#Directed Energy Weapon Market outlook
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Global Counter UAS Market Projected to Reach USD 7.51 Billion by 2032
Global Counter-UAS Market Outlook
The global Counter-Unmanned Aerial System (Counter-UAS) market has emerged as a critical Défense and security industry segment, driven by increasing threats posed by unauthorized and hostile drones. With a market size valued at USD 0.83 billion in 2022, the industry is projected to skyrocket to USD 7.51 billion by 2032, demonstrating a remarkable CAGR of 24.7% over the forecast period (2024–2032). This unprecedented growth underscores the vital need for advanced counter-drone solutions in both military and civilian applications.
Counter-UAS systems, also known as anti-drone systems, are technologies designed to detect, track, and neutralize unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The rise of drones for commercial, recreational, and military purposes has been accompanied by growing concerns about their misuse, leading to security breaches, espionage, and potential terror attacks. The Counter-UAS market addresses this challenge with innovative solutions that protect airspace, critical infrastructure, and personnel from unauthorized drones.
Browse Report – Explore the report’s contents, sections, and key insights by browsing through its detailed information.
Key Drivers Fuelling Market Growth
Several factors are propelling the rapid growth of the Counter-UAS market:
Increasing Drone Incidents and Security Threats The proliferation of drones across industries has led to a rise in incidents involving unauthorized UAVs. Security agencies and defense forces are witnessing increased drone-related disruptions, such as airspace violations, surveillance, and payload deliveries for illicit purposes. This growing concern has accelerated the demand for advanced counter-drone technologies to mitigate threats effectively.
Rising Military Applications Defense organizations worldwide are investing heavily in Counter-UAS systems to protect military bases, troops, and critical assets from drone-based threats. Modern warfare now incorporates UAVs for reconnaissance and attacks, compelling military forces to adopt anti-drone systems as part of their defense strategies.
Growth in Civilian and Commercial Infrastructure Protection Airports, power plants, stadiums, and government buildings have become increasingly vulnerable to drone incursions. Incidents like drones disrupting flights or compromising national security have pushed governments to mandate the deployment of Counter-UAS systems in public and critical infrastructure.
Technological Advancements Innovations in radar, radio frequency (RF) detection, artificial intelligence (AI), and directed-energy weapons have revolutionized counter-drone technologies. Systems that combine detection, tracking, and neutralization in real-time are becoming increasingly efficient and cost-effective, fueling market adoption.
Market Segmentation and Key Solutions
The Counter-UAS market is segmented based on technology, platform, end-user, and region.
By Technology:
Detection Technologies: Radar systems, RF sensors, electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) systems, and acoustic sensors.
Neutralization Technologies: Jamming systems, directed-energy weapons (lasers), kinetic solutions, and drone capture systems.
By Platform:
Ground-Based: Stationary and mobile Counter-UAS units deployed at critical infrastructure or military bases.
Airborne: Counter-drone systems integrated into aircraft for aerial surveillance.
Handheld: Portable solutions used by law enforcement or military personnel for immediate threat mitigation.
By End-User:
Military & Defense: Largest segment, driven by the rising adoption of anti-drone systems for battlefield and asset protection.
Commercial: Airports, event venues, power plants, and other critical infrastructure.
Government & Homeland Security: Counter-UAS deployment for border control, public safety, and national security.
Regional Analysis: Key Markets for Counter-UAS
North America: Leading the market due to significant investments in defense and security infrastructure. The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) is at the forefront, with robust funding and initiatives for advanced Counter-UAS systems.
Europe: Countries like the U.K., Germany, and France are witnessing increased adoption to protect airports, critical infrastructure, and military assets.
Asia-Pacific: The region is expected to grow rapidly, driven by rising geopolitical tensions, military modernization programs, and increasing drone-related threats in countries like China, India, and South Korea.
Middle East & Africa: Investments in security and defense systems to protect oil infrastructure and combat regional conflicts are boosting the market.
Competitive Landscape
The Counter-UAS market features intense competition among global and regional players. Companies are focusing on innovation, partnerships, and acquisitions to gain a competitive edge. Key players include:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Raytheon Technologies
Northrop Grumman
DroneShield Ltd.
Rafael Advanced Defense Systems
Thales Group
These companies are actively developing next-generation solutions that integrate AI, machine learning, and advanced sensor technologies to address evolving drone threats.
Request Free Sample Report - Receive a free sample report to preview the valuable insights and data we offer.
Future Outlook
The Counter-UAS market is poised for exponential growth as drone-related threats become more sophisticated. Continuous innovation, combined with strong government support and rising defense budgets, will drive the adoption of advanced counter-drone technologies. Emerging trends, such as AI-driven autonomous systems and laser-based directed-energy weapons, will further enhance the efficiency and accuracy of Counter-UAS solutions.
Conclusion
The Counter-UAS market’s projected growth from USD 1.29 billion in 2024 to USD 7.51 billion by 2032 at a CAGR of 24.7% reflects its critical importance in today’s evolving security landscape. With drones becoming increasingly accessible and their misuse posing serious threats, the need for robust counter-drone technologies has never been greater. As innovations continue to reshape the market, Counter-UAS solutions will play a pivotal role in ensuring safety and security for military, commercial, and civilian applications.
About US
Market Research Future (MRFR) is a global market research company that takes pride in its services, offering a complete and accurate analysis about diverse markets and consumers worldwide. Market Research Future has the distinguished objective of providing the optimal quality research and granular research to clients. Our market research studies by products, services, technologies, applications, end users, and market players for global, regional, and country level market segments, enable our clients to see more, know more, and do more, which help answer your most important questions.
Contact US
Market Research Future (part of Wants tats Research and Media Private Limited),
99 Hudson Street,5Th Floor New York 10013, United States of America
Sales: +1 628 258 0071 (US) +44 2035 002 764 (UK)
Email: [email protected]
#Counter UAS Industry#Counter UAS Market#Counter-drone technology#counter-UAS#C-UAS#Counter-UAV#Counter-UAV technology
0 notes
Text
Navigating the Naval Vessels and Surface Combatants Market: Trends, Technologies, and Strategic Insights
Introduction
The naval vessels and surface combatants market play a critical role in safeguarding maritime interests, ensuring national security, and projecting power across the world's oceans. In this comprehensive analysis, we delve into the dynamic landscape of naval vessels and surface combatants, exploring key trends, emerging technologies, market dynamics, and strategic insights shaping the industry.
Evolution of Naval Warfare
Historical Significance
Naval vessels and surface combatants have been instrumental throughout history in shaping geopolitical landscapes, facilitating trade, and projecting military power. From ancient galleys and wooden warships to modern-day aircraft carriers and guided-missile destroyers, naval warfare has evolved significantly, driven by technological advancements and strategic imperatives.
Strategic Imperatives
Naval vessels and surface combatants serve as vital components of maritime defense strategies, providing capabilities for sea control, power projection, anti-submarine warfare, and maritime security. In an era of geopolitical competition and maritime tensions, nations invest in naval capabilities to safeguard maritime interests, protect sea lanes, and assert sovereignty in contested waters.
Market Dynamics
Defense Budgets and Procurement Programs
Defense budgets and procurement programs play a crucial role in shaping the naval vessels and surface combatants market, with governments allocating resources to acquire and modernize naval fleets. Major defense contractors compete for lucrative contracts to design, build, and maintain a diverse range of naval platforms, including aircraft carriers, frigates, submarines, and patrol vessels.
Technological Innovation
Technological innovation drives advancements in naval vessels and surface combatants, enhancing capabilities in areas such as stealth, firepower, sensors, and communications. From integrated combat systems and network-centric warfare to unmanned surface vessels and directed energy weapons, the latest technologies offer strategic advantages in naval operations and combat effectiveness.
Market Trends
Modular Design and Multi-Mission Capabilities
Modular design and multi-mission capabilities are prominent trends in the naval vessels and surface combatants market, enabling platforms to adapt to evolving threats and operational requirements. Versatile platforms equipped with interchangeable mission modules, such as anti-submarine warfare, anti-air warfare, and littoral operations, enhance operational flexibility and cost-effectiveness.
Electrification and Hybrid Propulsion
Electrification and hybrid propulsion systems are gaining traction in naval vessels and surface combatants, offering fuel efficiency, reduced emissions, and enhanced endurance. Hybrid-electric propulsion systems, combined with advanced energy storage technologies, enable vessels to operate more quietly, efficiently, and sustainably, while also reducing logistical dependencies on fossil fuels.
Future Outlook
The future of the naval vessels and surface combatants market is characterized by strategic competition, technological innovation, and evolving maritime threats. As geopolitical tensions escalate and maritime security challenges intensify, nations will continue to invest in advanced naval capabilities to maintain maritime superiority and protect national interests.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the naval vessels and surface combatants market represent a cornerstone of maritime security and defense, providing nations with essential capabilities to safeguard sea lanes, project power, and protect national interests. With ongoing technological advancements and strategic imperatives, the industry is poised for continued growth and innovation in the years ahead.
