#Consumer Products And Services

[okitanoniisan]

no one can reach my level of petty hating about the stupid english title

[coochiequeens]

Update on a story I already posted about

By Anna Slatz February 5, 2024

The family at the center of a custody battle with Montana Child and Family Services over their 14-year-old “transgender” daughter is reportedly facing imminent arrest after speaking to media about their ordeal. Krista and Todd Kolstad had previously been ordered by a judge to remain silent on the case, but chose to speak out about their situation last week.

Reduxx was first to break the story after speaking to the Kolstads about their tragic situation on January 29. In the interview, the Kolstads revealed that their 14-year-old daughter, Jennifer*, had been removed from their custody after they declined to actively “affirm” her newfound gender identity. Montana Child and Family Services (CFS) argued to a court that it was in the child’s “therapeutic best interest” to have her gender identity “respected,” and a petition was presented for the child to be sent to a family member in Canada.

Stepmom Krista and “Jennifer” Kolstad. Photo Source: Provided.

The removal was the culmination of a months-long battle between the Kolstads and CFS which started on August 18, 2023, after Jennifer claimed to a friend that she was suicidal and suffering from terminal cancer. The friend reported the claims to police, who reached out to the Kolstads to confirm that Jennifer was alright.

Later on that evening, a CFS case worker arrived at the Kolstad home for an inspection and private interview with Jennifer, at which point the child declared she had drank toilet bowl cleaner and overdosed on pain medication.

Though she showed no symptoms of illness and had no access to either substances, Jennifer was taken to the hospital on an emergency basis for bloodwork, which conclusively determined she had fabricated her claim of overdosing. She also does not have a medical history of cancer despite having claimed to her friend that she was terminal.

The Kolstads attempted to inform CFS that Jennifer had a tendency of attention-seeking behavior and fabricating wild claims, but throughout the incident, Jennifer’s “gender identity” was the main point of contention. The child told CFS she identified as a “boy” named Leo, and that her parents were abusive and not willing to facilitate her gender transition.

Jennifer spent two days in the hospital for suicide monitoring, at which point the Kolstads agreed with CFS that she would benefit from being sent to a residential treatment facility for counseling. While there were a number of Montana-based facilities floated as options, the possibility of Jennifer being sent to Wyoming was also mentioned as an unlikely alternative.

The Kolstad family. Photo Source: Provided.

On August 22, the Kolstads were told that Jennifer was next in line for a bed in Billings. But, later on that same day, they received a call from the hospital informing them that she was instead being sent to an unnamed facility in Wyoming. Faced with a number of unanswered questions and a concern about Wyoming’s laws allowing children to transition, the Kolstads expressed a hesitancy to allow Jennifer to be sent across state lines.

Within 10 minutes of refusing to immediately sign paperwork releasing Jennifer to the facility, Montana Child and Family Services arrived at the Kolstad residence with police and served them with paperwork temporarily removing Jennifer from their custody.

Jennifer was eventually returned to Montana to enter a youth group home for additional counseling, but the Kolstad’s fight with CFS had only just begun.

Though initially told that Jennifer would be returned to their care after her time at the group home was finished, CFS petitioned the court to remove Jennifer from their custody completely and have her sent to her long-estranged biological mother in Canada.

“We were told that letting Jennifer transition and live as a boy was in her ‘therapeutic best interest’ and because we aren’t willing to follow that recommendation, the court gave CFS custody of Jennifer for six months,” Krista told Reduxx. “CFS is now going to place Jennifer in the care of her birth mother in Canada, who has never really been a part of her life. The judge said to us ‘you need to expect that reunification with your family may not be what you are expecting.’”

In response to the decision, the Kolstads released a video on social media pleading for help. The court demanded they remove it and issued a gag order restricting the Kolstads from speaking further on the case.

They voluntarily defied the order, re-uploaded the video, and spoke to press regardless out of concern over what was happening to their family. While a contempt of court hearing was set for January 29, the Kolstads had to file for a continuance in order to leave the state and attend to a severely ill family member in Ohio.

