#MMWR Booster
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
broadlyepi · 9 months ago
Text
MMWR Booster for: Federal Retail Pharmacy Program Contributions to Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 Vaccinations Across Sociodemographic Characteristics — United States, September 1, 2022–September 30, 2023 / Weekly / April 4, 2024 / 73(13);286–290
Top 5 Takeaways
Significant Contribution by FRPP: The Federal Retail Pharmacy Program (FRPP) partners administered 67.7% of the 59.8 million COVID-19 bivalent vaccine doses in the U.S. during the study period.
Variation Across Age Groups: The highest uptake of bivalent vaccine doses administered by FRPP partners was observed among adults aged 18–49 years (70.6%), while the lowest was among children aged 6 months–4 years (5.9%).
Equitable Access Across Racial and Ethnic Groups: FRPP partners administered a significant portion of bivalent doses to racial and ethnic minority groups, demonstrating a key role in ensuring equitable vaccine access.
Urban vs. Rural Distribution: FRPP partners administered a higher proportion of bivalent doses in urban areas (81.6%) compared to rural areas (60.0%), highlighting differences in pharmacy accessibility.
Potential Model for Future Public Health Responses: The success of the FRPP in administering bivalent COVID-19 vaccine doses suggests it could serve as a model for future vaccine-preventable disease responses.
Original Article Author and Citation
Corresponding Author
Roua El Kalach, PharmD, [email protected]
Suggested Citation
El Kalach R, Jones-Jack N, Elam MA, et al. Federal Retail Pharmacy Program Contributions to Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 Vaccinations Across Sociodemographic Characteristics — United States, September 1, 2022–September 30, 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2024;73:286–290. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7313a2.
Summary
This study evaluates the Federal Retail Pharmacy Program's contribution to administering COVID-19 bivalent mRNA vaccine doses across various sociodemographic groups in the U.S. from September 1, 2022, to September 30, 2023. It found that 67.7% of the total 59.8 million doses were administered by FRPP partners, with significant variations across age groups, and equitable access across racial and ethnic groups.
Methods
The analysis utilized two data sources: FRPP bivalent dose administration data reported directly to CDC and all-provider data on bivalent vaccine dose administration reported to CDC by each jurisdiction. It examined the proportion of doses administered by FRPP partners across different age cohorts, sexes, racial and ethnic groups, and urban-rural classifications.
Discussion
The FRPP's substantial role in administering bivalent doses indicates its effectiveness in making COVID-19 vaccines accessible across the U.S. Differences in vaccine uptake among different demographic groups highlight areas for further investigation and potential improvement in public health strategies.
Conclusion
The Federal Retail Pharmacy Program has been crucial in ensuring access to bivalent COVID-19 vaccinations across the U.S., demonstrating the potential for pharmacies to play a key role in future public health responses. Further strategies are needed to improve data collection and reporting, especially in pharmacy settings, to guide public health practices effectively.
This has been your booster shot of MMWR Info! Please check back for more MMWR, Public Health, and Programming Tutorial content daily.
6 notes · View notes
covid-safer-hotties · 2 months ago
Text
Also preserved in our archive (Daily updates!)
By Stephanie Soucheray, MA
During the 2023-24 cold and flu season, healthcare workers, including nursing home personnel and staff, had low uptake of COVID-19 vaccine booster doses and seasonal flu vaccines, despite a consistent recommendation from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to stay up to date on those vaccines.
The findings, published yesterday in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, showed regional differences in uptake.
The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) tracks vaccination among healthcare workers in hospitals, clinics, and nursing homes. From October 2023 to March 2024, NHSN defined up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination as receipt of a 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccine, and up-to-date seasonal flu vaccine with that season's immunization.
Among approximately 8.8 million healthcare personnel working in more than 4,000 acute care hospitals, flu vaccine coverage was 80.7%. Among approximately 2.1 million healthcare personnel working in 14,294 nursing homes, flu vaccine coverage was 45.4%.
COVID vaccine uptake lower than for flu COVID vaccine uptake was much lower. Among the employees working in acute care hospitals, only 15.3% were vaccinated. The percentage was even lower in nursing homes, at 10.5% overall.
