#Get gold for contract killer sniper
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Get gold for contract killer sniper
Contract Killer Game Cheats Xbox OneĪssault contracts can be identified by a skull icon at the top center of the contract description. Unlock new locations, contracts and cool items each time you level up.Įarn special time bonuses by completing contracts faster. Tap these areas to move towards an exit and/or get a better line of sight on a specific enemy. In other words, don't get caught up with guns, or Jack may wind up in a world of hurt.Įxamine the environment for places Jack can move to, designated in orange. There's also body armor to consider, which is extremely helpful during the toughest missions. Throwing knives are great for melee kills from up to 10 yards away, flashbang grenades temporarily stun enemies, Reactix pills slow down time and med kits replenish health. In Contract Killer 2, the guns definitely take center stage, but you also need to spend some cash and credits on equipment. Granted, you probably won't be able to afford this stuff half the time, but it's always a great idea to make upgrades whenever possible.ĭon't Forget About Equipment And Body Armor Once the clock hits zero, you fail, so be mindful of how many minutes/seconds remain.Īlways Seek To Upgrade Weapons And Equipmentīefore heading out into the field, Contract Killer 2 will let you know where you stand in terms of firepower, then suggest upgrades. Each mission must be completed within a set amount of time. The sneakier Jack is, the longer you preserve his health, since doing this won't attract unwanted attention. From there, tap this circle when the tiny spinning ball passes over the yellow mark, then watch Jack pulverize or strangle his way to a bonus melee reward, but it goes beyond cash and XP. You'll know Jack is in position if a circle appears over the victim. To do this, you'll need to be within range of an enemy. New to Contract Killer 2 is the ability to perform stealth kills without alerting guards. On that note, it's a good idea to squeeze off a couple shots and then press the cover button (shield on the right) to regroup. Sounds like a no brainer, but even we are surprised at how much we forget this simple tip, largely because we're too busy lining up targets to realize Jack's health has depleted. Well duh, right? The longer Jack remains out in the open, the easier a target he'll be. Only 15 more melee kills to go? Sounds doable. What's especially cool is the ability to see your progress for different objectives. Think of it as a special rewards card, because that's exactly what it is. Complete in-game achievements to score cash, valuable XP that goes towards unlocking new weapons/equipment and the coolest prize of all, free credits, so long as you earn enough stars. Subscribe To Disney Movie Club: 306 CreditsĬongratulations on joining the Frequent Killer Club. Interested in signing up for the Glu Mobile newsletter? Ready to join the ranks of the AARP? You stand to earn a few hundred credits, depending on how far you're willing to go. Also try this Mega Jump Hack, because this is good game too. More Contract Killer Cheats you can find by the link below. After you hack Contract Killer, enjoy the game. You can use our Contract Killer Hack on devices running under Android and iOS (iPad, iPhone). To use this Contract Killer Hack you do NOT need to jailbreak or root your device. Impatient? If so, pull out that credit or debit card and buy more.Ģ020/2021 WAEC GCE Mathematics Answer/Question Expo (Obj, Essay). Contract Killer 2 uses two different currencies, cash and credits, and you'll need a ton of both to afford the most efficient weapons and gear.
Play freemium games long enough, and you'll learn what's up. Make In-App Purchases For More Cash And Credits Instead, reference this Contract Killer 2 cheats and tips guide. That said, don't let hero Jack Griffin go six feet under. It's both rewarding and tricky, an arcade style game where heavily armed baddies are more than capable of taking you out. The recently released title casts you as a sniper charged with killing a plethora of baddies in New York, Dubai and Moscow, where constantly upgrading one's equipment and possessing a steady hand are but two keys to fortune and glory, not to mention ridding the world of evildoers. If you dream of being a gun for hire, Glu Mobile's free iOS and Android effort, Contract Killer 2, will help scratch that itch.
Keep Jack Griffin alive and boost your kill count.
1 note
·
View note
Text
First Meeting
Ateez Mafia!au: You Meet For The First Time
Hongjoong:
In the mafia world, there were the big three. These were the top three Mafia groups with, undeniably, the most power and influence to the surrounding world, whether individuals knew it or not. The groups were EXO, Stray Kids and Ateez and seeing as you belonged to Ateez’s largest rival group SKZ, it wasn’t exactly all hugs and kisses. Though you were a fairly new individual to the SKZ family, you were no stranger to the life of crime, having being taught to shoot a gun from very young and fight by your father who was a Capo for his old mafia group, you had climbed up the ranks of the Stray Kids ladder pretty quickly. Which would have been shocking from the outside perspective of someone such as Hongjoong, however to those nearby, you were seen working the under the table dealings, assigning and assisting in assassinations, aiding in missions much below your pay grade which earned you the position you held. You had first met Hongjoong during a ‘truce’ meeting that had quickly turned sour when they found explosives rigged to the derelict building that they had assumed Chan was cause of. So, in the midst of the gunfight and retreat, Hongjoong had San and Wooyoung take you captive as a means to negotiations and quickly was he intrigued by you. Never had he seen a female seem so unbothered and able to surpass his flawless features, intense looks and honey-like voice. He seemed mesmerised by your unwavering loyalty to Stray Kids alongside despite knowing the danger, you kept running your mouth as if these people weren’t trained killers but longtime friends.
Seonghwa:
Though not a part of any known groups or gangs, you were one of the mafia syndicates best hitman, sorry woman. Though few had seen your face or known your identity and lived, the whispers of the infamous killer spread and reached many ears and you were a sought after hitwoman. And like all jobs, your had many perks but with your recent target being the one and only Park Seonghwa you knew that many of these perks would have been added to sweeten the deal with the matter of fact that you were to eliminate the right hand man of one of the most ruthless crime organisations to walk the earth Despite having passed glimpses of one another at during “charity parties”, as many of these gangs liked to call it, you never had the chance to have been formally introduced until you wound up in the club owned by Kang Yeosang, club owner business man on papers, but of course to the few, he was Ateez’s very own drug mixologist and soldier. So there you were, sat at the VIP section with your right hand ladies, staring up at the owner’s booth watching the moves of Park Seonghwa, Kang Yeosang and ladies man Kim Wooyoung before you were summoned up by a bartender who said the presence of you and your ladies was requested by the males. Stepping through the doors, you immediately met eyes with each of the males, eyes undoubtedly scanning over each ones features before stopping at your target, there he sat furthest away from the other two, pouring himself more scotch as he cockily raised his glass to the three of you as a sign of greeting meanwhile Yeosang and Wooyoung came over, rushing you to sit beside them whilst you slowly meandered over to the male clad in a neatly pressed suit, suit jacket discarded with the sleeves rolled up and perched yourself on his arm rest.
Yunho:
You met Yunho on the day of your 19th birthday. It was the simple cliche, your parents were best friends growing up and wanted their children to date and get married. But being a part of a crime syndicate so big made plans like that not so simple. As both your father and Yunho’s father were leaders of infamous gangs, it was a deal held before the births of the both of you that you would get married. So on the day of your 19th birthday, you were awoken to being showered with many gifts and before you knew it, you were being driven to a large mansion on the other side of Seoul. Upon questioning your parents, they both gave curt responses and lead you into a large dining room where there sat your, yet your unknown to you, husband to be and his parents. Shyly you watched as your parents greeted them with hugs and handshakes, before they sat down opposite them, beckoning you to sit in between them like Yunho was. There, sat in front of the both of you were marriage contracts. Thick, slabs of white paper sat in contrast to the deep black glass of the table, the neatly written words staring back at you as it read ‘Legalised document of the union of the Jung’s and the (Y/L/N)s’. Looking up in horror, you glanced around the table to see all blank faces, as you were the last one to know. Abruptly arising in anger, you practically flew out of the room dismissing the yells of your parents when you were suddenly stopped by a sharp, curt pull on the arm, turning to being face to face with the beautiful individual who was previously sat opposite you.
Yeosang:
As Yeosang was one of the only high ranking members of Ateez who had been placed in the eye of the public as a legitimate business man, he was constantly around his nightclub where new crime deal prospects constantly being whispered about by certain people. You were a new employee, and unlike the others, you knew nothing of Yeosang’s real job, of how deadly the handsome male really was, which was highly unusual that the position offered was even given to you, an outsider to the gang life. For one to be introduced to a high ranking member of Ateez meant that either you were one of them or a rival member, which rose suspicions in Yeosang as he saw you being shown around by the acting manager who had interviewed you because, unlike most, if not all, of the other workers, you didn’t owe Ateez any money nor were you secretly aiding in any of their under the table dealings. So the surprise in which Yeosang felt when he had walked in and discovered that one of his acting managers had employed you, he was curious about whether you were really as oblivious as you seemed. So he called you into his office before your first shift to give you the rundown of the place, as he put it, despite already been shown around. You had known the individual to be handsome due to his many appearances on TV, but seeing him up close, you were hit with shock at the subtle smirk he wore when you walked in and seemingly froze on the spot. Upon summoning you closer, he gave you a not so subtle glance over before straightening out his suit and offering you a drink.
San:
Like Yeosang, San was also one of the members who was given a business to run, whether legitimate or not, the line was blurred. You were a police officer. Despite being young, you rose through the ranks pretty quickly which is what landed you in front of the exotic dancers club for a mission. You were to go undercover and find any information on the largest rival gangs that seemed to frequent the club; Ateez and EXO. Although EXO had the higher advantage of having years more experience than Ateez in the mafia business, the smaller gang had rose to criminal fame very quickly, being in the circle of the top three most dangerous gangs in just over a year. Upon walking into the club, you were hit with the stench of cologne, cheap perfume, smoke and liquor. Your eyes setting upon the stages where two dark skinned and fair skinned girls where currently twirling around. Walking through the building, you turned heads and gained whispers as you were one of the few girls currently fully clothed. As you reached the office, you knocked before entering once a gruff voice summoned you in and there he was sat on the dark brown leather swivel chair, dressed in an all black 2017 Ludlow J. Crew suit and a deep red shirt with a matching tie, Choi San. The man was most certainly not done justice by his photos, seeming more ethereal yet smouldering in person. He wore a smile but this man was nothing without the reputation of his duality; from a simple, kind businessman to a stone-faced killer in seconds.
Mingi:
For Mingi, he prided himself on being a skilful sniper. He was the best in the business. Hired by many for assistance in assassinations that were needed to be taken care of swiftly and from a distance until he decided to stick to being Ateez’s personal long range sniper on missions where they needed eyes outside and at a distance, even with his extensive training in hand-to-hand combat, Mingi had grown to preference his sniper, a Remington 700 XCR. However, for today’s mission, Mingi would have to give up the sniper and use his trusty handgun and fighting skills as they ambushed a rival group who were severely messing with their drug trade business. Sneaking in with Hongjoong, San and Jongho, Mingi had gotten Yeosang to disable all alarms and cameras throughout the mansion so they could all enter undetected. When the first shot was fired, the house began buzzing with noise, orders and gunshots heard from almost every room except one. The main study, although unlocked seemed to have no activity in it until Mingi decided to take a look and in there he found a lone lady, sat in her desk clacking away at her laptop as if there wasn’t a shootout only 3 meters away from her. Looking up, she saw Mingi with his gun raised and she smiled, and there Mingi seemed bewitched as she seemed not to even blink as the male stood inches away from her with gun pointed to her head. A gold plaque with the words ‘Y/N Y/L/N’ caught his eye.
Wooyoung:
Wooyoung was known for being the flirt, the crazy and unpredictable one which worked in his favour when he needed information from certain clients, whether male or female, they all fell for his little charm. That little wink and the way his mouth contoured into an over confident smirk that he held perfectly on his face made him deadly in a way no gun or knife ever could. Walking into the club, you knew your target was a well sought out individual and that you’d have competition on who would be getting information first. Seeing as the male had no issue in being active with both males and females, you knew he’d be surrounded tonight as it was one of the only nights he left the comfort of his chateau and private parties for an event of this scale and much to your distaste, there he was with a grey haired male stood rather close to him, whispering in his ear as females danced around them. Taking a moment to collect yourself, you grabbed a shot from the bartender and downed it before slamming the glass down and pushing yourself off of the bar and strutting over to the two well dressed males. A slight sheen of sweat on your skin made you even more enticing as people seemed to clear a pathway or stop dancing to keep eyes on your swaying figure in red bottom Louboutin wrap heels and one shoulder diamante dress before you stopped in a seat beside the man and turned to give smile at the two of them. Wooyoung’s eyes raked down your body, not bothering to hide the fact that he was doing so before sending a wink over to you and going back to his drink as the male was no longer speaking but much rather gawking at the goddess like female sat next to him. Knowing this would be an easy assignment, you reached out your hand to greet both males.