But the already-mind boggling story has only continued to grow in complexity after the Governor of Montana, Greg Gianforte, released a statement on X (formerly Twitter) siding with the decision of the state’s Child and Family Services.

While not directly accusing the Kolstads of abuse, Gianforte suggested that Jennifer was removed from the household for legitimate reasons.

While the CFS affidavit does extensively detail the child’s complaints of abuse for not being “affirmed” in her desire to live as a “boy,” the argument made by CFS that resulted in her being removed from her parent’s care was their hesitancy to immediately sign paperwork sending her to Wyoming.

Both the CFS affidavit and the accompanying report neglect to acknowledge that Jennifer had lied about having terminal cancer, drinking Clorox toilet cleaner, or overdosing on prescription medication — all statements that would lend weight to the parent’s initial warnings that Jennifer had a history of attention-seeking behavior.

The Montana Safety Assessment completed by CFS.

Previous accusations of household instability detailed in the CFS report from 2016 and 2017, both of which involved Todd’s ex-wife, were noted “unsubstantiated,” and there has never been any history of Todd nor Krista physically harming or otherwise neglecting any of their children’s care.

But despite the clear indications that the “abuse” in the Kolstad residence was limited to not affirming Jennifer’s “gender identity” and expressing a hesitancy to sign paperwork allowing Jennifer to go to Wyoming, a push to paint the Kolstad’s as legitimately abusive has begun in an apparent effort to justify CFS’s actions. Disturbingly, many of those pushes appear to originate directly from the Governor’s office.

Travis Hall, Governor Gianforte’s senior advisor, has shared two posts to his social media account in which it is implied that the Kolstads were severely abusing Jennifer.

In one post shared by Hall, a user claims that even children living in “absolute filth, meth labs, with both parents being dealers and addicts” were not taken away from their parents in the way Jennifer was, implying what was happening in the household was far worse.

Another post shared by Hall features a link to an article from TownHall reporter Stephen Brown which appears to have been created with the input of the Governor’s office. In the article, Brown refers to Jennifer with “they/them” pronouns, and runs defense for Gianforte’s suggestion that the Kolstads were abusing Jennifer and that CFS acted appropriately.

On X, an individual claiming to be a lawyer who works to “protect trans kids” in Montana has been spreading the false accusation that Todd Kolstad, Jennifer’s father, was “convicted” of domestic abuse. In actuality, documents reviewed by Reduxx demonstrate the charges, which were unrelated to Jennifer, were dropped in 2021. The Kolstads are currently engaged in a lawsuit against the Glasgow Police Department for their alleged mismanagement of that case, and the officer at the center of the suit is also being pursued by other Glasgow residents for similar acts of misconduct.

But while the Kolstads have experienced an outpouring of support on an international level after taking their story public, Governor Gianforte appears to be doubling down once again.

This time, the Kolstads have been made aware through their lawyer that they may be arrested when they return to Montana from Ohio where they are still caring for a sick relative.

“We were very concerned, but not surprised, to learn from a credible source that the Governor of Montana plans to arrest us the moment we step foot back in Montana. We are also told that he has tasked his senior adviser and director of strategic communications to use the media to punish us for speaking out about the state’s medical kidnapping of our daughter,” Krista Kolstad said to Reduxx in an exclusive statement.

“It was an abuse of power for the state to revoke custody of our daughter because we wouldn’t affirm her ‘gender identity.’ It is an abuse of power to use tax-dollars to smear us as negligent in the press despite records that prove we have always proactively sought care for our daughter’s ongoing, unrelated mental health issues. We have also followed medical recommendations pertaining to these issues since she has been in state custody. The only thing we ever objected to is ‘transitioning’ our daughter.”

Krista continued: “Any accusation that she was taken from our home due to abuse or neglect secondary to this issue is a bald-faced lie with political foundations. Our daughter is not a political pawn. She is a child and she should be with her family – not the state. We are never going to stop fighting for our daughter.”

Since receiving the news of their possible arrest, the Kolstads have no plan to return to Montana at this time.

Mattie Watkins, the family’s media representative reiterated Krista’s sentiments, and slammed Gianforte’s office for participating in the “smear” campaign against the Kolstads.

