#DELHI COURT

[jasminewilson143]

Delhi Court Suspends Medha Patkar's Sentence, Grants Bail in Defamation Case Involving LG VK Saxena

Delhi Court Suspends Medha Patkar’s Sentence, Grants Bail in Defamation Case Involving LG VK Saxena A recent decision by a Delhi court has sparked significant interest in the legal and activist communities. The court suspended a five-month sentence handed down to prominent social activist Medha Patkar, granting her bail in a criminal defamation case brought against her by Delhi’s Lieutenant…

[bhaskarlive]

Land-for-job scam: Delhi court grants bail to Lalu Yadav, sons

In a major relief to Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief Lalu Prasad Yadav and his two sons, a court here on Monday granted them bail in a money laundering case linked to an alleged land-for-job scam.

As per the order of the Rouse Avenue Court, Lalu Yadav, Tejashwi Yadav and Tej Pratap Yadav are required to furnish bail bonds of Rs one lakh each.

Source: bhaskarlive.in

[courtmarriageadvocatevishal]

Delhi Court Marriage Services by Advocate Vishal | Expert Legal Assistance

Looking for reliable Delhi Court Marriage services? Advocate Vishal offers expert legal assistance for hassle-free court marriages in Delhi. Trust our experienced team for seamless and confidential marriage registration. Contact us today for a consultation.

for more information :- https://g.co/kgs/P3e8CXM

[playermagic23]

Cine1 vs T-Series legal battle over Animal: Murad Khetani to appear in Delhi Court

Bollywood Hungama has exclusively learnt that Cine1 Studios has moved to Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the OTT release of Ranbir Kapoor-starrer Animal. What we know from sources is In the ongoing legal proceedings involving  Murad Khetani and T-Series regarding the alleged concealment of an amendment to the principal agreement, Senior Counsel Mr Amit Sibal, representing T-Series, presented several compelling arguments before the Hon'ble Court.

Firstly, he contended that the current suit is premature, asserting that the 70-day period from the theatrical release on December 1, 2023, has not yet passed, making revenue statement sharing with Cine1 unnecessary at this juncture. 

Furthermore, Mr Sibal stated that over a span of four years, Cine1 failed to make timely efforts to seek information about costs, allowing the movie's release without objection. He argued that Cine1 was well aware that these expenses are being incurred in the normal course, T-Series has never denied access to financial statements and third-party agreements and has been willing to share the same. 

An industry source also said, "It is traditional trade practice that T Series is following in the case of Animal. And one also knows first the cost is covered by the P&A and OTT payment comes only after six months. Besides it has been only one and a half months since the release of the film  Also T Series is definitely to honour the commitment of  sharing profit, so why is Cine1 in a hurry.”

For the unversed, the next hearing will be held on Thursday, January 18.

[banglakhobor]

আমেরিকা যাওয়ার অনুমতি জ্যাকলিনকে, কী কী শর্ত চাপাল দিল্লি কোর্ট?

অবশেষে খানিক স্বস্তি পেলেন যেন অভিনেত্রী জ্যাকলিন ফার্নান্দেজ। তাঁকে আমেরিকার সান ফ্রান্সিসকোতে যাওয়ার অনুমতি দিল দিল্লি পাতিয়ালা হাউজ কোর্ট। শনিবার তিনি এই ছাড়পত্র পান। জ্যাকলিন তাঁর কোম্পানি শো ব্লাস্ট এলএলসির প্রচারের জন্য আমেরিকায় যাবেন। ২০০ কোটি টাকা তছরুপের মামলায় নাম জড়িয়েছে জ্যাকলিনের। অভিনেত্রী ছাড়াও এই কেসের অন্যতম অভিযুক্ত হলেন সুকেশ চন্দ্রশেখর। এতদিন এই কেসের দরুন আমেরিকায়…

[shaktiknowledgeblog]

CBI | delhi court | Manish sisodia | Manish sisodia news | new excise policy | new excise policy delhi | Tihar Jail

Manish Sisodia will remain in Tihar Jail No-1, the court has given permission to take Bhagavad Gita Delhi Excise Policy Case- Former Delhi Deputy CM Manish Sisodia has been sent to judicial custody till March 20 by the court. He will stay in jail number-1 of Tihar Jail. AAP leader and former minister Satyendar Jain are lodged in jail number 7 of Tihar. Former Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi Manish…

[thepursuitroom]

Court Pulls up Delhi Police for Negligence in Probing Retired BSF officer’s Unnatural Death

New Delhi: A Delhi court has recently pulled up the police for their negligent, unprofessional, and insensitive approach in probing a case of the unnatural death of a retired BSF officer. The Delhi Police had claimed that the case was of death due to a road accident and had filed a final accident report.

