#‘all health insurance ceo’s deserve to die’ to ‘idk if health insurance employees get caught in the crossfire of an assasination attempt’

[afrenomes]

It is very unlikely to have anything to do with the assassination, especially given that they’re two DIFFERENT insurance companies, and since afaik authorities haven’t caught the assassin yet, they likely have no idea what his motives were. Could’ve been a personal vendetta or something else entirely for all we know. Regardless, an assassination is unlikely to change any policy ever because that would set an extremely dangerous precedent for the people who work at these companies: that killing them will get the change that people want and need in healthcare. And anyways, fatal violence almost never gets people to be like: “hey, let’s be better people so that others won’t kill us!” That’s not how morality, corporations, nor human nature work. It’s STILL not smart nor productive, as well as not moral, to kill people. I can’t believe I have to say this.

Please stop sending me hate mail for saying vigilante justice/murder of/against Insurence ceos isn’t smart or productive or moral.

It’s really fucked up that I have to defend that position.