#; PRAESTANTIA

[ukdamo]

A poem about Miletus

It's lifted from Easy Latin Stories for Beginners, by Bennett

Quum enim Argivi Delphorum oraculum de suae urbis salute consuluissent, alia de Argivis, alia de Milesiis edidit Pythia. Quae vero ad Miletum attinebant, haecce erant:

Tunc quoque, commentrix operum Milete malorum, Permultis coena et praestantia munera fies, Crinitisque pedes tua pluribus abluet uxor; Templi aliis nostri in Didymis sua cura manebit.

Tunc igitur haec Milesiis acciderunt, quando virorum maior pars interfecta est a Persis longos capillos alentibus, et templum in Didymis igne concrematum est.

The translation offered:

Then also, O Miletus, inventor of bad deeds, You will become dinner and excellent gifts for very many people, [and] Your wife will wash the feet of many long-haired conquerors; To the others will remain their sorrow of our temple in Didyma.

In the first line, Pythia addresses Miletus and says that its inhabitants have done some bad things. According to the text below the poem, the long-haired Persians will kill most of Miletian men

[mercuriicultores]

Bonartusius de Monte Magno – De nobilitate

Ego vero non [in] aliena gloria aut in falsis fortunae bonis, sed in propria nostra animi virtute hominis nobilitatem esse existimo. Nihil enim aliud est nobilitas, nisi excellentia quaedam qua digniora indignioribus praestant.

Sicut igitur homo animi praestantia dignior est reliquis animantibus, ita quidem claritudine animi homo hominem antecellit. Nam cum in optimis artibus diu exercitatus animus, iustitia, pietate, constantia, magnanimitate, moderatione ac prudentia claruit; cum bene de diis immortalibus, de parentibus, de amicis, de cognatis ac de republica meruit, cum in sanctissimis litterarum studiis educatus fuerit; tum profecto praeter ceteros nobilis, pollens, illustris ac clarus habetur.

[HIS] Yo, por mi parte, considero que la nobleza del hombre reside, no en la gloria ajena ni en los falsos bienes de la fortuna, sino en la virtud de nuestro propio espíritu. Pues la nobleza no es otra cosa que una cierta excelencia mediante la cual los más dignos sobresalen sobre los menos dignos. Así como el hombre supera al resto de animales por la excelencia de su espíritu, de la misma manera el hombre sobresale sobre el hombre por la claridad de su espíritu. Cuando el alma, tras haberse ejercitado durante mucho tiempo en las mejores artes, brilla por la justicia, la piedad, la constancia, la magnanimidad, la moderación y la prudencia; cuando ha sido merecedora del favor de los dioses inmortales, de los padres, de los amigos, de los parientes y de la República; cuando ha sido educada en los estudios más sagrados de las letras; entonces, sin duda alguna, se considera noble, poderosa, ilustre y brillante por encima de las demás.

[turangalila]

Guillaume Dufay (c.1397-1474) Supremum est mortalibus bonum (1433) pro pace, pro duo magnis luminarii mundi. isorhythmic motet for 3 voices            

Supremum est mortalibus bonum / Pax, optimum summi Dei donum. / Pace vero legem praestantia / Viget atque recti constantia; / Pace dies solutus et laetus, / Nocte somnus trahitur quietus; / Pax docuit virginem ornare / Auro comam crinesque nodare; / Pace rivi psallentes et aves / Patent laeti collesque suaves / Pace dives pervadit viator, / Tutus arva incolit arator. //

O sancta pax, diu expectata, / Mortalibus tam dulcis, tam grata, / Sis aeterna, firma, sine fraude, / Fidem tecum semper esse gaude. / Et qui nobis, o pax, te dedere / Possideant regnum sine fine: / Sit noster hic pontifex aeternus / Eugenius et rex Sigismundus! // Amen

_ Guillaume Dufay - Supremum Est Mortalibus Bonum. Cantica Symphonia. (2008, Glossa – GCD P31904)

Supremum est mortalibus bonum, Motets by Guillaume Dufay (c.1397-1474) Cantica Symphonia dir. Giuseppe Maletto

[milky-mochi]

before you (2) | cyj

genre: nerd! yeonjun, nerd! reader, aged up! yeonjun, college! au, boyfriend! yeonjun

pairing: choi yeonjun x reader

summary: falling in love with choi yeonjun was like breezing through the chapters of a book, with highlights of him bookmarked in your head.

