#Bahraich violence case

[rightnewshindi]

बहराइच हिंसा मामले में एसटीएफ और यूपी पुलिस की बड़ी कार्यवाही, एनकाउंटर के बाद सरफराज और तालिब गिरफ्तार

बहराइच हिंसा मामले में एसटीएफ और यूपी पुलिस की बड़ी कार्यवाही, एनकाउंटर के बाद सरफराज और तालिब गिरफ्तार #News #NewsUpdate #newsfeed #newsbreakapp

Uttar Pradesh News: बहराइच हिंसा में राम गोपाल हत्याकांड मामले में यूपी एसटीएफ और यूपी पुलिस ने बड़ी कार्रवाई की है। पुलिस ने हिंसा के मुख्य आरोपी सरफराज और तालिब को एनकाउंटर में गिरफ़्तार कर लिया है। एनकाउंटर के दौरान दोनों आरोपियों के पैर में गोली मारी गई है। गोली लगने से घायल दोनों आरोपियों को पुलिस ने नानपारा सीएचसी में भर्ती कराया, यहां से उन्हें जिला अस्पताल ले जाया गया। डॉक्टरों के अनुसार…

[hindustanmorning]

Bulldozer to destroy suspect's house in violence case

Bulldozers will demolish the house of the prime suspect involved in the unrest that occurred during the Durga idol immersion in Bahraich, Uttar Pradesh. On Friday, the Public Works Department (PWD) issued a demolition notice for Abdul Hameed’s house due to illegal construction, following his involvement in the Bahraich violence. Hameed and four others are currently in police custody. The Uttar…

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 16th October. In modern Bharat, the term “fascist” or “xenophobic” has become the go-to label for anyone aligning the country with its ancient Hindu culture. Islamists and leftists are quick to brand individuals as Hindu nationalists or extremists when they express pride in Bharat’s cultural heritage. Yet, a contradictory narrative emerges when these same groups unhesitatingly label Muslim-majority areas as “Muslim areas.” This duality is not only hypocritical but also raises deep concerns about the growing exclusionary discourse in these so-called “Muslim areas.” For years, incidents of aggression against Hindu festivals and processions—like Ram Navami, Hanuman Jayanti, Durga Puja, and Saraswati Puja—have highlighted a disturbing pattern of violence in specific localities. These events, often celebrated with great enthusiasm, have been met with stone-pelting, riots, and other forms of hostility in regions dominated by Muslim communities. The term “Muslim area” has come to represent an implicit “No-Go Zone” for Hindu religious processions, enforced by both violence on the ground and ideological cover provided by leftist and Islamist factions. The Creation of ‘No-Go Zones’ and Islamo-Leftist Manipulation The emergence of so-called “No-Go Zones” in Bharat is closely tied to the Islamo-leftist agenda. These zones are areas where Hindu traditions, processions, and religious celebrations are neither welcome nor tolerated, often leading to violent confrontations. In such instances, the provocations aren’t initiated by the Hindu community but by Islamist factions lying in wait for processions to cross into these “Muslim areas.” The violent response to these religious celebrations has become routine, with weapons like stones, petrol bombs, and even firearms being used to attack participants. What follows these attacks is equally alarming: the second faction of the Islamo-leftist ecosystem, responsible for reshaping the narrative, steps in. Through social media, opinion pieces, and various other platforms, they quickly shift the blame onto the Hindu community, portraying the victims of violence as the instigators. Terms like “provocation” are weaponized to justify the violence, often accusing the Hindu processions of inciting the mob through “loud music” or by crossing into “sensitive” areas. The use of “Muslim areas” as a justification for violence is a glaring contradiction—those who champion equality and secularism suddenly find it acceptable to segregate Bharat along religious lines when it serves their agenda. Two Case Studies: Nuh and Bahraich Violence Two recent incidents illustrate this disturbing pattern. Nuh Violence (July 31, 2023): The violence that erupted in Nuh, Haryana during the Vishwa Hindu Parishad’s (VHP) Brij Mandal Jalabhishek procession is a stark example of the Islamo-leftist strategy in action. The procession, organized in a predominantly Muslim area, was attacked by stone-pelters. The violence resulted in the deaths of two home guards and a Hindu devotee, along with injuries to police officers. However, instead of focusing on the instigators of the violence, the narrative quickly shifted to blame the Hindu community for entering a “Muslim area” and “provoking” the attack. This narrative gained traction despite overwhelming evidence that the violence was premeditated, with Islamist mobs armed and ready for confrontation. Yet, the Islamo-leftist media and intellectual ecosystem remained fixated on questioning why the Hindu procession entered the area in the first place, subtly justifying the violence. Bahraich Violence (October 13, 2023): In Bahraich, Uttar Pradesh, during the Maa Durga immersion procession, a similar pattern unfolded. As the procession passed by a mosque, tensions escalated when local Islamists demanded the music accompanying the procession be stopped. The refusal led to stone-pelting, and in the ensuing chaos, bullets were fired at the procession. Tragically, a 22-year-old participant named Ram Gopal Mishra was shot and killed.

