#Anticipatory Bail Coimbatore

[shanmugamadvocate]

From Consultation to Resolution: Trusted Advocates in Coimbatore - Shanmugam Associates

Finding the right legal representation can make all the difference when navigating the complexities of the legal system. Advocate in Coimbatore, Shanmugam Associates stands out as a trusted name, providing expert legal services with a commitment to excellence and client satisfaction.

About Shanmugam Associates

History and Establishment

Shanmugam Associates has a rich history of serving the legal needs of Coimbatore’s residents and businesses. Established decades ago, the firm has grown into a reputable practice known for its dedication to justice and comprehensive legal expertise.

Mission and Vision

The mission of Shanmugam Associates is to provide top-tier legal services that uphold the highest standards of integrity and professionalism. Their vision is to be the leading law firm in Coimbatore, recognized for their ability to achieve favorable outcomes for their clients.

Core Values and Principles

At the heart of Shanmugam Associates are their core values: integrity, commitment, client-centricity, and excellence. These principles guide their practice and ensure that every client receives the best possible representation.

Areas of Practice

Civil Law

Shanmugam Associates excels in civil law, handling a wide range of cases including contract disputes, property disputes, and consumer protection cases. Their expertise ensures that clients receive fair and just outcomes in civil matters.

Criminal Law

When it comes to criminal law, Shanmugam Associates provides robust defense against criminal charges, representation in criminal trials, and assistance with bail and anticipatory bail. Their team is adept at navigating the complexities of criminal cases to protect their clients’ rights.

Family Law

Family law matters require sensitivity and expertise. Shanmugam Associates offers comprehensive services in divorce and separation, child custody and support, and domestic violence cases, ensuring that clients receive compassionate and effective representation.

Corporate Law

In the realm of corporate law, Shanmugam Associates assists with company formation and compliance, mergers and acquisitions, and intellectual property rights. Their legal acumen helps businesses navigate the regulatory landscape and achieve their corporate goals.

Property Law

Property law is another area where Shanmugam Associates shines. They handle property transactions, landlord-tenant disputes, and real estate litigation with precision and expertise, ensuring that clients’ property rights are protected.

Why Choose Shanmugam Associates?

Experienced and Skilled Team

The team at Shanmugam Associates comprises seasoned legal professionals with extensive experience in various legal fields. Their collective expertise Advocate in Coimbatore ensures that clients receive informed and effective legal counsel.

Client-Centric Approach

Shanmugam Associates places clients at the center of their practice. They take the time to understand each client’s unique situation and tailor their legal strategies to achieve the best possible outcomes.

Proven Track Record of Success

With a history of successful cases and satisfied clients, Shanmugam Associates has built a reputation for delivering results. Their proven track record speaks volumes about their capability and dedication.

Transparent and Ethical Practices

Integrity and transparency are fundamental to Shanmugam Associates’ operations. They maintain clear communication with clients and adhere to ethical practices, ensuring trust and confidence in their services.

Client Testimonials

Clients consistently praise Shanmugam Associates for their professionalism, expertise, and compassionate approach. Success stories from satisfied clients highlight the firm’s ability to handle complex legal matters and achieve favorable outcomes.

Consultation Process

How to Schedule a Consultation

Scheduling a consultation with Shanmugam Associates is simple. Clients can contact the firm via phone or through their website to set up an initial meeting.

What to Expect During the Initial Meeting

During the initial consultation, clients can expect a thorough discussion of their legal issues, an overview of potential strategies, and a clear understanding of the next steps. Shanmugam Associates provides personalized legal advice tailored to each client’s needs.

Customized Legal Strategies

Shanmugam Associates believes in creating customized legal strategies for each client. They take into account the specific circumstances and goals of the client to develop a plan that maximizes the chances of a successful resolution.

Conclusion

Shanmugam Associates stands out as a premier law firm in Coimbatore, offering comprehensive legal services across various practice areas. Their commitment to excellence, client centric approach, and proven track record make them the ideal choice for anyone seeking reliable Advocate in Coimbatore legal representation. Whether you’re dealing with a civil dispute, criminal charges, family issues, corporate matters, or property concerns, Shanmugam Associates has the expertise to guide you from consultation to resolution.