Uptake of COVID-19 vaccines was highest in the Pacific region for both acute care hospital staff and nursing home staff. Uptake was lowest in Mountain and Southern states, the authors said.
For the flu vaccine, uptake was highest in the Mountain region (84.5%) and lowest in the Pacific region (74.3%) for acute care hospitals. Vaccination coverage was highest in the Northeast region (58.6%) and lowest in the South region (38.1%) for nursing homes.
The authors said uptake in COVID-19 vaccines decreased sharply from the previous year.
"Coverage with COVID-19 vaccination among healthcare personnel in nursing homes decreased from 22.8% during the 2022–23 respiratory virus season to 10.5% during the 2023–24 respiratory virus season," they wrote. "Like findings in previous studies, the current findings highlight the need to further investigate barriers to vaccination among health care personnel and identify additional strategies to address these challenges.
Study link: www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/mm7343a2.htm
19 notes · View notes
spooniestrong · 6 months ago
Text
Make your voice heard and ask the CDC to:
Recommend updated 2024-2025 COVID vaccines for all ages AND
Strengthen our vaccine drive by recommending more frequent boosting (at least every six months) and more frequent updates to the vaccines, adjusted for the latest variants.
Submit a public comment using our sample language below.
You can also register to give Oral Public Comment at the upcoming June 26-28 online CDC ACIP Meeting at: https://www2.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/acip_publiccomment.asp 
Submit written comments and/or register to make oral comments at the meeting by Monday, June 17 at 11:59pm Eastern Standard Time.
It’s important to submit a personalized comment, which can be brief. Ideas for a personalized comment:
How you, your family, or your community would be impacted by fall vaccine eligibility being restricted to only high risk groups (such as older age or immunocompromised status)
Barriers to vaccination your have faced, particularly if your eligibility was questioned or misinterpreted by a vaccine provider
How out-of-pocket costs are a barrier to getting the latest vaccines
Also feel free to take inspiration from or borrow the language in our sample public comment below.
Docket No. CDC–2024–0043
Updated 2024-2025 COVID vaccines must be recommended for people of all ages, regardless of health status. A restrictive approach to eligibility would create undue barriers for vulnerable people and discourage high risk people from getting needed vaccine boosters.
The vaccine schedule should address waning efficacy in the months following vaccination [1-3] as well as emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 strains by recommending updated vaccination for all ages, at least every six months. Recent vaccination is also associated with a lower risk of developing Long COVID following a COVID infection [4] as well as a lower risk of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in children (MIS-C) [5]. 
The CDC’s clear and unequivocal recommendation of updated COVID vaccination for all ages will influence what healthcare providers recommend, and what health insurances cover. Moreover, it will improve public awareness regarding the need for updated vaccination.
The CDC must ensure equitable and affordable access to updated vaccines and prevent limited access because of financial constraints or demographics. The CDC’s Bridge vaccine access program is slated to end August 2024 and must be extended to ensure uninsured and underinsured people have access to the updated vaccines this fall [6].
References:
1. Link-Gelles R. Effectiveness of COVID-19 (2023-2024 Formula) vaccines. Presented at: FDA VRBPAC Meeting; June 5, 2024. Accessed June 12, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/media/179140/download
2. Wu N, Joyal-Desmarais K, Vieira AM, et al. COVID-19 boosters versus primary series: update to a living review. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2023;11(10):e87-e88. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00265-5
3. Menegale F, Manica M, Zardini A, et al. Evaluation of Waning of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine–Induced Immunity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(5):e2310650. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10650
4. Fang Z, Ahrnsbrak R, Rekito A. Evidence Mounts That About 7% of US Adults Have Had Long COVID. JAMA. Published online June 7, 2024. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.11370
5.  Yousaf AR. Notes from the Field: Surveillance for Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children — United States, 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2024;73. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7310a2
6. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/bridge/index.html 
Full instructions for written and oral comment and meeting information can be found at: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/index.html
You can also register to give Oral Public Comment at the upcoming June 26-28 online CDC ACIP Meeting at: https://www2.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/acip_publiccomment.asp 
You must register by June 17 at 11:59pm Eastern Standard Time
CDC’s ACIP meeting information on the Federal Register: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/05/24/2024-11439/meeting-of-the-advisory-committee-on-immunization-practices 
Vaccination with the latest updated vaccines continues to be foundational to a multilayered approach to COVID, providing protection against both acute disease and Long COVID. Far too few Americans have received the latest vaccines. Only approximately 22.6% of adults and 14.8% of children have received the latest 2023-2024 vaccines (as of June 1, 2024), which have been available since Fall 2023. COVID vaccination rates in both groups lags far behind influenza vaccination rates. Only 7.1% of adults aged 65 and older received the recommended two doses of the 2023-2024 vaccine (as of April 27, 2024).