Jongho:
You weren’t part of the mafia life. Far from it. A regular civilian with a regular job as a waitress living with your parents with regular jobs as a police officer and a doctor. However, your meeting with Jongho was far from regular or even normal. You had gone to bring lunch to your parents, first stopping at the hospital to drop off some food to your mother before rushing out and heading to the precinct to have lunch with your father, a very common occurrence. Upon gallivanting into the police station, you noticed a lot more chaos in the air than usual. Seeing people rushing around on phones, holding papers and large files, some walking in and out of your father’s office and a lot of shouting heard from multiple directions. Walking a little slower to avoid getting knocked to the floor, however, certain plans don’t work well as the minute you stepped out, you had bumped into a very hard chest and upon looking up, you saw a a very handsome beat up face smirking down at you before he was pushed out of your way into an interrogation room nearby. You finally reached your father’s office and walked in to find him on the phone with a very unpleased face, as he glanced up to glare at whoever walked in, his face softened to see you and he motioned you in. As he hung up the phone he gave you a soft smile but before you could sit, someone burst in with a rushed voice about Jongho of Ateez in room one. Realising that lunch was off the table, you walked out with your father and let him walk off in a different direction. However, as you were near enough down the road, your phone rang and the very enraged voice of your father rang through about how the witness would only speak to the ‘innocent looking cutie he bumped into’.
#Ateez#Ateez au#Kim Hongjoong#Park Seonghwa#Jung Yunho#Kang Yeosang#Choi San#Song Mingi#Jung Wooyoung#Choi Jongho#Ateez mafia#Ateez mafia au#Ateez preference#Atreez preferences#Ateez scenario#Ateez Scenarios#Ateez Imagine#Ateez imagines#Ateez mafia!au#Ateez gang au#kpop mafia au#kpop mafia!au#kpop imagine#kpop imagines#kpop scenario#kpop scenarios
466 notes
·
View notes
Text
fahc headcanons - weapon of choice
michael - bare hands. there’s something awfully familiar about the feeling of split knuckles or a restricting throat against his palm. it reminds him of jersey, of a childhood on the rough side, of a fierce determination and want to survive.
gavin - knuckle duster. they’re gold nd flash nd match his necklace perfectly. hit them just right under a streetlight and they’ll reflect the stars back into his glasses; the parts that aren’t covered in blood, that is.
jack - any vehicle he can find. there’s nothing quite like bursting onto the scene nd slamming into ur enemy. a soft ‘gentlemen’ floats through the coms, accompanied by the cracking of bones when the target finally hits the ground.
ryan - silenced pistol. you’d expect something more violent from the assassin, but he likes the simple things. classy, original, the silent killer. he’ll get you from across a balcony, leaning out the window of the flat he broke into, watching the chaos from high in his tower.
geoff - contracted killer. god forbid the king gets his suit dirty. there’s a satisfying smugness to knowing he can have someone else do his bidding. of course, he’ll make sure he’s in sight when it happens; he wants the target to know who did this to them.
jeremy - obscure objects. coins, hammers, meat cleavers. if it can be pulled back and thrown, he wants it in his hand. there’s a glee that rests in his eyes. small but powerful; if he’s lining you up for a shot then you’re already dead.
bonus
ray - sniper rifle. ray, like ryan, likes to take the easier road. he’s safe and comfortable on the roof of a building, rain pounding down hard on the gravel, his hand perfectly steady. it’s the moving in the shadows, walking on tightropes and not even staying to watch it all unfold.
inspired by the hitman series and @writesthrice short piece about the golden boy of the fahc
121 notes
·
View notes
Note
All ending in 5 for Kestrel!
5. What does your OC normally wear? What would your OC wear on a special night?She usually wears the flannel, jeans, and combat boots that are with the road leathers outfit, but replace the jacket with a bomber jacket, which is lined with ballistic weave. On a special night she has a golden dress she got in New Vegas and golden pumps with 2 inch heels (picture Magnolia’s dress but gold and ankle-length).
15. What was your OC’s childhood like?Her childhood in Vault 101 was awful. From birth she’s had to deal with racism (I HC that due to the 50′s aesthetic, the 50′s racism traveled into vault 101 and was preserved there), so she was never treated well by most of the other kids and adults. Her parents did nothing to fight it, which made her angry and resentful. She often got into fights and was constantly in trouble. Her Vault coursework was low even though she showed promise, she just couldn’t care less. Her only respite is working with her father, who was a mechanic. It gave her something to focus on, something helpful to do that was physical, and drained the anger away, at least briefly. Her childhood ended the moment she left Vault 101 at age 17.
25. If your OC has a soulmate, who is it?She doesn’t have a soulmate, at least not one that comes to mind. She and Danse work really well together, as they balance each other out, but she has a certain history and chemistry with Arthur Maxson. Her relationship with Gage in her NW verse is just fun as he encourages her chaotic and violent nature, letting her raze everything in her path but pulling her back when she goes too far.
35. How is your OC working towards his/her dream job and/or achieved his/her current profession?She doesn’t have a dream job. She’s a mercenary and a Brotherhood Knight, again. She got her merc position by being a good shot with a sniper rifle, improving over the years, and now she’s built up a reputation of taking the unsavory contracts, or assassinations under a different name. Her position as Knight is due to her previously having been in the BOS in the Capitol, leaving after Maxson became Elder, then joining up again in the Commonwealth.
45. What are some things that annoy your OC?Self-righteousness, generally good people (aka Preston), people who smile too much, being unable to get comfortable while holding a sniping position and being unable to move for fear of being seen
55. What are your OC’s thoughts on death?She doesn’t give a fuck if she dies. If she’s killed, you bet your ass she’s taking her killer down with her. As long as she dies with a gun in her hands in the middle of battle she’ll die happy.
65. What is your OC’s favorite drink?Dirty Wastelanders
75. What is your OC’s favorite scent?Hubflowers, fever blossoms, and power armor grease
7 notes
·
View notes
Note
delilah got some questions for ass-hat-o ~ ♔ :First kill ; ♘ :How you prefer to kill someone ; ♙ :Most malicious act tied to your name ; ♜ :Post-kill actions, thoughts, or emotions ; ♞ :Define a good kill
Well, Kitten, here's all you need to know:
♔ :First kill - At the tender age of 16, an act of vengeance and retribution, and it's what got him into the killing game.
Danny's older sister Stella was raped on a night out by some asshole in a bar, and when he found out Danny broke into the establishment and relieved them of their CCTV tapes. He tracked the guy down, got into a fight where punches were thrown and blood was spilled by both parties, but eventually Danny got the upper hand and managed to choke the guy out until he was unconscious. Danny threw him in the trunk of his sister's car and drove until he had become deaf to the man's screams from behind him and he couldn't see city lights anymore.
He pulled him out and tied him to a chair in an abandoned building he'd come across, the only weapon in his possession being a knife he'd taken from his parents' kitchen on his way out. Danny made him admit what he'd done to Stella before torturing the guy for hours simply because he wanted to hear him beg. His final act was to slice the man's throat and leaving him to bleed out, unaware he had been watched the whole time.
He was young and inexperienced and were it not for the member of the New Jersey mob who had witnessed the whole thing and followed him, cleaning up the mess and disposing of the body and the trail of evidence Danny had left, he would most certainly have been caught and tried for murder. But luck was on his side and about a week later Danny was surprised to see his murder weapon (which he'd left beside his victim's dying body) had magically reappeared in the knife block in the Williams' kitchen and a man was waiting in his living room with a 'job opportunity' on offer.
Soon after that Danny was recruited by the mob and hired as muscle, becoming a contract killer and knife for hire after refining his skills, able to begin taking on his choice of client and victim. While in the mob he showed a talent and preference for the blade in honour of his first kill, and he earned the nickname Ascarto - 'blade' in Italian - which never left him.
♘ :How you prefer to kill someone - always knives.
Whereas Danny respects those who use guns and their abilities he generally sees it as a little heavy-handed. He prefers knives as they are up close and personal, often requiring more skill and more precision, more finesse. They're perfect for interrogation, being both threatening and able to cause a lot of pain and suffering, and Danny knows just where to slice and dice to get the full spectrum of agony to encourage a target to answer his questions without the annoyance of premature expiration - it's kind of difficult to extract information from a corpse. So knives are always the way to go, in his opinion.
That said, Danny is extremely impressed by those who show precision with guns and other weapons, such as marksmen like Palladino who is a crack shot with the sniper rifle and a very effective torturer. Any moron can blow a hole in a target and kill them, but Palladino knows exactly how many holes she can put in a person - and where - before they're no longer able to give information. That girl can use a bullet to flick a flea off a man's shoulder from 200 yards. That's impressive.
♙ :Most malicious act tied to your name - The death of Don Roberto.
Yeah, it sounds like a 1980s crime novel, but it's how the New Jersey cops refer to it when they talk about the most prolific unsolved cases.
Don Roberto was the man who replaced Don Gino, the mob boss who took Danny under his wing and gave him his first job. Don Gino was like a second father to Danny, and not long after Ascarto had made a name for himself and left to go solo, Don Gino was ousted by someone who was meant to be his right hand man. (It's worth noting that there is no retirement home for old Dons, they're not laying on a beach somewhere sipping margaritas surrounded by bikini-clad babes... When a Don is replaced, it's dead man's shoes. It's straight up murder.)
Don Roberto betrayed his boss in a cowardly act, poisoning the old man's scotch and not even giving Gino the respect of being present for his death. Danny hates cowards, even more so when they kill the man who practically raised him after 16. Don Roberto had to go, a warning needed to be sent, and Danny wasn't about to be subtle about it.
He offered himself up to the new Don as a hitman, gained a closed-door meeting with the man himself, and two hours later when someone thought to check on their boss they found his three bodyguards dead and Roberto nowhere to be seen. A week later pieces of him began to show up in the mail to various high level members of the mob and certain benefactors as a warning - cowardice and betrayal don't belong in organised crime. Roberto's head was last to turn up, and that was on the Newark Police Captain's desk in a box with a note pinned to his forehead by a small silver knife. It simply stated "You're welcome. Ascarto."
Roberto's gold rings were never found, but they currently sit in a lockbox in a secure bank along with a few other trophies, account under the pseudonym of Oscar Tow.
♜ :Post-kill actions, thoughts, or emotions - Killing is always a rush for Danny, whether it's personal or otherwise, but it's also strangely calming for the seemingly ravenous darkness lurking in his soul. The more violent the death, the more sated he feels.
Danny always feels proud of a good job - he likes to do it well and be told as much - and in a way the act of extermination feels like it's filling a hole inside of him. Unfortunately that pit seems to be bottomless and it's not long before the need to kill again becomes strong, but Danny has learned to dampen those flames until they're required through various means. It's difficult to contain that hunger, though, and too long between kills may mean the next victim often meets a very... messy end.
Danny rarely drinks as he much prefers to be in full control and can't guarantee what his inner beast might get up to if unleashed by inebriation, so any post-kill actions aside from the usual body dump and evidence removal usually involve carefully cleaning his knives before finding someone to share a very intense and animalistic celebration with.
♞ :Define a good kill - Danny is a pretty pragmatic guy, so a good kill for him is one where he was able to get any and all information required, take out the target quickly and efficiently, and leave no trace of his true identity behind aside from the telltale signs of Ascarto. The best kind of kill, though? One he can take personally.
It's all well and good getting cashy money to take out some corporate asshole on behalf of another corporate asshole so they can take over a business, or being hired by the mob again to extract information from a snitch before wasting him and removing any identifying features, but when Danny is taking down someone he feels truly deserves it? It's a great feeling.