[thewrosper]

Backstory: In Parallel With the COVID 19 Pandemic, We Now Have a Pandemic of Arrests

Lockdown – the word that best describes our present physical and mental state – has now acquired a vicious new meaning. As if in parallel to the COVID-19 pandemic, we now have a pandemic of arrests, with prison gates clanging shut on those marked by the state as anti-nationals. Consider, for a moment, this last fortnight. It began with Gautam Navlakha and Anand Teltumbde, prominent intellectuals and political activists, being jailed. Both marked their impending incarceration with letters that held up a mirror to their country. Navlakha pointed to how the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act has turned jurisprudence upside down: “No longer is it the axiom that ‘a person is innocent unless proven guilty’. In fact, under such Acts, ‘an accused is guilty unless proven innocent’” (‘‘My Hope Rests on a Speedy and Fair Trial’: Gautam Navlakha Before His Surrender’, April 14). Teltumbde begins with the observation that he is aware that what he writes may be drowned in the “motivated cacophony of the BJP and RSS combine and the subservient media”. Sure enough, large sections of the media blanked out all news of the arrest (‘Hindi Newspapers Look Away as Anand Teltumbde Is Arrested’, April 15). This deliberate deletion is part of the larger strategy to erase any evidence of state repression, as Teltumbde’s letter points out: “An individual like me obviously cannot counter the spirited propaganda of the government and its subservient media. The details of the case are strewn across the internet and are enough for any person to see that it is a clumsy and criminal fabrication.” A analytical piece in The Wire (‘Why Is Anand Teltumbde So Dangerous for the Narendra Modi Government?’, April 14) argues that it is his stance as a “progressive intellectual wall against the neoliberal Hindutva of the RSS-BJP”, that makes him such an important target. Similarly, there are excellent reasons why credible, argumentative journalists also invite the displeasure of the powerful. The Wire has had a taste of state repression. On April 10, one of the founder editors of the portal was visited by the UP Police (‘Attempts to Muzzle the Media’: More Than 200 Journalists Condemn FIRs Against The Wire’, April 12) for allegedly causing panic by reporting that the UP chief minister had attended a religious event on March 25. That, of course, is a matter of public record and a wrongly attributed quote in the report had been duly retracted along with a corrigendum. Yet none of this served to halt the UP police from driving all the way from Faizabad to Delhi amidst the lockdown, to serve a notice on Siddharth Varadarajan. This is by no means the first instance of police high-handedness. Over the last year, over a dozen cases have been filed against journalists by the UP police, according to a recent report filed by Kunal Majumder of the Committee to Protect Journalists. Hunting journalists down has now become part of active policing in these COVID-19 times. Over the course of a week, at least four mediapersons in Kashmir have had FIRs filed against them. Two of them were booked under UAPA, photojournalist Masrat Zahra (‘Kashmiri Photojournalist Charged Under UAPA for Unspecified Social Media Posts’, April 20) and author-commentator Gowhar Geelani, who in an interview to The Wire interpreted the move as a bid to criminalise journalism in Kashmir (‘The Assault Is on Journalism’: An Interview With Kashmiri Journalist Gowhar Geelani’, April 23). The case against Masrat Zahra has been registered under Section 13 of UAPA. Revisiting this Section is educative. The key reason why UAPA is so effective as a tool of state coercion is the broad manner in which the offence is framed and this Section lays down that not only are persons who take part in “unlawful activity” liable for punishment,  anyone who “advocates, abets, advises or incites the commission of, any unlawful activity” can be  imprisoned for a term which may extend to seven years under the law. We need to remember here that we are now seeing the results of the amendment to UAPA, passed in parliament in August 2019 shortly before the abrogation of Article 370 on August 5. Through that amendment, the government and its police assumed the power to take action not just against organisations deemed as terrorist, but against individuals, too. Union home minister Amit Shah not only piloted that amendment in parliament but justified it forcefully, arguing that acts of terror are done by individuals, not organisations. The logic inherent in that argument has now led to the scary outcomes that we are witnessing today, with the police drawing up elaborate conspiracy theories in a bid to make the charges