Following this incident, the Islamo-leftist faction again rushed to downplay the violence. Instead of condemning the attack on the procession, they attempted to justify the violence by accusing the Hindu community of “provocation,” a tactic often used to shift blame away from the aggressors. The Stark Hypocrisy of Islamo-Leftist Discourse At the heart of this debate is the blatant hypocrisy exhibited by the Islamo-leftist coalition. On the one hand, they justify violence against Hindu processions by claiming “provocation” and delineating certain regions as “Muslim areas.” On the other hand, when a Muslim individual is held accountable for criminal activity in Hindu-majority areas, the same voices are quick to decry intolerance and bigotry. This double standard is most evident when Hindu religious processions are disrupted by violent mobs, which the Islamo-leftist narrative excuses as reactions to provocation. In contrast, if a Muslim individual faces consequences for theft or assault, the discourse shifts to claims of religious persecution and systemic discrimination. The Role of the Police and Discriminatory Practices Bharat’s law enforcement also plays a role in enabling this environment. Time and again, the police’s inability or reluctance to take decisive action against Islamist agitators has only emboldened such behavior. Instead of addressing the root causes, the police often follow a pre-established, discriminatory standard operating procedure (SOP). This SOP typically involves pacifying the aggressors while stifling the voices of the Hindu community. By doing so, law enforcement indirectly reinforces the idea that Hindu religious activities are subject to the “permission” of Islamist factions in certain regions. This approach, rather than resolving communal tensions, serves to entrench the idea that “Muslim areas” exist as regions where Hindu cultural and religious rights are curtailed. Such a narrative not only undermines Bharat’s secular ethos but also marginalizes Hindus from exercising their legitimate rights in parts of their own country. Conclusion The rise of the “Muslim area” narrative, fueled by Islamists and leftists, poses a significant threat to Bharat’s social fabric. The selective outrage, whitewashing of violence, and manipulation of public perception through well-coordinated narratives reflect a broader agenda to marginalize Hindu cultural practices. This Islamo-leftist hypocrisy not only distorts the truth but also threatens to create further divisions within Bharatiya society. The labeling of certain areas as “Muslim areas” is not only hypocritical but also dangerous. Bharat is a secular nation, and no religious community should claim exclusive control over any geographical area. The very idea of communal “No-Go Zones” runs counter to the democratic principles enshrined in the Constitution. It is imperative that both law enforcement and the broader society stand against this trend, ensuring that all citizens, regardless of their faith, can celebrate their traditions and exercise their rights freely across the country. The Islamo-leftist narrative is a form of selective outrage designed to divide rather than unite. By addressing this hypocrisy head-on, Bharat can preserve its unity, diversity, and secular character while ensuring that no community is allowed to dictate terms that curtail the rights of others.   The post Exposing Hypocrisy, Defending Unity: No Room for Double Standards in a Secular Bharat appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[news365times]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 16th October. In modern Bharat, the term “fascist” or “xenophobic” has become the go-to label for anyone aligning the country with its ancient Hindu culture. Islamists and leftists are quick to brand individuals as Hindu nationalists or extremists when they express pride in Bharat’s cultural heritage. Yet, a contradictory narrative emerges when these same groups unhesitatingly label Muslim-majority areas as “Muslim areas.” This duality is not only hypocritical but also raises deep concerns about the growing exclusionary discourse in these so-called “Muslim areas.” For years, incidents of aggression against Hindu festivals and processions—like Ram Navami, Hanuman Jayanti, Durga Puja, and Saraswati Puja—have highlighted a disturbing pattern of violence in specific localities. These events, often celebrated with great enthusiasm, have been met with stone-pelting, riots, and other forms of hostility in regions dominated by Muslim communities. The term “Muslim area” has come to represent an implicit “No-Go Zone” for Hindu religious processions, enforced by both violence on the ground and ideological cover provided by leftist and Islamist factions. The Creation of ‘No-Go Zones’ and Islamo-Leftist Manipulation The emergence of so-called “No-Go Zones” in Bharat is closely tied to the Islamo-leftist agenda. These zones are areas where Hindu traditions, processions, and religious celebrations are neither welcome nor tolerated, often leading to violent confrontations. In such instances, the provocations aren’t initiated by the Hindu community but by Islamist factions lying in wait for processions to cross into these “Muslim areas.” The violent response to these religious celebrations has become routine, with weapons like stones, petrol bombs, and even firearms being used to attack participants. What follows these attacks is equally alarming: the second faction of the Islamo-leftist ecosystem, responsible for reshaping the narrative, steps in. Through social media, opinion pieces, and various other platforms, they quickly shift the blame onto the Hindu community, portraying the victims of violence as the instigators. Terms like “provocation” are weaponized to justify the violence, often accusing the Hindu processions of inciting the mob through “loud music” or by crossing into “sensitive” areas. The use of “Muslim areas” as a justification for violence is a glaring contradiction—those who champion equality and secularism suddenly find it acceptable to segregate Bharat along religious lines when it serves their agenda. Two Case Studies: Nuh and Bahraich Violence Two recent incidents illustrate this disturbing pattern. Nuh Violence (July 31, 2023): The violence that erupted in Nuh, Haryana during the Vishwa Hindu Parishad’s (VHP) Brij Mandal Jalabhishek procession is a stark example of the Islamo-leftist strategy in action. The procession, organized in a predominantly Muslim area, was attacked by stone-pelters. The violence resulted in the deaths of two home guards and a Hindu devotee, along with injuries to police officers. However, instead of focusing on the instigators of the violence, the narrative quickly shifted to blame the Hindu community for entering a “Muslim area” and “provoking” the attack. This narrative gained traction despite overwhelming evidence that the violence was premeditated, with Islamist mobs armed and ready for confrontation. Yet, the Islamo-leftist media and intellectual ecosystem remained fixated on questioning why the Hindu procession entered the area in the first place, subtly justifying the violence. Bahraich Violence (October 13, 2023): In Bahraich, Uttar Pradesh, during the Maa Durga immersion procession, a similar pattern unfolded. As the procession passed by a mosque, tensions escalated when local Islamists demanded the music accompanying the procession be stopped. The refusal led to stone-pelting, and in the ensuing chaos, bullets were fired at the procession. Tragically, a 22-year-old participant named Ram Gopal Mishra was shot and killed.