Vaccine efficacy wanes significantly four to six months following vaccination, making updated vaccination important for all people as COVID continues to spread in our communities. Vaccine approaches that restrict access based on age or risk status put all of us at risk and leave those at high risk of severe consequences of COVID infection confused about whether they qualify to receive additional doses. A more frequent vaccination approach providing vaccination at least every six months as well as frequent updates to match current variants is needed to better protect all of us amid year-round COVID spread.
The CDC’s Bridge Access Program, which provides COVID vaccines to uninsured and underinsured adults free of charge, is due to end August 2024. The end of this program will unnecessarily put vulnerable people at risk, and public health officials must advocate for continuation and expansion of this program.
Submitted written comments or registration to make oral comments at the meeting must be received by the CDC no later than June 17 at 11:59pm Eastern Standard Time
28 notes · View notes
havegaysex · 6 months ago
Text
Comment period Ends June 17th 2024 Copied directly from the People's CDC website https://peoplescdc.org/2024/06/13/acip/ Also feel free to take inspiration from or borrow the language in our sample public comment below. Docket No. CDC–2024–0043 Updated 2024-2025 COVID vaccines must be recommended for people of all ages, regardless of health status. A restrictive approach to eligibility would create undue barriers for vulnerable people and discourage high risk people from getting needed vaccine boosters. The vaccine schedule should address waning efficacy in the months following vaccination [1-3] as well as emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 strains by recommending updated vaccination for all ages, at least every six months. Recent vaccination is also associated with a lower risk of developing Long COVID following a COVID infection [4] as well as a lower risk of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in children (MIS-C) [5]. The CDC’s clear and unequivocal recommendation of updated COVID vaccination for all ages will influence what healthcare providers recommend, and what health insurances cover. Moreover, it will improve public awareness regarding the need for updated vaccination. The CDC must ensure equitable and affordable access to updated vaccines and prevent limited access because of financial constraints or demographics. The CDC’s Bridge vaccine access program is slated to end August 2024 and must be extended to ensure uninsured and underinsured people have access to the updated vaccines this fall [6]. References: 1. Link-Gelles R. Effectiveness of COVID-19 (2023-2024 Formula) vaccines. Presented at: FDA VRBPAC Meeting; June 5, 2024. Accessed June 12, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/media/179140/download Wu N, Joyal-Desmarais K, Vieira AM, et al. COVID-19 boosters versus primary series: update to a living review. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2023;11(10):e87-e88. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00265-5 Menegale F, Manica M, Zardini A, et al. Evaluation of Waning of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine–Induced Immunity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(5):e2310650. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10650 Fang Z, Ahrnsbrak R, Rekito A. Evidence Mounts That About 7% of US Adults Have Had Long COVID. JAMA. Published online June 7, 2024. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.11370 Yousaf AR. Notes from the Field: Surveillance for Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children — United States, 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2024;73. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7310a2 https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/bridge/index.html Full instructions for written and oral comment and meeting information can be found at: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/index.html You can also register to give Oral Public Comment at the upcoming June 26-28 online CDC ACIP Meeting at: https://www2.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/acip_publiccomment.asp You must register by June 17 at 11:59pm Eastern Standard Time CDC’s ACIP meeting information on the Federal Register: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/05/24/2024-11439/meeting-of-the-advisory-committee-on-immunization-practices
Why? WHY??
U.S. CDC taking comments on potentially limiting COVID vaccine availbility by age or health status. Never mind that the vaccine is crucial to limiting long-term effects that could lead to immunocomprimisation. 🤬🤬🤬
Tumblr media Tumblr media
You can comment here.
