#Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia

[newsxbyte]

Liquor wholesalers posing as retailers? CAG report unveils ‘preferential’ licensing by AAP in alleged Delhi excise scam

The CAG report on Delhi Liquor Policy, tabled in the Delhi Assembly on Tuesday, claims that the group of Ministers (GoM), headed by then Deputy Chief Minister and Excise Minister Manish Sisodia, changed the recommendations of the expert panel formed to formulate the policy. The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report – ‘Performance Audit on Regulation and Supply of Liquor in Delhi’ – is one…

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] Kumar Rakesh New Delhi, 10th Feb. Bharat, the world’s largest democracy, is facing a series of challenges that are reshaping its political and social landscape. From violent assaults on public officials to ideological battles over nationalism and security, the nation finds itself at a critical juncture. The resurgence of separatist movements, communal tensions, and debates over governance have intensified divisions, testing the resilience of its democratic institutions. As protests erupt, security concerns rise, and political clashes dominate headlines, the need for dialogue, accountability, and reform has never been more urgent. Amidst these turbulent times, Bharat must navigate a path that upholds its core values of unity, justice, and democratic integrity. Alleged Assault on Delhi’s Chief Secretary In February 2018, a significant controversy emerged when Delhi’s Chief Secretary, Anshu Prakash, alleged that he was assaulted during a meeting at then Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s residence. The meeting, held at midnight, was reportedly convened to discuss issues related to the distribution of ration to citizens. Prakash claimed that he was physically attacked by two Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MLAs in the presence of Kejriwal and Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia. This incident led to widespread condemnation and highlighted the strained relationship between the elected government and the bureaucratic machinery in Delhi. The legal proceedings that followed saw various developments. In October 2018, Kejriwal, Sisodia, and 11 other AAP legislators were granted bail by the Patiala House Court. The court proceedings continued over the years, with the former Chief Secretary labeling Kejriwal and Sisodia as the “kingpins” of the conspiracy. However, in August 2021, a Delhi court discharged Kejriwal, Sisodia, and others in the case, citing insufficient evidence to proceed to trial. This decision was upheld in subsequent appeals, bringing a controversial end to the high-profile case. Support for Khalistan Movement The resurgence of support for the Khalistan movement, advocating for a separate Sikh homeland, has raised alarms. Events like the Khalistan Referendum in Calgary, Canada, which honored individuals designated as terrorists, have internationalized the issue. The Bharatiya government has expressed concerns over foreign entities supporting separatist movements, viewing them as threats to national unity and security. Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) Protests and Riots The enactment of the Citizenship Amendment Act led to widespread protests across the country, culminating in the 2020 Delhi riots. The violence resulted in significant loss of life and property, exposing deep-seated communal tensions. Critiques have been directed at the Delhi Police for their handling of the situation, with allegations of inaction and complicity. The riots underscored the challenges in balancing legislative actions with societal harmony. Murder of Ankit Sharma Ankit Sharma, an Intelligence Bureau officer, was tragically killed during the Delhi riots. His death became emblematic of the chaos and brutality of the period. Investigations led to arrests, but the incident highlighted the perils faced by security personnel during civil unrest and the need for robust protective measures. Opposition to the Indian Army Segments of society have voiced opposition to the Indian Army’s actions in certain regions, leading to a polarized discourse on national security and human rights. While some criticize alleged excesses, others emphasize the army’s role in maintaining sovereignty and internal stability. This dichotomy reflects the broader debate on the balance between security and civil liberties. Support for ‘Tukde Tukde’ Gang The term ‘Tukde Tukde’ gang has been used to describe groups perceived as advocating for the fragmentation of Bharat. Support for such entities has been a contentious issue, with accusations of sedition leveled against activists and students.