listen to: ���� me after you - paul kim 🎶

chapters: intro | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

the first time you realised you liked yeonjun, you couldn’t believe you had been blind to it for so long.

four months had passed since that first day of library club. since then, you and yeonjun formed a friendship you had come to depend on. it started out by sitting next to each other during lectures. then, it evolved into study calls, which turned into talking on the phone for hours. at the height of it all, your weekly study sessions.

thursdays were reserved for your time with yeonjun, when you both would sit at the cute little cafe across the road and pour over your books. misery felt a little less bad when done with another person.

initially, you were just there for the friendship. the study sessions became a source of comfort. the both of you were working hard to keep your reputation afloat, and yeonjun was the only one who understood your struggles. he felt your pain and your joy. there was sincere companionship in this boy that you had never found in anyone before.

eventually, these meetings meant more and more to you. they became the highlight of your day, before climbing its way into becoming the highlight of your week. before you knew it, you depended on it so much that just thinking about it brought you excitement.

but you didn’t even realise it then. you did, however, in one study session.

one thursday, your professor asked to see you after class. at first, you didn’t want to go for it. you were waiting anxiously to go see yeonjun instead. the temptation to give your professor an excuse and run off was overwhelming, but he did mention giving you some good news, and the overachiever in you had to give in.

picking up your phone, you speedily dialed yeonjun’s number. he picked up after only three rings of the dial tone, startling you. in the background, you heard the sound of cars driving by, indicating that yeonjun was already off campus.

“hey y/n! i’ll be there in a few, i’m walking over now!”

“hey yeonjun, i’m so sorry, i’m gonna be late. my professor has something to tell me so he asked me to meet him after class. i’ll probably be like, 15 minutes.”

you braced yourself for his reaction, expecting his voice to fall in disappointment or disapprovement and your heart to twist in pain. instead, his chirpy voice rang in your ears. “oh it’s okay don’t worry about it! i hope it’s good news?”

you sighed in relief, releasing a breath you didn’t even realise you were holding. “he slipped that it was regarding a new opportunity, so it should be good?”

“hell yeah! go get that thing! whatever it is! i’ll wait for you at the cafe, yeah?” yeonjun said.

you laughed before humming in agreement. seeing your professor bidding you to come over, you ended the call and made your way over to his desk.

“hi professor, you wanted to see me?”

“right, y/n,” your professor started, gathering a stack of papers, “you know about the praestantia award right?”

everyone knew what the praestantia award was. it was the most prestigious scholarship a person your age could get. the scholarship was a guaranteed ticket to all the embellishments on your portfolio. all the opportunities you were dying for would easily be within your reach.

“yes of course, sir.”

“well it’s nomination period, and the english faculty has decided to nominate you under the language category,” he said, handing you an envelope. “i’ve emailed you the portal for the application, and these are the resources you’ll need to complete your application. thank you for all your hard work, y/n.”

receiving the envelope with a nod, you smiled graciously at your professor. your heart was beating out of your body with excitement. all your hard work had finally paid off into something you could be proud of. as soon as you saw your professor leave, you scooped your bag out and dashed out of the lecture theatre, heading straight for the cafe.

after running at top speed, you reached the cafe. grabbing the handles of the glass front doors, you swung them open. inside, yeonjun sat comfortably, staring down at his books. a single earbud was in his ear as he picked his pen up to write something down. his coffee sat patiently beside his pencil case.

“hey yeonjun i’m so sorry i’m late,” you sighed, sliding into your seat. after placing your bag down, you took another look at the table. raising your eyebrows, you asked, “what’s all this?”

yeonjun flashed you a sheepish smile. “well, you said you were gonna get good news, so i wanted your coffee to be here by the time you were. i got you a cake too!” he said, gesturing to the second drink and plate in front of him. “i got your favourite, hot white chocolate mocha, and the red velvet cake. i even got them to add marshmallows into the coffee, since we come here so often.”

you felt like melting, like said marshmallows were melting into your mocha.

he remembered your order. not only did he remember it perfectly, he remembered the coffee you drank for celebration, which was different from the coffee you drank when you were sad (a cold brew with coconut milk and extra sugar, yeonjun remembered that too).

