Crisis and Critique
What is critical theory, and whence the notion of critique as a practical stance towards the world? Using these questions as a point of departure, this course takes critical theory as its field of inquiry. Part of the course will be devoted to investigating what critique is, starting with the etymological and conceptual affinity it shares with crisis: since the Enlightenment, so one line of argument goes, all grounds for knowledge are subject to criticism, which is understood to generate a sense of escalating historical crisis culminating in a radical renewal of the intellectual and social order. We will explore the efficacy of modern critical thought, and the concept of critique’s efficacy, by examining a series of attempts to narrate and amplify states of crisis – and correspondingly transform key concepts such as self, will, time, and world – in order to provoke a transformation of society. The other part of the course will be oriented towards understanding current critical movements as part of the Enlightenment legacy of critique, and therefore as studies in the practical implications of critical readings. Key positions in critical discourse will be discussed with reference to the socio-political conditions of their formation and in the context of their provenance in the history of philosophy, literature, and cultural theory. Required readings will include works by Kant, Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Husserl, Benjamin and others, with suggested readings and references drawn from a variety of source materials ranging from literary and philosophical texts to visual images, film, and architecture. You are invited to work on your individual interests with respect to the readings.
Week 1
Critique, krinein, crisis (Koselleck, Adorno)
Required Reading
Reinhart Koselleck, “Crisis,” Journal of the History of Ideas 67.2 (2006), 357-400.
—, Chapters 7 and 8, Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1988 [German original, 1959].
Adorno and Horkheimer, "The Concept of Enlightenment," in Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. John Cumming (New York: Continuum, 1989), pp. 3-42.
Recommended Reading
Michel Foucault, “What is Enlightenment?” in The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books, 1984: 32-50.
—, The Politics of Truth. New York: Semiotext(e), 1997.
Friedrich Hölderlin, “Nature and Art or Saturn and Jupiter,” in Hyperion and Selected Poems. Ed. by Eric Santner. Translated by Michael Hamburger. New York: Continuum, 1990: 150-151.
Week 2
Judgment and Imagination (Kant)
Required Reading
Immanuel Kant, “Preface [A and B],” in Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998: 99-124.
—, “Preface” and “Introduction,” in Critique of Practical Reason, in Practical Philosophy, trans. Mary Gregor (Cambridge UP, 1996), pp. 139-149.
—, §§1-5, 59-60 of Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews (Cambridge UP, 2000), pp. 89-96, 225-230.
—, “Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose,” in Kant: Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991 (2nd ed.): 41-53, 273.
—, “An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? [1784],” in Practical Philosophy. Translated by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999: 11-22.
Recommended Reading
Immanuel Kant, "Analytic of the Sublime," in Critique of Judgment. Translated by James Creed Meredith; revised, edited, and introduced by Nicholas Walker. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007: 75-164.
Theodor Adorno, Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (2001 [1959])
Henry Allison, Kant’s Transcendental Idealism (2004)
Hannah Arendt, Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy (1992)
Geoffrey Bennington, “Kant’s Open Secret”, Theory, Culture and Society 28.7-8(2011): 26-40.
J.M. Bernstein, The Fate of Art: Aesthetic Alienation from Kant to Derrida and Adorno (1992)
Graham Bird, The Revolutionary Kant (2006)
Andrew Bowie, Aesthetics and Subjectivity: from Kant to Nietzsche (1990, 2003)
Howard Caygill, The Kant Dictionary (2000)
Ernst Cassirer, Kant's Life and Thought (1981)
Gilles Deleuze, Kant's Critical Philosophy (1984)
Will Dudley and Kristina Engelhard (eds.) Immanuel Kant: Key Concepts (2010)
Paul Guyer, Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays (2003)
Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (1997)
Laura Hengehold, The BODY Problematic: Political Imagination in Kant and Foucault (2007)
Otfried Höffe, Immanuel Kant (1994)
Jean-François Lyotard, L’Enthousiasme: La critique kantienne de l’histoire. Paris: L’Éditions Galilée, 1986.
Rudolf Makkreel, Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermaneutic Import of the Critique of Judgment (1990)
Jean-Luc Nancy, A Finite Thinking (2003)
Andrea Rehberg and Rachel Jones (eds.), The Matter of Critique: Readings in Kant’s Philosophy (2000)
Philip Rothfield (ed.), Kant after Derrida (2003)
Rei Terada, Looking Away: Phenomenality and Dissatisfaction, Kant to Adorno (2009)
Yirmiahu Yovel, Kant and the Philosophy of History (1989)
Week 3
Recognition and the Other (Hegel)
Required Reading
G.W.F. Hegel, “The Truth of Self-Certainty” and “Lordship and Bondage,” in The Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by Terry Pinkard. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2018: 102-116.
—, “The Art-Religion,” in The Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by Terry Pinkard. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2018: 403-430.
