Amann#Cesar Lopez#Daniel Martín-Villamuelas#Eduardo Cilleruelo Terán#Guillermo Sánchez-Arsuaga#Kapka Kassabova#Laura Puchades#Lluis Alexandre Casanovas Blanco#Martino Tattara#Momentum Magazine#Neeraj Bhatia#n’UNDO#Pablo Martínez Capdevila#Pedro Azevedo#Rebecca Carrai#Tatiana Poggi
0 notes
Photo
Dogma // Everyday is Like Sunday
Project for the transformation of office parks into living and working spaces.
Team: Pier Vittorio Aureli, Martino Tattara // Luciano Aletta, Ophelie Dozat, Hubert Holewik, Ezio Merchiorre and Giovanna Pittalis
2015
http://www.dogma.name/
5 notes
·
View notes
Photo
1. Stop City, Dogma - Pier Vittorio Aureli & Martino Tattara, 2007 . 2. East-West/West-East, Richard Serra, Qatar . . "Stop City is the hypothesis for a non-figurative architectural language for the city. By assuming the form of the border that separates urbanization from empty space, Stop City is proposed as the absolute limit, and thus, as the very form of the city. Stop City develops vertically. Stop City is an archipelago of islands of high density. The growth of Stop City happens by virtue of its limit, i.e. by the punctual repetition of the basic unit, which is a city of 500.000 inhabitants made of eight slabs measuring 500 by 500 meters, 25 meters thick. These eight slabs are positioned on the border of a square with side length of 3 kilometres, thus demarcating an “empty” area. Each slab is a ��city within the city”, an Immeuble Cité that is in itself a self-sufficient city not characterized by any specific program or activity, being the support of multiple programs or activities." DOGMA (Pier Vittorio Aureli, Martino Tattara) #dogma #stopcity #utopian #architecture #serra #richardserra https://www.instagram.com/p/B_7uts8JSKF/?igshid=1ql9zb887yglr
4 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Axonometric of A Field of WallsProject on Giovanni Battista Piranesi’s Campo Marzio dell’Antica Roma. Italy - Dogma | Pier Vittorio Aureli and Martino Tattara (2012).
More information about the project:
https://hiddenarchitecture.net/a-field-of-walls/
63 notes
·
View notes
Photo
“The current domestic landscape is characterized by an increasing gap between, on the one hand, temporary dwellers, freelance workers, and single parents producing new forms of cohabiting, and on the other hand, the reassuring and often celebrated clichés of traditional family life.” (Pier Vittorio Aureli, Martino Tattara, 2)
Project by Sidewalk Labs https://www.scribd.com/document/414381098/MIDP-Volume-1?secret_password=oW9zgFX48e5bSRCaPj2t#fullscreen&from_embed
0 notes
Photo
Dogma (Pier Vittorio Aureli, Martino Tattara with Alice Bulla)
A Simple Heart, 2002-2009
44 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Reminded me of your wonderful interior drawings. I hope you are still doing those time to time, in your small pink takao notebook. ‘The Room of One’s Own’ A research by one of my favourite Architectural Practices, DOGMA, you know, by Pier Vittorio Aurelli and Martino Tattara. The project focuses on the room as a private space. “ Woolf argued that having a room of one’s own was both a condition and an expression of the ability to engage critically with the patriarchal logic of the domestic space. After all, rooms express how individuals are distinguished from each other and how they are defined as persons based on gender, origin and class.”
0 notes
Photo
Managed to get a signed copy of Martino Tattara & Pier Vittorio Aureli’s new book, Loveless: The Minimum Dwelling and its Discontents at a book launch at the Architectural Association a couple weeks ago. So looking forward to reading it. Anyone already read it and have any thoughts? [theory] via /r/architecture https://www.reddit.com/r/architecture/comments/bw1t1m/managed_to_get_a_signed_copy_of_martino_tattara/?utm_source=ifttt
0 notes
Photo
https://www.ribaj.com/culture/home-futures-design-museum
Visiting the Design Museum’s thought-provoking new exhibition Home Futures, it’s easy to smile at outlandish past visions of the future that clearly never came to pass (so far, at least). From Archigram’s walking cities to Superstudio’s vision of a sleek life support grid spreading through the landscape, and the Smithsons’ famous 1956 House of the Future, these make for great if familiar retro future images that are always a pleasure to peruse again. The inclusion of Villa Arpel from Jacques Tati’s 1958 film Mon Oncle, in which modern technology comically causes trouble, is a particular joy.
But as this endearingly meandering show makes clear, what’s rather more remarkable is how much of what seemed so unlikely turned out to be, if not entirely accurate, than strangely prescient, from omnipresent surveillance and screens to fully-automated houses, domestic robots, and micro living spaces.
(...)
Ugo La Pietra’s Telematic House from the 1983 Milan Furniture Fair is particularly fascinating. In this, telescreens are incorporated everywhere within the furniture to dominate the domestic environment, anticipating our current screen-obsessed lives to an extent, but never imagining that technology would become mobile rather than static. The Environment Transformers’ ‘wearable architecture’ headsets of 1968 prefigured some aspects of augmented reality while Dunne & Raby’s Technological Dreams explores the complicated matter of human-robot dependencies.