This has sparked debates on freedom of expression and the limits of dissent in a democratic society. Settlement of Rohingya Refugees in Delhi The issue of Rohingya refugees has been a contentious topic in Bharat, particularly concerning their settlement in the national capital. The Rohingya, a predominantly Muslim ethnic group from Myanmar, have fled persecution and sought refuge in various countries, including Bharat. Estimates suggest that around 40,000 Rohingya reside in Bharat, with significant populations in Jammu, Hyderabad, and Delhi. In recent times, the presence of Rohingya refugees in Delhi has become a focal point of political debate. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have exchanged accusations over the settlement and support of these refugees. AAP leaders have alleged that the central government facilitated the settlement of Rohingyas in Delhi, while BJP leaders have countered that the AAP government provided them with amenities and support. The legal status of Rohingya refugees in Bharat remains precarious. Bharat is not a signatory to the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, and as such, Rohingyas are often classified as illegal immigrants. This classification has led to challenges in accessing basic services. In February 2025, the Supreme Court of India was set to hear a plea from an NGO seeking directions to grant Rohingya refugees access to public schools and hospitals. The plea highlighted that many refugees were denied these services due to the lack of Aadhaar cards, despite possessing UNHCR identification. The incidents discussed above underscore the complex interplay between politics, governance, and human rights in Bharat. The alleged assault on the Chief Secretary highlighted the tensions that can arise between elected representatives and bureaucrats, emphasizing the need for clear protocols and mutual respect to ensure effective governance. On the other hand, the situation of Rohingya refugees brings to the fore the challenges of balancing national security concerns with humanitarian obligations. While it is essential to ensure the country’s security, it is equally important to uphold the principles of compassion and provide basic human rights to those seeking refuge. Conclusion Bharat’s journey as a diverse and democratic nation is fraught with challenges that test its institutional frameworks and societal values. The incidents of the alleged assault on the Chief Secretary and the debates over Rohingya settlements are reflective of broader issues that require nuanced and balanced approaches. It is imperative for all stakeholders, including the government, judiciary, civil society, and citizens, to engage in constructive dialogue, uphold the rule of law, and foster an environment that respects human rights and democratic principles. Only through such collective efforts can Bharat navigate its complexities and continue on its path of progress and inclusivity.   The post Bharat at a Crossroads: Political Unrest, National Security, and the Battle for Unity appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[nuturalzone]

New Delhi, India – Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party has returned to power in the country’s capital Delhi after 27 years, trouncing Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and his Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in a major setback for the anti-BJP opposition.

Twelve years since their sensational ride to power in the 2013 assembly elections on the back of a popular anticorruption movement, it was clear Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia, his deputy, had lost their constituencies well before vote counting had finished on Saturday.

The AAP temporarily locked down its party headquarters in central Delhi on Saturday afternoon as celebrations broke out at the nearby BJP offices, adorned in the party colour of saffron, with party workers dancing and distributing sweets. “Development wins, good governance triumphs,” Modi wrote on X.

[odnewsin]

BJP trails AAP in Delhi, wins five against six; Parvesh Verma claims Kejriwal’s seat

New Delhi: The BJP won five seats and AAP six in the Delhi Assembly election, according to the latest EC data. The saffron party is poised to form a government in Delhi after 26 years, with the latest Election Commission (EC) trends showing the BJP ahead in a further 43 of Delhi’s 70 seats and AAP in 16. Former deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia has conceded defeat to the BJP’s Tarvinder Singh…

[newsriveting]

ED gets Centre's nod to prosecute Kejriwal, Sisodia in excise policy case

File picture of Arvind Kejriwal with Manish Sisodia (left) Team News Riveting New Delhi, January 15 The Union Home Ministry (MHA) Wednesday granted sanction to the Enforcement Directorate to prosecute former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and his ex-deputy Manish Sisodia in the excise policy linked money laundering case. Kejriwal, the national convenor of Aam Adami Party (AAP), had…

[bhaskarlive]

Delhi liquor policy scam: SC relaxes Sisodia’s bail condition

The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed a plea filed by senior Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia seeking relaxation of the bail condition requiring him to report to the Investigating Officer semi-weekly.