Recommended Reading
G.W.F. Hegel, Introduction [§§1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 8], in Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. Translated by T.M. Knox. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975: 1-14; 22-55; 69-90.
Stuart Barnett (ed.), Hegel after Derrida (2001)
Frederick Beiser (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel (1993)
Susan Buck-Morss, Hegel, Haiti, and Universal History (2009)
Rebecca Comay, Mourning Sickness: Hegel and the French Revolution (2011)
Rebecca Comay and John McCumber (eds.), Endings: Questions of Memory in Hegel and Heidegger (1999)
Eva Geulen, The End of Art: Readings in a Rumor after Hegel. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006.
Werner Hamacher, “(The End of Art with the Mask),” in Stuart Barnett (ed.), Hegel after Derrida. London and New York: Routledge, 1998: 105-130.
Werner Hamacher, “The Reader’s Supper: A Piece of Hegel,” trans. Timothy Bahti, diacritics 11.2 (1981): 52-67.
H.S. Harris, Hegel: Phenomenology and System (1995)
Stephen Houlgate, An Introduction to Hegel: Freedom, Truth and History (2005)
Stephen Houlgate, Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit (2013)
Fredric Jameson, The Hegel Variations (2010)
Alexandre Kojève, Introduction to the Reading of Hegel. Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1980.
Terry Pinkard, Hegel: A Biography (2001)
Week 4
Revolution … (Marx)
Required Reading
Karl Marx, “I: Feuerbach,” The German Ideology, in Collected Works vol. 5. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1976: 27-93.
Karl Marx, "Theses on Feuerbach," available online (http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/theses.htm)
Week 5
... and Repetition (Marx)
Required Reading
Karl Marx, “Preface” to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy [1859], in Collected Works vol. 29. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1976: 261-165.
—, “Postface to the Second Edition” and “Chapter 1: The Commodity,” in Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Trans. by B. Fowkes. London: Penguin, 1990: 95-103 and 125-177.
Recommended Reading
Louis Althusser, For Marx (1969)
Hannah Arendt, “Karl Marx and the Tradition of Western Political Thought”, Social Research 69.2 (2002): 273-319.
Étienne Balibar, The Philosophy of Marx (1995, 2007)
Ernst Bloch, On Karl Marx (1971)
Andrew Chitty and Martin McIvor (eds.), Karl Marx and Contemporary Philosophy (2009)
Simon Choat, Marx Through Post-Structuralism: Lyotard, Derrida, Foucault, Deleuze (2010)
Jacques Derrida, Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International. New York and London: Routledge, 1994.
Werner Hamacher, “Lingua Amissa: The Messianism of Commodity-Language and Derrida’s Specters of Marx” (1999)
Jean Hyppolite, Studies on Marx and Hegel (1969)
Sarah Kofman, Camera Obscura: Of Ideology (1998)
Peter Singer, Marx: A Very Short Introduction (1980)
Michael Sprinker (ed.), Ghostly Demarcations: A Symposium on Jacques Derrida’s Specters of Marx (1999, 2008)
Moishe Postone, History and Heteronomy: Critical Essays (2009)
Moishe Postone, Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory (1993)
Jacques Rancière, “The Concept of ‘Critique’ and the ‘Critique of Political Economy’ (from the 1844 Manuscript to Capital)”, Economy and Society 5.3 (1976): 352-376.
Tom Rockmore, Marx After Marxism: The Philosophy of Karl Marx (2002)
Gareth Stedman-Jones, Karl Marx: Greatness and Illusion (2016)
Week 6
Tutorial Week
Week 7
Will to Becoming Otherwise (Nietzsche)
Required Reading
Friedrich Nietzsche, "Preface" and "First Treatise," in On the Genealogy of Morality. Trans. by Maudemarie Clark and Alan J. Swensen. Indianopolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 1998: 1-33.
Week 8
Ascetic Ideal and Eternal Return (Nietzsche)
Required Reading
Friedrich Nietzsche, "Second Treatise" and "Third Treatise," in On the Genealogy of Morality. Trans. by Maudemarie Clark and Alan J. Swensen. Indianopolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 1998: 35-118.
Recommended Reading
Friedrich Nietzsche, §§341-342 of The Gay Science
Friedrich Nietzsche, “On Vision and Riddle” and “The Convalescent,” in Thus Spake Zarathustra III
Friedrich Nietzsche, “On Truth and Lying in a Non-Moral Sense,” in: The Birth of Tragedy and other writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Friedrich Nietzsche, “On the Uses and Abuses of History for Life,” in: Untimely Meditations. Trans. by R.J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Gilles Deleuze, Nietzsche and Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006.
Jacques Derrida, Spurs: Nietzsche’s Styles. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1979.
Michel Foucault, "Nietzsche, Genealogy, History," in Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ed. by D. F. Bouchard. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977: 139-164.