8K notes · View notes
longwindedbore · 1 year ago
Text
Cold hard facts about Covid
‘Overall mortality rates among unvaccinated persons were 14.1 times the rates among bivalent vaccine recipients; mortality rates among monovalent-only vaccine recipients were 2.6 times the rates among bivalent vaccine recipients’ {1}
‘The 65 and older age group also constituted 61% of intensive care unit admissions and nearly 90% of COVID-19-related deaths.’ {2}
‘Despite their higher risk, federal data show only about 43% of adults aged 65 and older received the previous bivalent booster shot which was available from September 2022 to May of this year. Among those hospitalized, 16% had not received any COVID-19 vaccination at all.’ {2}
======================================
Maybe it’s all the lead from car exhausts and factory smoke stacks we boomers inhaled for three decades. As well as the lead in the yellow paint on the pencils we chewed like beavers in school.
Or maybe it’s a streak of ornery contentiousness in rural/suburban AmeriKKKa. Our small town doctor quietly coming to our home to inoculate me and my brother with the polio vaccine?
‘anti-vaccination movements had gained momentum in the early 20th century, questioning "the state's authority to require parents to get their children vaccinated, on the grounds that that is authoritarianism." {3}
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
{1} ——-https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/72/wr/mm7206a3.htm
{2}——-https://www.sfchronicle.com/health/article/dying-covid-now-new-study-shows-who-s-highest-18409105.php
{3}———https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-june-9-2020-1.5604421/polio-vaccine-set-off-wave-of-relief-and-a-wave-of-resistance-covid-19-era-may-be-similar-says-jill-lepore-1.5604925
0 notes
rnewspost · 2 years ago
Text
Bivalent booster recipients show slightly higher protection against infection and significantly higher protection against death than monovalent booster recipients
In a recent report published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), researchers reported on the immune protection conferred by monovalent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines and bivalent booster doses. Study: COVID-19 Incidence and Mortality Among Unvaccinated and Vaccinated Persons Aged ≥12 Years by Receipt of…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
reportwire · 3 years ago
Text
Use of Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccines: Updated Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, 2019
Use of Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccines: Updated Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, 2019
Summary of Key Findings Safety and immunogenicity. Two clinical trials found no increased risk for adverse events among adults who received Tdap, compared with those who received Td 10 years after receipt of the initial Tdap dose (30,31). In addition, the proportion of persons with seroprotective levels of antibodies to tetanus and diphtheria was similar in the Tdap and Td groups. Another…
View On WordPress
0 notes
ghostofasecretary · 1 year ago
Text
Based on the information I was able to find it is possible that ACIP will restrict recommending updated vaccines for those 65+, but 75+ seems to be an off the cuff comment from Dr. Paul Offit, not from the CDC. Here is the current ACIP Interim Recommendation that will presumably be voted on September 12th: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/72/wr/mm7224a3.htm. The quote in many of these Tweets is from a PBS article (https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/your-fall-guide-to-covid-rsv-and-flu-vaccines) and it is indirectly quoting FDA Vaccine Advisor Dr. Paul Offit. This article from fiercehealthcare.com contains more information about Dr. Offit and recent discussions, which indicate that the idea is to shift from boosters to a single “harmonized” bivalent vaccine given yearly to most individuals, with boosters available for vulnerable groups. Here is a 27 minute conversation with him held in early February of this year. In the first few minutes, he states that Covid-19 will be with us for a very long time; that he believes it is important to target intense interventions towards the most vulnerable members of our population; and that the main benefit of vaccination here is to prevent severe disease. He does not believe Covid is over, and he seems to think one vaccine will have higher uptake than previous vaccine recommendations. The comment due date is September 8th. The comments I read earlier today were wild. They ranged from the charmingly brief asshole who took time out of their day to write just “I will not comply;” to people talking about vaccine harm (arguing both for and against the current recommendations, depending on the person writing); to people like us who would like more vaccinations rather than fewer. I think it’s worthwhile for those of us who are still concerned about Covid-19 to comment, and that we do it off of more information than one quote from a PBS article.
The CDC is trying to limit the new COVID booster to only people 75+, pregnant people, and the immunocompromised.