“yeonjun, oh my goodness, thank you so much,” you gushed, “how much was the coffee and the cake? i’ll pay you back-”

“don’t worry about it,” yeonjun waved, melting you with yet another smile, “my treat. you deserve this, y/n.”

shit.

it was at that moment awareness knocked on the door of your mind. everything fell in place: all the stolen glances, all your smiles at the thought of him. this was the moment you realised your oblivion melted away to reveal what you had been blind to: you liked choi yeonjun.

it was, however, a very weird moment for you to realise. it was nothing like all the love scenes you had read in your books. usually the female lead came to this epiphany when the male lead hugged her in the spur of the moment, or when she got jealous of another girl, or even when he brushed his hand against hers to reach for something.

but no. you realised you liked yeonjun because he bought you coffee and a cake.

but it really did mean a lot to you. it meant so much that yeonjun cared for you enough to want to celebrate your good news, without even knowing what it was for. he made you feel seen. so, maybe, it wasn’t that weird at all.

“thank you, yeonjun,” you thanked him once again.

he smiled and told you to try the cake. you complied, picking up the fork and scraping a piece off its side. when you tasted it, your face lit up. yeonjun laughed at your smile and offered you a napkin to wipe the cream cheese frosting from the corner of your mouth.

over cake and coffee, you talked instead of studying, for the first time this semester. usually, your conversations would unfold on the way to the bus stop afterwards, and on the bus home. but that day was not a usual day, given the two new pieces of information that had shaken your world. that day, the both of you had synced mentally, subconsciously aware of the fact that both of you wanted companionship, and not to study.

you talked for a long time, about anything and everything. about all the weird times you’d experienced together: the time you caught two people making out during library club, the time your professor brought his dog to class, the time an old lady asked you guys for a recommendation on the cakes and then bought you said cake. you talked until every drop of coffee had been sipped and the white plate by your side held nothing but maroon crumbs.

once yeonjun realised that you were both finished, he asked, “by the way, what did your professor want to tell you just now?”

“oh,” you said, mouth full of your last bite of cake. you swallowed it before continuing with a proud smile staining your face. “he told me the english faculty is nominating me for the praestantia award. under the language category!”

yeonjun let out a laugh, a mixture of surprise, happiness and pride. he put his hand up, offering you a high five. “y/n that’s incredible! you deserve it so much!”

smiling brightly, you high fived yeonjun. in his excitement, yeonjun held your hand and shook it as he commended you on your achievement. he gushed about all the opportunities it would bring you, about how high you could fly with that award. he didn’t even realise your hand in his.

a blush crept up on your cheeks as you felt yeonjun’s fingers on your. how else could you respond when the guy you liked held your hand, and didn’t even realise it?

it took yeonjun a while, but when he did realise, he pulled his hand away, the same way you did the first time you placed your hand on his shoulder during library club. under his breath, he muttered a sorry as he darted his gaze away from you. you swore you could have seen a light pink dust his cheeks too.

yeonjun cleared his throat to try clearing the awkwardness lingering in the air. “well you did amazing y/n. i’m so proud of you! we should go celebrate.”

your ears perked up at his words. he wanted to celebrate your achievement? with just the two of you? your heart picked up speed as you nodded meekly, unwilling to reveal what you were actually thinking.

“where do you wanna go?” yeonjun asked, almost nervously, as he placed his hands on the table.

“the new bookshop across town,” you answered, almost too quickly. “i heard they have cats in it, and they publish their own poetry. they publish their books with the binding i like.”

“the ones with a wide margin before the text starts?” yeonjun asked. he didn’t know why he did, if he was being honest. of course he remembered your favourite type of book binding. you liked it that way because then you could read without creasing the spine of the book.

delighted that yeonjun remembered such a little thing, you nodded with spritely energy. “and they use e.b. garamond!”

looking at you geeking over the books, yeonjun laughed and promised to bring you there over the weekend. it excited you to no end. but you had to chastise yourself for being unabashedly thrilled to go to the bookstore with him. your heart swelled with unknown and unfamiliar feelings, categorizable only by whatever you had read in books. and yet, you told yourself that your life wasn’t a romance novel. this crush would go like all the ones you had before. it would result in a one-sided pining for someone who would never like you back. you told yourself not to get too ahead of yourself and to cut all this crush stuff out. yeonjun could never like you back.

but little did you know, yeonjun’s heart resounded with the same feelings for you.