R. Kevin Hill, Nietzsche’s Critiques: The Kantian Foundations of his Thought (2003)
Luce Irigaray, Marine Lover of Friedrich Nietzsche. Trans. by Gillian C. Gill. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.
Jean-Francois Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
Gianni Vattimo, The End of Modernity: Nihilism and Hermeneutics in Postmodern Culture. Trans. by Jon R. Snyder. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988.
Alenka Zupančič, The Shortest Shadow: Nietzsche’s Philosophy of the Two (2003)
Week 9
Repetition Compulsion (Freud)
Required Reading
Sigmund Freud, “Beyond the Pleasure Principle” [excerpts], in Peter Gay (ed.), The Freud Reader. London: Vintage, 1995: 594-625.
Recommended Reading
Theodor Adorno, “Revisionist Psychoanalysis,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 40.3 (2014): 326-338.
Louis Althusser, Writings on Psychoanalysis: Freud and Lacan (1996)
Lauren Berlant, Desire/Love (2012)
Leo Bersani, The Freudian Body: Psychoanalysis and Art (1986)
Rebecca Comay, “Resistance and Repetition: Freud and Hegel,” Research in Phenomenology 45 (2015): 237-266.
Jacques Derrida, Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression (1995)
Jacques Derrida, The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond (1987)
Mladen Dolar, “Freud and the Political,” Unbound 4.15 (2008): 15-29.
Sarah Kofman, Freud and Fiction (1991)
Jacques Lacan, “The Agency of the Letter in the Unconscious; or Reason after Freud”, in Écrits: A Selection. Trans. by A. Sheridan. New York: Norton, 1977: 146-175.
Catherine Malabou, “Plasticity and Elasticity in Freud’s Beyond the Pleasure Principle.” Diacritics 37.4 (2007): 78-85.
Jean-Luc Nancy, "System of (Kantian) Pleasure (With a Freudian Postscript)," in Kant after Derrida. Ed. by Phil Rothfield. Manchester: Clinamen Press, 2003: 127-141.
Angus Nicholls and Martin Liebscher (eds.), Thinking the Unconscious: Nineteenth-Century German Thought (2010)
Charles Sheperdson, Vital Signs: Nature, Culture, Psychoanalysis (2000)
Samuel Weber, The Legend of Freud. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000.
Alenka Zupančič, Ethics of the Real: Kant and Lacan. London: Verso, 2012 [reprint].
Week 10
Crisis of European Humankind (Husserl)
Required Reading
Edmund Husserl, §§1-7 and §§10-21, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Trans. by David Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970: 2-18; 60-84.
Recommended Reading
Edmund Husserl, “Philosophy and the Crisis of European Humanity [Vienna Lecture],” in The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Trans. by David Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970: 269-299.
Jacques Derrida, The Other Heading: Reflections on Today’s Europe. Trans. by Pascale Anne Brault and Michael B. Naas. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992: 4-83.
Paul de Man, “Criticism and Crisis,” in Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1971: 3-19.
James Dodd, Crisis and Reflection: An Essay on Husserl’s Crisis of the European Sciences (2004)
Burt C. Hopkins, The Philosophy of Husserl (2011)
David Hyder and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, Science and the Life-World: Essays on Husserl’s Crisis of European Sciences (2010)
Leonard Lawlor, Derrida and Husserl: The Basic Problem of Phenomenology (2002)
Dermot Moran, The Husserl Dictionary (2012)
Paul Valéry, "Notes on the Greatness and Decline of Europe” and “The European,” in History and Politics. Trans. Denise Folliot and Jackson Matthews. New York: Bollingen, 1962: 228; 311-12.
David Woodruff Smith, Husserl (2007)
Barry Smith and David Woodruff Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Husserl (1995)
Week 11
Crisis-Proof Experience (Benjamin)
Required Reading
Walter Benjamin, “On Some Motifs in Baudelaire,” in Selected Writings vol. 4. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2003: 313-355.
Recommended Reading
Walter Benjamin, "Experience and Poverty"
—, "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproducibility”
—, “Theses on the Concept of History”
—, “Epistemo-Critical Prologue,” in The Origin of German Tragic Drama. Trans. by John Osborne. London and New York: Verso, 2003: 27-56.
—, “Convolute J,” The Arcades Project
—, The Writer of Modern Life: Essays on Charles Baudelaire (2006)
Benjamin and Theodor Adorno, “Exchange with Theodor W. Adorno on ‘The Paris of the Second Empire in Baudelaire,” in Benjamin, Selected Writings vol. 4 (1999).
Charles Baudelaire, The Flowers of Evil; The Painter of Modern Life
Ian Balfour, “Reversal, Quotation (Benjamin’s History)”, Modern Language Notes 106.3 (1991): 622-647.
Eduardo Cadava, Words of Light: Theses on the Photography of History (1997)
Tom Gunning, “The Exterior as Intérieur: Benjamin’s Optical Detective,” boundary 2 30.1 (2003).