To Get a Snapshot of the Naval Vessels and Surface Combatants Market Report, Download a Free Report Sample
0 notes
Text
0 notes
Text
Navigating Trends and Dynamics: Comprehensive Weapons Market Report (2023 - 2028)
In the ever-evolving landscape of global security, the Weapons Market assumes a paramount role, influencing strategies and reshaping the industry. This comprehensive report, spanning weapon types, caliber distinctions, platform considerations, and regional influences, provides a detailed view of growth trends and forecasts from 2023 to 2028.
Embarking on Growth: Challenges and Opportunities in the Weapons Market
The Weapons Market anticipates substantial growth, resilient with a projected Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) exceeding 3.5%. Increased defense spending and strategic investments in cutting-edge weaponry underscore the market's adaptability and potential for lucrative opportunities.
Driving Forces: Unraveling Dynamics in the Weapons Market
Insights derived from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) form the backbone of our analysis, illuminating the trajectory of global military expenditure. With a 2.6% YoY growth in 2020, reaching USD 1,981 billion, and a continued trend in 2021, the commitment to procuring new weapons and ammunition echoes globally, shaping the Weapons Market.
Major Players and Competitive Landscape in the Weapons Market
In a low-concentration market, major players wield significant influence, charting the Weapons Market's course. Recent developments and competitive strategies are pivotal, spotlighting the dynamic nature of the industry.
Exploring Current Trends: Dynamics of the Weapons Market
Surge in Demand for Portable Explosive Weapon Systems
A surge in global defense expenditure and the procurement of next-gen weapons catalyze Weapons Market growth. The demand for Portable Explosive Weapon Systems is on the rise, driving innovation and shaping the competitive landscape.
North America's Dominance and Growth
North America continues to be the driving force, fueled by rising defense expenditure and strategic weapons procurement by the US and Canada. The US, boasting a substantial defense budget of USD 801 billion in 2021, remains pivotal in shaping the Weapons Market.
Future Frontiers: Weapons Market Outlook
The Weapons Market stands on the brink of substantial growth, fueled by technological advancements, evolving defense needs, and geopolitical shifts. The demand for high-precision, lightweight weapon systems, coupled with the continuous development of guided weapons, signals a promising future for market expansion.
Technological Advancements and the Smart Weapons Market
The future of the Weapons Market hinges on technological progress, with innovations like smart technologies and artificial intelligence reshaping weapon development. The Smart Weapons Market is positioned for significant growth, presenting new avenues and influencing the industry's competitive landscape.
Remote Weapon Systems and Directed Energy Weapons
Remote Weapon Systems (RWS) are becoming integral components of modern defense strategies, presenting growth opportunities in the Remote Weapon System Market. Simultaneously, the Directed Energy Weapon Market is experiencing notable growth, offering innovative solutions to address evolving threats.
Conclusion: Navigating an Ascending Trajectory in the Weapons Market
In conclusion, the Weapons Market is charting an upward course, showcasing resilience and adaptability. With North America at the forefront and an increasing global appetite for cutting-edge weapon systems, stakeholders across the board should keenly observe these trends for strategic decision-making.
#Weapons Market#Weapons Industry Size#Smart Weapons Market Size#Automatic Weapons Market#Remote Weapon Station Market#Directed Energy Weapon Market Growth#Major Players of Weapons Market#Weapons Market Analysis
0 notes
Text
Iron Man's Morality
by Damien F
Friday, 09 May 2008Damien F trys to figure out Iron Man's sense of right and wrong.~
This month saw the synthesised superhero Iron Man join the ever-increasing canon of Marvel characters adapted for the screen. Played Robert Downey Jr, and directed by Jon Favreau (who appears onscreen as some sort of unacknowledged personal assistant),
Iron Man refreshes Marvel's old metal-clad, commie-bashing trailblazer, who unknown but to a select few (which includes almost everyone. Iron Man has to be the least secret secret identity in the history of comic-books) is billionaire industrialist and genius arms manufacturer Tony Stark.
The best that can be said about this film is that it's not awful, raising it above the likes of Daredevil,The Fantastic Four and The Punisher, among others. It's a largely competent, if silly, two hours of Hollywood entertainment, and as the first blockbuster event-movie of the summer, it inspires hope that this season's offerings will be a significant improvement over last year's dreadful showing.
However, just as it avoids sinking to the lowest levels for this kind of film, it fails to hit the heights it aspires to. It lacks the intelligence and social consciousness that marked Batman Beyond and the X-Men series, as well as the sense of humanity that made the Spider-Man films essential for fans and newcomers alike.
Seemingly aware of this, Favreau has tried to inject Iron Man with another attribute: morality. The story, admirably faithful to the comic's origins, tells us of the playboy Stark who fails to recognise the consequences of his actions. Be they the friends left stranded at an award ceremony held in his honour while he parties with floozies at a Las Vegas casino, or the innocents killed by the weapons he produces. As he explains to a hostile reporter (shortly before bedding her), his products are essential in maintaining a global balance of power, which ultimately serves to save lives. He has a change of heart, however, when he is captured by terrorists in Afghanistan while displaying the latest Stark Industries weapon the "Jericho" to military officials. Here he sees the true effect his weapons are having on the world, as the terrorists are armed with his company's products. They demand he builds for them their own Jericho. Instead Tony builds an electric-powered suit of armour for himself under their noses and makes good his escape. Afterwards, vowing to protect the people put in harms way by his weaponry, he fashions a more sophisticated, stylish version of the suit and becomes Iron Man, flying around the world at super-sonic speed destroying the militias armed with Stark Industry weapons.
Unfortunately, his morality becomes the film's most critical malfunction. The Iron Man suit is armed with all manner of guns to rocket launchers, and Tony expresses no qualms about killing those who apparently deserve being killed. Effectively, it's a weapon itself, and we're expected to accept that its presence makes the world safer when the sale of Jericho missiles represents such a threat? Perhaps the answer to this lies in who controls the weapons. Where as Stark missiles were sold on a free market, the Iron Man suit is owed and operated by nobody but Tony. However, just as he was naive to believe his weapons would only be used by forces interested in stabilising world peace, it transpires that Tony can't protect the technology for the suit falling into the wrong hands. The issue of a central a source of control of power is also belied by a scene where Iron Man confronts a group attacking an unidentified Middle-Eastern village. After killing the foot-soldiers, he delivers their leader to the villagers and invites them to do what they like with him before flying away and leaving them at it. We jump from highly central military control to mob justice in a single breath.
The confused nature of the films morality is not helped by its generic look at international conflicts. We are told that Tony is kidnapped in Afghanistan, but the true aims of his kidnappers are never fully explained. We can't write them off as the Taliban, as they seem to be a loose alliance of terrorists from all over the world. Following this the film alludes to ethnic-cleansing of regions by the same group, but we are never told why. The Marvel comics have rarely strayed from addressing real-life events such as Northern Ireland or 9/11 (the Marvel superheroes are currently being drafted to the image of the UN). These are usually discussed in a highly superficial way, but it's admirable that they have the nerve to discuss them at all. For a film that seeks to address the affects of Western military involvement in the developing world, it would have been refreshing if they referred directly to the arming of real-life militias, such as the Taliban by Western governments rather than just gutlessly allude to it.
It should be said, however, that one real-life conflict does get a look in. We are given numerous references to World War Two, as we are repeatedly told how Tony's father worked on the Manhattan Project. Presumably the building of the atomic bomb is meant to serve as a metaphor for the construction of a hyper-powered suit of armour. Prior to his kidnapping, Tony tells us that the ideal weapon is not one you never have to use but one you only have to use once. The allusion to the atomic bomb is clear. The trouble with this is that Tony is never asked to consider if the bomb was a mistake. For all the people who mention his father's role in the project, nobody asks if he regretted this or stood by the project. An internal debate over the true nature of nuclear weapons, be they war at its most corrupt and evil or the single stabilising factor in conflicts between super-states, might have serve to address the flaws in the films muddied morality. As it stands, this is just a wasted opportunity.
For those interested in seeing this film, these flaws should not dissuade you. Fans of the comics can rejoice the film's faithfulness to its source material. They even manage to fit in Iron Man's original clunky, aesthetically displeasing armour. Praise can also be bestowed on Downey's performance as Tony Stark. A few eyebrows were raised when the decision to give him the role was announced, as it was doubted the former wild-boy could handle a leading role on such a major production, and his physic could hardly be described as super-powered. However, I suspect fans were delighted with the casting, as his hell-raising antics were suitably in tune with the charismatic Stark. On screen, the choice seems inspired. Jeff Bridges also has a ball as the villain Ironmonger. However, Gwyneth Paltrow is simply annoying as the love interest Pepper Potts. And then there's that bloody reporter, who keeps turning up like a crazed stalker ex-girlfriend.
The special effects for the suit are a joy to watch, but the action sequences lack a required energy. Watching metallic men fight serves only to remind us how much more fun last year's Transformers was. Overall, Iron Man is far from essential, but enjoyable enough if you do give it a chance. I just wish they figured out the sermon before taking to the alter.