---

next chapter

[vintagekrissword]

Rare Pamor Hamon Keris Pancuran Mas Golden Pluviae Antiquae Keris From Tuban Era Very Special https://www.etsy.com/listing/1063913492/rare-pamor-hamon-keris-pancuran-mas Dhapur Keris (genus figurae kris): Brojol Pamor (forma plicarum ferrearum): Pancuran Mas / Pluvia aurea Tangguh (aestimari tempus fabricandi): Tuban Lamina Longitudo: 35.5cm Warangka : Gayaman Surakarta Antiqua Trembalo Wood Palpate / manubrium: Vetus CREPITUS lignum flavo Pendok : Blewah Surakarta Mamas antiquus Mendak : Ancient Silver Proprietas huius keris $ Rara dignitas (forma plica ferrea) $ Ferrum in optima conditione Pamor $ non fractus et integer Item est prorsus eadem cum photo. C% verum prisce fideiussor Pancuran Mas' praestantia philosophiae: "Pancuran" est fons aquae quae manat, dum "mas" significat Aurum quod est metallum pretiosum magni pretii. Sic "Mas Pancuran" interpretari potest "Source". Aurum" pergit fluere. Si imber in communi aqua est, tunc imber aureus significat imbrem qui aurum servat (fons auri). Itaque auctoritas Mas Pancuran symbolum est spei et precationis pro Keris dominis vitam prosperam habere possunt, divitiis volutari est sicut fons perennis auri fluens habens. Mas Pancuran etiam aliam significationem habet quae nuntius est ut dominus Keris semper agere possit sicut imber/aquarum fons qui ambitus ambitus adiuvat. Humani sensus et curas sociales habere debent et aliis utiles esse debent ut in eius vita gloriari possint. Pamor Pancuran Mas doctrinas continet semper caritatem adiuvare ad alios adiuvandos quia eleemosynae sunt sicut fons aquae, nquantumcumque expendas numquam excurrere. Aqua est fons vitae omnium viventium in mundo, cum aquae praesentia tunc omnes vivere, crescere, crescere et fructum ferre possunt. Aqua etiam habet proprietates refrigerationis. Item eleemosyna, quia eleemosyna refrigerare et mollire corda hominum potest eleemosynas dantium et eleemosynas. Recipiens enim eleemosynam acceptam sentietur sicut res pretiosa et utilissima ad vitam suam, et pro eleemosyna dando eleemosynam dabit ei benedictio, et multoties ad ipsum redibit. Per eleemosynam, necessitudo socialis inter eleemosynas datores et recipientes eleemosynas lenior et concordior erit.

[disordersofresonanceandairflow]

it’s this thank you valiant @praestantia

[christophe76460]

Les réformés se sont souvent appuyés sur la patristique pour leur théologie, puis aussi sur les théologiens scolastiques médiévaux. Or, dans de récentes lectures, j’ai découvert qu’on puisait également dans des écrits du Haut Moyen Âge (c.500 – c.1000). Pierre Viret est connu pour ses efforts de vulgarisations et a écrit majoritairement en français afin de toucher le lectorat francophone au-delà de l’académie. Or, pour que certaines de ses positions soient lues par la Sorbonne et par Rome, il s’est contraint à quelques rares reprises d’écrire en latin. C’est dans son De origine continuatione, usu, autoritate, atque praestantia Ministerii verbi Dei, et Sacramentorum, imprimé à Genève en 1554, que l’on peut trouver une utilisation des théologiens de l’époque carolingienne pour renforcer la position réformée face à celle de Rome.

Dans le livre X, au folio 109r-v, Viret propose des appuis patristiques, puis indique que – concernant le sacrement de la Cène – Bède le Vénérable (672-735), Raban Maur (780-856) et Ratramne de Corbie (800-868) tendent plutôt vers la position réformée que celle de la transsubstantiation.

Raban Maur écrit dans le De institutione clericorum (L’Institution des clercs) au 31e chapitre – qui traite du sacrement en question – qu’ainsi que la matière du pain et du vin est consommée par le corps, de façon parallèle est consommée la vertu (virtute) du sacrement par l’homme intérieur (interior homo)1.