Werner Hamacher, “Now: Benjamin on Historical Time” (2001; 2005)
General Background
Julian Wolfreys (ed.), Modern European Criticism and Theory: A Critical Guide (2006)
Simon Critchley, Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction (2001)
Terry Pinkard, German Philosophy 1760-1860: The Legacy of Idealism (2002)
Andrew Bowie, Introduction to German Philosophy: From Kant to Habermas (2003)
Kai Hammermeister, The German Aesthetic Tradition (2002)
Gary Gutting, French Philosophy in the Twentieth Century (2001)
Eric Matthews, Twentieth-Century French Philosophy (1996)
Jonathan Simons (ed.), From Kant to Lévi-Strauss: The Background to Contemporary Critical Theory (2002)
Learning Outcomes
- You will have a grasp of the broad trends in the development of critical theory.
- You will have a good understanding of how different modern philosophical traditions from German Idealism to Phenomenology inform the different strains of critical theory.
- You will be able to expound and analyse the ways in which a range of different writers and tendencies in the history of modern thought conceive of the specificity of critique.
- You will have a sound grasp of the primary and secondary literatures in critical theory, both on general issues and specific thinkers or schools.
- You will be able to use the ideas and texts explored in the module to inform your readings in critical theoretical texts.
Assessment Criteria
- Students should show a clear command of how their chosen thinker(s) and texts relate to the broader trajectories of critical theory.
- Students should show a detailed critical knowledge of at least two of the module’s key thinkers or theoretical tendencies.
- Students should show a knowledge and capacity to use a good range of secondary literature on both general issues in the field and on the specific thinkers and texts they address.
- Students should be able to read the relevant texts from both critical and genealogical perspectives.
- Students should demonstrate their capacity to develop a distinctive and coherent interpretative and analytical perspective on their chosen subject.
16 notes
·
View notes
Machine Movement Lab
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2020.577900/full
The Esthetics of Encounter: A Relational-Performative Design Approach to Human-Robot Interaction
Petra Gemeinboeck
Department of Media Theory, University of Applied Arts Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Centre for Transformative Media Technologies, School of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
This article lays out the framework for relational-performative esthetics in human-robot interaction, comprising a theoretical lens and design approach for critical practice-based inquiries into embodied meaning-making in human-robot interaction. I explore the centrality of esthetics as a practice of embodied meaning-making by drawing on my arts-led, performance-based approach to human-robot encounters, as well as other artistic practices. Understanding social agency and meaning as being enacted through the situated dynamics of the interaction, I bring into focus a process of bodying-thinging; entangling and transforming subjects and objects in the encounter and rendering elastic boundaries in-between. Rather than serving to make the strange look more familiar, aesthetics here is about rendering the differences between humans and robots more relational....
References
Airenti, G. (2015). The cognitive bases of anthropomorphism: from relatedness to empathy. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7, 117–127. doi:10.1007/s12369-014-0263-x
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Alač, M. (2015). Social robots: things or agents?. AI Soc. 31 (1), 519–535. doi:10.1007/s00146-015-0631-6
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Alač, M. (2011). When a robot is social: spatial arrangements and multimodal semiotic engagement in the practice of social robotics. Soc. Stud. Sci. 41 (6), 893–926. doi:10.1177/0306312711420565
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Alexander, T. (2013). The human eros: eco-ontology and the aesthetics of existence. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Aviv, V. (2017). Abstracting dance: detaching ourselves from the habitual perception of the moving body. Front. Psychol. 8, 776. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00776
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Bal, M. (2015). “Documenting what? Auto-theory and migratory aesthetics,” in A companion to contemporary documentary film. Editors A. Juhasz and A. Lebow (NJ: Hoboken), 124–144. doi:10.1002/9781118884584.ch6
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs. 28 (3), 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Bartenieff, I., and Dori, L. (1980). Body movement; coping with the environment. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2012). Practical aesthetics events: affects and art after 9/11. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Bianchini, S., and Quinz, E. (2016). “Behavioral objects: a case study,” in In behavioral objects 1—a case study: celeste boursier-mougenot. Editors S. Bianchini, and E. Quinz (Berlin, DE: Sternberg Press), 5–28.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Billard, A., Calinon, S., Dillmann, R., and Schaal, S. (2008). “Robot programming by demonstration,” in In springer handbook of robotics. Editors B. Siciliano, and O. Khatib (Berlin, DE: Springer-Verlag), 1371–1394.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Boer, L., and Bewley, H. (2018). “Reconfiguring the appearance and expression of social robots by acknowledging their otherness,” in Proceedings of the 2018 designing interactive systems conference. (New York, NY: ACM), 667–677. doi:10.1145/3196709.3196743