“We anticipated Governor Gianforte’s next move would be to smear US Air Force veteran, Todd Kolstad and his wife, Krista, as abusive parents. It’s clear that his top priority is his political reputation – not the child at the center of this increasingly political fight,” Watkins said.

“Surely to defame parents as abusive, to take away their child, requires some standard of evidence. If not, where does this stop? Which family, in which state, is next? In my opinion, Gianforte is giving state agents a manual on how to sever the parent-child relationship and bypass all levels of law and government in order to put any minor they like on the affirmation to lifelong medicalization pipeline. Our children are not safe in government care.”

*The child’s name has been changed at the request of her parents.

[girl4music]

I thoroughly believe that the main 2 issues plaguing the TV art/entertainment industry today are representation anxiety and cancellation anxiety.

Representation anxiety is the reason why the quality of the storytelling is suffering.

Cancellation anxiety is the reason why the quality of the production is suffering.

ANXIETY is what is ruining TV show storytelling and producing in general. If people were less anxious about the way the story in a show should or has to go, there would be more focus on what actually matters.

There are so many storytelling and production issues in a show because people are not focussing on the overall experience when creating/watching a TV show. Showrunners/creators are not focussing on it because they’re too anxious about providing the “correct” or “best” or “most palatable” representation because if they don’t provide it, their show will just get cancelled.

Honestly imagine the extreme anxiety a showrunner/creator would feel in this day and age of showmaking.

It is a never-ending loop for them of “I must provide the representation that appeases both the audience and the network alike” and then “if I don’t do this as soon as possible, my show will be cancelled and everybody that depends on me will lose their jobs”.

Show disappoints the network, gets cancelled - which in turn disappoints the audience, stops them from watching anything else like it in case it happens to them again - which then makes the network misjudge it as “this kind of content must not be engaging enough for consumers to invest themselves in” but they throw it out for consumption anyway because quantity over quality even though they’re ultimately going to axe it regardless because “it doesn’t sell.”

And then the whole thing happens all over again. 😩

Sounds to me like they should just have better communication with the showrunners/creators and more faith and trust in what they’re able to deliver.

And maybe once in a while CONSULT THE AUDIENCE themselves. Make them apart of the conversation more than with just the standard lazy feedback questionnaires. I’m pretty fucking sure were a BIG WIG network executive to actually take the time out of their oh so busy work week to talk to us about what it is we want and what we don’t - things would be better for all sides. For the networks, the showrunners/creators+team, and for the customers/consumers.

At the end of the day the people I really feel sorry for regarding this is not us. It’s the showrunners/creators.

I feel so sorry for the producers, writers and directors because I know they’re all running rings around themselves trying to please every fucking body and every complaint from either side goes right to them.

They’re the mimimim wage staff at your favourite restaurant where customers and employers alike yell at them over something they’re personally pissed about but they can’t do anything about it other than offer their sympathies and provide other alternatives.

You think we have it rough as the viewers.

The network thinks they have it rough.

No.

Who has it rough are the showrunners/creators.

[researchers-me]

Customer Satisfaction Survey | Consumer Insights Research in UAE

Want to conduct Customer Satisfaction Surveys or consumer insights research? Boost your customer experience, happiness & loyalty with Researchers in Dubai, Abu Dhabi.

[asalescommunity]

If CBA from a city of Warsaw was led by a government from the city of Warsaw to do a theft from a private sector, and from a public sector in a country where A Council does function in a correct manner, the government can be fined.

CBA can be proven to represent an interest of a criminal gang.

An author Piotr Sienkiewicz

+48 721 951 799

[cuprohastes]

About ten, fifteen years ago I wrote a story about a guy living in a Capitalist dystopia. His walls, furniture, and tableware are all covered in smart displays. Basically animated wallpaper. It's sold as being able to turn your room or objects into anything - A nice forest view, outer space, a fantasy realm... but the companies that run this stuff keep sneaking ads in.

It gets so bad he's always being woken up by adverts that offer insomnia cures and better bedding that play when he tries to sleep.