We have two days (as of September 6th, 2023) to let them know this isn't acceptable.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Direct link to the page to submit your comments: click here!
Please, PLEASE fill this out and boost this post!
10K notes · View notes
health28 · 2 years ago
Text
Serious health events rare in children after COVID-19 vaccine booster, says CDC study
Serious health events rare in children after COVID-19 vaccine booster, says CDC study
In a recent Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) published on the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention (US-CDC) website, researchers published the effects of a homologous booster dose of the BNT162b2 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine in children aged five to 11 years. Study: Safety Monitoring of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Doses Among Children…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
broadlyepi · 1 year ago
Text
MMWR Booster #10: Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Coinfection and Clinical Characteristics Among Children and Adolescents Aged <18 Years Who Were Hospitalized or Died with Influenza — United States, 2021–22 Influenza Season
Top 5 Takeaways
6% of pediatric influenza hospitalizations had concurrent SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) coinfection during the 2021–22 influenza season.
Coinfected patients exhibited a higher need for respiratory support (invasive or noninvasive) compared to those with influenza only.
Among pediatric deaths linked to influenza, 16% had SARS-CoV-2 coinfection; vaccination and antiviral use were notably low in these cases.
Data from the CDC's surveillance networks highlighted the importance of dual-testing for influenza and SARS-CoV-2 in pediatric patients with respiratory symptoms.
The report underscores the need for preventive strategies like vaccinations and mask use during high respiratory virus circulation periods.
link: BroadlyEpi.com
Enjoying these summaries? Check back every day at 8am and 4pm Pacific Time (UTC - 8) for a new MMWR Booster. A reblog would also be greatly appreciated, and thanks to everyone who already has! BroadlyEpi hopes to make Epidemiology and Public Health more approachable to anyone who's interested.
9 notes · View notes
cultistsonly · 3 years ago
Text
I agree with the sentiment of this post but I did some further digging and it’s not quite accurate.
Here is the actual study the misquoted “75% of people who die of COVID have 4+ comorbidities” statistic comes from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/pdfs/mm7101a4-H.pdf
Important notes:
- The study’s sample was 1.2 million vaccinated people. Over the course of the study 36 died of Covid-19 and 28 of those people had four or more of the comorbidities.
- the above list of comorbidities was not the one the study was using. Their list only included the factors most closely linked to Covid-19 deaths. (For the record, I still fall into one of these groups.)
- the conclusion argues for more care and assistance for people who are at higher risk. Here is a summary pulled straight from the article:
“Summary
What is already known about this topic?
COVID-19 vaccines are highly effective against COVID-19-associted hospitalization and death.
What is added by this report?
Among 1,228,664 persons who completed primary vaccination during December 2020-October 2021, severe COVID-19-associated outcomes (0.015%) or death (0.0033%) were rare. Risk factors for severe outcomes included age ≥65 years, immunosuppressed, and six other underlying conditions. All persons with severe outcomes had at least one risk factor; 78% of persons who died had at least four.
What are the implications for public health practice?
Vaccinated persons who are older, immunosuppressed, or haveother underlying conditions should receive targeted interventons including chronic disease management, precautions to reduce exposure, additional primary and booster vaccine doses, and effective pharmaceutical therapy to mitigate risk for severe outcomes. Increasing vaccination coverage is a critical public health priority.”
The way the US treats disabled people is horrible and it fails them every day, in terms of the pandemic and in general. This is not an argument that some loses are acceptable. The data shows that vaccines are effective, not that Covid isn’t dangerous. The people using this to argue that completely reopening is safe are flat out wrong about what it says, and would rather risk their lives and others than do the bear minimum for the public good.
It’s not “encouraging” that “people with 4+ comorbidities” are most of the people who die with Covid.
People saying it’s “encouraging” that most deaths are people with 4 or more comorbidities are trying to imply that only disabled people are going to die.
And I’m glad a lot of you are on board with the fact that it’s fucking evil to cheer for the idea that vulnerable people will be most affected.
It’s also just not true.
You as a healthy abled person can easily have 4+ of these comorbidities.