Bombari, D., Schmid Mast, M., Canadas, E., and Bachmann, M. (2015). Studying social interactions through immersive virtual environment technology: virtues, pitfalls, and future challenges. Front. Psychol. 6, 869–911. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00869
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Breazeal, C., Brooks, A., Gray, J., Hancher, M., McBean, J., Stiehl, D., et al. (2003). Interactive robot theatre. Commun. ACM. 46 (7), 76–85. doi:10.1145/792704.792733
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Brunete, A., Ranganath, A., Segovia, S., de Frutos, J. P., Hernando, M., and Gambao, E. (2017). Current trends in reconfigurable modular robots design. Int. J. Adv. Rob. Syst. 14 (3), 1–21. doi:10.1177/1729881417710457
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Castañeda, C., and Suchman, L. (2014). Robot visions. Soc. Stud. Sci. 44 (3), 315–341. doi:10.1177/0306312713511868
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Dautenhahn, K. (2013). “Human-robot interaction,” in In Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Editors M. Soegaard, R. F. D. Dam, and K. Aarhus. 2nd Edn (Aarhus, Denmark: Interaction Design Foundation), 2283–2366.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Dautenhahn, K., Nehaniv, C., and Alissandrakis, A. (2003). “Learning by experience from others—social learning and imitation in animals and robots,” in Adaptivity and learning: an interdisciplinary debate. Editors R. Kühn, R. Menzel, W. Menzel, U. Ratsch, M. Richter, and I. Stamatescu (Berlin, Germany: Springer), 217–421.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
De Graaf, M. M., and Allouch, S. B. (2013). Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Robot. Autonom. Syst. 61 (12), 1476–1486. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2013.07.007
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
De Jaegher, H., Pieper, B., Clénin, D., and Fuchs, T. (2017). Grasping intersubjectivity: an invitation to embody social interaction research. Phenomenol. Cognitive Sci. 16, 491–523. doi:10.1007/s11097-016-9469-8
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Demers, L.-P. (2016). “The multiple bodies of a machine performer,” in Robots and art: exploring an unlikely symbiosis. Editors H. Damith, K. Christian, and Stelarc (Singapore, SG: Springer), 273–306. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-0321-9_14
Despret, V. (2013). Responding bodies and partial affinities in human-animal worlds. Theor. Cult. Soc. 30 (7-8), 51–76. doi:10.1177/0263276413496852
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. J. Philos. 31 (10), 275–276.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Di Paolo, E., Rohde, M., and De Jaegher, H. (2010). “Horizons for the enactive mind: values, social interaction, and play,” in Enaction: towards a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Editors J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, and E. Di Paolo (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 33–87.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Dimitrova, Z. (2017). Robotic performance: an ecology of response. Performance Philosophy. 3 (1), 162–177. doi:10.21476/PP.2017.3135
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Dourish, P. (2001). Where the Action is. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Eckersall, P., Grehan, H., and Scheer, E. (2017). New media dramaturgy: performance, media and new-materialism. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Fischer-Lichte, E. (2008). The transformative power of performance: a new aesthetics. Oxford, United Kingdom: Routledge.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Foster, S. L. (2000). “Foreword,” in My body the buddhist. Editor D. Hay (Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press).
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Frauenberger, C. (2019). Entanglement HCI the next wave? ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 27 (1), 1–27. doi:10.1145/3364998
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Froese, T., and Fuchs, T. (2012). The extended body: a case study in the neuro-phenomenology of social interaction. Phenomenol. Cognitive Sci. 11, 205–236. doi:10.1007/s11097-012-9254-2
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Fuchs, T., and Koch, S. (2014). Embodied affectivity: on moving and being moved. Front. Psychol. 5 (3), 508–512. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00508
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2016). “Intercorporeality and interaffectivity,” in Intercorporeality: emerging socialities in interaction. Editors C. Meyer, J. Streeck, and S. Jordan (Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.003.0001
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Gamble, C. N., Hanan, J. S., and Nail, T. (2019). What is new materialism? Angelaki. 24 (6), 111–134. doi:10.1080/0969725X.2019.1684704
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Gemeinboeck, P. (2019). “Dancing with the nonhuman,” in Thinking in the world. Editors J. Bennett, and M. Zournazi (London, United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Academic), 214–239.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Gemeinboeck, P., and Saunders, R. (2019). “Exploring social co-presence through movement in human robot encounters,” in Proceeding of the AISB 2019 Symposium on Movement that shapes behaviour, Falmouth, United Kingdom, April 2019. http://aisb2019.machinemovementlab.net/MTSB2019_Gemeinboeck_Saunders.pdf (Accessed June 20 2020).