Ratramne de Corbie écrit le De corpore et sanguine Domini (Du corps et du sang du Seigneur) en réponse au De corpore et sanguine Christi (Du corps et du sang du Christ) de Paschase Radbert de Corbie (785-865). Ce dernier propose – inspiré par Ambroise – une exégèse ‘réaliste’ de l’institution du sacrement de la Cène, laquelle l’Église romaine médiévale suit de près avec la doctrine de la transsubstantiation. Ratramne, quant à lui, propose une interprétation ‘spiritualisante’ et commémorative, s’appuyant plutôt sur Augustin : le pain et le vin de l’eucharistie sont appelés corps et sang du Christ de la même manière que la célébration annuelle de la Pâque est appelée le jour de la résurrection (bien qu’il n’y eût historiquement qu’un seul jour de la résurrection)2. Autre part dans le traité, Ratramne propose le parallèle entre la Manne et la Cène :

… Jésus Christ n’avait pas encore pris chair humaine, il n’était pas encore mort pour le salut du monde, il ne nous avait pas encore racheté par son Sang, cependant nos Pères dans le désert prenant cette viande spirituelle et ce breuvage invisible, mangeaient dès lors sa Chair et buvaient son Sang, suivant les paroles de l’Apôtre [Paul] « Nos Pères ont mangé la même viande spirituelle, et bu le même breuvage spirituel » [1 Co 10:3-4]3. C’est qu’ici il ne faut pas vouloir pénétrer comment cela s’est pu faire, mais croire seulement que cela s’est fait.

[…]

C’est à cela que garde David, quand il dit, inspiré par le Saint Esprit : « L’homme a mangé le Pain des Anges » [Ps 78:25]. Car il y aurait de l’absurdité à s’imaginer que la Manne matérielle donnée à nos Pères, fut donnée aussi pour nourriture à l’Armée céleste des Anges, et qu’un tel manger fut propre à ceux qui sont pleinement rassasiés à la table du Verbe divin. Mais c’est que le Psalmiste, ou plutôt le Saint Esprit par la bouche du Psalmiste, montre en cet endroit, et ce que nos Pères ont pris en mangeant de cette Manne céleste, et ce que les fidèles doivent croire encore aujourd’hui dans le Mystère du Corps et du Sang du Seigneur : C’est Jésus Christ qui est désigné en l’un et en l’autre, c’est-à-dire, en la Manne et dans l’Eucharistie, et c’est lui qui nourrit les âmes de ceux qui croient en lui, et qui est aussi la nourriture des Anges. Et cela non par la manducation de la bouche, comme pour engraisser les corps, mais par une manducation spirituelle et par la vertu du Verbe divin4.

Les réformés s’alignent alors du côté de Ratramne et font revivre au 16e siècle ce débat de l’époque carolingienne5.

PS : les textes de Raban Maur et de Ratramne de Corbie mériteraient une édition et une traduction modernes !

[tradcathsermons]

Tweeted

All Catholics are bound under pain of grave sin to accept that Eve was historically & literally created from Adam's rib. (Pont. Biblical Comm. 1909 Q. 3 + Praestantia Scripturae On the Bible Against the Modernists Pope Pius X - 1907) #noevolution

— John Farrell (@AnnulmentProof) December 17, 2019

[melshing]

Well, at least one good thing happened today -- H's school fixed his Praestantia photo... Now we are TOTALLY DONE with that place! http://bit.ly/2sCdSG1

[nerdyphantomsandwich-blog]

Post 5

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla profecto est, quin suam vim retineat a primo ad extremum. Qui-vere falsone, quaerere mittimus-dicitur oculis se privasse; At certe gravius. Est enim effectrix multarum et magnarum voluptatum. Graccho, eius fere, aequalí? Nunc agendum est subtilius. An vero displicuit ea, quae tributa est animi virtutibus tanta praestantia? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Itaque nostrum est-quod nostrum dico, artis est-ad ea principia, quae accepimus. At quicum ioca seria, ut dicitur, quicum arcana, quicum occulta omnia?

[hailengineering]

shine whiles

by Artisan

this is the caption — by unsplash.it

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed haec omittamus; Deprehensus omnem poenam contemnet.

