#(we're our own category and if we need to take steps to define our own experiences)
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Note
That post about bisexuals faking being bisexual or whatever was crazy because like. Even if she was genuinely concerned about how some women are so deep in the closet and want to cling into the bi label for whatever reason, this is not the way to get lesbians to come out. 😭 Like I’m sorry but her bringing up comphet was also uncalled for, considering the controversy over that term + there’s loads of militant gold star lesbians and gays who made it a point that anybody who even looked at the genitals of the opposite sex cannot be homosexual period so like ofc there’s going to be people (esp women) who will laugh over jokes like “ohhh i just think women are so much hotter than men because of cleanliness lol but i am bi!” because of all of that mess. I hope I’m making sense but it’s also weird that people can’t believe that there are genuinely bi people out there who just strongly prefer the same sex and that doesn’t mean they’re faking being bi somehow like 💀
The two types of bisexuals: the attention seeking straights and the self-hating gays/lesbians.
But, on a serious note, this is why I actually hate microlabels/descriptors like 'bihet,' 'febfem,' 'het-partnered,' and 'osa/ssa women' for bisexuals - it obscures the similarities in our experiences, making people think there are different types of bisexual (when, in reality, there's only one category of bisexual - bisexual).
#we live in a society that exists on heterosexual terms#i'm glad if gay/lesbian people can make space for themselves in it#but it's silly to pretend that space for homosexual people in heterosexual society automatically covers all bisexuals#we're not half gay or half straight; we're an entirely different orientation and we need an entirely different way of understanding things#(not to say that heterosexual society is good to homosexual people - just that bisexuals aren't at the intersection of ssa and osa)#(we're our own category and if we need to take steps to define our own experiences)#i'm not sure i agree with 'monosexual' tbh but i get that you're not using that to offend#anon
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Unlocking Harmony and Order with Professional Home Organizer Consultants
Do you often find yourself struggling to maintain a sense of order and harmony in your living spaces? Is clutter taking over your home and causing unnecessary stress? It's time to regain control of your surroundings and bring a new level of organization into your life. Introducing Organizing Sense, your trusted partner in transforming chaotic spaces into serene havens.
We understand the challenges that come with maintaining an organized home. Our mission is to empower you to take charge of your living spaces, no matter how busy your life may be. With our team of expert home organizer consultants, we bring a fresh perspective to decluttering and organizing that goes beyond the surface.
Our Process: Making Organization a Reality
Imagine a world where every item has a designated place, where chaos gives way to tranquility, and where you can effortlessly find what you need when you need it. Our process is designed to make this vision a reality:
Sort and Categorize: The journey begins by sorting your belongings into meaningful categories. This step allows you to see the extent of your possessions in each category, helping you make informed decisions about what to keep and what to let go of.
Edit and Declutter: Making decisions about your belongings can be overwhelming. That's where our professional organizing services shine. We'll guide you through the decision-making process, whether it's choosing to keep, sell, donate, or dispose of an item. Your preferences are our top priority.
Organize and Contain: Once we've identified the items that will stay in your space, we craft an effective organizing system tailored to your needs. Our team will also source any necessary organizing products to maximize space utilization and aesthetics.
Establish Routine: Organizing is not a one-time task; it's a sustainable habit. We'll help you establish routines that ensure the longevity of the newly organized space. With simple yet effective routines in place, you'll effortlessly maintain the harmony you've achieved.
Adi Groysman: Our Visionary Leader
At the heart of Organizing Sense is Adi Groysman, a dynamic leader with an unwavering passion for innovative organizing solutions. With a keen eye for detail and an innate ability to create functional yet beautiful spaces, Adi leads our team in providing the highest quality organizing methods.
In Adi's world, every item has its own story and its perfect spot. It's this philosophy that drives us to bring harmony to your home, enabling you to experience the joy of living in an organized space.
Embrace the Transformation
Embracing the transformation to an organized home is more than just a practical step; it's a journey toward reclaiming control over your surroundings and your life. We're dedicated to making this journey smooth, empowering you to make decisions that align with your lifestyle and preferences.