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Gemeinboeck, P., and Saunders, R. (2018). “Human-robot kinesthetics: mediating kinesthetic experience for designing affective non-humanlike social robots,” in Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE RO-MAN: the 27th IEEE International Conference on Robot and human interactive communication. New York, NY: IEEE, 571–576. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525596
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Gemeinboeck, P., and Saunders, R. (2017). Movement matters: how a robot becomes body. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing (MOCO’17), London United Kingdom, June, 2017, 1–8.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Gemeinboeck, P., and Saunders, R. (2016a). “The performance of creative machines,” in In cultural robotics. CR 2015. Lecture notes in computer science 9549. Editors J.T. K. V. Koh, B. J. Dunstan, D. Silvera-Tawil, and M. Velonaki. (Cham, Switzerland: Springer), 159–172. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42945-8_13
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Gemeinboeck, P., and Saunders, R. (2016b). “Towards socializing non-anthropomorphic robots by harnessing dancers’ kinesthetic awareness,” in In cultural robotics. CR 2015. Lecture notes in computer science 9549. Editors J.T. K. V. Koh, B. J. Dunstan, D. Silvera-Tawil, and M. Velonaki (Cham, Switzerland: Springer), 85–97. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42945-8_8
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J. (1963). Perceptual learning. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 14, 29–56. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.14.020163.000333
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1989). Primate visions: gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. New York, NY: Routledge.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became Posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and Informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Hegel, F., Muhl, C., Wrede, B., Hielscher-Fastabend, M., and Sagerer, G. (2009). “Understanding social robots,” in Proceedings of the Second International Conferences on Advances in computer-human interaction, Cancun, Mexico, February 2009. New York, NY: IEEE, 169–174.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Hegel, F. (2012). “Effects of a robot’s aesthetic design on the attribution of social capabilities,” in Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: the 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and human interactive communication, Paris, France, September 2012. New York, NY: IEEE, 469–475. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343796
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Hoffman, G., and Ju, W. (2014). Designing robots with movement in mind. JHRI., 3, 89–122. doi:10.5898/JHRI.3.1
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Hoffman, G., and Weinberg, G. (2011). Interactive improvisation with a robotic marimba player. Aut. Robots. 31 (2–3), 133–153. doi:10.1007/s10514-011-9237-0
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Hylving, L. (2017). Sociomaterial quasi-objects: from interface to experience. AIS Trans. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 9 (3), 202–219. doi:10.17705/1thci.00095
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Jochum, E., and Goldberg, K. (2016). “Cultivating the uncanny: the Telegarden and other oddities,” in In Robots and art: Exploring an unlikely symbiosis. Editors D. Herath, C. Kroos, and Stelarc (Singapore: Springer), 149–175.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Jochum, E., Millar, P., and Nuñez, D. (2017). Sequence and chance: design and control methods for entertainment robots. Robot. Autonom. Syst. 87, 372–380. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.019
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Jochum, E., Vlachos, E., Christoffersen, A., Nielsen, S., Grindsted, H., and Ibrahim, A. (2016). Using theatre to study interaction with care robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 8 (4), 457–470. doi:10.1007/s12369-016-0370-y
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (2018). The aesthetics of meaning and thought: the bodily Roots of philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Jones, R. A. (2018). “Human-robot relationships,” in In posthumanism: the Future of Homo sapiens. Editors M. Bess, and D. W. Pasulka (Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan), 365–375.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Jones, R. A. (2017). What makes a robot “social”? Soc. Stud. Sci. 47 (4), 556–579. doi:10.1177/0306312717704722
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J. (2019). Constructing soft robot aesthetics: art, sensation, and Materiality in practice. PhD thesis. Copenhagen, Denmark: IT University of CopenhagenAvailable at: https://pure.itu.dk/portal/files/84722485/PhD_Thesis_Final_Version_Jonas_J_rgensen.pdf ( Accessed October 11, 2020).
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Kac, E. (1997). Foundation and development of robotic art. Art J. 56 (3), 60–67. doi:10.1080/00043249.1997.10791834
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Karg, M., Samadani, A. A., Gorbet, R., Kühnlenz, K., Hoey, J., and Kulić, D. (2013). Body movements for affective expression: a survey of automatic recognition and generation. IEEE Trans. Affective Comput. 4 (4), 341–359. doi:10.1109/T-AFFC.2013.29
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Knight, H., and Simmons, R. G. (2014). “Expressive motion with x, y and theta: Laban Effort Features for mobile robots,” in Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE RO-MAN: 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication. (New York, NY: IEEE), 267–273. doi:10.1109/roman.2014.6926264
Koch, S. C. (2014). Rhythm is it: effects of dynamic body feedback on affect and attitudes. Front. Psychol. 5 (3), 537–611. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00537
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Kroos, C., Herath, D.C., and Stelarc, (2012). Evoking agency: attention model and behavior control in a robotic art installation. Leonardo 45 (5), 401–407. doi:10.1162/leon_a_00435
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Laban, R. (1972). “The Mastery of movement.” Revised and enlarged by lisa ullmann. 3rd Edn. Boston, MA: PLAYS Inc..
