sylseal
sylseal
I'm Styll Here
2K posts
Hello hello! My name is Syl, I'm a dork who enjoys a lot of different things. I have an AO3 now! My name on there is theSylseal. Check it out if you get a second! RP BLOG IS: @puelluna
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
sylseal · 4 hours ago
Photo
Tumblr media
a revealing interview
124K notes · View notes
sylseal · 4 hours ago
Text
"oh homeless people are just gonna use your money to buy drugs" and? and?? the government uses my tax money to buy bombs and cops, you think I care if someone in a shitty situation uses money I gave them to feel marginally less shitty? fuck off!
171K notes · View notes
sylseal · 13 days ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Rainy day in Kyoto
80K notes · View notes
sylseal · 25 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
GETTING YOU MOTHERFUCKER
36K notes · View notes
sylseal · 2 months ago
Text
cr 大同云冈蛋雕-凯哥
14K notes · View notes
sylseal · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
From a state hearing in Texas
59K notes · View notes
sylseal · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Always a good time to burn down yet another village!
Patreon
62K notes · View notes
sylseal · 2 months ago
Text
Please forgive me for ranting, but...I am so tired of AI. Just so tired. I don't want Microsoft Copilot, or Google Gemini, or Meta AI, or whatever other energy-sucking, water-wasting, mediocrity-spewing LLM is currently being thrust upon me. I just want to be left alone to create in peace.
28K notes · View notes
sylseal · 2 months ago
Text
"AI Engorgement" refers to the phenomenon where an AI model absorbs too much misinformation in its training data. This corrupts the model's base truth, leading to strange glitches. An engorged image model, when prompted to create images for "cat" and "historical", generated the following:
Tumblr media Tumblr media
AI Engorgement may trigger a complete dissolution of truth within a model, leading it to back conspiracy theories, clearly debunked facts, and mistake fiction for reality. It is believed that the systematic siphoning of unreality by AI datasets is already revealing signs of engorgement in every major model.
32K notes · View notes
sylseal · 2 months ago
Text
Today's Seal Is: Some Kind Of Wuppy
22K notes · View notes
sylseal · 2 months ago
Text
No you guys you have to read to the part where they reveal one of the most common reasons the companies are bringing them back:
Toothacre also notes some irony in one of the common reasons companies are bringing back DEI policies. “Thirty-three percent said it was harder to hire diverse talent. What did they think was going to happen when they eliminated all of their DEI initiatives? And so they inadvertently created an environment that said, ‘Hey, we don’t care if you are comfortable here or not,’” she said.
Note that about 75% of all the responding companies say that their policy on DEI initiatives is ultimately driven by the bottom line. Do not ever expect a company to behave like a human person; at their cores, corporations are creatures of pure profit. Exceptions to the norm are typically privately owned rather than publicly traded and even then you're basically at the mercy of the collective judgment of a super rich guy or, worse, family with varying levels of generational insulation from any perspective held by someone who has to work for a living.
Anyway. Back to the article. A solid third of companies that rolled back their DEI initiatives are already bringing them back (33%). 21% of that total are doing it "quietly" by sneaking back the submission forms, changing the language, and hoping no one notices they caved, and 12% are openly admitting they made a mistake (like companies normally do when they alter policy). Of the rest? Only 40% of all companies that destroyed DEI initiatives aren't currently discussing or considering any new DEI investment. The remaining 27% of companies that cut back DEI are in various stages of internal discussion about restoring DEI initiatives.
Y'all, people are pushing back. One third of these DEI coward companies reported collective pushback from employees strong enough that they had to take notice. Two thirds of the total companies experienced noticeable consequences of rolling back DEI investment—and for the most part, these consequences weren't coming from boycotts. (These were least likely to be cited as consequences at 9% of companies reporting, but certainly capable of nailing a company in the profits — ask Target.) but from people doing the hard, uncomfortable, risky feeling work of speaking up at their workplaces, turning down job offers or quitting and saying why, changing jobs or organizing unions or agitating for these roles to come back. Workers, who collectively have much more power within a company than customers, are leading the charge here. Thank you, worker-organizers!
10K notes · View notes
sylseal · 2 months ago
Text
🚨Wet Beast Alert🚨
Tumblr media Tumblr media
running ermine photos by Jacob Buck
5K notes · View notes
sylseal · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
81K notes · View notes
sylseal · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
unrestrained summer fun
243K notes · View notes
sylseal · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
look at my head boy
79K notes · View notes
sylseal · 2 months ago
Text
12K notes · View notes
sylseal · 2 months ago
Text
there is forreal avian warfare happening outside my workplace im so invested
1K notes · View notes