Following this incident, the Islamo-leftist faction again rushed to downplay the violence. Instead of condemning the attack on the procession, they attempted to justify the violence by accusing the Hindu community of “provocation,” a tactic often used to shift blame away from the aggressors. The Stark Hypocrisy of Islamo-Leftist Discourse At the heart of this debate is the blatant hypocrisy exhibited by the Islamo-leftist coalition. On the one hand, they justify violence against Hindu processions by claiming “provocation” and delineating certain regions as “Muslim areas.” On the other hand, when a Muslim individual is held accountable for criminal activity in Hindu-majority areas, the same voices are quick to decry intolerance and bigotry. This double standard is most evident when Hindu religious processions are disrupted by violent mobs, which the Islamo-leftist narrative excuses as reactions to provocation. In contrast, if a Muslim individual faces consequences for theft or assault, the discourse shifts to claims of religious persecution and systemic discrimination. The Role of the Police and Discriminatory Practices Bharat’s law enforcement also plays a role in enabling this environment. Time and again, the police’s inability or reluctance to take decisive action against Islamist agitators has only emboldened such behavior. Instead of addressing the root causes, the police often follow a pre-established, discriminatory standard operating procedure (SOP). This SOP typically involves pacifying the aggressors while stifling the voices of the Hindu community. By doing so, law enforcement indirectly reinforces the idea that Hindu religious activities are subject to the “permission” of Islamist factions in certain regions. This approach, rather than resolving communal tensions, serves to entrench the idea that “Muslim areas” exist as regions where Hindu cultural and religious rights are curtailed. Such a narrative not only undermines Bharat’s secular ethos but also marginalizes Hindus from exercising their legitimate rights in parts of their own country. Conclusion The rise of the “Muslim area” narrative, fueled by Islamists and leftists, poses a significant threat to Bharat’s social fabric. The selective outrage, whitewashing of violence, and manipulation of public perception through well-coordinated narratives reflect a broader agenda to marginalize Hindu cultural practices. This Islamo-leftist hypocrisy not only distorts the truth but also threatens to create further divisions within Bharatiya society. The labeling of certain areas as “Muslim areas” is not only hypocritical but also dangerous. Bharat is a secular nation, and no religious community should claim exclusive control over any geographical area. The very idea of communal “No-Go Zones” runs counter to the democratic principles enshrined in the Constitution. It is imperative that both law enforcement and the broader society stand against this trend, ensuring that all citizens, regardless of their faith, can celebrate their traditions and exercise their rights freely across the country. The Islamo-leftist narrative is a form of selective outrage designed to divide rather than unite. By addressing this hypocrisy head-on, Bharat can preserve its unity, diversity, and secular character while ensuring that no community is allowed to dictate terms that curtail the rights of others.   The post Exposing Hypocrisy, Defending Unity: No Room for Double Standards in a Secular Bharat appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link