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Lasseter, J. (2001). Tricks to animating characters with a computer. ACM Siggraph Computer Graphics. 35 (2), 45–47. doi:10.1145/563693.563706
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
LaViers, A., Cuan, C., Maguire, C., Bradley, K., Mata, K. B., Nilles, A., et al. (2018). Choreographic and somatic approaches for the development of expressive robotic systems. Arts. 7 (2), 1–21. doi:10.3390/arts7020011
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Leach, J., and deLahunta, S. (2017). Dance becoming knowledge: designing a digital “body”. Leonardo. 50 (5), 461–467. doi:10.1162/LEON_a_01074
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Lee, H. R., Šabanović, S., and Stolterman, E. (2016). “How humanlike should a social robot be: a user-centered exploration,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Enabling Computing Research in Socially Intelligent Human-Robot Interaction. (Palo Alto, CA: AAAI), 135–141. Available at: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/SSS/SSS16/paper/viewFile/12751/11934 (Accessed October 10, 2020).
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Levillain, F., and Zibetti, E. (2017). Behavioural objects: the rise of the evocative machines. JHRI. 6 (1), 4–24. doi:10.5898/JHRI.6.1.Levillain
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Lindblom, J. (2020). A radical reassessment of the body in social cognition. Front. Psychol. 11, 987. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00987
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Lindblom, J., and Alenljung, B. (2020). The ANEMONE: theoretical foundations for UX evaluation of action and intention recognition in human-robot interaction. Sensors. 20 (15), 4284. doi:10.3390/s20154284
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Lindblom, J. (2015). Embodied social cognition. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Lindblom, J., and Ziemke, T. (2003). Social situatedness of natural and artificial intelligence: vygotsky and beyond. Adapt. Behav. 2003 (11), 79–96. doi:10.1177/10597123030112002
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Maher, M. L., Merrick, K., and Saunders, R. (2008). “Achieving creative behaviour using curious learning agents,” in AAAI spring symposium: creative intelligent systems’08, technical report SS-08-03. Editors D. Ventura, M. L. Maher, and S. Colton (Stanford, CA: AAAI)), 40–46.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind: a theory of material engagement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Manning, E., and Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Mindell, D. A. (2015). Our robots, ourselves: robotics and the myths of autonomy. New York, NY: Viking.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Meier, B. P., Schnall, S., Schwarz, N., and Bargh, J. A. (2012). Embodiment in social psychology. Top Cogn Sci. 4 (4), 705–716. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01212.x
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Noë, A. (2009). Out of our heads: why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Noland, C. (2009). “Coping and choreography,” in Proceeding of the Digital Arts and culture 2009 (DAC 09). Irvine, CA, December, 2009, UC Irvine. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0gq729xq (Accessed April 17, 2020).
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Osborne, H. (1986). Interpretation in science and in art. Br. J. Aesthet. 26 (1), 3–15. doi:10.1093/bjaesthetics/26.1.3
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Paauwe, R. A., Hoorn, J. F., Konijn, E. A., and Keyson, D. V. (2015). Designing robot embodiments for social interaction: affordances topple realism and aesthetics. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7, 697–708. doi:10.1007/s12369-015-0301-3
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Penny, S. (2000). “Agents as artworks: and agent design as artistic practice,” in Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology. Editor K. Dautenhahn (Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishing Company), 395–414. doi:10.1075/aicr.19
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Penny, S. (2017). Making sense: cognition, computing, art, and embodiment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Penny, S. (2016). “Robotics and art, computationalism and embodiment,” in In Robots and art: Exploring an unlikely symbiosis. Editors H. Damith, and K. Christian (Singapore: Springer), 47–65.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Penny, S. (2011). Towards a performative aesthetic of interactivity. Fibreculture J. 19, 72–108.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Pfeifer, R., and Scheier, C. (1999). Understanding intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Piris, P. (2014). “The Co-presence and ontological ambiguity of the puppet,” in The routledge companion to puppet theatre. Editors D. N. Posner, C. Orenstein, and J. Bell. (London, United Kingdom: Routledge), 30–42. doi:10.4324/9781315850115.ch2
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Popat, S. H., and Palmer, S. D. (2005). Creating common ground: dialogues between performance and digital technologies. Int. J. Perform. Art. Digit. Media. 1 (1), 47–65. doi:10.1386/padm.1.1.47/1
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Rietveld, E., and Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecol. Psychol. 26 (4), 325–352. doi:10.1080/10407413.2014.958035
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Šabanović, S. (2010). Robots in society, society in robots: mutual shaping of society and technology as a framework for social robot design. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2 (4), 439–450. doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0066-7
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Salvini, P., Laschi, C., and Dario, P. (2010). Design for acceptability: improving robots’ coexistence in human society. Int. J. Soc. Robot., 2, 451–460. doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0079-2