The deceased was found in injured condition near Jhandewalan Mandir on December 10, 2022.

[theprobeindia]

NLU Delhi has witnessed three student deaths in three months, with students and alumni highlighting systemic issues and seeking institutional accountability.

[vinodkaushikadvocate]

[numbdumb07]

There's a war inside me, fighting the thoughts of coming at your heart with guns blazing;

And all you do is dodge every bullet, wounding me instead.

- Anushka R.

[bhaskarlive]

Delhi court issues summons to YouTuber Dhruv Rathee in defamation suit

A Delhi court has issued summons to YouTuber Dhruv Rathee in a defamation suit filed by BJP leader Suresh Karamshi Nakhua.

Nakhua, an official spokesperson of BJP Mumbai, sought Rs 20 lakh in damages from Rathee for referring to him as a part of “violent and abusive trolls” in a video posted on YouTube.

Source: bhaskarlive.in

[oberoilawchambers]

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS BAN ON FIRECRACKERS FOR A POLLUTION-FREE DIWALI: A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE

The Supreme Court has announced that upholding the ban on the sale and use of firecrackers across the country.

The Supreme Court has announced that upholding the ban on the sale and use of firecrackers across the country has far-reaching implications, not only for public health and environmental protection but also for legal precedent and the interpretation of fundamental rights. The court’s ruling, which was first imposed in 2018, has been challenged by several petitioners, but the court has reaffirmed its position, citing the well-documented health and environmental hazards associated with fireworks. The court emphasized that the right to celebrate Diwali does not supersede the fundamental right to clean air and a healthy environment.

LEGAL STATUS QUO

It must be noted that bursting crackers lead to a violation of Fundamental rights along with the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; and The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000. regulations. The decision has significant legal implications, not only for the regulation of firecrackers but also for the interpretation of fundamental rights and the application of environmental protection laws. The court’s ruling sets a strong precedent for future cases involving conflicts between individual rights and environmental protection.

The decision also highlights the importance of scientific evidence in informing legal decisions. The court’s reliance on scientific studies on the health and environmental impacts of firecrackers demonstrates the importance of evidence-based policymaking.

Moreover, the court’s decision has far-reaching implications for environmental jurisprudence in India. The court’s recognition of the right to a clean environment as a fundamental right and its emphasis on the precautionary principle and polluter pays principle have strengthened the legal framework for environmental protection in the country.

The Supreme Court’s decision is a major victory for public health and environmental protection. Firecrackers are a major source of air pollution, particularly in urban areas. They release harmful pollutants such as particulate matter and sulfur dioxide, which can cause respiratory problems, heart disease, and other health problems.

In addition, firecrackers can cause noise pollution, which can disrupt sleep, increase stress levels, and even cause hearing loss. The Supreme Court’s decision will help to reduce air and noise pollution and improve the overall quality of life for millions of Indians.

CASE LAWS SUPPORTING THE BAN

The Supreme Court’s decision is grounded in a strong foundation of case law that has established the importance of environmental protection and the fundamental right to clean air. Key case laws supporting the ban include:

Arjun Gopal vs. Union of India (2018): In this landmark case, the Supreme Court recognized the right to a clean environment as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The court also emphasized the precautionary principle, which states that even in the absence of scientific certainty, if there is a risk of serious or irreversible harm to the environment, precautionary measures must be taken.

M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India (1987): This case established the principle of polluter pays, which holds that the polluter must bear the cost of pollution. The principle has been applied to various industries, including the firecracker industry.