Source: bhaskarlive.in

[werindialive]

CBI Accuses Kejriwal and AAP of Criminal Conspiracy in Excise Policy Case 

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has filed a supplementary charge sheet accusing Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and his party, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), of a criminal conspiracy to privatise the 2021 Delhi Excise Policy for financial gains. The CBI claims that the policy was specifically designed to benefit select liquor businesses in exchange for kickbacks, which were allegedly used to fund AAP’s campaign in the 2022 Goa Assembly elections. 

The investigation highlights that Vijay Nair, AAP’s media and communications head, played a pivotal role in the conspiracy. According to the CBI, Nair, without any formal authority to negotiate on excise matters, solicited bribes from liquor business owners under Kejriwal’s direct instructions. These businesses were promised favourable terms under the excise policy in return for their financial contributions. The CBI alleges that these funds were funnelled into AAP’s election expenditures and used to pay for campaign-related activities, including hiring vendors and campaign managers. 

Durgesh Pathak, a senior AAP leader, is also named in the charge sheet for managing these funds. The CBI claims that Pathak oversaw the transfer of bribe money through hawala channels, which allowed large sums to be distributed without leaving a clear financial trail. The charge sheet points out that these cash payments were deliberately omitted from AAP’s official election expense reports, raising concerns about the party's financial transparency. 

Several other high-profile AAP leaders, including former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia, have been implicated. Sisodia, who oversaw the excise department at the time, was previously arrested in connection with the case but has since been released on bail. Kejriwal, who has denied all allegations, has been in custody since March 2024. His bail plea is currently being reviewed by the Supreme Court. 

The CBI asserts that it has gathered substantial evidence, including documents and witness testimonies, to support its claims. The case has sparked widespread political controversy, with opposition parties accusing AAP of corruption and financial misconduct. As the investigation continues, the case could have significant political ramifications for AAP, particularly as the party prepares for future elections. If proven, the allegations could severely impact AAP’s reputation and leadership, potentially undermining its governance in Delhi and beyond. 

The investigation is ongoing, and the political fallout from the case is being closely monitored. Further developments are expected as the legal process advances. For more politics news in Hindi, subscribe to our newsletter. 

[news-venue]

"Travesty Of Justice": Manish Sisodia Gets Bail, Supreme Court Slams Delay

Manish Sisodia was granted bail by the Supreme Court Friday morning - nearly 18 months after the ex-Delhi Deputy Chief Minister was arrested by the CBI in the alleged liquor policy case. In a powerful verdict the court said he is entitled to a "speedy trial" and that a rejection now would force him to work his way back up the system. "It would be like making him play snakes and ladders," the top court said.

"In a matter pertaining to the life and liberty of a citizen - which is one of the most sacrosanct rights guaranteed by the Constitution - a citizen cannot be made to run from pillar to post," the court said.

Mr Sisodia was arrested by the CBI on February 26, 2023, and by the Enforcement Directorate less than two weeks later. He has now been granted bail in both cases, with an irate Supreme Court stating he cannot stay in jail indefinitely while the prosecution works to an unconfirmed trial date.

A bench of Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan also said keeping the Aam Aadmi Party leader in jailed for an "unlimited time", without a trial, is in violation of his fundamental rights.

"Incarceration of 18 months… Trial not having even commenced and appellant has been deprived of right to speedy trial, " Justice Gavai said as he asked tough questions of the lower courts.

"Keeping appellant behind bars for unlimited time will deny fundamental right. Appellant has deep roots in society… no apprehension of fleeing. Anyway… conditions can be imposed."

Manish Sisodia could not be made to run "from pillar to post" to secure bail, the court said.

In May the Delhi High Court refused bail, reasoning he could influence witnesses and destroy evidence. The following month the Supreme Court also refused a plea, noting, though, that Mr Sisodia could revive his application once the ED and CBI file their final complaints.

Mr Kejriwal has already secured bail for his arrest by the ED. However, since he was re-arrested, by the CBI, days after his bail in the ED case was confirmed by the High Court, he is still behind bars.