So he buys the ad-free tier, and it's great... for a few months. And then he starts getting adverts from 'premium partners'. So he goes up a level... and the same thing happens.

So he jailbreaks his wallpaper and sends all the ad servers to 0.0.0.0 and voila... he can sleep.

Until this SWAT team blows his door off and drag him off to jail. The Ad companies are suing him for loss of revenue for the products he' notionally have bought if he'd watched their adverts, based on some weird 'The average consumer buys X products with an average value of Y' calculation.

The judge is like 'well I dun wanna annoy the sponsors' so he RICO's this guy's house and possessions and sends him to jail.

... which is a nice relaxed non-volent offender jail for the corporately disenfranchised. But because these people have no money... there's no ads and now he's happy because the only place he's free... is in prison.

Which at the time was a bit much and now it's like: Called it.

Elon's suing companies for not advertising because he's losing revenue. He's also cranking the price of Ad Free Twitter. Disney and Amazon play adverts on their paid service when services used to be free because of the adverts... and now you have to pay to watch the adverts or go up a couple of tiers.

And google's going around freaking out about ad-blockers.

The original story was lost. However, I have started re-writing it. The first part is here - If there's enough interest, I'll keep going.

[gatbrozambia]

Top Distributing Companies in Lusaka Zambia | Largest FMCG Network

Distributing companies in Lusaka Zambia are at the heart of the country’s fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) industry, ensuring that essential products reach every corner of the nation. These companies form a vital link between manufacturers and retailers, especially in high-demand sectors like food, beverages, and hygiene products.

As the demand for reliable supply chains grows, the largest FMCG with a great distribution network in Zambia stands out for its ability to move goods efficiently and consistently. These leaders in logistics have streamlined delivery systems, strategic warehouse locations, and strong relationships with both local and international brands.

When it comes to choosing FMCG distributors in Zambia, businesses prioritize those with proven track records in dependability, product variety, and nationwide reach. From small shops to large supermarket chains, retailers rely on these distributors to maintain stock and support consumer needs.

The role of product distribution services in Zambia goes beyond transportation — it’s about providing end-to-end solutions that include inventory management, market coverage, and responsive customer service. With top-tier distributing companies leading the way, Zambia’s FMCG sector continues to thrive.

[fbiinspectiontechnology]

🏭 Product Inspection services to guarantee top-quality and defect-free goods. Our experts perform thorough checks at every stage, ensuring compliance with industry standards. Avoid risks and ensure smooth transactions with professional product inspection. Contact us today! ✅🔍

Visit our site : https://www.fbi-its.com/collections/product-inspection-service

[mhorkya]

Mhorkya – Your Best Virtual Service Provider in India

[gfixes]

Garage Door Installers in Pittsburgh, PA: Your Guide to Quality Installation Services

When it comes to home improvements, a new garage door can be one of the most impactful upgrades you can make. It not only enhances your home’s curb appeal but also boosts its functionality and security. If you're looking for a professional and reliable garage door installer in Pittsburgh, PA, you have plenty of options. However, selecting the right garage door installer can make a big difference in the quality of your installation and the long-term performance of your door.

In this article, we’ll guide you through the process of choosing the best garage door installer in Pittsburgh, PA, and explain what you can expect during the installation process. From selecting the right installer to understanding the installation procedure, we have you covered.

Why You Need Professional Garage Door Installers

Installing a new garage door is a significant investment, and ensuring that it’s done correctly is crucial for the safety, convenience, and security of your home. Here are some reasons why hiring a professional garage door installer is important:

Expertise and Experience: Garage doors are complex systems that require specialized knowledge and experience to install. From ensuring proper alignment to selecting the correct hardware, professional installers know the ins and outs of the process.

Proper Safety Measures: Garage doors are heavy and can be dangerous to handle without the right equipment and training. Professional installers have the tools and expertise to handle the job safely, preventing accidents and injuries.

Longevity and Performance: A poorly installed garage door can wear out quickly, leading to costly repairs and even potential security issues. Professional installation ensures that your door operates smoothly for years, minimizing the need for frequent repairs.

