#DELHI COURT

[advocate-0hanit]

Delhi Court Marriage Services | Quick & Hassle-Free Legal Assistance

Looking for Delhi Court Marriage services? Get quick and hassle-free legal assistance for court marriages, document preparation, and registration. Expert guidance for inter-caste and inter-religion marriages. Contact us today!

FOR MORE INFORMATION :- https://g.co/kgs/1oDfYb9

[jasminewilson143]

Delhi Court Suspends Medha Patkar's Sentence, Grants Bail in Defamation Case Involving LG VK Saxena

Delhi Court Suspends Medha Patkar’s Sentence, Grants Bail in Defamation Case Involving LG VK Saxena A recent decision by a Delhi court has sparked significant interest in the legal and activist communities. The court suspended a five-month sentence handed down to prominent social activist Medha Patkar, granting her bail in a criminal defamation case brought against her by Delhi’s Lieutenant…

[bhaskarlive]

Land-for-job scam: Delhi court grants bail to Lalu Yadav, sons

In a major relief to Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief Lalu Prasad Yadav and his two sons, a court here on Monday granted them bail in a money laundering case linked to an alleged land-for-job scam.

As per the order of the Rouse Avenue Court, Lalu Yadav, Tejashwi Yadav and Tej Pratap Yadav are required to furnish bail bonds of Rs one lakh each.

Source: bhaskarlive.in

[courtmarriageadvocatevishal]

Delhi Court Marriage Services by Advocate Vishal | Expert Legal Assistance

Looking for reliable Delhi Court Marriage services? Advocate Vishal offers expert legal assistance for hassle-free court marriages in Delhi. Trust our experienced team for seamless and confidential marriage registration. Contact us today for a consultation.

for more information :- https://g.co/kgs/P3e8CXM

[banglakhobor]

আমেরিকা যাওয়ার অনুমতি জ্যাকলিনকে, কী কী শর্ত চাপাল দিল্লি কোর্ট?

অবশেষে খানিক স্বস্তি পেলেন যেন অভিনেত্রী জ্যাকলিন ফার্নান্দেজ। তাঁকে আমেরিকার সান ফ্রান্সিসকোতে যাওয়ার অনুমতি দিল দিল্লি পাতিয়ালা হাউজ কোর্ট। শনিবার তিনি এই ছাড়পত্র পান। জ্যাকলিন তাঁর কোম্পানি শো ব্লাস্ট এলএলসির প্রচারের জন্য আমেরিকায় যাবেন। ২০০ কোটি টাকা তছরুপের মামলায় নাম জড়িয়েছে জ্যাকলিনের। অভিনেত্রী ছাড়াও এই কেসের অন্যতম অভিযুক্ত হলেন সুকেশ চন্দ্রশেখর। এতদিন এই কেসের দরুন আমেরিকায়…

[shaktiknowledgeblog]

CBI | delhi court | Manish sisodia | Manish sisodia news | new excise policy | new excise policy delhi | Tihar Jail

Manish Sisodia will remain in Tihar Jail No-1, the court has given permission to take Bhagavad Gita Delhi Excise Policy Case- Former Delhi Deputy CM Manish Sisodia has been sent to judicial custody till March 20 by the court. He will stay in jail number-1 of Tihar Jail. AAP leader and former minister Satyendar Jain are lodged in jail number 7 of Tihar. Former Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi Manish…

[thepursuitroom]

Court Pulls up Delhi Police for Negligence in Probing Retired BSF officer’s Unnatural Death

New Delhi: A Delhi court has recently pulled up the police for their negligent, unprofessional, and insensitive approach in probing a case of the unnatural death of a retired BSF officer. The Delhi Police had claimed that the case was of death due to a road accident and had filed a final accident report.

The deceased was found in injured condition near Jhandewalan Mandir on December 10, 2022.

[megayogiposts]

Hearing Notice for CIC Second Appeal - Punjab National Bank

Hearing NoticeCentral Information CommissionBaba Gang Nath MargMunirka, New Delhi – 110067011-26180514http://dsscic.nic.in/online-link-paper-compliance/addFile No. CIC/PNBNK/A/2023/651218DATE : 22-11-2024NOTICE OF HEARING FOR SECOND APPEAL/COMPLAINTAppellant(s)/Complainant(s):Respondent(s):Yogi M P SinghCPIO :1. The CPIO,Punjab National Bank, PNBHouse, Circle Office,Yamunapuram, Near RTO…

[theprobeindia]

NLU Delhi has witnessed three student deaths in three months, with students and alumni highlighting systemic issues and seeking institutional accountability.