[petnews2day]

Delhi High Court seeks CBI, ED response in Manish Sisodia bail pleas

New Post has been published on https://petn.ws/vIXgT

Delhi High Court seeks CBI, ED response in Manish Sisodia bail pleas

Delhi News Live Updates: The Delhi High Court has sought the response of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on the bail pleas of former deputy chief minister and AAP leader Manish Sisodia in connection with the excise policy case. A single-judge bench of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma issued notice […]

See full article at https://petn.ws/vIXgT #OtherNews

[bhattandjoshiassociates-blog]

K Kavitha Case: Legal Dynamics and Political Ramifications - A Comprehensive Analysis of the Supreme Court's Decision

Introduction The recent ruling by the Supreme Court in the case involving K Kavitha, a leader of the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS), has ignited widespread debate and scrutiny. This comprehensive analysis delves into the intricate legal dynamics, the political ramifications, and the broader implications of the Court's decision. The Context: K Kavitha Legal Battle K Kavitha's entanglement in a money laundering case linked to the Delhi Excise Policy has thrust her into the spotlight. The Enforcement Directorate's (ED) allegations and subsequent arrest have set the stage for a legal showdown with far-reaching consequences. The Supreme Court's intervention becomes pivotal in navigating the complexities of justice and politics. Understanding the Supreme Court's Decision The Supreme Court's refusal to grant urgent relief to K Kavitha, while directing her to seek bail from the trial court, marks a significant development in the legal saga. A special bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna, MM Sundresh, and Bela M Trivedi underscored the need for adherence to due process while refraining from commenting on the merits of the case. Legal Proceedings: A Complex Landscape  The legal landscape surrounding K Kavitha's case is multifaceted, with implications extending beyond individual culpability. The Court's decision to issue notice in Kavitha's challenge against provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and to tag the matter with petitions seeking review of the Vijay Madanlal judgment reflects the intricacies of legal procedure and precedent. The Bail Conundrum for K Kavitha The expeditious consideration of Kavitha's bail plea emerges as a central concern amidst the legal proceedings. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal's impassioned pleas for a fair hearing and his emotional appeal underscore the gravity of the situation. The delicate balance between legal impartiality and political influence comes to the fore as the Court navigates through the complexities of bail jurisprudence. Political Implications: Balancing Justice and Influence  The intersection of law and politics in K Kavitha's case raises profound questions about the sanctity of democratic institutions and the role of political actors in shaping legal outcomes. The Court's assertion that political status does not confer special privileges underscores the imperative of upholding the rule of law in a democratic society. Allegations and Investigations: Unraveling the Excise Policy Scandal The Enforcement Directorate's allegations against K Kavitha and her alleged involvement in the "South Group" lobby of liquor traders shed light on the intricate web of corruption and political intrigue surrounding the excise policy case. The ED's investigation into kickbacks and illicit transactions underscores the gravity of the charges and the imperative of accountability in public office. Legal Precedent and Judicial Discourse K Kavitha's case joins a list of high-profile arrests in connection with the excise policy case, including former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia and AAP Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh. The legal precedent set by the Court in adjudicating these cases reverberates across the legal landscape, shaping future jurisprudence and judicial discourse. Arvind Kejriwal's Response: Navigating Political Turmoil Amidst K Kavitha Legal Battle Following K Kavitha's arrest, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's decision to move the Supreme Court adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing legal saga. His strategic maneuvering and political resilience in the face of adversity underscore the symbiotic relationship between law and politics in shaping public discourse and electoral outcomes. Conclusion: Toward Justice and Accountability in K Kavitha Case As the legal proceedings unfold, the nation grapples with the complexities of justice, accountability, and political expediency. The Supreme Court's role as the arbiter of truth and fairness becomes paramount in upholding the principles of democracy and the rule of law. In navigating the intricate legal dynamics and political ramifications of K Kavitha's case, the Court charts a course toward justice and accountability, ensuring that the wheels of justice continue to turn in the service of the nation. Read the full article