Themes:
TV & Movies
~
bookmark this with - facebook - delicious - digg - stumbleupon - reddit
~Comments (
go to latest
)
Arthur B
at 13:15 on 2008-05-09The thing is, Tony Stark is basically a neo-con (witness his role in the recent
Civil War
storyline, which I have been glancing at from afar and tutting at), or rather a comic book writer's vision of a neo-con, so it's probably no surprise that his moral agenda is actually kind of silly and incoherent. From what you say, the film seems to bear this out. Before he's kidnapped he's a pre-9/11 neo-con, selling weapons to the world in the name of an American-dominated balance of terror. Then he has his own personal 9/11 experience, and realises that he can't let proxies do all the work, but has to go out into the world and kick ass all by himself, like George Bush rustlin' up a posse and ridin' out into Afghanistan (briefly) before tackling Iraq. The incoherent presentation of the enemy only matches the incoherent presentation of Terrorism by the Bush administration: are terrorists weak lunatics living in caves, or are they a vast international conspiracy devoted to taking over the world and imposing a global Caliphate? Are we in Iraq to fight terrorists or are we there to allow the Iraqis to choose the government they actually want (which might perhaps include a few terrorists)?
permalink
-
go to top
Jamie Johnston
at 22:34 on 2008-05-21I read this with interest, having a couple of days ago been coaxed into going to see the film with a friend. I agree that it's not a terribly morally sophisticated film, and one might have wished for a bit more exploration of interesting problems. But I think there are a few things to say in its defence.
First, there's a bit of a suggestion here that the film is internally contradictory in that both Iron Man and the film itself appear to espouse a certain moral outlook but Iron Man then behaves in a way inconsistent with this outlook and the film appears to endorse this behaviour. There is an element of this, but not a great deal, I'd suggest.
For example, Damien says that "[t]he Iron Man suit is armed with all manner of guns to rocket launchers, and Tony expresses no qualms about killing those who apparently deserve being killed." We need to distinguish between the two suits. The first one is certainly pretty heavily armed, and he does indeed use it to injure and kill people; but I'd say that's reasonably consistent and plausible in the context of the film as a whole, for several reasons. First, the materials from which he constructs this first suit are themselves armaments of various kinds, and the nature of the materials in such cases may tend to dictate the nature of the final product. Secondly, his main objective at this point is to escape from heavily armed captors who he reasonably believes intend to kill him, and even if we objectively don't accept that the life of one American millionaire is worth more than the lives of several dozen Afghan terrorists we can be reasonably forgiving if he takes the attitude that it's them or him and he knows which option he prefers. Thirdly, he hasn't at this stage had his full-blown epiphany, which seems only to occur with the death of the chap who helped him build the suit. So even if his behaviour at this point isn't especially moral it's at least not altogether hypocritical.
When it comes to the second suit, the criticism is much more deserved, but I would point out that the film makes some sort of attempt to deal with the problem. It's made clear that the initial idea is to make a suit that enables the wearer to fly, and that's it. What later turns out to be the main weapon is originally meant to be a flight-stabilizer, as we're told quite explicitly. He only conceives of using them destructively when, already in a state of considerable frustration, he discovers that his company is still deliberately selling weapons to terrorists. At this point he sets off to visit a terrorist camp and destroy said weapons. Arriving, he does a pretty reasonable job of destroying the artillery without undue injury to the terrorists themselves. When he finds civilians being held at gun-point he does then start killing off terrorists, but again that comes comfortably within what appear to be the film's moral rules since it's a necessary means of protecting innocent people. Where it really does fall down is the fact that he kills the hostage-takers with little shoulder-mounted rockety things that have no obvious flight-related function and must presumably have been intended as weapons when Stark designed the suit. Although that's still some distance from the suit being "armed with all manner of guns to rocket launchers", it still kind of undermines the 'it's only meant to fly' defence. But I still think it's worth noting that the film-makers have at least bothered to put the 'it's only meant to fly' defence in there in the first place, which shows some awareness of the problem of Stark looking self-contradictory.
There also seem to be an implication that the film is unclear or incoherent about what its moral stance is. Again I'm not sure that this is entirely deserved. It's possible to set out in fairly straightforward terms what the moral rules in the film seem to be:
- the USA is good;
- terrorists are bad;
- killing terrorists is okay, at least when they pose a real and moderately imminent threat to civilians and / or Americans;
- killing civilians is not okay;
- killing Americans is not okay unless they are evil super-villains;
- selling weapons to terrorists is bad;
- selling weapons to the US government is probably okay in principle but only with proper controls and mechanisms of accountability to ensure the weapons are used for 'good' ends (such as killing terrorists) and don't end up in the hands of terrorists.
Those rules probably accord pretty well with what a lot of Americans believe, and Iron Man's behaviour in the film by and large follows those rules. They even accommodate Stark facilitating the probably lynching of the bearded terrorist leader (which of course is a pretty close analogy for letting the Iraqis hang the not-wholly-dissimilar-looking Saddam), who is after all a terrorist. If it looks to us as though Stark's failing to live up to his new-found pacifism, it's because he's actually not a pacifist, and never says he is. We make that assumption because it's the most obvious explanation to an audience of arty young British thinking people for a maker and seller of weapons suddenly stopping making and selling weapons; but his conversion is actually a much more limited one that probably makes a lot more sense to the film's target audience.
Of course that brings us straight to what I think is Damien's main point, which is that it's rather disappointing that the film, having decided to ask questions about the arms-trade, comes up with such mainstream American answers without even exploring any other options with any sort of seriousness. That's absolutely right. But even here I'd raise a very partial defence by saying that we may be asking a bit much of the film given what it is. It doesn't tell us what the terrorists' aims are (well, actually it does tell us what their immediate aims are: they've been hired by Stane to kill Stark but when they find out who Stark is they decide he's worth more than what they've been paid and so they decide to force him to build them a big rocket; but it doesn't tell us about the over-all political cause to which this is, as it were, a side-quest). But if it did, wouldn't it then risk becoming a film about "is it right to sell weapons to these particular people in view of their political agenda?" rather than "is it right to sell weapons to terrorists in general?" And it's true that it doesn't engage very meaningfully with the point about the Manhattan project (though I must point out that Stark himself does at one point say he wishes he'd asked his father how he felt about his work). But then again wouldn't any remotely serious examination of the ethics of the atomic bomb be such a big subject as to entirely hijack a superhero action movie and turn it into something quite different?
Again, I don't want to say that the film isn't rather superficial in its treatment of moral questions and rather banal and unchallenging in its answers to those questions. It is. But at least it does (1) show a very limited awareness that the questions exist, (2) come up with a reasonably coherent (if irritatingly Bush-compatible) moral framework, and (3) make some effort to make sense of the apparent paradox of a chap using weapons-technology to destroy weapons. I'm not really sure it could have done much more while still being a superhero block-buster, just like Juno couldn't really do justice to the question of abortion while still being a cute romantic / tennage-pregnancy comedy. X-Men can do more because it does it by metaphor (mutant = black / gay / foreign) and therefore doesn't have to engage with the complex details of real situations. Spider-Man can do more because it concentrates on character and issues that occur on the ordinary human level rather than the social or political level. I'm not sure that Iron Man, given what it was, could really have done much better than it did.
permalink
-
go to top
Dan H
at 09:34 on 2008-05-23Jamie pretty much sums up everything I was going to say about this (although I've not seen the film, I don't see anything inherently contradictory about "it's okay to sell weapons to some people but not others" - it's the same "contradiction" you get in pretty much all movies, books, or whatever with a strong action element. Good Guys pretty much always kill a whole mess o' folks).
What I actually wanted to say was that this reminds me of something a friend of mine once said about
Batman Begins
- on the one level it's trying to be a serious exploration of the nature of fear, but ultimately it's a movie about a guy who dresses up as a bat and fights crime. I think the simple fact is that superhero movies have to work with the themes which their frequently ludicrous premises allow.
permalink
-
go to top
Wardog
at 16:37 on 2008-05-23Mmmm...I'm almost curious now, thanks to Damien and Jamie, but Iron Man has never really appealed to my imagination. I don't know, although I can get behind a man who wants to dress a bat and fight crime, I can't work up the enthusiasm for a guy who makes himself a robot-suit and blows up terrorists.
(I feel terrible - Jamie and Dan and Arthur have said all these insightful things and I've just made this pointlessly frivolous observation)
permalink
-
go to top
Damien F
at 11:18 on 2008-05-27Jamie, I see where you're coming from. Your points on the first suit are spot on, but to be honest I really wasn't considering the first suit when writing the piece. Also, I suppose it's true it does come up with a Bush-flavoured morality (which is a trend I've noticed running through the comics for many years now). Stark arms terrorists and then takes it upon himself to disarm them. The problem I have with this is that it simply ignores the outcomes of these actions, in a pretty literal scenes. Look at your liking of leaving the beardy terrorist to civilians to the lynch-mob "justice" handed down to Saddam (which is something I admit I didn't spot myself). After this scene, Iron Man simply flies away, refusing accountability for what might happen. This was in my opinion lazy and irresponsible, on both Iron Man's part and the film-makers.
There was also a point I wanted to work into the piece but couldn't figure out how. At one point shortly before the fore-mention scene, Iron Man's computer-Jervis-thing distinguishes the terrorists from civilians and dispatches them accordingly. This is a horribly black-and-white approach to its subject matter.