stick. Journalists should be alert to the consequences this holds for others, because the same could wreak havoc on their own lives as well. Today it may be the Jamia students who had come out in protest against the Citizenship Amendment Act (‘‘Terrorism’ Charge a Lesson for Jamia Students that Democratic Protest Carries Heavy Cost’) and are now being imprisoned under a draconian law which has no provision for anticipatory bail; tomorrow it could be their colleagues or themselves. It appears that while we wear our masks and stay at home under the lockdown, the Modi government and assorted state governments under BJP rule are displaying an uncommon appetite to place all those it has marked as “enemies of the state” – even if it is just a comment they put out in the public domain – under lock and key. They may not have an UAPA hammer smashing down on them, but they and their families have to contend with the terror of impending imprisonment. Over the last few days, we’ve had the Manipur government locking up Mohammed Chengiz Khan, who is doing his PhD at JNU, for critiquing the state’s government’s anti-Muslim policies. The Gujarat police booked Prashant Bhushan, well-known lawyer, for a tweet. A spirited, socially conscious former bureaucrat, Kannan Gopinath, and a news editor, Ashlin Mathew, have invited police action from the Gujarat state government  for their responses to a government order (‘FIR Against Prashant Bhushan, Kannan Gopinathan in Gujarat’, April 15). As if to indicate the pan-national nature of such aggravated police action, we now have the Coimbatore police march Andrew Sam Raja Pandian, founder of the news portal, ‘SimpliCity’, to jail for highlighting the looting of ration shops and lack of food for students (‘Coimbatore: Founder of News Portal Arrested for Reporting on Government’s Handling of COVID-19’, April 24). Please note that none of the above had Union ministers rushing to defend them, or the Supreme Court keeping aside urgent matters in order to provide them a patient hearing, as was the case with the editor-in-chief of Republic TV (‘SC Allows Hate Speech Probe Against Arnab Goswami to Proceed, Stays Multiple FIRs’, ‘SC’s Interim Protection to Arnab Goswami: What It Does and Doesn’t Say’, April 24). Is this just state paranoia that is playing out, or does this portend a new cycle of ever-deepening, ever-inexplicable state tyranny? COVID-19 is set to alter forever the political and social landscape of the country at multiple levels (‘What Will Politics Look Like in the Post-Pandemic World?’, April 13; ‘The Economy Needs a Survival Strategy – and Not Just Stimulus – to Recover From COVID-19’; ‘Children Will Be More Vulnerable to Trafficking After COVID-19’, April 13), but how alert are we to the permanent damage this phase will wrought on our rights and liberties? How alert is the Indian media to this? Incidentally, India’s free fall in terms of the World Press Freedom Index – it currently stands at 142 in a tally of 180 countries – is a story in itself. Even Bolsanaro’s Brazil is streets ahead. As the writer of the piece, ‘If We’re at ‘War’ With the New Coronavirus, We’re Doing It Wrong’ (April 15), observes, the way we use language to define COVID-19 needs attention.The war metaphor is not useful: “In this conception, the virus becomes an agile enemy, the national leader’s actions are shows of strength, the suspension of civilian rights becomes a matter of necessity, and every citizen is seen as a soldier with well-defined orders and a quasi-duty to self-censor.” Gulshan Ewing:  the most glamorous was also the kindest When news that elderly patients in UK’s care homes were succumbing at an alarming rate to COVID 19, I didn’t imagine for a moment that the disease would also take away 92-year-old Gulshan Ewing, editor of two Mumbai staples, Eve’s Weekly and Star and Style. A resident of a care home in London’s Richmond area, she succumbed to the disease on April 21, a few days before her daughter, Anjali, had tweeted: “My mother is NOT receiving the same level of care in her care home as Boris did in hospital. We are all equal and all in this together. Aren’t we? @BorisJohnson @10DowningStreet @DominicRaab @MattHancock @tnewtondunn @bbclaurak @BBCHughPym @GuidoFawkes” Gulshan’s era was certainly kinder to those who helmed media institutions than is the case today, but what must have helped her longevity as an editor was the kindness and teamship she brought to her long innings. Glamorous she may have been, rubbing shoulders with the likes of Cary Grant and Raj Kapoor, Alfred Hitchcock and Nargis Dutt, partying with beauty queens and supping with the crème-de-la-crème of Bombay society, but within the office she remained cool, unflappable in her brightly patterned chiffons and chunky rings – even when