[angel0news]

After Probe Agency's Big Claim Against BRS Leader K Kavitha, AAP's Retort

Probe agencies CBI and ED have both claimed to made headway into their Delhi liquor policy case investigation. The Central Bureau of Investigation has told the court that they could arrest some "high-profile persons" as they probe alleged money laundering in the now-scrapped Delhi excise policy for 2021-22, which allegedly benefited certain liquor dealers

The Enforcement Directorate also put forth a theory alleging that BRS leader K Kavitha conspired with Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and other AAP leaders in the case. The agency alleges that Kavitha paid ₹ 100 crore to Aam Aadmi Party leaders.

Kavitha, the daughter of former Telangana chief minister K Chandrashekar Rao, was arrested by the agency last week from her Hyderabad home and she is in the ED custody till March 23.

"Probe found that Ms K Kavitha along with others conspired with the top leaders of AAP including Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia for getting favours in the Delhi excise policy-formulation and implementation," the ED said in a statement.

"In exchange of these favours, she was involved in paying ₹ 100 crore to the leaders of AAP," the agency said.

The agency claimed that by the acts of "corruption and conspiracy" in the formulation and implementation of Delhi excise policy 2021-22, a continuous stream of illegal funds in the form of kickbacks from the wholesalers was generated for the AAP, it said.

The Aam Aadmi Party though, has denied all these charges and alleged that the probe is being used to malign Mr Kejriwal's image ahead of the Lok Sabha elections.

"On earlier occasions too, ED has released such blatantly false and frivolous statements which show that instead of being a neutral investigative agency, it is working like a political wing of BJP," AAP said in a statement.

No immediate reaction was available from the BJP over the AAP's charge.

The AAP said the agency's charges are a "desperate attempt" to malign the image of its Mr Kejriwal and former deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia by "planting falsehoods and creating a media sensation" every day.

"ED's statement, which presents no new fact or evidence, speaks volumes of its frustration since they have not recovered a single rupee or piece of evidence in this case, despite carrying out over 500 raids and questioning thousands of witnesses," the AAP said.

The ED and the CBI had alleged that the Delhi government's excise policy to grant licences to liquor traders allowed cartelisation and favoured certain dealers who had allegedly paid bribes for it, a charge strongly refuted by the AAP.

The policy was scrapped by the Kejriwal government, days after Delhi L-G VK Saxena in July 2022 recommended a CBI probe into alleged irregularities in its formulation and implementation. Later, a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) linked to the excise policy case, was registered by the ED.

[newnewz]

Delhi Court Summons Arvind Kejriwal Following Fresh Complaint from Probe Agency

In the ongoing saga surrounding the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) summons to Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and his steadfast refusal to comply, a Delhi court has now directed the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader to appear before it on March 16.

This latest summons is a result of the central agency’s determination to question Mr. Kejriwal regarding the Delhi excise policy case. The ED informed the court that the Chief Minister had ignored numerous summonses issued under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

Mr. Kejriwal has chosen not to respond to eight summonses issued by the ED, alleging that the Narendra Modi government is exploiting central agencies like the ED to target opposition leaders.

The most recent summons from the agency was issued in late February, setting March 4 as the date for questioning. Dismissing the summons as “illegal,” the AAP leader expressed readiness to appear before the agency via video-conferencing. However, the ED insisted on a physical appearance, citing the absence of provisions for questioning via video-conferencing.

The ED had previously arrested two prominent AAP leaders, former Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi Manish Sisodia, and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh, in connection with the money laundering case related to Delhi’s now-abandoned excise policy.

Mr. Kejriwal’s name has been recurrently mentioned in charge sheets filed by the ED. The agency contends that the individuals implicated in the case were in communication with the Chief Minister during the formulation of the excise policy.