Start Your Journey Today
Are you ready to experience the magic of an organized space? Whether you're seeking tranquility in your living room, efficiency in your kitchen, or serenity in your bedroom, Organizing Sense is here to guide you. Our team of professional organizing services is eager to understand your unique needs and create a personalized plan that will breathe new life into your spaces.
Don't let clutter define your living experience any longer. Contact us today and embark on a journey of transformation with Organizing Sense. Your harmonious haven awaits!
0 notes
Text
How To Find The Right Web Design Agency?- Tips
If you're looking to improve your website's design and functionality, it's time to find a web design agency. There are plenty of options out there, but finding the right one can be difficult. Here are some guidelines for choosing an agency that will help you get the results that matter most:
Guidelines for finding the right Fredericton web design agency
So, you've decided to hire a web design agency. You're ready to find your way through the maze of agencies and freelancers on the internet. But how do you know which one is right for you?
Here are some guidelines:
Know what you want from the process: Do you need someone who can create an entire website from scratch? Or do they only need to tweak an existing one so that it fits within your budget and goals? If there's more than one option, look at each company’s portfolio and determine which ones seem most suitable based on their designs, experience level with similar clients (or if they've done work in similar industries), client reviews online etc..
Define Your Goals And Target Audience: Once again – this step may seem obvious but many people forget about this crucial step when first starting out on their search for a new web designer! When defining our goals as well as target audience we should also consider things like size of business/organization/brand etc., whether we're looking at expanding our operations into multiple countries across continents or just increasing traffic levels across existing sites such as Facebook pages etc..
Define your goals. Before you begin looking for a web design agency, make sure that you know what kind of project you want to do and who it will appeal to. If this isn't clear yet, try asking yourself some questions like: "What features would I love in my website?" or "How can we make our product more user-friendly?"
Target audience. Once you've defined your goals and established an idea of the kind of website that would meet them best (a portfolio site? A blog? A shopping cart?), ask yourself how many people fall into each category—and if there are any subgroups within those categories (for example, younger versus older users). This information will help determine which designers should be tapped for this project based on their individual skill set and experience level as well as their ability to fit within its specific constraints and requirements.
Analyze and define your budget:
Know your budget. You and your business are in a unique position to determine the most appropriate level of service, so it's important that you take charge of this step. It's also important not to be afraid of negotiating with potential agencies, since they may have different pricing structures than yours.
Ask for discounts or free trials if possible (but not at the expense of quality). If an agency is asking for a specific amount per month as part of their bid, ask them if there are any other ways for them to work together with your company instead; offering free services upfront can help strengthen negotiations after the initial meeting has taken place but before any contracts have been signed—and it could result in even better deals later on!
Know the difference between an agency and freelancer:
When you’re looking for a web design agency, the first thing to consider is whether or not you need one. If your business has been around for a while and has built up some momentum, then it might make sense to hire an agency. But if your company has only just started up or is still in its early stages of growth, hiring an agency could be too expensive for now. In this case, freelancers might be better-suited for what you need—they can provide cheaper rates than agencies but don’t have any experience or resources of their own (so they may not be able to do everything).
If money isn't an object when choosing between hiring someone full-time versus an agency partner then look at the experience and resources available with each option:
Do your research:
The first thing you should do is research the agency's portfolio. Look at their work, and see if it appeals to you. If it doesn't, move on. You can always come back later when you're ready to make a choice.
If the agency has a good portfolio on its website, check out their client list as well as any testimonials or reviews they've received from other clients (and make sure that they're genuine). Don't just rely on Google results either: go through industry forums or contacts in person! You'll get a better idea of what kind of people work there than by reading through some random blog post about how great Fredericton web design agency is at doing pixel perfect designs every time.
Finding the right Web Design Agency is important in helping you get your message out to customers and potential customers across the globe.
Choosing the right Web Design Agency is important in helping you get your message out to customers and potential customers across the globe. When working with an agency, they will help you create a unique brand identity that will attract more attention from potential customers. The right Web Design Agency can also help you develop effective marketing strategies that will help increase sales for your business as well as generate leads through social media platforms like Facebook or Twitter.
Conclusion
I hope that this article has helped you to understand how to find the right web design agency for your project. If you need more information about what it takes, please do not hesitate to contact us as we are the pro- fredericton web design agency ! We would love to help you get started on your business or website.