Time-Saving: Installation of a garage door can be time-consuming, especially if you lack experience. Hiring a professional installer ensures that the job is completed efficiently, saving you time and hassle.

Warranty Protection: Many garage door manufacturers offer warranties for products that are professionally installed. If you attempt a DIY installation, you may void the warranty, so professional installation is always the safest option.

Choosing the Right Garage Door Installer in Pittsburgh, PA

There are several garage door installers near me, each offering a range of services. To ensure you choose the best one for your needs, consider the following factors:

1. Experience and Reputation

Experience matters when it comes to garage door installation. A company with years of experience will have a proven track record of handling different types of doors and installations. Reputation is equally important. Look for companies with positive reviews and testimonials from previous customers. You can check online reviews, ask for references, or get recommendations from friends and neighbors who have had recent garage door installations.

2. Range of Services Offered

Garage door installers typically offer more than just installations. Many also provide repair and maintenance services. If you’re considering getting your door serviced in the future, it’s a good idea to choose a company that offers comprehensive services. Some common services to look for include:

Garage door repair (broken springs, faulty openers, etc.)

Garage door maintenance (tuning, lubricating, etc.)

Emergency repair services

Custom garage door design and installation

3. Licensing and Insurance

It’s important to choose a garage door installer who is licensed and insured. A licensed company ensures that they follow local building codes and regulations, while insurance protects you in case of accidents or property damage during the installation process. Always ask about licensing and insurance before hiring an installer.

4. Quality of Products

A good installer will use high-quality garage doors and parts from reputable manufacturers. Ask the installer about the materials and brands they work with to ensure that your new door is durable, secure, and energy-efficient. Whether you’re looking for a steel, wood, or custom door, quality products will ensure long-lasting performance.

5. Transparent Pricing

It’s essential to choose a garage door installer who offers transparent pricing with no hidden fees. The cost of a new garage door installation can vary depending on factors such as the type of door, materials, and labor. A good installer will provide a detailed estimate upfront and explain the cost breakdown so that you can make an informed decision.

6. Customer Service

When hiring a garage door installer, choose a company that values customer service. A reliable installer will communicate clearly, respond to inquiries promptly, and keep you updated throughout the installation process. Look for a company that offers a satisfaction guarantee, so you know they stand behind their work.

What to Expect During the Garage Door Installation Process

The process of installing a new garage door typically involves several steps. Here’s a general overview of what to expect during the installation process:

1. Consultation and Measurement

The first step in the installation process is usually a consultation where the installer assesses your needs and preferences. They will take accurate measurements of your garage opening to ensure a perfect fit. If you need help choosing a style or material, the installer can offer advice based on your budget and preferences.

2. Selection of the Door

Based on your consultation, the installer will help you choose the best garage door for your home. This may include selecting the material (steel, wood, aluminum, etc.), style (carriage house, contemporary, traditional), and color. They will also discuss additional features, such as insulation, windows, and custom designs.

3. Removal of the Old Door (if applicable)

If you’re replacing an existing door, the installer will remove the old door and its components. This includes detaching the old door from the opener and removing any old hardware. The installer will also dispose of the old door in an environmentally responsible manner.

4. Installation of the New Door

Once the old door is removed, the new door is carefully installed. This step involves assembling the door panels, installing the tracks, springs, and hardware, and ensuring everything is properly aligned. The installer will take extra care to ensure the door is balanced and functions smoothly.

5. Installation of the Opener (if applicable)

If you're also installing a new garage door opener, the installer will mount the opener unit, attach the door to the opener, and ensure proper operation. Modern openers come with additional features, such as smart technology, remote access, and battery backup, so the installer will ensure these features are properly set up.

6. Testing and Adjustments

After the door is installed, the installer will test its operation. They will check that the door opens and closes smoothly, and adjust the springs, opener, and sensors to ensure everything works correctly. They will also check for balance and make any necessary adjustments to prevent future issues.

7. Final Inspection and Cleanup

Once the installation is complete, the installer will conduct a final inspection to ensure everything is functioning correctly. They will also clean up the installation area, removing any debris or packaging materials. Some installers will walk you through the door’s features and provide maintenance tips.