Vellore Citizens Forum vs. Union of India (2011): In this case, the Supreme Court recognized the right to a healthy environment as a part of the right to life under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The court also emphasized the need for environmental impact assessments to prevent pollution.

BALANCING THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL

The Supreme Court’s decision is also a significant development in the interpretation of fundamental rights. The court recognised that the right to celebrate Diwali is a fundamental right, but it is not absolute. The court held that the right to celebrate Diwali must be exercised in a manner that does not infringe upon the fundamental right to clean air and a healthy environment.

This decision is a reminder that all rights must be exercised in a responsible manner. The right to celebrate Diwali does not give individuals the right to harm the environment or the health of others. The Supreme Court’s decision is expected to have a significant impact on future cases involving conflicts between individual rights and environmental protection. The court’s ruling sets a strong precedent for future cases and will likely be cited in many future legal challenges.

The decision is also a reminder that the courts have a crucial role in protecting the environment. The courts can use their power to enforce environmental laws and regulations and to hold individuals and businesses accountable for their actions.

CONCLUSION

The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the ban on firecrackers is a landmark ruling that prioritizes public health and environmental protection while upholding fundamental rights. The decision is a testament to the court’s commitment to upholding the Constitution and ensuring the well-being of all citizens.

By upholding the ban, the court has sent a clear message that public health and environmental protection are paramount. The decision is expected to have a significant impact on air quality during Diwali, particularly in urban areas, and contribute to a healthier environment for all.

Tammana Bahl Oberoi Law Chambers Contact Us

[aone-marriage]

Love is a beautiful thing and marriage is even more special. That’s why at AOneMarriage, we want to help you make the most of your love story. We provide everything you need to make your commitment to each other even more meaningful.

Get access to all types of marriages like COURT MARRIAGE, NRI MARRIAGE, LOVE MARRIAGE and more!

Service Locations -Delhi, Noida, GreaterNoida, Faridabad, Ghaziabad,  Gurgaon, Meerut and all NCR.

You can contact us at aonemarriage.com to get your queries solved We are available on the following numbers: Phone: +91-98119-90284 Website: aonemarriage.com

[rightnewshindi]

उम्र कैद की सजा काट रहे 104 वर्षीय शख्स को सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने दी जमानत, जानें क्या बोली चीफ जस्टिस की बेंच

Supreme Court News: हत्या के दोषी 104 साल के बुजुर्ग शख्स को सुप्रीम कोर्ट से बड़ी राहत मिली है। चीफ जस्टिस ऑफ इंडिया संजीव खन्ना की अगुवाई वाली बेंच ने उन्हें अंतरिम जमानत दे दी। पश्चिम बंगाल के मालदा जिले में साल 1920 में जन्म लेने वाले रसिक चंद्र मंडल 1988 में की गई एक हत्या के लिए उम्रकैद की सजा काट रहे हैं। मीडिया रिपोर्ट्स के मुताबिक, चीफ जस्टिस ऑफ इंडिया संजीव खन्ना और जस्टिस संजय कुमार…

[criminal-lawyer-in-delhi]

Accused of a Crime in Delhi? Why Choose Sidhant Dhingra for Your Legal Defense?

When dealing with criminal charges, having the right legal representation is crucial. Sidhant Dhingra & Associates is a renowned Criminal law firm in Delhi, known for its unparalleled expertise, client-focused approach, and exceptional track record in handling complex and high-stakes cases. With years of experience across various facets of Criminal law , the firm has established itself as a trusted name in the legal community.

Why Choose Sidhant Dhingra & Associates?

1. Extensive Practice in Criminal Law

Sidhant Dhingra & Associates boasts years of hands-on experience in handling a wide array of criminal cases, ranging from white-collar crimes to heinous offenses. The firm has successfully represented clients in cases involving:

Economic offenses (fraud, embezzlement, money laundering).

Cybercrimes (hacking, data theft, online defamation).

Narcotics and drugs-related offenses.

Sexual harassment, assault, and POCSO cases.

Bail applications and anticipatory bail.

Trials under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Defamation and criminal conspiracy.