[vinodkaushikadvocate]

[bhaskarlive]

Delhi court issues summons to YouTuber Dhruv Rathee in defamation suit

A Delhi court has issued summons to YouTuber Dhruv Rathee in a defamation suit filed by BJP leader Suresh Karamshi Nakhua.

Nakhua, an official spokesperson of BJP Mumbai, sought Rs 20 lakh in damages from Rathee for referring to him as a part of “violent and abusive trolls” in a video posted on YouTube.

Source: bhaskarlive.in

[numbdumb07]

There's a war inside me, fighting the thoughts of coming at your heart with guns blazing;

And all you do is dodge every bullet, wounding me instead.

- Anushka R.

[oberoilawchambers]

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS BAN ON FIRECRACKERS FOR A POLLUTION-FREE DIWALI: A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE

The Supreme Court has announced that upholding the ban on the sale and use of firecrackers across the country.

The Supreme Court has announced that upholding the ban on the sale and use of firecrackers across the country has far-reaching implications, not only for public health and environmental protection but also for legal precedent and the interpretation of fundamental rights. The court’s ruling, which was first imposed in 2018, has been challenged by several petitioners, but the court has reaffirmed its position, citing the well-documented health and environmental hazards associated with fireworks. The court emphasized that the right to celebrate Diwali does not supersede the fundamental right to clean air and a healthy environment.

LEGAL STATUS QUO

It must be noted that bursting crackers lead to a violation of Fundamental rights along with the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; and The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000. regulations. The decision has significant legal implications, not only for the regulation of firecrackers but also for the interpretation of fundamental rights and the application of environmental protection laws. The court’s ruling sets a strong precedent for future cases involving conflicts between individual rights and environmental protection.

The decision also highlights the importance of scientific evidence in informing legal decisions. The court’s reliance on scientific studies on the health and environmental impacts of firecrackers demonstrates the importance of evidence-based policymaking.

Moreover, the court’s decision has far-reaching implications for environmental jurisprudence in India. The court’s recognition of the right to a clean environment as a fundamental right and its emphasis on the precautionary principle and polluter pays principle have strengthened the legal framework for environmental protection in the country.

The Supreme Court’s decision is a major victory for public health and environmental protection. Firecrackers are a major source of air pollution, particularly in urban areas. They release harmful pollutants such as particulate matter and sulfur dioxide, which can cause respiratory problems, heart disease, and other health problems.

In addition, firecrackers can cause noise pollution, which can disrupt sleep, increase stress levels, and even cause hearing loss. The Supreme Court’s decision will help to reduce air and noise pollution and improve the overall quality of life for millions of Indians.

CASE LAWS SUPPORTING THE BAN

The Supreme Court’s decision is grounded in a strong foundation of case law that has established the importance of environmental protection and the fundamental right to clean air. Key case laws supporting the ban include:

Arjun Gopal vs. Union of India (2018): In this landmark case, the Supreme Court recognized the right to a clean environment as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The court also emphasized the precautionary principle, which states that even in the absence of scientific certainty, if there is a risk of serious or irreversible harm to the environment, precautionary measures must be taken.

M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India (1987): This case established the principle of polluter pays, which holds that the polluter must bear the cost of pollution. The principle has been applied to various industries, including the firecracker industry.

Vellore Citizens Forum vs. Union of India (2011): In this case, the Supreme Court recognized the right to a healthy environment as a part of the right to life under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The court also emphasized the need for environmental impact assessments to prevent pollution.

BALANCING THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL

The Supreme Court’s decision is also a significant development in the interpretation of fundamental rights. The court recognised that the right to celebrate Diwali is a fundamental right, but it is not absolute. The court held that the right to celebrate Diwali must be exercised in a manner that does not infringe upon the fundamental right to clean air and a healthy environment.

This decision is a reminder that all rights must be exercised in a responsible manner. The right to celebrate Diwali does not give individuals the right to harm the environment or the health of others. The Supreme Court’s decision is expected to have a significant impact on future cases involving conflicts between individual rights and environmental protection. The court’s ruling sets a strong precedent for future cases and will likely be cited in many future legal challenges.

The decision is also a reminder that the courts have a crucial role in protecting the environment. The courts can use their power to enforce environmental laws and regulations and to hold individuals and businesses accountable for their actions.

CONCLUSION

The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the ban on firecrackers is a landmark ruling that prioritizes public health and environmental protection while upholding fundamental rights. The decision is a testament to the court’s commitment to upholding the Constitution and ensuring the well-being of all citizens.

By upholding the ban, the court has sent a clear message that public health and environmental protection are paramount. The decision is expected to have a significant impact on air quality during Diwali, particularly in urban areas, and contribute to a healthier environment for all.

Tammana Bahl Oberoi Law Chambers Contact Us