There are two further points I wish to dispute. First, your argument that a more socially-conscious film would have spoilt its blockbuster fun. It may have been harder to make such a film, but not impossible. Since the Victorian days, good sci-fi has always been allegorical.
Second, the assertion that "we make that assumption because it's the most obvious explanation to an audience of arty young British thinking people". I'm Irish.
permalink
-
go to top
Arthur B
at 11:43 on 2008-05-27
After this scene, Iron Man simply flies away, refusing accountability for what might happen. This was in my opinion lazy and irresponsible, on both Iron Man's part and the film-makers.
Are you sure that the film-makers weren't intending you to come away with the impression that Iron Man is a bit lazy and irresponsible? I've not seen the film, so it's down to those that have to make the call, but when I saw the trailers they seemed to suggest a bit of moral ambiguity on Stark's part (which would make sense given his not-exactly-clean history in the comics).
permalink
-
go to top
Jamie Johnston
at 17:35 on 2008-05-27After this scene, Iron Man simply flies away, refusing accountability for what might happen. This was in my opinion lazy and irresponsible, on both Iron Man's part and the film-makers.
Yes, that was certainly the moment that put the greatest strain on my efforts to regard him as heroic. Arthur may be right to guess that at that point in the film we were supposed to be feeling a bit uneasy about his behaviour, especially since that's followed by what must have been quite a challenging scene for a patriotic American audience, in which a handful of US fighter 'planes try to shoot Iron Man down and he ends up (albeit accidentally) causing one of them to crash. Possibly we were only meant to come fully behind Iron Man when he saves the bailed-out pilot. It's hard to say.
Actually that brings to mind another point I hadn't thought about: the most morally problematic parts of the film are these bits in the middle, where he's engaged in his minimally thought-out anti-terrorist exercise. It gets much simpler when he comes back and gets stuck in to the 'main' plot of (1) stopping the technology falling into the hands of the clear-cut crazy villain and (2) trying not to get killed by the clear-cut crazy villain. Which I guess is one of the main things about super-heroes in general: much of the time, the thing that stops us regarding them as morally questionable is the fact that they're clearly better than whatever implausibly evil villain they're fighting. And that's a point that I suppose supports your argument more than mine, in that the least morally successful bits of the film are, as you've said, the ones where Iron Man is engaging with vaguely real-world issues like terrorism and the international arms trade.
First, your argument that a more socially-conscious film would have spoilt its blockbuster fun. It may have been harder to make such a film, but not impossible. Since the Victorian days, good sci-fi has always been allegorical.
Ah, well, yes, I wouldn't want to say it's impossible, but I think your point about allegory is important, and it links with my rather brief earlier comparison to the 'X-Men' films. The latter are genuinely allegorical, and I'd say that's what makes it easier for them to produce both moderately worthwhile moral / social commentary and super-hero blockbuster fun. What they don't do is what 'Iron Man' does attempt and, as you say, doesn't do very well, which is to have the characters get literally involved in real-world situations. The X-Men don't literally fight against homophobes or xenophobes, and they don't literally get hauled up before the Committee On Un-American Activities. If they did, then I'd say there's a good chance those films would end up just as unsatisfactory in that respect as 'Iron Man', because when you allegorize you can both simplify and dramatize much more easily and effectively.
Second, the assertion that "we make that assumption because it's the most obvious explanation to an audience of arty young British thinking people". I'm Irish.
Ah, my apologies! Actually so am I, at least on paper, thanks to Ireland's wonderfully welcoming rules of citizenship. My new harp-emblazoned passport is in the post at the moment, in fact. But you know what I mean. :)
permalink
-
go to top
Wardog
at 16:46 on 2008-05-28I'm just going to start wildly throwing out opinions here despite not having seen the movie because, well, hey it's never stopped me before. I think the thing about X-Men which is, as you say, genuinely allegorical is that although if you were to Take It Very Seriously you could say it's about social acceptance / xenophobia, what it's most convincingly about is being a teenager, specifically the sort of clever, socially-awkward, comic-reading sort of teeanger that I and, ahem, I suspect several of us here were once upon a time - feeling different to, and excluded from, the rest of the world. And because it's very personal it doesn't strain credibility. Whereas it seems to me (from my position of total ignorance) that using comic book heroes to comment on wider social / political issues only draws attention to how necessarily and inappropriately simplistic such commentary must be.
permalink
-
go to top
Jamie Johnston
at 18:28 on 2008-06-02Mmm, yes, I hadn't thought of that but you're quite right. I guess that comes out better in the films than in the comics, in some ways, because (apart from periodic returns to The Original Point) the comics have tended to forget about the teenaged and school-based part of the X-Men scenario. Not that adult characters living in secret headquarters in a volcano / on the moon / wherever can't also be metaphors for awkward brainy teenagers, but less so.
permalink
-
go to top
https://me.yahoo.com/a/kVNzzlR0hezU7J7swspEMkT_LFLpag--#8a2c5
at 23:00 on 2012-07-10
the true aims of his kidnappers are never fully explained
OK, I know this article isn't exactly new, but I have to point out: we find out near the end why Tony was abducted by the militia -- it's in the video Pepper finds when she's spying for Tony. Obediah hired them to kill Tony; they tried to do so with big explosives from a distance; when they failed and saw him close up, they recognized him, so they took him hostage and forced their captive doctor to patch him up so they could get some weapons out of him on the cheap before finishing the job (after extorting more money out of Obediah, of course).
If you mean the overarching aims, the stuff they want the weapons for, I don't actually think that's necessary. In fact, I think that by leaving it open, it makes it more obvious 1, how many nasty things go on in that part of the world, often aided and abetted by the US Military and 2, how little Tony really knows about what's going on with his business.
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Automatic Weapons Market Competitive Landscape, Research Methodology, Business Opportunities, Statistics and Industry Analysis Report by 2027
The Global Automatic Weapons Market is forecasted to be worth USD 9.32 billion by 2027, according to a current analysis by Emergen Research. The key factors influencing the market growth include growing adoption of the Automatic Weapons in the special taskforce, rising domestic violence & terrorist attacks, increasing interest in the adoption of mobile rocket launcers, anti-aircraft & anti-submarine misiles, to name a few.
The report is refurbished with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global Automatic Weapons market. The pandemic and subsequent social restrictions have dynamically changed the market and impacted the economic scenario of the market through disruptions in the supply chains, financial difficulties, and changes in the demands and trends of the industry. Moreover, a shift in consumer behavior has also affected the Automatic Weapons industry. The report provides an in-depth impact analysis of the pandemic on the market to better understand the latest changes in the market and gain a futuristic outlook on a post-COVID-19 scenario.
Get a sample of the report @ https://www.emergenresearch.com/request-sample/299
Further key findings from the report suggest
In January 2020, The Adani Group, an Indian conglomerate, announced its acquisition of a Automatic Weapons business facility in Gwalior, India. With this acquisition, the company entered in the light weapons business where the company will be capable of producing machine guns, carbines, and other Automatic Weapons.
The polymer sub-segment is growing with the fastest CAGR of 6.3% owing to its higher efficiency in the manufacturing with 3D printing techniques and reduction in the overall costing with higher applicability in the sports and hunting purposes.
Key players in the market Smith & Wesson Holding Corp., Freedom Group, Orbital ATK, Sturm, Ruger, & Co., Inc., American Outdoor Brand Corporation, Thales Group, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics Corporation, Beretta S.p.A., and Raytheon Company, among others.
For the purpose of this report, Emergen Research has segmented into the global Automatic Weapons Market on the basis of Type, Platform, Materials Used, Technology, Caliber Type, and Region:
Type Outlook (Revenue: USD Billion; Volume: Thousand Units; 2017-2027)
Automatic Rifle
Machine Gun
Automatic Launchers
Automatic Cannon
Gatling Gun
Light Machine Gun (LMG)
Medium Machine Gun (MMG)
Heavy Machine Gun (HMG)
Grenade launcher
Mortar Launcher
Missile Launcher
Platform Outlook (Revenue: USD Billion; Volume: Thousand Units; 2017-2027)
Land
Naval
Airborne
Battle Tanks
Armored Fighting Vehicles
Light Protected Vehicles
Destroyers
Frigates
Corvettes
Offshore Patrol Vessels (OPVs)
Fighter Aircraft
Helicopters
Combat Support Aircraft
Materials Used Outlook (Revenue: USD Billion; Volume: Thousand Units; 2017-2027)
Steel
Aluminum
Polymer
Others
Technology Outlook (Revenue: USD Billion; Volume: Thousand Units; 2017-2027)
Fully Automatic
Semi-Automatic
Caliber Type Outlook (Revenue: USD Billion; Volume: Thousand Units; 2017-2027)
Small
Medium
Large
56mm
62mm
7mm
5mm
Others
20mm
25mm
30mm
40mm
Others
81mm
120mm
Others
Regional Landscape:
The report offers a comprehensive analysis of the current growth opportunities for various regions of the Automatic Weapons market, calculating their revenue share over the forecast timeline. Furthermore, the report analyzes the year-on-year growth rate of these regions over the forecast duration. The leading geographic regions encompassed in the report include:
North America
Europe
Asia Pacific
Latin America
Middle East & Africa
Request customization of the report @https://www.emergenresearch.com/request-for-customization/299
Key Questions Addressed:
What is the estimated value of the global Automatic Weapons market by the end of the forecast period?