Despite being technically a criminal Danny has a refined sense of justice, right and wrong, so the jobs that give him extra pleasure are the ones where he is removing unwanted scum from existence. Anyone who has raped a person, hurt or killed a child, or preyed on the vulnerable members of society for their own gain, Danny would almost do for free... Almost. He's not that stupid.
But man, does he get an extra thrill from knowing someone who deserved it has breathed their last on the end of his blade.
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Download Latest Contract Killer Sniper Mod APK for Android
If you are crazy about full-action games with lots of excellent ammunition, Contact Killer Sniper version 6.1.1 with 14MB file size will make you even crazier. You get to do many fascinating things with lethal weapons in your hand to perform your duty efficiently as you are hired for a purpose. Moreover, the fantastic 3D graphics keep you into the game as no other game can. The game's objective is somewhat like the old PC game Virtua Cop where your job is to stop robbing and other crimes being a police officer. But Killer Sniper is a game of the new days, and it gives you a high-quality experience of locations, characters, and weapons. Your comrades have got your back in case you are stuck in danger. Download the game and grab the best weapons to hit a nice shot.
Contract Killer Sniper Mod APK Information Table
Name Contract Killer SnipperDevelopers GluGenre Action Size 14MBVersion 6.1.1Android Requirement 3 or upDownloads 10000000+Last Updated July 24, 2022
How to Download
You can get the game by following the simple instructions given below for different devices. Firstly, if you want the game for your Android phone, you may follow the following steps. - After turning on the Unknown Sources in your device setting, get back on this page. - Look for the download button on this page and tap on that. - Save the file in your phone memory or your SD card. - Install, and there you go! You can get it for Windows as well with the simple method below. - Search for the APK file of the game on the internet. - You will get the top sites to download from. - Click on one of the sites and hit the download button. - Save the file to your desired location and install it. - Enjoy yourself. It is available on Google Play as well. - First, type the game name in the search bar and press enter. - The app will take you to the install button. - Tap on the button to start downloading. - The end!
How to Play Contract Sniper
The gameplay is quite interesting, making you feel like you are in the future with the high technology and advances machines and weapons at your disposal. You can choose your weapons from a wide variety in front of you. You can enhance a few things about your gun like the damage it causes, reloading time it takes, fire rate, and crit chance. As some author hires you for shooting, you would be paid some handsome sum of money. You have cash, gold, and diamond, which you can achieve by performing different tasks. Later you can use this reward to improve the quality of your ammunition. Also download WWE Mayhem and League of Stickman. You are hired for different missions as a sniper in other parts of the world. You have to be careful not to be seen by the enemy and get them down; in this way, you can reach your goal. You can use first aid during the mission in case you get hurt.
Features
- Enjoy the fascinating 3D graphics with realistic sound effects. - Experience the missions in the future with advanced technology and weapons. - Earn rewards in the form of cash, gold, and diamond. - Use the reward in the best way to make your tools even better. - Takedown your enemies by aiming at them with your sniper rifle. - Use first aid during the mission if needed. - Easy to master controls so you may enjoy the game more. - An engaging storyline never lets you get bored. - Get this fantastic game for free and enjoy it fully. - The exciting locations for the mission keep you hooked.
Frequently Asked Questions
How to get a reward? You can get a reward by completing the mission and earn according to your performance. Can you change your weapons? Yes, you can indeed change the weapons you have to fight better. Is the game free of cost? Yes, it is free of cost, and there are no in-app purchases. Read the full article
0 notes
Text
Now You See Gemma Chan
Moving between blockbusters and indie hits, Gemma Chan has kept one foot in stardom and one in anonymity. But this year, she's going famous full time.
BY ,ALICE WIGNALL 06/01/2021
When is a celebrity not a celebrity? When you’re Gemma Chan, of course – or so says Gemma Chan. ‘I don’t think of myself like that at all,’ she says. ‘My life is fairly low-key.’ What, because you don’t drive a gold Cadillac? She laughs. ‘I don’t live in a mansion, I don’t have an assistant,’ she says. ‘All that kind of stuff.’ Beauty Truths With Gemma Chan by Elle UK Previous VideoPlayNext VideoUnmute Current Time 0:39 / Duration 6:34 Loaded: 25.84% Fullscreen CLICK TO UNMUTE I remain unconvinced, and mount my counterargument, ticking off the evidence on my fingers: one, a starring role in an enormous movie franchise (Sersi in Eternals, part of the world-conquering juggernaut that is the Marvel Cinematic Universe, due for release in late 2020 but Covid-delayed until late 2021); two, a new contract with L’Oréal Paris as an international spokesperson; and, three, another recently announced UK ambassador role with Unicef. Guaranteed blockbuster, cosmetics contract, high-profile charity patron: this is the star-making Big Three; the trifecta of global fame. Come on, I say. This year, your face is going to be everywhere. ‘Er, yeah,’ she says, looking genuinely quite alarmed. MARCIN KEMPSKI Chan's path to this point has been one of steady progress, rather than precipitous acceleration, which is maybe why she finds it hard to contemplate the quantum leap her career is about to take. At 38, and with more than a decade and a half of experience behind her, she’s done it all: BBC bit parts (including Doctor Who and Sherlock) and a breakout TV role in Channel 4’s Humans; high-brow theatre and big-budget films (in Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them and, indeed, a previous Marvel movie, as the sniper Minn-Erva in Captain Marvel. The two characters are unrelated but, as she points out, ‘I was painted blue for that whole job, so it’s not like I’m very recognisable’), but nothing on a scale likely to upend her life. The closest she’s come to that so far is her performance as Astrid in 2018’s surprise smash hit Crazy Rich Asians, which made $238.5m against a budget of $30m and became the top-earning romantic comedy of the Noughties. ‘[Because] Crazy Rich Asians did so well internationally, I definitely felt a shift at that time,’ Chan says. ‘Like, on the Captain Marvel press tour, not being able to walk through [Singapore] airport. Then again, things have settled and the slight craziness of that time has gone away. I do feel like I can – touch wood – go about my life normally now.’ MARCIN KEMPSKI The biggest impact, she says, was professional: ‘Before Crazy Rich Asians, I wasn’t being considered for lead roles in feature films. There [is] a very select group of actors in that pool and I wouldn’t even get an audition, I wasn’t in that conversation. Whereas now... I’m being talked about for certain things and then you may meet the director, or you at least get to have your shot. So that feels a bit different.’ Her most recent project is certainly the kind of job you can imagine being fought over in casting rooms around the world: hey, how would you like to get on a luxury cruise liner with acclaimed director Steven Soderbergh and a killer cast including, oh, I don’t know, Meryl Streep and make an intelligent comedy drama about betrayal, responsibility and enduring love? Who wouldn’t? But Chan was the one who was picked for Let Them All Talk, which was filmed on board the Queen Mary 2 as it crossed the Atlantic from New York to Southampton. It tells the story of a lionised novelist, played by Streep on magisterial form, en route to collect a prestigious writing award in England, accompanied by two old friends and her nephew. Chan is her recently promoted literary agent, who has also bought a ticket for the crossing, in the hope that she can clandestinely find out what her secretive client’s much-anticipated next book is about. I wasn’t being considered for lead roles in feature films ‘Obviously I jumped at the chance,’ says Chan. ‘It was a dream project.’ Though not a stress-free one: ‘A lot of the dialogue was improvised,’ says Chan. ‘There’s a scene, a lunch in New York with Meryl, which was actually the first scene that I shot. So I arrived on set and the restaurant was full of 200 extras; you could hear a pin drop. I went in and sat down, then Meryl came in and sat down, and we just had to improvise a scene. I don’t think I’ve ever had such a clenched bum! I was petrified. There I am, with possibly the greatest actress of all time, and... “Action!”’ There is an alternate timeline, of course, in which Chan genuinely isn’t famous. If she’d followed the path that her early years suggested, her current life would be, if not stress-free, less likely to include head-to-heads with multi-time Oscar winners. MARCIN KEMPSKI Raised in Kent to Chinese parents, she attended an academically selective school before studying law at Oxford. She also played violin to a high standard and swam competitively at a national level. All in all, the perfect image of a relentless high-achiever, bound for success in a stable career – until she took a post-graduation gap year swerve into acting, at first with evening classes, then a full-time course. Even now – when the gamble has decisively paid off – she sounds tentative when discussing her original ambitions to act. She did some am-dram at school, ‘but never thought, I could do this for a job.’ Embarking on her acting studies, the idea of a career was there, but ‘at the back of my mind’. That might be because this period of Chan’s life was fraught: her parents were alarmed that she declined a training contract with a prestigious London law firm, and thought she was making a mistake. Perhaps she still finds it hard to unequivocally state that the path she chose is not one they initially approved of. ‘The key for both of them and therefore for myself, and my sister, was the importance of education,’ she says. ‘It allowed my father to have a completely different life to his father, mother and some of his brothers and sisters. Both of my parents are immigrants who came from very humble backgrounds,’ she adds. ‘They definitely instilled in me a work ethic from a young age and a sense of, “The world doesn’t owe you a living, you have to make your own way.” At one point in my dad’s childhood, he was homeless. My amah, his mum, raised six kids on her own. They had absolutely nothing, they lived in a shack on a hillside in Hong Kong. I’m one generation away from that.’ You can sense the shadow of the lawyer she could have been when she talks, and almost hear the weighing up of pros and cons she has done to determine what steps to take. Of L’Oréal Paris, she says: ‘I have been a little bit cautious when it comes to brand partnerships and things like that. I wanted to wait till it felt like it was right. [I chose] L’Oréal because the brand stands for uplifting women and empowerment and they have a strong philanthropic side to what they do, such as their partnership with The Prince’s Trust.’ MARCIN KEMPSKI She talks about carefully considering joining the Marvel universe, knowing it could mean giving over a share of the next 10 years of her life (‘You’re not signing up for one film, because they have additional films and spin-offs and they cover themselves’). She chooses her words with utmost caution when talking about Eternals: ‘Marvel is pretty strict about these kinds of things and I’ve got an non-disclosure agreement like that,’ she says, miming a massive wodge of a legal document. She insists that alongside this diligence there’s a flip side to her personality: ‘I have a slightly rebellious nature. I wasn’t always the best behaved and, yeah, I do work hard but I’m also quite chaotic. Hopefully I’ve found a bit of balance but when I was younger I was like, “I’ll leave it as late as I can, then I’ll pull an all-nighter.” That’s kind of the person I was.’ It’s impossible to tell if this ‘rebellious’ streak would register on most people’s radars, or if it was only noticeable in the context of her own – or her family’s – high standards. I suspect you’d have to know her very well to find out, and she’s far too protective of her private life to make peeking through the veil a possibility. Despite – or perhaps because of – two long-term relationships with high-profile men (she dated comedian Jack Whitehall from 2011 to 2017, and has been in a relationship with actor Dominic Cooper since 2018), she doesn’t discuss her personal life. It’s not exactly a state secret – she makes mention of ‘my partner’ when talking about what she did in the first lockdown (volunteering pretty much full-time for her friend Lulu Dillon’s charity, Cook 19, delivering meals to London hospitals) and Cooper makes the odd appearance on her Instagram account – but she’s certainly not going to give rolling updates on her romantic life. Anything I share could become a story on a slow news day ‘Over 10 years, you learn the importance of privacy, what you choose to share and what you don’t. When you start out, you don’t even know what is important to keep for yourself – I didn’t anyway – whereas now I think there are certain things that I absolutely know, “That’s mine and it’s private.” For me, my comfort level is to have a clear distinction between what is for me and what I’m happy to talk about.’ I ask if she’s had any bad experiences with the press. ‘Nothing too horrendous, but some experiences of not having my wits about me. I’m aware now that anything I say could become a clickbait headline – well, on a slow news day.’ MARCIN KEMPSKI (As if to prove her point, in the week that we talk, Jack Whitehall makes headlines in multiple news outlets in the UK – and, indeed, around the world – for making an off-hand comment in an episode of his Netflix show that he ‘could have got married’ to Chan, but he ‘f*cked up my chance of that’. And, given that this was midway through a global pandemic, it wasn’t even a particularly slow news day.) What she's happy to share on her social media – in fact, what makes up the bulk of her feeds – are her thoughts on a range of social and political subjects, from domestic abuse campaigns, to equal access to education, to Black Lives Matter, to protesting against anti-Asian racism. Which doesn’t always go down well: ‘Every time you say anything political, if it’s in the most uncontroversial way, you’ll be criticised for it; you need to be prepared for that. Every time I post something [like that], I lose followers, so it’s probably not the best business sense...’. But she’s not going to stop: ‘I want to highlight things that are important to me but without preaching. I’m still working it out, how to be an advocate in the most effective way.’ MARCIN KEMPSKI I ask if she feels hopeful about the future, given the myriad challenges she mentions. She pauses. ‘I’ve definitely struggled and felt hopeless,’ she says. ‘I think most of us have realised how powerless we are in terms of the day-to- day governing of our [country]. There no longer seems to be any accountability; there’s a lack of shame. Things that a minister or an advisor would have resigned for 10 years ago, now there are no repercussions. That’s incredibly frustrating, especially when people’s lives are at stake. But, I do have hope – mainly because of the next generation. They’re more politically aware than I was, more involved. Often in the media the most boorish voices seem to monopolise headlines, but actually there are decent people who want to make things better for their fellow humans. There are more of them than youmight think. During the pandemic, obviously it was a terrible time, but there were things that sprung up on a local community level of people trying to help each other. That was encouraging.’ Every time you say anything political, you’ll be criticised for it And, of course, last year Black Lives Matter protests pushed questions about race and identity to the forefront as never before. How does Chan feel about her own role in increasing representation as a British Asian? ‘I get moments where I think, I wish we didn’t have to talk about race anymore. In the same way I wish we didn’t have to talk about why it’s unusual to have a female lead. Why is it still the exception? Why is it still so unusual to have half of the human race being centred in these stories? It seems ridiculous to still be flagging that as a talking point.’ She talks about a structure that actor Riz Ahmed has described: on tier one, a minority actor will play stereotypical, reductive roles. On tier two, your race is still prominent, but the character is nuanced and well-rounded. ‘And the holy grail is tier three, where you’re just viewed as a human. But, while we’re still working towards that goal of much more equal representation, it’s going to be something that we have to be more consciously aware of, and it is going to be part of the conversation.’ It’s a classic Gemma Chan answer. I can feel the burn of her frustration, and I see how she’s thought through her best approach. She’s got a goal, and she knows how to get there. MARCIN KEMPSKI As for her own goals – well, there’s a packed schedule ahead: when we talk, she’s about to join Florence Pugh and Chris Pine for director Olivia Wilde’s follow-up to Booksmart, Don’t Worry Darling. Then, when the pandemic allows, there are the delayed back-to-back shoots for Crazy Rich Asians 2 and 3, not to mention the release of Eternals. She’s also set up a production company, which is working on a range of projects focusing on ‘women whose stories haven’t been given their due, who are these unsung heroes of history’. She loves producing (‘You get a bit more control’), so much so that one day it might be all she does. ‘There may be a point where I want to take a step back from the acting side and, if the producing is established by then, that would be great.’ Hmm, I think. The thing about being globally famous is that once you are, it’s kind of hard to stop. But if anyone can manage blockbusters one month, normal life the next, it’s someone with a big brain, a ton of experience and her eye on the prize. Someone a bit like Gemma Chan. So, when is a celebrity not a celebrity? We might be about to find out. Gemma is an international spokesperson for L’Oréal Paris and the face of Revitalift Filler Day Cream. ELLE's February 2021 issue hits newsstands on January 7 2021.