The CDC’s list of “comorbidities” (not to be confused with “underlying conditions”, they’re different) is 152 pages long and includes things like:
lactose intolerance
marijuana use
mild depressive episode
pollen allergy
“obesity”
vaginal/vulval yeast infection
autism/”childhood autism”/Asperger’s
“short stature not otherwise classified”
migraines, also, headache (they’re 2 different ones)
insomnia
tinnitis
gerd (a common type of acid reflux)
constipation
acne
“pain in joint”
“pain in limb”
“low back pain”
UTI
heavy periods
cough
hiccough
sneezing
urinary incontinence or retention
eating “too much” or too little
broken bones
medication overdoses
drug “of addictive potential” in bloodstream
traffic accident
fall
“contact with hot tap water”
and just… basically anything medical or medicalized that a person can have.
Ever told a doctor literally anything about your body? You probably have four or more of these.
Anything in your chart is a comorbidity, even your lactose intolerance or your acne.
While some conditions on the list might mean you’re more likely to get severely ill, many of them really don’t. They aren’t meant to - that’s not what the list IS.
It’s just a list of conditions that were in a patient’s chart when they died.
The idea that “people with 4+ comorbidities are 75% of deaths” means “most people are safe” is complete and utter nonsense.
A lot of people are going to die in the next few months, and the official story is that they were going to die anyways because they were already just so sick before covid! so YOU shouldn’t try to be careful or agitate for better covid protection! because YOU aren’t at risk! (unless you’re one of those disableds we’ve already written off.)
It’s fucking bullshit, and it’s eugenicist bullshit trying to train you to see disabled lives as unworthy of protection. Don’t fall for it.
9K notes · View notes
mariebenz · 3 years ago
Text
CDC: Effectiveness of COVID-19 Booster Wanes with Time But Still Best Protection Against Severe Illness
Tumblr media
MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Dr. Mark G. Thompson, PhD Deputy Chief – Science COVID-19 Response Team CDC Influenza Division MedicalResearch.com:  What is the background for this study?  - Protection against COVID-19 after 2 doses of mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) wanes, but little is known about durability of protection after 3 doses. - CDC conducted a multistate analysis of emergency department (ED) visits, urgent care (UC) visits, and hospitalizations from August 26, 2021–January 22, 2022. Among adults who had either received two or three doses of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, effectiveness waned over time. MedicalResearch.com:  What are the main findings? - Getting a third dose was still highly effective at preventing COVID-19 hospitalizations during this period. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) waned over time since receiving the second dose, increased after getting a third dose, and then waned over time since getting a third dose. During the Omicron period, VE against hospitalization was 91% during the first 2 months after a third dose and decreased to 78% after more than 4 months. Comparatively, VE against ED/UC visits was 87% during the first two months after a third dose and decreased to 66% after 4 to 5 months. Overall, VE was higher for protection against hospitalizations than against ED/UC visits. Although protection waned with time, these findings show receipt of a third dose of mRNA vaccines remains highly effective at preventing severe COVID-19.  All people should remain up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccinations to best protect against severe illness with COVID-19.  MedicalResearch.com: What should readers take away from your report? - COVID-19 boosters are effective, and CDC continues to recommend everyone 5 and older remain up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccinations, to ensure the best possible protection against severe COVID-19 illness. For most people, that means getting a booster dose 5 months after receiving an mRNA vaccine or 2 months after receiving Johnson and Johnson’s Janssen vaccine. - CDC is continuing to closely monitor the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines to help inform public health efforts.  MedicalResearch.com: What recommendations do you have for future research as a result of this work? - This data was part of CDC’s COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness research, and we’ll continue to use these systems to study how COVID-19 vaccines perform in real life.   No disclosures: Citation: Ferdinands JM, Rao S, Dixon BE, et al. Waning 2-Dose and 3-Dose Effectiveness of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19–Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Adults During Periods of Delta and Omicron Variant Predominance — VISION Network, 10 States, August 2021–January 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. ePub: 11 February 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7107e2  The information on MedicalResearch.com is provided for educational purposes only, and is in no way intended to diagnose, cure, or treat any medical or other condition. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health and ask your doctor any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. In addition to all other limitations and disclaimers in this agreement, service provider and its third party providers disclaim any liability or loss in connection with the content provided on this website.   Read the full article
0 notes
mhealthyliving · 3 years ago
Text
Three New Studies Confirm Power of Booster Shots Against Omicron
Three New Studies Confirm Power of Booster Shots Against Omicron
By Robin Foster HealthDay Reporter FRIDAY, Jan. 21, 2022 — Booster shots are keeping the Omicron variant from landing millions of Americans in hospitals, emergency rooms and urgent care clinics across the country, three new government studies show. In one study, published Friday in the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), a third dose of…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
bubblebunsss · 3 years ago
Text
COVID-19 Update Eps. 3
Wawwww.. Baru buka data-data maning trus mengkaget ternyata Amrik sedang memasuki gelombang tsunami kedua.