Here you can find our reference post: https://webdesigninfredericton.wordpress.com/2023/02/09/how-to-find-the-right-web-design-agency-tips/
0 notes
Text
A Semi-Stuctured Rant on Antishipping, Fujoshi Culture and the monetization of Homosexuality in Japanese and American Media
Antishippers are homophobic and it's bothering me. But also so are fujoshis and that bothers me too
Part One: Antishippers
Where there sails a ship ship so to the antishippers let fly their flags. A common argument I see painted on the bows of their warships is 'This character hasnt been stated as gay yet don't ship them with them.'
This is such a problematic sentence I don't even know where to begin. The fact that people view the default state of sexuality as 'straight until declared gay' creates the stigma that being homosexual is in some way deviant or taboo.
As an example: nobody has a problem with Todoroki being shipped with Momo despite them having minimal character interaction and very little shared dialogue in the show. Yet because they have been seen together in one (1) episode it has even been assumed canon on the same level as Izuku and Ochako which it quite simply is not.
Compare this to Bakugo and Kirishima who have several scenes together, most in even more intimate settings than Todoroki and Momo (study date, walking home at sunset together, the money scene, the rescue, I could go on) yet since the creator has not OUTRIGHT stated that either of these two are gay they have been assumed straight. Antishippers never go after TodoMomo in the same way they do KiriBaku.
I've seen people go as far as to say it would never happen, the creator would never do something so radical as to include one (1) gay couple. Despite the already pretty strong LGBTQ+ presence in the show with characters like Tiger, Big Sis Magne and Toga. These three have their own problems (an issue for another time) but they are there and that's a big step forward that people like to forget about.
Also, is the concept of 'we don't get good gay representation in the media so we write our own' really such a hard thing to grasp? Because it shouldn't be. Gay representation in media is scarce and even if its there it might not be handled sensitively (cough cough banana fish cough) and people naturally would want to go out of their way to provide it for themselves. Because representation is important. Straight, cis, white men really wouldn't understand because they are represented in literally everything all the time so I geuss they can't really fathom not being able look at the main character and go 'it me.' Which is why they put up such a fuss about every single time a woman is cast as the lead role. In anything. But I digress.
My point is basically this: Characters with undefined sexualities are obviously going to draw people in and be used as a comfortable, familiar and interesting starting point to create someone you can resonate with on a deeper level. Especially if there's nothing contradicting your head canon. And even if there is, who cares? There's plenty of straight characters already, representation is not pie and also they aren't real people so thats an extra helping of 'it shouldn't bother you.'
Oh I forgot to mention this rant only extends to fictional character antishippers because I think shipping real people is icky and shouldn't happen regardless of sexuality.
Part Two: Fujoshi Culture
Yes there are straight gals and guys that fetishise it (the male version is a fudanshi at least get it right people) and that's gross and unforgivable please stop doing it.
I would argue however this epidemic is caused by the fact that media, eastern and western alike, refuses to normalise gay relationships. Which means they see it as this sick fetish thing and call it 'sinning.' The literal terms fudanshi and fujoshi are derogatory and paint enjoying 'yaoi' as a guilty pleasure, something to be ashamed of and ridiculed.
And I'd bet my bottom dollar that Japan would want to keep it that way because it does work to sell their mangas.
Nagisa really sums up the whole issue in 50 percent off here's the clip:
https://youtu.be/c_xwtbrXbZM
youtube
Part Three: Western Focus
I just want to point out how half hearted and overly subtle these relationships have to be, like you're sneaking it past the republicans like the producers dirty little secret.
Good examples from both sides are Bubbeline, KoraSami, All of Voltron and Literally Any Gay Man In Anime Except Yuri on Ice. Although Yuri on Ice is still pretty coy about admitting that their characters are in a gay relationship.
KoraSami, Bubbeline and Shiro x Shiro's flashback buddy are all western depictions. Being gay in western media is much less commercialised and much less marketable, which is why the main issue with all of these were the writers pushing for something that was then only really confirmed either in: a very heavily fought for kiss last episode or the love story told entirely in (two bros chilling in a hot tub style) flashbacks where said love interest dies in the same episode. None of these are good representation and I don't think I have to spell out why.