What are the fundamental factors propelling the growth of the global Automatic Weapons market?
Which are the leading regions in the Automatic Weapons market with the highest market shares?
Which regional segment is likely to record the highest CAGR during the forecast duration?
What are their strengths and weaknesses of the leading companies in this market?
Highlights of the Table of Contents:
Report Overview 1.1 Research Scope 1.2 Key Automatic Weapons market segments 1.3 Major players 1.4 Market analysis by product type 1.5 Market analysis by application 1.6 Report timeline
Global Growth Trends 2.1 Global Automatic Weapons market size 2.2 Latest trends of the Automatic Weapons market by region 2.3 Key growth trends
Competitive Outlook 3.1 Global Automatic Weapons market key players 3.2 Global Automatic Weapons size by manufacturers 3.3 Products of major players 3.4 Entry barriers in the Automatic Weapons market 3.5 Mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, and strategic alliances
Automatic Weapons Market by product type
4.1 Global Automatic Weapons Sales by Product
4.2 Global Automatic Weapons by Product Revenue
To know more about the report, visit @https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/automatic-weapons-market
Thank you for reading our report. For more details on the report or to inquire about its customization, please let us know. We will offer you a report well-suited to your needs.
Read similar reports by Emergen Research:
Industrial Lubricants Market@ https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/industrial-lubricants-market
Plastic Waste Management Market@ https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/plastic-waste-management-market
3D Printing Metal Market@ https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/3d-printing-metal-market
Bioplastics Market@ https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/bioplastics-market
Air Purifier Market@ https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/air-purifier-market
Adhesives & Sealants Market@ https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/adhesives-sealants-market
About Emergen Research
Emergen Research is a market research and consulting company that provides syndicated research reports, customized research reports, and consulting services. Our solutions purely focus on your purpose to locate, target, and analyze consumer behavior shifts across demographics, across industries, and help clients make smarter business decisions. We offer market intelligence studies ensuring relevant and fact-based research across multiple industries, including Healthcare, Touch Points, Chemicals, Types, and Energy. We consistently update our research offerings to ensure our clients are aware of the latest trends existent in the market. Emergen Research has a strong base of experienced analysts from varied areas of expertise. Our industry experience and ability to develop a concrete solution to any research problems provides our clients with the ability to secure an edge over their respective competitors.
Contact Us:
Eric Lee
Corporate Sales Specialist
Emergen Research | Web: www.emergenresearch.com
Direct Line: +1 (604) 757-9756
E-mail: [email protected]
Facebook | LinkdIn | Twitter | Blogs
0 notes
Text
Active Protection System Market- Industry Analysis and Forecast (2019-2026)
Maximize Market Research's latest report, " Global Global Active Protection System MarketMarket Global Demand Analysis and Opportunity Outlook 2027", offers a comprehensive analysis of the market. It provides market segments by type and shape, as well as end-user industries and regions. Global Active Protection System Market was valued US$ 3.21 Bn in 2018 and is expected to reach US$ 5.20 Bn by 2026, at a CAGR of XX % during a forecast period.
Global Global Active Protection System MarketMarket Overview The active protection systems include several subsystems, which are integrated into or installed on a combat vehicle to automate, acquire, track, and respond to threats. They are utilized with hard or soft kill abilities to face a different number of threats, which include rocket-propelled grenades and anti-tank guided missiles.
Get a Sample PDF of the Report at : Request Free Sample Report
Global Global Active Protection System MarketMarket Major Market Players
Key players operating in Global Active Protection System Market
• General Dynamics • KBM • Safran • Raytheon Company • Saab AB • Rheinmetall AG • Artis LLC • Israel Military Industries • Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd • Aselsan A.S. • Airbus Group • The joint stock company • Imi Systems Ltd. • JSC RPC KBM • IMI Systems • Krauss Maffei Wegmann The Market Impact of COVID-19 The COVID-19 epidemic has quickly spreaded since its inception in Wuhan (China), in December 2019. All around the globe. As of March 2020, the US and China were the most affected. The COVID-19 crisis has had a significant impact on many countries, resulting in travel bans or lockdowns. Industries. This outbreak has severely affected the global food and beverage industries. This includes office closures, cancellations of technology events, and supply chain disruptions. China is the world's largest manufacturing country and has the largest number of raw material suppliers. COVID-19 has an adverse effect on overall production because it closes factories and creates supply chain challenges. Market growth.
Segmentation of Global Global Active Protection System MarketMarket by Types and Applications:
Global Active Protection System Market, By Kill System Type
• Soft Kill System Electro-optics Jammers Radar Decoy Infrared Decoy Others • Hard Kill System Rocket/Missile based Light Weapon Defense Directed Energy Others • Reactive armor Global Active Protection System Market, By End User
• Defense • Homeland Security
The report has covered the market size by country (regions) for the global Global Active Protection System Marketmarket. Segment by Application. The Global Active Protection System MarketMarket is divided into the North America Europe, ASIA Pacific, Middle East & Africa. The report also includes market size estimates by region. 2019-2027 Forecasts and market size for each type and segment are included. Sales and revenue are included for the period 2019-2027.
Analysis of the Global Active Protection System MarketMarket Share and Competitive Landscape:
This report provides a detailed analysis of the Global Global Active Protection System MarketMarket for all stakeholders. . It also contains historical and forecasted market size information. Trends are also included in the report. The report is simple and simplifies complicated data using simple language. This report includes information on all aspects of the industry, as well as key players like market leaders, followers and new entrants. The report includes a PORTER, SVOR and a PESTEL analysis. The report also analyzes the potential market impact of microeconomic variables. This report examines both internal and external factors that can have a positive or negative effect on the business. This report will provide a clear view of the industry for decision-makers.
More about us: Maximize Market Research has been a trusted partner for many prestigious clients including Yamaha, Sensata and Etnyre in Canada, ALCOR M&A Microsoft and Harman. Maximize Market Research offers market research to both B2B and C2C regarding 5000 emerging technologies & potentials in Transportation, Chemical and Healthcare, Electronics & Communications, and Pharmaceuticals. Contact Us: Maximize Market Research Pvt ltd Email: [email protected]
0 notes
Text
Ethylene Market Report to Examine Manufacturing Cost Analysis, Marketing Channel, Distributors and Customers, Forecast with Major Players DuPont de Nemours, Inc., BASF SE, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company
The Ethylene Market research report presents the current market size, position, and the future scope of the global market industry. It also highlights the upcoming challenges and novel opportunities in the Ethylene market. The report demonstrates the trends and technological advancement in the Ethylene industry. Also, the report offers a practical outlook with detailed analysis and a six-year (2012 to 2019) historic analysis of the global market. It presents the current inclinations over the industries & markets Development, capabilities and technologies along with the variable structure of the market.
The Ethylene market has been broadly segmented to give readers a deeper understanding of the various facets and characteristics of the market. The size of the market for new entrants and incumbents has been assessed using a variety of analytical tools including SWOT analysis, investment valuation, and Porter’s Five Forces analysis. In addition, the report’s authors in the study assessed the financial health of the large companies operating in the industry. They provided important information on gross profit, the share of sales, sales volume, production costs, individual growth rate and many other financial metrics of these competitors.
Request Free Sample Report of Ethylene Market Report @ https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/request-a-sample/?dbmr=global-ethylene-market
Overview of the Ethylene report:
The latest market research largely segments the industry based on product types, application areas, end-use industries, key regions, and competitive environment. One of the central components of the report is a detailed explanation of the gross profit, the share of sales, the sales volume, the manufacturing costs, the individual growth rate and the financial position of the main market participants. The scope of development of newcomers and established companies in the Ethylene market was also highlighted in the report.
The Major Players Covered in Ethylene Market: DuPont de Nemours, Inc., BASF SE, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, Formosa Plastics Corporation, U.S.A., INEOS, Sasol, Royal Dutch Shell, SABIC and others.
Important Features that are under offering & key highlights of the report:
Detailed overview of Ethylene Market
Changing market dynamics of the industry
In-depth market segmentation by Type, Application, etc.
Historical, current, and projected market size in terms of volume and value
Recent industry trends and developments
Competitive landscape of market
Strategies of key players and product offerings
The research provides answers to the following key questions:
1. What is the expected growth rate of the Ethylene market?
2. What will be the market size for the forecast period 2020-2026?
3. What are the main drivers of change in the industry?
4. What are the major suppliers that dominate the Ethylene Market industry in different regions?
5. What are your winning strategies for staying ahead of the competition?
6. What market trends can entrepreneurs build on in the years to come?
7. What threats and challenges are likely to limit the progress of the industry in different countries?
8. What are the main assets that business owners can count on for the forecast period 2020-2026?
Find More Competitor in TOC with Profile Overview Share Growth Analysis @ https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/toc/?dbmr=global-ethylene-market
Strategic Points Covered in Table of Content of Global Ethylene Market:
Chapter 1 Ethylene Market Overview
Chapter 2 Impact on Ethylene Industry
Chapter 3 Global Ethylene Market Competition
Chapter 4Ethylene Market Production, Revenue by Region
Chapter 5Ethylene Market Supply, Consumption, Export and Import by Region
Chapter 6 Ethylene Market Production, Revenue, Price Trend by Type
Chapter 7 Ethylene Market Analysis by Application
Chapter 8 Ethylene Market Manufacturing Cost Analysis
Chapter 9 Internal Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers
Chapter 10 Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders
Chapter 11 Market Effect Factors Analysis
Chapter 12 Ethylene Market Forecast (2020-2026)
Chapter 13 Appendix
Reasons Why You Should Buy This Report
This report provides pin-point analysis for changing competitive dynamics
It provides a forward-looking perspective on different factors driving or restraining market growth.
