Tumgik
#Lobachevskian
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Euclid’s 5 postulates (and the Hyperbolic axiom of parallelism that replaces the 5th to create Lobachevskian geometry)
258 notes · View notes
robinoakapple · 2 years
Video
youtube
I returned to the Earth to rebirth the hyperbolic Sewed my con in the tract while you were sitting diastolic Lobachevskian fields betray the inharmonic And Teutonic motivations Of the legions growing on it
0 notes
historical-babes · 4 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Nikolai Lobachevsky (1792-1856).
Russian mathematician.
.
He was a Russian mathematician and geometer, known primarily for his work on hyperbolic geometry, otherwise known as Lobachevskian geometry and also his fundamental study on Dirichlet integrals known as Lobachevsky integral formula.
.
Lobachevsky received a Master of Science in physics and mathematics at Kazan University in 1811. In 1814, he became a lecturer there, in 1816 he was promoted to associate professor. In 1822, at the age of 30, he became a full professor, teaching mathematics, physics, and astronomy. He served in many administrative positions and became the rector of Kazan University in 1827.
.
In 1832, he married Varvara Alexeyevna Moiseyeva. They had a large number of children (eighteen according to his son's memoirs, while only seven apparently survived into adulthood).
.
He was dismissed from the university in 1846, ostensibly due to his deteriorating health: by the early 1850s, he was nearly blind and unable to walk. He died in poverty in 1856.
.
Lobachevsky's main achievement is the development (independently from János Bolyai) of a non-Euclidean geometry, also referred to as Lobachevskian geometry.
[Submission]
36 notes · View notes
thefearofcod · 8 years
Text
You know what’s total bunk? Lovecraft LIED to me! I shouldn’t be able to swing a cat without hitting something eldritch and down a well! This is rural goddamn New England! I should know five people who’ve got fishmen in their family! I should BE a fishman! WHERES MY NONEUCLIDIAN BOYFRIEND, HOWARD.
213 notes · View notes
missintfan · 6 years
Text
EXO MVs theory [let’s call it that]
Today I suddenly thought that it is possible EXO MVs are happening not in two realities, one real and another a computer game [although by far it is the most potent and suitable theory which I love most], but rather action takes place in a multidimensional universe. The goal of many EXO space-related and travel-related MVs is definitely looking for lost love (”I’ll cross the universe for you”), and in Lucky One there was something about bending parallel lines to find the loved one (although that are actually things that happen in space, Lobachevskian geometry, and not, I guess, dimension-crossing thing). So my strangest and nerdiest guess is they are travelling through dimensions in search of someone they love.
4 notes · View notes
mathematicianadda · 4 years
Text
The Big Lock-Down Math-Off, Match 26
Welcome to the twenty-sixth and final match in this year’s Big Math-Off. Take a look at the two interesting bits of maths below, and vote for your favourite.
Here are today’s two pitches.
Colin Beveridge – The Miracle Sudoku
Colin blogs at flyingcoloursmaths.co.uk and tweets at @icecolbeveridge.
You’ve seen the Miracle Sudoku video, right? If not, watch the Miracle Sudoku video. I was skeptical, but it was absolutely worth 25 minutes of my time.
youtube
If you can’t be bothered to watch, the puzzle in question is a sudoku with three additional rules:
No two cells separated by a chess king’s move may contain the same digit
No two cells separated by a knight’s move may contain the same digit
No two vertically/horizontally adjacent cells may contain consecutive digits.
(Try it yourself here!)
At the risk of minor spoilers, the solver in the video is skeptical that the puzzle presented can be solved; it has only two clues, and he suspects he is being trolled. Yet the puzzle can indeed be solved! Which, of course made me wonder: how many such puzzles are there?
I’ve put my only-really-meant-for-me code here.
As @realityminus3 has pointed out at least once, counting is hard, so I made a computer do it. It turns out, there are only 72 possible ‘miracle’ grids.
But wait, there’s more!
(Not more grids. More analysis.)
Is there some way of generating miracle grids? . When I looked closely at the 72 possibilities, some things looked… awfully familiar. Repetitive, even.
For example, every sudoku (not just the miracle flavour) has one column that starts with a 9 and one column that ends in a 9; the same is true for rows – and for any digit: I just happened to pick 9. Let’s call those the 9-strings.
In all of the miracle grids, the four 9-strings (in some order) are
936|471|825,
948|372|615,
951|627|384 and
963|528|174
… and the middle two of those cracked it open!
How? Look at the alternate digits: in the second one, you’ll see 9-8|-7-|6-5 and -4-|3-2|-1-; in the third, it’s 9-1|-2-|3-4 and -5-|6-7|-8-: you just count up or down, skipping a space each time.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Looking more closely at each grid, either the rows or the columns do the skip-counting, and all in the same direction. This is how we build it!