Tumblr media
Bahkan rerata kematian per 7 harinya masih sama dengan sebelum vaksinasi 1.485 dan 1.544 di rerata kasus 160.000.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Fully vaccinatednya mana tinggi banget 53%. Pantesan kemaren pada mau minta booster, ternyata ada kasus setinggi ini ges..
Tumblr media
Lama juga ga buka email MMWR CDC. Panteslah gua ketemu banyak komentar miring soal vaksin di kolom replynya para nakes dan ilmuwan yang promote vaksin.
But hey, dont forget. Kasus banyak ini karena pembukaan banyak sektor yang mengakibatkan banyak orang-orang yang ga mau atau ga bisa divaksin jadi harus terpapar. Oh, kini aku baru tau kenapa CDC promote masker lagi.
Tumblr media
Lesson learned: mok kate kasus udah turun, mok kate PPKM turun level, masker is a must and please avoid the crowded setting (padahal pekan lalu sempet kendor ngemall dan bulan depan pen pulkam huhuhu, gagal maning maning maning gagal). The at least 1 dose vaccinated and the fully vaccinated person still have the probability to be hospitalized even if 17x less likely. Bertahanlah jiwa jiwa demen mengembara!
0 notes
steveemfield · 3 years ago
Text
The CDC is pushing EVERYONE to be vaccinated. First, they stressed movement toward herd immunity which Fauci at the NIH told us masks were useless. Now the CDC wants "unapproved" vaxes shot into everyone's arm, denies herd immunity and even long-term immunity, while Fauci and the NIH want nearly-constant masks, even at home, and multiple masks.
You would think the public would be confused.
While pushing universal vaccinations, the CDC admits there is no conclusive data to support their claim that the unvaccinated are causing the spread of Covid, but blame the non-jabbers anyway -- in the same report!:
Currently, limited evidence concerning the protection afforded by vaccination against reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 is available.(MMWR, CDC, 8/6/21)
Similarly, we were told that one shot would do the trick (without efficacy data), then two shots, then a third booster, in conjunction with a new flu shot every year, etc. These unapproved products-for-profit are being bundled and COERCED into our bodies with all kinds of threats, contradictory positions, and data based on tests now rejected by, guess who, the CDC itself.
0 notes
broadlyepi · 1 year ago
Text
MMWR Booster #1: Early Estimates of Bivalent mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness in Preventing COVID-19–Associated Emergency Department or Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Immunocompetent Adults
Top 5 Takeaways
1. Effectiveness of Bivalent mRNA Vaccine: The bivalent mRNA vaccine, which includes a component against the Omicron BA.4/BA.5 sublineages, was found to be effective in preventing COVID-19–related medical encounters and hospitalizations among immunocompetent adults. 2. Comparative Vaccine Effectiveness (VE): VE of the bivalent booster, after 2, 3, or 4 monovalent doses, was significant against emergency department/urgent care encounters and hospitalizations when compared with no vaccination or only monovalent vaccination. 3. Duration of Protection: The relative protection offered by the bivalent vaccine increased with time elapsed since the last monovalent dose, suggesting waning immunity from the monovalent vaccine. 4. Study Period and Context: The study was conducted during the prevalence of the Omicron BA.5 sublineage and other Omicron sublineages in the U.S., from September to November 2022. 5. Limitations and Future Research: The study acknowledges limitations like not accounting for previous SARS-CoV-2 infections and potential residual confounding factors. Further research is needed to determine the long-term effectiveness of the bivalent vaccine and its optimal timing. Link: BroadlyEpi.com
4 notes · View notes