Anyway this is another video that sums it up better than I can
https://youtu.be/TOj4WfQPNlk
youtube
Part 4: The Bad, The Worse and the Ugly
tw: s*xual a*sault mentioned (part 5 is safe)
I'll be quick
Anime like Banana Fish and Black Butler really like to perpetuate the stereotype that gay men are only gay because they have been r*ped by sick, twisted older men.
As a gay man who has been s*xually a*ssulted in the way that they like to pretend defined my sexuality I can say that this is insulting, triggering and Never. Ever. Handled. Properly. Anime has some issues with sexuality as a whole but it really takes the cake when characters like Ash are abused in real time in the anime and then it's used to 'justify' their promiscuity with men moving forward.
Banana Fish in no way handles the sexual assault tactfully, no matter what people have said to me.
This is an extract I agree with heavily from a pretty well written article (Banana Fish spoilers) :
I mentioned earlier the finale sent an awful message to new viewers. Ash’s story was about survival so for him to easily give up, in the end, sent a horrible message to survivors of sexual violence because it not only told them a moment of vulnerability would get them killed, but the only way survivors could find any peace was through death. The fact that Ash gave up, told survivors they could never escape from their traumas and despite all their efforts, they would never be able to heal from their abusive circumstances.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thatnerdyboliviane.com/2019/01/21/banana-fish-a-bittersweet-experience/amp/
'Kill your gays' is a bad trope in any case but really was an especially poor choice here.
Part 5: Sex Sells and Gay Sex Advertises
I've mentioned above how manga and anime likes to package gay relationships into problematic little bundles and sell it to straight women as a curiosity or oddity. But I really think that it needs to be talked about more. Things shouldn't be more interesting to you just because they're gay, and fetishising minorities is never okay in any context.
I think it's important to note that really the attitudes in both Western and Japanese media are actually the exact same. That being, Gay people are 'others' and should at all costs be hidden away into corners. The only real difference is that Japan is known for selling that kind of content, lumping it in the same category as tentacle hentai and... I don't know any other categories but the point stands. Whereas western media tends to just sequester it into a corner and hope it gets past censorship boards and Karen's. Money is at the forefront of both of these descisions.
It's a real problem that both sides of the anime culture are so problematic. One side is way too into it and the other can't begin to process it.
Here's a video by the same person that covers basically the same ground that's concerning me so much.
https://youtu.be/t3FKlqDocQ4
youtube
Part 6: In conclusion
I feel like this is something that is worth being angry about. I'm just sick of how being gay is treated at the moment in anime, tv and film, and how it's being received by straight audiences. The LGBTQ+ community barely seems to get a real say half of the time because people are too busy being head over heels that the author confirmed in an interview that a character is bi or gay but never follows through with it in universe. Or when you try and create content for yourself and get criticised like you were supposed to be happy about what little representation you get in mainstream media. Like shows do the bare minimum and then we're supposed to be happy about it. But I ain't. And I don't think many other people are either.
TLDR:
Gay people being treated like a taboo little secret on both sides of the issue is insulting and gross and never leads to anything good.
#Youtube#Gay#Anime#Shipping#Antishipping#bubbeline#voltron#my hero academia#legend of korra#fujoshi#Fudanshi#queerbaiting#rant post#lgbt pride#lgbtq#lgbt rights#banana fish#ash lynx#Yaoi#Yuri#lesbian#gay#bi#transgender#queer
0 notes
Text
Words fail us almost immediately when we try to discuss any kind of human behaviour, especially when those words are trying to create artificial categories or oppositions. Still, we need terminology, however imperfect, to create a common basis for explaining what we're talking about. This is an especially tricky problem in "queer history", because both what has historically been considered sexually and romantically non-normative and how those things were named and understood has varied so much – even, as you say, within the last fifty years.
'Queer' is one of those modern words that is both useful and hazardous to apply to the past – useful because it's a good shorthand umbrella term for a range of non-normative sexual and romantic acts or desires, hazardous because it's vague and anachronistic and requires us to have a good understanding of the historical context before we can begin to apply it. It's not a word I think I would use in formal academic writing, but it serves me here as a contrast to "normative", and allows me to sidestep the problem we have both mentioned of rigidly structured social categories.