Luxury Designer Clothing, Handbags . Like this article? Sign up to our newsletter to get more articles like this delivered straight to your inbox. In need of more inspiration, thoughtful journalism and at-home beauty tips? Subscribe to ELLE's print magazine today! SUBSCRIBE HERE
from https://www.online-digitalstore.com/post/now-you-see-gemma-chan
from Online Digital Store - Blog https://onlinedigitalstore2.weebly.com/blog/now-you-see-gemma-chan
0 notes
Text
Now You See Gemma Chan
Moving between blockbusters and indie hits, Gemma Chan has kept one foot in stardom and one in anonymity. But this year, she's going famous full time.
BY ,ALICE WIGNALL 06/01/2021
When is a celebrity not a celebrity? When you’re Gemma Chan, of course – or so says Gemma Chan. ‘I don’t think of myself like that at all,’ she says. ‘My life is fairly low-key.’ What, because you don’t drive a gold Cadillac? She laughs. ‘I don’t live in a mansion, I don’t have an assistant,’ she says. ‘All that kind of stuff.’ Beauty Truths With Gemma Chan by Elle UK Previous VideoPlayNext VideoUnmute Current Time 0:39 / Duration 6:34 Loaded: 25.84% Fullscreen CLICK TO UNMUTE I remain unconvinced, and mount my counterargument, ticking off the evidence on my fingers: one, a starring role in an enormous movie franchise (Sersi in Eternals, part of the world-conquering juggernaut that is the Marvel Cinematic Universe, due for release in late 2020 but Covid-delayed until late 2021); two, a new contract with L’Oréal Paris as an international spokesperson; and, three, another recently announced UK ambassador role with Unicef. Guaranteed blockbuster, cosmetics contract, high-profile charity patron: this is the star-making Big Three; the trifecta of global fame. Come on, I say. This year, your face is going to be everywhere. ‘Er, yeah,’ she says, looking genuinely quite alarmed. MARCIN KEMPSKI Chan's path to this point has been one of steady progress, rather than precipitous acceleration, which is maybe why she finds it hard to contemplate the quantum leap her career is about to take. At 38, and with more than a decade and a half of experience behind her, she’s done it all: BBC bit parts (including Doctor Who and Sherlock) and a breakout TV role in Channel 4’s Humans; high-brow theatre and big-budget films (in Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them and, indeed, a previous Marvel movie, as the sniper Minn-Erva in Captain Marvel. The two characters are unrelated but, as she points out, ‘I was painted blue for that whole job, so it’s not like I’m very recognisable’), but nothing on a scale likely to upend her life. The closest she’s come to that so far is her performance as Astrid in 2018’s surprise smash hit Crazy Rich Asians, which made $238.5m against a budget of $30m and became the top-earning romantic comedy of the Noughties. ‘[Because] Crazy Rich Asians did so well internationally, I definitely felt a shift at that time,’ Chan says. ‘Like, on the Captain Marvel press tour, not being able to walk through [Singapore] airport. Then again, things have settled and the slight craziness of that time has gone away. I do feel like I can – touch wood – go about my life normally now.’ MARCIN KEMPSKI The biggest impact, she says, was professional: ‘Before Crazy Rich Asians, I wasn’t being considered for lead roles in feature films. There [is] a very select group of actors in that pool and I wouldn’t even get an audition, I wasn’t in that conversation. Whereas now... I’m being talked about for certain things and then you may meet the director, or you at least get to have your shot. So that feels a bit different.’ Her most recent project is certainly the kind of job you can imagine being fought over in casting rooms around the world: hey, how would you like to get on a luxury cruise liner with acclaimed director Steven Soderbergh and a killer cast including, oh, I don’t know, Meryl Streep and make an intelligent comedy drama about betrayal, responsibility and enduring love? Who wouldn’t? But Chan was the one who was picked for Let Them All Talk, which was filmed on board the Queen Mary 2 as it crossed the Atlantic from New York to Southampton. It tells the story of a lionised novelist, played by Streep on magisterial form, en route to collect a prestigious writing award in England, accompanied by two old friends and her nephew. Chan is her recently promoted literary agent, who has also bought a ticket for the crossing, in the hope that she can clandestinely find out what her secretive client’s much-anticipated next book is about. I wasn’t being considered for lead roles in feature films ‘Obviously I jumped at the chance,’ says Chan. ‘It was a dream project.’ Though not a stress-free one: ‘A lot of the dialogue was improvised,’ says Chan. ‘There’s a scene, a lunch in New York with Meryl, which was actually the first scene that I shot. So I arrived on set and the restaurant was full of 200 extras; you could hear a pin drop. I went in and sat down, then Meryl came in and sat down, and we just had to improvise a scene. I don’t think I’ve ever had such a clenched bum! I was petrified. There I am, with possibly the greatest actress of all time, and... “Action!”’ There is an alternate timeline, of course, in which Chan genuinely isn’t famous. If she’d followed the path that her early years suggested, her current life would be, if not stress-free, less likely to include head-to-heads with multi-time Oscar winners. MARCIN KEMPSKI Raised in Kent to Chinese parents, she attended an academically selective school before studying law at Oxford. She also played violin to a high standard and swam competitively at a national level. All in all, the perfect image of a relentless high-achiever, bound for success in a stable career – until she took a post-graduation gap year swerve into acting, at first with evening classes, then a full-time course. Even now – when the gamble has decisively paid off – she sounds tentative when discussing her original ambitions to act. She did some am-dram at school, ‘but never thought, I could do this for a job.’ Embarking on her acting studies, the idea of a career was there, but ‘at the back of my mind’. That might be because this period of Chan’s life was fraught: her parents were alarmed that she declined a training contract with a prestigious London law firm, and thought she was making a mistake. Perhaps she still finds it hard to unequivocally state that the path she chose is not one they initially approved of. ‘The key for both of them and therefore for myself, and my sister, was the importance of education,’ she says. ‘It allowed my father to have a completely different life to his father, mother and some of his brothers and sisters. Both of my parents are immigrants who came from very humble backgrounds,’ she adds. ‘They definitely instilled in me a work ethic from a young age and a sense of, “The world doesn’t owe you a living, you have to make your own way.” At one point in my dad’s childhood, he was homeless. My amah, his mum, raised six kids on her own. They had absolutely nothing, they lived in a shack on a hillside in Hong Kong. I’m one generation away from that.’ You can sense the shadow of the lawyer she could have been when she talks, and almost hear the weighing up of pros and cons she has done to determine what steps to take. Of L’Oréal Paris, she says: ‘I have been a little bit cautious when it comes to brand partnerships and things like that. I wanted to wait till it felt like it was right. [I chose] L’Oréal because the brand stands for uplifting women and empowerment and they have a strong philanthropic side to what they do, such as their partnership with The Prince’s Trust.’ MARCIN KEMPSKI She talks about carefully considering joining the Marvel universe, knowing it could mean giving over a share of the next 10 years of her life (‘You’re not signing up for one film, because they have additional films and spin-offs and they cover themselves’). She chooses her words with utmost caution when talking about Eternals: ‘Marvel is pretty strict about these kinds of things and I’ve got an non-disclosure agreement like that,’ she says, miming a massive wodge of a legal document. She insists that alongside this diligence there’s a flip side to her personality: ‘I have a slightly rebellious nature. I wasn’t always the best behaved and, yeah, I do work hard but I’m also quite chaotic. Hopefully I’ve found a bit of balance but when I was younger I was like, “I’ll leave it as late as I can, then I’ll pull an all-nighter.” That’s kind of the person I was.’ It’s impossible to tell if this ‘rebellious’ streak would register on most people’s radars, or if it was only noticeable in the context of her own – or her family’s – high standards. I suspect you’d have to know her very well to find out, and she’s far too protective of her private life to make peeking through the veil a possibility. Despite – or perhaps because of – two long-term relationships with high-profile men (she dated comedian Jack Whitehall from 2011 to 2017, and has been in a relationship with actor Dominic Cooper since 2018), she doesn’t discuss her personal life. It’s not exactly a state secret – she makes mention of ‘my partner’ when talking about what she did in the first lockdown (volunteering pretty much full-time for her friend Lulu Dillon’s charity, Cook 19, delivering meals to London hospitals) and Cooper makes the odd appearance on her Instagram account – but she’s certainly not going to give rolling updates on her romantic life. Anything I share could become a story on a slow news day ‘Over 10 years, you learn the importance of privacy, what you choose to share and what you don’t. When you start out, you don’t even know what is important to keep for yourself – I didn’t anyway – whereas now I think there are certain things that I absolutely know, “That’s mine and it’s private.” For me, my comfort level is to have a clear distinction between what is for me and what I’m happy to talk about.’ I ask if she’s had any bad experiences with the press. ‘Nothing too horrendous, but some experiences of not having my wits about me. I’m aware now that anything I say could become a clickbait headline – well, on a slow news day.’ MARCIN KEMPSKI (As if to prove her point, in the week that we talk, Jack Whitehall makes headlines in multiple news outlets in the UK – and, indeed, around the world – for making an off-hand comment in an episode of his Netflix show that he ‘could have got married’ to Chan, but he ‘f*cked up my chance of that’. And, given that this was midway through a global pandemic, it wasn’t even a particularly slow news day.) What she's happy to share on her social media – in fact, what makes up the bulk of her feeds – are her thoughts on a range of social and political subjects, from domestic abuse campaigns, to equal access to education, to Black Lives Matter, to protesting against anti-Asian racism. Which doesn’t always go down well: ‘Every time you say anything political, if it’s in the most uncontroversial way, you’ll be criticised for it; you need to be prepared for that. Every time I post something [like that], I lose followers, so it’s probably not the best business sense...’. But she’s not going to stop: ‘I want to highlight things that are important to me but without preaching. I’m still working it out, how to be an advocate in the most effective way.’ MARCIN KEMPSKI I ask if she feels hopeful about the future, given the myriad challenges she mentions. She pauses. ‘I’ve definitely struggled and felt hopeless,’ she says. ‘I think most of us have realised how powerless we are in terms of the day-to- day governing of our [country]. There no longer seems to be any accountability; there’s a lack of shame. Things that a minister or an advisor would have resigned for 10 years ago, now there are no repercussions. That’s incredibly frustrating, especially when people’s lives are at stake. But, I do have hope – mainly because of the next generation. They’re more politically aware than I was, more involved. Often in the media the most boorish voices seem to monopolise headlines, but actually there are decent people who want to make things better for their fellow humans. There are more of them than youmight think. During the pandemic, obviously it was a terrible time, but there were things that sprung up on a local community level of people trying to help each other. That was encouraging.’ Every time you say anything political, you’ll be criticised for it And, of course, last year Black Lives Matter protests pushed questions about race and identity to the forefront as never before. How does Chan feel about her own role in increasing representation as a British Asian? ‘I get moments where I think, I wish we didn’t have to talk about race anymore. In the same way I wish we didn’t have to talk about why it’s unusual to have a female lead. Why is it still the exception? Why is it still so unusual to have half of the human race being centred in these stories? It seems ridiculous to still be flagging that as a talking point.’ She talks about a structure that actor Riz Ahmed has described: on tier one, a minority actor will play stereotypical, reductive roles. On tier two, your race is still prominent, but the character is nuanced and well-rounded. ‘And the holy grail is tier three, where you’re just viewed as a human. But, while we’re still working towards that goal of much more equal representation, it’s going to be something that we have to be more consciously aware of, and it is going to be part of the conversation.’ It’s a classic Gemma Chan answer. I can feel the burn of her frustration, and I see how she’s thought through her best approach. She’s got a goal, and she knows how to get there. MARCIN KEMPSKI As for her own goals – well, there’s a packed schedule ahead: when we talk, she’s about to join Florence Pugh and Chris Pine for director Olivia Wilde’s follow-up to Booksmart, Don’t Worry Darling. Then, when the pandemic allows, there are the delayed back-to-back shoots for Crazy Rich Asians 2 and 3, not to mention the release of Eternals. She’s also set up a production company, which is working on a range of projects focusing on ‘women whose stories haven’t been given their due, who are these unsung heroes of history’. She loves producing (‘You get a bit more control’), so much so that one day it might be all she does. ‘There may be a point where I want to take a step back from the acting side and, if the producing is established by then, that would be great.’ Hmm, I think. The thing about being globally famous is that once you are, it’s kind of hard to stop. But if anyone can manage blockbusters one month, normal life the next, it’s someone with a big brain, a ton of experience and her eye on the prize. Someone a bit like Gemma Chan. So, when is a celebrity not a celebrity? We might be about to find out. Gemma is an international spokesperson for L’Oréal Paris and the face of Revitalift Filler Day Cream. ELLE's February 2021 issue hits newsstands on January 7 2021.
Luxury Designer Clothing, Handbags . Like this article? Sign up to our newsletter to get more articles like this delivered straight to your inbox. In need of more inspiration, thoughtful journalism and at-home beauty tips? Subscribe to ELLE's print magazine today! SUBSCRIBE HERE
source https://www.online-digitalstore.com/post/now-you-see-gemma-chan from Online Digital Store https://onlinedigitalstore2.blogspot.com/2021/01/now-you-see-gemma-chan.html
0 notes
Text
Now You See Gemma Chan
Moving between blockbusters and indie hits, Gemma Chan has kept one foot in stardom and one in anonymity. But this year, she's going famous full time.
BY ,ALICE WIGNALL 06/01/2021
When is a celebrity not a celebrity? When you’re Gemma Chan, of course – or so says Gemma Chan. ‘I don’t think of myself like that at all,’ she says. ‘My life is fairly low-key.’ What, because you don’t drive a gold Cadillac? She laughs. ‘I don’t live in a mansion, I don’t have an assistant,’ she says. ‘All that kind of stuff.’ Beauty Truths With Gemma Chan by Elle UK Previous VideoPlayNext VideoUnmute Current Time 0:39 / Duration 6:34 Loaded: 25.84% Fullscreen CLICK TO UNMUTE I remain unconvinced, and mount my counterargument, ticking off the evidence on my fingers: one, a starring role in an enormous movie franchise (Sersi in Eternals, part of the world-conquering juggernaut that is the Marvel Cinematic Universe, due for release in late 2020 but Covid-delayed until late 2021); two, a new contract with L’Oréal Paris as an international spokesperson; and, three, another recently announced UK ambassador role with Unicef. Guaranteed blockbuster, cosmetics contract, high-profile charity patron: this is the star-making Big Three; the trifecta of global fame. Come on, I say. This year, your face is going to be everywhere. ‘Er, yeah,’ she says, looking genuinely quite alarmed. MARCIN KEMPSKI Chan's path to this point has been one of steady progress, rather than precipitous acceleration, which is maybe why she finds it hard to contemplate the quantum leap her career is about to take. At 38, and with more than a decade and a half of experience behind her, she’s done it all: BBC bit parts (including Doctor Who and Sherlock) and a breakout TV role in Channel 4’s Humans; high-brow theatre and big-budget films (in Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them and, indeed, a previous Marvel movie, as the sniper Minn-Erva in Captain Marvel. The two characters are unrelated but, as she points out, ‘I was painted blue for that whole job, so it’s not like I’m very recognisable’), but nothing on a scale likely to upend her life. The closest she’s come to that so far is her performance as Astrid in 2018’s surprise smash hit Crazy Rich Asians, which made $238.5m against a budget of $30m and became the top-earning romantic comedy of the Noughties. ‘[Because] Crazy Rich Asians did so well internationally, I definitely felt a shift at that time,’ Chan says. ‘Like, on the Captain Marvel press tour, not being able to walk through [Singapore] airport. Then again, things have settled and the slight craziness of that time has gone away. I do feel like I can – touch wood – go about my life normally now.’ MARCIN KEMPSKI The biggest impact, she says, was professional: ‘Before Crazy Rich Asians, I wasn’t being considered for lead roles in feature films. There [is] a very select group of actors in that pool and I wouldn’t even get an audition, I wasn’t in that conversation. Whereas now... I’m being talked about for certain things and then you may meet the director, or you at least get to have your shot. So that feels a bit different.’ Her most recent project is certainly the kind of job you can imagine being fought over in casting rooms around the world: hey, how would you like to get on a luxury cruise liner with acclaimed director Steven Soderbergh and a killer cast including, oh, I don’t know, Meryl Streep and make an intelligent comedy drama about betrayal, responsibility and enduring love? Who wouldn’t? But Chan was the one who was picked for Let Them All Talk, which was filmed on board the Queen Mary 2 as it crossed the Atlantic from New York to Southampton. It tells the story of a lionised novelist, played by Streep on magisterial form, en route to collect a prestigious writing award in England, accompanied by two old friends and her nephew. Chan is her recently promoted literary agent, who has also bought a ticket for the crossing, in the hope that she can clandestinely find out what her secretive client’s much-anticipated next book is about. I wasn’t being considered for lead roles in feature films ‘Obviously I jumped at the chance,’ says Chan. ‘It was a dream project.’ Though not a stress-free one: ‘A lot of the dialogue was improvised,’ says Chan. ‘There’s a scene, a lunch in New York with Meryl, which was actually the first scene that I shot. So I arrived on set and the restaurant was full of 200 extras; you could hear a pin drop. I went in and sat down, then Meryl came in and sat down, and we just had to improvise a scene. I don’t think I’ve ever had such a clenched bum! I was petrified. There I am, with possibly the greatest actress of all time, and... “Action!”’ There is an alternate timeline, of course, in which Chan genuinely isn’t famous. If she’d followed the path that her early years suggested, her current life would be, if not stress-free, less likely to include head-to-heads with multi-time Oscar winners. MARCIN KEMPSKI Raised in Kent to Chinese parents, she attended an academically selective school before studying law at Oxford. She also played violin to a high standard and swam competitively at a national level. All in all, the perfect image of a relentless high-achiever, bound for success in a stable career – until she took a post-graduation gap year swerve into acting, at first with evening classes, then a full-time course. Even now – when the gamble has decisively paid off – she sounds tentative when discussing her original ambitions to act. She did some am-dram at school, ‘but never thought, I could do this for a job.’ Embarking on her acting studies, the idea of a career was there, but ‘at the back of my mind’. That might be because this period of Chan’s life was fraught: her parents were alarmed that she declined a training contract with a prestigious London law firm, and thought she was making a mistake. Perhaps she still finds it hard to unequivocally state that the path she chose is not one they initially approved of. ‘The key for both of them and therefore for myself, and my sister, was the importance of education,’ she says. ‘It allowed my father to have a completely different life to his father, mother and some of his brothers and sisters. Both of my parents are immigrants who came from very humble backgrounds,’ she adds. ‘They definitely instilled in me a work ethic from a young age and a sense of, “The world doesn’t owe you a living, you have to make your own way.” At one point in my dad’s childhood, he was homeless. My amah, his mum, raised six kids on her own. They had absolutely nothing, they lived in a shack on a hillside in Hong Kong. I’m one generation away from that.’ You can sense the shadow of the lawyer she could have been when she talks, and almost hear the weighing up of pros and cons she has done to determine what steps to take. Of L’Oréal Paris, she says: ‘I have been a little bit cautious when it comes to brand partnerships and things like that. I wanted to wait till it felt like it was right. [I chose] L’Oréal because the brand stands for uplifting women and empowerment and they have a strong philanthropic side to what they do, such as their partnership with The Prince’s Trust.’ MARCIN KEMPSKI She talks about carefully considering joining the Marvel universe, knowing it could mean giving over a share of the next 10 years of her life (‘You’re not signing up for one film, because they have additional films and spin-offs and they cover themselves’). She chooses her words with utmost caution when talking about Eternals: ‘Marvel is pretty strict about these kinds of things and I’ve got an non-disclosure agreement like that,’ she says, miming a massive wodge of a legal document. She insists that alongside this diligence there’s a flip side to her personality: ‘I have a slightly rebellious nature. I wasn’t always the best behaved and, yeah, I do work hard but I’m also quite chaotic. Hopefully I’ve found a bit of balance but when I was younger I was like, “I’ll leave it as late as I can, then I’ll pull an all-nighter.” That’s kind of the person I was.’ It’s impossible to tell if this ‘rebellious’ streak would register on most people’s radars, or if it was only noticeable in the context of her own – or her family’s – high standards. I suspect you’d have to know her very well to find out, and she’s far too protective of her private life to make peeking through the veil a possibility. Despite – or perhaps because of – two long-term relationships with high-profile men (she dated comedian Jack Whitehall from 2011 to 2017, and has been in a relationship with actor Dominic Cooper since 2018), she doesn’t discuss her personal life. It’s not exactly a state secret – she makes mention of ‘my partner’ when talking about what she did in the first lockdown (volunteering pretty much full-time for her friend Lulu Dillon’s charity, Cook 19, delivering meals to London hospitals) and Cooper makes the odd appearance on her Instagram account – but she’s certainly not going to give rolling updates on her romantic life. Anything I share could become a story on a slow news day ‘Over 10 years, you learn the importance of privacy, what you choose to share and what you don’t. When you start out, you don’t even know what is important to keep for yourself – I didn’t anyway – whereas now I think there are certain things that I absolutely know, “That’s mine and it’s private.” For me, my comfort level is to have a clear distinction between what is for me and what I’m happy to talk about.’ I ask if she’s had any bad experiences with the press. ‘Nothing too horrendous, but some experiences of not having my wits about me. I’m aware now that anything I say could become a clickbait headline – well, on a slow news day.’ MARCIN KEMPSKI (As if to prove her point, in the week that we talk, Jack Whitehall makes headlines in multiple news outlets in the UK – and, indeed, around the world – for making an off-hand comment in an episode of his Netflix show that he ‘could have got married’ to Chan, but he ‘f*cked up my chance of that’. And, given that this was midway through a global pandemic, it wasn’t even a particularly slow news day.) What she's happy to share on her social media – in fact, what makes up the bulk of her feeds – are her thoughts on a range of social and political subjects, from domestic abuse campaigns, to equal access to education, to Black Lives Matter, to protesting against anti-Asian racism. Which doesn’t always go down well: ‘Every time you say anything political, if it’s in the most uncontroversial way, you’ll be criticised for it; you need to be prepared for that. Every time I post something [like that], I lose followers, so it’s probably not the best business sense...’. But she’s not going to stop: ‘I want to highlight things that are important to me but without preaching. I’m still working it out, how to be an advocate in the most effective way.’ MARCIN KEMPSKI I ask if she feels hopeful about the future, given the myriad challenges she mentions. She pauses. ‘I’ve definitely struggled and felt hopeless,’ she says. ‘I think most of us have realised how powerless we are in terms of the day-to- day governing of our [country]. There no longer seems to be any accountability; there’s a lack of shame. Things that a minister or an advisor would have resigned for 10 years ago, now there are no repercussions. That’s incredibly frustrating, especially when people’s lives are at stake. But, I do have hope – mainly because of the next generation. They’re more politically aware than I was, more involved. Often in the media the most boorish voices seem to monopolise headlines, but actually there are decent people who want to make things better for their fellow humans. There are more of them than youmight think. During the pandemic, obviously it was a terrible time, but there were things that sprung up on a local community level of people trying to help each other. That was encouraging.’ Every time you say anything political, you’ll be criticised for it And, of course, last year Black Lives Matter protests pushed questions about race and identity to the forefront as never before. How does Chan feel about her own role in increasing representation as a British Asian? ‘I get moments where I think, I wish we didn’t have to talk about race anymore. In the same way I wish we didn’t have to talk about why it’s unusual to have a female lead. Why is it still the exception? Why is it still so unusual to have half of the human race being centred in these stories? It seems ridiculous to still be flagging that as a talking point.’ She talks about a structure that actor Riz Ahmed has described: on tier one, a minority actor will play stereotypical, reductive roles. On tier two, your race is still prominent, but the character is nuanced and well-rounded. ‘And the holy grail is tier three, where you’re just viewed as a human. But, while we’re still working towards that goal of much more equal representation, it’s going to be something that we have to be more consciously aware of, and it is going to be part of the conversation.’ It’s a classic Gemma Chan answer. I can feel the burn of her frustration, and I see how she’s thought through her best approach. She’s got a goal, and she knows how to get there. MARCIN KEMPSKI As for her own goals – well, there’s a packed schedule ahead: when we talk, she’s about to join Florence Pugh and Chris Pine for director Olivia Wilde’s follow-up to Booksmart, Don’t Worry Darling. Then, when the pandemic allows, there are the delayed back-to-back shoots for Crazy Rich Asians 2 and 3, not to mention the release of Eternals. She’s also set up a production company, which is working on a range of projects focusing on ‘women whose stories haven’t been given their due, who are these unsung heroes of history’. She loves producing (‘You get a bit more control’), so much so that one day it might be all she does. ‘There may be a point where I want to take a step back from the acting side and, if the producing is established by then, that would be great.’ Hmm, I think. The thing about being globally famous is that once you are, it’s kind of hard to stop. But if anyone can manage blockbusters one month, normal life the next, it’s someone with a big brain, a ton of experience and her eye on the prize. Someone a bit like Gemma Chan. So, when is a celebrity not a celebrity? We might be about to find out. Gemma is an international spokesperson for L’Oréal Paris and the face of Revitalift Filler Day Cream. ELLE's February 2021 issue hits newsstands on January 7 2021.
Luxury Designer Clothing, Handbags . Like this article? Sign up to our newsletter to get more articles like this delivered straight to your inbox. In need of more inspiration, thoughtful journalism and at-home beauty tips? Subscribe to ELLE's print magazine today! SUBSCRIBE HERE
from Online Digital Store https://www.online-digitalstore.com/post/now-you-see-gemma-chan
0 notes
Text
So a huge thank you to those who read chapter 1. I’ve been surprisingly motivated tonight so here’s chapter 2. Enjoy.
Comments are always appreciated.
Thanks again.
Chapter 1
Chapter 2: Hot Wheels
“What do you mean someone wants to kill me? What did I do?” Faraday had been informed that there was a hit out on him, not something you usually wanted to hear first thing in the morning.
“Well I can think of a few people that might...boyfriends..” Vasquez laughed leaning forward on the back of his chair watching the Irishman pace around in front of Sam’s desk.
“That’s not a good reason to kill someone!” He snapped back.
“That’s enough!” Sam halted the bickering, slamming his hands down onto his neat and tidy mahogany desk “Look the fact of the matter is that someone has been hired to kill you and the problem is who.” Sam Chisolm was a confident and stern man so seeing him at his wits end was unnerving.
“So who is our adversary?” Goodnight asked trying to calm Sam’s already wound up nerves. Jack was the one that handed him a two pieces of paper. The Cajun sniper glanced over the files and his mouth felt drier than the desert. “Looks like we have a funeral to plan. Poor Elizabeth. To be a widow so young.”
“What?! I’m not going to die!” Faraday wasn’t keen on everyone writing him off so soon.
“Trust me son. They hired Casper.” Jack explained simply. Casper was one of the best contract killers in the world. There weren’t a lot of people that had seen Casper and lived. The bringer of death. The ghost. If Casper was hired the target never lived more than twenty-four hours.
“Casper? But I thought he only took big jobs….or-“
“Well paid jobs. Someone wants you dead Faraday.” Sam interrupted, pinching the bridge of his nose “We have to plan this well. It’ll take all of us but I think we can pull it off.”
“And if we don't?” Faraday asked, he was the gambler, risking everything was his business not theirs. He wasn’t too thrilled about his life being a chip in this partially game.
“We’ll make sure to give you a nice funeral, güero.” Vasquez joked earning a scowl from the Irishman.
-
The seven had work that evening. They had two businesses. The legal side of things they were hired security the best money could buy and the not so legal part Hitmen. Tonight they were ‘working’ as security. Goodnight knew the owner of the large function hall and they were going to pretend to be security. It was a good ruse to lure out the ghost out to their location. Faraday would stay near the centre bar where it was safest, in theory anyhow. Billy and Red walked the halls. Goodnight had a better eye than all of them and took root in one of the boxes that looked out over the hall. Jack and Sam patrolled the main floor, leaving Vasquez to stay near Faraday but not too close. Everyone was in place.
The evening seemed to go smoothly. Perhaps the ghost wasn’t going to take the bait. That was until Goodnight’s smooth Cajun accent came over the ear pieces.
‘Looks like we have company.’
“Where..” Sam scanned the heads and just caught flashes of red amidst the crowd.
“A young lady. Head to toe in red. She’s headin’ straight for Faraday.” There was a brief pause “Looks like the ghost is a pair. In the rafters. Billy. Red.”
“On it, Goody.”
Sam gave his orders quickly and tried to weave through the crowd towards the redhead who suddenly stopped in her tracks and bolted. The game was up. If they didn’t move quick then the pair would vanish into the darkness and that left Faraday in a great predicament.
Over the ear piece they could hear Billy curse followed by Red telling the assassin to get up quickly. They were all scrambling in different directions. Red, Billy and Goody were to follow Casper and the others were sent to find the flower that was clearly in cahoots with the sniper.
-
Billy squinted and rubbed his eyes as he followed Red through the red and gold coloured corridors bumping into Goodnight at the foot of of the levels
“Mace.” Red Harvest explained and ran past the older man only to slide to a halt on the carpet “This way! She went out the fire escape.” Goodnight glanced at Billy helping him down the hall
“Casper..is a woman.”
“Well I’ll be damned.” Pushing on the long silver bar of the fire door and rushed out onto the metal staircase. Red was the first to spot the sniper already several levels down. Once she knew she’d been spotted the hitman did a very odd thing and vaulted the railing letting herself fall the remaining three floors.
“That’s going to hurt.”
A painful metallic thud followed by loud swearing echoed through the alley below them. A black car sped out of the street moments later. Goodnight sighed he hated telling Sam bad news.
“Cars are ready. We follow them.”
“Sure thing Sam.”
-
“Let’s do this.” Cassandra took a deep breath and rolled down the window of Oscar. Grabbing onto the roof of the car and placing a foot on the dashboard she lifted herself out the car enough to get a good shot at the vehicles giving chase. Aim for the tires.
“So lord help me if you leave boot prints on the upholstery again!” Rose shouted from inside the car. Cass took out one of the motorbikes first, lamenting it was such a shame to scratch such a pretty bike.. The tire burst on contact with the bullet and the motorcycle careened dangerously away from the other two vehicles, the rider jumped from the bike rolling to safety as to not ascertain even worse injuries. “Hang on! Corner!” The blonde braced herself as Rose drifted around the corner. Once safely around the bend Cass eases her grip to shoot at the other bike.
“CASS! GET IN!” She barely had any time to react as a car clipped Oscar’s bonnet spinning the car out of control. The force of the crash sent the sniper flying from the car. She rolled across the tarmac and quickly jumped to her feet only to be slammed by a Chevy. This time Cassandra didn’t get up.
Rose was more fortunate in her injuries only sustaining a bump to the head from head butting the wheel, the owner of the old fashioned cadillac was quick to intercept her.
“Come on Chica. Outta the car.” As the other motorbike pulled up beside her Rose knew it was over, they’d been caught. Stepping out of her beaten up car she looked around frantically for her comrade who she couldn’t see or hear mouthing off to who ever had ran them off the road or at Rose for being a ‘lousy driver’.
“Hey..Lizzy sweetie..can you come round to the main house...I might have ran someone over.” A voice laughed nervously behind them.
Rose ran around Oscar ignoring the tall Mexican that tried to get her to stop running.
“Cass…” there in the middle of the road was Cassandra, unconscious with an older gentleman wrapping bandages around her head. There was a lot of blood. A pair of handcuffs were slapped around her wrists.
“You’re coming with us.”
“Sam, don’t be too rough she’s injured too.”
Rose was in a daze, Oscar was smashed and Cass was being carried away into the daunting black Chevy. What was going to happen to them...everything would be fine. THey had escaped from worse places before.
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
Killer Robots Aren’t Regulated. Yet.