At a time when digital natives in particular increasingly live with fewer physical possessions and in more compact homes, it’s fascinating to look at past visions that explored these ideas. Sottsass’ Micro-Environment, for example, was designed to liberate the home from consumer goods while Joe Colombo’s 1.5m3 Mini-Kitchen of 1963 and his Total Furnishing Unit from 1972 compressed all the house’s functions into a single piece of multi-functional furniture. Presented in The Architecture of Minimum Dwelling, a recent project by Pier Vittorio Aureli and Martino Tattara of Dogma, are 48 examples of minimal living - ranging from a monk’s cell to contemporary co-living. We are asked to consider whether there is an absolute minimum, and whether squeezing more functionality out of less space still responds to our human needs....
0 notes
Photo
Kersten Geers, EPFL, 2014, Architecture Without Content 9: The difficult Double
https://www.learningforms.org/architecture-without-content-9-the-difficult-double/
Invitation de 20 architectes invités à parler d’un autre architecte.
Pour Jacques Lucan, cela montre chez cette génération d’architecte de la conciliation entre nécessité de la culture et nécessité de se déprendre. Une aporie / paradoxe.
1- Pier Paolo Tamburelli : McKim Mead and White
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuU0mfkLl7M
2- Pascal Flammer : Kazuo Shinohara
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1ehXlTjuYY
3- Jan de Vylder : Eric Owen Moss
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl_15UGCCDY
4- Yoshiharu Tsukamoto (atelier Bow-Wow) : Robert Venturi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jmIW9Js9PA
5- Martino Tattara (DOGMA) : Giovanni Battista Piranesi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4r5R7zANOI
6- Emanuel Christ (Christ & Gantenbein) : Hans Poelzig
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jmIW9Js9PA
7- Frida Escobedo : Alvaro Siza
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umSGsN5o2BU
8- Oliver Thill (Atelier Kempe Thill) x Heinrich Tessenow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obxV0JGh_RQ
9- Mark Lee (Johnston Marklee) x Frank O. Gehry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6nyUQwxw_c
10- Michael Meredith (MOS) x The New York Five
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2c9QLnIPM8
11- Go Hasegawa x Kazunari Sakamoto
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2c9QLnIPM8
12- Wilfried Kuehn (KuehnMalvezzi) x Carlo Molino
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRAsgF9BqPc
13- Elli Mosayebi (EMI Architekten) x Luigi Caccia Dominioni
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdhRybvUW6A
14- Wonne Ickx (Productora) x Ricardo Legorreta
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeSSdTy53Xw&list=PLmNCkXSZPShoOakmzUL-o3KOAaVU6cXeo&index=7
15- Sam Jacob (FAT Architecture) x John Soane
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5Cgm3kmoXA&list=PLmNCkXSZPShoOakmzUL-o3KOAaVU6cXeo&index=8
16- Bijoy Jain (Studio Mumbai) x Louis I. Kahn
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ax0mTBpAzEg&index=9&list=PLmNCkXSZPShoOakmzUL-o3KOAaVU6cXeo
17- Bas Princen x Luigi Ghirri
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQbYb0Dyexc&index=12&list=PLmNCkXSZPShoOakmzUL-o3KOAaVU6cXeo
18- Point Supreme x Elia Zenghelis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HuhymR-X14&index=14&list=PLmNCkXSZPShoOakmzUL-o3KOAaVU6cXeo
19- Faiden x Abalos - Herreros
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HulpHm44Krg&list=PLmNCkXSZPShoOakmzUL-o3KOAaVU6cXeo&index=19
20- François Charbonnet (Made In Sarl) x Jean Nouvel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wy5k5wltajM&list=PLmNCkXSZPShoOakmzUL-o3KOAaVU6cXeo&index=20
0 notes
Photo
‘Ilha’ typologies study - a specific form of domestic space from Porto.
It is an old form of worker’s housing in the city, a compact and dense typology that resists in many parts of the city centre.Most of the typologies of the living space are defined by a long and narrow patio, along which units of which approximately 5x5m are located in which an entire family used to live whilst the laundry and toilets were shared. Nowadays, fewer people live in each unit due to the poor conditions.
Despite its neglected conditions, this way of living is very dense, minimizing private space, enlarging the collective space and it is affordable.
Porto Academy 2016 / Martino Tattara - Dogma
https://issuu.com/indexnewspaper/docs/pa16_issuu_martinotattara
ⓒ Alexandra Totoianu
0 notes
Photo
http://www.dogma.name/index.html
1 note
·
View note
Photo
Dogma
23 notes
·
View notes
Photo
DOGMA, Magnet, Masterplan for a new residential development, Bienne, 2014
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
“These houses can be conceived as flexible compositions of rooms that can be united into bigger units or remain independent cells. These rooms are no longer “domestic spaces,” but generic inhabitable spaces that can be used as a both houses or workplaces. The principle of “equal rooms” that can eventually be connected to form larger units is a way to counter the functional and gender specificity of domestic space, and to make housing adaptable for forms of life beyond the family.” (Pier Vittorio Aureli, Martino Tattara, 5)
1 note
·
View note