her celebrity columnist, Devyani Chaubal (clad at all times in embroidered white organzas), threw a tantrum and would need to be coaxed to write up her next column. By the 1980s, second wave feminism had made an emphatic entry and the new generation of women journalists who landed up at Gulshan’s desk disdained much of what she took great pleasure in. They loathed the beauty contests that sometimes brought instant international fame – Reita Faria, India’s first Miss India, was Gulshan’s catch, make no mistake – and they even found the very name ‘Eve’s Weekly’, an affront to their senses. But they realised that the matrix of the women’s magazine was a great trojan horse to smuggle in feminist ideas. Along with recipe spreads and knitting patterns, many radical notions would make their way into unsuspecting households. Household hint: squeeze out a little Colgate to clean the family silver and, while you are at it, remember that you, yourself, are not a beautiful object to be displayed at home. Use a little foundation under the eye to cover up those dark circles, but also remember being beaten by the “lord and master” is a criminal, unacceptable act. Gulshan was too intelligent a woman not to recognise the changes that were taking place, and somewhere she made the decision that while she would continue with her social whirl and beauty contests, she would allow her junior colleagues to mould parts of the magazine to their liking. In fact, she also knew how she could make feminism work for her. Among the questions she asked as she interviewed me – a Times of India sub-editor – for a job as chief sub, was what my plans of being a mother were about. When I shrugged away the intrusive query, she smiled, “Yes, you are a modern woman and don’t believe in rushing to have children I am sure!” This live-and-let-live approach helped her to negotiate an unbroken run as editor from 1966 to 1989, possibly making her India’s longest serving woman editor. Lockdown and I In the last column, readers had written in about their experiences of lockdown. This time Khubrooh Siddiqui had this to say: “These are my circumstances during this abrupt and insane  lockdown. I am stranded in Ghaziabad, which has been my home city for the last 15 years. My husband is stuck in Kolkata. His father is in his late 70s and is mentally unstable, making life impossible for my husband, continuously shouting and throwing things around. At one point, he almost threw down my husband’s laptop, which is crucial for his work. I feel helpless because I cannot reach out to him at this time, knowing that he himself is often seized by extreme anxiety, and his doctor has recently modified his medicine dosage knowing that I am not there to help him. I dread to think what may happen over the next days. I don’t know if I am in a better position than others who may not have food to eat, but I can say, for sure, that I am absolutely desperate to reach Kolkata. I can only urge the authorities to let stranded people like us go to our respective destinations.” Attack on press freedom A letter from Satish Mahaldar, chairman, Reconciliation, Return & Rehabilitation of Migrants, New Delhi: “In these difficult times of a pandemic, when people associated with essential services like the Media, Health workers and the Police are doing everything they can to save people, certain vested interests are trying to cause harm.  The responsibility to disseminate news in an atmosphere where rumour mongering and fake news is the order of the day, there have been attacks on media personnel. I wish to draw attention to acts of intimidation by certain elements against the reputed news service, Indo-Asian News Service (IANS).  Its subscribers and journalists are being threatened for its reportage on the issue of Tablighi Jamaat and its role in the spread of the corona virus. As these threats were persisting, IANS has been forced to file three criminal intimidation cases against individuals who claim to be the members of  the Jamaat. The attempts to muzzle IANS and other media organisations are not only criminal but an attack on the freedom of the media. Such acts should not only be condemned but the perpetrators must be held accountable for their anti-democratic activities. We urge stern governmental action against such miscreants.” Songs for the Migrant Kaushik Raj, who described himself as a poet and activist, wrote and recorded this poem on the “plight of migrant workers who had to walk hundreds of kilometres after lockdown in their bid to reach home”. He sent across the IGTV and Facebook links of the two-minute poem: The same topic inspired Poojan Sahil, to compose and perform this three-minute song. He asks why we as a society has always neglected this section of the population: Read the full article