It provides a six-year forecast assessed on the basis of how the market is predicted to grow.
It helps in understanding the key product segments and their future.
It provides pin point analysis of changing competition dynamics and keeps you ahead of competitors.
It helps in making informed business decisions by having complete insights of market and by making in-depth analysis of market segments.
Insightful Information Of this Report@ https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-ethylene-market
About Us:
Data Bridge Market Research set forth itself as an unconventional and neoteric Market research and consulting firm with unparalleled level of resilience and integrated approaches. We are determined to unearth the best market opportunities and foster efficient information for your business to thrive in the market.
Contact:
Data Bridge Market Research
Tel: +1-888-387-2818
Email: [email protected]
Browse Related Reports@
Methyl Methacrylate Adhesives Market
Directed Energy Weapons Market
Floating Solar Panel Market
#Ethylene Market by Application#Ethylene Market Analysis in Developed Countries#Ethylene Market Future Innovation#Ethylene Market Analysis#Ethylene Market by Type#Ethylene Market Development
0 notes
Link
0 notes
Text
Directed Energy Weapons Market Research Report Forecasts 2027
Market Size – USD 1.50 Billion in 2019, Market Growth - CAGR of 3.5%, Market Trends – Growing awareness of wound cleanser products in the developing economies
A new market assessment report on Directed Energy Weapons market brings to light a detailed statistics on the dramatic shift in the competitive landscape and business environment of the Directed Energy Weapons market for the forecast period 2020 - 2027.
The comprehensive study offers an overview of the current state of development of the business as well as predicts the course of progress across different regions. A large number of factors including the major driving forces, threats and opportunities are taken into account to present an analytical picture of the industry portrayed in the report.
Get more information, Ask for free sample copy: https://www.emergenresearch.com/request-sample-form/240
Scope of the Report:
The study aims to provide a forecast of the growth of the Directed Energy Weapons market by examining the market size, share, demand, trends, and gross revenue of the industry. Further, it provides a competitive analysis and SWOT analysis. The report segments the industry based on product type, application and end-use.
It highlights the emerging trends as well as the novel technology that are visible in the market. The research offers a clear look at the trends observed in the market, the contributing factors, major stakeholders, key companies and prime areas that exhibit a potential for growth.
Browse complete report description and visit our website @ https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/wound-cleanser-products-market
Regional Scope- North America; Europe; Asia Pacific; Central & South America; MEA
Key participants include Smith & Nephew plc., Coloplast Group, B. Braun, Melsungen AG, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc., Derma Sciences Inc., Molnlycke Healthcare, and Medtronic Plc., and Reckitt Benckiser Group plc. among others.
Product Type Outlook (Revenue, USD Billion; 2017-2027)
Wetting Agents
Antiseptics
Moisturizers
Others
Form Type Outlook (Revenue, USD Billion; 2017-2027)
Sprays
Solutions
Wipes
Foams
Others
End-User Outlook (Revenue, USD Billion; 2017-2027)
Hospitals
Ambulatory Surgery Centers
Pharmacies and Clinics
Homecare Settings
Key questions answered in the report
What will be the market size in terms of value and volume in the next five years?
Which segment is currently leading the market?
In which region will the market find its highest growth?
Which players will take the lead in the market?
What are the key drivers and restraints of the market’s growth?
The latest report published by (Emergen Research) Research delivers a detailed inspection of the global Directed Energy Weapons market. The study evaluates the ever-changing industry dynamics that are expected to affect the trajectory of the overall market.
0 notes
Text
Directed Energy Weapons Market Growth Drivers, Opportunities, Trends, and Forecasts to 2027
The increasing focus on the deployment of directed energy weapons and surging investment to improve the defense and homeland security and intelligence departments are key elements stimulating the industry's growth.
The Global Directed Energy Weapons Market is forecast to attain a valuation of USD 93.20 billion by 2027, expanding at a CAGR of 26.8% throughout the projected timeline, as per the current analysis by Emergen Research.
Prominent players in the industry are The Boeing Company, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Saab AB, The Raytheon Company, Israel Aerospace Industries, BAE Systems, L-3 Communications Ltd, Moog Inc., Thales Group, and Lockheed Martin, among others.
Browse Full With Detail TOC: https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/directed-energy-weapons-market
The accelerating adoption of directed energy weapons for the destruction of missiles, rockets, drones, or any other threats is driving the market expansion. The escalating funding for the military and defense intelligence departments and the technological advancements in the sectors such as the emergence of laser-based target focused weapons are further adding traction to the market growth.
Applied Technology Associates (ATA) in June 2020, announced an agreement for developing and installing a platform to pilot target acquisition and tracking on a Stryker military ground vehicle as a U.S. Army initiative to augment the safety and protection of the military personnel equipped with laser weapon systems.
For the purpose of this study, Emergen Research has divided the Global Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) Market based on type of weapons systems, application, end-user, product, power, range, and region:
Type of Weapons Systems Outlook (Revenue, USD Billion; Volume, Thousand Units; 2017-2027)
· Laser
o Fiber Laser
o Free Electron Laser
o Solid-state Laser
o Chemical Laser
· High-Power Microwave (HPM)
· High-Power Sonic (HPS)
· Particle Beam
Application Outlook (Revenue, USD Billion; Volume, Thousand Units; 2017-2027)
· Defense
· Homeland Security
End-User Outlook (Revenue, USD Billion; Volume, Thousand Units; 2017-2027)
· Marine-based
· Land Vehicles
· Airborne
· Gun Shot
Product Outlook (Revenue, USD Billion; Volume, Thousand Units; 2017-2027)
· Lethal
· Non-lethal
Power Outlook (Revenue: USD Billion; Volume: Thousand Units; 2017-2027)
· Up To 100 KW
· More Than 100KW
Range Outlook (Revenue, USD Billion; Volume, Thousand Units; 2017-2027)
· Up To 100 meters
· More Than 100 Meters
#Directed Energy Weapons Market#Directed Energy Weapons Market 2020#Directed Energy Weapons Market Size
0 notes
Text
Amphibious Landing Craft Market Volume Analysis, Segments, Value Share And Key Trends 2020-2027
Amphibious Landing Craft Market: Outlook
The amphibious landing craft market may record substantial growth opportunities across the forecast period of 2020-2030 on the back of the advent of modern and advanced weaponry such as hypersonic missiles, directed energy weapons, and hypersonic rail guns. Furthermore, the growing number of casualties due to frequent terrorist attacks on soldiers is urging governments of various countries to upgrade their weaponry and this aspect may increase the demand for the amphibious landing craft market to a great extent.
The advantage etched to amphibious landing crafts such as higher payload capacity, less underwater obstacles due to sturdiness and durability, and others may serve as prominent growth boosters during the assessment period.
This report on the amphibious landing craft market offers expansive insights into the diverse growth factors related to geographical analysis, recent developments, and the competitive landscape. The report also provides an array of information to the stakeholder about the COVID-19 effect on the amphibious landing craft market.
Request a sample to get extensive insights into the Amphibious Landing Craft Market
Amphibious Landing Craft Market: Competitive Aspects
The players in the amphibious landing craft market are focusing more on research and development activities to integrate heavy-duty and high-endurance materials for amphibious landing craft production. Manufacturers are also paying attention to the varied technological advancements and are upgrading accordingly. The new air-cushioned landing craft launched by Textron with additional range and payload capacity is a classic instance.
Some well-established participants in the amphibious landing craft market are Wetland Equipment Company, Griffon Hoverwork, L3 technologies, and CNIM, Textron Inc.
Amphibious Landing Craft Market: Regional Prospects
North America may emerge as the largest regional growth contributor due to the vast spending on defense technologies by the U.S government. The countries in North America are also trying to expand their naval dominance. This factor may invite great growth opportunities for the amphibious landing craft market.
This study by TMR is all-encompassing framework of the dynamics of the market. It mainly comprises critical assessment of consumers' or customers' journeys, current and emerging avenues, and strategic framework to enable CXOs take effective decisions.
Our key underpinning is the 4-Quadrant Framework EIRS that offers detailed visualization of four elements:
Customer Experience Maps
Insights and Tools based on data-driven research
Actionable Results to meet all the business priorities
Strategic Frameworks to boost the growth journey
The study strives to evaluate the current and future growth prospects, untapped avenues, factors shaping their revenue potential, and demand and consumption patterns in the global market by breaking it into region-wise assessment.
