#(< just. pretend i rbed it instead of linking it here)

[sanguinewolves]

ok im not signed into my other acc on my phone and chances are im getting jailed relatively soon so im just gonna edit this post all day when i want to post

well. that cowboy hat jackles picture got me jailed

yk i like to think of myself as a really normal well adjusted guy

14x15 fucked w me a bit i think just bc i say skedaddle so often. so often. like its a Large part of my vocabulary. and now every time i say it justin!sam pops into my head 😔😔

pretend im reblogging this post https://www.tumblr.com/bloodydeanwinchester/724367207517274112

reblogging this https://www.tumblr.com/sauntering-vaguely-downwards/724367051448320000

I HAVE WORK. IN 7 MINUTES. AND THIS SHOWS UP IN MY NOTIFS https://www.tumblr.com/powerfulblob/724367997920231424/whos-dean-winchester

rbing this 20 times :) https://www.tumblr.com/transfagfrank/724336004544315392/hi-mutuals-we-should-all-hold-hands-forever

rbing this also. 5 times at least https://www.tumblr.com/transfagfrank/724331836684238848

[gender-critical-analytical]

you have no reason to try to be slick in my hashtags and why even reblog a post you clearly don’t agree with weirdo? she said what she said. women who are het paired and consider themselves feminist are quite literally the weakest link. they aren’t fighting for female liberation they are fighting to reform their boyfriends. stop acting like heterosexuality is under attack.

I do agree with the post, and the blog I rbed from added with her own tags, 'as long as it's a feminist critique', which I agreed with. Quite frankly, women who spend their time online deciding to call other women 'the weakest link' aren't too far from it themselves. All I see on her blog is her insulting women and name calling under the guise of activism, which I don't really think is fighting for female liberation either. I don't think heterosexuality is under attack, but I think a lot of people on radblr lack the ability to actually respect their fellow women the way they seem to think they do. If there's a woman who consistently brings up her boyfriend on radblr and allows that relationship to get in the way of discussion, then that's an issue, but random, unprompted cattiness towards women you feel superior towards is going to start conflict every time, and I'm sick of the same people who think het and bi women are pathetic or weak acting like they're doing so much for women as a class. You run a political blog, you haven't been dragging these women from the debris of wrecked buildings, only for them to slap you in the face and get carried off into the sunset by some man.

Het and bi women are always going to be some way involved in this community, and there are always going to be those of them who still choose to take the risk and date men. I already know I'm going to get people saying that that statement apparently means 'she thinks women NEED men to be fulfilled and happy!!1!' But that isn't what I think, nor is it what I've said. Some women want relationships with men, especially het women, in particular. Dating men certainly isn't a feminist action, but let's not pretend that it wipes away their entire ability to think critically and to care about women's liberation as a whole. Let's not act like we don't live in a society that has put constant emphasis on romantic relationships, and let's not pretend that romantic love and sex aren't things that are naturally desired for het women, and just about all women, for that matter. I agree that a huge part of contributing to any ideology you believe in is putting your money where your mouth is, and I think a lot of women in this community have come a long way from where they started, stopping the use of makeup and shaving, or consumption of pornography. But I really do think that expecting women to live their whole lives under a rule of celibacy is a lot to ask, and I don't think choosing not to do so is enough to counteract what they have to offer to radical feminism and other women. I fully believe that women can form meaningful and fulfilling relationships with other women, we can connect with one another on levels that men can never compare to, and sex isn't a need, these are all obvious truths. But none of us are pure, here. Every one of us has struggled against the patriarchy in some ways or another, and some of us still do. Some women on radblr still wear makeup, don't they? Some of us still shave, a lot of us still struggle with viewing ourselves in a voyeuristic lens, and some of us still have sexual and romantic desire for men, and none of those things ruin us or make us better or worse or dumber or smarter than one another. We're all able to empathize with other women in a broad sense, but so many of us can't seem to do it when it's one on one.

We can't respect eachother enough to not pick one another apart and divide ourselves into little groups and cliques. Whether you like it or not, we're here to advocate for one another. When those 'weak, pathetic' het women are harmed by their boyfriends or husbands, you're supposedly supposed to be someone safe to turn to. We all are, so for fucks sake, let's just bring back those posts for planning meet ups and actually figure out a way to do something for ourselves and other women, instead of playing silly little games of 'I'm better than you' on the internet. There's no fucking purity here, and that's the whole point. Sort out your damn issues instead of dictating which women are valuable and which aren't based on who they're fucking, thanks, because we all have something important to add to the discussion.