#‘why was luke literally an evil supervillain in som but became more sympathetic in ttc-tlo’
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
It always gives me the ick when y’all try to say there’s a specific book canon, especially concerning only the show, because that’s not true. The “book canon” has been changing since literally the very beginning of the series. From tlt to som, Rick changed so many things not just about the lore in his universe but the characters too. He did it from PJO to HOO as well. This is a consistent writing pattern of his where he changes physical and personality traits of his characters depending on his whims and that’s just the way the pjo verse is. This is why the whole “book canon” vs “show canon” thing does not make any sense because firstly, the books are like 50 steps ahead of the show. The show characters are literally in the first book phase of their character arcs and it’s relatively the same other than minor plot changes. And secondly, the books have so many conflicting character moments for all of the characters that the fandom was having arguments about what was book canon long before the show was even announced.
while i love and adore the new percy jackson trilogy so far, i have to admit that i am both disappointed and a little upset at the mischaracterisation of the characters, specifically the main trio. percy, annabeth, and grover, are no longer percy, annabeth, and grover. not their book versions, anyway.
i know that rick has said this before; that he is writing these characters now with the actors in mind, and i do understand that, but it’s not working. the books and the show are two very different things. while both are wonderful and i love them (and the movies!!), they are different. and that is okay.
but yes, there are so many moments (more in wrath of the triple goddess than in the chalice of the gods i think) especially regarding percabeth, where it just… isn’t. that isn’t my percabeth. it’s a weird mix of book canon and show characteristics, and it’s just a mess when you do that.
i love and respect rick riordan with all my heart, and i am not in any way against him or his writing, but i don’t think that the way he is writing these new book is even remotely a good decision. i think it needs to be changed. book canon should be remaining book canon, and the show versions portrayed by walker, leah, and aryan should remain their portrayals. (which are incredible, they are perfect for their roles but they can never be the book versions. they are different).
#like im sorry what are we talking about here???#if you don’t like the way the characters are written in the new trilogy i really don’t see how you can even blame it on the show when rick#has literally been doing this type of thing from the very fucking beginning#like do we not remember the entire ‘would annabeth judoflip percy’ conversation that the entire fandom STILL has to this day#the whole ‘percy is a himbo vs percy is actually really smart and dangerous’ thing that’s been around forever#‘why was luke literally an evil supervillain in som but became more sympathetic in ttc-tlo’#and it’s literally all because rick’s mo is writing whatever tf he wants to write even if it doesn’t align with previously established canon#if anything this newer trilogy is actually a return to some of the og characteristics and id argue it’s because he’s revisiting#the og books for the show#and honestly i just hate how this fandom approaches adaption in such rigid ways#“THE SHOW AND BOOK CANON IS COMPLETELY SEPERATE AND NOT THE SAME AND THEY ARE DIFFERENT’#but a good adaptation entails being in conversation with the source material and figuring out how one affects the other so when the two#blend together for people it’s actually a Good Thing#and it makes me wonder why you guys are so hellbent on saying the actors will never be the book characters#pjotv#pjo tv show#pjo
341 notes
·
View notes