Pick a digit to go in the top-left corner. (Say 1. It doesn’t really matter.) Using the skip-counting, fill in the top row as 162|738|495.
Now, where’s the first place the 1 can go in the second row? It can’t go in the first three spaces because there would be two 1s in the first box, so the first place it can go is in the fourth column. Putting the 1 there means filling out the second row as 495|162|738 (the first row moved on by three spaces).
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Similarly, the first place the 1 of the third row can go is in column seven, and the third row is again a simple twist of the first: 738|495|162.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
The same logic continues down the grid: the first place a 1 can go in row four is column 2 (516|273|849), and the first place in row 5 is position 5 (849|516|273).
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
You can probably complete the grid by yourself from there:
There are eight ways to reflect and/or rotate the grid (the 1 you started with could go in any of the four corners, and the 162 could go vertically or horizontally), and nine digits you could start from in the top left – accounting for all 72 possible grids!
Easter Eggs and Open Questions
Pick a position in a 3-by-3 box – say the top middle. Write out the digits in that position for each box to form a 3-by-3-square. This box, when reflected across the minor diagonal, is in the grid. It’s in the position reflected across the minor diagonal from the position you picked (top-middle reflects to middle-right):
Tumblr media Tumblr media
In any row of 3-by-3 boxes, look at the diagonals moving up and to the right, wrapping around the top of the box and either end of the row. The offset is 1 each time.
The box with a 5 as its middle number? That’s a magic square. In fact, any digit 5 is at the centre of a magic square if you wrap the same way as in the previous bullet.
Some questions that are open (at least for me):
Under what circumstances do two digits uniquely determine the whole grid? (My code says there are 87408 = 72×2×607 clue pairs that give unique solutions.)
Under which of those circumstances would @crypticcracking be able to solve it?
CreativeCrocheter – Three Geometries in Crochet
CreativeCrocheter is the pseudonym of a person who blogs about crochet and maths.
As part of a math symposium at my undergraduate alma mater, I set up “learning stations” with my crocheted items that demonstrated various mathematical concepts. You’ve already seen the first station’s challenge if you voted in Match 5.    The second station contained three crocheted objects – yes, the school team colors are purple and gold.
Tumblr media
I invited the attendees (who included a number of local weavers!) to consider the following:
There are 3 objects, that will be referred to as follows:
Object A is the solid purple object
Object B is the purple and gold object
Object C is the purple and white object
These objects share the following characteristics:
All three were crocheted with the same hook and the same diameter yarns
All three started with the same number of stitches in the first round
All three were worked in continuous spirals of stitches
All three have 16 rounds of stitching
Name the type of geometry exemplified by each object
Hypothesize how to determine the curvature of each object
What other items in nature share the characteristics of Object B?
What type of spiral appears on Object C? Alternatively, what search terms would you enter in an an Internet search engine to find the name of the spiral?
Bonus for fiber folk: Why did the purple and white object take on a hexagonal shape?
Once everyone had a chance to look and consider, we discussed their answers and also considered the following:
How might you use objects such as these to engage non-mathematicians in exploring various geometries?
What would you do to demonstrate the parallel axiom in each geometry using these objects? This would be a good student topic for a future talk.
Ready for some answers?
Object A: Euclidean plane – the two colors form an Archimedean spiral, where each spiral arm remains the same width, created by increasing the number of stitches in each round by the same number as we started with.
Object B: hyperbolic plane (also called saddle or Lobachevskian geometry) – its geometry is shared by lettuce leaves, the saddleback on a mountain, and the crotch of your slacks, to name just a few, and is created by increasing in each round by more stitches than we started with.
Object C: ideal sphere (spherical geometry, also called elliptic or Riemannian) – there are fewer increases in each round for the first half, then corresponding numbers of decreases in the second half to close the sphere.
For more, do explore some of the sources and inspirations for this exercise!
Susan Lombardo
Woolly Thoughts
Daina Taimiņa
Margaret Wertheim
Ms Premise-Conclusion (ideal sphere pattern and other geekery)
Bridges
Oh, that bonus question? A crocheted spiral forms a regular polygon when the increases (two stitches placed into the same stitch) align – in this case by always increasing in the second stitch of the increase done in the previous round. The resulting polygon has the same number of sides as the number of increases per round. So starting with 6 stitches, as I did for each of these shapes, gives a hexagon.
As noted in some previous matches, the supposed dichotomy between logical thinkers and creative thinkers simply doesn’t hold up when it comes to exploring math concepts with fiber!
So, which bit of maths made you say “Aha!” the loudest? Vote:
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
The poll closes at 9am BST on Wednesday the 3rd. I think this is the last match of this year’s math-off. Thanks for reading, and thanks for playing!
from The Aperiodical https://ift.tt/3gCO2Jn from Blogger https://ift.tt/2TW58YX
0 notes