Top Garage Door Installers in Pittsburgh, PA

Here are some of the top-rated garage door installers in Pittsburgh, PA:

1. A1 Garage Door Service

Known for their exceptional customer service, A1 Garage Door Service is a trusted name in Pittsburgh. They offer a wide range of services, including garage door installation, repairs, and maintenance. Their team of skilled technicians ensures fast, reliable service, and they offer same-day installations when needed.

[yo-aloe-vera]

Editing for my own posts: Ao3 absolutely allows meta.

AO3 Etiquette

It would seem a whole new kind of AO3 reader/writer is emerging and it is becoming clear not everyone quite understands how the website community works. Here is some basic guidance on how most people expect you to go about using AO3 to keep this a fun community archive that funtions correctly:

Kudos is for when the story was interesting enough to make you finish reading. If it sucked or was badly written, you probably left. If you finished - you kudos.

If you liked it, you should comment. It can be long and detailed or a literal keysmash. Writers don't care, we just love comments.

No critisism unless the author has specifically asked or agreed to hear it. Even constructive critisism is a no-no unless an author note tells you it's okay. Many people write as a fun hobby or a way to cope with, among other things, insecurity. Don't ruin that for them.

Do not comment to ask the author to write/update something else. It's tacky and off-putting and will probably have the opposite effect than the one you want.

There is no algorithm, it's an archive. Use the search and filter function to add/remove the pairings/characters/tropes etc. you want to read about and it will find you the fics that fit the bill.

For this to work, writers must tag and rate stories. This avoids readers finding the wrong things and missing the stuff they want. I don't care how cringy that trope is in your eyes - it gets tagged.

Character A/Character B means a ROMANTIC or SEXUAL relationship of some kind. Character A&Character B is PLANTONIC, like friendship or family.

Nothing is banned. This is an implicit rule because banning one thing is a slipperly slope to banning another and another, until nothing is allowed anymore. Do not expect anyone to censor for you. Because of the tags system, you are responsible for your own reading experience.

People can create new chapters and sequels/fic series any time after they "complete" a story. So it's considered perfectly normal to subscribe, even to a finished story. You can even subscribe to the author instead just to cover your bases.

Do not repost stories or change the publishing date without an extremely good reason (like a complete top to bottom rewrite). It's an archive, not social media. No one cares what's the most recent, only what fits their tag needs.

Avoid deleting a story you wrote if you hate it - orphan it so others can still enjoy it, without it being connected to you anymore.

This is a creative fanfiction archive. No essays on your insights or theories please. There are other places for that.

I KNOW there's plenty more I missed but I'm trying to cover most of the basics that people seem to be struggling with.

I invite anyone to add to this, but please explain, don't berate.

[researchers-me]

Explore the importance of product testing in the UAE to ensure quality and compliance. Discover various testing services, benefits for manufacturers, and how testing enhances product safety and customer satisfaction.

[sapphia]

USA please listen to me: the price of “teaching them a lesson” is too high. take it from New Zealand, who voted our Labour government out in the last election because they weren’t doing exactly what we wanted and got facism instead.