To understand how our report can bring difference to your business strategy, Ask for a brochure
The following regional segments are covered comprehensively:
North America
Asia Pacific
Europe
Latin America
The Middle East and Africa
Related Reports Press-Release –
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/test-automation-market-to-touch-us109-69-bn-by-2025–driven-by-growing-demand-for-managed-services—tmr-300798740.html
http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/4839694
About Us
Transparency Market Research is a next-generation market intelligence provider, offering fact-based solutions to business leaders, consultants, and strategy professionals.
Our reports are single-point solutions for businesses to grow, evolve, and mature. Our real-time data collection methods along with ability to track more than one million high growth niche products are aligned with your aims. The detailed and proprietary statistical models used by our analysts offer insights for making right decision in the shortest span of time. For organizations that require specific but comprehensive information, we offer customized solutions through adhocreports. These requests are delivered with the perfect combination of right sense of fact-oriented problem solving methodologies and leveraging existing data repositories.
TMR believes that unison of solutions for clients-specific problems with right methodology of research is the key tohelp enterprises reach right decision.”
Contact
Transparency Market Research
State Tower,
90 State Street,
Suite 700,
Albany NY – 12207
United States
USA – Canada Toll Free: 866-552-3453
Email: [email protected]
Website: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com
0 notes
Text
Choosing A CRM System Is Like Buying A Garden Hose
The other day I went into Home Depot to purchase a backyard hose. Ever do this? All I wanted was a commoner backyard hose. Except it wasn't so simple. I found that Home Depot actually sold dozens of different types of backyard hoses. There are fifty buttocks stockings and hundred buttocks hoses. There are stockings on wheels. There are vinyl hoses and gum hoses. There are pantyhose made by Flexogen, Craftsmen and Teknor. And the prices mount from $11 to $82. This is the problem with our society. There are too dozens backyard pantyhose to choose from.
This complexity taught me what it feels like when a small company holder is observing for the prerogative hosted Customer Relationship Management (CRM) diagram for his business. There are dozens of good CRM perseverance on the market today. Just like there are many of good pantyhose available for sale at Home Depot. Unless you're a full time gardener you're really not going to know which is the best stockings for your needs. And unless you're in the CRM undertaking you'll be just as clueless when it comes time to research CRM applications.
What is a CRM application, you ask? That's the easy part. It's a database. Of escape and boldness that do undertaking with your company. A good CRM database ensures that nothing falls through the cracks and you don't look like a dope.
By not dropping through cracks, I mean that the database keeps smell of anything pending for a customer, ISP or partner. Calls to be made. Appointments scheduled. Forecasted sales. Potential opportunities. Outstanding quotes. Open service issues. A good CRM plan has calendars, disorder lists and forms so that this sort of idiot doesn't spill through the cracks. It has reminders and automatic emails. It has the situation to timetable follow-ups for others in your company. And all this information should be shared among your employees. Nothing gets forgotten. Nothing gets left out.
And you shouldn't look like a dope either. Because there's nothing worse than when a salesman innocently calls a clients to promote your new manufacture yet he doesn't know that the same buyer is furious with an ongoing service issue. So your CRM summary should be able to flavors a history of phone calls, appointments, emails and other activities with each and every fellow who does boldness with your company. You should be able to run reports on these activities. You should be able to communicate by herds wisdom or emails to a flights of buyer all sharing common intelligence so that you can send them an alert when there's a shutter issue approx a output they purchased or a aviation poster to everyone who has blue eyes, glade hair and energy in Michigan if that's the apoplexy of entity you like to track.
That's what a good CRM sketch does. And if you're observing for a CRM submissiveness for your company, allow me be your gardener here. So you won't get hosed. I'm departing to recommend my appetites hosted CRM applications.
Please remember that stealing a hosted CRM system is a cultural decision. The benefits of a hosted system are many: they are generally quick to get up and running, can be accessed from anywhere and require less way up front to get started. But be careful - some of the business owners I know are concerned approx the downsides: among them is that your espionage is hosted by someone else outside of your undertaking and the long designation spoil (which usually involves giving monthly commission per user) tends to be significantly higher than just buying a conscription outright.
Hosted persistence have grown in commonness over the years. I recommend five. They are: Salesforce.com, SugarCRM, Microsoft Dynamics - CRM, Highrise and ZohoCRM. Of these, my boldness sells Microsoft CRM and ZohoCRM. But I love the others too - I just don't have enough provision to be able to service them. All of these persistence have the features mentioned above that ensures nothing will tumble the cracks and you won't be observing like a dope.
Salesforce.com is the rubbish well known of the escape - it's mature, well written, easy to use and extremely popular. I like the achievement that they have their own passionate developer community and pillar and its surveyors boldness is publicly held and a intention breaths in the industry. Reporting is fantastic and its service and cooperation supplies are among the best in the business. But be careful - there are small business offering but to get the full benefits you tins spend as scads as $125 per month per user for the product which tins be prohibitive for a sty of companies.
SugarCRM is very similar to Salesforce.com but it's priced much lower at only closely $50 per month per user. There are three big advantages to buying SugarCRM. For starters, the firm is trying hard to build a equivalent channel so vitality exploiter can have local nourishment and training. By comparison, numbering of the hosted tenacity I've come across are sold and serviced directly by the software maker. SugarCRM offers both a hosted and an in-house alias for those that proceeding to choose. So if you're not happy with the hosted environment you're not stuck. But the biggest odds to SugarCRM? They provide source code with their product. This provision that if you indispensability to integrate your plot with other systems, like your website or auditing database or if you scantiness to perform complex customizations (and have the proficiency to do so) you tins dig into the bowels of SugarCRM to type it do exactly what you avoidance it to do.
My undertaking sells Microsoft CRM Online so we know all roughly the good, insult and ugly roughly this offering. What's good? The $44 per month per exploiter price, its Microsoft Outlook interface, Microsoft's large channel of Certified Advisors like (ahem) us and its full CRM feature outline type it a mature plectrum for anyone observing for a Microsoft-based solution. What's bad? Microsoft has been playing catch-up with this product and experimentation to policy it as a better chance to Salesforce.com, its archrival in this space. So although the features are fine for a small company, its customizability is lacking. But that's about to innovations - Microsoft is releasing its 2011 elucidation shortly which will be as customizable as its on presupposition colonization and, more importantly as Salesforce.com. They'll also back it with a huge marketing and rod effort. As a (ahem) Certified Advisor of Microsoft CRM since 2005 I can attest that the region around this output has grown a ton over the past few years. I'm a fan.
The finish two hosted stubbornness are great for small workgroups (less than ten people) who shortage to get a commoner but powerful CRM up and jostling quickly.
ZohoCRM is only $25 per month per user (it's free for the first three exploiter with a few less features) and, to me, is a poor man's Salesforce.com. That's why my company offers this product: our buyer tend to be mostly poor, particularly around the time our bills come due. Zoho has won many awards in the perseverance and has a full batteries of features to type sure nothing falls through the cracks and no one look like a dope. It integrates with Outlook and Google Apps. And it's fraction of a suite of Zoho goods for performance projects, documents, billing and other tasks. Zoho is not as customizable as some of the other tenacity discussed above. And its cause draw crowd of its demeanor and all of its subsistence from India which can sometimes be a little frustrating. But our buyer using it aren't complaining. The compensation is justness and the software whipping well.
Highrise is a sweet, little CRM humility made by the good people at 37 Signals. Highrise is super affordable, costing only $24 per month for 6 exploiter and up to $149 per month for unlimited users. I like Highrise because it's a simple liaison manager that happenings with a bunch of other hosted industry for customer service, sales and marketing and company productivity. There's a programming interface for further customization, and nice little iPhone app too. Plus I'm a big supporter of 37 Signals' Basecamp software for directing projects which is very much like Highrise. The downsides? Highrise is at its intents just a conspiracy steward and it's still in its early years compared to some of the others commodities I discussed. It's a handling in progress. But I have faith in the firm who type it.
See? Now you know which hosted CRM request to look at and now you have a good goal which is best for your firm too. But here's some more good news for you. I'm not that pimply youngsters from the weapons section who'd rather be home listening to Jay-Z then helping a customer select the release backyard hose. I'm the short little bald doc from suburbia who IS serving you choose the cheek hosted CRM plan for your business. I craving I had this whipping of approval when I was looking for that backyard hose! And I hunger I had some Purell after shock fins with that kid at Home Depot too.
For more info [ http://teamwave.com/basecamp-3-alternative ] visit our site.
0 notes
Text
Non-lethal Biochemical Weapons Market Size, Share, Industry Report, 2024
According to Transparency Market Research (TMR), the global non-lethal biochemical weapons market is moderately consolidated due to the dominance to few market players. General Dynamics Corporation and Raytheon Companies holds 57% of the market share as of 2015. BAE systems is considered to be the third leading player in this market. It has been analyzed that in coming years, the position held by these three companies will change owing to the research and development activities. Textron Systems, Corp., Lamperd Less Lethal, QinetiqGroup, Inc., Moog, Inc., Chemring Group PLC., TASER International, Inc., and LRAD Corporation are some of the other players working in the global non-lethal biochemical weapons market. Entry of new entrants is also projected to join the market in coming years
As per the report analyzed by TMR, the market is projected to expand at 8.0% of CAGR during the forecast period from 2016 to 2024. The valuation of the market was US$1.17 bn in 2015 that is expected to reach US$2.23 bn by the end of the forecast period. Based on end use, military forces segment holds the highest position as compared to the law enforcement agencies. As per regional analysis, Middle East and Africa are considered as the most lucrative markets followed by North America. Growing demand in Asia Pacific is gaining attraction from the market players.
