#IT WAS WORSE THAN I REMEMBER... “Tulplacy” TULPLACY

[imjustaf444keriguess]

the sources quickly get less reputable here oh my god.

the most trustworthy source on science news, the website... (checks notes) "thoughtsonlifeandlove dot com"

the first one seems to be a case study on DID, not disproving any experiences outside of DID (this would be like interviewing someone with headaches because of a brain tumor and then going "and thats proof this is the ONLY way someone can have a headache" and ignore people who say they have headaches without brain tumors because they're claiming to have a brain tumor.

the second is an informational page on DID, albeit from a decently trustworthy source, but again, this is like showing me a website about symptoms of a brain tumor and showing it lists headaches as one of the signs.

the links from the websites "help guide dot org" and "thoughts on life and love dot com" are not studies on the existence, or lack thereof, of non-traumagenic plural systems. they're informative articles from probably-maybe-not-reputable sources about DID to simplify it to the layman.

these are not good proof to debunk the idea of non-traumagenic plurality. get better sources and studies. actual research.

You are not a system without trauma.

A fractured identity is a trauma response. "Non-traumagenic" is not a thing, "trauma endo" is not a thing. you will only be a system through trauma, it is formed from trauma as a coping mechanism.

Your trauma is enough to cause your identity to fragment itself. That does not make you an endo.