[todaybharatnews]

via Today Bharat Catapulted to national attention by that one statement on Godse and Hindu terror, actor-politician Kamal Haasan has now come up with an elaborate exposition that the very term lsquo;Hindursquo; is not an Indian description but a foreign coinage of ancient time which the British endorsed for convenience. Neither the Alwars nor the Nayanmars, the famed Vaishnavite and Shaivite saints, had made any mention of lsquo;Hindursquo;, he said on twitter. ldquo;We were christened Hindus by Mughals or those (foreign) rulers who predated himrdquo;, he said, adding that the British had lsquo;endorsedrsquo; that coinage. The citizens were identified as lsquo;Indiansrsquo;, so it would be erroneous to box them all into a religion. ldquo;While we have so many of our own identities, it is ignorant to have as our name and faith something given to us by non-nativerdquo;, said Kamal. ldquo;To put it in laymanrsquo;s terms, living in harmony has a million benefitsrdquo;, he said drawing from a Tamil saying.nbsp; Later speaking to reporters at the airport on his arrival from hectic campaigning, Kamal sought to play down his burden of lsquo;Hindursquo; terrorist by declaring, ldquo;Every religion has its own terroristsrdquo; and so ldquo;none can claim to be sanctimoniousrdquo;. nbsp;nbsp; nbsp; Asked if he could have avoided the Godse comment, Kamal said he stood firm on his remarks and he had said the same thing even earlier during a Marina rally but no one bothered about that. Only people whose confidence has dipped now were creating tension. He furter added saying every religion has its own terrorist. To a question if he had applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest, he replied in the negative. ldquo;I donrsquo;t fear arrest. Let them arrest me but that would escalate tensions. So better not to do that (arrest). This is not my request but an advicerdquo;, he said, while reiterating his charge that the media hadsubjected his (Godse) speech at Aravakurichi (Sunday night) to selective editing. Asked if he felt intimidated by minister Rajendra Balaji saying his tongue should be cut off or by incidents such as the stone-pelting and hurling of chappal at his campaign meeting, Kamal said Balajirsquo;s tongue threat ldquo;shows his characterrdquo; and as for fear, he had none. To a question if he would apologise to the apolitical Hindus for his Godse comment, he said one should differentiate between Hindus and the RSS. ldquo;We should differentiate who are Hindus, who is RSS. You canrsquo;t generalise. Political functionaries will get hurt any time,non-political persons with a faith will only wonder for sometime why he has spoken like this...things like getting hurt, getting angry and attacking are political tools. They are violent tools,rdquo; he said, pointing out that even in the past, various groups had protested against him, ldquo;but people later realised they were not properrdquo;. On Prime Minister Narendra Modirsquo;s statement that a Hindu cannot be a terrorist, Kamal said, ldquo;Many think he is very knowledgeable. Therefore history and history professors are there to respond to himrdquo;. On police denying him permission to undertake campaigning in Sulur Assembly constituency in Coimbatore on Friday, he wondered why the EC did not opt to postpone the by-poll if it thought there was a problem there. Meanwhile, he has uploaded a video on his Twitter page, in an apparent retort to his being denied permission to canvass votes in Sulur on the last day of campaign schedule. ldquo;Permission was denied to me to undertake campaign in one place (Sulur). Thanks to science, here is my campaign,rdquo; he said. nbsp;

[dailymagazinblog]