Trans rights are being attacked, public transport has been defunded, tax cuts issued for the wealthy, they've mass-defunded public services, cut and attacked the disability funding model, cut benefits, diverted transport funding to roads, cut all recent public transport subsidies, cancelled massive important infrastructure projects like damns and ferries (we are three ISLANDS), fast tracked mining, oil, and other massive environmentally detrimental projects and gave the power the to approve these projects singularly to three ministers who have been wined and dined by lobbyists of the companies that have put the bids in to approve them while one of the main minister infers he will not prioritise the protection of endangered species like the archeys frog over mining projects that do massive environmental harm. They have attacked indigenous rights in an attempt to negate the Treaty of Waitangi by “redefining it”; as a backup, they are also trying to remove all mentions of the treaty from legislation starting with our Child Protection laws no longer requiring social workers to consider the importance of Maori children’s culture when placing those children; when the Waitangi Tribunal who oversees indigenous matters sought to enquire about this, the Minister for Children blocked their enquiry in a breach of comity that was condemned in a ruling — too late to do anything — by our Supreme Court. They have repealed labour protections around pay and 90 day trials, reversed our smoking ban, cancelled our EV subsidy, cancelled our water infrastructure scheme that would have given Maori iwi a say in water asset management, cancelled our biggest city’s fuel tax, made our treasury and inland revenue departments less accountable, dispensed of our Productivity Commission, begun work on charter schools and military boot camps in an obvious push towards privatisation, cancelled grants for first home buyers, reduced access to emergency housing, allowed no cause evictions, cancelled our Maori health system that would have given Maori control over their own public medical care and funding, cut funding of services like budgeting advice and food banks, cancelled the consumer advocacy council, cancelled our medicine regulations, repealed free prescriptions, deferred multiple hospital builds, failed to deliver on pre-election medical promises, reversed a gun ban created in response to the mosque shootings, brought back three strikes = life sentence policy, increased minimum wage by half the recommended amount, cancelled fair pay for disabled workers, reduced wheelchair services, reversed our oil and gas exploration ban, cancelled our climate emergency fund, cut science research funding including climate research, removed limits on killing sea lions, cut funding for the climate change commission, weakened our methane targets, cancelled Significant National Areas protections, have begun reversing our ban on live exports. Much of this was passed under urgency.

It’s been six months.

[flashfactts]

Remembered a post on here exposing blur. Saw this today.

Just when I thought it couldn’t get worse. This is absolutely horrifying, I cannot stress it enough.

The yellowed stopper wasn’t as bad as the rest but for some reason I just can’t get over it 💀 OP mentioned that the brand offered to replace it but she declined, and that they weren’t close to expiry in the first place. Can’t believe this costs 700, can’t believe such a shitty fucking brand is allowed to exist so peacefully. I wouldn’t try their products for free even if it wasn’t riddled with fungus or sent down by god himself.

Please do yourselves a favor and boycott this brand, they do not give a rat’s ass about our health and money.

[fbiinspectiontechnology]

How Independent Verification Ensures Manufacturing Excellence in 2025

In today's globalized manufacturing landscape, ensuring product quality isn't just good business practice—it's essential for survival. As we navigate through 2025, the manufacturing sector continues to evolve rapidly with technological advancements, changing regulatory frameworks, and increasing consumer expectations. Amidst these changes, one factor remains constant: the critical role of independent verification in achieving manufacturing excellence.

The Evolving Manufacturing Landscape

Manufacturing has undergone significant transformation in recent years. With supply chains stretching across continents and production often occurring thousands of miles from headquarters, maintaining consistent quality standards presents unprecedented challenges. Factory managers and quality teams face mounting pressure to deliver flawless products while balancing cost constraints and tight deadlines.

According to recent industry reports, nearly 65% of manufacturing defects stem from process inconsistencies that could have been identified through proper quality verification protocols. These inconsistencies not only lead to financial losses but can irreparably damage brand reputation when substandard products reach consumers.

Why Independent Verification Matters Now More Than Ever

Independent verification refers to quality assessment conducted by neutral third parties with no vested interest in production outcomes. Unlike internal quality checks, which may suffer from organizational blind spots or conflicts of interest, third party inspection services provide unbiased evaluation based solely on predetermined quality standards.

This objectivity becomes increasingly valuable as manufacturing complexity grows. Consider these advantages:

Unbiased Quality Assessment: When quality verification comes from an independent source, results reflect actual production conditions without internal pressure to meet quotas or deadlines.

Specialized Expertise: Professional inspection companies employ specialists with deep knowledge of specific industries and manufacturing processes.

Regulatory Compliance: Independent inspectors stay current with evolving international regulations, ensuring products meet market-specific requirements.

Risk Mitigation: Identifying quality issues before shipment prevents costly recalls, returns, and reputation damage.

Manufacturing excellence doesn't happen by accident—it results from rigorous quality management systems supported by independent verification at critical production stages.