In the same breath, we can end up getting so tangled in nuances and definitons and ahistoricity that we devote all our time to trying to define exactly what we mean (trying, also, not to offend anyone - impossible) and leave less space and time to focus on the actual human behaviours we came here to examine.
At some point, we just have to choose a word so that we can move to the next step, and 'queer' is the imperfect word I've chosen (at least, for the purposes of this Tumblr post).
I really should have defined this earlier, though. I'm using "queer" to mean "same-sex romantic or sexual desire that fell outside the normative bounds of social acceptability in the 18th century". That's not the only kind of queerness that existed (obviously), but that's my specific focus. The most common other words for this are "gay" (which comes with its own package of contemporary characteristics that I find unhelpful to understanding, and masks bisexuality) or homosexual (which privileges the "sex" part and thus doesn't help my core argument).
Now, as for what I meant about inherent queerness versus homosexuality above...
Two soldiers sharing a bunk and engaging in mutual masturbation, or sailors taking part in consensual sodomy aboard ship, are performing a homosexual act without necessarily feeling any particular same-sex attraction or desire (just like your closeted gay man having sex with his wife is not evidence of his heterosexual desire). The act itself might be transgressive, or illegal, and thus one might say it's "queer" on that basis – but equally we could argue that some degree of homosexual activity in these contexts was tolerated, so long as it stayed within acceptable and understood bounds. There are many great analyses out there on, e.g., sodomy among sailors that could make this point much better than I can.
On the other end of the spectrum we have people like Thomas Gray, Johann Wilhelm Ludwig Gleim and Johannes von Müller, who cultivated wide homosocial networks, and formed male-male friendships that they expounded on effusively, in deeply romantic language. There's no evidence of them engaging in homosexual acts, but their written works and behaviours signal their yearning for same-sex relationships (sexual or otherwise) that bordered on the socially transgressive – even if they themselves never transgressed those bounds. Contrast, also, the letters between George Washington and the Marquis de Lafayette on one hand, and Alexander Hamilton and John Laurens on the other. Both sets contain expressions of romantic affection, but the former is generally understood to take the style of a typical, normative romantic friendship, while the latter is increasingly accepted to be indicative of more transgressive – queer – same-sex desire.
And of course, all of these examples contain a degree of speculation and invite exceptions. There were certainly many homosexual men who joined the navy because it provided an outlet for their sexual desires, and homoromantic people who hid one-sided or mutual romantic love within the conventions of "regular" friendship.
Since we can't ever know exactly what any of these people really meant or felt, this is the point at which historians must shift to interpretation and analysis. Interpretations are not all equally valid, can and should evolve over time, and are always a function of our own biases, knowledge and access to evidence.
I don't think it's perpetuating harmful or oppressive structures to study queerness in historical context, inelegant though our language sometimes is. What does seem harmful and dated to me is requiring at least a suggestion of sexual desire (homoerotic) if not proof of sexual consummation (homosexual) before a relationship is considered "genuinely queer".
I have now rambled at length, and I'm not even sure I've properly addressed your question! But thanks nevertheless for the impetus to frame my thinking in more detail.
Homosocial – homoromantic – homoerotic – homosexual
A lot of people who talk about 18th century queerness treat these concepts as existing on a linear scale of "straight" to "gay", or as a progression of increasing queerness.
But that kind of framing isn't accurate. There's no line that we can draw here beyond which things become definitively queer. There were homosexual acts that had very little queerness to them, and homoromantic relationships that were fundamentally queer without ever (to our knowledge) straying beyond the emotional.
#queer history#i just think it's important not to get so paralysed by definitions that we can't even try our hand at analysis#and more than anything i want to escape the rigid categories/structures some people insist on (or themselves feel trapped in)#it's also difficult not to give in to defensiveness#since the weight of evidence some people demand before something can be “dared to be labelled queer” is frankly absurd#and comes down to the toxic mindset that queerness is somehow a negative or diminishing characteristic#or an accusation or diagnosis#so you need incontrovertible proof before you “tarnish” someone with a queer brush
70 notes
·
View notes