Coimbatore (Tamil Nadu) [India], Nov 11 (ANI): Amid reports suggesting that All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) workers vandalised the posters of the movie 'Sarkar' while protesting against the release of the film, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Edappadi K Palaniswami claimed that it was a protest by common people and not AIADMK cadres. "It wasn't AIADMK. It was a protest by common people. Through the movie, schemes of the government are being criticised vehemently," Palaniswami said at a press conference here. The Chief Minister, while questioning the source of funding for the film, asked: "They spend Rs 300-500 crore to make a film, where does this money come from?" After protests were witnessed against the alleged negative portrayal of late AIADMK Chief J. Jayalalithaa in the Vijay-starrer, the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) had made three cuts in the film and removed certain objectionable scenes. In a new certificate issued by the CBFC, the three cuts have reduced the duration of the movie by five seconds. Previously, the runtime of the movie was 164 minutes and 46 seconds, which has now been revised to 164 minutes 41 seconds. The movie ran into trouble over some scenes that allegedly criticised the Tamil Nadu government led by Jayalalithaa. The first cut in the movie deleted the "visuals of throwing mixie and grinder in fire", which was 5 seconds long. The second cut involved muting the name 'Komala' "from the full name "Komalavalli" (wherever it occurs)". The name was even removed from the "corresponding subtitle". In the third cut, the dialogues 'Podhuppaniththurai' which roughly stands for Public Works Department, and '56 varusham' or 56 years were muted and was removed from their corresponding subtitles. The movie will now be shown with a U/A certification. On Thursday, protesters tore the posters of the movie in Coimbatore, Madurai, and Chennai and demanded the arrest of the film's director A.R. Murugadoss. However, the Madras High Court on Friday issued a restraining order against his arrest till November 27 after he sought an anticipatory bail in this case. The agitated protestors had also vandalised theatres where the movie was being screened. Earlier, Tamil Nadu Law minister C.V. Shanmugam had condemned Vijay's recent release for allegedly attempting to instigate violence and said that it was not less than a terrorist instigating people for violence. The film, which released on November 7, earned over Rs 100 crores within two days of its release. (ANI)

https://www.aninews.in/news/common-people-opposed-sarkar-screening-not-aiadmk-workers-palaniswami201811111859020001/

[lazyupdates]

In a jolt to the Tamil Nadu government’s attempts to muzzle free press, a court in Coimbatore on Monday granted anticipatory bail to film director Ameer. The Peelamedu police in Coimbatore earlier this month had registered a case against Ameer for his alleged inflammatory speech at a ‘round table’ discussion organised by private Tamil TV channel Puthiya Thalaimurai.

While granting the anticipatory bail to Ameer, the court judge Sanjai Baba made quite a scathing observation stating that the organiser of the event could not dictate terms to the speakers. The court, according to a report by New Indian Express, found slapping a case on the speaker of a TV debate show to be something new.

According to the local police, while responding to BJP State president Tamilisai Soundararajan, Ameer had made certain remarks about the communal tension that prevailed in Coimbatore in the immediate aftermath of the murder of Hindu Munnani functionary C Sasikumar in 2016. His remarks had caused quite a stir angering the cadres of the Hindu outfit.

The manager of the college auditorium had complained to the police claiming that the channel’s representative had originally booked the hall for recording a students’ programme, but they ended up conducting a political debate. The channel, for its part, vehemently denied the charge and said that it had been running promos several days in advance about the theme of the programme and its likely guests.

The FIR was also registered against Puthiya Thalaimurai channel, one of its journalists, who had booked the venue and MLA U Thaniyarasu. The channel had organised the ‘Round Table debate on people’s right to protest,’ on June 3, in which leaders of various political parties took part, reported PTI.

Later, Editors Guild of India condemned the police action against the channel and blacking out of channels through Arasu Cable. Its statement read, “The Guild is appalled that an FIR has been registered by the TN police against a reporter and the management of Puthiya Thalaimurai, a Tamil news channel under Sec 153 A of the IPC (promoting enmity between groups) and other sections of the law on completely unjustifiable grounds.”

Meanwhile, the affected channels have also complained that such blacking out was a routine occurrence every time they broadcast programmes that were not liked by the Tamil Nadu government. Incidentally, the television channel content distribution agency, Arasu Cable, is controlled by the state government. The Guild sought to remind the Tamil Nadu government that  the latter ought to have adhered to the recommendations of the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of India that barred a government from owning a television channel distribution company.

    Setback to Tamil Nadu government as Coimbatore court grants anticipatory bail to film director Ameer

[shanmugamassociates1]

Shanmugam Associates is your trusted partner for all matters related to anticipatory bail in Coimbatore. With vast experience and in-depth knowledge of the legal system, our team of skilled advocates is dedicated to providing expert guidance and representation. Whether you are facing potential arrest or require assistance with securing anticipatory bail, we offer personalized solutions tailored to meet your specific needs. Trust in our expertise to navigate the complexities of the legal process and protect your rights. Contact Shanmugam Associates today for reliable and effective anticipatory bail advocacy services in Coimbatore.