Key Components of Effective Independent Verification

Achieving true manufacturing excellence through independent verification requires a structured approach encompassing several key elements:

Comprehensive Factory Audits

The foundation of quality begins with the production environment itself. Factory audit procedures evaluate facilities, equipment, processes, and personnel to ensure they meet required standards. These audits assess:

Physical infrastructure and equipment maintenance

Environmental conditions affecting product quality

Staff qualification and training programs

Documentation and quality management systems

Compliance with ethical and environmental standards

These assessments provide crucial insights into a manufacturer's capability to consistently deliver quality products. Regular factory audits can identify potential issues before they affect production, allowing for timely improvements.

In-Process Quality Checks

Rather than relying solely on final inspections, leading verification approaches incorporate checks throughout the production process. This might include:

Raw material and component verification

First article inspection to validate initial production runs

In-process random sampling and testing

Equipment calibration verification

Production line audits during active manufacturing

For specialized products like industrial piping and tubing, these in-process checks are particularly critical, as defects may not be visible in finished products but could lead to catastrophic failures down the line.

Final Product Inspection

Comprehensive verification concludes with thorough inspection of finished goods before shipment. Depending on industry requirements, this may involve:

Visual inspection for appearance defects

Dimensional verification and tolerance checking

Functional testing under various conditions

Packaging and labeling verification

Documentation review for compliance requirements

By implementing rigorous inspection protocols at each stage, manufacturers can ensure consistent quality and build customer confidence.

Technology Enhancing Independent Verification in 2025

The landscape of quality verification has been transformed by technological advancements. In 2025, these technologies offer unprecedented capabilities:

AI-Powered Visual Inspection: Machine learning algorithms can now detect subtle defects that might escape human inspectors, providing consistent evaluation across thousands of units.

IoT-Connected Testing Equipment: Real-time data collection from testing devices allows for immediate analysis and reporting, streamlining the verification process.

Blockchain-Based Quality Certification: Immutable digital records ensure transparency throughout the supply chain, making quality verification results tamper-proof and instantly verifiable.

Augmented Reality Inspection Tools: On-site inspectors can access expert support remotely, enhancing inspection accuracy while reducing travel requirements.

These technologies enable more thorough verification while improving efficiency—a win-win for manufacturers and customers alike.

Selecting the Right Verification Partner

For companies sourcing products internationally, especially from manufacturing hubs in Asia, choosing the right China inspection service provider can make all the difference. When evaluating potential partners, consider:

Industry-Specific Expertise: Does the provider understand your product category and its unique quality requirements?

Geographic Coverage: Can they perform inspections where your products are manufactured?

Standardized Procedures: Do they follow internationally recognized standards for consistency?

Reporting Clarity: Will their reports provide actionable insights in a format your team can easily utilize?

Technology Integration: Have they embraced modern inspection technologies to enhance effectiveness?

The right partnership creates a seamless extension of your quality team, providing eyes and ears on the ground where production happens.

The Return on Investment in Independent Verification

Some manufacturers view quality verification as an added expense, but experienced businesses understand it as an investment with substantial returns. Consider these financial impacts:

A single product recall can cost millions in direct expenses and lost sales

Customer retention rates increase by up to 25% when quality remains consistent

Premium pricing becomes sustainable when quality excellence is consistently verified

Insurance premiums often decrease with documented quality verification programs

When viewed through this lens, independent verification becomes not just a quality assurance measure but a strategic business advantage.

Looking Forward: The Future of Manufacturing Excellence

As we progress through 2025 and beyond, manufacturing excellence will increasingly depend on robust, technology-enhanced independent verification. Companies that embrace comprehensive quality standards supported by third-party validation will gain competitive advantages in increasingly demanding markets.

By investing in thorough independent verification processes—from initial factory audits through final product inspection—manufacturers can ensure their products meet the highest quality standards consistently. This commitment to excellence protects brand reputation, enhances customer satisfaction, and ultimately drives sustainable business growth.

The path to manufacturing excellence may require investment and effort, but the alternatives—quality failures, customer dissatisfaction, and damaged reputations—come at a far higher cost.

Is your organization leveraging independent verification to achieve manufacturing excellence? The answer to this question may well determine your competitive position in the rapidly evolving marketplace of 2025 and beyond.