View on Hail

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quam nemo umquam voluptatem appellavit, appellat; Non enim solum Torquatus dixit quid sentiret, sed etiam cur. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Nec lapathi suavitatem acupenseri Galloni Laelius anteponebat, sed suavitatem ipsam neglegebat; Multoque hoc melius nos veriusque quam Stoici. Quis non odit sordidos, vanos, leves, futtiles? Ut alios omittam, hunc appello, quem ille unum secutus est. Scientiam pollicentur, quam non erat mirum sapientiae cupido patria esse cariorem.

Quam nemo umquam voluptatem appellavit, appellat; At enim sequor utilitatem.

Indicant pueri, in quibus ut in speculis natura cernitur. Quamquam non negatis nos intellegere quid sit voluptas, sed quid ille dicat. Sed quanta sit alias, nunc tantum possitne esse tanta. Quae qui non vident, nihil umquam magnum ac cognitione dignum amaverunt. Ergo opifex plus sibi proponet ad formarum quam civis excellens ad factorum pulchritudinem? Quaesita enim virtus est, non quae relinqueret naturam, sed quae tueretur. Cuius quidem, quoniam Stoicus fuit, sententia condemnata mihi videtur esse inanitas ista verborum.

Collige omnia, quae soletis: Praesidium amicorum. Hic ambiguo ludimur.

Cum ageremus, inquit, vitae beatum et eundem supremum diem, scribebamus haec. Quid de Platone aut de Democrito loquar? Et certamen honestum et disputatio splendida! omnis est enim de virtutis dignitate contentio. Satis est ad hoc responsum. Hos contra singulos dici est melius. Illis videtur, qui illud non dubitant bonum dicere -; Quippe: habes enim a rhetoribus;

An vero displicuit ea, quae tributa est animi virtutibus tanta praestantia? In eo enim positum est id, quod dicimus esse expetendum. Nunc omni virtuti vitium contrario nomine opponitur. Itaque mihi non satis videmini considerare quod iter sit naturae quaeque progressio. Quo modo autem philosophus loquitur? Quis istud possit, inquit, negare? Mihi, inquam, qui te id ipsum rogavi? Quis non odit sordidos, vanos, leves, futtiles?

Sed tamen intellego quid velit. Sed quanta sit alias, nunc tantum possitne esse tanta. Qua igitur re ab deo vincitur, si aeternitate non vincitur? Inde sermone vario sex illa a Dipylo stadia confecimus. Color egregius, integra valitudo, summa gratia, vita denique conferta voluptatum omnium varietate. In his igitur partibus duabus nihil erat, quod Zeno commutare gestiret. At hoc in eo M. Nulla erit controversia. At Zeno eum non beatum modo, sed etiam divitem dicere ausus est. Nam ista vestra: Si gravis, brevis; At hoc in eo M. Que Manilium, ab iisque M.

Moriatur, inquit. Recte, inquit, intellegis. Ne discipulum abducam, times. Id enim volumus, id contendimus, ut officii fructus sit ipsum officium. Diodorus, eius auditor, adiungit ad honestatem vacuitatem doloris.

Quae enim adhuc protulisti, popularia sunt, ego autem a te elegantiora desidero. De illis, cum volemus. Quid autem habent admirationis, cum prope accesseris? Non dolere, inquam, istud quam vim habeat postea videro; Animum autem reliquis rebus ita perfecit, ut corpus; Ego vero volo in virtute vim esse quam maximam;

Etiam beatissimum? Haec para/doca illi, nos admirabilia dicamus. Nemo nostrum istius generis asotos iucunde putat vivere. Ut proverbia non nulla veriora sint quam vestra dogmata. Bonum incolumis acies: misera caecitas. Eiuro, inquit adridens, iniquum, hac quidem de re;

Attachments

440Hz-5sec   MP3, 29.7 KB

Hoteles_cerca2   PDF, 3.1 KB

Photo Gallery

View the full article

[cannabuzzhub]

More than 100 Google fonts

More than 100 Google fonts

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Illi enim inter se dissentiunt. Sed nunc, quod agimus; Quorum altera prosunt, nocent altera. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Hoc loco tenere se Triarius non potuit. An vero displicuit ea, quae tributa est animi virtutibus tanta praestantia? Hoc dictum in una re latissime patet, ut in omnibus factis re, non teste moveamur. Omnia peccata…