I love that I can unlock my phone with my face, and that Google can predict what I’m thinking. And that Amazon knows exactly what I need. It’s great that I don’t have to hail a cab or go to the grocery store. Actually, I hope I never have to drive again or navigate or use cash or clean or cook or work or learn. But what if all this technology was trying to kill me? The same technology that is making your life easier is being weaponized. That feature that unlocks your phone with your face, here it is attached to a self-learning machine gun. It’s manufacturer, Kalashnikov, made this video to show the gun using object-recognition software to identify targets. They say it gets more accurate the more you use it. That drone advertised to get awesome snowboarding shots, here’s one that doesn’t require a pilot. This ad shows it with a high-explosive warhead. It hangs out in the sky, until it finds an enemy radar system, then crashes headfirst into it. Oh, and that driverless car you thought was so cool, well, here it is in tank form at a Russian arms fair. It’s called the T-14. Dmitry, here, says he sells them to the Russian government. That contract is part of a trend that’s changing the way wars are waged. Like all good stories, this one starts at a Russian arms fair. We’re a few hours outside of Moscow. Everyone from government officials to gun enthusiasts have come here to see the latest weapons. It’s a family affair. Buyers want to know how the 21st-century technology boom can give their armies a strategic advantage. They want to know: Can technology make war safer? But some fear giving weapons too much power because it brings us closer to machines that could go out and kill on their own. They say, we might not be able to control weapons like these, weapons loaded with artificial intelligence. “So artificial intelligence is a study of how to make machines behave intelligently, which means acting in a way that will achieve the objectives that they’ve been given. And recently, I’ve become concerned about the use of A.I. to kill people.” Stuart Russell. He was an early pioneer in artificial intelligence. He’s also been warning people about its potential danger for years. “So a killer robot is something that locates, selects and attacks human targets.” Stuart isn’t so worried about robots like this. We’re still pretty far from the “Terminator.” But Stuart says we’re not as far from something like this bee-sized drone. He imagined one, and made a movie that he hopes will freak you out. In Stuart’s movie, we see swarms of them armed with explosives set loose on their targets. “The main issue is you’re creating a class of weapons of mass destruction, which can kill millions of people, just like a nuclear weapon. But in fact, it’s much easier to build, much cheaper, much more scalable, in that you can use 1 or 10 or 100 or 1,000 or 10,000. Whereas with a nuclear weapon, it’s sort of all or nothing. It doesn’t destroy the city and the country that you’re attacking. It just kills all the people you want to kill, all males between 12 and 60 or all males wearing a yarmulke in Israel.” The weapon Stuart is describing is terrifying, if it works perfectly. With the current state of tech, many experts say it wouldn’t, but that could be even scarier. “The way we think about A.I. is we build a machine and we put the objective into the machine. And the machine pursues the objective. So you put in the objective of ‘find a cure for cancer as quickly as possible.’ Sounds great, right? O.K. Well, probably the fastest way to do that is to induce tumors in the entire human population, and then try millions of different treatments simultaneously. Then, that’s the quickest way to find a cure. That’s not what you meant, but that’s what you asked for. So we call this the King Midas Problem. King Midas said, ‘I want everything I touch to turn to gold.’ And he got his wish. And the, his food turned to gold, and his drink turned to gold and his family turned to gold. He died in misery and starvation. You know, this is a very old story. We are unable to correctly specify the objective.” Machines will always be limited by the minds of those who made them. We aren’t perfect. And neither is our A.I. Facial recognition software has had trouble with dark skin. Self-driving vehicles still need good weather and calm streets to work safely. We don’t know how long it will take for researchers to create weapons with that kind of flexibility. But behind closed doors, defense labs are working on it and they’re not working alone. “Militaries don’t have to invent A.I. It’s already being built — it’s being driven by major tech companies out in the commercial sector.” Paul Scharre, here, led a Department of Defense working group that helped establish D.O.D. policies on A.I. and weapons systems for the U.S. military. “The reality is all of the technology to put this together, to build weapons that can go out on the road, make their own decisions to kill human beings, exists today.” But it’s one thing to assemble a weapon in a lab, and another to have it work in any environment. And war is messy. “Machines are not really at a point today where they’re capable of flexibly adapting to novel situations. And that’s a major vulnerability in war.” Governments around the world see potential advantages in these weapons. After all, human soldiers — they get tired, emotional. They miss targets. Humans get traumatized. Machines do not. They can react at machine speed. If a missile was coming at you, how quickly would you want to know? Autonomous weapons could save lives. “The same technology that will help self-driving cars avoid pedestrians could be used to target civilians or avoid them, intentionally.” The problem is we’ve gotten this wrong before. “To really understand the growing trends of automation in weapons that have been growing for decades, you have to go all the way back to the American Civil War, to the Gatling Gun. How do I describe a Gatling Gun? Do I have to describe it? Could you guys show a picture of it? Richard Gatling was looking at all of the horrors that were coming back from the Civil War. And he wanted to find a way to make war more humane, to reduce the number of people that are needed on the battlefield. Wouldn’t that be amazing?” Four people operating Gatling’s gun could fire the equivalent of 100 soldiers. Far less people would be needed on the battlefield. It was the precursor to the machine gun. And it was born with the intention to save lives, at least for the army that had the gun. Of course — “The reality was far, far different. Gatling’s invention had the very opposite effect of what he intended. And then it magnified the killing and destruction on the battlefield, by orders of magnitude.” Gatling was wrong. Automating weapons didn’t save lives. And Dmitry, here, is saying something eerily familiar over 150 years later. And it wasn’t just Gatling. Revolutions of warfare have typically not gone well. “Before we ever developed usable biological weapons, the biologists said, stop doing this.” “All civilized countries today have given up chemical weapons as tools of warfare, but we see that they are still used by some rogue nations.” And then, there are nuclear weapons. Even with multiple treaties in place to police their use, the threat of nuclear obliteration remains a global anxiety. “Now, I am become death, a destroyer of worlds.” “Early in the war in Afghanistan, I was part of a Ranger sniper team that was sent out to the Afghanistan-Pakistan border to watch infiltration routes for foreign fighters coming across the border. We drove all night, and then began to hike up a steep rocky mountain under cover of darkness. From our position on the ridgeline, we could see for dozens of miles in every direction. And by the time the sun came up, we looked down at this compound beneath us. We were basically in someone’s backyard. We were certain that people would be coming to take a closer look at us. What I didn’t anticipate was that they sent a little girl to scout out our position. She wasn’t particularly sneaky, to be honest. She was reporting back our position, and probably how many of us there were. We watched her and she watched us. And then, she left. And pretty soon after, the Taliban fighters came. The gunfight that ensued brought out the whole village. And we knew that many, many more fighters would be coming before long. So we had to leave that position as we were compromised. Later on in the day, we talked about what would we do in a similar situation to that? You know, one of the things that never came up was the idea of shooting this little girl. But here’s the thing: She was a valid enemy combatant, and killing her would’ve been lawful. So if someone deployed an autonomous weapon, a robot that was designed to perfectly follow the laws of war, it would’ve killed this little girl in that situation. Now, I think that would’ve been wrong, maybe not legally, but morally. But how would a robot know the difference between what’s legal and what’s right?” With so much at stake, you’d think a debate would be happening. Well, there is. It’s just that technology moves at a different pace than diplomacy. “We will continue our discussion on Agenda Item 6A, characterisation of the systems under consideration in order to promote a common understanding on concepts and characteristics relevant to the objectives and purposes of the convention.” “One of the things I learned very quickly was that the official proceedings at the United Nations appear to be completely meaningless.” “Thank you, Mr. Chairperson —” “Support continued deliberations —” “We need a normative framework —” “Difference in interpretation —” “The importance of a multi-disciplinary —” “Down the rabbit hole of endless discussions on a subject of —” “Thank you, Mr. President. We are not in a position to make a declaration right now.” “Good morning.” “How are you?” “I’m good. How are you feeling?” “Oh, I’m fine, except for the governments, you know, their do-nothing attitude.” “We’d like to hear about that.” Jody Williams, here, won a Nobel Peace Prize for her work banning land mines. Now, she’s part of the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots. “Academics attacked the campaign in the beginning years, you know, saying robotics and A.I. are inevitable. Maybe they are, but applying them to killing human beings on their own is not inevitable, unless you do nothing. And we refuse to do nothing.” Today, the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots is staging a protest outside of the U.N. The group is made up of activists, nonprofits, and civil society organizations. The campaign’s goal? A ban on all weapons that can target and kill on their own. So far, 30 countries have joined them in supporting a ban, as well as 100 nongovernmental organizations, the European Parliament, 21 Nobel laureates, and leading scientists, like Stephen Hawking, Noam Chomsky and Elon Musk, as well as Stuart Russell, and more than 4,500 other A.I. researchers. Protester: “Everyone, you can get up now.” “Yay.” Jody’s here with Mary Wareham. “So this is the sixth time that governments have come together since 2014 to talk about what they call lethal autonomous weapons systems.” We’re going to apologize in advance for the obtuse use of acronyms in this portion of the video. “We’re not trying to prohibit the use of artificial intelligence. You know, it can be beneficial to humanity. We’re pro-robots. We’re just anti-killer robots, anti-fully autonomous weapons.” “The C.C.W., the forum of the Convention for Conventional Weapons, — which actually has a name this long, and I can never remember it — operates by consensus. Which means you either negotiate the lowest common denominator, which means doing pretty much nothing, or if the entire room of diplomats wants to move forward with a treaty, for example, and one state says no, then it goes nowhere. And that’s really a dictatorship by one.” “Once a bullet leaves a gun, the rifleman ceases to have control over that bullet. Autonomy is a way of extending human control beyond the time a munition is deployed.” That’s the United States arguing that A.I. will save lives. And remember, without their support, any kind of regulation can’t move forward. “Using algorithm and software to determine and engage target reduces people to objects.” “In the U.S. perspective, there is nothing intrinsically valuable about manually operating a weapon system, as opposed to operating it with an autonomous function.” The United States isn’t alone. The countries working hardest to build autonomous weapons insist we can’t regulate what doesn’t exist yet. And at the same time, their militaries are developing these weapons right now. “The line between a semi-autonomous weapon that has a human in control, and a fully autonomous weapon could simply be a software patch.” “Indeed, some may say it is similar to trying to discuss the internet in the ’80s, ’70s, ’60s at this stage.” “It is not necessary or desirable at this time, to define laws.” “This so-called difficulty of definitions continues to be willful obfuscation.” The truth is, whether they exist or not just depends on how you define them. We don’t have weapons with artificial general intelligence or A.I. that’s as smart as humans. But we do already have weapons that can use A.I. to search, select and engage targets in specific situations. And the technology is only getting better. “So it could easily take another 10 years before they even agree on a definition of what an autonomous weapon is. And by that time, it will be too late. I think for some countries, that’s the point.” In the ongoing race between technology and diplomacy, technology is winning because in this race, the dual-use nature of technology means software being designed to make your life easier clearly has military applications. “The A.I. community, myself included, we were sort of asleep at the wheel for a long time. And we weren’t really thinking about the ways that it could be misused.” Whether we like it or not, we’ve entered the age of the algorithm. And A.I. is changing our place on the battlefield. Is it possible the next generation of soldiers won’t have to kill? “Look, it’s an appealing idea that, someday, robots will just fight other robots and no one will get hurt. I don’t think that’s realistic.” “Unfortunately, if it worked like that, we could just say, ‘Well, why don’t we just play baseball and decide who wins or Tiddlywinks?’ No country is going to surrender until the costs that they’ve incurred are unbearable. So even if your robots are defeated, the next stage is that their robots will start killing your people.” “Because the unfortunate reality is that wars will only end when people die.” Read the full article
0 notes
Text
A.I. Is Making It Easier to Kill (You). Here’s How.
