#I don't usually post anything that might induce anon hate but I'm turning off anon just in case
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
idk how to say this but us druck fans as a whole tend to be the most critical / focused on social issues / ‘sjw’ out of all the remakes, which are in some ways quite similar to mailin in that we often ruin the ‘fun’ of a season by constant criticism in the tags (even though the criticism is mostly well thought-out).
mailin herself cannot stop looking at things through a social justice lens and cannot just relax and realise that the people around her will act in flawed ways. she is not willing to take a moment and realise what may lead a person to consume non-recyclable products etc. BUT at the same time the viewers are also not willing to accept that she is flawed and is perhaps using her sjw identity to make up for her insecurities + that despite how annoying she is she does care. you can never really expect a teenager to do that kind of thing perfectly. there are some interesting posts in the tag rn where people talk about how they themselves used to take on the identity of the person who is knowledgeable about social issues to make up for them feeling like they lack a strong character, or are still figuring out their own sense of morality.
this season is not perfect and she is acting embarrassing and is not above criticism but this incessant need for people to separate themselves from her while at the same time being on a sm platform where communities act very similarly to her is a little jarring
#this is not targeted at anyone specific I am including myself in this#I don't usually post anything that might induce anon hate but I'm turning off anon just in case#idk watching the first few episodes without looking in the tag and then looking in the tag nd it was v predictable got me thinking#about how annoyed other skam remakes were at druck fans criticising them when they were just having fun etc. and didn't want to engage#in a critical way#druck#drs8
109 notes
·
View notes
Text
Reminder that not everything I reblog is full endorsement, as it tends to be on this website. Neither is it endorsement of the people in the notes/OP. I can explore ideas as I see fit without y'all losing it over someone else's blog.
Anyone who wants to harrass me about it is just getting blocked.
Edit: even if i DO agree with something "controversial" or whatever, consider that my mind isn't monochrome and that it doesn't mean I automatically stop seeing the other side. Don't like it? Get the fuck off my blog then. (Also you can check my tags for thoughts on specific posts, if you feel unsafe on my blog etc. If there are no tags kindly do not make assumptions)
Edit Again (Feb 10 '23):
1. New followers: if you don't want me following you back or you don't mind a follow while not wanting me reblogging from you, feel free to DM me w your request (this goes for longtime mutuals too). I understand what it's like out there, you don't have to explain anything
That being said, if you're a blank blog...you're getting blocked, sorry
2. If we have a conversation about ANYTHING, it will be private. No I don't take screenshots or whatever.
3. Since this was asked before, my "reminder" tag is one I use for reminders TO MYSELF, and my new "heterosexuality" tag is something I've decided to use for any mention of heterosexuality (it's not supposed to indicate negativity), my doom tags to block truly awful real-life news is "tw negative" and "tw heavy negative" (for mild and sickening, respectively). I also tag other potentially traumatic things (i.e. "tw violence"). Feminists, if you're sick of seeing male terrorism, my tag for that is "male terrorism" (lol).
4. If I suspect you might threaten the women I follow, you will be blocked
(25 Jan, 2024) some stuff:
+ pro-choice always = basic feminism
+ not shaving = despite being a non-action in and of itself, is an important feminist/self-respectful stance
+ no sexual violence is ever acceptable, including in war, no matter which side
+ white people aren't better/more deserving than any other people, ever
+ I'm fine with the gold-star term (that includes rape victims) and therefore against people who attack lesbians that use it
+ Lesbians are naturally repulsed by the idea of sex with males (lesbians = homosexual female humans). It is possible to be coerced under heavy/threat-induced environments (think arranged marriages/religious upbringings) but no lesbian willingly decides to engage in PIV sex - males are a turn-off.
+ fatphobia is stupid, appearance-based insults are usually stupid. I am personally convinced that extreme fatphobia is reframed misogyny (women naturally have more fat distribution than males)
+ hatred of femaleness is a major symptom of living in a male-centric global system and neither is natural (the inability to imagine anything beyond our current point in time does not help)
+ question the propaganda but expect the truths to be difficult to obtain
+ anti-religion: growing up without such a thing shows religion up rather clearly as tools to blind, subdue, control, and weaponize (despite the positive aspects/cultures that may exist too)
+ oh also I don't interact with your pathetic little anon hate messages. As in, you get deleted on sight and I don't even read the whole thing :)
⚡ I should mention I'm not a radfem, as I haven't got the reading + I don't live the lifestyle properly as an intentional choice (however the way I am/live naturally aligns with it in some ways) + I respect the women I follow too much to claim to be one without following through. Still, I am definitely a supporter in any way I can here. If you want to know more about me and you're not a Sus Impostor, feel free to DM me (also be aware I disappear for long amounts of time bec I'm useless at constant communication).
32 notes
·
View notes