[thestrippingnetwork-blog]

More than 100 Google fonts

More than 100 Google fonts

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Illi enim inter se dissentiunt. Sed nunc, quod agimus; Quorum altera prosunt, nocent altera. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Hoc loco tenere se Triarius non potuit. An vero displicuit ea, quae tributa est animi virtutibus tanta praestantia? Hoc dictum in una re latissime patet, ut in omnibus factis re, non teste moveamur. Omnia peccata…

[vintagekrissword]

Authentic Heredes A 14th Century Javanese Keris Tilam Upih Pamor Walang Sinuduk Vetus Antiqua

https://www.etsy.com/listing/1077946547/authentic-heirloom-from-14th-century

Dhapur Keris (genus figurae kris): Tilam Upih Auctoritas (argumentum ferreum): Walang Sinuduk (Rare auctoritas) Tangguh (tempus fabricarum aestimatur): Mataram (saeculi XIV) Ferrum Longitudo: 36cm Warangka : Gayaman Surakarta, Antiqua Timoho Wood Palpate / palpate : Vetus Kemuning Lignum Surakarta Model Pendok: Cantaloupe Surakarta Minister: Argentum

PHILOSOPHIA

Tilam Upih, proprie tilam mattam significat, et upih est nux areca, quae mat ex areca nuce significat. Hoc Dhapur significationem vitae simplicitatis importat. Quantum ad dignitatem, est auctoritas Mas Udan, id est pluviam auream. Uterque perquam mirum. Tilam Upih plus est de simplicitate vitae, dum Udan Mas plus est de significatione divitiarum et vitae pretii.

Divitiae est excessus omnium consecutus, paupertas vero defectus omnium quae adepti sunt. Hoc keris alte significatum est quod simplicitas veras opes evadit. Simplicitas synonyma est cum gratia et continentia. Verae autem divitiae plenitudo est gratitudinis et continentiae, ut quisquis in simplicitate vivit sit dives, qui actu dives est. et quod allicit homines in simplicitate viventes, hoc est quod vita eorum procul ab anxietate sit, et etiam benedictionibus inaestimabili impleatur.

Simplicitas nec minus nec plus est. Simplex satis est. Homines qui in simplicitate vivere possunt, eminentiam gloriam habent. Qui in fine neque pauper est neque dives, sed modestus.

Ut in aspectu huius kris, dhapur cum timoho stilo solo warangka simpliciter simplex est ut eius apparentiae simplicitas. Praestantia mas udan, quae ad gonjo penetrat, suum valorem efficit qui omnia vitia tegit. Ita quod hoc keris vanum facit, sed magni pretii locum habet.

https://www.etsy.com/listing/1077946547/authentic-heirloom-from-14th-century

[vintagekrissword]

Antiqua Javanese Recta Keris Tumenggung cum Serena Pamor Setro Banyu Mili de Tuban Era https://www.etsy.com/listing/1105841923/an-ancient-javanese-straight-keris Dhapur Keris (genus figurae keris): Tumenggung Pamor (argumentum ferreum): Setro Banyu / Banyu Mili / Singkir Tangguh (aestimari tempus fabricandi): Tuban AD 17th century Ferrum Longitudo: 35cm Warangka : Gayaman Surakarta Antiqua silva Mango Wood Palpate / palpate : Antiquae Bang Kemuning Wood Pendok : Bunton Surakarta Kuningan Mendak : Copper Ornamental Gems Antiqua kris clara dignitate, firma et indole. Auctoritas Setro Banyu Pamor Setro Banyu seu Pamor Ilining Warih (banyu mili), unus e marchionis motifs est, cuius figura lineas a basi laminae usque ad apicem protensas imitatur. Sunt lineae praestantiae integrae, aliae fractae, multae ramosae. Lineae flexae impressionem aquarum fluentium dare videntur. Symbolum felicitatis et prosperitatis in possessorem suum, novas condiciones afferens et ex difficilibus vitae suae temporibus questus. Sicut aqua philosophiae semper fluit, quaerunt viam suam a monte ad Oceanum. Non mirum quod multi amantes keris amant