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Sandry, E. (2016). “The potential of otherness in robotic art,” in Robots and Art: Exploring an Unlikely Symbiosis. Editors H. Damith, and K. Christian (Singapore: Springer), 177–189.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Saunders, R., and Gemeinboeck, P. (2018). “Performative Body Mapping for designing expressive robots.” In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computational Creativity (Coimbra, PT: ACC), Salamanca, Spain, June, 2018, 280–287.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Schleicher, D., Jones, P., and Kachur, O. (2010). Bodystorming as Embodied Designing. Interactions. 17 (6), 47–51. doi:10.1145/1865245.1865256
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2010). Kinesthetic experience: understanding movement inside and out. Body Movement Dance Psychother. 2, 111–127. doi:10.1080/17432979.2010.496221
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2012). From movement to dance. Phenom. Cogn. Sci. 11, 39–57. doi:10.1007/s11097-011-9200-8
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2011). “The primacy of movement.,” in Series on advances in consciousness research 14. 2nd Edition (Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company). doi:10.1075/aicr.14
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Sirkin, D., Mok, B., Yang, S., Maheshwari, R., and Ju, W. (2016). “Improving design thinking through collaborative improvisation” in Design thinking research., 93–108. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19641-1_7
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
St-Onge, D., Levillain, F., Zibetti, E., and Beltrame, G. (2019). Collective expression: how robotic swarms convey information with group motion. Paladyn. J. Behav. Rob. 10, 418–435. doi:10.1515/pjbr-2019-0033
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Stacey, J., and Suchman, L. (2012). Animation and automation: the liveliness and labours of bodies and machines. Body Soc. 18 (1), 1–46. doi:10.1177/1357034X11431845
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated action: the problem of human–machine communication. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Suchman, L. (2007a). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. 2nd Edn. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Suchman, L. (2007b). “Agencies in technology design: feminist reconfigurations” in hackett,” in The handbook of science and technology studies. Editors O. Amsterdamska, M.E. Lynch, and J. Wajcman. 3rd Edn (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Suchman, L. (2011). Subject objects. Fem. Theor. 12 (2), 119–145. doi:10.1177/1464700111404205
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Suschke, S. (2003). Müller macht Theater: Zehn Inszenierungen und ein Epilog. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Turkle, S. (2005). The second self: computers and the human spirit. 20th Edn. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Uexküll, J. V. (1957). “A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: a picture book of invisible worlds,” in Instinctive behavior: the Development of a modern concept. Editor C. H. Schiller (New York, NY: International Universities Press), 5–80.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Vlachos, E., Jochum, E., and Demers, L.-P. (2016). The effects of exposure to different social robots on attitudes toward preferences. Interaction Studies 17 (3), 390–404. doi:10.1075/is.17.3.04vla
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Wright, P. (2011). Reconsidering the H, the C, and the I: some thoughts on reading suchman’s human-machine reconfigurations. Interactions. 18 (5), 28–31. doi:10.1145/2008176.2008185
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Yang, S., Mok, B. K.-J., SirkinIve, D. H. P., Maheshwari, R., Fischer, K., and Ju, W. (2015). “Experiences developing socially acceptable interactions for a robotic trash barrel,” in The 24th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, Kobe, Japan, August, 2015 (New York, NY: IEEE), 277–284. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333693
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Ziemke, T. (2002). Introduction to the special issue on situated and embodied cognition. Cognit. Syst. Res. 3, 271–274. doi:10.1016/S1389-0417(02)00068-2
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Ziemke, T., and Sharkey, N. (2001). A stroll through the worlds of robots and animals. Semiotica. 13 (1–4), 701–746. doi:10.1515/semi.2001.050
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Ziemke, T. (2016). The body of knowledge: on the role of the living body in grounding embodied cognition. Biosystems. 148, 4–11. doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2016.08.005
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Zivanovic, A. (2019). “Elegant, natural motion of robots: lessons from an artist” in Gemeinboeck,” in Proceedings of the AISB 2019 Symposium on Movement that shapes behaviour (MTSB’19). Editors P. Gemeinboeck, and R. Saunders. Available at: http://aisb2019.machinemovementlab.net/MTSB2019_Proceedings.pdf (Accessed June 21 2020).
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Keywords: human-robot interaction design, aesthetics, performativity, agency, design, movement
Citation: Gemeinboeck P (2021) The Esthetics of Encounter: A Relational-Performative Design Approach to Human-Robot Interaction. Front. Robot. AI 7:577900. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.577900
Received: 30 June 2020; Accepted: 14 December 2020;
Published: 16 March 2021.
Edited by:
Elizabeth Ann Jochum
, Aalborg University, Denmark
Reviewed by:
Gregory J. Corness
, Columbia College Chicago, United States
Jonas Jørgensen
, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
Copyright © 2021 Gemeinboeck. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Add
3 notes
·
View notes