Bail and Anticipatory Bail

2. High-Profile Case Experience

The firm has a proven history of managing high-profile cases, providing discreet and professional legal representation. Their ability to navigate media scrutiny and complex legal frameworks has earned them the trust of business leaders, public figures, and individuals facing challenging legal battles.

3. Strategic Approach and Expertise

Every case handled by Sidhant Dhingra & Associates is meticulously analyzed to develop a customized legal strategy. Their deep understanding of procedural and substantive criminal laws, combined with a proactive approach, ensures the best possible outcomes for their clients.

3. Robust Courtroom Advocacy

The firm’s team of seasoned advocates, led by Sidhant Dhingra, is known for its persuasive arguments, thorough cross-examinations, and ability to handle even the most challenging cases with confidence.

Key Practice Areas

1. Pre-Litigation Advisory

Early legal advice can make a significant difference in criminal cases. Sidhant Dhingra & Associates offers pre-litigation consultations to help clients understand their legal options, assess risks, and decide the best course of action.

2. Bail and Anticipatory Bail

The firm has a strong track record of securing bail and anticipatory bail for clients across various criminal charges. Their expertise in navigating procedural hurdles ensures swift and effective relief.

3. Trial Representation

Representing clients in trial courts is a cornerstone of the firm’s practice. From gathering evidence to cross-examining witnesses, their trial advocacy is thorough, strategic, and aimed at achieving acquittals or favorable judgments.

4. Appeals and Revisions

The team has significant experience in representing clients in appellate courts, including the High Court and Supreme Court. Their ability to identify errors in lower court proceedings and craft compelling appeals ensures strong representation at every judicial level.

5. Specialized Criminal Cases

Economic Offenses: Expertise in representing individuals and corporations in cases of financial fraud, forgery, and embezzlement.

Cybercrime Cases: Tackling the nuances of rapidly evolving cyber laws to defend clients accused of hacking, phishing, or data breaches.

Domestic Violence and Sexual Offenses: Skilled representation in sensitive cases involving allegations under IPC and POCSO.

The Approach of Sidhant Dhingra & Associates

1. Meticulous Case Preparation

The firm believes in leaving no stone unturned. Their team conducts detailed investigations, engages expert witnesses, and prepares airtight defenses based on facts, evidence, and legal precedents.

2. Client-Centric Focus

Understanding the stress that criminal charges can cause, the firm emphasizes clear communication and transparency. Clients are kept informed at every stage of their case and provided with practical advice tailored to their unique circumstances.

3. Commitment to Ethical Advocacy

Integrity and professionalism are at the core of Sidhant Dhingra & Associates. They are committed to upholding the principles of justice while zealously advocating for their clients’ rights.

4. Leveraging Legal Technology

Staying ahead in a digital world, the firm incorporates cutting-edge legal research tools and technology to strengthen their cases and provide innovative solutions to complex legal problems.

Criminal Law in Delhi: The Importance of Expert Representation

Delhi, being the legal hub of India, witnesses a high volume of criminal cases. The city’s courts are known for their intricate legal processes and fast-paced proceedings. Navigating these complexities requires the expertise of a seasoned criminal lawyer. Sidhant Dhingra & Associates is well-versed in the local legal environment, including the practices of district courts, the Delhi High Court, and the Supreme Court.

The firm’s deep understanding of procedural requirements, from filing FIRs to arguing in court, ensures that clients receive efficient and effective representation.

Client Testimonials

“Sidhant Dhingra & Associates turned the tide in my favor when I thought all hope was lost. Their team’s dedication and strategic approach helped me secure an acquittal in a complex fraud case.”

“I was facing serious charges and didn’t know where to turn. The professionalism and expertise of Sidhant Dhingra & Associates gave me the confidence I needed. They fought for me like no one else could.”

Contact Sidhant Dhingra & Associates

Facing criminal charges is one of the most daunting experiences a person can endure. With Sidhant Dhingra & Associates on your side, you gain a team of highly skilled advocates committed to safeguarding your rights and providing unparalleled legal support.

Get in touch today to schedule a consultation and take the first step toward resolving your legal concerns with one of Delhi’s most trusted criminal law firms.