I love that I can unlock my phone with my face, and that Google can predict what I’m thinking. And that Amazon knows exactly what I need. It’s great that I don’t have to hail a cab or go to the grocery store. Actually, I hope I never have to drive again or navigate or use cash or clean or cook or work or learn. But what if all this technology was trying to kill me? The same technology that is making your life easier is being weaponized. That feature that unlocks your phone with your face, here it is attached to a self-learning machine gun. It’s manufacturer, Kalashnikov, made this video to show the gun using object-recognition software to identify targets. They say it gets more accurate the more you use it. That drone advertised to get awesome snowboarding shots, here’s one that doesn’t require a pilot. This ad shows it with a high-explosive warhead. It hangs out in the sky, until it finds an enemy radar system, then crashes headfirst into it. Oh, and that driverless car you thought was so cool, well, here it is in tank form at a Russian arms fair. It’s called the T-14. Dmitry, here, says he sells them to the Russian government. That contract is part of a trend that’s changing the way wars are waged. Like all good stories, this one starts at a Russian arms fair. We’re a few hours outside of Moscow. Everyone from government officials to gun enthusiasts have come here to see the latest weapons. It’s a family affair. Buyers want to know how the 21st-century technology boom can give their armies a strategic advantage. They want to know: Can technology make war safer? But some fear giving weapons too much power because it brings us closer to machines that could go out and kill on their own. They say, we might not be able to control weapons like these, weapons loaded with artificial intelligence. “So artificial intelligence is a study of how to make machines behave intelligently, which means acting in a way that will achieve the objectives that they’ve been given. And recently, I’ve become concerned about the use of A.I. to kill people.” Stuart Russell. He was an early pioneer in artificial intelligence. He’s also been warning people about its potential danger for years. “So a killer robot is something that locates, selects and attacks human targets.” Stuart isn’t so worried about robots like this. We’re still pretty far from the “Terminator.” But Stuart says we’re not as far from something like this bee-sized drone. He imagined one, and made a movie that he hopes will freak you out. In Stuart’s movie, we see swarms of them armed with explosives set loose on their targets. “The main issue is you’re creating a class of weapons of mass destruction, which can kill millions of people, just like a nuclear weapon. But in fact, it’s much easier to build, much cheaper, much more scalable, in that you can use 1 or 10 or 100 or 1,000 or 10,000. Whereas with a nuclear weapon, it’s sort of all or nothing. It doesn’t destroy the city and the country that you’re attacking. It just kills all the people you want to kill, all males between 12 and 60 or all males wearing a yarmulke in Israel.” The weapon Stuart is describing is terrifying, if it works perfectly. With the current state of tech, many experts say it wouldn’t, but that could be even scarier. “The way we think about A.I. is we build a machine and we put the objective into the machine. And the machine pursues the objective. So you put in the objective of ‘find a cure for cancer as quickly as possible.’ Sounds great, right? O.K. Well, probably the fastest way to do that is to induce tumors in the entire human population, and then try millions of different treatments simultaneously. Then, that’s the quickest way to find a cure. That’s not what you meant, but that’s what you asked for. So we call this the King Midas Problem. King Midas said, ‘I want everything I touch to turn to gold.’ And he got his wish. And the, his food turned to gold, and his drink turned to gold and his family turned to gold. He died in misery and starvation. You know, this is a very old story. We are unable to correctly specify the objective.” Machines will always be limited by the minds of those who made them. We aren’t perfect. And neither is our A.I. Facial recognition software has had trouble with dark skin. Self-driving vehicles still need good weather and calm streets to work safely. We don’t know how long it will take for researchers to create weapons with that kind of flexibility. But behind closed doors, defense labs are working on it and they’re not working alone. “Militaries don’t have to invent A.I. It��s already being built — it’s being driven by major tech companies out in the commercial sector.” Paul Scharre, here, led a Department of Defense working group that helped establish D.O.D. policies on A.I. and weapons systems for the U.S. military. “The reality is all of the technology to put this together, to build weapons that can go out on the road, make their own decisions to kill human beings, exists today.” But it’s one thing to assemble a weapon in a lab, and another to have it work in any environment. And war is messy. “Machines are not really at a point today where they’re capable of flexibly adapting to novel situations. And that’s a major vulnerability in war.” Governments around the world see potential advantages in these weapons. After all, human soldiers — they get tired, emotional. They miss targets. Humans get traumatized. Machines do not. They can react at machine speed. If a missile was coming at you, how quickly would you want to know? Autonomous weapons could save lives. “The same technology that will help self-driving cars avoid pedestrians could be used to target civilians or avoid them, intentionally.” The problem is we’ve gotten this wrong before. “To really understand the growing trends of automation in weapons that have been growing for decades, you have to go all the way back to the American Civil War, to the Gatling Gun. How do I describe a Gatling Gun? Do I have to describe it? Could you guys show a picture of it? Richard Gatling was looking at all of the horrors that were coming back from the Civil War. And he wanted to find a way to make war more humane, to reduce the number of people that are needed on the battlefield. Wouldn’t that be amazing?” Four people operating Gatling’s gun could fire the equivalent of 100 soldiers. Far less people would be needed on the battlefield. It was the precursor to the machine gun. And it was born with the intention to save lives, at least for the army that had the gun. Of course — “The reality was far, far different. Gatling’s invention had the very opposite effect of what he intended. And then it magnified the killing and destruction on the battlefield, by orders of magnitude.” Gatling was wrong. Automating weapons didn’t save lives. And Dmitry, here, is saying something eerily familiar over 150 years later. And it wasn’t just Gatling. Revolutions of warfare have typically not gone well. “Before we ever developed usable biological weapons, the biologists said, stop doing this.” “All civilized countries today have given up chemical weapons as tools of warfare, but we see that they are still used by some rogue nations.” And then, there are nuclear weapons. Even with multiple treaties in place to police their use, the threat of nuclear obliteration remains a global anxiety. “Now, I am become death, a destroyer of worlds.” “Early in the war in Afghanistan, I was part of a Ranger sniper team that was sent out to the Afghanistan-Pakistan border to watch infiltration routes for foreign fighters coming across the border. We drove all night, and then began to hike up a steep rocky mountain under cover of darkness. From our position on the ridgeline, we could see for dozens of miles in every direction. And by the time the sun came up, we looked down at this compound beneath us. We were basically in someone’s backyard. We were certain that people would be coming to take a closer look at us. What I didn’t anticipate was that they sent a little girl to scout out our position. She wasn’t particularly sneaky, to be honest. She was reporting back our position, and probably how many of us there were. We watched her and she watched us. And then, she left. And pretty soon after, the Taliban fighters came. The gunfight that ensued brought out the whole village. And we knew that many, many more fighters would be coming before long. So we had to leave that position as we were compromised. Later on in the day, we talked about what would we do in a similar situation to that? You know, one of the things that never came up was the idea of shooting this little girl. But here’s the thing: She was a valid enemy combatant, and killing her would’ve been lawful. So if someone deployed an autonomous weapon, a robot that was designed to perfectly follow the laws of war, it would’ve killed this little girl in that situation. Now, I think that would’ve been wrong, maybe not legally, but morally. But how would a robot know the difference between what’s legal and what’s right?” With so much at stake, you’d think a debate would be happening. Well, there is. It’s just that technology moves at a different pace than diplomacy. “We will continue our discussion on Agenda Item 6A, characterisation of the systems under consideration in order to promote a common understanding on concepts and characteristics relevant to the objectives and purposes of the convention.” “One of the things I learned very quickly was that the official proceedings at the United Nations appear to be completely meaningless.” “Thank you, Mr. Chairperson —” “Support continued deliberations —” “We need a normative framework —” “Difference in interpretation —” “The importance of a multi-disciplinary —” “Down the rabbit hole of endless discussions on a subject of —” “Thank you, Mr. President. We are not in a position to make a declaration right now.” “Good morning.” “How are you?” “I’m good. How are you feeling?” “Oh, I’m fine, except for the governments, you know, their do-nothing attitude.” “We’d like to hear about that.” Jody Williams, here, won a Nobel Peace Prize for her work banning land mines. Now, she’s part of the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots. “Academics attacked the campaign in the beginning years, you know, saying robotics and A.I. are inevitable. Maybe they are, but applying them to killing human beings on their own is not inevitable, unless you do nothing. And we refuse to do nothing.” Today, the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots is staging a protest outside of the U.N. The group is made up of activists, nonprofits, and civil society organizations. The campaign’s goal? A ban on all weapons that can target and kill on their own. So far, 30 countries have joined them in supporting a ban, as well as 100 nongovernmental organizations, the European Parliament, 21 Nobel laureates, and leading scientists, like Stephen Hawking, Noam Chomsky and Elon Musk, as well as Stuart Russell, and more than 4,500 other A.I. researchers. Protester: “Everyone, you can get up now.” “Yay.” [cheering] Jody’s here with Mary Wareham. “So this is the sixth time that governments have come together since 2014 to talk about what they call lethal autonomous weapons systems.” We’re going to apologize in advance for the obtuse use of acronyms in this portion of the video. “We’re not trying to prohibit the use of artificial intelligence. You know, it can be beneficial to humanity. We’re pro-robots. We’re just anti-killer robots, anti-fully autonomous weapons.” “The C.C.W., the forum of the Convention for Conventional Weapons, — which actually has a name this long, and I can never remember it — operates by consensus. Which means you either negotiate the lowest common denominator, which means doing pretty much nothing, or if the entire room of diplomats wants to move forward with a treaty, for example, and one state says no, then it goes nowhere. And that’s really a dictatorship by one.” “Once a bullet leaves a gun, the rifleman ceases to have control over that bullet. Autonomy is a way of extending human control beyond the time a munition is deployed.” That’s the United States arguing that A.I. will save lives. And remember, without their support, any kind of regulation can’t move forward. “Using algorithm and software to determine and engage target reduces people to objects.” “In the U.S. perspective, there is nothing intrinsically valuable about manually operating a weapon system, as opposed to operating it with an autonomous function.” The United States isn’t alone. The countries working hardest to build autonomous weapons insist we can’t regulate what doesn’t exist yet. And at the same time, their militaries are developing these weapons right now. “The line between a semi-autonomous weapon that has a human in control, and a fully autonomous weapon could simply be a software patch.” “Indeed, some may say it is similar to trying to discuss the internet in the ’80s, ’70s, ’60s at this stage.” “It is not necessary or desirable at this time, to define laws.” “This so-called difficulty of definitions continues to be willful obfuscation.” The truth is, whether they exist or not just depends on how you define them. We don’t have weapons with artificial general intelligence or A.I. that’s as smart as humans. But we do already have weapons that can use A.I. to search, select and engage targets in specific situations. And the technology is only getting better. “So it could easily take another 10 years before they even agree on a definition of what an autonomous weapon is. And by that time, it will be too late. I think for some countries, that’s the point.” In the ongoing race between technology and diplomacy, technology is winning because in this race, the dual-use nature of technology means software being designed to make your life easier clearly has military applications. “The A.I. community, myself included, we were sort of asleep at the wheel for a long time. And we weren’t really thinking about the ways that it could be misused.” Whether we like it or not, we’ve entered the age of the algorithm. And A.I. is changing our place on the battlefield. Is it possible the next generation of soldiers won’t have to kill? “Look, it’s an appealing idea that, someday, robots will just fight other robots and no one will get hurt. I don’t think that’s realistic.” “Unfortunately, if it worked like that, we could just say, ‘Well, why don’t we just play baseball and decide who wins or Tiddlywinks?’ No country is going to surrender until the costs that they’ve incurred are unbearable. So even if your robots are defeated, the next stage is that their robots will start killing your people.” “Because the unfortunate reality is that wars will only end when people die.”
Sahred From Source link Technology
from WordPress http://bit.ly/2PjKTCv via IFTTT
0 notes
Link
Do you need additional Unlimited Cash, Unlimited Gold, Unlimited Diamonds, Unlimited Energy and Double XP to Contract Killer Sniper? Don't wait!! Try out the newest Contract Killer Sniper cheat tool online. You will be the best, you'll get big advantage very fast and easy! Hakc Contract Killer Sniper diretly from the browser, undetected. Without downloading to your disc, without any risks of viruses. Satisfaction guaranteed.
0 notes
Link
Do you need additional Unlimited Cash, Unlimited Gold, Unlimited Diamonds, Unlimited Energy and Double XP to Contract Killer Sniper? Don't wait!! Try out the newest Contract Killer Sniper cheat tool online. You will be the best, you'll get big advantage very fast and easy! Hakc Contract Killer Sniper diretly from the browser, undetected. Without downloading to your disc, without any risks of viruses. Satisfaction guaranteed.
0 notes
Link
Do you need additional Unlimited Cash, Unlimited Gold, Unlimited Diamonds, Unlimited Energy and Double XP to Contract Killer Sniper? Don't wait!! Try out the newest Contract Killer Sniper cheat tool online. You will be the best, you'll get big advantage very fast and easy! Hakc Contract Killer Sniper diretly from the browser, undetected. Without downloading to your disc, without any risks of viruses. Satisfaction guaranteed.
0 notes
Link
Do you need additional Unlimited Cash, Unlimited Gold, Unlimited Diamonds, Unlimited Energy and Double XP to Contract Killer Sniper? Don't wait!! Try out the newest Contract Killer Sniper cheat tool online. You will be the best, you'll get big advantage very fast and easy! Hakc Contract Killer Sniper diretly from the browser, undetected. Without downloading to your disc, without any risks of viruses. Satisfaction guaranteed.
0 notes