[internationalnewz]

Arvind Kejriwal Offers to Virtually Attend ED Summons in Delhi Excise Policy Probe

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has responded to the eighth summons from the Enforcement Directorate (ED) related to the money laundering probe concerning irregularities in the Delhi excise policy case. Despite considering the summons “illegal,” Mr. Kejriwal has expressed his willingness to answer the probe agency’s questions, proposing a date after March 12.

The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has announced that Mr. Kejriwal will participate in the hearing through video conferencing. However, the ED is firm in its stance, insisting on physically questioning the Delhi Chief Minister, citing the absence of provisions for interrogation via video conferencing.

This development follows the issuance of the eighth summons on February 27, with March 4 set as the scheduled date for Mr. Kejriwal to appear at the agency’s headquarters.

The ongoing investigation revolves around alleged irregularities in the formulation and implementation of the Delhi excise policy (2021–22). The ED is seeking Mr. Kejriwal’s statement on matters such as policy formulation and allegations of bribery.

Having skipped seven previous summonses, Mr. Kejriwal has labeled them as “illegal and politically motivated.” In a statement, the AAP has urged the ED to refrain from issuing further summonses and wait for the court’s decision.

The excise policy, intended to reform the liquor business in the national capital, promised a more modern shopping experience with discounts and offers. However, the order by Delhi Lieutenant Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena to investigate alleged irregularities led to the cancellation of the policy. The AAP accuses Mr. Saxena’s predecessor, Anil Baijal, of making last-minute changes that adversely affected the policy’s revenue expectations.

Two prominent AAP leaders, Manish Sisodia and Sanjay Singh, are already under judicial custody in connection with the case. Mr. Sisodia, the former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister, was arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on February 26 last year, while Mr. Singh, a Rajya Sabha member, was arrested by the ED on October 5.

[odnewsin]

Delhi polls: EC trends show BJP ahead in 43 seats, AAP 27; Kejriwal leads by 343 votes

New Delhi: The BJP was leading in 43 of Delhi’s 70 assembly seats while AAP was ahead in 27, according to the early trends released by the Election Commission. AAP supremo Arvind Kejriwal was leading by 343 votes from the New Delhi seat after three rounds of counting. However, Kejriwal’s former deputy Manish Sisodia was trailing by 1,314 votes in Jagpura. In Kalkaji, Chief Minister Atishi was…

[thelawadvice]

Delhi HC Issues Notice to Enforcement Directorate in AAP MP Sanjay Singh's Bail Plea

Today, the Delhi High Court took action by sending a notice to the Enforcement Directorate following a plea from Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh. Singh sought bail after his arrest in connection to a money laundering case linked to the Delhi excise policy scam.

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma announced that the next hearing for the case is scheduled for January 29.

Senior Advocate Mohit Mathur represented Singh in court and informed the proceedings that Singh had not been specifically identified in the initial offense. Mathur emphasized that Singh's arrest followed only after the tenth statement made by a witness.

Since October 4, 2023, Singh has been in the custody of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) subsequent to a search conducted at his residence by the agency. He has remained in judicial custody since October 13.

The trial rejected his bail plea on December 22, 2023.

The allegations against Singh revolve around his purported involvement in devising and executing the defunct Delhi excise policy. This policy is accused of being designed to favor specific liquor manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers, with Singh allegedly playing a significant role in its formulation and implementation.

Sanjay Singh's arrest represents the third significant apprehension of an AAP figure in connection to the excise policy case. Earlier, AAP's communications in-charge Vijay Nair was arrested in September 2022, followed by the arrest of former Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi, Manish Sisodia, in February 2023. As of now, both Nair and Sisodia remain in detention.

Earlier, Singh had filed a plea contesting his arrest, citing it as an abuse of the legal process and a breach of the Supreme Court's judgment in the Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India case, often referred to as the M3M Reality case.

However, the High Court dismissed this plea on October 20, 2023, asserting that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) holds a prominent status as an investigating agency. The court cautioned against attributing political motives to the ED, highlighting potential implications for the country's reputation.

Singh subsequently approaches the Supreme Court regarding this matter, which is currently handling and reviewing the case.