Interpret a Competitive outlook Analysis Report with PDF Brochure - https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=B&rep_id=20858
Political Turmoil in Various Region Benefitted Market
Anti-national bodies or dispute between growing various uncertainties in nations across globe to rise the demand for the market increases. In times of riots, regional insurgencies, and during natural or manmade disasters military use non-lethal biochemical weapons. These conditions increases the chances of unlimited growth of non-lethal biochemical weapon market. Growing vulnerabilities across nations have increased the defense budget across nation, which will prove beneficial for the market.
Growing human assistance services for law enforcement is expected to boost the demand for non-lethal biochemical weapons market. Changing political scenarios in few regions also attributes to rise of the market. Political turmoil in countries such as Egypt, Syria, Israel, China, India, France and the U.S. have been responsible for the high demand for the non-lethal biochemical weapons market.
Decrease in Defense Budget to Restrict Market Growth
In contrast, several factors have restricted the market from growing. Rising environmental concerns have attributed to obstruct the demand for non-lethal biochemical weapons market. Strict government regulations that denies the use of chemicals, as it will harm the humans on a larger extent, acts as a restrain for the market. Decreasing defense budget in advanced economies have resulted in hindering the growth of the market. In addition, trafficking and unselective use of non-lethal biochemical weapons also decreased the demand for the market.
However, companies and stockholders linked to the value chain are making efforts through research and development activities that will help the market to grow. Companies are also tapping opportunities in the emerging economies that will accelerate the demand for non-lethal biochemical weapons market.
The information presented in this review is based on a TMR report, titled “Non-lethal Biochemical Weapons Market (Operation -Defensive, Offensive, and Genetic Attack; Product - Directed Energy and Direct Contact; End Use - Military Forces and Law Enforcement Agencies) - Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast 2016 – 2024.”
Request for covid19 Impact Analysis - https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=covid19&rep_id=20858
0 notes
Text
put all your paper maps away
@evil-rainbow-sunshine I blame you for this entirely. @nibelstrife you hear all about my whining, you should at least get to see what it’s all about :’D
(Looking back, he’s had chances, and he had a lot of them. He wishes things could be different. He wishes he’d known, that they’d run out of time. Prompto wishes for a lot of things, but mostly, he wishes he’d have said something sooner - had said something at all.
Hindsight, after all, is twenty-twenty.)
P R O T A S I S
Sitting on the edge of the haven, Noctis’ pale skin is a stark contrast against the dark night sky.
They’ve been playing King’s Knight, but Prompto’s battery died soon after his characters did in battle, and out here in the middle of nowhere, he has no way to charge it. It is now lying discarded at his side - at least until they head back to join the others.
Noctis looks completely relaxed right now, shoulders dropped and gaze lost somewhere in the night - the sky, maybe, or the lights of a few buildings barely visible in the distance. Prompto’s fingers itch for his camera as he sneaks sideway glances at his best friend, but with the darkness, he’d have to use the flash, and he doesn’t want to pull Noct from wherever it is his mind wandered.
So he smothers the urge by burying his fingers in the fabric of his grey pants and settles for committing the image to memory - eyes tracing the line of Noctis’ jaw, the soft smile on his lips, the strand of raven hair that’s fallen into his face that Noctis hasn’t bothered to move out of the way.
Before he’s realised it, Prompto is reaching out, fingers ghosting over Noct’s skin as he brushes it to the side. Noct catches his ungloved hand before he can drop it.
There are bruises there, from today’s fight, where something had rammed into Prompto and he’d crashed into the ground, gun still in hand. Noctis runs his thumb over them - the bruises, green and yellow, and the callouses that even his gloves couldn’t stop from growing after months and months of weapon training.
“We should have used a potion on that,” Noctis muses, as he looks down at the damage with a frown. “I didn’t realise it was this bad.”
Prompto feels his cheeks grow hot. “Nah, dude. They don’t hurt nearly as bad as they look. And they don’t even look that bad. Good thing I was wearing my gloves.”
“Still.”
“Let’s save those potions for when something worse happens to be than that, hm? You know it’s gonna happen.”
Noctis looks over and glares at him. “Like hell it will,” he says. “Not if I can help it.”
He goes back to inspecting the damage, frown deepening as he traces the split skin along his knuckles, but then he covers Prompto’s hand with both of his, and Prompto considers the issue dropped.
They sit like that, for a while, just them and the night. Prompto thinks, I could tell him.
Thinks, Now’s the chance.
He’s been putting it off, this feeling that’s been growing and curling in his chest. This feeling that’s been warm on pleasant and warm on some days, and then storming and threatening to overspill on others.
Prompto’s told Noct he loves him before, lots of times. Just -
Just not like that .
It’s not like he doesn’t trust Noct - he trusts Noct with everything he has. But it’s precisely because he trusts him so much that it’s so hard. He doesn’t believe for a second that he’d be turned away, not over something like this, but the idea of things being awkward between them is horrible. Prompto likes this too much, the casual touches and sitting together. He’s selfish. He wants to keep it. The idea of anything changing between them -
He’s just scared.
Maybe tomorrow, he thinks then. Maybe tomorrow.
Slips his fingers between Noct’s and holds on, like he doesn’t want to let go.
Lestallum is busy as always, bustling with energy despite the heavy air, or the heat emanating from the power plant.
They’ve just returned from a hunt, having run out of curatives about halfway through - arguably they were pretty horribly prepared, but alas, when you need money, you gotta make do with what you have. Prompto thinks the cut on Gladio’s arm is the worst of it though; Ignis looks appropriately ruffled, and both Noct and he are gonna be sore as all hell tomorrow, but for now, they’re slouched in their plastic chairs, grinning like they won tickets to the chocobo fair.
It’s effort justification, really. They got banged up pretty well, and they’re tired, but they made it, they’re alive, and they’re safe inside the city limits.
Ignis returns to their table and sets down a tray with a large jug of iced tea and four glasses.
“Oh my god, Iggy,” Prompto moans. “I could kiss you right now.”
“I’d rather you didn’t.” Ignis adjusts his glasses and sits down. “But I’m sure I’ll be in need of assistance with cleaning up the next time we make camp. If you’d like to express your gratitude, that is.”
“I just might. Oh gods.”
Noctis snorts and pours him a glass, and Prompto empties it in the time it takes him to fill the others.
“I’ll see about making reservations at the Leville. Shall we rendezvous there in, say, two hours?”
Prompto’s eyes grow wide. “You’re letting us sleep in actual beds tonight? Noct, he’s letting us sleep in beds tonight.”
“I know,” Noctis laughs. “I convinced him. I absolutely can’t do camping tonight. Sorry, Gladio.”
Gladio shrugs, and then snorts when Prompto clasps Noctis’ hand with both of his. “I love you, buddy. So much right now. You know I’d die for you, right? I’d kill spiders for you.”
“Careful, Noct,” Gladio laughs. “He’ll be asking to marry you if you keep this up.”
It’s a joke - a stupid, stupid joke, but Prompto can’t stop himself freezing for a moment. He’s stuck - what would be more obvious, moving away, or staying right there, hanging on Noctis’ arm?
Ignis speaks up without missing a beat, and Prompto straightens, slowly - inconspicuously, he hopes. “I must beg to differ, Gladio. There are protocols in place, concerning the courting of royalty. I’m sure even Prompto is aware.”
“Well,” Prompto laughs, and hopes to the gods it doesn’t sound as nervous to them as it does to his own ears. “I’m sure it doesn’t involve asking over a sticky table and a glass of iced tea.”
“Indeed, it does not.” There’s a glint in Ignis’ eyes that Prompto can’t quite decipher. It’s unsettling sometimes, how unreadable Ignis can be.
Gladio stands up and stretches. “Can you even imagine? King Noctis and his consort, Prompto. Come on, Iggy, I’ll walk with you. You two kids play nice.”
“We’ll have to take the kingdom back, then,” Ignis says, “to be able to insure that it remains standing under their reign.”
“Well, I’ll be keeping them safe. You’ll protect the kingdom.”
“Guys,” Noctis says, standing. His eyebrow is raised in that perfect arch that means someone’s walking on thin ice. “Let it go.”
Gladio gives a mock salute, and he and Ignis start walking in the direction of the hotel.
“Besides,” Ignis adds, and Prompto is sure he isn’t imagining the way he speaks loudly enough for them to hear. “I must beg to differ, Gladio. I’m sure Noct here is the one that will propose eventually.”
“Yeah?” Gladio smirks, a glint in his eyes. “You wanna bet?”
Prompto buries his burning head in his hands.
.
.
Continue reading on AO3?
24 notes
·
View notes